[JHS 10.1.2] Table layout not warning for losing changes

I have a table layout in which I can change data.
When I change data but don't commit (or in case of end-users forget) and navigate to the next 10 records in the table I get no warning that I will loose my changes.
I guess this is fixed in production version? Could you please confirm this.
Regards,
Marcel

Marcel,
The JHeadstart 10.1.2 release notes of the latest 10.1.2 build mention a JDeveloper bug 4509014. Can you check if this explains your problem?
Does your page include file upload? If not, then you can avoid this bug by setting formSubmitted=true on the table. The latest build of JHeadstart 10.1.2 already generates this correctly.
kind regards,
Sandra Muller
JHeadstart Team
Oracle Consulting

Similar Messages

Table does not exist for the sys user

Hey Everyone,
I am having a strange problem with 10G 10.2. I keep getting the table does not exist for all the tables when I am logged in as sys. It is strange because I can query the same tables being logged in as a regular user say 'scott'. I can't figure out what the problem is since it could not be privileges because the user is sys. Is there something I am missing here. Any advice would be welcome.
Thanks,
Sarang

Yeah i am using the query....
SELECT * FORM SCOTT.EMP
It is a little wierd. I did a full database restore yesterday night. I dont know if that has anything to do with this. Will have to take a look at the logs.

All rows in table do not qualify for specified partition

SQL> Alter Table ABC
2 Exchange Partition P1 With Table XYZ;
Table altered.
SQL> Alter Table ABC
2 Exchange Partition P2 With Table XYZ;
Exchange Partition P2 With Table XYZ
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-14099: all rows in table do not qualify for specified partition
The exchange partition works correct for the first time. However if we try to exchange 2nd partition it gives the error.
How do i solve this error?
How do i find rows which are not qualified for the specified portion. is there a query to find out the same?

stephen.b.fernandes wrote:
Is there another way?First of all, exchange is physical operation. It is not possible to append exchanged data. So solution would be to create archive table as partitioned and use non-partitioned intermediate table for exchange:
SQL> create table FLX_TIME1
2 (
3 ACCOUNT_CODE VARCHAR2(50) not null,
4 POSTING_DATE DATE not null
5 ) partition by range(POSTING_DATE) INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))
6 ( partition day0 values less than (TO_DATE('01-12-2012', 'DD-MM-YYYY') ) )
7 /
Table created.
SQL> create index FLX_TIME1_N1 on FLX_TIME1 (POSTING_DATE)
2 /
Index created.
SQL> create table FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE
2 (
3 ACCOUNT_CODE VARCHAR2(50) not null,
4 POSTING_DATE DATE not null
5 ) partition by range(POSTING_DATE) INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))
6 ( partition day0 values less than (TO_DATE('01-12-2012', 'DD-MM-YYYY') ) )
7 /
Table created.
SQL> create table FLX_TIME2
2 (
3 ACCOUNT_CODE VARCHAR2(50) not null,
4 POSTING_DATE DATE not null
5 )
6 /
Table created.
SQL> Declare
2 days Number;
3 Begin
4 FOR days IN 1..50
5 Loop
6 insert into FLX_TIME1 values (days,sysdate+days);
7 End Loop;
8 commit;
9 END;
10 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set linesize 132
SQL> select partition_name,high_value from user_tab_partitions where table_name='FLX_TIME1';
PARTITION_NAME                 HIGH_VALUE
DAY0                           TO_DATE(' 2012-12-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')
SYS_P119                       TO_DATE(' 2013-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')
SYS_P120                       TO_DATE(' 2013-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')
Now we need to echange partition SYS_P119 to FLX_TIME2 and then echange FLX_TIME2 into FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE:
To exchange it with FLX_TIME2:
SQL> truncate table FLX_TIME2;
Table truncated.
SQL> alter table FLX_TIME1 exchange partition SYS_P119 with table FLX_TIME2;
Table altered.To exchange FLX_TIME2 with FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE we need to create corresponding partition in FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE. To do than we use LOCK TABLE PARTITION FOR syntax supplying proper date value HIGH_VALUE - 1 (partition partitioning column is less than HIGH_VALUE so we subtract 1) and then use ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION FOR syntax:
SQL> lock table FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE
2    partition for(TO_DATE(' 2013-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN') - 1)
3    in share mode;
Table(s) Locked.
SQL> alter table FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE exchange partition
2    for(TO_DATE(' 2013-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN') - 1)
3    with table FLX_TIME2;
Table altered.
SQL> Same way we exchange partition SYS_P120:
SQL> truncate table FLX_TIME2;
Table truncated.
SQL> alter table FLX_TIME1 exchange partition SYS_P120 with table FLX_TIME2;
Table altered.
SQL> lock table FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE
2    partition for(TO_DATE(' 2013-01-02 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN') - 1)
3    in share mode;
Table(s) Locked.
SQL> alter table FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE exchange partition
2    for(TO_DATE(' 2013-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN') - 1)
3    with table FLX_TIME2;
Table altered.
SQL> Now:
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1 partition(day0)
3 /
COUNT(*)
         8
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1 partition(sys_p119)
3 /
COUNT(*)
         0
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1 partition(sys_p120)
3 /
COUNT(*)
         0
SQL> select partition_name from user_tab_partitions where table_name='FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE';
PARTITION_NAME
DAY0
SYS_P121
SYS_P122
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE partition(day0)
3 /
COUNT(*)
         0
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE partition(sys_p121)
3 /
COUNT(*)
        31
SQL> select count(*)
2    from FLX_TIME1_ARCHIVE partition(sys_p122)
3 /
COUNT(*)
        11
SQL> SY.

