IW31 Problems with IW21 Required Fields

Here is the scenario of my issue;
IW21 has the priority field set as a required field.
So when users create a work order in IW31 - who wish to create both a work order and Notification simultaneously - get the error, "Field priority require".  They'll have to go into the notification and select the priority then.
My question is - is there a way to have the WO priorty synch with the notification priority?  to copy automatically?

Hi,
There is not any option to synchronise priority from order to notification. It is possible that the order and notification may not have the same set of priority values.
If the priority value on notification is not always required then the customizing can be adjusted to switch off mandatory setting. Customizing could also be adjusted so that notification type was used as a influencing field. That means only specified notification types would have a mandatory requirement on priority field. That would be ideal if your manually created (IW21) notifications had different notification type from the automatically (IW31) generated ones.
Another option is to switch off the mandatory check completely. If then necessary a user exit could be used to check if priority is filled when notification created from IW21.
-Paul

Similar Messages

  • Problem with the quantity field

    hi every one
    i am facing a problem with the quantity field (vbap-kwmeng)
    as per my requirement i need to display this quantity field along with some other item fields from VBAP in an alv grid.
    among all the fields displayed in the alv grid only this quantity field is editable(end user can change this quantity)
    once end user changes this quantity and press save button i need to capture this new quantity in my internaltable.
    problem is input of length of quantity is 15 and the output length is 19
    so when i am pressing save
    say my quantity is 50 when i am pressing save '0.050' is coming because of the length difference
    how can i capture the original changed value.
    vamsi

    what about define two fields in  you inner table ,one as char and the other as vbap-kwmeng, you can show the char one in the ALV gird , when user input value and press SAVE ,you can move the value to vbap-kwmeng.
    you can test it,mybe some one has one better idea.

  • Problem with a Dynpro field (type numc)

    hi everybody.
    I'm developping a ModulPool application in wich i have 2 RadioButtons with 2 textbox fields.
    What i pretend to do is, when the user clicks a radiobutton and strikes Intro, enable the corresponding textbox field and disable the other one.
    My code runs fine, but i have a little problem. When I loop the screen table, to set the appropiate value to the 'input' property, in this case, when i try to disable it (input = '0'), I get a zero character in that field. This field has NUMC type, i'm sure this is the problem
    'cos i've got no problem with the other field (type char). But i can't solve it.
    Anybody's got an idea?
    Thanks

    What you are seeing is the normal behavior of a numeric field represented by the SAPgui.  This is how all numeric fields are displayed via SAPgui.  If you don't want to see the 0,  then you just change the field type to CHAR and handle accordingly.
    Regards,
    Rich Heilman

  • Is it possible to create a editable pdf with validation(required field) using Adobe Acrobat pro version?

    Hi,
    the subject says it all. I have downloaded the trail version to see if its possible to create a editable pdf with validation(required field) using Adobe Acrobat pro version?
    Basically, I will have to create a pdf form where users fill it and send it back to me. there will be required fields (the textbox and check box) that user need to fill before saving the editable pdf?
    Is it possible. if so, can someone kind enough to point to me right directions?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for reply. What I am trying to achieve is to give an option for the user to download the pdf form and once the user tries to save the pdf, it validates with the required field. I managed to create the editable pdf with required fields option. I just need that validation to be done when user click on save file. How can I achieve this? thanks so much for your help.

  • Problem with adding new field to the mass change screen in FBL5N

    Hi,
    We have a problem with adding the field XREF3 to the mass change screen. We followed steps described in the SAP Note 640908, but the result is that when we try to mass change some documents in FBL5N and enter some values in the mass change screen, a message appears: "Please enter at least one new value" and nothing is changed.
    If you have faced with such a problem, we would be grateful if you give us some tips.
    Regards,
    Miłosz Włodarczyk

    The problem has been resolved: we didn't activate a code in SE80.

  • Are there any problems with a "required Extended Protection" / "Always On" / "Livelink Server" combination?

