JDBC - MS SQL Server 2005 with multible instances

I want to get data from a Microsoft SQL Server via JDBC. We have such a scenario and till now it works fine. Now we have a second instance at the sql server and we want to connect to this instance. I've found the following MSD article:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms378428.aspx
<b>SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 allow for the installation of multiple database instances per server. Each instance is identified by a specific name. To connect to a named instance of SQL Server, you can either specify the port number of the named instance (preferred), or you can specify the instance name as a JDBC URL property or a datasource property. If no instance name or port number property is specified, a connection to the default instance is created. See the following examples:
To use a port number, do the following:
jdbc:sqlserver://localhost:1433;integratedSecurity=true;<more properties as required>;
To use a JDBC URL property, do the following:
jdbc:sqlserver://localhost;instanceName=instance1;integratedSecurity=true;<more properties as required>;</b>
Because the named instance has no explicit port  I've tried to use the second one but this doesn't work. I've tried all possible combinations of these parameters but either I get an error or my adapter connects to the first instance
Any idea how I can connect to the second named instance?

We have also a SQL server 2000 instance at the same server. Yesterday I have spoken with the sql server admin and he told me that he has disconnect the sql server 2000 databases whatever this means. :-D
Now all works fine. Thank you for your help
BTW I use the following connection string:
jdbc:sqlserver://my_db_server;instanceName=my_instance_name;DatabaseName=my_db_name

Similar Messages

  • How to enable high availability on SQL Server 2005 with Windows Server 2008 Enterprise R2

    Dear Folks,
    I would like to ask you about this thing. I'm working for IT department for bank in Myanmar. Our bank have up to 96 branches across all of Myanmar including H.O. We are using Microsoft SQL Server 2005 with Windows Server 2008 for our banking
    information system. My main problem is having to backup and restore the database backup files every time the servers in branches goes down for whatever reasons. I want to deploy this feature of high availability and failover cluster using Windows Server 2008
    and SQL Server 2005. Our branches have 2 Servers. One is for Primary and other is for Backup. What I want to do is that, I want to change Backup Server to Primary Server whenever the Primary Server goes down for whatever reasons. All the working data and databases
    from Primary will immediately replicated into Backup Server along with all the IP information of Primary Server. Please give me step by step guide for this process.

    Try below
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cindygross/archive/2009/10/23/checklist-for-installing-sql-server-2005-as-a-clustered-instance.aspx
    I will recommend you to upgrade SQL server to newer version for support as well as flexibility.
    Regards,
    Vishal Patel
    Blog: http://vspatel.co.uk
    Site: http://lehrity.com

  • I want to use Golden Gate to connect MS SQL Server 2005 with Oracle 10g dat

    I want to use Golden Gate to connect MS SQL Server 2005 with Oracle 10g database. So, i have installed both databases on different pc's on windows platform. MS SQL Server 2005 on windows XP and Oracle 10g on windows 2003.
    I have configure Golden Gate step by step by following oracle guideline:
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/datawarehouse/oracle-sqlserver-goldengate-460262.html
    When i run following command on target (oracle 10g):
    replicat paramfile dirprm/inload.prm
    I encounterd following error:
    2012-05-21 20:27:06 ERROR OGG-00014 Unrecognized parameter: USERID. Paramete
    r could be misspelled or unsupported.
    2012-05-21 20:27:06 ERROR OGG-01668 PROCESS ABENDING.
    My INLOAD FILE Content are:
    SPECIALRUN
    END RUNTIME
    USERID gg_user, PASSWORD welcome1
    EXTFILE D:\oracle\gg\dirdat\ex
    SOURCEDEFS D:\oracle\gg\dirdef\emp.def
    MAP hrschema.emp, TARGET gg_user.emp;
    Can you plz suggest me that where i am wrong?
    Thanks advance to all experts.

