Jtable on JScrollPane get corrupted for large number of rows

Hi I have problem with vertical scroll bars of JScrollPane.
When move the scroll bar(faster) for a Jtable (with 2000 rows) the rows get
corupted.
Please let me know how can I fix this problem?

Hi,
I have just recompiled my (previously 1.3.1) application with 1.4.2 and notice the same problem. The problem starts somewhere between 1700 and 2500 rows.
Its not just the scroll bar for me - the display corrupts whereever i click the mouse on the table area.
Did you manage to diagnose??
Thanks, Dave

Similar Messages

Af:table Scroll bars not displayed in IE11 for large number of rows

Hi. I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.2.4.0.
The requirements of our application are to display a table potentially displaying very large numbers of rows (sometimes in excess 3 million). While the user does not need to scroll through this many rows, the QBE facility allows drill-down into specific information in the rowset. We moved up to JDeveloper 11.1.2.4.0 primarily so IE11 could be used instead of IE8 to overcome input latency in ADF forms.
However, it seems that IE11 does not enable the vertical or horizontal scroll bars for the af:table component when the table contains greater than (approx) 650,000 rows. This is not the case when the Chrome browser is used. Nor was this the case on IE8 previously (using JDev 11.1.2.1.0).
When the table is filtered using the QBE (to a subset < 650,000 rows), the scroll bars are displayed correctly.
In the code the af:table component is surrounded by an af:panelCollection component which is itself surrounded by an af:panelStretchLayout component.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this behaviour can be corrected? Is it purely a browser problem, or might there be a programmatic workaround in ADF?
Thanks for your help.

Thanks for your response. That's no longer an option for us though...
Some further investigation into the generated HTML has yielded the following information...
The missing scroll bars appear to be as a consequence of the setting of a style for the horizontal and vertical scroll bars (referenced as vscroller and hscroller in the HTML). The height of the scrollbar appears to be computed by multiplying the estimated number of rows in the iterator on which the table is based by 16 to give a scrollbar size proportional to the amount of data in the table, although it is not obvious why that should be done for the horizontal scroller. If this number is greater than or equal to 10737424 pixels then the scroll bars do not display in IE11.
It would seem better to be setting this height to a sensible limiting number of pixels for a large number of rows?
Alternatively, is it possible to find where this calculation is taking place and override its behaviour?
Thanks.

How to change Org Unit for larg number of emplyees

Dear Guru's,
My client has uploaded wrong Org Units while hiring, now that has to be changed for larg number of employees.
Can any one suggest me how can we do this for larg number of employees?
Thanks in advance for your kind suggestions.
Regards,
Srinivas

Hello Srinivas;
By saying uploaded wrong organizational units, do you mean that organizational structure in PPOME is wrong or employee - position assignment is wrong?
If employee - position assignment is wrong then I suggest you to use batch input program or use LSMW as you have to change it via personnel action - PA40
If organizational structure is wrong, then do you have correct organizational structure in another system like test or qa?
If you have correct organizational structure then you can directly transport it from one system to other but if you don't then you first need to correct the organizational structure and then run LSMW or batch input.
Regards;
Okan

Trying to install Lightroom CC on second computer ( I have monthly paid account for CC)- when launching get asked for serial number - what do I do next?

Trying to install Lightroom CC on second computer ( I have monthly paid account for CC)- when launching get asked for serial number - what do I do next?

Ask for serial number http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/ccm-prompt-serial-number.html

