It should be possible to close a thread without saying it's answered.

It should be possible to close a thread without saying it's answered.
Maybe closed - resolved or closed - not resolved.
Edited by: Mike Angelastro on Jan 29, 2010 6:43 AM

Mark it answered may not mean your question is answered.  If you do not satisfy all replies, you simply do not assign any points.  Everyone will know it is not answered.  You may post the last message as No satisfied answer.
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

  • Possible to close the display without turning in to Safe Sleep???

    Does anyone know if its possible to close the display without turning into sasfe sleep???
    It would be useful while working with the a big externel dispay like the cinema display.
    thanks
    macbook   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    Actually, I don't think you need to have it plugged in.
    This: "You can use your MacBook in lid closed mode if the computer is connected to an external display, keyboard, and mouse."
    Came from this article: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303722#800

  • Is it possible to close a app without the homebutton

    my homebutton is broke and now i can't close any appe.
    Does somebody know how i can close app's without the homebutton?

    i understand that.
    But i won't do that, because the launch op the iphone 4S is the 28e.
    But i think it's strange that you can do nothing with the iphone when 1 button don't work.
    Normally on devices there are 2 or 3 options to close something.

  • How to "kill" AWT Event Queue thread without using System.exit()?

    When I run my program and the first GUI window is displayed a new thread is created - "AWT-Event Queue". When my program finishes, this thread stays alive and I think it causes some problems I have experienced lately.
    Is there any possibility to "kill" this thread without using System.exit() (I can't use it for some specific reasons)

    All threads are kept alive by the JVM session. When you use System.exit(int) you kill the current session, thus killing all threads. I'm not sure, though...
    What you could do, to make sure all threads die, is to make ever thread you start member of a thread group. When you want to exit you app, you kill all the threads in the thread group before exit.
    A small example:
    //Should be declared somewhere
    static ThreadGroup threadGroup = new ThreadGroup("My ThreadGroup");
    class MyClass extends Thread {
    super(threadGroup, "MyThread");
    Thread thread = new Thread(threadGroup, "MySecondThread");
    void exit() {
    //Deprecated, seek alternative
    threadGroup.stop();
    System.exit(0);
    }

  • How to close other thread's InputStream?

    Hi,
    I am developing a multithreaded "JAVA CONSOLE APPLICATION".
    Brief description of application is like this:
    On initialising, application starts a new thread. In that it listens for the keyboard input from the user(System.in.read()). But it listens only for some time (5 seconds). After this time, this should be stopped and in main thread which is listening for the server application, should display information from the server and listen for the keyboard input from the user.
    But the problem is, it listens for two keyboard inputs. 1 in main thread and another in other thread as it doesn't get closed even though the thread is stopped.
    So how to close that InputStream so that application should listen for keyboard only in main thread?
    Thanx in Advance,
    Sameer Mahajan

    Not really sure if this works, as your description isn't clear.
    But for sockets, the following works :
    public void run { //the Threads/Runnable run method
       try {
          //do your stuff
       } finally {
          try {
             is.close(); //supposed 'is' is your InputStream
          } catch (IOException e) {}
    }Now, whenever the thread terminates, the InputStream will be closed.
    Maybe even if you use Thread.stop(), but this is deprecated,
    so better use Thread.interrupt() and flags.

  • Is it possible to create a thread and run it in background in nokia ??

    Is it possible to create a thread and run it in background in nokia series 40 mobile phones using j2me ??

    Probably a good question for ForumNokia. If you mean start up a thread and run in the background while your MIDlet UI does other things, then sure, why not. If you mean that you want to exit your MIDlet, but leave a thread running in the background, then I don't believe you can do this on series 40. S60 is another story since it supports multiple tasks.

