JDBC odbc performance issue...

I know this is not the right place to post this memo but some of you are very nice and have deep knowledge of what i am going to ask....
I have a java programme which call a stored procedure using oracle callable
( OracleCallableStatement ) slowConn.prepareCall( "{ call my_stored_proc(?,?) }");
which takes about less than a second..
Now, if i run this in a loop, in other words if this get calls multiple times, my cpu go crazy... almost 99% with 50 calls to this stored procedure if ran ||.
I checked about caching it. I did cached it but still my cpu consumption is same.
Any help is great. My connections are hopfully being closed or being opened as required..
Thanks in advance..

I know this is not the right place to post this memo
but some of you are very nice and have deep knowledge
of what i am going to ask....
I have a java programme which call a stored procedure
using oracle callable
( OracleCallableStatement )
slowConn.prepareCall( "{ call my_stored_proc(?,?)
which takes about less than a second..
Now, if i run this in a loop, in other words if this
get calls multiple times, my cpu go crazy... almost
99% with 50 calls to this stored procedure if ran
||.
I checked about caching it. I did cached it but
still my cpu consumption is same.
Any help is great. My connections are hopfully
being closed or being opened as required..
Thanks in advance..Hello,
Are you opening and closing the connection in the for loop??
It is better to use a single connection and call the procedure multiple times.
I hopes this helps you..
Thanks and Regards,
prasanna.

Similar Messages

Jdbc odbc connectivity issue

I have made one system dsn ...in some folder..then in my jsp page my
Class.forName ("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver").newInstance();
Connection myConn = DriverManager.getConnection."jdbc:odbc:Employee");im getting error like no data source...and its finding in root directory like c:/document seting etc etc ..not where my db lies
if i put my db in root directory .then code wrks fine..but is it taking that root directory

well well the code would not consider nothing here the microsoft native bridge driver has to find appropriate database.
Are you sure u have created an entry in Odbc Data Source Administrator --> System DSN -> and you have a name called "Employee" out their pointing to appropriate database which you are trying to connect.

CF8 ODBC performance issues w/ SQL 2K5

Problem: A basic "select *" query returning 5 rows is taking
a little over 5000ms.
Platform: Vista Business, CF8 Developer, MS SQL 2K5 Developer
SP2, ODBC Socket using trusted connection
I ran a query against cfartgallery without any performance
problems. Leads me to believe this is an ODBC issue.
(Server monitor memory tracking is off.)
Does anybody have any suggested fixes? Thank you.

gdemaria -
I reverted back to using MX7 rather than 8.
I tried using the JDBC driver, which is the default driver on
the first screen--where you have to specify a username and password
and you connect over port 1433-- but I couldn't get that to work.
(This is probably a problem with my SQL server configuration.)
My plan is to play around some more with the JDBC driver. Or,
wait and see if I get an ODBC solution from the forum here. For now
I will develop on MX7 and use CF8 in the live hosting
environment---not an ideal situation, but it's workable.

JDBC & orcacl performance issue..

I know this is not the right place to post this memo but some of you are very nice and have deep knowledge of what i am going to ask....
I have a java programme which call a stored procedure using oracle callable
( OracleCallableStatement ) slowConn.prepareCall( "{ call my_stored_proc(?,?) }");
which takes about less than a second..
Now, if i run this in a loop, in other words if this get calls multiple times, my cpu go crazy... almost 99% with 50 calls to this stored procedure if ran ||.
I checked about caching it. I did cached it but still my cpu consumption is same.
Any help is great. My connections are hopfully being closed or being opened as required..
Thanks in advance..

