KE27 - Periodic Valuation problem

Dear all,
Till two months ago KE27 was running smoothly. Unfortunately, the past two months I have the following issue: KE27 needs to be execucuted twice so all billing documents (F) are valuated.
The first run of KE27 leaves out many billing documents with no obvious cause or pattern. After a few days when this issue is recognized we run periodic valuation again and billing documents not taken into account in the previous run are valuated.
Any advice would be appreciated and rewarded.
Kind regards,
Orestis Chaitas

Hi,
Hi,
The T-code-KE27-Run Periodic Valuation of Actual data is actually meant for actual data related postings for CO-PA. Periodic valuation makes it possible for you to select and valuate actual data which has already been posted to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA). It uses a valuation strategy defined especially for the point of valuation 02 (Periodic actual valuation). This function is available for the record types A (incoming sales orders) and F (billing data) as well as user-defined record types.
Periodic valuation is useful, for example, if you posted line items to CO-PA at the beginning of the period using the standard cost of goods manufactured, and want to evaluate them again later using the most up-to-date costs or using the actual costs of goods manufactured determined in Material Ledger.
The system posts the difference between the original values of the line item and the new values in a new, separate line item. If you perform periodic valuation more than once for a single line item, the system posts a new "difference" line item each time the values change.
Once you have performed periodic valuation, you can display the new values in the information system.
For valuation using material cost estimates, you can choose the alternative option of displaying the periodically calculated values separately from the original values. To do this, you need to define special value fields into which to store the values from periodic valuation.
Only values that are calculated in CO-PA during valuation can be recalculated in periodic valuation. However, those quantities and values that are stored according to the same value field assignment found in SD pricing when transferred from sales orders and billing documents remain unchanged
CKMLCP is not must for KE27.
Revert for clarification.
S.Subbiah.

Similar Messages

  • Credit Memos and KE27 periodic valuation

    Hi
    We created a credit memo without reference to a billing document with actual goods return in period 03 2012 (June 2012). Then we ran ML settlement.
    We when we ran KE27  we got the error message MLCCS030 no valuation exists for material #
    We did not know why this was a problem. When we received the credit memo for goods return copa was created with
    COGS value field was filled with say 100$.
    Also qty field was filled with say 10 numbers.
    Any thought proces. We are in midst of closing and we need response very soon.
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi,
    Hi,
    The T-code-KE27-Run Periodic Valuation of Actual data is actually meant for actual data related postings for CO-PA. Periodic valuation makes it possible for you to select and valuate actual data which has already been posted to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA). It uses a valuation strategy defined especially for the point of valuation 02 (Periodic actual valuation). This function is available for the record types A (incoming sales orders) and F (billing data) as well as user-defined record types.
    Periodic valuation is useful, for example, if you posted line items to CO-PA at the beginning of the period using the standard cost of goods manufactured, and want to evaluate them again later using the most up-to-date costs or using the actual costs of goods manufactured determined in Material Ledger.
    The system posts the difference between the original values of the line item and the new values in a new, separate line item. If you perform periodic valuation more than once for a single line item, the system posts a new "difference" line item each time the values change.
    Once you have performed periodic valuation, you can display the new values in the information system.
    For valuation using material cost estimates, you can choose the alternative option of displaying the periodically calculated values separately from the original values. To do this, you need to define special value fields into which to store the values from periodic valuation.
    Only values that are calculated in CO-PA during valuation can be recalculated in periodic valuation. However, those quantities and values that are stored according to the same value field assignment found in SD pricing when transferred from sales orders and billing documents remain unchanged
    CKMLCP is not must for KE27.
    Revert for clarification.
    S.Subbiah.

  • Zero values in Periodic Valuation User Exit (EXIT_SAPLKEAB_001)

    Dear All,
    Can anyone give a perspective on the following issue:
    We are using periodic valuation (ke27) and user exit EXIT_SAPLKEAB_001 in order to valuate COGS. There are instances where we have to zero our specific value field COGS for a material for all previous months of the year.The issue is that although we initialize the specific line items in the exit properly, no revaluation postings are made. When, instead of initializing, we give a specific value ( i.e. '0.01' ) the posting is made.
    Kind Regards,
    Orestis

    Hi Dalip !
    Welcome on board !
    "Has anyone figured out how/where step 3 is used ?"
    SURE !!!
    Take a look to https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/bi -> Services & Implementation -> HOW TO... Guides -> Guide List SAP BW 2.x -> How to... Verify the Variable Input
    Hope it helps!
    Bye,
    Roberto
    (and please don't forget to assign points to the answers...it's THE way to say thanks here!)

