JFlashPlayer and multithread support

I'm currently working on a image generation task which will be handled by a SWF file. Since the end result should be highly multithreaded in nature ,I cannot invoke a browser, So I'm using JFlashPlayer.All I need is to create a JFrame with an SWF embedded.The embedded SWF will do my job and once its done , It will notify the container(JFrame) to dispose itself.
This will work perfectly fine in a single threaded environment,But if I create more than 5 threads ,the application will crash throwing system out of memory errors from the Flash player.
I can allocate more memory to JVM but I didn't find any useful method which can set more virtual memory to the embedded flash object.Also if my understanding is correct, even if i create 5 different instances of of JFrame in 5 different threads,only one SWF object will be created in the memory, and all the JFrames shares the common SWF object.
Any suggestions guys ?
Thanks

Do you want to play multi flash files from the JFrame i.e each flash files has its own JFlashPlayer
If you have bought this package then the best think is to get support from the vendor [email protected]
Regards,
Alan Mehio
London, UK

Similar Messages

Arch programs from repos and multithread support

Support of how many CPU cores/threads maintainers compile programs with? Programs which are available from Arch repositories.

Mr. Alex wrote:
graysky wrote:The programs don't have specific support AFAIK
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg
The MAKEFLAGS option can be used to specify additional options for make. Users with multi-core/multi-processor systems can specify the number of jobs to run simultaneously. Generally -j2, plus 1 for each additional core/processor is an adequate choice. Optimizing for multiple cores can sometimes increase compiling performance, shortening compile times. However, be warned that occasionally using anything but the default can cause compilation problems, though many have agreed that -j3 is fairly safe to use for the majority of packages.
This only affects how many threads that make will spawn. It's compile time only and won't change the behaviour of the resulting binary one bit.
A single threaded app will always be single threaded, even if your compile forked off 30 threads when it compiled it.
Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2010-12-20 16:16:00)

Question related to multithreaded support in X-Fi driv

Are there any plans for multithreaded support in X-Fi drivers?IF yes, when and for what OSes ?thanks for answers

This is a limitation of the card's hardware. No software driver will fix it.

Java multithreading support in Oracle JVM

Dear all,
I have some questions and observations regarding multithreading support in Oracle JVM. I have some java code that is stored in the database and is multithreaded (in separate threads I run a plsql procedure that does a lot of precessing). If I run the code with my standalone JVM it works like a charm, everything gets executed in separate threads. But if I store the code in the database and run it (with the custom JVM Oracle implemented for the server) it does not do any threading, all I have is a single thread that runs everything sequentially.
The logic is this: using JDBC I create a connection, get a parameter (number of threads) and then launch the threads (each thread creates its own connection and runs the plsql procedure). No resource is shared (I have no synchronized code, I do not yield).
My question is: does Oracle JVM supports multithreading or not? If yes, how to achieve it? Maybe there is something handled in JDBC? (although my code useses JDBC is not multithreaded) If this is not possible with java, do you now how to run something (oracle function, procedure) concurrently with PLSQL? (I tried with DBMS_JOBS but it does not work on all my databases and our DBAs discourage the use of them). Performing multithreading my launching different sqlPlus processes is not an option (as we have no security standard regarding the authentication -> connection is made by specifying in clear text the user and password).
I wanted to use java because is more simple, secure (the connection is already established as the classes are stored in the database) and easy to maintain (until now we use different scripts which run on Unix and Windows and this leads to double work).
The Oracle versions I use are 10g and 11g.
Thank you all very much for your time
Just the best,
Don