    amardeep.sidhu wrote:
    That should work, just in case try adding DBLOGIN before USERID
    DBLOGIN USERID x..No needed in the param file i think.its not needed at all you are right, but what else could it be? Besides any special unseen character :P

  • SQL Server 2005 with an ODBC-JDBC Bridge

    Hello,
    I use an ODBC - JDBC Bridge (because when I use SQL Server 2005 Driver JDBC Version 1.1, the text connection failed). I don't know why I can't reverse my model.
    What happened?
    thanks
    Billie

    We have also a SQL server 2000 instance at the same server. Yesterday I have spoken with the sql server admin and he told me that he has disconnect the sql server 2000 databases whatever this means. :-D
    Now all works fine. Thank you for your help
    BTW I use the following connection string:
    jdbc:sqlserver://my_db_server;instanceName=my_instance_name;DatabaseName=my_db_name

  • Selecting from a SQL Server 2005 with long column names ( 30 chars)

    Hi,
    I was able to set up a db link from Oracle 11.2.0.1 to SQL Server 2005 using DG4ODBC.
    My problem is that some column names in the Sql Server are longer than 30 chars and trying to select them gives me the ORA-00972: identifier is too long error.
    If I omit these columns the select succeeds.
    I know I can create a view in the sql server and query it instead of the original table, but I was wondering if there's a way to overcome it with sql.
    My select looks like this:
    select "good_column_name" from sometable@sqlserver_dblink -- this works
    select "good_column_name","very_long_column_name>30 chars" from sometable@sqlserver_dblink -- ORA-00972Thanks

    I tried creating a view with shorter column names but selecting from the view still returns an error.
    create view v_Boards as (select [9650_BoardId] as BoardId, [9651_BoardType] as BoardType, [9652_HardwareVendor] as
    HardwareVendor, [9653_BoardVersion] as BoardVersion, [9654_BoardName] as BoardName, [9655_BoardDescription] as BoardDescription,
    [9656_SlotNumber] as SlotNumber, [9670_SegmentId] as SegmentId, [MasterID] as MasterID, [9657_BoardHostName] as BoardHostName,
    [9658_BoardManagementUsername] as BoardManagementUsername, [9659_BoardManagementPassword] as BoardManagementPassword,
    [9660_BoardManagementVirtualAddress] as BoardManagementVirtualAddress, [9661_BoardManagementTelnetLoginPrompt] as
    MANAGEMENTTELNETLOGINPROMPT, [9662_BoardManagementTelnetPasswordPrompt] as MANAGEMENTTELNETPASSPROMPT,
    [9663_BoardManagementTelnetCommandPrompt] as MANAGEMENTTELNETCOMMANDPROMPT FROM Boards)performing a select * from this view in sqlserver works and show the short column names
    this is the error i'm getting for performing a select * from v_boards@sqlserver_dblink
    ORA-28500: connection from ORACLE to a non-Oracle system returned this message:
    [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Invalid column name 'BoardManagementTelnetLoginProm'. {42S22,NativeErr = 207}[Microsoft]
    [SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Invalid column name 'BoardManagementTelnetPasswordP'. {42S22,NativeErr = 207}[Microsoft][SQL Native
    Client][SQL Server]Invalid column name 'BoardManagementTelnetCommandPr'. {42S22,NativeErr = 207}[Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL
    Server]Statement(s) could not be prepared. {42000,NativeErr = 8180}
    ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from sqlserver_dblinkI also tried replacing the * with specific column names but it fails on the columns that have a long name (it doesn't recognize the short names from the view)
    what am I doing wrong?
    Edited by: Pyrocks on Dec 22, 2010 3:58 PM

  • CONNECT SQL SERVER 2005 WITH Oracle 10.2.0.3

    Hi,
    I used URL http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/10893_3442661_2 but its not working.
    I was reading note# 561033.1 adn planning to try.
    If any one done ,please let me know.

