Java Exception handling framework

Please suggest some frameworks for Java Exception handling

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/exceptions/
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=31&thread=173005
http://www.tfh-berlin.de/~knabe/java/multex/
http://www.impetus.com/comp_jeh.htm
http://www.softwaresummit.com/1998/1998/speakers/haggar.htm

Similar Messages

  • Exception handling framework?

    Can anyone recommend an exception handling framework or perhaps pattern for Applets?
    Thanks, Tom.

    Methinks you're gonna be stuck. Unless every catch block already happens to call some central method (or small set of methods) and passes in the exception, there is no way I can think of to "flip a switch" and magically have all your catch blocks start logging messages when they weren't before. You'll probably have to change the code every place you want to log something. This is why it's a great idea to think of those sorts of things before coding a huge application. :-) I'm not criticizing you since it sounds like you inherited this.

  • Exception handling in ODI - common exception handling framework

    Hi,
    I need to come up with a common exception handling framework in an environment where ESB and ODI are being used for interfacing and ELT operations. I am of the opinion that
    1. I am not able to find any documentation wrt exception handling when ODI is used? Can some one help me with some pointers?
    2, When I come up with a common exception handling framework using BPEL, will I be able to invoke the same from ODI.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

    Thanks for the reply Allan. I haven't used BusinessWorks.
    I did go through this thread before and here's my understanding.
    1. ESB provides the ability of error handling (client management API) but not the exception handling i.e. I can't redirect the flow in case there is an exception in my primary flow. Am I right with my understanding?
    2. Error handling ability of ESB is limited to retryable exceptions viz-a-viz asynchrounous ESB processes (e.g. database listener not up) where in the process can be retried. Am I right here?
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

  • Exception handling - Common exception handling framework

    Hi,
    I need to come up with a common exception handling framework in an environment where ESB and ODI are being used for interfacing and ELT operations. I am of the opinion that
    1. A generic exception handling framework can be built using BPEL and can be invoked from ESB. Is my understanding correct?
    2. Are there any ways that we can build this framework using ESB itself? I opinion that it's not possible as there is no concept of try-catch?
    3. I am not able to find any documentation wrt exception handling when ODI is used? Can some one help me with some pointers?
    4, When I come up with a common exception handling framework, will I be able to invoke the same from ODI.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

    Thanks for the reply Allan. I haven't used BusinessWorks.
    I did go through this thread before and here's my understanding.
    1. ESB provides the ability of error handling (client management API) but not the exception handling i.e. I can't redirect the flow in case there is an exception in my primary flow. Am I right with my understanding?
    2. Error handling ability of ESB is limited to retryable exceptions viz-a-viz asynchrounous ESB processes (e.g. database listener not up) where in the process can be retried. Am I right here?
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

  • Java Exception Handling

    Hello everyone,
    I'm searching for a design pattern / framework to manage exception handling. I'm currently working on a distributed document management system for PC / AS/400, which consists of Commandline clients, a Socket Server and a windows NT daemon in java, which accepts network requests from the Socket Server. Communication is done via serialized Objects.
    My Problem is, that exceptions can be thrown either on the server or on the client side and have to be transferred to the user. Error Messages should be read from the database. Exception handling should prefferably take place in a central piece of code, such as the two endpoints of network connections, the SocketServer as service under win32 and another SocketServer as Application on another box, currently with UNIX OS.
    thanks in advance for any answers
    regards

    You should look into Bridge [GOF:151] and Memento [GOF:273].
    Bridge allows you to decouple your mechanism from the implementation memento on how to propergate the decoupled exception information.

  • Java Exception handling incorrect ?

    Check this program out:
    I tried it on 3 different machines but the result is the same
    class TestEx extends Exception
    class Excp
    void test() throws Exception
    throw new TestEx();
    public static void main(String args[])
         Excp e = new Excp();
         try
         e.test();
         catch(Throwable ee)
              System.out.println("Exception caught");
    Compile it and then delete TestEx.class. What should happen ? In all of the 3 machines the NoClassDeffoundError (thrown on TestEx.class) was not caught at the 'catch (Throwable ee)' although to me it seems it should be.
    Martin.