Oracle Error 01034 After attempting to delete a large number of rows

I sent the command to delete a large number of rows from a table in an oracle database (Oracle 10G / Solaris). The database files are located at /dbo partition. Before the command the disk space utilization was at 84% and now it is at 100%.
SQL Command I ran:
delete from oss_cell_main where time < '30 jul 2009'
If I try to connect to the database now I get the following error:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
df -h returns the following:
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d6 4.9G 5.0M 4.9G 1% /db_arch
/dev/md/dsk/d7 20G 11G 8.1G 59% /db_dump
/dev/md/dsk/d8 42G 42G 0K 100% /dbo
I tried to get the space back by deleting all the data in the table oss_cell_main :
drop table oss_cell_main purge
But no change in df output.
I have tried solving it myself but could not find sufficient directed information. Even pointing me to the right documentation will be higly appreciated. I have already looking at the following:
du -h :
du -h8K ./lost+found
1008M ./system/69333
1008M ./system
10G ./rollback/69333
10G ./rollback
27G ./data/69333
27G ./data
1K ./inx/69333
2K ./inx
3.8G ./tmp/69333
3.8G ./tmp
150M ./redo/69333
150M ./redo
42G .
I think its the rollback folder that has increased in size immensely.
SQL> show parameter undo
NAME TYPE VALUE
undo_management string AUTO
undo_retention integer 10800
undo_tablespace string UNDOTBS1
select * from dba_tablespaces where tablespace_name = 'UNDOTBS1'
TABLESPACE_NAME BLOCK_SIZE INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MIN_EXTENTS
MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE MIN_EXTLEN STATUS CONTENTS LOGGING FOR EXTENT_MAN
ALLOCATIO PLU SEGMEN DEF_TAB_ RETENTION BIG
UNDOTBS1 8192 65536 1
2147483645 65536 ONLINE UNDO LOGGING NO LOCAL
SYSTEM NO MANUAL DISABLED NOGUARANTEE NO
Note: I can reconnect to the database for short periods of time by restarting the database. After some restarts it does connect but for a few minutes only but not long enough to run exp.

Check the alert log for errors.
Select file_name, bytes from dba_data_files order by bytes;
Try to shrink some datafiles to get space back.

JDev: af:table with a large number of rows

Hi
We are developing with JDeveloper 11.1.2.1. We have a VO that returns > 2.000.000 of rows and that we display in a af:table with access mode 'scrollable' (the default) and 'in Batches of' 101. The user can select one row and do CRUD operations in the VO with popups. The application works fine but I read that scroll very large number of rows is not a good idea because can cause OutOfMemory exception if the user uses the scroll bar many times. I have tried with access mode in 'Range Paging' but the application works in strange ways. Sometimes when I select a row to edit, if the selected row is the number 430 in the popup is show it the number 512 and when I want to insert a new row throws this exception:
oracle.jbo.InvalidOperException: JBO-25053: No se puede navegar con filas no enviadas en RangePaging RowSet.
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.get(QueryCollection.java:2132)
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.fetchRangeAt(QueryCollection.java:5430)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.scrollRange(ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.java:1329)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.setRangeStartWithRefresh(ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.java:2730)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.setRangeStart(ViewRowSetIteratorImpl.java:2715)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewRowSetImpl.setRangeStart(ViewRowSetImpl.java:3015)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.setRangeStart(ViewObjectImpl.java:10678)
     at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCIteratorBinding.setRangeStart(DCIteratorBinding.java:3552)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.RowDataManager._bringInToRange(RowDataManager.java:101)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.RowDataManager.setRowIndex(RowDataManager.java:55)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.FacesCtrlHierBinding$FacesModel.setRowIndex(FacesCtrlHierBinding.java:800)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
<LoopDiagnostic> <dump> [8261] variableIterator variables passivated >>> TrackQueryPerformed def
<LifecycleImpl> <_handleException> ADF_FACES-60098:El ciclo de vida de Faces recibe excepciones no tratadas en la fase RENDER_RESPONSE 6
What is the best way to display this amount of data in a af:table and do CRUD operations?
Thanks
Edited by: 972255 on 05/12/2012 09:51

Hi,
honestly, the best way is to provide users with an option to filter the result set displayed in the table to reduce the result set size. No-one will query 2.00.000 rows using the table scrollbar.
So one hint for optimization would be a query form (e.g. af:query)
To answer your question "srollable" vs. "page range", see
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21043_01/web.1111/b31974/bcadvvo.htm#ADFFD1179
Pay attention to what is written in the context of +"The range paging access mode is typically used for paging through read-only row sets, and often is used with read-only view objects.".+
Frank

How to Capture a Table with large number of Rows in Web UI Test?

HI,
Is there any possibility to capture a DOM Tabe with large number of Rows (say more than 100) in Web UI Test?
Or is there any bug?

Hi,
You can try following code to capture the table values.
To store the table values in CSV :
*web.table( xpath_of_table ).exportToCSVFile("D:\exporttable.csv", true);*
TO store the table values in a string:
*String tblValues=web.table( xpath_of_table ).exportToCSVString();*
info(tblValues);
Thanks
-POPS

How to determine count for the number of rows

Appreciate if any of you could think of a way of determining the count for the number of rows in the subquery without having to run another query.
SELECT *FROM
(SELECT rownum, rn, rlp_id, rlp_notes, cad_pid, status, jurisdiction_id, s.state_abbr, rlp_address, rlp_route_id, rlp_route_section, psma_version FROM ipod.relevant_land_parcels r, state s WHERE s.state_pid = r.state_pid(+) AND rlp_route_id = 'SM1' AND status = 'CURRENT')WHERE rn > 200 AND rn < 216
And I want to import this into.net and C# environment.

