JPF Resources not defined for Validator

Hi,
I am developing portlet using Java Page Flow. I saw this error, however it's still validating:
ERROR [ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'] (ValidatorForm.java:154) - Resources not defined for Validator
How can I fix it? Thanks

Hi Abhishek / Durgesh ,
Thank you for your valuable suggestions
We checked back for all points that you guys suggested
1:  I coudn't find planning method attribute at plan options >> main tab
2: Parent item is not a buy item and all the components are active.
3: For Components: WIP supply Type is not Phantom
4: Sourcing Tab for the parent Item is as expected (i.e. Source organization is populated with appropriate value)
5: Actually, We have re-tested a different scenario where Work Order was not created through custom program. We created a new sales order and ran collections+Plan. Still no Planned Orders for components

Similar Messages

  • Tax category DE 2 is not defined for country 1

    Hi to all,
    We are in retail project while changing the article master following data is coming automatically to tax data in general data DE Germany MWST Output Tax O Unbranded Other. When I save the article master, i am getting following error.
    Tax category  is not defined for country DE
    Message no. M3019
    Diagnosis
    The combination of values you have entered is not defined in the system.
    Procedure
    Check your entries, and choose a valid value or combination of values with F4.
    If you want the value(s) to be defined in the system, contact your systems administrator.
    Detail error E M3 019 : Tax category DE 2 is not defined for country 1
    Regards
    Govind

    Hi Anil,
    Allready it was maintained
    Regards
    Govind

  • V-41 tcode error :Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00

    Hi All,
    I am trying to create a BDC using the transaction V-41. 
    The first screen has fields:
    ConditionType and Table, where I have to fill values ZPM1 and 800 respectively.
    But as soon as I enter the tcode v-41 and say enter, the above mentioned fields are already having the  values 'PR00' and ' 304'. Normally if you take an example fo t-code VA02, all fields are blank.
    Then an error message  is displayed:
    Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
    This behaviour is not allowing me to use the BDC feature.
    Please advise me on why this is happening. What are the possible solutions I can use to clear these values programmatically?
    Can anything be done via customizing?
    Regards,
    Namita.

    Dear ILHAN ,
    Well the problem you are facing is having the following solution:
    Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
    Message no. VK024
    Diagnosis
    The selected condition type does not fit in the condition table, that is the basis for the condition record. Alternatively the selected condition type is not included in the condition types that were selected on the selection screen or that are defined in the variant of the standard selection report.
    Procedure
    Úse F4 help to choose a valid condition type.
    If this does not give you the required condition type, check in Customizing for condition types and the related access sequences.
    In the condition maintenance also check Customizing for the selection report (pricing report), that you have selected in the navigation tree, using the standard condition table as a reference.
    I hope this helps.
    It has worked for me.
    I gave it a try and what I am getting using the transaction V-41 is create Price condition (PR00) : Fast Entry.
    Please award points if you find it useful.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Customer Master Record :Sales area INSO IN IN is not defined for customer

    Hi Experts
    I got error , when creating Customer Master Record .The error message likes below
    "Sales area INSO IN IN is not defined for customers" .I maintained all the settings .But why i am getting again and again the same error .Even i checkd in TVTA table in SM30 but is shows clear data , please tell me where i made mistake .
    I traid so many times maintain with new configuration ,but still field .Please what i have to done to over coome this issue .
    Your Suggestions needful to me .. Please
    Issue Details :
    Message no. F2644
    Diagnosis
    The sales area specified has either not been defined (i.e. there is no entry in table TVTA) or it refers to another sales area for customers (customer division/customer distribution channel in the TVTA detail screen). This means that the customer master data of the sales area entered correspond to the data in the reference sales area and customer master data only needs to be maintained for this reference sales area.
    Procedure
    You can display the relevant and therefore valid sales areas for customers by selecting "Extras" -> "Sales areas" -> "All areas".
    Regards
    Rajesh .P

    Maintain relevant entries in t.code VOR1 and VOR2 and then try again. Here assign the distribution channels and divisions to reference distribution channel and division.