    Hello,
    we have a Livelink  Server database running with two replicas on two nodes as Always On Group, both instances running extended protection in "allowed" mode.
    Our company security policy demands setting the extended protection to "required".
    Are there any known problems with a "required Extended Protection" / "Always On" / "Livelink Server" combination?
    Environment:
    OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise X64 SP1
    DB: SQL Server 2012 (11.0.5556.0)
    Thx & BR
    Achim

    Hi Achim,
    According to my knowledge, there are no known problems with a "required Extended Protection" / "Always On" / "Livelink Server" combination.
    Extended Protection helps to prevent an authentication relay attack by using service binding and channel binding. We need to note that when Extended Protection is set to
    Required, only connections from protected applications on protected operating systems are accepted. This setting is the most secure but connections from operating systems or applications that do not support Extended Protection will not be able
    to connect to SQL Server. For more details, please review the following article.
    Connect to the Database Engine Using Extended Protection
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff487261(v=sql.110).aspx
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Unique problem with validation/ making field required

    I have searched the forums trying to find a way to make a field required based on the users selection of a check box, or something else. So far, everything says use nullTest = "error".
    I have tried to do this and get the following results: The red highlighting, which shows up around my other required fields, will not show up unless you click in the text box and then out of it. Weird! Then, when pressing the submit button, it will not actually give you an error message if there is nothing in that text box, as it will if there is nothing in the fields that I originally make required.
    Any thoughts, or fixes would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    We do the same thing here. We haven't had any issues with the submit not validating the field correctly though. Our only issue was the red highlighting. To get around this, we would call resetdata on the field. resetData clears out the value of the field so you need to store it off and then reset it.
    if (form1.BP1.ChangeActivities.Pos1.Department==1) then $.validate.nullTest = "error" else $.validate.nullTest = "disabled"
    endif
    $=$
    var x = $
    xfa.host.resetData("form1.BP1.ChangeParticulars.Pos1To.DeptNo")
    $ = x

  • Problem with select max(FIELD)

    I have a table with the following fields:
    PARTID     ART_TYP     AEC     SERVICE     PLANT     STATUS
    4711     A     A     2     P     230
    4711     A     B     0     P     230
    4712     A     B     2     P     230
    4713     A     B     0     P     230
    I need a sqlscript where I get the records with MAX(SERVICE)
    In this example
    4711     A     A     2     P     230
    4712     A     B     2     P     230
    4713     A     B     0     P     230
    I tried this with:
    select distinct partid,
         art_typ,
         aec,
         max(service),
         plant,
         status
    from t_msltmp
    group by partid,art_typ,aec,plant,status
    But I get both records of partid=4711
    Can someone help me with this problem
    kind regards
    Menk Slot

    ROW_NUMBER() requires explicit ORDER BY clause in OVER:
    http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96540/functions105a.htm#86312
    SQL> select partid, art_typ, aec, mx, plant, status
      2  from(select partid,
      3                art_typ,
      4                aec,
      5                max(service) over (partition by partid) mx,
      6                row_number() over (partition by partid order by service desc) rn
      7                plant,
      8                status
      9         from t_t)
    10  where rn = 1
    11  /
        PARTID A A         MX P     STATUS
          4711 A A          2 P        230
          4712 A B          2 P        230
          4713 A B          0 P        230Rgds.
    P.S.
    Another way to get this (more tedoius):
    SQL> select partid,
      2  max(art_typ) keep (dense_rank first order by service desc) art_typ,
      3  max(aec) keep (dense_rank first order by service desc) aec,
      4  max(service) service,
      5  max(plant) keep (dense_rank first order by service desc) plant,
      6  max(status) keep (dense_rank first order by service desc) status
      7  from t_t
      8  group by partid
      9  /
        PARTID A A    SERVICE P     STATUS
          4711 A A          2 P        230
          4712 A B          2 P        230
          4713 A B          0 P        230Message was edited by:
    dnikiforov

  • Help with validating required fields

    I have approximately 50 columns in a result set. I need to find out if the required fields (20 out of those 50 columns are required fields) have values (not empty field).
    Since I'm dealing with a large result set (approximately 3000 to 5000 records), what is the most efficient thing to do to validate each field?
    For example:
    Column A, B,C,D.E.F, etc are required fields, I need to validate that each of these column has value otherwise I need to <CFABORT> the process and notify the user.