    user587327 wrote:
    its not working" is pretty vague. How about if you tell us
    1) What version of Oracle rdbms you are working with (ok, I see 10.2.0.3 in subject .. good)
    2) what OS it is running on (obviously SQL Server is on Windoze, but that doesn't mean that's where Oracle is) : Linux RHEL 4.4 64 bit
    3) what you are trying to do (get an Oracle database to retrieve data from SQL Server? vice versa? something else?):
    Connect to Oracle database and retrieve data from SQL SERVER 2005.So, you want the Oracle DB to act as a client to the SQL Server db?
    >
    4) what error code (ora-nnnnn or tns-00000) you are getting
    Showing
    SQL> desc spt_values@MYSQL
    ERROR:
    ORA-28545: error diagnosed by Net8 when connecting to an agent
    Unable to retrieve text of NETWORK/NCR message 65535
    ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from MYSQL
    ----I've never used HSO to SQL Server, so I'm getting out of my area here. However ...
    I'm puzzled by the error msg referencing "Net8". Looks like an Oracle 8i construct but you said your db is 10.2. And since the box is Linux I wouldn't expect to find an old 8i installation lurking on it.
    I searched MetaLink (should be everyone's first resource when trying to understand an error message) for "ora-28545" and got 13 hits.
    >
    5) any other diagnostic messages you might have

  • Integrating SQL Server 2005 with OBIEE 11g

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any documentation about how to using SQL Server 2005 as datasource combined with OBIEE 11g?
    Clear steps with pictures will be very helpful.
    Thank so much
    Regards
    JOE

    Hi,
    Please refer this link.
    http://rnm1978.wordpress.com/2009/08/21/querying-sql-server-from-obiee-running-on-unix/
    Re: How to connect Linux OBIEE repository to SQL Server 2005 database
    Hope this help's
    THanks
    Satya

  • Changing installation PATH on SQL Server 2005 with SAP DVD

    Hi experts,
    i would like to install SQL Server 2005 delivered by SAP on another disk, for example D: instead of C:\Program files\
    i read the note 363018 but there's no solution to my problem.
    Thanks in advanced for your help.
    Pascal.

    Hi Markus,
    yes, that's what i have expected but i m not good enought to find the changement to do.
    Am i allowed to post the script?
    Thanks.

  • JDBC Connection String for MS Sql Server 2000 with Instance Name

    Hi All,
    I am having problems connecting to a MS Sql Server 2000 database using MSSqlServer4
    driver when the database server has an Instance Name. If the database server has
    no instance name then I am able to connect using the connection string
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:1433
    But when I have the MS Sql Server DB with an instance name such as "TestInstance",
    then I am unable to connect with any of the connection strings given below
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa\TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa\\TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:1433:TestInstance
    Can anybody help me in resolving this issue. Appreciate your help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Vikram

    Vikram wrote:
    Hi All,
    I am having problems connecting to a MS Sql Server 2000 database using MSSqlServer4
    driver when the database server has an Instance Name. If the database server has
    no instance name then I am able to connect using the connection string
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:1433
    But when I have the MS Sql Server DB with an instance name such as "TestInstance",
    then I am unable to connect with any of the connection strings given below
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa\TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa\\TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:TestInstance:1433 or
    connection=jdbc:weblogic:mssqlserver4:hansa:1433:TestInstance
    Can anybody help me in resolving this issue. Appreciate your help.Hi. No type-4 jdbc driver is going to be able to use a name for a DBMS instance.
    Let's assume you have two DBMS instances running on the machine hansa. One
    of them may be listening for tcp connections on port 1433, but the other must not.
    The other most be listening on some other port number you have chosen.
    Therefore, to choose which DBMS instance you want to connect to, use the
    working URL you have, and switch the port number as desired.
    Joe Weinstein
    >
    >
    Thanks in advance.
    Vikram

  • SQL Server 2005 performance decreases with DB size while SQL Server 2012 is fine