2013 Custom Web Parts in Page Layouts not showing for users

Custom Web Parts in Page Layouts not showing for users
I have created a master page in the root site collection for a subsite I am developing. I created content types and custom page layouts for the pages within the subsite.
I used the snippet tool in the design manager to create web parts and page field markup which I copied into the custom layout HTML pages in the root site collection. For instance I have an image viewer web part that I place there to serve as a section title.
The problem is that I can see all these customer layout page parts no problem but my users cannot. This leads me to believe its permissions, I am site owner of both the subsite and root site collection.
The users that cannot see the web parts are site members of the site and restricted read users on the root site collection (where the layouts are stored).
What gives I'm finding it hard to understand why a snipet generated web part wouldn't show in all pages created from that layout page.
Any help would be appreciated, Havent found anything on this issue online. weird.

It is a permission issue indeed. Fix is simple, make sure you check out the page layout page, then check it back in as published version.
John Architect

Table type not defined for table control "T_CONTROL" (Custom table)

Hi All,
I m facing a problem in ITS mobile service.
The Table control designed by me in R/3 (Module pool program) is
not getting displayed in ITS mobile page.
It is giving me an error "Table type not defined for table control "T_CONTROL" (Custom table) ".
Can you please let me how this issue can be resolved.
With Regards,
Mahesh

CONTROLS: table_ctr TYPE TABLEVIEW USING SCREEN '0010'.
try using this....
Regards
Vasu

System shud not allow for batch change after bacth determiantion.

Dear ALL,
I have one Isuue at my client , there requiremtn is -
"Performing the process it was detected that the raw material and packaging material batches could be changed after the process order created, which allows to picking a batch instead FEFO. "
Is there any way that system not allow for any change related to batch and its qunitity.
Awaiting for fevorable respoce.
Regards,
Prerna Verma

Hi Prerena,
Activating Check Batch Tab in COR4 will performs an additional check in order itself.This check works after completing Batch Determination.For example during Batch Determination system has selected (as per your sort rule) Batch X for issue.But later User tries to change this Batch No. to Batch Y(by overwriting the batch no. in Batch field).But if you have activated this Check Batch function then system will perform the check immediately whether this new Batch complies the Batch Determination rule or not.And if found wrong then gives you an error or warning msg(depends oin your msg control).
my second point is regarding Transaction code COB1 to deactivate the Allow change function.See if you activate the this tab then you finds that qty fields editable during Batch determination.So you can change the qty. manually during batch detemination.
So in your case 2 level checks required.
1) During Batch Determination (COB1) - Deactivate Allow change
2) After Batch Determination(COR4) - Activate Check Batch
Regards,
Dhaval
Edited by: Dhaval on Sep 27, 2010 8:43 PM

Table can not activate again after changing

Hi, everybody
For some reason that we create one more field call EKORG(Purchasing organisation) in table LFA1 and made choice for both Key and Initial value. Now, we are going to delete this field and activate table again, system show the following message, please kindly give us a hand and let me know how to solve this issue in more detail. We use T-code: se14 and try to Activate and adjust database that system show the same message as below.
Thanks you All.
<b>Primary key change not permitted for value table LFA1
Message no. AD300
Diagnosis
This table is defined as a check table. For reasons of consistency, changes to the primary key of the table are not allowed.
Procedure
If it is essential that you change the primary key, you must delete the relevant foreign keys. Refer to the where-used list to find all tables containing a field that is checked against this table. Delete the foreign keys for these fields.
If necessary, maintain the deleted foreign keys again.</b>
Message was edited by:
Alfred

