Issue with Vendor Payment Terms

Hi Gurus,
We're facing an issue with the Payment Terms of a Vendor in our SRM system.
In R/3 the Vendor has Payment Term 'A' but when we create a PO for this vendor it appears with Payment Term 'B' (PT from SRM I think)
The correct PT is 'A' (the one from R/3).
Does anyone know if the PT are saved in SRM side also and where to check this information??
I can check in R/3 with code XK03 but from SRM side -in code BP- I can't find PT data for this vendor.
Regardss.

Hi,
Payment term is different in PO when compared to ECC, the following could be anyone of the reasons :
01. PLease check the payment term value in CONTRACT; if you assigned contract as SOS in PO for ECS
02. Please check he tpayment term value in BBPMAININT where you can maintain different payment terms manually.
I hope the above information is very helpful to you.
Thanks
Rajesh K

Similar Messages

Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

HI,
I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
Thanking you.

Dear
Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice. Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions.
Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right. Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
Regards

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

How to get PO and vendor payment term number of days??

Hi Experts,
I want to have a) Purchase order payment term number of days as well as
b) vendor Payment term number of days.
For a) For Purchase order payment term number of days I am using table EKKO and taking ZBD1T field which is giving payment
           term number of days.
          Is it correct??
      b) vendor Payment term number of days I am using table LFB1 field Zterm to take payment term key not number of days.
           Based on this key i will go to table T052 and find corresponding number of days as told MM consultants .
           But this is not BW work. We need one single table from which we can take the field or enhance the current extractor
          with that field.
So is there any other option for (b)
and Whether steps for (a) is correct???
Please confirm this.
Thanks in Advance,
Uday Shankar.

For a) For Purchase order payment term number of days I am using table EKKO and taking ZBD1T field which is giving payment
term number of days.
Is it correct??
Payment terms for purchasing doesn't come delivered as part of the R3/ECC tables and is usually is added as a custom field to EKKO and populated via a User Exit. That looks to be the instance in your case because the field that you show as being the payment terms begins with a Z (custom fields begin with Y or Z). That appears, without being able to actually validate in your R3/ECC environment, to be the correct field to use. You would have to validate, however, with the end customer or your MM function consultant to be 100% certain. If this is the correct one to use, you're going to have to enhance the 2LIS_02_HDR extractor by enhancing the extraction structure and creating the User Exit to read it from EKKO and populate into the DataSource.
b) vendor Payment term number of days I am using table LFB1 field Zterm to take payment term key not number of days.
Based on this key i will go to table T052 and find corresponding number of days as told MM consultants .
But this is not BW work. We need one single table from which we can take the field or enhance the current extractor
with that field.
You can enhance the 2LIS_02_HDR extractor with the Vendor Payment Terms by joining the following in your User Exit:
EKKO-LIFNR = LFB1-LIFNR
EKKO-BUKRS = LFB1-BUKRS
LFB1-ZTERM = T052-ZTERM
This could either be done in a SELECT statement in the User Exit to do this equi join, or you could create a view on your R3/ECC environment and SELECT from that view.

Vendor Payment term Datasource

Hi
I have requirement to extract SAP vendor payment terms master data to BW. can you pls help me with right datasource for this.
Which datasouce needs to used to extract vendor payment term.
In SAP, we can use via SAP is FK03 transaction.
Regards,
Anbu

Hello Anbu
Data flow is like this
0FI_AP_4 ( DataSource) -
>0FI_AP_O03 ( DSO) -
>0FIAP_C03 ( Cube).
If you install the standard cube in BW system with Data Flow before option , it will install the complete flow.
Regards
Anindya

Vendor Payment Term

Hi All,
How to configure the following Vendor Payment term?
Business requirement:
We require vendor payment term with multiple cash discount days option. Standard SAP provides 2 discount days option, but we require more than 20 discount options within one payment term.
Following is the example of a payment term, which requires multiple discount options as shown.
Payment Date Baseline = Vendor Invoice Date
1% 10 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.95% 11 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.90% 12 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.85% 13 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.80% 14 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.75% 15 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.70% 16 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.65% 17 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.60% 18 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.55% 19 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.50% 20 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.45% 21 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.40% 22 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.35% 23 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.30% 24 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.25% 25 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.20% 26 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.15% 27 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.10% 28 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
0.05% 29 days Net 30 days from date of invoice
Net 30 days from date of invoice
Best Regards,
Siva