Something like this,.....????
SQL> select * from emp;
EMPNO ENAME      JOB         MGR HIREDATE          SAL      COMM DEPTNO
7369 SMITH      CLERK      7902 17/12/1980     800,00               20
7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN   7698 20/02/1981    1600,00    300,00     30
7521 WARD       SALESMAN   7698 22/02/1981    1250,00    500,00     30
7566 JONES      MANAGER    7839 02/04/1981    2975,00               20
7654 MARTIN     SALESMAN   7698 28/09/1981    1250,00   1400,00     30
7698 BLAKE      MANAGER    7839 01/05/1981    2850,00               30
7782 CLARK      MANAGER    7839 09/06/1981    2450,00               10
7788 SCOTT      ANALYST    7566 19/04/1987    3000,00               20
7839 KING       PRESIDENT       17/11/1981    5000,00               10
7844 TURNER     SALESMAN   7698 08/09/1981    1500,00      0,00     30
7876 ADAMS      CLERK      7788 23/05/1987    1100,00               20
7900 JAMES      CLERK      7698 03/12/1981     950,00               30
7902 FORD       ANALYST    7566 03/12/1981    3000,00               20
7934 MILLER     CLERK      7782 23/01/1982    1300,00               10
14 rows selected
SQL>
SQL> select max(rw) from
2 (
3 select empno , row_number () over (order by empno) rw from emp
4 where job='CLERK'
5 )
6 /
   MAX(RW)
         4Greetings...
Sim

Always get MaxMessageSizeExceededException on large number of MBeans

I have 60 apps deployed on my Cluster (with 2 ManagedServers), and each App has a large number of MBeans. If I go to the custom tree using wlst, I always get this error, even though the MaxMessageSize has been set way way higher.
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
The ManagedServers are started with the ClusterManager, and each ManagedServer has the Arguments set for ServerStart:
-Xms4g -Xmx8g -XX:MaxPermSize=7g -d64 -XX:+UseCodeCacheFlushing -XX:NewSizeThreadIncrease=100 -Dweblogic.ThreadPoolPercentSocketReaders=50 -Dweblogic.ThreadPoolSize=100 -Dweblogic.SelfTuningThreadPoolSizeMin=1000 -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20971520 -Djava.library.path=/install/Middleware/wlserver_10.3/server/native/linux/x86_64
The AdminServer has been set with a similar MaxMessageSize, and the wlst from where I issue the custom() command, has been started with "-Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20971520" too.
To top it off, I checked the JVM's with jinfo to double check the weblogic.MaxMessageSize, and all do comply to the specified bytes, none being 10M of the error message.
I am able to reproduce the issue on Linux x64 as well as Solaris 11 Sparc.
Could it be related to the MBeans (as I assume)? When I only deploy 55 apps, the issue does not occur. Any other tips are welcome.

Here WLST would be acting as the client. It seems that you have placed the setting of the message max size on the server side (which is one part of the tuning), but you need to place the same to the WLST too or for that matter any other client like applet, stand-alone java code.
In short you can try the following, if you wish:
set the environment using setDomainEnv.sh/cmd and the run:
java -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20971520 weblogic.WLST
Note: I read through your note about providing "-Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20971520" parameter to WLST, but not sure whether you have checked WLST process with jinfo or the WLS server nodes.
Also I am not sure what type of application you are using by you can consider passing the above property via System.property() call to the application.
Additionally, I would request you to share some more information, like the config (snippet), jinfo output, and WLST output if you try to locate the current MaxMessageSize value of the server by connecting to it, complete stack (if any).. in case the above does not help.
Note: I have tried this multiple times and it works like a charm. But from your notes it seems to a case of overridding of parameters value.
HTH,
AJ

IBaseMessage.Context getting disposed for large message processing (There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: Reason: Cannot access a disposed object. Object name: 'MessageContext'.