    Hi,
    We have a C# windows service running that polls some files and inserts/updates some fields in database.
    The service was tested on a local dev machine with SQL Server 2012 running and performance was quite decent with any number of records. Later on the service was moved to a test stage environment where SQL Server 2005 is installed. At that point database
    was still empty and service was running just fine but later on, after some 500k records were written, performance problems came to light. After some more tests we've founds out that, basically, database operation performance in SQL Server 2005 decreases with
    a direct correlation with the database size. Here are some testing results:
    Run#
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    DB size (records)
    520k
    620k
    720k
    820k
    920k
    SQL Server 2005
    TotalRunTime
    25:25.1
    32:25.4
    38:27.3
    42:50.5
    43:51.8
    Get1
    00:18.3
    00:18.9
    00:20.1
    00:20.1
    00:19.3
    Get2
    01:13.4
    01:17.9
    01:21.0
    01:21.2
    01:17.5
    Get3
    01:19.5
    01:24.6
    01:28.4
    01:29.3
    01:24.8
    Count1
    00:19.9
    00:18.7
    00:17.9
    00:18.7
    00:19.1
    Count2
    00:44.5
    00:45.7
    00:45.9
    00:47.0
    00:46.0
    Count3
    00:21.7
    00:21.7
    00:21.7
    00:22.3
    00:22.3
    Count4
    00:23.6
    00:23.9
    00:23.9
    00:24.9
    00:24.5
    Process1
    03:10.6
    03:15.4
    03:14.7
    03:21.5
    03:19.6
    Process2
    17:08.7
    23:35.7
    28:53.8
    32:58.3
    34:46.9
    Count5
    00:02.3
    00:02.3
    00:02.3
    00:02.3
    00:02.1
    Count6
    00:01.6
    00:01.6
    00:01.6
    00:01.7
    00:01.7
    Count7
    00:01.9
    00:01.9
    00:01.7
    00:02.0
    00:02.0
    Process3
    00:02.0
    00:01.8
    00:01.8
    00:01.8
    00:01.8
    SQL Server 2012
    TotalRunTime
    12:51.6
    13:38.7
    13:20.4
    13:38.0
    12:38.8
    Get1
    00:21.6
    00:21.7
    00:20.7
    00:22.7
    00:21.4
    Get2
    01:38.3
    01:37.2
    01:31.6
    01:39.2
    01:37.3
    Get3
    01:41.7
    01:42.1
    01:35.9
    01:44.5
    01:41.7
    Count1
    00:20.3
    00:19.9
    00:19.9
    00:21.5
    00:17.3
    Count2
    01:04.5
    01:04.8
    01:05.3
    01:10.0
    01:01.0
    Count3
    00:24.5
    00:24.1
    00:23.7
    00:26.0
    00:21.7
    Count4
    00:26.3
    00:24.6
    00:25.1
    00:27.5
    00:23.7
    Process1
    03:52.3
    03:57.7
    03:59.4
    04:21.2
    03:41.4
    Process2
    03:05.4
    03:06.2
    02:53.2
    03:10.3
    03:06.5
    Count5
    00:02.8
    00:02.7
    00:02.6
    00:02.8
    00:02.7
    Count6
    00:02.3
    00:03.0
    00:02.8
    00:03.4
    00:02.4
    Count7
    00:02.5
    00:02.9
    00:02.8
    00:03.4
    00:02.5
    Process3
    00:21.7
    00:21.0
    00:20.4
    00:22.8
    00:21.5
    One more thing is that it's not Process2 table that constantly grows in size but is Process1 table, that gets almost 100k records each run.
    After that SQL Server 2005 has also been installed on a dev machine just to test things and we got exactly the same results. Both SQL Server 2005 and 2012 instances are installed using default settings with no changes at all. The same goes for databases
    created for the service.
    So the question is - why are there such huge differences between performance of SQL Server 2005 and 2012? Maybe there are some settings that are set by default in SQL Server 2012 database that need to be set manually in 2005?
    What else can I try to test? The main problem is that production SQL Server will be updated god-knows-when and we can't just wait for that.
    Any suggestions/advices are more than welcome.

