Issues With AET custom field generation,EHP1

Hi ,
There is a DB limit for creating a custom fields
error showing limit exceeds .
Here we can use reusable fields.
we are unable to delete the fields also...by clicking on delete icon and then save and generate.
can we control this?
and table view created throgh aet ,is called by bp_head .
now when i delete the component generated by aet ,getting an error ,as at run time its getting called by
GET_INTERFACE_VIEW_CONTR.
How should i reslove it.
Thanks,
Anitha.

Hi Anitha,
During the creation of AET fields, if you have chosen the options like BW/R3/Mobile then the problem comes when deeleting these fields. Please follow the instructions given in the note 1346128. There are some set of manual steps given to delete AET fields.
Hope it helps. satish

Similar Messages

MS Project 2013 - Issue with Resource Custom Fields

When I use “Resource Custom Fields”, (Number type) the formula do not work. Moreover the “Calculation for task and group summary rows” options do not work (be it sum, average or any other option). Any information regarding this will really be
helpful.

No, what I mean is that data you enter into the Number1 field added in a Resource view (Resource Sheet for example) will not show the same data as the Number1 field added in a task view. See FAQ51 at: http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm
If you are seeing the correct data in the Task view, you can try applying the built-in Resource Group - but the issue will be that you will not see the total per resource. For example - if Resource1 and Resource2 are assigned to one task and then Resource2
and Resource3 are assigned to another task, you won't see the individual details for Resource 2.

Issue with new Custom field value in Material UI (EHP5)

Hi
We added new Custom field (country) in material UI for Routing the WF based on country.
we added this new field in material general data, When user press the "check" button in the header the value disappeared in the UI.
This field value required only in MDG CR level, this field value will not be updated in ECC active area.
Request your inputs to solve this problem.

resolved myself:
PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
*                      Verarbeitung vor der Ausgabe
*MS17092009 Non eliminare modules standard.
MODULE set_propriety.
MODULE INIT_SUB.
MODULE GET_DATEN_SUB.
PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
*                      Verarbeitung nach der Eingabe
MODULE GET_DATEN_SUB.
CHAIN.
      FIELD MARA-ZBARCODE.
ENDCHAIN.
MODULE SET_DATEN_SUB.
FIELD MARA-ZBARCODE MODULE BARCODE_0001 ON INPUT.

Problem is with the custom field validate in the custome tab

Hello Experts,
We have created additional tab in cProject Project definition level
with some Custom fields.
1. These all custom field we have maintained search help with Check
table. But cProject screen these fields it is allowing other values
also aprt from check table values. It is not through any error while
entering wrong value apart from check table values. Properly maintained
the check tables in back end.
2. One custom fields my client need only to allow Numeric values only.
For this we change the data element as 'NUMC' in field. But it is
allowing entering the char value also.
Kindly suggest if anything is needed to be done in webdynpro component
level to maintain validations for custom fields.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Thanks & Regards,
Raj

Hello Raj
I am having the same issue. Have you been able to resolve yours, and how did you ressolve it?
Thanks
Chatsworth

