JCOM and BEA support and license issues

After going round and round with first tier support, I'd like to post this message
to the newsgroup to clarify how jCOM finds the license.bea file.
Here is an e-mail I sent to support...
The beahomelist file gets created in a bea directory in the user's home directory
($HOME/bea/beahomelist).
The problem is that the WebLogic server and the Jcom classes are looking for the
license in two different ways.
WLS uses the $BEA_HOME variable and jCOM uses the user.home System property (this
may or may not be $HOME).
Your were incorrect when you stated that the WebLogic server needs to runnning by
the user that installed the software. Any user can start the server and use the
jCom classes as long as jCom can find the license, this requires that the user wanting
to use jCOM have a bea directory and beahomelist file in the directory that the user.home
system property resolves to.
It would be much easier for jCOM users to have the server and jcom find the license
in the same manner.
You've been so helpful.

"Michael Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
After going round and round with first tier support, I'd like to post this
message
to the newsgroup to clarify how jCOM finds the license.bea file.
Here is an e-mail I sent to support...
The beahomelist file gets created in a bea directory in the user's home
directory
($HOME/bea/beahomelist).
The problem is that the WebLogic server and the Jcom classes are looking
for the
license in two different ways.
WLS uses the $BEA_HOME variable and jCOM uses the user.home System property
(this
may or may not be $HOME).
Your were incorrect when you stated that the WebLogic server needs to runnning
by
the user that installed the software. Any user can start the server and
use the
jCom classes as long as jCom can find the license, this requires that the
user wanting
to use jCOM have a bea directory and beahomelist file in the directory that
the user.home
system property resolves to.
It would be much easier for jCOM users to have the server and jcom find
the license
in the same manner.
You've been so helpful.
Hi Michael,
thanks a lot!! this was the right hint!!
Michael

Similar Messages

  • Rhel Versions and Licensing Issue

    Post Author: Hexagram16
    CA Forum: Deployment
    Hi Guys,
    As raised previously, this is to seek for assistance on how do we go about our local client licensing. We were about to simulate when we found out that subject is using Linux instead of  Windows. This resulted us to requesting a new Media Kit from you which can be used for Linux. However, our client uses RHEL 5 yet the one we have is only RHEL 4. Since still incompatible, we decided to downgrade server from RHEL 5 to 4. Is BOBJ_Linux only supported RHEL4? no patchwork etc? another issue is upon some test simulation, BO license won't run as cross-platform (Windows to Linux).
    For your opinions/recommendations
    Thanks

    Apparently the licensing from Microsoft has changed and I need to report using SCCM 2007 on
    228-04437 SQL Server Standard License(s)
    395-02412 Exchange Server Enterprise License(s)
    5HU-00215 Lync Server License(s)
    7JQ-00341 SQL Server Enterprise - 2 Core License(s)
    7NQ-00302 SQL Server Standard - 2 Core License(s)
    D2M-00366 SQL Server Business Intelligence License(s)
    H04-00232 SharePoint Server License(s)
    P71-07280 Windows Server Datacenter - 2 Processor License License(s)
    P73-05897 Windows Server Standard - 2 Processor License(s)
    T6L-00237 System Center Datacenter - 2 Processor License(s)
    T9L-00222 System Center Standard - 2 Processor License(s) of MCCA Server Products
    I saw the SQL per processor built-in report but not the Operating System One...
    I do not see a SCCM report SQL per Core?
    Thanks,
    Dom
    System Center Operations Manager 2007 / System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R2 / Forefront Client Security / Forefront Identity Manager