I don't have an answer, but profiling the jdbc connection in jamon may give you an idea what method is slow. It works with oracle, is free and requires no code changes.
http://jamonapi.sourceforge.net/#WhatsNew22

Slow performance of JDBC - ODBC MS ACCESS

I experience a very slow performance for jdbc-odbc using ms access as the database. This program works fine with other computer (in term of performance). However, the harddrive is cranking big time with this computer (this is the fastest one among the computers I tested, and also has many gigabytes left to be used). The database is very small. Other computer use exactly the same java version and msaccess driver version. If anyone found the same problem, or have any suggestion please help. Thank you.

I am having the same problem with one machine as well. Running MS Access 2000 (unfortunately), and all machines run well with one exception. DB reads take about 10 seconds each. If a solution has been found, please report.
--Dave

Performance issues in Proxy-XI-Jdbc scenario

Hello,
I have developed a proxy to JDBC synchronous scenario.
My scenario works like this.
*i run an abap program which calls a client proxy,
the proxy fetches the data from database table and returns the data in the ABAP program.(select query)
there are serious performance issues when we are running the report
it is taking around 2-5 minutes and at times multiple users are logged in , it takes around 5-20 minutes.
it seems that most of the time is consumed in the data fetching.
please help me to find some solution so that we can fine tune the performance on the PI side.
Are there any options on JDBC CC which can help us in making the queries faster
thanks
kannu.

Kanu16 ,
Issue seems to be at r/3 end..
1. Make sur ethat report program is using select query in proper fashion .
2. avoid using nested loops.
3. Hope not much validations are being done on selected data .
Abaper can help you optimizing this .
By debugging you can find out the exact reason behind.
Regards ,

JDBC-ODBC Bridge Performance To MS Access

Hey all, I'm running a Java app that extracts an entire table (set of tables) from Oracle and copies them into Access. The easiest implementation has been to use a DSN-less Type 1 JDBC-ODBC bridge connection to Access, but unfortunately the inserts are taking too long.
I have tried both Statement and PreparedStatement approaches, with both single row and batch updates. Some of the performance times, relative to the computer I am on (PIII 1 gHz with 256 RAM), are as follows:
Via Batch, about 8min, 15 seconds per 10,000 rows.
Via Single Row updates/inserts, about 52 minutes for 45,000 rows.
I've tried alot of varieties with batch, but 10,000 seemed to be the best. The largest table is only 45,000 rows (right now), but has the potential to grow much larger (obviously). This application needs to backup 4 databases, each with N tables (current N=7, but will expand). I'm trying to knock down the times and increase performance, but am not sure what is "reasonable" for Type 1 connections with JDBC. I've seen third party drivers, Type 3, for Access...but don't want to run the middle tier server for filtering request through. I'd rather use Type 4, but can't seem to find any for Access.
Any suggestions? Recommendations? Let me know! Thanks all! :)

Hi,
If its a backup/batch process why are you worrying about performance, its only an offline process :) even if has to be triggered during an OLTP run this task asynchronously.
I dont know why you have chosen java to do this ??? any way prepared statements with non scrollable resultsets will increase you performance better tha scrollable normal statements.
Rajesh

Jdbc:odbc driver connection issues

I need to use the jdbc:odbc driver to access a non-oracle db from a jsp. I am sure my dsn is fine as I can use a non JSP java app to connect to the odbc db. I have loaded the sun.jdbc.odbc classes in the schema I am working in as it is not loaded by default in 9.2.0.7 currently I am on a windows system. I have found the following:
public static void doTest()throws Exception{
// load the local Oracle Driver
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
connLocalOracle = new OracleDriver().defaultConnection();
// load the odbc driver
Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
if I exit at this point the jsp does not through an exception
however if I include the line:
connODBC = DriverManager.getConnection(odbcURL,"XX","XX");
I get the error:
SQL> execute do_jdbc_odbc_test;
BEGIN do_jdbc_odbc_test; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29532: Java call terminated by uncaught Java exception:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbc.allocConnect
ORA-06512: at "TU1.DO_JDBC_ODBC_TEST", line 0
ORA-06512: at line 1
So I am assuming I am loading the driver but the driver is not talking to the odbc configuration in windows.
What permissions would I need to give to the user to allow this connection to occur?
How can I find out if this is indeed the case?
If not how can I make this connection happen using ODBC?