Performance issue with a Custom view

Hi ,
I am pretty new to performance tuning and facing a performance issue with a custom view.
Execution time for view query is good but as soon as I append a where caluse to view query ,the execution time increases.
Below is the view query:
CREATE OR REPLACE XXX_INFO_VIEW AS
SELECT csb.system_id license_id,
cst.name license_number ,
csb.system_type_code license_type ,
csb.attribute3 lac , -- license authorization code
csb.attribute6 lat , -- license admin token
csb.attribute12 ols_reg, -- OLS Registration allowed flag
l.attribute4 license_biz_type ,
NVL (( SELECT 'Y' l_supp_flag
FROM csi_item_instances cii,
okc_k_lines_b a,
okc_k_items c
WHERE c.cle_id = a.id
AND a.lse_id = 9
AND c.jtot_object1_code = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND c.object1_id1 = cii.instance_id||''
AND cii.instance_status_id IN (3, 510)
AND cii.system_id = csb.system_id
AND a.sts_code IN ('SIGNED', 'ACTIVE')
AND NVL (a.date_terminated, a.end_date) > SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM < 2), 'N') active_supp_flag,
hp.party_name "Customer_Name" , -- Customer Name
hca.attribute12 FGE_FLAG,
(SELECT /*+INDEX (oklt OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1) */
nvl(max((decode(name, 'eSupport','2','Enterprise','1','Standard','1','TERM RTU','0','TERM RTS','0','Notfound'))),0) covName --TERM RTU and TERM RTS added as per Vijaya's suggestion APR302013
FROM OKC_K_LINES_B oklb1,
OKC_K_LINES_TL oklt,
OKC_K_LINES_B oklb2,
OKC_K_ITEMS oki,
CSI_item_instances cii
WHERE
OKI.JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND oklb1.id=oklt.id
AND OKI.OBJECT1_ID1 =cii.instance_id||''
AND Oklb1.lse_id=2
AND oklb1.dnz_chr_id=oklb2.dnz_chr_id
AND oklb2.lse_id=9
AND oki.CLE_ID=oklb2.id
AND cii.system_id=csb.system_id
AND oklt.LANGUAGE=USERENV ('LANG')) COVERAGE_TYPE
FROM csi_systems_b csb ,
csi_systems_tl cst ,
hz_cust_accounts hca,
hz_parties hp,
fnd_lookup_values l
WHERE csb.system_type_code = l.lookup_code (+)
AND csb.system_id = cst.system_id
AND hca.cust_account_id =csb.customer_id
AND hca.party_id= hp.party_id
AND cst.language = USERENV ('LANG')
AND l.lookup_type (+) = 'CSI_SYSTEM_TYPE'
AND l.language (+) = USERENV ('LANG')
AND NVL (csb.end_date_active, SYSDATE+1) > SYSDATE)
I have forced an index to avoid Full table scan on OKC_K_LINES_TL and suppressed an index on CSI_item_instances.instance id to make the view query fast.
So when i do select * from XXX_INFO_VIEWit executes in a decent time,But when I try to do
select * from XXX_INFO_VIEW where active_supp_flag='Y' and coverage_type='1'
it takes lot of time.
Execution plan is same for both queries in terms of cost but with WHERE clause Number of bytes increases.
Below are the execution plans:
View query:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
     10 COUNT STOPKEY
          9 NESTED LOOPS
               7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
                    5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
                         2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
                              1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                         4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                              3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                    6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
     12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
          11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
          27 NESTED LOOPS
               25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
                    23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
                         20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
                              17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
                                   14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
                                        13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                   16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                                        15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                              19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
                                   18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                         22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
                              21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
                    24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
     43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
          41 NESTED LOOPS
               39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
                    37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
                         32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
                              30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
                                   29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
                              31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
                         36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                              35 HASH JOIN
                                   33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                   34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                    38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
          42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918
Execution plan for view query with WHERE clause:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
     10 COUNT STOPKEY
          9 NESTED LOOPS
               7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
                    5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
                         2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
                              1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                         4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                              3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                    6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
     12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
          11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
          27 NESTED LOOPS
               25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
                    23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
                         20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
                              17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
                                   14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
                                        13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                   16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                                        15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                              19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
                                   18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                         22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
                              21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
                    24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
     44 VIEW VIEW APPS.WRS_LICENSE_INFO_V Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
          43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
               41 NESTED LOOPS
                    39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
                         37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
                              32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
                                   30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
                                        29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
                                   31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
                              36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                   35 HASH JOIN
                                        33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                        34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                         38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                    40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
               42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918

Hi,
You should always try using primary index fields, if not possible then secondary index fields.
Even if you cannot do anything from either of the two then try this,
Use Less distinct fields on the top.
In your case , you can use bukrs ,gjahr ,werks on the top in the where condition..then followed by less distinct values..
Even when you use secondary index if you have 4 fields in your sec index and you are using only two fields from the top then the index is useful only upto that two fields provided they are in sequence.