  • It should be possible to set default behavior for all file types

    It should be possible to set a default action for all file types. I'm so tired of having to manually sit and say "save this file" because Firefail always defaults to "open with" and has disabled the "Do this automatically for files like this from now on."
    And spare me the zealotry religious excuses for why its the fault of websites and not Firefail
    ''edited to remove swearing''

    I do want users to have full control to be able to set any folder view they want by using Apply to Folders; I just want to set the initial/default view to Detail because that matches what the majority of my users want.
    That is, what registry setting changes when I go to a picture folder, change the view to Detail, and click Apply to Folders? Having done that, I still retain the ability to change it to some other view and apply that to folders. But what registry setting
    represents the change I just made when applying Detail view to all Picture folders.?
    This settings is simple via GUI, but it is related a lot of registry keys, I made a test in my machine, capture the "Apply to Folders" process using Regshot tool (this is a small tool which can compare the regsitry changes after you change some
    settings), and this is the result:
    this is part of the registry changes, a plenty of registry keys and values need to be changed. hard to list them here. if you have interests, I recommend the tool Regshot, it can help you capture the regsitry changes.
    NOTE: Please Note: The third-party product discussed here is manufactured by a company that is
    independent of Microsoft. We make no warranty, implied or otherwise, regarding this product's
    performance or reliability.
    Yolanda Zhu
    TechNet Community Support

  • What should I do if the iphoto keeps on saying that "Plz wait for import to complete" when i click the close button but it is not importing photos? How can I close the iPhoto? I try to switch my mac off but it doesn't work. Thanks.

    What should I do if the iphoto keeps on saying that "Plz wait for import to complete" when i click the close button but it is not importing photos? How can I close the iPhoto? I try to switch my mac off but it doesn't work. Thanks.

    You should be able to select Force Quit from the menu beneath the Apple icon in Finder
    and choose to Quit iPhoto from there, without messing up the Mac OS X in the process.
    OS X - Support
    Not sure if rebuilding the iPhoto library would help this issue. However if you had to
    turn off the computer without the correct method (unplug, etc; instead of menu choice)
    the system may have accrued damages and should be checked, maybe repaired by
    use of the Disk Utility in the system. Or restart the computer in Safe Boot mode, then
    run 'repair disk permissions' while it is running in that reduced mode; then restart after.
    •Understanding Safe Mode - tuts+ computer skills tutorial:
    http://computers.tutsplus.com/tutorials/understanding-safe-mode--mac-59897
    •OS X: What is Safe Boot, Safe Mode?
    Suggestions on how to use Safe Mode in article, to resolve issues, may be helpful.
    There likely are other means to rectify troublesome applications, including reinstall.
    Be sure to backup your music, image, video, and other work on an external drive
    or suitable device as a precaution against loss should there be a hard drive failure.
    iPhoto - Mac Apps - Apple Support
    There should be some tips and help information using iPhoto via this tiny Support link.
    Good luck & happy computing!

  • Is it possible to combine 2 Threading Database Items?

    Is is possible to combine multiple Threading Database Items in HCM Extract? I am trying to extract the Personal Details ( i.e just Employee Name, Person Number, Primary Email Address etc.) and Assignment Details (i.e. Salary Details, Department, etc.) in file. I need to extract the new employees and changes using Threading Database item option. Please let me know the relevant option for it or let me know how can we combine Person and Assignment Threading Database Items.

    I am not HCM expert so I am not sure what "combine multiple Threading Database Items" means in this context. You may find this blog post covering various tools useful specifically the link to the HCM extract documentation that contains a concrete example ..
    Jani Rautiainen
    Fusion Applications Developer Relations                             
    https://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel/

  • SCN - How do I close the Thread of communication

    SCN - How do I close the Thread of communication
    Sanjay

    By changing the status of your discussion.
    from Not Answered to Answered or Assumed Answered.
    Also read the blog to know more How to close a discussion and why

  • After implementing EHP3, is it possible to close/open MM posting period at

    Hi,
    After implementing EHP3, is it possible to close/open MM posting period at segment level ? Do you people have any idea?
    Is there any way to close/open MM posting period at a level lower than company code?
    Regards,
    Jayant

    No, the period is at company code level. This is same as FI.