If by jsp you mean Java Stored Procedure, the hybrid JDbc-ODBC stack won't work. You can connect to non-Oracle RDBMS from within Java in the database by using a pure Java JDBC driver of the target RDBM. Fwiw, a complete example connecting to SQl Server from with JavaDB is described in my upcoming book. (See http://db360.blogspot.com/)
Kuassi

JDBC-ODBC Bridge is too slow

Why the Sun JDBC-ODBC Bridge is so slow? When i use the ms bridge it is as faster than a JDBC connection, but i found a bug on the ms bridge that it returns NULL when the value is a "" (blank)
Anyone how to make sun bridge has a acceptable perfomance?
I am using MySQL 3.23 and tested on Sun JDKs 1.1.8, 1.2, 1.4
My comp is a K6-2 400 with 128 RAM
Thanks

isjm said
   I've found using a pure JDBC driver (ashna's JTurbo) to be
   roughly 40% faster than the bridge after doing some
   (admitidly) small amount of bench testing. I also found
   it resolved a number of issues (bugs??) with the bridge
   (e.g. no longer throws an occasional fractional truncation
   exception when inserting timestamps). As for the bridge
   being used only for test purposes check out this URL:
   http://java.sun.com/J2se/1.3.0/docs/guide/jdbc/getstart/bridge.doc.html
   They recommend using the bridge only for experimental use or when a
   pure driver is not available. I guess you could consider this as test purposes only.There is no such thing as a 'pure driver' (or 'pure jdbc driver' from a different post.)
The doc you site suggests a 'pure java' driver - a type 4. I question that. I know there are number of things that one can do in ODBC and in OCI which speed up requests. And obviously one can't do those in java.
Performance problems are caused by the following:
-Requirements-most impact
-Design
-Environment (cpu,network,thread, etc bottlenecks)
-Language/intefaces - least impact.
Changing requirements/design can easily produce impacts of orders of magnitude (by removing one requirement I reduce a 4-8 hour report to less than 30 seconds.) So how much impact did the 40% you saw impact your total application? Did you profile your application/system under load using a automated tool to measure the speed?
I would suspect also that the suggestion that the driver is 'experimental use or when no other alternative is available' might be slightly biased as the driver was produced by Merant who is actively selling drivers too. One would suppose that they were not allowed to deliberately introduce bugs into the code. However, they might have insisted that some language be introduced to suggest that someone should buy the product.
anarquia said
   But i can't believe i've tested today again and the sun
   bridge is working as fast the ms bridge! i can't
   understand, yesterday i've tested a million times
   and it was about 30 times slower, i'll try to find
   what's happened yesterdayDid you use a closed network? Did you use isolated servers?

JDBC-ODBC vs ORM

if my current application is pulling data from my database via jdbc-odbc connection quite well, for what reason(s) should I consider switching to ORM, i.e. using hibernate, toplink, etc.
the only issue I have currently is retrieving result sets with rows in the tens of thousands... when i run query on database engine itself, it takes atleast 5 mins (with all the different joins in my query)... the data actually displays via my jsp page in about 15-30 seconds longer....
my top concern here obviously is speed... will ORM tools like hibernate, toplink, etc. make a huge difference in performance?