Enhancement of component ERP_H with a custom field in the Web UI

Hi,
I'm facing an error when enhancing the component ERP_H with a custom field in the web UI.
I've followed the steps mentioned in the pdf document called "Enhancement Options for the Lean Order Interface" (Note
1224179):
I´ve done a enhacement on ERP_H component.
I added a field to the view Headerdetail called "ZZCCTYPE1", but when I set a value in UI, I haven´t read this field in abap code.
The SET method (SET_ZZCCTYPR1) in the context node is ok, in debug I see that the method current->set_property, is working fine.
I've tried to read the atribute with lr_entity->get_property_as_string ( 'ZZCCTYPR1' ), but doesn´t work. When I read other "standard field", the statement is ok and it has value.
When I set the value of the field from ECC (VA01/VA02), it is kept by the system.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Andrea Ricci

Hi,
To add a new field, you have to first create it through T-Code EEWB where in you create a project, create extension which is assigned to a business object and create the new field through wizard - specifying the field name , type and length.
Once this is done, you can check the new field coming up in available fields for the relevant component's view in Tcode BSP_WD_CMPWB.
Hope this helps you out.
Cheers
Ravindra Valy
"Award Points if it is helpfull"

Enhancing the component ERP_H with a custom field in the web UI

Hi,
I'm facing an error when enhancing the component ERP_H with a custom field in the web UI.
I've followed the steps mentioned in the pdf document called "Enhancement Options for the Lean Order Interface" (Note
1224179):
I´ve done a enhacement on ERP_H component.
I added a field to the view Headerdetail called "ZZCCTYPE1", but when I set a value in UI, I haven´t read this field in abap code.
The SET method (SET_ZZCCTYPR1) in the context node is ok, in debug I see that the method current->set_property, is working fine.
I've tried to read the atribute with lr_entity->get_property_as_string ( 'ZZCCTYPR1' ), but doesn´t work. When I read other "standard field", the statement is ok and it has value.
When I set the value of the field from ECC (VA01/VA02), it is kept by the system.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Andrea Ricci

Hi Pooja,
When you created your custom views, did you bind the view context nodes to the corresponding context nodes of your component controller?
From the exceptions you reported it seems that this binding is missing.
To create this binding, you can right click on your view context node , choose "Create Binding" and bind it to the context nodes of your Component Controller.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nisha

IExpenses-12.1.3 Facing Issue with 2 custom text fields on the standard OAF

Dear All,
We are facing problem where custom text fields on standard OAF page does not retain their values when we traverse back-forth on the OAF page.
Here is the exact issue details
1) We added 2 text fields(Attribute5 and Attribute6) through personalization on Mileage Line Details Screen(standard OAF page) of iExpenses 12.1.3.
2) And business requirement is whenever user enters values into these fields, difference of these values is populated in third field which is standard field on that page.
Issue
When user enters values into above 2 fields, difference is calculated correctly however once he clicks on return page and comes back again on the detail page
then all the standard fields retain their values but 2 custom fields have blank value.
Is there any issue with personalization? or any other issue? Please suggest.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Thanks Pratap for checking
There is button named as "Calculate Amount" on the line details page so it is happening in below 2 scenario
1) When User enters values in 2 fields and clicks on Calculate Amount Button then values get disappeared from custom fields
2) When user clicks on return button, go to main page and clicks on detail button ( to come back on same line) then all the standard fields have valuece and custom one's disappeared.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Issue with Upgrading to 2nd Generation MotoX