  • "Sales Area zzzz zz zz is not Defined for Customers"

    Hi All
             I am trying to create a customer using XD01. In my org structure there is only one sales org, one dist channle, one division and hence One Sales Area zzzz zz zz which I have set up in IMG. The Error I am getting is
    "Sales Area zzzz zz zz is not Defined for Customers"
    And Peformance Assistant gives the following message
    Message no. F2644
    Diagnosis
    The sales area specified has either not been defined (i.e. there is no entry in table TVTA) or it refers to another sales area for customers (customer division/customer distribution channel in the TVTA detail screen). This means that the customer master data of the sales area entered correspond to the data in the reference sales area and customer master data only needs to be maintained for this reference sales area.
    Procedure
    You can display the relevant and therefore valid sales areas for customers by selecting "Extras" -> "Sales areas" -> "All areas".
    I have already checked that
    1)My Sales area has been defined and Sales org is assigned to company code, Dist Channel and Division is assigned to Sales Org
    2)In Table TVTA my Sales Area Exist...
    3)I have tried creating my sales org by copying IDES sales org as well as creating a NEW sales org...however the error is still there
    Any Ideas???
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi!
       This error is coming due to assinment is not made for common Divisions. You can assign this by going to SPRO>S&D>Define common divisions. Here you assign sales org ZZZZ , division ZZ, division for conditions ZZ, division for Customers ZZ. Then try to create customer master for ZZZZ ZZ ZZ .
    This assignment for master data can be created in one sales area and that can be referenced to other sales areas also without creating again.Read the help below for details.
    Define Common Divisions
         In this step, you define the divisions that common master data should
         apply to. The definition is valid within each sales organization.
         Example
         You can determine, for example, that the conditions which are valid in
         division "01" also apply to divisions "05" and "06".
         Note
         The common master data across various divisions refer to the conditions
         and the customer master data.
         You thus minimize the effort of entering and managing master data.
         In addition, you can extrapolate your own statistics per division
         without having to create master data in the different organizational
         subareas.
         Action
         For the divisions, define from which other division the master data
         should be copied.

  • My app went from working fine to: Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPag when I restarted

    Hi everyone,
    I have a CF9 ORM problem that I haven't been able to figure out and thought I'd see if you had any idea. I have seen a few postings talking about a "similar" problem but none of them correctly resolved this particular issue. I appreciate any help you can offer.
    I recently created a CF9 app where I generated scripted ORM CFCs for my app using ColdFusion Builder. It worked great and my app was completely working. However, when I was adding some enhancements, I ran into an error when I restarted the CF app server. Here's the message I keep getting:
    "Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPage. Either the table should have a PK column mapped to a cfc field OR at least one field should be specified as id."
    My App.cfc file only had orm enabled (no other mappings) when it was working. I've since tried specifying things like the cfc location etc. and it still hasn't helped.
    // MORE DETAILS:
    - When my app was working, I had moved it to 2 other servers. I had this error on both of those but not on my local copy. They all use the exact same database.
    - The last change I made before the error was adding a generator="identity" field to my generated ORM beans. Once I got the message, I tried changing it back and restarting again but still got the error.
    - I've also made sure all of the Adobe tags are in my web root (as suggested in a prior posting about this problem). I've search all over for a solution and nobody has a solution posted online that works so far.
    Do you have any idea why this is happening?
    Thanks!
    Jeff

    Quick thought and probably not relevant, but do you have this.ormsettings.savemapping set to true in your Application.cfc? I've fallen foul of this before - once CF has generated the hbmxml files and saved them to disk you can make all kinds of changes to your code which won't make a difference as it'll continue to read from the file versions, but only for certain properties and methods at times it seems.
    Long shot I know, but I found CF ORM to be a nightmare for seemingly random caching.

  • Payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome

    The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
    For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
    methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
    no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
    The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
    however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
    Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
    FBZP.
    Best regards,
    Leonardo Vedovelli
    FI Support Engineer
    SAP Active Global Support

  • Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

    I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
    Message no. 8I402"
          I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
          This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
    Please help me in this issue , still No answer
    Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

    Dear sir
    For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
    Regards
    jrp

  • ERROR in MIRO : An exchange rate type is not defined for country IN

    Experts:
    When I try to enter the invoice received from the vendor, I am getting the following message.
    An exchange rate type is not defined for country IN
    Message no. FF802
    Can anyone provide me a solution for this?
    Thanks,
    Vijai

    This is the explanation given in note 974619 for the above error message
    Summary
    Symptom
    When you post an FI document, the system issues error message FF 801 or FF 802.
    Other terms
    Plants abroad, FF 801, FF802
    Reason and Prerequisites
    You use the 'Plants abroad' function.
    See Note 882132 for more information about this.
    Solution
    If the 'Plants abroad' function is active, additional fields appear when you maintain the country global parameters (transaction OY01, table T005):
    - Country currency       (Field WAERS)
    - Exchange rate type     (Field KURST)
    - Net discount base      (Field XSKFN)
    - Net tax base           (Field XMWSN)
    You must maintain the fields 'Country currency' and 'Exchange rate type'.
    Otherwise, the system issues error message FF 801 or FF 802.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO

    Dear Experts,
    when I click on 'Balance Choose' tab in J1IIN, it is showing an error message "Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO transaction and 60 excise group.Message no. 8I402" though I have maintain 'Excise account assignment table'  in "Tax on goods movement>India>account determination>specify G/L accounts per excise transaction". I searched in that forum, but I didnt get no proper solution.

    Hi
    Check your entries
    'Excise account assignment table' in "Tax on goods movement>India>account determination>specify G/L accounts per excise transaction
    EWPO          CR Credit     CLEAR CENVAT clearing account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
    EWPO          DR Debit     RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    regards
    Prashanth
    Edited by: Prashanth@SD on Apr 12, 2011 2:00 PM

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and 58 Excise group

    Hi Experts,
    When i am doing Goods receipts for Depot for Subcontracting
    i am getting this error message .Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and  Excise group. For Depot no modvat. is there any configuration setting for depot. Please do needful.

    Hi,
    Please maintain
    Hi,
    go to SPRO
    Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    SPROLogistics u2013 GeneralTax on Goods MovementsIndia Account Determination  Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Enter excise group -58
    ETT_ GRPO
    and G/L account
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group

    Dear Experts,
    Iam raising this question after checking all the contents related to Sub Transaction type in SDN.
    My prob is: for raw material sales scenario i have created order delivery and invoice. For Invoice i have done account determination with a different G/L in VKOA. Now i have to create an excise invoice and the accounting entry for central ED on sales should go to different G/L account. for account determination i have done the following settings:
    Maintained Sub transaction type in
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Basic Settings
    ->Maintain Sub Transaction types
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India ->
    Account determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    Here against DLFC sub transaction Type is maintained..
    Also
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Account determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Here maintained Excise group with DLFC Company Code subtransaction type, chart of accounts and all required GL Account .
    But when the iam creating Excise Invoice in J1IIN and clicking on Subtransaction type-F4, no entries are shown. No values found is the message in green. Message no. DH801
    If i use subtransaction type and enter billing document and enter, the following error message comes:
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Iam unable to understand why the subtransaction type maintained is not showing in TCODE J1IIN?
    Regards

    For the error message DH801, please check note 840911
    Excise modvat accounts not defined for
           DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Please check  your G/L assignments "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction"
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group

    Hi Guys,
    Suddenly we are facing issue during exicse invoice capturing with MIGO
    system is giving following error
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group
    Message no. 8I402
    While in Excise account assignment table CAPE is Linked to Modvat Clearing Account which is further liked to correct GL
    Can any one explain the cause of this issue Points will be awarded
    Regards,
    Ashish

    Hi
    Pls maintain the following:
    1. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Pls note the Sub Tansaction type is IP for ETT CAPE.
    ETT  <b>Sub Trn Type</b>   DC Ind                Account Name
    CAPE     IP           CR Credit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    CAPE       IP                   DR Debit             RG23ECS RG 23 ECS account
    2. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check the G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type CAPE and maintain the same G/L accounts for ETT CAPE with <b>Sub Trn Type IP</b>.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