No, ORM technology typically sits on top of JDBC technology.
Sorry, but that is the best answer i can give you.
Best of Luck,
Nate

JDBC-ODBC Bridge to SPSS data files - Result Set Type is not supported

Hello,
As mentioned in the subject I am trying to read SPSS data files using the SPSS 32-Bit data driver, ODBC and the JDBC-ODBC Bridge.
Using this SPSS Driver I manged to read the data directly into an MS-SQL Server using:
SELECT [...] FROM
OPENROWSET(''MSDASQL.1'',''DRIVER={SPSS 32-BIT Data Driver (*.sav)};DBQ=' SomePathWhereTheFilesAre';SERVER=NotTheServer'', ''SELECT 'SomeSPSSColumn' FROM "'SomeSPSSFileNameWithoutExt'"'') AS a
This works fine!
Using Access and an ODBC System DNS works for IMPORTING but NOT for LINKING.
It is even possible to read the data using the very slow SPSS API.
However, when it comes to JDBC-ODBC the below code does only work in part. The driver is loaded successfully, but when it comes to transferring data into the resultset object the error
SQLState: null
Result Set Type is not supported
Vendor: 0
occurs.
The official answer from SPSS is to use .Net or to use their implementation with Python in their new version 14.0. But this is obviously not an option when you want to use only Java.
Does anybody have experience with SPSS and JDBC-ODBC??? I have tried the possible ResultSet Types, which I took from:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v8/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.db2.udb.doc/ad/rjvdsprp.htm
and none of them worked.
Thank you in advance for your ideas and input & stay happy!
Here the code without all the rest of the class arround it:
// Module: SimpleSelect.java
// Description: Test program for ODBC API interface. This java application
// will connect to a JDBC driver, issue a select statement
// and display all result columns and rows
// Product: JDBC to ODBC Bridge
// Author: Karl Moss
// Date: February, 1996
// Copyright: 1990-1996 INTERSOLV, Inc.
// This software contains confidential and proprietary
// information of INTERSOLV, Inc.
public static void main1() {
String url   = "jdbc:odbc:SomeSystemDNS";
String query = "SELECT SomeSPSSColumn FROM 'SomeSPSSFileName'";
try {
    // Load the jdbc-odbc bridge driver
    Class.forName ("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
    DriverManager.setLogStream(System.out);
    // Attempt to connect to a driver. Each one
    // of the registered drivers will be loaded until
    // one is found that can process this URL
    Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection (url);
    // If we were unable to connect, an exception
    // would have been thrown. So, if we get here,
    // we are successfully connected to the URL
    // Check for, and display and warnings generated
    // by the connect.
    checkForWarning (con.getWarnings ());
    // Get the DatabaseMetaData object and display
    // some information about the connection
    DatabaseMetaData dma = con.getMetaData ();
    System.out.println("\nConnected to " + dma.getURL());
    System.out.println("Driver       " +
      dma.getDriverName());
    System.out.println("Version      " +
      dma.getDriverVersion());
    System.out.println("");
    // Create a Statement object so we can submit
    // SQL statements to the driver
    Statement stmt = con.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY ,ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
    // Submit a query, creating a ResultSet object
    ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery (query);
    // Display all columns and rows from the result set
    dispResultSet (rs);
    // Close the result set
    rs.close();
    // Close the statement
    stmt.close();
    // Close the connection
    con.close();
}

Thank you for your reply StuDerby!
Actually the above script was before, as you suggested, leaving the ResultSetTeype default. This did not work...
I am getting gray hair with SPSS - in terms of connectivity and "integratebility" none of their solutions offered is sufficient from my point of view.
Variable definitions can only be read by the slow API, data can only be read by Python or Microsoft Products... and if you want to combine both you are in big trouble. I can only assume that this is a company strategy to sell their Dimensions Platform to companies versus having companies developping their applications according to business needs.
Thanks again for any furthur suggestions and I hope, that some SPSS Developper will see this post!
Cheers!!