don wrote:
My question is: does Oracle JVM supports multithreading or not? If yes, how to achieve it? Maybe there is something handled in JDBC? (although my code useses JDBC is not multithreaded) If this is not possible with java, do you now how to run something (oracle function, procedure) concurrently with PLSQL? (I tried with DBMS_JOBS but it does not work on all my databases and our DBAs discourage the use of them). Performing multithreading my launching different sqlPlus processes is not an option (as we have no security standard regarding the authentication -> connection is made by specifying in clear text the user and password).
(Obviously the other post answers your question.)
If I am reading that correctly then you have a management issue - not a technological one.
You have a task to complete, presumably doing it efficiently is something that the company wants.
And you have two alternatives both of which the DBAs are not allowing you to use.
So at that point it is up to management to insist that the DBAs provide specific technological reasons (not hand waving) why those solutions are not suitable. And they should also be required to provide the outline of an alternative that is suitable.
Besides that you might consider why your solution cannot be implemented entirely in a single threaded PL/SQL routine. The fact that is harder is not a reason when the point of the excercise is to create something that is more efficient.

Problems with SEA and Multithread library

I've try to develop a multithread sub-agent. I've call the pthread_create in agent_init() function. The thread open an UDP socket and wait for messages from other processes.
The daemon and sub-agent with it's thread start correctly (apparently) but immediately after i receive the following error:
signals_init() failed: sigset(32, SIG_IGN) failed [errno: Invalid argument(22)]
and the sub-agent stops.
Is There some incompatibilty between SEA and multithread library?
Can you help me?
Thanks

Hi,
You are correct, there is a patch required for the multithreading support.
The bug number is 4224980 and the synopsis is Multi-threaded support needed for SEA subagents.
This bug fix has gone into 107709-07 (Sparc Solaris 7) and is already fixed in Solaris 8 FCS. Please download this patch and after that test your agent on Solaris 7.
This is assuming you have Solaris 7(Sparc) installed and that you are using the SEA donwload that is supported on Solaris 7. If you are on Solaris 8 and then you are using the Solaris 7 binaries then also you may run into this error. So ensure you are using freshly installed Solaris 8 if you are interested in Solaris 8 and not a mixed SEA env.
Hope the above information helps.
Thanks
Sujeet (Sun-DTS)

I am having difficulty: we are running a windows server 2003 - mail and outlook support 2007 and upwards, how do I get the brand new apple machines to work with the 2003 version of server

I am having difficulty: we are running a windows server 2003 - mail and outlook support 2007 and upwards, how do I get the brand new apple machines to work with the 2003 version of server

I may be way out, but do you know about this product, would it help integrate the Macs for you.
https://www.thursby.com/sites/default/files/images/ADmitMacv8_SPD.pdf

IMAC's Top graphics card frustration - Cheap and no support for Adobe Mercury Playpack Engine GPU Acceleration?