Alfred,
If you can't figure this out you should stop what you are doing and get help from someone who knows how to fix this mess. I'll give you a hint, it isn't Programs... And it might be something to do with tables... Once you've got a list of all tables where LFA1 is used you will have to check them 1 by 1 to see if they use LFA1 as a check table.
I'd still love to know what posessed you to mess around with the primary key of a standard SAP table? And I'd also love to know why everyone is giving you help and suggestions on how to activate the table whilst no-one seems to care that you are changing a standard SAP primary key. I can't believe you managed to get an access key to change the table in this way and no-one in your company/client questioned what and why you were doing it!
LFA1 is a pretty important table in the SAP system (Vendor Master table) so to mess around with its primary key is utterly ridiculous.
The only thing you should learn here is that changing SAP standard objects is usually a no-no. Trying to change the primary key on a standard SAP table is a complete no-no. There must have been an alternative to whatever it is you are trying to achieve.
Gareth.

Select All in a table does not work for Drag and Drop

Hi. I am using Jdeveloper 11.1.1.2 but have also reproduced in 11.1.1.3.
I am trying to implement drag and drop rows from one table to another. Everything works fine except when I do a Select All (ctrl-A) in a table, the table visually looks like all rows are selected, but when I try to click on one of the selected rows to drag to the other table, only the row I click on is dragged.
I tried setting Range Size -1, fetch mode to FETCH_ALL, content delivery to "immediate" but nothing works.
I even have reproduced not using a view object but just a List of beans with only 5 or 10 beans showing in the table.
Does anyone know how to get Select All to work for a Drag Source?
Thanks.
-Ed

Frank-
OK, thanks for looking into that. I also submitted this service request, which includes a simple sample app to demonstrate the problem:
SR #3-2387481211: ADF Drag and Drop does not work for rows in table using Select All
Thanks again for the reply.
-Ed

Deatail Region in OAF Table - Show not responding for first time click

I have added a detail region to my OAF results table. A link for 'show' appears for each record of my results table. When I click Show for a purticular record - the page refreshes, The control is going to Process Form Request but nothing is happening.
If I click the 'Show' for the second time for a purticular record ,Show functionality works and I could see my detail section under that record and the Hide functionality works fine too. Please advise if that is how it is suppose to behave or if we can change any property of the table to make it work for the firest time.
Thanks, Pradeep

Pathi,
Please try to have the WhereClause in the VO query as part of static definition itself. So you would only need to bind the parameter and execute the Query.
Try and let me know if that helped.
Thanks
Sumit

Purchasing Info record screen layout not working for ME11

Dear All Experts,
I got requirement where GR Based IV and GR should be required for one vendor. So htought to create PIR from where I can make these two fields DEFAULT. So I went to table T162 from where I can make these two fields mandatory for ME11.
I followed the path : SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Prcahsing Info Record - Define Screen Layout for making fields mandatory for ME11.
It is not working at all, as well I can see rest irrelevant fields which are not of my use are required. Have I missed any piece of configuration somewhere in MM ?
Experts guidance from forum will be very much appreciable.
Regards,
Revati Joshi.

HI,
as you know we can create purchasing info record manually as well as automatic at time of Po creation
If you mark it in ME11 manually it will be helpful to you
or you can mark its required field in Vendor master record as well for your vendor account group in following path.
Logistic general - Bunisess partner -vendors > control > define accont groups and field selection > select your account goups and click on details and double click on purchase data and check for "GR based invoice verification" and mark required field
Regards
kailas ugale

Can you help with Tcode to fill this SETUP table? not working for me.

Hi,
For the datasource 2LIS_11_VASCL (SD Sales: Schedule Line Item), I need to fill the Setup Tables via OLI*BW
I understand the * to be the application number, which in this case it is 11 but I get a message that OLI11BW does not exist.
1. Can you help me with the tcode to fill the setup table for 2LIS_11_VASCL?
2. Since there are several datasources with the same application number 11, how do I fill only 2LIS_11_VASCL without filling the others:
2LIS_11_VAHDR                     Sales Document Header Data
2LIS_11_VAITM                     Sales Document Item Data
2LIS_11_VAKON                     Sales Document Condition
2LIS_11_VASCL                     Sales Document Schedule Line
2LIS_11_VASTH                     Sales Document Header Status
2LIS_11_VASTI                     Sales Document Item Status
2LIS_11_V_ITM                     Sales-Shipping Allocation Item Data
2LIS_11_V_SCL                     Sales-Shipping Allocation Schedule Line
2LIS_11_V_SSL                     Sales Document Order Delivery
Thanks

