Item level status not updated

Hi gurus,
My problem is in the search result screen from Check Status Transaction. When it is create da SC (from Describe requirement or Internal Goods) and the PO is also created, item level status should be Purchase Order Created. However, the status is Approved. The PO is correctly created and it has already been sent to the vendor. Even the lorry icon and invoice icon are able.
If the SC comes from a catalog item, then it is working ok.
Do you know how to solved my issue?
I am working with SRM 5.0 and Extended classic scenario.
Many thanks!
Patrícia

HI,
Try this link
How Incoterms gets defaulted for STO
Regards
KK

Similar Messages

Incoterms on Item level is not updated on STO.

Issue: they have created a STO with wrog incoterm, now the issue is that the Incoterms on PO--> Item level is not updated if Incoterms on Header level is changed. I suggested them to change incoterm on item level manually, but user is saying the problem is that SAP doesn't change automatically Incoterms on item level if Incoterms on Header level are changed??
What user is saying..Is this correct? or any thoughts/solution to fix this issue?
Can anyone suggest me on this?
Thanks & Regards
Suresh Babu

HI,
Try this link
How Incoterms gets defaulted for STO
Regards
KK

How to find the header and item level status of a CRM contract ?

Hi,
Few questions
A. How to find the header and item level status of a CRM contract ? My req is to select all the contract line items which are in CLOSED status.
B. How to get the BPs associated with a contract ?
Anyone have the list of CRM tables and the relation amongst them. Please mail me in [email protected]

CRMD_ORDERADM_H     Contains the Header Information for a Business Transaction.
Note:
1.     It doesnt store the Business Partner
       responsible for the transaction. To
       get the Partner No, link it with
       CRM_ORDER_INDEX.
2.     This table can be used for search
       based on the Object Id(Business
       Transaction No).
CRMD_CUSTOMER_H     Additional Site Details at the Header Level of a Business Transaction
CRMD_LINK     Transaction GUID set for all the Business Transactions
CRMD_ORDER_INDEX     Contains Header as well as Item details for a Business Transaction.
Note:
1.     It doesnt store the Business
      Transaction No (Object ID).
      To get the Business Transaction No
      link the table with
      CRMD_ORDERADM_H
2.   This table can be used for search
      based on the Partner No
CRMD_ORDERADM_I     Stores the Item information for a Business Transaction. The scenarios where we have a Contract Header and within contract we have Line Items for the contract, this table can be useful.
E.g. Service Contracts
CRMD_CUSTOMER_I     Additional Site Details at the Item Level of a Service Contract
Pl.reward points.......

Delivery address at Item Level and not at the Header Level

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

It is standard process only.
In Po delivery address is maintained at item level because to which address perticular material to be delivered,
this may change from material to material or may not change

Item level security not working when placed in a portlet page

I have three page links linking to separate pages and have two of them with item level security turned on for specific groups with view privilges. I have the access for those groups with view privilges in the page level as well. I have published that as portlet and placed the portlet in another page which has view priviliges for the groups specified in item level as well.
But I notice that when i place the portlet in a page, the item level security is not working.
Item Level Security Not Working for Items Placed on a page and published as portlet and placed in another page. Is there some work around for this.
Thanks
Valli

Would you please clarify for me? Is the problem that unauthorized people can see the portlet, or that unauthorized people can see the links?

PO item change is not updated after Delivery completion

Dear All,
PO item change is not updated in the PO at the completion of the delivery.for a particular line item. In our QA system, its updated but client is facing an issue with the production system. Pls check the attached screen which I got from QA. There is no such log in the production system. Kindly help me to have a solution for this.
Regards
Sujith

Hi Dev,
After we post the GR for a PO line item, PO history is updated (line) and at the same time that particular change log is available under PO line item. But in production system, said log is not updated after GR is completed fully.
Rgs
Sujith

Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

HI Paul,
Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
Can you plz some insite into this?
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
RKS

Delivery address at Item level and not at Header level in PO

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated,
Regards,
RKS

This may be an old note, but it may point you in the right direction: Note 450425 - Delivery Address creates individual R/3 address number.
If you debug the function module in SRM that creates the PO in ECC, you can check if this is the case.
Regards,
Robin