Hi,
This is one single payment term.
Example: Material "ABCD" - Qty 1 EA @ USD100 is ordered and received from vendor. In the PO, this payment term is mentioned. Hence the discount offered by the vendor is based on when the payment is made.
If payment is made on the 30th day from the date of invoice, it is due net. For each day prior to 30, the discount increases. Hence the earlier the payment is made the higher the discount.
If the invoice date is 01-Sep-07, the following table shows the discount based on payment date:
Discount %          Payment Date               Discount Amount
1.00       %      10     Days from Invoice date     10-Sep-07      1.00
0.95       %      11     Days from Invoice date     11-Sep-07      0.95
0.90       %      12     Days from Invoice date     12-Sep-07      0.90
0.85       %      13     Days from Invoice date     13-Sep-07      0.85
0.80       %      14     Days from Invoice date     14-Sep-07      0.80
0.75       %      15     Days from Invoice date     15-Sep-07      0.75
0.70       %      16     Days from Invoice date     16-Sep-07      0.70
0.65       %      17     Days from Invoice date     17-Sep-07      0.65
0.60       %      18     Days from Invoice date     18-Sep-07      0.60
0.55       %      19     Days from Invoice date     19-Sep-07      0.55
0.50       %      20     Days from Invoice date     20-Sep-07      0.50
0.45       %      21     Days from Invoice date     21-Sep-07      0.45
0.40       %      22     Days from Invoice date     22-Sep-07      0.40
0.35       %      23     Days from Invoice date     23-Sep-07      0.35
0.30       %      24     Days from Invoice date     24-Sep-07      0.30
0.25       %      25     Days from Invoice date     25-Sep-07      0.25
0.20       %      26     Days from Invoice date     26-Sep-07      0.20
0.15       %      27     Days from Invoice date     27-Sep-07      0.15
0.10       %      28     Days from Invoice date     28-Sep-07      0.10
0.05       %      29     Days from Invoice date     29-Sep-07      0.05
(0.00)      %      30     Days from Invoice date     30-Sep-07      (0.00)
Best Regards,
Siva

Vendor payment terms replication

Hi,
Vendor payment terms are not getting replicated to SRM 4.0 from ECC 5.0.We have batch jobs running for vendor replication ( new and update).When i change the payment terms in ECC , it is not coming to SRM.I checked in Manage BPs.
Thanks for suggesting any report / tables where i can find number of vendors that are different in both the systems and replication process. ( As i am unable to use the t code BBPGETVD, BBPUPDVD in easyaccess)
Thanks a lot.

Hi pramod,
OK. I got it.
SAP Note 1104581 -No logical system in customizing view
BBPV_PTERM_LOCAL
Symptom
You have transported local payment term Customizing (view BBPV_PTERM_LOCAL)
from your SRM development system to a productive system.
The transported payment terms cannot be selected for local purchase orders
and are not visible in Customizing step "Supplier Relationship Management >
SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Create Payment Conditions".
More TermsZTERM, pay, BBP_POC, payment tab, terms of payment
Cause and Prerequisites
Local payment terms must have the local logical system ID in the
corresponding fields of tables BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT.
Solution
Please implement this note or the relevant Support Package.
You can then use report BBPCU_PAYTERM_CONV to change the logical system of
the transported entries to the local SRM logical system.
In the single selection parameter, enter the logical system of the
transported entries.
An error will be generated if the entered logical system exists in table
BBP_BACKEND_DEST.
If an entry already exists with the same key (apart from logical system
name) as the tranported entry, no conversion will take place.
The keys of the converted payment terms and their texts will be listed
after executing the program.
The keys of the payment terms that cannot be converted will also be lsited.
table BBP_PAYTERM or BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT.
BBPM_BUT_FRG0061
Payment conditions
i will also check and come back to you.
regards
muthu

Are Vendor Payment Terms on RFx Object in Sourcing?