Dear Verizon Wireless and Motorola Mobility,
Your 2nd Generation Moto X Upgrade program is fatally flawed and my experience highlights everything that could possibly go wrong when attempting to upgrade an existing plan.
As Verizon replied to my tweet (my twitter name is @melting_plastic), “Getting a new phone should be an exciting time.” but my experience has been everything but that.
My current phone is a Motorola Droid Razr Maxx. This was my first entry into the Android operating system and I fell in love. As a former Blackberry user, I was a bit hesitant to switch but upon receiving this phone in May of 2012, I had nothing but a great experience with it. This experience made want to continue with a Motorola phone upon my next available upgrade and I had waited to upgrade my phone until the newest Motorola phones were announced. I put off my upgrade for over 5 months waiting for the announcement of a new phone with my current phone deteriorating. The battery life has dropped to less than 2 hours and it has begun to freeze constantly with all the upgrades to software that it is unable to handle. Due to these issues, I checked every day waiting for an announcement of the new Moto X to be release and was finally happy when it was announced it would be released on September 27th for Verizon.
On the morning of Friday September 27th, I attempted to order my phone, a 32gb model, through the MotoMaker website and my first issue arose. Even though I was eligible for an upgrade, the MotoMaker website required a credit check for me to upgrade. As I am not the primary account holder, I did not feel comfortable inputting my father's information for a credit check. I also felt it was not necessary as I was paying the $149.99 by my credit card and the account has been with Verizon since the mid 1990's while it was still Bell Atlantic. As I was eligible for an upgrade and not a new account, it seemed a bit much that this credit check was needed. After searching the internet, I found many posts from the original Moto X release about this issue and the solution was to go to a Verizon Wireless store and pre-purchase the phone there and use the provided pin to order the phone at the MotoMaker website.
During my lunch break on September 27th, I visited the Wireless Zone retailer in Malvern Pennsylvania and waited for over 45 minutes to talk to an associate in an attempt to pre-purchase this phone and receive a pin for the website. This associated had no information about the ability to purchase this pin nor could he order the 32gb model directly for me. He apologized to me about the wait and his inability to fulfill my order but recommended me to go to a retail Verizon Wireless store as they may be able to help me.
After returning to work, I decided to attempt to discuss my issue using the Verizon Wireless help chat on its website. The operator suggested to call the Verizon support line and that they should be able to help me on this purchase. I proceeded to place the call, once again waiting on hold for 30 minutes, until I finally was able to talk to a representative. This representative was unable to help me but transferred me to another department that may be able to. After a brief hold, I was transferred to an individual who was finally able to help me out. He informed me that the 32gb model was not in the Verizon system but was expected to be added on October 1st. He apologized for the wait but at least he was able to provide me with valid information.
On Saturday October 4th, I visited the Verizon Retail location in King of Prussia Pennsylvania and once again waited 45 minutes before being seen by a representative. This time I was helped by an associate named Jeremy who knew exactly what I meant by purchasing a pin. After a bit of struggling to properly place the order, the order was placed with the help of a manager, at the price of $199.99 with a $50 mail-in-rebate. This became the 2nd area of disappointment. Not only did I have to wait to purchase this phone but I had to pay an increased rate up front and needed to send in for a mail-in-rebate. I thanked Jeremy for his help and headed back to my residence 15 miles away.
Once home, I attempted to place the order for my phone. As I live 100+ miles away from the primary account address, I had planned to have the phone shipped to my work as I had done when I purchased my Droid Razr Maxx. The MotoMaker website prevented me from changing the shipping address and I was once against frustrated by this process. I used the MotoMaker online support tool and they informed me that I must contact Verizon and they can adjust the shipping address as each PIN has a pre-defined shipping address attached to it.
I called Verizon's technical support line at approximately 4:30PM from my home phone. After once again waiting on hold for half an hour, I was finally connected to an associate and she was very friendly and attempted to help me with my shipping issue. She understood my frustration and placed a 3-way call between her, myself and Motorola support. During this call, she and myself became very frustrated with Motorola support staff as they refused to adjust the shipping address and stated that there was nothing that they could do. She apologized to me and suggested that I return to the King of Prussia location and attempt to sort it out there.
Begrudgingly, I returned to the Verizon location and once again waited to speak to Jeremy. He apologized for my situation and saw the only way to rectify it was to have FedEx adjust the shipment address after it had been shipped. He informed me that any charges that would be incurred to do so would be credited to my account if I returned to the store with the receipt.
I returned home and attempted to place the order again. This time I was able to adjust my shipping address and placed the order. While doing so, I received an error message and was instructed to call Motorola's support line. I called this line at around 7:45PM and spoke to a gentleman named Christian. He opened up support case 141005-006808 and informed me that because of my attempt to change the shipping address, this was why the error occurred. He instructed me to attempt to replace the order using the original supplied address and e-mail account and that I “must” use the Chrome web browser. This statement of having to use the Chrome browser was a complete fallacy and he refused to accept that any other browser could be used to properly order the phone. I installed the Chrome browser, attempted to order the phone and this time I was informed that my PIN was already used, likely during the original failed attempt. Christian informed me that he must escalate the issue and it would take an additional 24-48 hours. The simple act of creating a new PIN should not take this amount of time.
On Monday October 6th, I was finally able to get in contact with another associate from Motorola who was instantly able to create a new PIN for me. I once again placed the order and this time it went through with no issue, order number 00789348. The only disappointment was that I now had to wait until “approximately October 27th” to receive my new phone. During my waiting period, I periodically check the MotoMaker website and during that time, noticed that they offered an additional $50 discount on the Verizon Moto X which would have brought my total down to $99.99. So on top of the additional wait and disappointment, I had now paid $100 over the current price through MotoMaker .
On Tuesday, October 22nd, I finally received the e-mail stating that my phone had shipped and was due to arrive in Forked River, NJ on October 23rd. Using the FedEx website, I attempted to adjust my shipping address to my work, at the cost of $30 and a delay until Friday October 24th. I was unable to perform this action and then attempted to adjust the shipping address to the location I would be at Friday night (my sister's house) for the same delay, but only a cost of $5. Once again I was unable to perform this action and decided to call FedEx directly. After speaking to the associate at FedEx, she informed me that the only way to adjust the address was to have the shipper, Motorola Mobility adjust the address. With my previous issues with Motorola, I knew that this request would be denied. At this point, my only recourse is to have my parents ship me the phone to my work once they receive it on October 23rd. Even then, I'm unsure if FedEx will leave the phone at the location without a signature if no one is there to sign for it, which is why I attempted to ship the phone to my work.
At this point, I'm extremely dissatisfied with both Verizon and Motorola with how this whole situation has transpired. I feel a though I should have purchased an Apple iPhone 6 even though I am not a fan of the iOS platform or a different Android OS manufacturer. As a Fios account holder, I am also tempted to switch to the competition after 3+ years of being a customer. I feel that both Motorla and Verizon failed to rectify any hardship I had experienced in my attempt to purchase this phone and even now fear that I will not receive my phone in time to mail in mail-in-rebate which needs to be postmarked by November 1st.