ASCP Taking Lead time to buy Item from Item Level and not from ASL

Hi All.
We have a buy Item Which is used at multiple Organization now we have defined processing Lead time for this Item at Item Level and ASL level (Global) However for different organization Like ABC and XYZ we have same supplier and Supplier Site for this item,
Below is the details of Item
Item's Processing Lead Time at Item Level
Org - ABC - 35
Org - XYZ - 15
Item's Processing Lead Time at ASL Level
Org - ABC - 10
Org - XYZ - 5
Now when we run ASCP plan for org XYZ and check for exception, Item's Lead time is coming from Item Level (15) not from ASL Level (Does this is expected behavior from Oracle?)
Regards.

Hi Abhishek,
I tested one more time with the same scenario, this time ASCP is considering Processing lead time form ASL only however it is considering processing lead time for another organization (When I am running ASCP plan for Org XYZ ASCP is considering Processing lead time for ABC).
Does it is due to same supplier site for both the organization?
Also it has an active sourcing rule for the same supplier
Regards.

PGI status at delivery header level has not updated

Dear Friends,
We had created deliver, picking was completed and PGI was completed successfully. However when we try to create Billing, an error occurs stating that PGI is not completed.
Further when we check the delivery, the Goods Issue status at item level is completed but at the Header level the GM is B which is partially completed. In the Document flow we can see the PGI Status is completed.
I think there might be some table which was not update. Is there any way to update the status in the delivery?
Further we tried to reverse the PGI through VL09, but system is not able to find the delivery ..this might be because the system might be checking in some table where the statues has not updated.
Please suggest me how should I complete this.

HI,
Go to transaction "SE16N" and enter table "VBUK" and give the delivery number in the field sales document number. Now you type "&SAP_EDIT" in the transaction bar and execute. Here you can change the status(Total goods movement). And see If you can actually bill the document. Kindly please let me know If you need any more information on this.
Regards,
Ram Pedarla

CRM line item status not updated when delivery is deleted in ECC

Hi All,
When order is created in CRM it gets replicated to ECC.When delivery is created in ECC, the System Status in CRM at the line item level is changed to completed and also Delivery completed status is created in CRm..
Now when we delete the delivery, the Delivery completed status is deleted in CRM but the Completed status is not changed to In Process.It remains as Completed.This used to work fine before we applied support packs last weekend.We are currently at support pack level 10 for CRM.
Please advice
Thanks and Regards

In CRM4 standard, changes to orders in R/3 or ECC do not replicate back to CRM
Check out this SAPnote
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/710874

SC Item in Transfer process active - follow on document status not updated

Hi Gurus,
    Follow on document is not updated in SRM after PO creation. Ours is classic scenario (SRM 5.5, ECC6.0) and passed thru the following steps - SC (FFT) created, document approved, sent to SoCo, purchaser assigned vendor and created PO, PO created in ECC.
In SRM SoCo screen displays message 'PO created 45xxxxxxxxxx' successfully. Checked the BE PO 45xxxxxxx that was created successfully.
Ran BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP jobs. jobs finished successfully. But status is not updated in SRM. RZ20/SLG1 does not have any errors.
BBP_PD shows following statuses:
     I105   Awaiting Approval         X
     I1021 Created
     I1038 Complete
     I1106 SC ordered
     I1129 Approved
     I1111 Item in Transfer process
                    The last status I1111 is still active.
Any advise are welcome. Not sure if I am missing any OSS Notes.
Regards
Viktor Paul

Hi,
1. Check in table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB if the entry exists use CLEAN_REQREQ_UP program.
2. If entry in the table not exists then check in transaction BBP_PD if the follow on document ( PO ) Number reserved for
the SC .. then use FM BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT.
3. none of these use normal process execute BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER And then use CLEAN_REQREQ_UP
Thanks,
prasad.s

Item level changes not being updated.