Hi There,
We uncovered this document via a Google search:
http://help.sap.com/scenarios_bus2008/helpdata/en/6d/4c0a50eab44534bef84c9b7bcec94a/content.htm
The document implies that the vendor payment terms are on the RFx object but I cannot confirm that the field exists on this object in Sourcing 7. Does anybody know what version of Sourcing supports this mapping? I haven't been able to find the document that this link belongs to, so it's possible that it's an orphaned page from some old documentation, but I'd appreciate confirmation from one of the experts on this forum.
Thanks!
Shanker

i can confirm that the mapping is available in the standard mapping for Release 7.0. (MM_Award_To_Purchase_Order)
also, there are many other fields available not included in the mapping guide, but also readily available for use, with some amendments to the Data Types in SAP PI.
see link for integration guide (including the table you linked)
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000091446&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700000161702011E

Update vendor payment terms

Hello
I have a requirement to have the same values for vendor payment terms in purchasing view and accounting view.
I found this topic which works only with transaction XK01 & XK02
Wich user-exit for Creating Vendor I must use?
How make it work with MK01 / MK02 ?
Thanks

Check badi VENDOR_ADD_DATA & method PRESET_VALUES_CCODE.
Try to update the required field for LFB1 in that method.

How can we have cash discount as well as vendor payment terms

We have vendor payment term of 2% 10 days, net 30. On top of it the vendor gives us 4% discount on certain POs where the total PO amount exceeds 20K. We want to have the 4% discount on the individual line item at the time of the invoice posting and then additional 1% discount from the payment term. We donu2019t want the PO price to change due to the 4% discount.
In MIRO, it seems we can take either the cash discount (field WSKTO) or the discount from the payment term (field ZTERM). How can we take both the discounts?

1 - The 2% 10 days, net 30
           It can be calculated using the Vendor payrment terms.
2 - The 4% discount which has to be applied on certain POs where the total PO amount exceeds 20K and should not change the PO price.
           I - Create a condition type with the calculation type A - Percentage and select the option Accruals in Control data 2.
          II - In the Calculation schema,
                                     Calculate the 4% value from the total of the PO Price.
                                     Untick the manual.
                                     Mark the condition type as Statistics.
                                     Enter a Condition Formula Calculation Rule (Calculation Type) or Use the Requirement to activate if the
                                            value exceeds 20K.
                                     Enter the Accrual key like (FR1, FRE ...) and assign the GL account to that.
                     By Maintaining this way, you affect only the internal price and not the PO price.

How to get vendor payment terms

Hi all,
I am creating a report. I need to get vendor payment terms. There are invoices without PO, how can I retrieve the payment terms for those cases.
Thanks.

Hi nene
in case of invoice without PO, The payment term will be selected from the vendor master data (in View : payment terms transaction in XK03).
Check payment term in master data is exist or not.
the data is in the table LFB1 : Field ZTERM
Regards
Wiboon

Vendor Payment Terms

Hi All
Is there a report that can give me the Vendor Payment terms
Vishnu

Hi Vishnu,
go to SE16 , enter table name LFM1. in display parameters select ZTERM
Regards
Mangesh.

Sales order blocked for credit with status "Payment Terms"

Hi Experts,
Sales order is blocked for credit, as when i refer the t.code vkm3 or vkm1, the status of blocking showing as "Payment Term". Geenrally the status of credit block would be 'Old item', Dynamic check', value etc.
My question here is how the sales order is blocked with status "Payment Terms", and what is the role of payment terms in credit management.
regards
Vivek.

Hi Vivek,
The Standard Cr. management ( Automatic credit check) of SAP has Critical Fields Check - payment terms is one of them,
If it is being changed in sales order (other than maintained in Customer master) the sales order will go for credit block
Thanks
Dilip S

Vendor Payment Terms config for 30%advance 70% after GR

Hi Guys,
How to configure Vendor Payment Terms for " Vendor Payment Terms config for 30%advance 70% after GR "
Please suggest your expert comments.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jackie

sappassion2011 wrote:
Hi Guys,
>
> How to configure Vendor Payment Terms for " Vendor Payment Terms config for 30%advance 70% after GR "
>
> Please suggest your expert comments.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jackie
Hi Jackie,
Do them in trxn OME2
Regards
Shiva

Enhanced Vendor Payment Terms for multiple discounts days

Hi
There is requirement of multiple discount days in a single vendor payment term.
Standard SAP provides only 2 discounts for a payment term.
Now we need as many as 30 discounts per vendor payment term.
How do we achieve this?
We are using 4.6c SAP version....
Very urgent please help..
Regards,
Krishna prasad

Hi Krishna,
Did you find the answer?
I too have a similar problem; if you could find the answer yourself please help.
Regards,
KKG

Issue with Vendor Payment Terms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for