    I am clear about the loading and linking phases.
    So this statement "...It is pretty clear that when a class is first loaded and linked, all classes that it refers to are loaded (but not necessarily linked)..."
    it not necessarily true.
    When a class is loaded, all superclasses/interfaces are loaded. The time of linking is not really specified. It could be early linking or late linking, specifically the resolving part of the linking phase, since that is the issue here (not the verification or preparation). A VM should always make sure it looks like late resolving since a statement that could create error might never be executed.
    In most cases, the VM does not try and should not to load all classes in constant pool when it does the linking phase. It should do so when that class is resolved (on the many bytecodes that do so).
    So the case above. Yes, when Excp is loaded and linked it could preload TestEx, but this is not really relevant here. Next, when the 'new' bytecode is executed in test() on TestEx, it knows the TestEx is missing and at this point it must create NoClassDefFoundError instance and throw it. Up to here the behavior is clear.
    What happens after the new is executed and now we know we have NoClassDefFoundError, what happens now is the question. The user might still want to handle this exception. Of course it is quite rare, but should be possible.
    thx,
    Martin.

  • Good exception handling policy for Java web application

    I'm looking for a good exception handling policy for Java web application. First I found this Java exception handling best practices - How To Do In Java which says that you should never catch the Trowable class nor use e.printStackTrace();
    Then I found this Oracle page The Message-Driven Bean Class - The Java EE 6 Tutorial, which does just that. So now I'm confused. Is there a good page online for an exception handling policy for Java EE Web applications? I have a hard time finding one. I've read that you should not catch the Exception class. I've been catching it previously to make sure that some unknown exception doesn't slip through early in the loop and stops all other customers from executing later on in the loop. We have a loop which runs once a minute implemented using the Quartz framework. Is it OK if you just change the implementation to catch the RuntimeException class instead of the Exception class? We're using Java 7 and the Jetty Servlet Container.

    I'm looking for a good exception handling policy for Java web application.
    If you have not done so I suggest you start by reviewing the several trails in The Java Tutorials.
    Those trails cover both HOW to use exceptions and WHEN to use them.
    This trail discusses  the 'controversy' you mention regarding 'Unchecked Exceptions'
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/runtime.html
    Unchecked Exceptions — The Controversy
    Because the Java programming language does not require methods to catch or to specify unchecked exceptions (RuntimeException, Error, and their subclasses), programmers may be tempted to write code that throws only unchecked exceptions or to make all their exception subclasses inherit from RuntimeException. Both of these shortcuts allow programmers to write code without bothering with compiler errors and without bothering to specify or to catch any exceptions. Although this may seem convenient to the programmer, it sidesteps the intent of the catch or specify requirement and can cause problems for others using your classes.
    Why did the designers decide to force a method to specify all uncaught checked exceptions that can be thrown within its scope? Any Exception that can be thrown by a method is part of the method's public programming interface. Those who call a method must know about the exceptions that a method can throw so that they can decide what to do about them. These exceptions are as much a part of that method's programming interface as its parameters and return value.
    The next question might be: "If it's so good to document a method's API, including the exceptions it can throw, why not specify runtime exceptions too?" Runtime exceptions represent problems that are the result of a programming problem, and as such, the API client code cannot reasonably be expected to recover from them or to handle them in any way. Such problems include arithmetic exceptions, such as dividing by zero; pointer exceptions, such as trying to access an object through a null reference; and indexing exceptions, such as attempting to access an array element through an index that is too large or too small.
    Generally don't catch an exception unless you plan to HANDLE the exception. Logging, by itself is NOT handliing.
    First I found this Java exception handling best practices - How To Do In Java which says that you should never catch the Trowable class nor use e.printStackTrace(); 
    That article, like many, has some good advice and some poor or even bad advice. You get what you pay for!
    I've read that you should not catch the Exception class.
    Ok - but all that does is indicate that a problem of some sort happened somewhere. Not very useful info. Java goes to a lot of trouble to provide specific exceptions for specific problems.
    I've been catching it previously to make sure that some unknown exception doesn't slip through early in the loop and stops all other customers from executing later on in the loop.
    If the exception is 'unknown' then maybe it NEEDS to 'stop all other customers from executing later on in the loop'.
    That is EXACTLY why you don't want to do that. You need to identify which exceptions should NOT stop processing and which ones should.
    Some 'unknown' exceptions can NOT be recovered and indicate a serious problem, perhaps with the JVM itself. You can NOT just blindly keep executing and ignore them without risking data corruption and/or the integrity of the entire system Java is running on.
    Is it OK if you just change the implementation to catch the RuntimeException class instead of the Exception class? We're using Java 7 and the Jetty Servlet Container.
    No - not if you want a well-behaved system.
    Don't catch exceptions unless you HANDLE/resolve them. There are times when it makes sense to log the exception (which does NOT handle it) and then raise it again so that it gets handled properly later. Yes - I know that is contrary to the advice given in that article but, IMHO, that article is wrong about that point.
    If you have ever had to maintain/fix/support someone else's Java code you should already understand how difficult it can be to find WHERE a problem occurs and WHAT the exact problem is when exceptions are not handled properly.