  • Error - Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 exci

    Dear All,
    Getting below error while  doing J1IIN - Posting Excise invoice for Sale.
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 excise group"
    I checked with the settings GL are assigned to for DLFC and 01 excise group.
    Is anywhere else I need to mantain the modvat GL
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Check if you are using any subtransaction type along with excise transaction type.
    Excise group, ETT, company code, sub transaction type (if any), Chart of account, Modvat account (pls maintain all the entries over here) search for modavat clearing field and maintain it.
    BR
    Edited by: Sujoy on Jan 15, 2010 9:45 AM

  • VERSION 0 IS NOT DEFINED FOR FISACL YEAR 2007,

    i am learning SAP PP and i hv ides 4.7,
    now WHEN SAVING ORDER i.e DURING COST CALCULATION I GET A MESSAGE THAT VERSION 0 IS NOT DEFINED FOR FISACL YEAR 2007,
    ON ANALYSING IT LEADS TO T.CODE OKEV BUT HERE SYSTEM DOES NOT PERMIT TO CHANGE THE VERSION, BUT IN ECC 5.0 IT ALLOWS ,
    WHAT IS THE PROBLEM, CAN ANY ONE PL. HELP ME,
    analysis of error gives following message:
    Activation of the indicator is not permitted
    Message no. KT253
    Diagnosis
    You activated an indicator (Plan, Actual, WIP/results analysis or Variance calculation ) in the basic settings for version 1 in controlling area 1000. However, a higher order of settings (general version definition) prevents you from setting this indicator in version 1.
    Note
    The following should be taken into account when maintaining a version:
    In general version definition you decide whether a version is allowed for
    •     Panning (with the Plan indicator)
    •     Actual data update (with the Actual indicator)
    Note: In Overhead Cost Controlling, actual data is updated in operational version 0.
    Actual versions different from 0 are found at present only for delta versions in Activity Based Costing (CO-ABC), and when you work with parallel assesment ( additional versions):
    •     A data version from results and WIP determination manages (indicator WIP)
    •     Another version from variance determination manages (indicator Variance)
    •     A version for exclusive use (field exclusive application)
    You must maintain the version basic settings for each controlling area in which you want to update transaction data. General version definition restricts the settings possible for the controlling area:
    •     If general version definition does not allow plan and/or actual data update for version, this applies to the version in all controlling areas. If plan and/or actual data updating is allowed for a version in general definition, this can be reset for each controlling area separately (unmark the plan or actual indicator).
    •     Delta versions in ABC may not be used for parallel valuations in the actual; the same goes for versions with exclusive applications. In both cases, the valuation fields may not be maintained.
    To set indicators WIP/Results- or Variance-determination the following conditions apply:
    •     Both indicators may be set only during setup for the controlling area, when they are already established in the higher level general version definition
    •     If either indicator is already active in the data bank, then the actual indicator may not be subsequently activated
    •     If the actual indicator is inactive and either of these indicators is active, then the valuations in the corresponding versions and in version "000" must agree
    •     If the actual indicator is active, then both indicators must be activated
    Versions 0 and 1 are used regularly for various purposes by the system, which sets the following limitations/restrictions:
    •     Version 0 must always be available. It cannot be used exclusively. The plan and actual indicators must always be active.
    •     The actual indicator may not be activated in version 1.
    If these conditions are violated during version maintenance, error messages are issued. There are three types of error message:
    1. While maintaining the general version definition, you can only make changes if they do not violate the conditions outlined above.
    2. While maintaining the basic settings in the controlling area, the entries must remain consistent with the higher level entries.
    3. You want to maintain version 0 or 1. The restrictions outlined above apply.
    Use the "Extras" menu option to display the structure of the entries in the complex data object version:
    •     Select a version and choose Extras -> Version use.
    The SAP System shows which controlling areas use this version.
    •     Select Extras -> Versions in CO area
    This displays all versions used in the current controlling area.
    The subordinate entries in the hierarchy (settings for each fiscal year, strategic Activity-Based Costing: transactions for a delta versions) will also be shown for both cases.
    Procedure
    Do not activate the indicator, or change the higher order of settings in the general version definition.

    Raj,
    What are you trying to change?
    To me you are not suppose to make any changes, you need to select the version "0" and then hit "Settings for each Fiscal year" subfolder.... here you copy the settings of 2006 and change the year to 2007. This should resolve the problem.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

Maybe you are looking for