If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
Please, if you have a solution for me, let me know. Otherwise I find it pretty frustrating that I purchased a top-end iMAC, fully maxed-out in every way possible, and that the iMac doesn't support Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration. Also, an old USB 2.0 Hub and thus the built-in SD card reader is slow. If you have SD cards with 95MB/s Transfer, Read and Write speeds, the iMAC will only transfer at around 30MB/s if you're lucky. Technically 480Mbs which is around 50MB/s but I haven't seen those speeds.
I figured this could at least be circumvented with a Thunderbolt SD card reader or a Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 adapter but of course no such thing exists.
Well, nothing with a reasonable price tag. This all might seem trivial to some but when you're uploading 24 hours of HD video footage from a 128GB SDXC card, the speed makes a big difference.
And come on, no BluRay support? Ridiculous. I get the politics of why but still, just ridiculous. It would be nice to be able to burn a BluRay to watch in my home theater system. There are other methods but BluRay is convenient and great for backing up large Video Files. Unfortunately BluRay looks like it's not going to make it. Maybe cable distribution companies will increase their Internet upload speeds one day and I can just store everything in the cloud and watch full length movies(that I've created) on Vimeo.
Anyways, I went and took a look at the hardware Apple stuffed inside my fancy (3.4 Ghz i7, 16GB 1333 DDR3, 2GB AMD 6970M, 256 GB SSD Internal and 2TB 7200 Internal) machine and it appears to be pretty middle of the range stuff. It's an iMAC, not a Mac Pro so why am I griping? Because my 2009 PC(which I tricked out over the last two years) is faster and does support the Mercury Playback Engine. I spent $2100 total on this PC which includes all my upgrades. I spent around $3300 on the iMAC. I feel ripped off.
Yes, I do love my iMAC on multiple levels but had I known my dated 2009 PC would render video projects faster, I would have gone with a MAC Pro or just a new PC. It seems that Mac is moving completely away from making high-end computers for niche markets(video editing) and focusing on their tiny laptops, IPADS and IPhones for the masses. Obviously smart from a capitalistic perspective(at present at least) but very frustrating for some.
I was actually told to purchase a MAC for video editing. I've been a PC guy for 15 years. I went with the iMAC because I had read many good things about it(probably just Apple propaganda) and also the MAC PRO was to be discontinued. Also the MAC Pro would have been triple the cost for what didn't seem like a whole lot more.
It's one's thing to prepackage a computer with inferior hardware(the iMAC I have is fast for most things and more than enough for 99% of the population) but to not allow us to pop open the computer and make a quit upgrade to the machine is what really makes me feel like I'm using a computer built for Grannies. I mean there is a reason my mother loves iMacs and Iphones. Amazing that I was able to upgrade my memory from 4 to 16GB but I've heard Apple has even done away with that. I get why they do it. Apple Warranty, Apple Care issues, Profit and World Domination: Apple wants a monopoly on everything.
Was great to see Adobe bounce back after the whole Flash/HTML5 thing and knock Final Cut Pro off the face of the Earth for good. People are still buying it b/c of the brand name but Final Cut is done. David Fincher used Adobe's Workflow for everything when he made The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo. Hollywood is making the shift and the world will follow. The Adobe Workflow has finally come together and there is just no way Apple can compete with Adobe Creative Cloud and an Engine that can just swap from Premiere to After Effects to Prelude to SpeedGrade to Photoshop to Story with speed for $29 bucks a month(or $49 for some). Apple better start supporting Adobe's Mercury Engine or they may have a problem. And if you're using Final Cut X, you're severely handicapping yourself. Problem is that people don't want to take the time to learn Adobe's products(steep learning curve for sure) which is where Apple's Granny software, and perhaps computers, comes in to play. Arnold Schwarzenegger once said "Milk is for babies, Real Men Drink Beer". I'm beginning to think that "Mac's are for Grannies, Real Men Use Adobe and PCs".
The major problem with Apple is you're forced to use Apple. Not sure but history has proven that people don't like to be forced into anything. Autocracies don't work. These systems eventually topple, even in the corporate world.
Amazon.com, now that's the company to emulate. What an amazing machine!
I've read that Apple may even discontinue the iMAC after 2013. Who knows?
If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
1) Graphcis Card - AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB (6990 would have been better or something from NVIDIA.
2) USB 2.0 Hub with only 480 Mb/sec
3) Seagate Baracude SATA I 7200 RPM drive with 3GB/s transfer rate and only a 32 GB Cach. It's ok. I would have expected at least a Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB or the Velociraptor at 10,000RPM.
4)APPLE SSD TS256C Flash Drive. As you can see, it doesn't stack up so well against other SSD Drive.
Just average. http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.phphdd=APPLE+SSD+TS256C