Hi,
I am trying to parse a large message (2.7 MB file) in a custom Flat file Disassembler (inherited from the Microsoft.BizTalk.Component.FFDasmComp) this does exactly the same work for FFDasmComp but also promotes the count of disassembled messsages. This
works fine for small messages but for large messages I get this error
There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: "<pipeline name>, <Pipeline assembly>" Source: "Custom FlatFile Disassembler" Receive Port: "ReceivePort7" URI: "<the input file location>" Reason: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'MessageContext'.
In the event log
what I am doing inside the custom flat file assembly is, I am saving all the disassembled messages in a List<IBaseMessage> and then finally when GetNext() method returns null I am promoting the nRecordCount in the messageContext of all the disassembled
messages. This is where I get the error when trying to promote to the message context.(Cannot access a disposed object, Object name: 'MessageContext'). I think the messagecontext is getting disposed, but it should not as I still hold its reference in
the List<IBaseMEssage);
private long nRecordCount = 0;
private List<IBaseMessage> oDisassembledMessages = new List<IBaseMessage>();
Any idea why this happens ?
Thanks in advance, PLEASE HELP
Surya

Hi Surya,
Are you still facing this issue? and are you using Flat File Disassembler in your Receive pipeline?
If yes then set 'RecoverableInterchangeProcessing' to True.
Please have a look in below articles-
BizTalk
Pipeline - Flat File Disassembler Cannot Access a Disposed Object 'DataReader'
biztalk-esb-toolkitflat-file-debatching
BizTalk
Server: List of Errors and Warnings, Causes, and Solutions
This issue can also occur if you are using Large Size message, in this case you will have to optimize your code.
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Java executed SQL statement to XML - large number of rows

Hello,
I have to write some code to generate XML as the result of a query. AFAIK I am using the latest versions of the relevant Java libraries etc.
I have found that using a max_size function above 2000 results in 'Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError' errors
I thought I could overcome this by reading the data in batches using the skip_rows functionality.
I have included the code I am using below and would appreciate any help.
Best Regards,
Mark Robbins
import java.sql.*;
import java.math.*;
import oracle.xml.sql.query.*;
import oracle.xml.sql.docgen.*;
import oracle.jdbc.*;
import oracle.jdbc.driver.*;
public class XMLRetr
public static void main(String args[]) throws SQLException
String tabName = "becc";
String user = "test/test";
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
//initiate a JDBC connection
Connection conn =
DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:oracle:oci8:"+user+"@test");
// initialize the OracleXMLQuery
OracleXMLQuery qry = new OracleXMLQuery(conn,"select * from "+tabName+" where TRUNC(SAMPLED) < \'14-NOV-99\'" );
// structure the generated XML document
System.out.println("Before setting parameters");
qry.setMaxRows(8000); // set the maximum number of rows to be returned
qry.setRowsetTag("ROOTDOC"); // set the root document tag
qry.setRowTag("DBROW"); // sets the row separator tag
qry.setRaiseException(true);
qry.keepCursorState(true);
// create the document generation factory. Note: there are methods in OracleXMLQuery
// which don't require that an OracleXMLDocGen object be passed in; but rather, they
// create an OracleXMLDocGen object of their own.
OracleXMLDocGen doc = (OracleXMLDocGen) new OracleXMLDocGenString();
for (int rowCnt = 1; rowCnt < 8000; rowCnt = rowCnt + 1000)
// get the xml
System.out.println("Before skip rowCnt:"+rowCnt);
qry.setSkipRows(rowCnt); // process next batch
System.out.println("Before getXML");
// this is where I get the exception on the second iteration of the loop
qry.getXML(doc);
System.out.println("Displaying document");
// System.out.println(doc.getXMLDocumentString());
System.out.println("Row number:"+rowCnt);
System.out.flush();
System.out.println("End of document");
qry.close();
null

I used qry.getXMLString()
But called it for every row, ie, set
qry.maxRows(1) and qry.skipRows(rowcount-1).
The down side is I had to postprocess the String to remove the processing instruction and doc level tags.