  • JAVA BEANSHELL EXCEPTION HANDLING

    Hi
    still new to ODI
    I have created a java beanshell script in ODI which calls a simple java class, cars, then sets the no of seats to a value designed to raise an exception. Exception raised but procedure works OK,
    How can I register the fact that it has failed through exception handling? (It is possible that my java exception handling isn't quite right)
    The no of seats has no effect on the success/failure of the ODI procedure, but the log shows that the exception is caught !
    any assistance gratefully received.
    Regards
    Terry
    cars class: (added to agent start)
    ====================
    public class cars {
    private int seats;
    public void setSeats (int seats) throws tooManySeatsException {
    if (seats) < 100) {
    this .seats = seats;
    } else {
    throw new tooManySeatsException("Too many seats");
    public int getSeats () {
    return this.seats;
    class tooManySeatsException extends Exception {
    public tooManySeatsException (String msg){
    super();
    Java beanshell procedure in ODI
    ====================
    import cars;
    public class carsTest {
    public carsTest(){
    public void init(){
    cars c = new cars();
    c.setSeats(20);
    //c.setseats(200);
    try {
    carsTest ct = new carsTest();
    ct.init();
    } catch (Exception e) {
    throw Error (e);
    }

    Your code throws exception when you set value >100 but you are setting 20 thus it would not throw exception.
    In the procedure step you can uncheck "Ignore error" flag to let execution failed on throwing any exception from your code. If you check that flag then the execution would not fail rather lease the task in warning state.

  • Advantage of Java Exceptions over C error handling.

    I understand the advantages of Java Exception handling(as against C) when it comes to the ability to define exclusive Exception types or reuse exceptions, documentation benefits of the throws clause, advantages due to OO etc. But some people say that using exceptions in Java it is possible to recover from an exceptional condition and that's an advantage over how errors are dealt in C.
    Is that really an advantage? (I mean is that true?)AFAIK in C errors can be handled using perror or errno.h. For every error code generated there seems to be a description. And by checking the return values from functions we could see if there had been an exceptional condition and if there really had been one take appropriate action and recover from the error. So how is it that Java can recover from exceptions while in C it is not possible to recover from errors?
    Thank you very much.

    I'm waiting in my cold cell when the bell begins to chime
    Reflecting on my past life and it doesn't have much time
    Cos at 5 o'clock they take me to the Gallows Pole
    The sands of time for me are running low
    When the priest comes to read me the last rites
    I take a look through the bars at the last sights
    Of a world that has gone very wrong for me
    Can it be there's some sort of error
    Hard to stop the surmounting terror
    Is it really the end not some crazy dream
    Somebody please tell me that I'm dreaming
    It's not so easy to stop from screaming
    But words escape me when I try to speak
    Tears they flow but why am I crying
    After all I am not afraid of dying
    Don't believe that there is never an end
    As the guards march me out to the courtyard
    Someone calls from a cell "God be with you"
    If there's a God then why has he let me die?
    As I walk all my life drifts before me
    And though the end is near I'm not sorry
    Catch my soul cos it's willing to fly away
    Mark my words please believe my soul lives on
    Please don't worry now that I have gone
    I've gone beyond to see the truth
    When you know that your time is close at hand
    maybe then you'll begin to understand
    Life down there is just a strange illusion.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah, Hallowed be thy name
    Yeah, yeah, yeah, Hallowed be thy name

  • Java Exception framework

    Please help me out to design better exception handling framework.