Whining and ranting about how iMacs can't do this or iMacs/orMacs can't do that is not going to get you a lot of help here.
Your "I love my MAC" is typical of the ever ubiquitous PC whiner.
If your video work needs were that computer intensive and critical , you should've done some online research and you should have budgeted for a Mac Pro.
Mac Pros are completely expandable and upgradeable unlike the iMac.
Mac Pros have much more faster and more CPU cores than the iMac line.
iMac line is limited to CPUs with 8 cores. The Mac Pros, I believe, are up to 16 core CPUs, now.
The Mac Pros can have their GPU upgraded and you even add/expand to use specialty audio/video cards.
Mac Pros are the defacto standard for real video work.
iMacs, even the high end model, is not really designed to do really heavy and intensive video work.
iMacs do do video creation and editing. Just not on the level that is needed from a more "Pro" computer.
It seems to me you are asking your iMac to do more than it was originally designed for, in terms of professional video editing.
You get a lot more out of a Mac Pro than an iMac for any real serious video, CGI or animation work.
You just didn't want to spend that much cash on one.
iMacs are not user upgradeable or friendly to user upgrades at all!!!
If you purchased a Mac Pro, you could've had that better, faster HD, better faster SSDs.
That said, I can offer no real help to but because of the nature of your post and the fact you just simply annoyed me, I feel some advice and explanations are in order
First off, you picked Adobe video editing software suite as your video creation software on the Mac. It's no secret to long-time video content creators on the Mac that Adobe products, especially those for video creation and editing are very user unfriendly on the Mac. Even though Macs are supported from Adobe, Adobe for a long time has treated the Mac and Mac users as second class citizens.
Before purchasing and installing Adobe Premiere, did you even check Adobe's site for the preferred system hardware and software requirements? Hmmm?
This is why you should KNOW what software you are going to be running on a computer first then research what computer make and model will run said software.
That's why Apple has its own apps like Aoerture, Logic and Final Cut.
Despite your ignorance in this matter, Final Cut Pro X is alive and doing well, thank you, and using this software on your iMac would kick Adobe Premier in the you know whats.
Final Cut Pro X is a complete video solution for and completely designed around the Mac.
Why are you using USB 2.0 connections for video work when you have a perfectly good FireWire 800 connection.
In case you are not aware, FireWire 800 is called so because it has a max throughput of 800 Mbps.
Your 2011 iMac can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. Not just 16 GBs.
This changed when the 2010 model iMacs came out.
Blu-ray? I believe you can buy external Blu-ray writers that work with Mac using said FW800 connection.
So you cite one movie and one videographer using Adobe Premier for your premise that Final Cut is dead in Hollywood?
Your argument that Apple locks you into everything in their world can be countered by saying Windows and Windows PCs lock you into the Windows world. What's your point?
Apple is not discontinuing their computers platforms any time soon.
All you are regurgitating is rumor. Probably from all of the PC crowd.
iMacs and professional desktop Macs are not going anywhere.
Currently, Apple is the only desktop/laptop computer maker that is still making a profit on their Macs and increasing their market share percentages for the last 5 years during which the PC market has continually slumped/dropped in its market share.

Mp3 and j2me supporting reliance mobile

hi,
if anyone know abt mp3 and j2me supporting Reliance phone in market.if so please give me the link where to get teh details I already checking it with reliance website and i want more information please help me.
thanx in advance
laxmi

hi laxmi
i dont know did you check this URL
www.dadp.com
there is one forum also avail for the j2me and realience phone you will get all the information tehre
regards
[email protected]

Windows Vista 64 Bit and Button Support - Qosmio G30?

Windows Vista 64 Bit and Button Support?

Everybody claiming that Vista x64 (or Ultimate) can't be used with FN keys or Flash Cards is utterly wrong!
I have a Qosmio G30 running Vista x64 Ultimate, and have both FN keys, Toshiba Flash Cards and (partly) the hardware buttons at the top working.
After a lot of research, I found that Toshiba has released a 64-bit version of VAP called util_tvap_27581D. If you google it, you might discover it...

IPAD MINI RETINA SCREEN VERSION IOS 7.1.2 can't success download apps , need to reboot every times only can download apps. Is iOS problem or hardware issue.? Local agent switch sale and tech support can't fix my problem.

I Purchase iPad mini retina screen on July 7 2014 at Malaysia local apple sale agent switch store somehow now my iPad did restore to latest iOS 7.1.2, before that and after also facing 1new issue is my iPad mini cant success download apps and error message show can't download at this time, either retry or click done. My internet is good condition no line down, I reboot my iPad only can download but sometime can't need to reboot twice only can download. Very sad local sale and tech support can't help to solve my problem...