    ...One more thing is that it's not Process2 table that constantly grows in size but is
    Process1 table, that gets almost 100k records each run....
    Hi,
    It is not clear to me what is that you are doing, but now we have a better understanding on ONE of your tables an it is obviously you will get worse result as the data become bigger. Actually your table look like a automatic build table by ORM like Entity
    Framework, and it's DDL probably do not much your needs. For example if your select query is using a filter on the other column that [setID] then you have no index and the server probably have to scan the entire table in order to find the records that you
    need.
    Forum is a suitable place to seek advice about a specific system (as I mentioned before we are not familiar with your system), and it is more suitable for general questions. For example the fact that you have no index except the index on the column [setID]
    can indicate a problem. Ultimately to optimize the system will need to investigate it more thoroughly (as it is no longer appropriate forum ... but we're not there yet). Another point is that now we can see that you are using [timestamp] column, an this
    implies that your are using this column as a filter for selecting the data. If so, then maybe a better DDL will be to use clustered index on this column and if needed a nonclustered index on the [setID] if it is needed at all...
    what is obviously is that next is to check if this DDL fit
    your specific needs (as i mentioned before).
    Next step is to understand what action do you do with this table. (1) what is your query which become slowly in a bigger data set. (2) Are you using ORM (object relational mapping, like Entity Framework
    code first), and if so then which one.
    [Personal Site] [Blog] [Facebook]