  • Cisco PI 1.3 upgrade to PI 2.1 and licensing issues

    Hi,
    Currently we have installed Cisco PI 1.3 as virtual appliance with evaluation license which is expired. We are planning to upgrade to PI 2.1 but instead of upgrade we are planning to remove old virtual appliance and install new PI 2.1 virtual appliance as there were no licenses installed on old one and its evaluation license expired. But earlier we have purchased this licenses:
    R-PI12-K9
    Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2
    R-PI12-BASE-K9
    Prime Infrastructure 1.2 Base License and Software
    L-PI12-LF-500
    Prime Infrastructure 1.2 - Lifecycle - 500 Device Lic
    L-PI12-CM-500
    Prime Infrastructure 1.2 - Compliance - 500 Device Lic
    L-LMS42-CM-500
    Prime LMS 4.2 - Compliance - 500 Device Lic PAK
    L-PI12-CM-500-LIC
    Prime Infrastructure 1.2 - Compliance - 500 Device Lic PAK
    L-PI12-LF-500-LIC
    Prime Infrastructure 1.2 - Lifecycle - 500 Device Lic PAK
    L-PILMS42-500
    Prime Infrastructure LMS 4.2 - 500 Device Base Lic
    Can I install new PI 2.1 and use that licenses on that PI 2.1 assuming that this licenses were purchased earlier and not used at all.

    AFAIK ,  yes  you can use them without any issue.
    You may need to contact the License team  with UID or VUID details to  re-issue the License for the new HOST or server.
    Thanks-
    Afroz
    **Ratings Encourages Contributors ***

  • Where is the Forum for Multipoint Server and Licensing Issues?

    I have installed MSDN release of Multipoint 2012 Standard in a VM for testing, and tried to use one of the assigned license codes from my MSDN subscription, and they are rejected by Multipoint server "Error, unable to validate the following codes..."
    Please point me in the right direction.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I'd probably ask over in the MSDN Subscriptions forum:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=msdnfeedback&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
    EDIT: See below for a quicker contact option. That's a nice perk..
    Don't retire TechNet! -
    (Don't give up yet - 13,085+ strong and growing)

  • Blue screen and Licensing Issues

    Just recently I have been unable to open any PDF files. At first an error message popped up stating the license had expired and I needed to remove and reinstll the programs. I haven't tried to remove them yet, since I don't know if I'll be charged again for Adobe Acrobat 9 Standard.
    I tried the Adope Licensing Repair Tool and it went through all the motions, but now when I open a PDF file it either won't show on the screen or I get a "Blue Screen with words that are gone before I can read it, then the computer shuts down completely and restarts.
    Any suggestions?

    Provide exact system info and crash logs:
    Working with your Operating System’s Tools
    Run the Acrobat Cleaner Tool, try again.
    Mylenium

  • Adobe acrobat 9 pro installation/licensing issues

    I installed my licensed copy of Acrobat 9 on a new Windows  7 system.  Acrobat launched but would not open files and shuts down on attempt. Message is "Licensing for this product has stopped working" with subtext "You cannot use the product at this time. You must repair the problem by uninstalling and then reinstalling this product or contacting your IT administrator or Adobe customer support for help."
    I doubt any of you have a solution, so I simply remark on what transpired as a warning and complaint:
    1.  I went to Adobe databse and found that a patch was provided to correct installations/licensing problems on windows 7.  I downloaded it and installed per instructions.  It did not resolve the problem.
    2.  I uninstalled/reinstalled several times. no resolution.
    3.  I called customer support and was outsourced to someone who knew little and first sent me to a kb article having to do with 'expired licensing' even though I clearly informed them that the message and the fact had nothing to do with expired licenses.  They finally referred me to kb405970 on "Licensing has stopped working".  I tried all of the applicable solutions (methods 1-6) and none of them worked.  Now I will have to wait until tomorrow (though I had pressing work to do today) to contact support again.  I fear I will get another outsourced tech who knows little and wastes more of my time.  Such is Adobe's way of supporting paid and licensed product users.
    I understand and sympathize with Adobe's wishes to protect its products from piracy.  However, I expect and paid for a product which works on major and supported operating systems like windows 7. I also understand that if MS or Mac put out a new OS or version, it may require certain adjustments or updates on Adobe's part.  What I do not understand (or have patience with) is that 1) Adobe failed to provide a patch that works; 2) that it then sends me to an outsourced customer service tech who didn't have the knowledge to correct the problem and gave me the wrong information to begin with*. What I finally got was the kb article with a series of multi-step instructions for several methods, none of which worked.  This is an unprofessional and unethical response to those of us who have paid for our product and expect it to work under reasonable conditions in a supported environment.  This is not an acceptable good-faith effort to resolve issues for which Adobe should take full responsibility.
    If any of you do happen to have a real solution (or had a similar problem) do let me know....
    *The first thing the outsourced tech wished to do was get onto my machine via a remote connection, before anything was tried other than giving them the error message and have them provide me with the wrong information. It became clear that this person had less knowledge than I do (which isn't saying much) and there was no way I was going to permit a clueless techie to crawl around in my machine and fiddle with settings.  That is simply asking for trouble. I'm perfectly capable of opening panels and following instructions myself. DC should be the last thing tried; not the first.