Hi,
I am implementing BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, method BBP_PO_CHANGE.
The problem that I am facing is that whenever, I change anything at the Item level, after the PO has been created, (say for eg item quantity), it is not being updated to the database. I also noticed one thing. When I click on the order button (after changing the item quantity) the import parameter of the BADI it_item of the is empty. Also I am checking in transaction BBP_PD, whether the update has happened.
Thanks in advance
Pete

Hi Yann,
Below is the code in the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.
method IF_EX_BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI~BBP_PO_CHANGE.
CLASS cl_exithandler DEFINITION LOAD.
DATA: LV_CUF_BADI TYPE REF TO IF_EX_BBP_CUF_BADI, "ZCL_IM_SRM_TANDC_BADI, ",
LV_CUF_BADI_ACTIVE.
DATA: IV_MODE   TYPE xfeld,
        IS_CUF_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_HEADER,
        IS_GETDET_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_D,
        ES_UPD_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_D,
        IS_UPD_HEADER TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_HEADER_U,
        LV_CHANGE TYPE C,
        IS_ITEM TYPE BBP_PDS_ITEM ,
        IS_ACC TYPE BBP_PDS_ACC,
        IV_DOC_TYPE TYPE CRMD_ORDERADM_H-OBJECT_TYPE VALUE 'BUS2201',
        LV_INCLUDE_NAME TYPE DD03P-TABNAME VALUE 'INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_SSF_PO',
        LT_DDIC TYPE DD03TTYP,
        LV_REPID TYPE SY-REPID,
        LV_DYNNR TYPE SY-DYNNR,
        I_HEADER LIKE IS_CUF_HEADER,
        GV_CLAUSE_ID(256) TYPE C,
        LV_FLAG(1),
        LV_IMP(1),
        LS_COUNTER(1),
        LS_COUNT(1),
        LS_NUMB(1),
        LS_GUID(32),
        LS_GUID_INIT(32),
        LS_GUID_BLANK(32) TYPE C VALUE SPACE,
        LS_NUMB_BLANK(1) TYPE C VALUE SPACE,
        LS_CNT(1),
        LV_UCOMM(4),
        EV_OKCODE TYPE SY-UCOMM.
DATA: WA_PDHSC TYPE BBP_PDHSC,
WA_PDHSC_SEL TYPE BBP_PDHSC,
*wa_it_item type BBPT_PD_PO_ITEM_ICU,
WA_IT_ITEM TYPE BBP_PDS_PO_ITEM_ICU,
wa_et_item TYPE BBP_PO_ITEM_BADI,
WA_HCF TYPE BBP_PDS_HCF_PO.
LS_COUNTER = LS_COUNTER + 1.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE'.
IMPORT LV_TEXT TO LV_IMP FROM MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
LV_IMP = LV_IMP + 1.
EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ENDIF.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'CHEC' OR SY-UCOMM = 'ENT1' OR SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'LIST'.
GET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD LS_NUMB.
IF LS_NUMB IS INITIAL.
    MOVE IS_HEADER-GUID TO LS_GUID_INIT.
    MOVE LS_COUNTER TO LS_COUNT.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD LS_GUID_INIT.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD LS_COUNT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING IS_HEADER TO I_HEADER.
IMPORT LV_TEXT TO LV_IMP FROM MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
IF SY-UCOMM = 'SAVE' AND LV_IMP = 2.
CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
EXPORTING
exit_name = 'BBP_CUF_BADI'
IMPORTING
act_imp_existing = LV_CUF_BADI_ACTIVE
CHANGING
instance = LV_CUF_BADI.
MOVE SY-UCOMM TO LV_UCOMM.
LV_REPID = 'SAPLZSRM_CUST_SCREEN'.
LV_DYNNR = '1001'.
GET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD LS_GUID.
IF LS_GUID NE IS_HEADER-GUID.
I_HEADER-GUID = LS_GUID.
ENDIF.
CALL METHOD LV_CUF_BADI->PUT_DATA
EXPORTING
          is_header             = I_HEADER
          is_item               = IS_ITEM
          is_acc                = IS_ACC
          iv_doc_type           = 'BUS2201'
          iv_include_name       = lv_include_name
          iv_mode               = IV_MODE
          it_dd03p              = lt_ddic
          iv_caller_dynnr       = '1000'
          iv_caller_repid       = SY-REPID
        IMPORTING
          ev_repid              = LV_REPID
          ev_dynnr              = LV_DYNNR.
CALL METHOD LV_CUF_BADI->GET_DATA
    IMPORTING
      ev_okcode = EV_OKCODE
    CHANGING
      es_header = I_HEADER
      es_item   = IS_ITEM
      es_acc    = IS_ACC.
ENDIF.
WA_PDHSC-GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
WA_PDHSC-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND = I_HEADER-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING IS_HEADER to ES_HEADER.
MOVE IT_PARTNER TO ET_PARTNER.
loop at it_item into wa_it_item.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING wa_it_item to wa_et_item.
append wa_et_item to et_item.
endloop.
MOVE IT_ACC TO ET_ACC.
MOVE IT_HCF TO ET_HCF.
MOVE IT_ICF TO ET_ICF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING WA_PDHSC TO WA_HCF.
APPEND WA_HCF TO ET_HCF.
IF LV_UCOMM = 'SAVE' AND LV_IMP = 2.
SELECT * INTO WA_PDHSC_SEL FROM BBP_PDHSC WHERE GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
ENDSELECT.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    UPDATE BBP_PDHSC SET ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND = WA_PDHSC-ZZ_OPT_TERM_COND WHERE GUID = IS_HEADER-GUID.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD SPACE.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD SPACE.
    CLEAR LV_IMP.
    EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ELSE.
    INSERT INTO BBP_PDHSC VALUES WA_PDHSC.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'GUID' FIELD SPACE.
    SET PARAMETER ID 'NUMB' FIELD SPACE.
    CLEAR LV_IMP.
    EXPORT LV_TEXT FROM LV_IMP TO MEMORY ID 'TEXT'.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK.
ENDIF.
endmethod.
Let me know if you need any clarifications.
Thanks,
Pete