    I normally implement something like the following:
    interface IException {
       public boolean hasCause();
       public Throwable getCause();
       public void printStackTrace();
    abstract public class AbstractException extends Exception
    implements IException {
       final private Throwable cause;
       protected AbstractException(final String message) {
          this(message, null);
       protected AbstractException(final String message, final Throwable cause) {
           super(message);
           this.cause = cause;
        final public boolean hasCause() {
             return (cause != null);
        final public Throwable getCause() {
             return cause;
        final public void printStackTrace() {
              super.printStackTrace();
              if (hasCause())
                   cause.printStackTrace();
    }In additon to AbstractException, I also create AbstractError (extending Error) and AbstractWarning (extending Exception). When I receive an AbstractError, this indicates a non-recoverable situation. Failure to connect to database, inability to read XML config file, etc. When I receive an AbstractWarning, the servlet or front controller prompts the user to recover from a given situation. Invalid user input, missing field, etc. AbstractException encapsulates business rule violations.
    By creating three separate 'flavors' of exceptions, you can substantially reduce the number of exception processing areas in your application. Normally, I allow AbstractError and AbstractWarning to propogate all the way to the servlet controller and then display a message to the user in a common way. AbstractException, for business exceptions, are sometimes handled in the domain model and other times I allow them to propogate up to the servlet controller.
    - Saish

  • Exception handling - general concepts

    ok, well i skipped the chapter on exception handling :=)
    Correct me if im wrong, but lets say im writing some code and im not sure how to handle some of the exceptions that might get thrown or what exceptions will get thrown for that matter. How does one go about handling every possible exception that is "required".
    I guess what im trying to ask is that if a certain block of code is calling methods that throw specific exceptions, then you will need to handle those exceptions. So that means you need to be aware of, or know to go lookup the possible exceptions that those methods can throw.
    Im skipping around in Beginning Java 2, from wronx press jdk 1.4 edition

    This is quite a hard one to be specific on as I think most of us learned this with a bit of trial and error.
    1. IO always requires the method to be thrown ie
    public void writeContents() throws IOException {
    // methods
    2. The compiler will tell you when you need a try /catch block
    3. I often code this with;-
    try {
    // my methods here;
    catch (Exception ignore) {}
    and have empty braces with a general catch all Exception on the first run
    4. Then if there are problems such as the code won't work I fill in the blanks ie;-
    catch (Exception e) {System.out.println(e);}
    // or e.getMessage() );
    // or printStackTrace();
    depending on what the first message is
    5. Correct the exception now that you know what it is. Really this is a form of 'divide and conquer' as you eliminate the problems as they occur through javas exception handling abilities.
    6. With a bit more practice you will implement things like finally and know when to put the handler back to 'catch (Exception ignore) {}' and when to leave it in.
    7. Exception handling can also be used to instruct the client in useful ways too eg;-
    try {
    myTextfield.setText("Enter Your Age");
    myInt = parse ...(myTextfield.getText(etc ...
    catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
    myTextfield.setText("Enter Number Values Only");
    // or something like
    catch (NullPointerException nfe) {
    myTextfield.setText("Oops you forgot to enter a value");
    This has been my experience anyway + I trust I have assisted

  • Provider Hosted App - Exception Handling and Logging

    Hello,
    I would like to use file system to log the exceptions (The IIS server in which the APP is configured) for Provider Hosted App - Could anyone share some blogs/links related to that?
    Thanks in advance,