    Bill,  I tried as you suggested - installed every update from 9.1  through 9.3.4.  The 'license not working message persists'. The only change was that now Acrobat will not close and must be forced to shut down from the taskbar menu.  I appreciate the suggestion though.
    Called Adobe (Manila) again, within the hours given on their contact page for installation and licensing issues, and was told "It's Sunday, nobody here can help you".  Finally, after an hour of hammering got them to get me a supervisor (their script says to tell the customer there "Is no supervisor available on Sunday"  -  Finally the "supervisor", Alvin, suggested I need a new serial number and left me on the line while he called someone else to get on. Cameback and informed me that he couldn't get one, I'd have to call Monday (how's that for having solutions?)  Result: wasted more time and had more delay on my project.
    Conclusion:  Adobe has become obsessed and 'piranoic' about piracy and licensing to the extent that they put that first and client/customer needs second (if that).  After reading a lot of online 'Adobe Sucks'  forums, I'm inclined to believe Adobe is shooting itself in its own foot and is not going to be a reliable method of presentation/document transmission in the future - service and support is an integral part of software and other concerns such as piracy or licensing need to be transparent to legitimate users.  Sad that they spend so much time on this, when they need to be fixing real problems.  As well, these outsourcing Philipines companies are poor substitutes for good support - they are so scripted and obsessed with regulations over solutions that it is clear that only the most persistent users will get anywhere with them.  As a frontline of contact with after-sale clients, they are going to cost Adobe a lot of potential business in the future, whatever their short-term savings.  Too bad. Adobe used to be a leader in the market.
    Next round:  Calling Manila again this am. to be continued...

  • Organization licenses issue

    I'd like to install Visual Studio 2013 Express editon on my work computer, which belongs to my company, in my Beijing office.
    I noticed item 1.b in MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS which said I couldn't use it unless so called "person classroom training and education, or for performing academic research", because
    I think my company is probably an enterprise which has 250+ PCs and more than one million annual revenues.
    I just want to use it for my personal intention, like testing a samll C++ program which has nothing to do with my company's product, building a platform env for other script programs, writing code for studying, or something else similar.
    Is there anybody knows if I could do it this way and if it is legal?
    Thanks a lot.

    Hi VisualSystem,
    Thank you for posting in MSDN forum.
    Actually we didn't support the license issue in our forum, to help you resolve this issue and make it clear for you, you could use the following way:
    For a license issue, you can call 1-800-426-9400, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. (Pacific Time) to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist, and you can get more detail information from there. You can also visit the following
    site for more information and support on licensing issues:
    http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/mplahome.mspx
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • My free trial has expired a week into the trial. I have contacted support and they haven't solved the issue. Stated to use forum to solve my license issue for this computer.

    My free trial has expired a week into the trial. I have contacted support and they haven't solved the issue. Stated to use forum to solve my license issue for this computer.

    Did you have an Adobe trial running on this same computer before?  Maybe your previous trial was used for 3 weeks and then you uninstalled it?  If so, you're only eligible for a 1 week trial on this computer.
    Nancy O.

  • Issue with CC 2014 applications asking me to login and license every time.