Newbie: Problem with jdbc-odbc and MS SQL server 2005

I'm on win vistax64 with SQLSERVER 2005 and I have set up the odbc source as system dsn using the SQL Native Client driver with SQL authentication and the connectivity test in the end succeeds.
I'm trying to make a simple web app that will connect to the database and perform simple querries. It's a school assignment.
I'm using the jdbc-odbc bridge because it's the simplest way to do it and it's what we were shown in class.
I get the following irritating error:
"Cannot establish a connection to jdbc:odb:sstmdb using sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver ([Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specifies)".
I'm working with netbeans 5.5.1 and this error is what I get when in the runtime tab I try to connect with the jdbc-odbc. I get a similar error in the logs when I try to run the app on the j2ee server.
This is the java class that establishes the connection.
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.SQLException;
public class Connector {
    private static final String dbUrl="jdbc:odbc:sstmdb";
    private static final String user="kimon";
    private static final String password="jackohara";
    public static Connection getConnection(){
        Connection conn = null;
        try {
            Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
            conn = DriverManager.getConnection(dbUrl,user,password);
        } catch (SQLException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        return conn;
}It has worked perfectly on my school PC with winXP and MSDE2000.
What am I missing?

Ok, help came from an other way where I was inquiring about a different problem:
Connectivity works fine by using User DSN instead of System DSN for the ODBC source.

J2EE and JDBC-ODBC bridge driver

Hi all,
in my application I want to access an ODBC database to get the data and put it into cloudscape. In my resources.properties I added the jdbc driver
jdbcDriver.1.name=sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriverand also added a datasource
jdbcDataSource.5.name=jdbc/MyOdbc
jdbcDataSource.5.url=jdbc\:odbc\:odbc-nameAfter starting j2ee 1.3.1 the server reports following error:
Error in creating data source object: jdbc/MyOdbcWhat's going wrong? Thanks for your help.
-chris

additional information:
The phenomenon happens only if I use J2SDK 1.4.0. Running the 1.3.1 the driver is loaded without any problems.
Is it a security issue or am I not allowed to use 1.4 because it's too new?
-chris

Application Performance Issue

Hi !
We have developed a web application which was moved to staging around an year ago. Now the application is facing connection failures and session time outs. We inferred that it is 'coz of the increase in the size of database resluting in larger outputs causing the timeouts..There are hundreds of users accessing the application at a given time....and lakhs of recs in each table...around 60 tables in total
We are using weblogic server 5.1 and java,jsp,ODBC for the application development. We suggested that the connection pools size be increased and the time out value be increased as well....
But , we r also trying to check the frontend to see if it can be optimized in a better way....
My question is ..do u think that the usage of preparedstatement in place of statement object in jsp's and java files is going to make any difference....
Also, can u also suggest any other methods to follow to optimize the performance....
any suggestions are welcome..Thanks in advance

Prepared statements make a difference if you execute the same query over and over again. It means it doesn't have to parse the sql string each time, but can just plug in different parameters.
In your case though, I don't think it would make much of a difference. The time is being spent in running the query, not parsing it.
I would look at your database queries - maybe add an index to the table to speed things up?
What database are you using specifically? How are you connecting via ODBC? Using the JDBC-ODBC bridge? Maybe look at a pure JDBC driver?
The general rule is that 90% of the time is spent in 10% of the code. Its finding the 10% you need to optimize that is the problem. Run a profiler to see what is taking the time.
Good luck,
evnafets

Performance Issue in 8_1_7

After upgrading from 8.1.6 to 8.1.7 both database and JDBC drivers I am facing a significant performance issues in AQ. getQueue() method takes arounf 2 minutes in 8.1.7 whereas it was taking just 19 seconds in 8.1.6. Can someone throw light on this. Thanks !!

I got in this thread by searching for getQueue() performance topic. Producing stats for aq$_queues does work, and it improves performance by 50% when there are large number of queues. I think it can be further improved by looking into other tables used by getQueue(). Could you explain how's the sql statement issued by getQueue() look like ? The reason I'm asking this is based on the obersavtion we have after applying the stats of aq$_queues: Under one instance there are two users having queues, the 1st user has 4 queues, the 2nd users 400 queues; the getQueue() of 1st user is almost twice faster than that of the 2nd user.

JDBC odbc performance issue...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for