Large number of rows in ResultSet

Hai,
I have huge number of rows retrive from database using ResultSet but it seems to be slow to get records. When it retrive data from database can we read data from ResultSet?.
Advance wishes,
Daiesh

No, he can't, but who's to say that's what's slowing
him down? Could be bad JDBC code, old JDBC drivers,
or bad queries. Could be.
Honestly why does it matter to you? It matters a great deal.
If he's talking about a web page, and LOTS of people who ask this question are bringing that data down to the browser, my answer would be that no user wants to deal with 500K records all at once. A well-placed WHERE clause or filter, or paging through 25 at a time a la Google, would be my recommendation in that case.
Did you have an
answer all prepared to go so long as he gave you a
reason that was up to your rigorous standards? Yes, see above.
You
could have said "make sure you really need all that
data, and if you do, then try X, Y, and Z to speed it
up". But to just throw that out with no evidence
you're prepared to help regardless? Why bother?See above. There was a reason for the question.
Oh wait... I get it ... did I mistake your submission
to "The Most Useless, Unhelpful, and Arrogant Post
Contest" for a real post? My bad...Nope, that would be yours, dumb @ss.
%

% is not getting correctly for the Grand Total Row in OBI10g

Hi,We have a report in table view with the following structure.
Name     Target     Act     %Ach
ABC     100     50     50
XYZ     200     10     5
Total     300     60     27.5
The value for the %Ach Total row should be 20% but in the report it is showing as 27.5.
any one observed this ,how to correct this??
Thanks

Hi,
To get grand total correctly..configure instanceconfig.xml and put..
<ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> between <serverinstace>..
refer..
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2009/09/obiee-grand-totals-with-calculated.html
Hope it solves ur problem

Deleing large number of rows from table

Hi,
Consider tables A,B,C,D,E,F. all are having 100000++ records Tables B,C,D are dependent on table A (with foreign key constraint). When I am deleting records from all tables, table B,C,D are taking max 30-40 seconds while table A is taking 30-40 mins. All tables are having indexes.
Method I have used:
1. Created Temp table
2. then deleted all records from B,C,D,E,F for all records in temp table for limit of 500.
delete from B where exists (select 1 from temp where b.col1=temp.col1);
3. please suggest options for me why it is taking too much time for deleting records in table A.
Is there any thing that during deleting data from such master table, it is reffering to all dependent tables even if dependent data is not present ??? If yes then couls you please please suggest options for me to remove this ? I hope it won't go for CHECK constraints during deleting data.
Thanks,
Avinash
Edited by: user12952025 on Apr 30, 2013 2:55 AM
Edited by: user12952025 on Apr 30, 2013 2:56 AM
Edited by: user12952025 on Apr 30, 2013 2:57 AM

user12952025 wrote:
Hi,
Consider tables A,B,C,D,E,F. all are having 100000++ records Tables B,C,D are dependent on table A (with foreign key constraint). When I am deleting records from all tables, table B,C,D are taking max 30-40 seconds while table A is taking 30-40 mins. All tables are having indexes.What attribute of the Foreign key is specified? Is it On Delete Cascade? If yes, then in a way, deleting data fro Child tables is un-necessary. Only a Delete from parent shall suffice.
>
Method I have used:
1. Created Temp table
2. then deleted all records from B,C,D,E,F for all records in temp table for limit of 500.
delete from B where exists (select 1 from temp where b.col1=temp.col1);
3. please suggest options for me why it is taking too much time for deleting records in table A.
Is there any thing that during deleting data from such master table, it is reffering to all dependent tables even if dependent data is not present ??? If yes then couls you please please suggest options for me to remove this ? I hope it won't go for CHECK constraints during deleting data.One another way is to "Switch-Off" the relationship while deleting the data.
ALTER TABLE table_name
disable CONSTRAINT constraint_nameAnd then Delete the data from each of tables.
You did specify the number of rows in each table, it would have been better to mention the number of rows to be deleted.
It is not a hard-and-fast way, but would generally perform better, to copy the data (to be retained) from Parent Table into a Temporary Table, Drop Parent Table and rename teh Temporary table to parent table. Similar can be performed on Child tables.
You may then Enable the Foreign key constraints.

Export to Excel - Large number of Rows

Hi All,
I have a report in Answers which returns around 150,000 to 200,000 records. I tried to export this report in Excel as well Excel 2000 format.
I got only 65,004 records.But in the page navigator shows like this Records 1-65000. When i click Update Row Count in the Physical Layer it shows 170,560 records. When i click 'All Pages' button in the Page navigator, page gets hung. How to fix this issue?
Also the Excel has a limit of 65,536 rows per sheet. If the no of records exceeds the excel limit then one more sheet need to be added automatically with the records. How to configure this setting?

Excel has the limit of accomodating 65k rows,i don't think we can change excel limit. when it comes to OBIEE report you can change the instance config file(OracleBI Data/web/config to accomodate any number of rows as per your convenience.
Thanks

Jtable on JScrollPane get corrupted for large number of rows

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for