MPerreca, This is quite a lot for you to have to go through! We surely don't want to lose your business as we appreciate your loyalty with us. I understand the challenges that can come in needing the shipping address changed on your phone orders. I'm glad to learn that the phone is now on it's way.
I'm confident that you'll be fine with submitting the rebate for your phone. If you do run into troubles with the submission, please let us know. You can also pre-submit your rebate information, here: http://bit.ly/1kKwKJK. Let us know if you have further concerns.
TanishaS1_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Deleting AET custom field from the SAP tableu2019s level.

Hi experts,
I am deleting few un-used custom fields in AET. I am able to see delete symbol as status in AET. Although deleted custom fields are present in lot of structure and tables (eg: CRMD_ORDERADM_H) in SAP GUI tables. I want to delete the custom field from SAP GUI tables and structures.
I tried to delete custom field from the SAP GUI tableu2019s level. But it is not allowing.
Please get me some clue on deleting custom field from the SAP GUI tableu2019s level.
Thanks in advance
Chand

Hi,
The deletion of custom field in AET happens in two steps:
1. You select a custom field that you want to delete, than you press on the delete icon in the Custom Field Assignment Block.
Doing this, you mark the selected custom field to be deleted.
2. You press on "Save and Generate" button. The "Save" will persist the deletion mark of the custom field. It means the custom field is marked to be deleted in the database. The "Generate" will process all the deletion of objects which are needed to delete the custom field, for example: Domain, Data Element, Append, etc.
If the "Generate" does not happen due any reason, the deletion mark is already persisted in DB. It means, later on if you go back to AET, you will see that the custom field is marked to be deleted, but it is not yet deleted.
If you do not press "Save and Generate" button at all, it means, you do not persist the deletion mark in DB. Later on if you go back to AET, you won't see that the custom field marked to be deleted.
Note: Please make sure, "Generation" is only applied for field that is flagged to be generated. The "Generate" flag column is by default hidden. You can use personlization to show the column.
Regards,
Steve

Issue with the material field in ME23N after upgrade

Hi Experts,
We are having an issue with transaction ME23N in ECC6.0 after upgrade from 4.6c.
In this transaction for the given PO the value of the material is not populating. The material coloumn is displaying but the value of the material is not coming.
For the same PO with the same data we are able to see the material number in ME23N in 4.6c.
Please help me to resolve this.
Thanks,
Rakesh