    The data is not yet in our database,they are created in memory when the app. is run.
    I have sort of  Xml To Query function that generates a result set. I'm doing some validation on req. fields before they are inserted into our DB.
    I try to run your code but I got an error:The value '' cannot be converted to a number
    Here is my code imitating yours (For testing I'm using fewer columns):
    <CFSET MandatoryFields = "Org,OrgId,LastName,FirstName,Gender,Address,City,State,Zip,Phone"> 
    <cfquery name="q1" dbtype="query"> 
    <cfloop list="#MandatoryFields#" index="ThisField"> 
    select Org, '#ThisField# null' problem 
    from ResutSet 
    where #ThisField# is null 
    union 
    </cfloop>
    select Campus, '' problem 
    from ResutSet 
    where 1 = 2 
    </cfquery>
    <cfabort>

  • Is anyone else having problems with Apertures Date fields?

    After experiencing a sysems failure I began restoring my images from backups.  I have had no end of problems with Image dates.  I have come to the determination that Aperture is NOT using either the "Create Date" or "DateTimeOriginal" as the image "Date" or "Date Created" data if other fields have other dates.
    Here is a clip from my image metadata using exiftool:
    File Modification Date/Time     : 2012:09:23 19:53:15-04:00
    File Access Date/Time           : 2013:01:16 11:34:38-05:00
    File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2013:01:16 11:31:32-05:00
    Create Date                          : 2006:02:20 11:51:12.10
    Date/Time Original              : 2006:02:20 16:51:12.10
    Modify Date                          : 2006:02:20 11:51:12.10
    And here is what Aperture utilized on import
    Date:                               9/23/12 7:53:15 PM EDT
    Date Created                         9/23/2012 7:53:15 PM
    So Aperture utlized the File Modification Date/Time as the Create Date despite that the fact that the Create Date field is present and is properly formatted in the original image.
    According to the Aperture mapping table, this shouldn't be happening.
    Now, before someone recommends that I use Aperture's Date Adjust utility - I'm talking about  slightly over 30,000 images.  Editing images one at a time, or in blocks when you don't know what field Aperture is using as the Create Date would require individual inspection of each image followed by manual adjustment of each image.  That approach isn't acceptable.

    Hmm ok, let me restate the issue then, I thought I was clear.  I could have pointed out in my original post however, that only the EXIF and IPTC date fields were displayed from the metadata dump.
    The data set presented in my first post is the EXIF dataset from the file which clearly shows the image was captured by digital camera at
    Create Date                          : 2006:02:20 11:51:12.10
    Date/Time Original              : 2006:02:20 16:51:12.10
    (The delta of 5 hours is the result of Zulu versus local time offset)
    But, when I ingested it into Aperture, the import routine utilized the IPTC field
    File Modification Date/Time     : 2012:09:23 19:53:15-04:00
    which is updated by the OS whenever you move the file around outside of Aperture. (a number of image data fields are updated by the OS - filename for example is another.).  This resulted in the image date fields being stamped in Aperture as:
    Date:                               9/23/12 7:53:15 PM EDT
    Date Created                         9/23/2012 7:53:15 PM
    Which obviously came form the File Modification Date/Time field and not (either) the Create Date or Date/Time Original fields.