    Hi,
    Having an issue with Creative Cloud 2014 application asking me to sign in and license the software every time i open them, the sign in works fine and allows me to use the product so why does it constantly ask me to log in every time I open Photoshop, inDesign etc.
    I have tried the following -
    Removing the OOBE folder and reinstalling the CC app but still not luck happens in both the admin account and standard user account where it will ask you to license the software everytime.
    Found this http://www.urbansouldesign.co.uk/web-tips/adobe-creative-cloud-asking-for-serial-number/ but when changes made unable to open the apps at all and tells me they need to be reinstalled.
    Remove the user from teams and re invited but problem still there after that too.
    Signed in on another machine fine and licensed the software with no problems.
    Any ideas or help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Anthony

    A chat session where an agent may remotely look inside your computer may help
    Creative Cloud chat support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html

  • REgarding licensing issues involvng 'Computername' and the use of UpperCase4 vs Lowercase Letters

    Does any one know if it would cause problems for the Office 365 software license to be displayed as licensed to an ALL CAPS name like 'MY-FAVORITE-PC' but the computer itself shows the computer name to be 'my-favorite-pc"?
    If it does, which one should I change?  A couple of people here have had this same problem (which usually occurs when they change to using a different PC for their account) I have to Deactivate their Old PC namer and then install the licnse to
    their New OC using whatever name it has.
    On more than one system, this has resulted in various odd "failure to contact Microsoft server" issues when activating.  The problem continues for 7 days and then their copy of Office starts showing reed warning bards and eventually gets totally
    unusable.
    However, if I uninstall the office, deactivate the license, and reinstall it once again, it install just fine and acts ok but invariably at some point, the same thing occurs.
    On one of them I noticed the difference in the case of the letters used in the computer name and the license name.  On others I am wondering about various software add ins for Outlook or some other 3rd part application causing the problem.  Whatever
    it is, it gets extremely annoying.  Officer 365 apparently must run an activation sequence almost constantly while Office 2010 (and I presume 2013) ran it once and were done with it.
    Searching Google I have found too many  possible reasons along with a lot of people who have had the same problems but no one seems to have the 100% solution.   This has only started happening since we switched to Office 365 and only
    seems to occur on systems that are changed out to different ones with the same User's 365 Account which is in good standing  and has 5 available licenses of which only one is in use.
    In the case of the caps vs lowercase I also wonder if changing the name to CAPS on their PC would create additional problems on its own?

    Hi Questorfla,
    For the Office 365 software license issue, I recommend you can post in dedicated Office 365 Forum to get a better response:
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148.aspx
    If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
    Best Regards,
    Anna Wang

  • Multi-Lang support and slides issue

    First, is anyone here using slides-based Flash documents at
    all? Whenever I post my (IMHO well-researched) questions/reports,
    like the one linked to below, I never get an answer. By now I'm
    ready to give up completely on slide-based documents and ready to
    convert it all to "flat" Flash docs, but I'm just curious why the
    numerous horrible bugs in slides get no response, did everyone else
    but me know not to use them???
    (older problem, actually more a report because there is no
    solution, it's clearly a bug IMHO:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=15&catid=288&threadid =1255720&enterthread=y)
    Anyway, I found a new issue, which, like last time, I first
    successfully and easily recreated using a fresh (slide-based)
    document to make sure my AS code isn't interferring.
    Doing the same experiment with bot a "normal" Flash document
    and with a slide-based one, I created a dynamic text field and
    followed (Macromedia/Adobe) instructions to setup multi-language
    support (en,de) for the text field, using the Strings dialogue.
    It all worked as it should in the regular Flash doc, but
    nothing worked in the slide-based one. Right now I'm trying to see
    if I can still get it to work using the Locale class and AS code,
    but that doesn't seem to work either.
    Again, by now I've pretty much decided to abandon slide-based
    layout because of the bugs and the non-existing feedback, I'm only
    curious if I was the only one who ever even tried slides...(?)

    this should work. One thing to keep in mind is that Swing components have fonts set on them, so if the font you are using doesn't contain the characters, then you get garbage sometimes (I see this with japanese characters when they pump into an app I'm currently writing, even though I know I got the right character codes out of the email).
    Try base64 encoding the content before it is sent and save it (the base64) to a text file (Don't send the base64 text, send the actual content). Then base64 encode the content when it is recieved and compare it to the stored file (without the whole displaying thing). If they match, your issue isn't javamail, it is probably swing, or you aren't setting the character encodings correctly. If they don't match, javamail.
    Just taking bets I would say the two will match and your issue is simply the swing font thing.