Reset the device:
Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button together for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
If that doesn't help, tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset All Settings
If that doesn't help, tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings
You will have to re enter your Wi-Fi password.
No data is lost due to a reset.
If nothing above helped, try here > iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections

MacBook Crash and Apple Support

Not sure if anyone else has had this experience. First, I am a brand new Mac user. Bought the new MacBook Pro i7 with 8GB of RAM as a switch from my PC laptops.
Any other big crashes out there? Just wondering if there is a systemic hardware issue?
I had the new laptop for a total of 4 days before it crashed hard. on the first full day of use, it started crashing with the veil of grey and the message that a serious error had occurred and I needed to hold down the power button to restart. It crashed a total of 6 times in 4 days (2 days of real use) before I could get to the Genius Bar.
They stated that was obviously not normal and that I should request a new unit from AppleCare, which I did as an advanced replacement. I was hoping to keep my crashing laptop just to get more used to the Mac. However, after the Genius Bar did an archive re-install, the computer immediately crashed twice while in the store.
We then attempted to do an Erase and Install, and the unit would not install the fresh load of Mac OS X. The Genius Bar rep said it definitely looked like a hardware issue since it would not re-install the software, so I had to send the unit back ahead of receiving a replacement.
As for customer service, there was absolutely no urgency to get a replacement laptop to me. It was a customized unit and it is finally due to arrive today, but it has taken 10 days since I ordered my advanced replacement.
I will tell you that this has been a very frustrating and disappointing start to my Mac usage. And customer support could have made that bad experience so much better, but their lack of action and mis-statements actually made it worse.
Sorry, I was hoping for a much better experience. I am still hoping that IF the second MacBook works I can see that I made the right decision.
LewieE

Hi A Brody,
Lemons do happen and while that was a disappointment, the Genius Bar guys did a great job. I will say my expectations were higher for Apple based on everything I heard trying to make my decision to swap from a PC.
The first customer service rep I spoke to when I setup the advanced replacement stated that this unit would be put at the head of the que as it was a replacement for defective unit. The second rep I spoke with said advanced replacements have the lowest priority and it should have been returned as a zero dollar replacement and by him changing it to that, especially since my return unit had been received, would cause it to jump to the head of the shipments. The third person I spoke to said it just had to be processed in the normal 5-7 day shipping replacement and there was nothing they could do.
When a customer has a problem, customer service can make or break that experience. In fact, customers that have had a problem and had a positive resolution to that problem are shown to be more loyal than customers that have never had a problem at all.
Regards,
LewieE

You have to love HP products and their customer service and technical support

My daughter has one of your ZV5000 notebooks. She has been very happy with it until the last few months when she started having charging issues. After investigation I found out that HP had a class action suit over this very problem. I called customer support and I emailed customer support trying to get HP to live up to it's obligation and fix it. I got no where and after several hours I gave up. She decided to get a new notebook. She bought a Compact Presario CQ50-130US from Staples. When she got it home she tried to connect to my wireless router and couldn't. We called technical support and spend the following 2 hours trying to get it to connect. I spoke to several techs none of which knew what they were talking about. They would read step by step from some try this if that doesn't work try this directions they must have. If that wasn't bad enough we constantly had to ask for it to be repeated because we couldn't understand them. They spoke English but with such heavy accents you couldn't understand what they were saying. The last tech was going to call Comcast my internet provider. I told him they provided the internet service not the router. He couldn't understand that. After keeping me on the phone for 15 minutes he came back to say he couldn't get threw and would call me back when he did. There customer service must be as good as yours is to get threw to. I got a call 24hrs later to ask if everything was alright. They never fixed the problem how could it be alright? By then she had decided to return the new one and buy a product other than HP or Compact. I would up fixing her old laptop something HP should have paid for but didn't. I have always trusted and respected the HP name. I am very sorry to see what it has become to stand for. Inferior products that you don't stand behind and customer and technical support that can't speak English and don't have a clue as to what they are doing. How sad! Do you think any of my family or friends will be buying an HP product?

well, this IS a means of finding a resolution for some issues. so why SHOULDNT they read this forum? i can assure you that there are people who are not just reading stuff off a book or a document. in fact, that is the biggest cliche's that exists today.
Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer with \'Accept as Solution\' if it solves your problem.
Click on the BLUE KUDOS button on the left to say "Thanks"
I am an ex-HP Employee.