Hi,
If you are a functional consultant then check the configuration settings in SPRO and compare it with the one in 4.6c system to find if the material number display in ME23N is enabled in your new system or not. Go to tcode SPRO and Material Management-> Purchasing->Purchase Order->Define Screen Layout at Document level.
Execute this and select on ME21N or tcode that you are having problem with. Then press details button and double click on Enjoy fields. Check if it Display check box is ticked or not.
KR Jaideep,

Issues with DNG Flat Field Plug-in after installing updates

Hello,
First of all many thanks to the Lightroom-team for making the DND Flat Field Plug-in available. I am using it to correct images taken with non-retrofocus M-mount lenses on a Sony NEX-7. I have previously used CornerFix, which worked fine, but the workflow in conjunction with Lighroom isn't really convenient.
Now to the issue I am facing: initially, the plug-in worked very well, but after installing all recent CS6 updates, I am now receiving the following after selecting the reference image:
A new DNG-file is still created, with some adjustments being made, but it looks like not all vignetting and color casts are being corrected. After dismissing the above message, Lightroom keeps showing the flat field correction task as still in progress:
This can be cancelled, and I can continue to use LR without any problems. When I attempt another flat field correction, I face the same issue.
Has anyone else experienced this issue? And is it possibly correlated with the installation of a specific CS6 update (of which there have been quite a few over the past week or so)?
I should probably note that I'm running LR 4.2 on Mac OS X 10.7.5 and a Mac Pro 2008 with 24GB RAM.
TIA for any feedback!
Best,
Ron

I had the exact same issue with LR4.2, that is until yesterday. Then I did not get the error but I did not get the flat field image either. All I got was the original image indicating that it was in a group of two but the second image was not there. Tried synchronize but no image was indicated.as available. Processing did not hang and indicated that it went to completion. Must be a problem with 4.2 as it worked with 4.1. With 4.1 I got no grouping, just a new file with "ff" appended to the name.
Asside: I am using a shift adapter with a E-M5 and 28mm OM legacy lens. I shoot three images for a pano, then set the shift back to starting point and shoot three flat field image. Problem (not Adobe's fault) it that I often forget to shoot the flat fliel images. Break down to move on and then realize - Oh Crap! When I remember and using 4.1 it works well.
Larry

Issues with a Z field in an append structure of VBAP when calling BAPI

We have added a Z field on table VBAP with an append structure. It is a flag field. We want to change its value with the BAPI BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE. We have also created the append structure in API structures
THe return message of the bapi gives us a success message for the modification. But when we go to the se16 we still see the field as blank, not with the X suposed to be there.
We are succesfully calling the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
What can cause us this problem? What can we do to solve it??
Thank you!
Artur.

Hi Artur,
this blog could help you:
[Updating custom fields on VBAP and VBAK using BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2|/people/kevin.wilson2/blog/2009/09/30/updating-custom-fields-on-vbap-and-vbak-using-bapisalesordercreatefromdat2]
Regards,
Andrea

Issue with EAN/UPC field in "BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA"

Hello guys,
I have a requirement where I am using the BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to create a new material by using a reference material. The question is how can i pass EAN/UPC field into it?
This field exists in Basic Data1 tab in MM01 screens. I am not getting how to pass values into the INTERNATIONALARTNOS type BAPI_MEAN ?? This is there as table parameters in the BAPI?
Please advice

Hi
Issue with BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA
Bapi_material_savedata help with parameters
Regards
Pavan

Problem with the custom field - enabling

hi,
i am using one customer field in the shopping card header , and using BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to issue an error message if this field is left empty.
but the problem comes after the error message is issues , this field becomes disabled , and the user has to go back , and again come to the order screen to enter the value and order the cart.
i have tried all possible options , to keep the customer field enabled , but not able to do so.
have you got any inputs for me..
Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Aug 21, 2008 12:29 PM

Hi,
Have you checked the BBP_CUF_BADI_2 implementation in your system ??
May be some logic there is disabling the customer field right after the error message is generated..
Thanks,
Pradeep

Issues With AET custom field generation,EHP1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for