  • Troble configuring Hyperion Shared Services with SQL Server 2005

    I recently installed SQL server (SQL SERVER 2005) in my machine and then am trying to install Hyperion (9.3.1) products. I started with Shared services. It was installed successfully. Problem is occuring when am trying to configure Shared service with SQL database using Hyperion Configuration utility (9.3.1)
    The error which is popping up is
    Unable to connect to the database for the product Hyperion Shared Services.
    Things which I tried from my end
    1. Made sure TCP IP Protocol was enabled in SQL server configuration server.
    2. hypuser was created in SQl server.
    3. hypdb was created in SQL server.
    4. Was having dynamic IP address so install Loopback adapter to obtain Static IP address and port.
    5. Port and IP address was correct.
    Let me know where I am going wrong.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Finally got it fixed firewall settings needed to be change : This document helped me a lot to troubleshoot the issue
    An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 2)
    This problem may occur when SQL Server 2005 is not configured to accept incoming local and remote connections, which is disabled by default in SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition and also SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition. To solve the connection forbidden problem, SQL Server 2005 needs to configure to allow incoming local and remote connections.
    Firstly, ensure that SQL Server 2005 is configured properly to allow incoming connections on the instance of database server, else enable and turn on the local and remote connections setting.
    Click Start button, then go to Programs or All Programs, then select Microsoft SQL Server 2005, followed by Configuration Tools. Click and run the SQL Server Surface Area Configuration.
    On the “SQL Server 2005 Surface Area Configuration” page, click Surface Area Configuration for Services and Connections.
    On the “Surface Area Configuration for Services and Connections” page, expand Database Engine tree, click Remote Connections.
    Select Local and remote connections, or Local connections only which applicable only if there is no remote system tries to connect to the SQL Server, useful when you just trying to connect and authenticate with the server after installing.
    Select the appropriate protocol to enable to local and/or remote connections environment. To ensure maximum compatibility, select Using both TCP/IP and named pipes.
    Click Apply button when done.
    Click OK button when prompted with the message saying that “Changes to Connection Settings will not take effect until you restart the Database Engine service.”
    On the “Surface Area Configuration for Services and Connections” page, expand Database Engine, then click Service.
    Click Stop button to stop the SQL Server service.
    Wait until the MSSQLSERVER service stops, and then click Start button to restart the MSSQLSERVER service.
    Secondly, SQL Server Browser service has to be enabled to allow for local and remote connections if SQL Server 2005 is running by using an instance name and users are not using a specific TCP/IP port number in the connection string.
    Click Start button, then go to Programs or All Programs, then select Microsoft SQL Server 2005, followed by Configuration Tools. Click and run the SQL Server Surface Area Configuration.
    On the “SQL Server 2005 Surface Area Configuration” page, click Surface Area Configuration for Services and Connections.
    On the “Surface Area Configuration for Services and Connections” page, click SQL Server Browser.
    Select Automatic as the Startup type to start SQL Server Browser service automatically every time system starts.
    Click Apply button.
    Click on Start button to start the service immediately.
    Click OK button.
    Finally, if remote computer needs to connect and access SQL Server, an exceptions in Windows Firewall included in Windows XP SP2 (Service Pack 2), Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista needs to be created. If you’re using third-party firewall system, the exception rules also needed to be created to allow external remote connections to the SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server Browser Service to communicate through the firewall, else connections will be blocked. Consult the firewall manual for more details. Each instance of SQL Server 2005 must have its own exception, together with an exclusion for SQL Server Browser service.
    SQL Server 2005 uses an instance ID as part of the path when you install its program files. To create an exception for each instance of SQL Server, you must identify the correct instance ID. To obtain an instance ID, follow these steps:
    Click Start button, then go to Programs or All Programs, then select Microsoft SQL Server 2005, followed by Configuration Tools. Click and run the SQL Server Configuration Manager.
    In “SQL Server Configuration Manager”, click the SQL Server Browser service in the right pane, right-click the instance name in the main window, and then click Properties.
    On the “SQL Server Browser Properties” page, click the Advanced tab, locate the instance ID in the property list.
    Click OK button.
    Then create an exception for SQL Server 2005 in Windows Firewall.
    Click on Start button, the click on Run and type firewall.cpl, and then click OK. For Windows Vista, type firewall.cpl in Start Search box and press Enter key, then click on Allow a program through Windows Firewall link on left tasks pane.
    In “Windows Firewall”, click the Exceptions tab, and then click Add Program.
    In the “Add a Program” window, click Browse button.
    Click the C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Binn\sqlservr.exe executable program, click Open button. MSSQL.1 with is a placeholder for the instance ID that is obtained from previous procedure. Note that the path may be different depending on where SQL Server 2005 is installed.
    Click OK button.
    Repeat steps 1 through 5 for each instance of SQL Server 2005 that needs an exception.
    For SQL Server Browser service, locate the C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Shared\sqlbrowser.exe executable program, and click Open button.
    Click OK button.

  • Connect jdeveloper with sql server 2005

    hello, I don't speak english very well, how I do to connect sql server 2005 with jdeveloper using create connections without username and password, using windows autentication. I downloaded driver jdbc from microsoft pages, when I create the connections and click test connections, the conecctions failed because I don't have username and pass in sql server. Thanks and sorry for my english. Regards

    When the SQL Server is installed a password is specified for the 'sa' user, or a new SQL Server user may also be created.
    Please refer
    http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/33681

  • Working with SQL Server 2005

    We are trying to use SQL Server 2005 with JSC2. Got the JDBC driver from Microsoft and added the sqljdbc.jar and created new database server too.
    What else to be done to connect ? Want to make use of the interoperability of these products quickly
    Thanks
    Prasath

    Here is URL related to database access FAQ.
    http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/javatools/jscreator/reference/faqs/technical/dbaccess/
    Take a look at
    11. How do I configure data sources for Oracle, Sybase, SQL Server, or DB2 in the Java Studio Creator IDE?