Error in psa level - Request not updated to any data target using delta

Hi,
This is pavan and am facing this issue any one know for below issue to solve.
Data Flow is BW Version and Implemented in BI 7.20 version.The issue was data has come
to psa level but from here it is not updated to infocube so for that i have tried update manually
it is showing information that 1334 SID IS SMALLER THAN / EQUAL TO 47287 CANCELLED.
In Process Chain DTP is not included so how can i update data to infocube with out disturbing process chain
Regards,
Pavan Kumar

Hi Pavan Kumar ,
Please log on Tcode RSRQ -then give old request number (I think in your case 1334 is old request number),
and you will get monitor for that request then change the QM status to red after that load new request .
Thanks
Hanumanthu

Fixed Value Date at line item level is not in changable mode when copied

Dear SDN Team,
Hi i have a problem in the Fixed Value date at the line item level in the Return sales order.
The Problem is When creating the return order with reference to the scheduling agreement (10.03.2010). In the Return sales Order at the line item level the fixed value date is coping from scheduling agreement item (fixed value date eg: 31.12.2009)
But i would like to have the fixed value date in the return order as 10.03.2010 but the field is greyed out.
But normally when the sales document is created with reference to the preceding document the same will be copied. But field is greyed out and it is not in changable mode.
Can any one help how to solve this.
I have checked also SAP Note where i did not find any messages.
In normal scenario - when the order is created without any reference the fixed value date is in changable mode until the document is in open.
Pleas help me to resolve this.
With Regards,
Jai

Hi Lakshmipathi,
I am sharing the resolution which was done to this requirement.
We have a specific condition type with statisticaly used and with routine to have KWERT with zero value,
Based on the different key combination. We have a specific key combination for the SA and SDoc and for this we need to maintain a condition record for the condition type with fixed value date and which will be linked to only the specific document. Once this is done.
We need to do update pricing in the sales order for the particular line item. by doing this the Fixed value date will be changed in the particular line item.
Thanks and Regards,
Jana

Item level status not updated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for