  • Problem with gross requirement planning pir is not getting reduced

    Dear Gurus
    I am trying to use strategy 11 for a particular finished product.(having bom and routing)
    In the material master I have set mrp type pd lot size ex .strategy group 11, mixed mrp 2,item category group norm, availabilty checking group 02 .
    Then I made manually pir for that material in md61 with  BSF requirement type .
    Then ran the mrp for that material in md02.
    Planned orders came .(In md04 screen that gross requirement line text also came as usual )Converted them to prodn order and then did the gr in mb31 with 101 mvt type. After doing the gr the pir should get reduced in md04 screen which is not happening . Where I am going wrong
    Regards
    Sandip Sarkar

    Dear Sandip Sarkar,
                                      It usually happens run MRP and ckeck.
    Strategy 11 in summary :-
    1. Sales Order creation - no impact.
    2. Goods Receipt - minus the quantity for the oldest planned independent in demand management.
       For e.g. if PIR is 100 and delivery 90, PIR becomes 10 (withdrawal 90).
    3. Delivery - no impact as delivery is issue from sales order.
    This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
    You need to maintain the following master data for the finished product:
    Maintain strategy group 11 on the MRP screen.
    Set the Mixed MRP indicator to 2 on the MRP screen.
    Maintain the item category group (for example, NORM) on the Sales Organization screen.
    Maintain the Availability check field so that you perform an availability check without the replenishment lead time (checking group 02 in the standard system).
    Strategy                                                        10                                           
    Stock is taken into account                           Yes                                          
    reduction of planned independent
    requirements takes place during u2026   u2026 goods issue for                                                                                delivery                                  order (discrete production),                                                                               
    11
    Stock is taken into account                          No
    Reduction of planned independent
    requirements takes place during u2026            ... goods receipt for a production
                                                                            order (discrete production),                                                                               
    for a planned order (repetitive
                                                                             manufacturing), or for a purchase
                                                                             order (trading goods).
    Edited by: Vachanala Rajasekhar on May 7, 2010 11:55 AM

  • Contract - problem with attachements (empty field in LOIO_OBJID)

    Hi Guys,
    We are using extended classic scenario of SRM 4.0 (SRM Server 500) and our latest support package is SAPKIBKS12. We have the following problem with contracts.
    Sometimes when an attachment is added to a contract the system does not fill the following fields in tabel BBP_PDATT.
    LOIO_CLASS: Normally filled with BBP_L_DOC
    LOIO_OBJID: Normaly filled with a GUID size datastring
    Whenever this happens and later on the contract is changed and released the system will raise an abort. We tried the following notes but no good result.
    891293,919467,932602,964065. Some other notes that might be possible are 1042826/1085700/1083063 but we also don't have good experience with these ones.
    Can anyone give us advice about two things.
    1) Is there a way to fill the empty fields in BBP_PDATT so that existing contract will work properly again?
    2) Does anyone know why this problem occurs and how to fix it for new contracts?
    Hope to hear from you,
    Arie

    Thankyou for the reply. I have made following changes but still not working. I am creating the inquiry and customer material is not getting populated. Please guide in resolving the issue.
    DATA : W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX LIKE BAPISDITMX OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX-ITM_NUMBER  = THEAD-ITEMNO.
          W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX-UPDATEFLAG  = 'X'.
          W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX-CUST_MAT22 = 'X'.
    APPEND W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_INQUIRY_CREATEFROMDATA2'
       EXPORTING
       SALESDOCUMENTIN               =
         INQUIRY_HEADER_IN             =  W_ENQUIRY_THEAD
      IMPORTING
        SALESDOCUMENT                 = W_NUMBER
       TABLES
        RETURN                        = W_RETURN
        INQUIRY_ITEMS_IN              =  W_ENQUIRY_ITEM
        INQUIRY_ITEMS_INX             =  W_ENQUIRY_ITEM_INX
         INQUIRY_PARTNERS              = T_INQUIRY_PARTNERS

  • Problem with Auo Increment field in Database table

    HI...
    I have a table with Auto increment field.
    I am using Sql Server 2000.
    I have a Table Component on front end which is binded with that (auto increment) table.
    When I call commitChanges() I receive following exception :
    Exception Details:  java.lang.RuntimeException
      Number of conflicts while synchronizing: 1 SyncResolver.INSERT_ROW_CONFLICT row 2 [sunm][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]Cannot insert explicit value for identity column in table 'Authorization_Book' when IDENTITY_INSERT is set to OFF.Anybody knows the solution...