  • Is it possible to close the MacBookPro display

    Is it possible to close the MacBookPro display without getting it to sleep?
    I want to close the display and leave the computer working

    Try SleepLess…
    http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/17893
    … else InsomniaX…
    http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/30315

  • Catching all possible exceptions in gui thread

    Hi,
    I have such a problem: I am developing Swing app and sometimes it crashes by throwing an Exception which I don't catch. The effect is that this exception prints stack trace on System.err but user is not notified and wonders what is happening... I would prefer to show custom ErrorDialog with stacktrace.
    I am searching for simple and effective way to catch every possible exception thrown from within any library. I think of a few ways from which everyone has some disadvantages.
    The ideal way would be replacing AWT event queue dispatcher so I could process every GUI event inside try { } catch (Exception e) {} block. That would be a good place to catch all exceptions. Unfortunately I don't know if it is possible.
    For now I am trying such a solution:
    I start background thread together with main app. Then I redirect System.err and System.out streams to PipedStream connected to this background thread. This thread can analyze anything that is going to System.err and maybe recognize potential exception stacktraces. Then it can notify main thread of an exception. But it is not ideal as I have to parse the stream and it can always be not ideal in exception recognition. And the code is quite costly.
    Do you have any ideas, had similar problems?

    But how can I cause GUI thread to run in my thread
    group? As I suppose GUI thread is started by JVM and
    is something separate from my code - I can get a
    reference to GUI thread but don't know how to
    manipulate or replace it...One alternative is to completely separate the GUI code from your code.
    Your code, which is wrapped in appropriate try/catch blocks, runs on its own thread and does its own processing. When it's done with that processing, it queues the results on the event thread for display. If an exception occurs during your processing, then you queue something that notifies the GUI.
    The simplest way to implement this is to spawn a new thread for each operation. The Runnable that you give to that thread looks like the following:
    public MyOperationClass implements Runnable
        public void run()
            try
                // do your exception-generating code here
                SwingUtilities.invokeLater( new MyGUIUpdateClass(param1, param2));
            catch (Exception e)
                SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new MyExceptionReporter(e));
    }This is only a bare-bones solution (and hasn't been compiled). Since it separates the GUI from actual processing, you'll probably want to display a wait cursor while the processing thread is doing its thing. You'll probably end up implementing a class that implements this pattern. You may also want to create a producer-consumer thread, so that the user won't invoke, say, a dozen different operations at once.
    However, this sort of code is absolutely essential to Swing programming. Most apps do extensive non-GUI processing, such as database queries. If you run such queries in the GUI thread, your GUI will freeze.
    Sun has named this pattern "SwingWorker", although I don't think they've fleshed it out very fully: http://java.sun.com/products/jfc/tsc/articles/threads/threads2.html

  • Is it possible to close all MDI Sheet?

    Is it possible to close all MDI sheet in a MDI application window without losing
    the toolbar? It works in 6i client/server mode but no in web applet.
    Any idea?
    Thanks.

    It's very annoying having to do all those extra steps to truly close an app after I exit it. It wastes my battery and eats into my 200MB monthly bandwidth. Worst. Feature. Ever.
    Even turning my phone off and then back on doesn't clear the multi-task tray. I really do have to manually close every app now. If it wasn't for the homepage wallpaper feature (which I've wanted forever), I would revert my OS without hesitation. But I love the homepage wallpaper too much.
    I am extremely grateful that the 3G does not support multi-tasking. If it did, trying to explain to my wife how to manually close her apps all the time so her battery didn't die prematurely would cause so much headache I'd probably have to buy her a non-iPhone. Even if she grasped what she was supposed to do, the tediousness of it would make her mad that I ever convinced her to get an iPhone. As it stands, I now I have a reason not to get her an iPhone 4 when I eventually do, even though I looked forward to being able to FaceTime with her.

  • I have an IPad2.  I've received two different ideas on charging the battery.  One person indicates I should let the battery run almost down before recharging; another person indicated I should keep it charged closer to 100% .  What is the best process?

    I have an IPad2.  I've received two different ideas on charging the battery.  One person indicates I should let the battery run almost down before recharging; another person indicated I should keep it charged closer to 100% .  What is the best process for the best battery life over time?

    I do exactly as Thomas Reed does. Always have from day one. Going on 15 months now and I get at least 10 hours of use out the battery every day. No matter how much juice is left on the device when I go to bed - I put the iPad on the charger - doesn't matter what the battery gauge says - I plug it in and let it charge all night.

Maybe you are looking for