  • Periodic valuation (02) COPA

    Hi Experts!
    I m using point of valuation 02 (periodic valuation) to populate results in COPA on the base of modified cost estimate to get updated ROH & VERP Cost. Now i m going to activate material ledger, where the same point of valuation would be used to populate actual cost (periodic rate) in COPA. But the restriction is that, i can only assign value fields for one strategy, i.e. for modified cost estimate as i mentioned above.
    My question is, can i use same point of valuation (02) to populate the results in different value fields for modified cost estimate and periodic rate (actual cost).
    Br,
    Tayyab

    Hi Tayyab
    As far as I know, in the standard system its not possible... You want to post revaluated COGS based on 2 separate cost estimates into separate set of value fields each time...
    As you rightly said, the Costing keys, VF Assignment can all be done at the level of PV = 02... After seeing your case, I feel there should have been an option of including Valuation Strategy as well in KE4J/KEPC, KE4U etc
    The only way I see is to use exit COPA0002 and see if you can achieve the desired result... i.e. for PV=02, assign a Userexit in KE4U and from there you can try achieving your desired result
    br, Ajay M

  • VALUATION PROBLEM

    WHAT IS VALUATION PROBLEM?

    hi
    The SAP R/3 System allows you to valuate stocks of a material either together or separately, that is, according to different valuation criteria. Split valuation is necessary if, for example:
    1. Stock from in-house production has a different valuation price than externally procured stock.
    2. Stock obtained from one manufacturer is valuated at a different price than stock obtained from another manufacturer.
    3. Different batch stocks of a material have different valuation prices.
    4. Value damaged and repair part differently from a new part.
    To used split valuation, you have to activate it using 'OMW0'.
    To change split material valuation once it has been set, you must
    1. first post out all stocks (for example, to a cost center or with movement type 562)
    2. then change the control parameters
    3. if necessary, change the automatic account determination
    4. finally post the stocks back in again
    In split valuation, you can distinguish between partial stocks of a material according to certain criteria and valuate them separately.
    The material stock is divided according to valuation category and valuation type.
    The valuation category determines how the partial stocks are divided, that is, according to which criteria.
    The valuation type describes the characteristics of the individual stocks.
    With the function "Setting" you can determine:
    which valuation categories exist in your company (global categories)
    which valuation types exist in your company (global types)
    which valuation types belong to which valuation category
    which valuation categories exist in a valuation area (local categories)
    Your entries are only relevant if you set split valuation as active in the function "Global settings".
    In the standard SAP R/3 System, the following valuation categories are default settings :
    B procurement type
    with the valuation types:
    "EIGEN" for in-house production
    "FREMD" for external procurement
    H Origin
    X automatic valuation (only for batch)
    To select split valuation ('OMWC'), proceed as follows:
    1. Determine the valuation categories and valuation types that are allowed for all valuation areas:
    global valuation categories via menu "Goto --> Global Categories"
    global valuation types via menu "Goto --> Global Types"
    2. Allocate the valuation types to the valuation categories.
    a) Select "Goto --> Global Categories".
    b) Position the cursor on a valuation category and select
    "Goto --> Global Categories --> Assignments --> 'Types->Category'".
    c) Activate the valuation types you want.
    3. Determine the local valuation categories for each valuation area.
    a) Select "Goto --> Local definitions".
    b) Position the cursor on a valuation area and select
    "Goto --> Local Definitions --> Allocate Categoires->Org.units (button Cats->(OU)".
    You obtain a list of the global valuation categories.
    c) Activate the categories to be used in this valuation area.
    The system creates the local valuation types based on the allocations under point 2.
    Only now can you create a master record with split valuation.
    -ashok

  • Profitablity analysis--periodic valuation (KE27) Can't be excuted/

    Dear All.
    When i Excuted KE27 in Profitablity analysis,there isn't the function 'EXCUTE 'icon and the 'EXCUTE' in the bar is grey .so I can't use the transaction code.I want to know how can i excute the tcode,thanks!
    Fanny.

    Un-install SIMBL and CleanMy Mac.
    You do not need to use cleaning programs. They can destroy your computer operation as they may already have done.
    CleanMyMac - Uninstall
    CleanMyMac2 Un-install
    After un-installing, run thos program to make sure you got all the pieces.
    EasyFind – Spotlight Replacement
    SIMBL Uninstall
    SIMBL Uninstall (2)     See solution posted by Linc Davis .

  • Split Valuation Problem

    Dear Friends,
    Initially when we created 1 RM article with out split valuation (It was not required at that time).
    Now stock is there and we want to maintain split valuation. Even though I removed the stock and Open items (i.e Open PO, Open Production Order) still system is not allowing me to create the Split Valuation.
    Now give me some suggestion, how to solve the problem.
    Regards,
    Zubaer.

    Assuming you have done configuration for split valuation,
    Maintain valuation category in material master(MM02).
    Extend material master accounting view with valuation type required,select valuation class as required,maintain MAP & save.
    Check it in MM60,Whether material is split valuated.