  • T440S to T440s - program and data transfer, OS licensing issue

    Hi,
    Obviously not able to open these critters up. I have a new T440s that I would like to transfer my programs and data to.  Is there a program out there that can do this without having to pull out the hard drive to image?
    My current one has Windows 8.1. The new one has Windows 7 with the Windows 8.1 recovery discs.  Issue is, I believe that the Windows license is tied to the hardware?  Therefore I would have to make a recovery disc set of Windows 7.....then use the Windows 8.1 recovery discs then move my programs and data over. 
    Windows Easy Transfer does not look like it can do the best job.
    I thought about bringing it to the store for them to swap the drives but then worried alot about the whole licensing issue.  (not to mention the possible loss of my warranty) Unless if it is done professional and the license could be stripped out of the existing drive and new drive moved to new machine....perhaps a way to get the license keys from the new system somehow.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello.
    If you look at the bottom of the machines, and they both have the Windows 8 sticker, your machines are licenced and the product key is embedded in the BIOS.
    You can use this program: ProduKey to view and write down your keys, but if you use either the Recovery disks or a WIndows 8 Pro retail DVD to reinstall Windows, your key will be picked up automatically by the installation.
    For migration of your files, programs and settings, you could simply clone your current WIndows 8.1 installation onto the new drive using, assuming your installation is UEFI and thus your HD is GPT partitioned, Macrium Reflect, which many users here have had a good experience with. That would save you time from having to reinstall Windows on the new machine as well and all you'd have to do is to enter the embedded Windows key of your new machine to activate it.
    Macrium Reflect
    That's at least one suggestion, but there are many ways to go about this.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers!
    ThinkPad W540 (20BG) - i7-4800MQ/24GB // ThinkPad T440s (20AQ) - i7-4600U/12GB
    ThinkPad T440p (20AW) - i7-4800MQ/16GB // ThinkPad Helix (3698-6EU) - i5-3337U/4GB
    ThinkPad W520 (4282-W4Q) - i7-2720QM/32GB // ThinkPad T400 (2767-W1C) - P9500/8GB
    ThinkPad T61 (7665-CTO) - T7700/4GB // ThinkPad T60p (8741-C2G) - T7400/4GB

  • Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC

    Hi,
    The SAP GRC 10.0 solution comes as bundled solution for AC, PC and RM. While downloading the SAP GRC 10.0 all the three components are downloaded but in a dormant state.
    With the release of GRC 10.0, Access Control and Process Control are offered as an integrated solution, both at the data layer and at the user interface layer. This new unified platform enables increased harmonization of key master data.
    GRC 10.0 is a harmonized platform. Although maintenance of data within AC and PC is similar in 10.0 as it was in previous releases, there are some key differences. The following master data is shared between AC and PC for the release 10.0 integration scenario.
    u2022 Organizations
    u2022 Business Processes
    u2022 Business Subprocesses
    u2022 Controls
    SAP GRC System Add-ons:
    Access Control, Process Control and Risk Management are contained in one ABAP add-on u201CGRCFND_Au201D
    SAP Backend System Plug-ins:
    A. GRCPINW: NW Function Modules hold the AC functions for ERP systems without HR (former non-HR RTA)
    B. GRCPIERP: PC relevant features are contained in the plug-in GRCPIERP, for example, for running automated controls and the HR relevant functions for AC (former HR RTA)
    There are multiple activation points for AC, PC and RM:
    u2022 SAP GRC SPRO -> activate the Application. However
    u2022 When we go for the Plug-ins (GRCPIERP) installation in backend systems with HR function module it also brings in the PC relevant features.
    u2022 Mitigating Control definition based on Organizations
    I had activated the Application AC and PC for some time assuming that PC is required to create the Mitigation Control and Organizations. However I just realized that Mitigating Control and Organization can be created even without Activating PC, which does nothing but removes the additional features of PC.
    My Query:
    u2022 Kindly let me know if I can still use PC to create and assign Mitigating Control as a shared resource for AC and PC or I have violated Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC when I am supposed to use just Access Control.
    u2022 How is shared resources in SAP GRC 10 dealt in terms of Licensing of Applications in SAP GRC 10.
    Thanking you in advance.