    Well the first time, I asked the question, I think I
    was not so clear. Please let me explain this in
    detail. I am not architect, so correct me if I am
    wrong.
    I want to use log4J but definitely want to avoid using
    them directly in our package, idea is to create
    wrappers around all the external API, jar we are
    using. At logging side I feel little comfortable.
    But having little difficulty in thinking and designing
    about Exception handling framework.
    1. My aim is to create a general framework in 3 broad
    categories (For Presentation tier, For Business tier,
    for Data Access tier)
    2. For each tier if you import those already created
    framework classes, all developers should be just able
    to use the methods of exception framework and use them
    in catch block and throw them.
    Example:- I would like to create a class called
    MyProjectExceptionDecider, which will decide the type
    of exception in Business Tier and then use my
    MyProjectExceptionErrorParser, which reads the XML
    document and gets a related message number and error
    message.
    This MyProjectExceptionErrorParser then passes the
    right exception to MyProjectExceptionDisplayer which
    will display the exception with right message and
    message number.
    And something more like this. I am not yet getting
    complete picture.
    3. So, if you have done something similar and if you
    have the class diagram and sequence diagram for such
    exception handling, I would be grateful if you are
    willing to share with me.
    Please let me know, if you have different ideas. I
    request you all to participate and throw your ideas
    and suggestions.
    Srikanthgenerally, wheather or not you are using log4j or anything else, when designing exception handling mechnism, you need to decide on where or by whom an exception will be handled, and if the exception needs to be displyed, and how it is displayed.

  • What King of exception handling is done in OA framework code?

    Hi All,
    I am not a core java person but have to do some OA framework code changes.Wanted to know what kind of exception handling is done in OAF codes?
    I was looking as the seeded oracle controllers and dont see any try catch blocks.
    can anyone guide me?

    OAF java based framework, hence exception handling is similar to how its done in core java. I would advuce to better go through exception handling concepts of core java.
    --Mukul                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • Integration Process exception handling & alerts, Java

    Hello,
    I would like to enhance my basic scenarios fool proof and with as much Java as possible.
    I have set up several asynchronous and synchronous File to SOAP transfers between systems A and B
    using PI70 including my own Java mapping classes and PI's AF_Modules beans. They work just fine.
    I have not designed my own Integration Processes yet, so execution is based on channel settings and availability timing.
    I have learned this aproach may be exposed to general faults resulting manual monitoring and repairing.
    For example server problems at receiver side can result data losses as sender channel just keeps removing source
    files like normally, as the process would be better to just stop right there and alert or something.
    My question is, is the "Enterprise services Builders" Integration Process & Graphical definition screen the one and only tool to 
    customize whole process exception handling and alerts in PI, and Java is not an option?
    Appreciate your advice on this.
    Kind regards m

    Hi m,
    Strange Name
    >>I have learned this aproach may be exposed to general faults resulting manual monitoring and repairing. For example server problems at receiver side can result data losses as sender channel just keeps removing source  files like normally, as the process would be better to just stop right there and alert or something.
    If you are looking to handle this particular scenario, then we have the alert mechanism and CCMS monitoring. There you will come to know whether the end system down or not.
    Also in addition to this you can write your own java (in message mapping, as modules, java mapping) /abap code (as abap mapping, user exit in standard functions etc) for providing more details in error scenarios. But you need to validate whether the maintenance/development cost for the code is justified in your scenarios
    Regards
    Suraj

  • Exception Handling in Java .. Help

    Hi folks I needed some help in exception handling ...
    I know that I could go like this
    public class MyClass
         public static void main(String args[])
              try
              System.out.println(1/0);
              catch(java.lang.Exception e)
                   e.printStackTrace();
    Now what if i want to throw an error for example in C++ we would go like
    try
    throw 1;
    throw 0;
    throw 'A';
    catch (int i) //If exception is of integer type ... you may overload it
    cout << "Integer value thrown and caught \n";
    catch (...) //Unexpected error
    cout << "Some other unexpected exception \n";
    How could i impliment a code such as the above in Java using throw...
    Thanks again folks...

    1. When you post code, use code tags to make it readable. Copy/paste from your original source in your editor (NOT from your earlier post here), highlight the code, and click the CODE button. Use the Preview tab to see how your post will work.
    2. [http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/]

Maybe you are looking for