  • Win 7/Office 2010 hangs periodically - Network Problem?

    Hi,
    Our situation:
    We have one user (out of 60) at our company whose computer periodically goes into "spin cycle" and she must reboot it because it won't respond.  This happens a couple of times a week.  Generally, she always has Outlook 2010 open, along
    with a browser.  We have tried two different computers with the same setup (Win 7/MSO2010) and we are still seeing the "spin cycle".  We have tried two different Ethernet connections to our LAN switch and tried different ports on the LAN
    switch.    We are not sure what else to check, or where to begin looking.  Could this have anything to do with DNS or DHCP or ??
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks, Linda

    Hi,
    How about your problem now? In my opinion, its hard to  identify what's the specific reason of this hung problem. Which app's process that came into Spin Cyle? Windows Explorer or Outlook, or both of them?
    To troubleshoot the problem, firstly, you can try to check Event log or Problem Report in Action Center. Generaly speaking, both of them would record the events of system hung.
    In addition, did you install any program before this problem occures? 3rd extension or app is most possible to cause this problem.
    If there is any progress about your poblem, please feel free let me know.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Stock Special Q valuated , problems

    hi guru´s
    I´ve several problems. In first place I create a WBS from PS .
    My material master is a valuated material.  After this, I create a PR, creat a PO with reference to PR and save.
    Problem: when I did the Goog Receipt the special stock Q is in my warehouse like non valuated.
    update quantity but not update value, so, when later y need take stock project with a reservation (movt tyoe 221 Q), the system don´t posting anything beacuse the value is zero.
    I see the mov type 101 Q, 221 Q, account assignment Q, obyc, but I don´t understand like work this. Maybe at the moment of create WBS is the question, i don´t know.
    Any body can help me please?
    Regards

    Hello Guru´s
    In order to advance in this topic, I explain my scenario.  need to do a posting transfer the "non valuated material" from project stock Q WBS project profile "valuated" to project stock Q WBS project profile "non valuated"
    It´s possible?
    I try with a posting change in 2 steps, but the account are not the correct.
    Steps:
    I create a new project profile as "stock valuated".
    After this, create a Network and WBS.
    The PR has been created to "non valuated material". The PR is convert in PO, and I did the GR , MIGO mov type 101 Q.
    The FI DOC posted
    account Asset : 310000 + wbs XXXXX1     usd 1000
    So, in project stock Q, I´ve inventory vauated in MBBS transaction. Here everythinks is rigth.
    After this, (remenber my material is "non valuated", I did a transfer mov type 411 Q, to transfer project stock to own stock.
    The FI DOC posted:
    account Asset :   310000 - wbs XXXXX1   usd 1000
    account Result :  Price Dif    610000    +
    Questions: How I can to do the FI doc posted?????
    account Asset :   310000 - wbs XXXXX1   usd 1000
    account Asset :   310000 +                         usd 1000
    After this, when I do a last trasnfer from own stock to project stock Q "non valuated project profile"
    T.code MB1B
    mov. type
    412 Q
    account Asset :   310000 -                      usd 1000
    account Result :     640000    +               usd 1000
    Thanks
    Regards

  • Sales Order realted Production Order Valuation Problem

    We have MTO scenario.
    We create a Sales Order and then with refernce to this Sales Order we create production Order through TC: CO08.
    We dont do sales Order costing.
    When we observe the plan price of the material in the production order, it is not getting valuated with the Standard price maintained in the material master.
    It is taking some other value.
    Why is this behaviour. We want to valuate the material at the std price from the material master.
    How to solve this issue.

    Unfortunately it is happening.
    I am agian trying to explain you the problem.
    Suppose I am making a sales order for material A.
    Through TC: CO08, I am making the production order with reference to this sales order.
    Now the material is having BOM Componenet say B.
    Now the problem is , when we create the production order, in the planed price,
    it is taking correct value for the Component B from the material master, but for the main material A, it is not taking the price that
    is maintained in the material master std price. The Costing variant used in Std One. No change in that.
    It is taking some different value. I dont know from where it is picking up.
    Just to reconfirm, is there anythign related to Requirement type and requirement class???
    Help me to solve this issue.
    regards

  • Terminal & "periodic" command problem.

    I noticed that my inactive memory was up to 8GB, so I decded to run "sudo periodic daily weekly monthly" to clean it out. It started, then almost immediately finished the task & I still had all that inactive memeory in use (with 365 MB free). Has periodic changed in the latest update or has it been munged and I need to reinstall terminal (or something else)?
    Jyri

    If that were true, it would be an incidental, undocumented side-effect that is, as such, not guaranteed to remain constant.
    A few notes... first, note that you probably never actually need to run those three scripts. See [Five Mac Maintenance Myths|http://www.macworld.com/article/133684/2008/06/maintenance_intro.html].
    Second, if you are not having some kind of performance issue, you should not be interpreting a high inactive memory number as a problem. Inactive memory should, under normal circumstances, be purged automatically when needed. Just ignore it
    Third, if you are having performance issues, they may not have anything to do with the inactive memory numbers. You may or may not have memory problems - your issues might be caused by something completely different. Try looking at the [Mac OS X speed FAQ|http://www.index-site.com/Macosxspeed.html].