    all the new pc's we've purchased for a time now, don't have a Win7 CoA product key attached, even though they come with Win7 downgrade rights, so your strategy to use the CoA pkeys for the Win7 install on the new machines might be flawed.
    We don't buy HP, and I'm in Australia, so I'm not sure if this will be the same for you.
    Also, the OEM image that you would use to re-deploy/re-image with, may need to be different for varying models (OEMs might include different drivers, or other checks or blockers, in their image and OOBE scripts), and, the embedded OEM "master" product key/certificate
    could vary (or not align) across model types/generations.
    Ours do have the SLIC table in firmware and the OA markers, and we use VL Win7 Enterprise anyway, so our 40,000 machine fleet means VL and Software Assurance as a part of our EA + Select is an (expensive) no-brainer really.
    The other thought I have for you, is the re-imaging rights that are bestowed when you have a VL agreement (and therefore, are not bestowed if you don't have one). Because we do have a VL agreement, I've never dived into how it might be worked if we didn't
    have VL.
    http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/reimaging.aspx
    http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/downgrade-rights.aspx
    If you do look at a VL agreement, I'm told they start from as few as 5 machines. And, if you purchase new pc's, you have the option to enrol the new pc's into Software
    Assurance within 90days of purchase, which I imagine would save you some cost, compared to attaching SA to them at a later time, presumably requiring you to pay full ticket price for that.
    I'd recommend you get some advice from an MS reseller, even if only to work out what the various options/costs might be.
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • Hi there, I moved to a new country (Luxembourg ), my previous card is not working anymore, I am trying to change country and region but it looks like the option is not available, could you support on the issue please ? Thx ahead, Corneliu

    Hi there, I moved to a new country (Luxembourg ), my previous card is not working anymore, I am trying to change country and region but it looks like the option is not available, could you support on the issue please ? Thx ahead, Corneliu

    CHANGING APPLE ID/EDIT ACCOUNT INFORMATION/CHANGE ITUNES COUNTRY
    Tap Settings / iTunes & App Stores, then tap the Apple ID signed in. Sign out of the current Apple ID account and then sign in with another account or create a new Apple ID http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2731?viewlocale=en_US
    Go to settings/facetime and tap the ID there and log out and log in with new ID.
    Go to settings/messages and turn off imessages wait 30 seconds and turn it back on, go to “receive messages  at” tap on the ID there, sign out and sign in with new ID.
    Go to settings/icloud and delete the account and when prompted select “keep information on your device” then turn it back on with the new ID.
    To edit account information tap Settings / iTunes & App Stores / Apple ID: / View Apple ID
    To change your iTunes Store country, sign in to the account for the iTunes Store region you would like to use, tap Settings/iTunes & App Store/Apple ID/View Apple ID/Country/Region
    Read this article for information http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1311

  • HT4623 I updated to iOS 6.1, now the mail application will not load. My settings for each email account are still in there, I have synched several times, and rebooted several times. Sill nothing. Why is there no support for upgrade issues ??

    I refuse to pay for support for an issue caused by an upgrade. That is just ridiculous.

    I'm having the exact same problem.  When I select an email the mail application pauses for a couple seconds, the screen goes black and then I go to the home screen.  Have you found anything more on this issue?  Didn't have this problem before upgrading to 6.1.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error during open standby database in read only mode

    hi, alter database open read only; alter database open read only ERROR at line 1: ORA-10458: standby database requires recovery ORA-01152: file 1 was not restored from a sufficiently old backup ORA-01110: data file 1: '/u02/app/oracle/oradata/standby

  • Save as PDF file... doesn't save

    When I print as a PDF file a document (webpage, word ecc.) the process does'not work. It starts creating the file (I can see the file name created on the destination folder) but at the end of the process the file is cancelled by the system and I cann

  • Finding Inactive Transformation

    Hi Guys.   Is there any programe to find out all the inactive transformations in BI 7.0 system. Thanks in advance peter b

  • Recommended Recovery Options for Corrupt Objects

    Hello ,   When I ran DBCC CHECKDB on one of my databases, I noticed few objects being corrupt. Msg 2533, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: page (1:915964) allocated to object ID 1105439012, index ID 1, partition ID 72057594129612800, alloc unit

  • In Share point 2013 how to add more than 2 group by in list

    In Share point 2013 how to add more than 2  group by in list .