    The following excerpts are from http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jfbrown?entry=using_creator_to_insert_into. Do they help?
    What about IDENTITY or AUTOINCREMENT or other database-generated columns?
    This is highly database dependent. Some databases require you to obtain the key through vendor-specific means. Others say "set the value to null". Some say to not include the column in the INSERT statement.
    So how do I exclude my IDENTITY or other column from the INSERT statement?
    Use the RowSet's advanced insertableColumns property. Create a boolean[] array with one value for each column in the result. Use true to include the column in the INSERT statement, otherwise use false. The RowSet's property sheet doesn't allow you to set this property (in Creator2-EA2), so set the property in your java code.

  • Problem with non currency field calculations to become curr

    Hi guys,
    Is there a problem if I have a QUAN field and DEC field forming to become a CURR field? I mean a have this computation below:
    v_var1 = v_var2 * v_var3.
    where v_var1 type QUAN, v_var2 type DEC and v_var3 type CURR...
    would it incur any problem with the calculations?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Did you try ?
    Worked for me flawlessly
    tables bseg.
    parameters : qty like bseg-menge,
                       amt like bseg-dmbtr.
    data : result like bseg-dmbtr.
    result = qty * amt.
                write result.
    The only issue is that the result will be rounded upto 2 decimals.
    But if you declare result as
    data : result(13) type p decimals 3.
    Then there will be no issues.
    regards,
    Advait
    Edited by: Advait Gode on Oct 3, 2008 3:59 PM

  • Problems with the 'Comments' field in iTunes

    First, sorry for my english (I'm danish).
    I've read a lot of threads here and everywhere else, but can't find a solution for my exact problem. I use Windows Vista and the newest version of iTunes.
    Most of my mp3 songs (35.000) are put directly in album folders to the folder 'D:My Music from another computer via a USB drive and the songs already have id3 tag information on them.
    I then add the albums to iTunes and most of my tag information is now updated in iTunes. Names, Artists, Genre, Year, everything is okay. By the way the songs have ID3v2.3 tag information. I see that in my Mp3tag v.2.42 application.
    But the problem is with the 'Comments' field:
    Those tags (originally put to the songs directly in the proberties of the song in Windows Explorer) will simply not transfer to iTunes 'Comments' field. And if I write something in the iTunes 'Comments' field this will not show up in the fields properties in windows Explorer. It looks like the 'Comments' fields in iTunes and in the proberties in the song are not connected at all!?
    I then found out, I could let iTunes convert the ID3 codes, but nothing happens except from when using v. 1.0 or 1.1, because then the comments tag are transferres, but unfortunately all the tags will only show 30 characters!!!
    And there's also a different story:
    A few albums though are put directly on my computer by using iTunes to import the CD. These songs have ID3 v.2.2 tags, so I guess iTunes import files in that format?
    And here it's a little different story. If I put comment data directly to the file proberties in Windows Explorer (after the CD's been imported to iTunes), the comments will show up in iTunes, but only as several 0 and 1 digits! On the other hand, if I put information directly in iTunes 'Comments' field it wil show up correctly in the file proberties! But it's only a few songs/albums that are handled that way.
    Well, bottom's line, I want to see my comments tags (which are allready there in the song's proberties) when I browse my music in my folders in Windows Explorer and I want to see the exact same comments if I go to browse my music in iTunes. That should not be a problem ... but it is not ...
    Can I please get a solution or at least an explanation, and hopefully in not too tecnical terms.

    I, too, hope someone will answer this! I am hoping to catalog my entire CD collection in iTunes and I want to include the storage box number somehow, thinking that "comments" would be a good place to do so. If I cannot do that I'll try to find a program other than iTumes to do it. Does anyone have any suggestions on this topic? ...perhaps I need to open a new thread?
    THANKS!
    Doug

Maybe you are looking for