  • JDBC Connectivity for SQL Server 2005 Windows Authentication Mode

    Hi Everyone,
    In my Scenario we are using SQL Server 2005 with Mixed Mode Authentication. Now we are planning to move only with Windows Authentication Mode.
    We have configured DB with Window authentication mode & user id have been configured in PI channels however we are getting error. We checked microsoft site, which says Windows Authentication mode DB can not be connected using JDBC drivers.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/313100
    In this above link see Basic Connectivity Troubleshooting Section.
    Please let me know if someone confirued JDBC Channel Successfuly with Windows Authentication Mode.
    Thanks In Advance
    Regards,
    Bharathi.

    I think this issue is related to the way that Vista, Windows 7 and Windows 2008 / 2008 R2 treat users who are logged on to the system with an account that is a member of the local administrators group when SQL is running locally.
    If your SQL setup has left you with BUILTIN\Administrators being a member of the sysadmin server role and you start up SQL Management Studio you'd expect to be mapped to the sysadmin role if your user account is in the local administrators group, however
    these OS disable this ability and when you try to connect to the database engine SQL server doesn't know you are a member of the local administrators group.
    To get round this, close all your open SQL management studio windows and then start a new window by right clicking the icon in the start menu and chosing to run as administrator. This time when you try to connect to the SQL database engine, windows doesn't
    "hide" the fact that you are an administrator. If you need to do this a lot you can go to the compatibility tab on the properties of the shortcut and set it to always run as administrator.
    Alternatively you can install the admin tools remotely and you don't get this effect.
    Tim

  • SQL Server 2005 replaced with SQL Server 2014 trying to connect front end Access as guest (read only ODBC)

    We have replaced a SQL Server 2005 with a SQL Server 2014 (new physical server.)  Have the new server set up to use SQL Server login OR Windows user login. Had old server connecting (for a particular DB) to front end Access (2010 or 2013) as guest for
    anyone logged into the Windows NT Network with a read only ODBC connection. Have the DB in the new server set to include guest as db_datareader (with only SELECT permission for the securables of each table and view being linked) but when any Windows user not
    specifically listed as a SQL DB user tries to use the front end they get an error of:
    Microsoft SQL Server Login
    Connection failed:
    SQL State: '28000'
    SQL Server Error: 18456
    [Microsoft][OCBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] Login failed for user {domain\user}.
    After closing that pop-up window a server login window appears. Of course, since the guest user is not specifically listed as a user in the DB that fails also. It seems like there should be a very simple solution to this, but I can't seem to find it. I want
    to allow anyone logged in on the Windows system (locally) to be able to open the MS Access file (on their work station machine) and run their own (read only; select) queries on the SQL Server database. Any suggestions?
    Thanks a billion in advance ----

    Thanks for the response Olaf. I have now spent weeks researching this. I realize that using the guest account in most situations is not advised. As mentioned, I have restricted the guest account to allow the db_datareader role only, and have explicitly denied
    all other roles, as well as allowing select only, and still have no access for the guest account.
    The suggested fix in the second link you provided, of using Windows groups is not plausible for my situation either. We are a scientific field research institution, with a few long term users and lots of users that may have Windows accounts for a few months,
    and then they are gone. It would be a nightmare for the network tech to try to keep a group account up to date, and we need to give access (read only, of course) to anyone logged into the system. Realize that the ONLY access of any kind to this database is
    thru MS Access ACCDB, using a (by default) read only OCDB connection.
    This type of access is used particularly because researchers need to be able to set up their own queries, and the MS Access query interface is particularly convenient for people who are not themselves SQL experts, yet are trying to get some very advanced
    levels of output. Putting the database online is not practical because then we are back to the need for a comprehensive query interface, and just picking up general subsets of the data online (from a basic web page search feature) would be out of the question,
    since the result set would involve hundreds of thousands if not millions of records.
    So - that said - what exactly would you suggest, assuming we don't have the funds to buy a whole new system, and have spent plenty of money with Microsoft's Enterprise level MS Office so that all work stations have MS Access, and Microsoft's SQL Server,
    as well as running our network on Microsoft's network software.

Maybe you are looking for