Migration and SAP Support for BW 3.1

Hi,
I have couple of queries regarding Migration and SAP Support.
What is the required patch level that need to be mantained in BW 3.1 for a direct upgrade to BI 7.
I would like to know whether SAP still supports BW 3.1. I searched in SAP Service marketplace, but didn't get much information regarding this.
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Regards,
Hari

Hello,
BW Upgrade from 3.x to 7.0
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/e62b9990-0201-0010-42a7-ddcf5c93cafd
Hope it will help you.
Regards,

Problem with installing Photoshop elements 9 and adobe support advisor

Hi, I've received a graphic tablet with 2 programs: the first has been downloaded and works perfectly while the second, PSE9, has been giving me problems for at least a week!
I downloaded it and now I have a winzip file full of strange things (one of this is set up exe which tells me that I have to install adobe support advisor) and two files which said 3DF.tmp and PSEP9(1).zip.download and if I try to click them they tell me that I have to find on the Net the program to open them because I can't. And I don't know which program is required.
I tried a lot of times to download the adobe support advisor, I have enough space on my disc and my farewall is deactivated, but when the program begins I saw this annoyant message
cpsid_82829s5 Missing installation file bootstrapper error occured
with this code for a support from adobe 00-67325-032018052012
I unistalled it and retried, but nothing.
Please, I just want to use my tablet with the programs which are comprised in the package, why it's so difficult to download this damn photoshop elements 9????????????
Thank you

In the error message it doesn't tell me
"Installer has detected that a machine restart is pending. It is recommended that you quit the installer, restart try again,"
neither "Installer failed to initialize. File not found. Please download Adobe Support Advisor to detect the problem."
and I have enough space and I have Windows xp then I should be able to install it. I tried to unistall and install again the support advisor but nothing. I'm desperate.
Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 18/05/2012 22.20
A: "Questionlady"<[email protected]>
Ogg: Problem with installing Photoshop elements 9 and adobe support advisor
Re: Problem with installing Photoshop elements 9 and adobe support advisor created by Jeff A Wright in Trial Download & Install FAQ - View the full discussion
Did you try the steps listed in http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/troubleshoot-error-messages-b ootstrapper-cs5.html which was identified by the Adobe Support Advisor? If so can you please list each step and the result of those steps. This will allow us to best advise you on your next steps.
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4420419#4420419
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4420419#4420419. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Trial Download & Install FAQ by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Payment withheld and customer support unable to help

My payment for about $4,000 was withheld this month because of an outstanding $30 app ad campaign balance.
The balance exists because my bank issued me a new credit card, replacing my old credit card on file. Ok, fine, I assumed I can pay the balance and have my payment issued, right? Wrong, the problem is that there is no way to pay the balance. I was finally
able to add my new card as a payment option but even adding the new card as a payment option does nothing; the ad campaign remains unpaid and no payment can be issued.
I've created support tickets and customer support has been unable to resolve this issue, with no end in sight. What few responses I've received from customer support all read the same way: "we are investigating the issue but have no updates for you
at this time". Meanwhile I fully expect my next month's payment to be withheld as well, because the outstanding balance is still there.
Has this happened to anybody else? If so were you able to resolve this? I find it hard to believe I'm the only one who has an outstanding balance for an app ad campaign.
I am half-hoping that somebody higher up reads this who has the authority or resources to help with this. I'm amazed there is no solution for this after weeks. I am simply out of options, I have no idea what can be done about this.

Hello Nate,
You might not be able to create a new campaign in the payment failed state, but you can go to campaign creation page, add a new credit card and select the same. This will change the credit card associated with your account. If the card is good for swipe,
the account will be unblocked during the next monthly swipe cycle.
Please do so before the end of this month, so that your accounts get unblocked before the next payout cycle which is usually in the first week of every month.
If you have other feedback, please do let us know at
[email protected]
Thanks,
Vikram

JFlashPlayer and multithread support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for