Ok,
I tried that and it basically bring you to OLI7BW as suggested above.
1. At this point, how do you know which of these it is actually filling:
2LIS_11_VAHDR Sales Document Header Data
2LIS_11_VAITM Sales Document Item Data
2LIS_11_VAKON Sales Document Condition
2LIS_11_VASCL Sales Document Schedule Line
2LIS_11_VASTH Sales Document Header Status
2LIS_11_VASTI Sales Document Item Status
2LIS_11_V_ITM Sales-Shipping Allocation Item Data
2LIS_11_V_SCL Sales-Shipping Allocation Schedule Line
2LIS_11_V_SSL Sales Document Order Delivery
2. Also, what does it mean when after running OLI7BW wide, with no restriction on my system, still rsa3 shows no records for 2LIS_11_V_SCL?
Any other way to confirm that there may not be any data in 2LIS_11_V_SCL?
Or any way, to make an entry which reflect in 2LIS_11_V_SCL so that I can verify if OLI7BW actually fills the setup table?
Thanks

New entries in table TSTC not capturing in scu3 change logs

Hi ,
We have TSTC table log enabled.
New Entries which comes through transport in the table TSTC are not capturing in change logs.
We have created a new Z T-code and transported it to Quality and then to Production.
But in the change logs of the tbale TSTC it is not captured both in quality and Production.
In the table TSTC t-code is present.
But the change log for the table doesnot show any new entry created.
In development change log of TSTC, the change is present but in Quality and Production it is not present.
Development client : 400
Quality Client : 600
Production Client : 600
Can any one spill some beans on it...
Thanks & Regards
Kiran

You need to add "recclient = ALL" (or same client value as "rec/client" profile parameter in RZ10) to the transport profile as well in the STMS.
Search SAP notes and the forum here for "recclient" (without "/")
Cheers,
Julius

Initial filling of logistic table is not working for Volume Tracking

Hi,
I have set up the TSCA 12B scenario for volume tracking. When starting the initial filling of the logistic tables the system recognizes the composition correctly (log file is OK). However the result is that table CCRCT_EHS_COMP is not filled at all and the table CCRCT_EHS_COMP_REG is filled correctly. Has anyone experience what could be the reason that table CCRT_EHS_COMP is not filled?
Thanks,
Paul
I found the solution. There are 2 different version of determining the composition for TSCA 12B. I changed to the other one and the problem was solved.
Edited by: P. Hensgens on Feb 21, 2012 1:17 PM

Hi,
You have to debug the entire system behaviour , the approval process using the second approver.
As first step , please check the security level of the second approver. Restart of workflow is based on the security level of the approver.
you can find the parameter for security level in the personalization tab of the user .
there is one function module which determines wether the workflow should be restarted (or) not.
i do not remember the exact name of the function module.
1)start transaction se37
2)enter bbpwflrestart*.
3) system will return a number of function modules , of them one function module determines wether to restart the workflow (or) not.
Please check what does the above function module return for the user and the shopping cart , there will be one parameter 'restart' which triggers the start

Global Temporary table is Not working For Pdf Reports

Hi all
we are using oracle db-10g, developer suite-10g.
While generating the Report for the satisfying several conditions we are fetching the data into
Global temporary table
On commit preserve rows
from this temp tables excel is generated properly. but pdf is not generating can anybody exaplain why it is not generating and what to do for that
Thank you

query and view are not possible
here i am giving one of the requirement
my project is belongs to inventory project.
report should be generated on the different selection criteria like
1)user can select one or more product codes
2)for that product code one or more item codes can select
like this so many different selection are there more than 12 selections from different tables
For this each different selection product code into gtt_prod_cd and item_cd into gtt_item_cd. after that performed the query and in where clause we are comparing the values with gtt.
can you please suggest me what to do for PDF Reports

ADF Table sorting not working for newly inserted rows

Hi,
I am using Oracle Jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.2
I am trying to sort the table after inserting the mew rows using ADF Table UI sort option, But the newly inserted rows are not getting sorted.
The code i am using to add a row is:
        ComplianceLibraryAMImpl am = getDataControl();
        EmKeywordVOImpl rep = am.getEmKeywordVO1();
        NameValuePairs nvp = new NameValuePairs();
        nvp.setAttribute("KeywordName", keyword);
        Row row1 = rep.createAndInitRow(nvp);
        rep.insertRow(row1);After this addition we are doing ppr on the table and then trying to sort using sort icon in table.
But the newly added rows are not taking part in sort.
What am i missing?
Thanks,
Tripuresh

This is the expected behavior. Check bug 9109010 - newly added and unsaved rows don't participate in sorting as per design. Try saving the rows and then sorting.
Regards,
Aditya

[JHS 10.1.2] Table layout not warning for losing changes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for