  • Valuation Problem PLs Help

    Dear Experts,
    I have a mat Limestone which is minned from mines which includes different kinds of job. For each kind of job we have respective G/L a/c. where as Cost of Production G/L a/c is also there.
    I want to post all the cost booked in different G/L a/cs into the Cost of Prod Limestone.
    i.e cost of production a/c will contain all the booked cost from the respective g/l s
    How to achive that?
    plz guide me
    Thnx sankhajeet

    Hi Sankhajeet,
    in the SAP philosophy you would define the GL accounts as cost types and define the jobs as activity types linked to the cost types. Then the cost types would be assigned to cost elements in product cost controlling.
    A production order for limestone would consume the activities (posted as confimations) and will show in the production order cost analysis the costs by cost type (your GL accounts)
    If you want the analysis of the actual costs not by order but for material and period you might activate actual costsing /material ledger that would give you an monthly report on the actual costs by product broken down in the cost component split by the elemnts you defined. You can learn how to do that in the SAP documentation to product cost controlling.
    best regards,
                     Udo

  • HT1222 Will this update hjelp the periodic restart problem on iPhone 4S

    Will IOS6.1 update improve the restart problem that occurs with iPhone 4s?

    I tried all of the suggested solutions mentioned in this thread, and finally did a full reset according to Apple's instructions, step by step (as an engineer and 40 year computer user I am good at that stuff).
    Sorry to say after the several hour process, not one of the problems I have experienced have been solved. 
    IPad 2 is still running slow and choppy.
    Some Apps do not even load.
    Website pages will not load and result in error messages. One particularly annoying Safari error on loading a new web page is:  "a problem occurred with this webpage so it was reloaded".
    MY iPad  2 worked perfectly for the last couple of years through several updates that performed seamlessly, but this one and the two most recent corrected updates have rendered my iPad so degraded that I don't think I will be using it much anymore. I originally bought the tablet because of it's smooth GUI and fast performance, the reliability and error free environment, and Apple's proven record for effective updates. That's all gone now.

  • Periodic freezing problem

    Hey everyone,
         So, I've got a problem here. I've got a mid 2012 13" Macbook Pro that suddenly started doing this weird thing where applications will freeze on me for 10-25 seconds, give me the spinning beach ball, and then resume back to normal. I ran hard drive tests and nothing was found, I've got plenty of hard drive space (688GB) left. I tried uninstalling my internet browser, that didn't help, I tried running the computer in safe mode and found nothing. Theres no real rhyme or reason to what freezes up, it just seems like anytime I'm using any amount of my CPU over a few % it stops and I ran tests and I constantly have 80+% of my CPU free. I'm lost here and was wondering if someone could help?
    Here's the hardware specs:
      Model Name:          MacBook Pro
      Model Identifier:          MacBookPro9,2
      Processor Name:          Intel Core i7
      Processor Speed:          2.9 GHz
      Number of Processors:          1
      Total Number of Cores:          2
      L2 Cache (per Core):          256 KB
      L3 Cache:          4 MB
      Memory:          8 GB
      Boot ROM Version:          MBP91.00D3.B08
      SMC Version (system):          2.2f44
      Serial Number (system):          C02HXQ9ZDTY4
      Hardware UUID:          6CDC365D-BC3B-529F-8130-41559754B161
      Sudden Motion Sensor:
      State:          Enabled

    kcsigi,
    if you have a bootable external drive, try running from it using Startup Manager and see if you still get the freezing that way. If your MacBook Pro works well when booted from the external disk, but freezes when it runs from the internal disk, then a possible cause of the problem could be its internal SATA cable.

  • Dual Unit of Measure and valuation problem in SAP for Diamond module

    1. Handling of Dual Unit of Measure. In case if you take Diamond Jewellery, which is having Gold portion as well Diamond portion, we would like to keep UOM for gold portion as Grams and Carats for Diamond portion. As informed by our implementation team (Wipro), handling dual UOM for the same article seems to be not possible in SAP due to product limitations. As this feature is very basic for jewellery industry, we would like to know how SAP can address this business need in SAP.
    2. We would like to show Gold & Diamond separately in Valuation for the same article, which is again seems to be product limitation.
    As the above 2 issues are fundamental elements in our business, please look into the above issues and give us some solution immediately.
    Regards,
    M. Narasimha Rao
    A.G.M - IT, Khazana Jewellery (Corporate Office)
    Ph: 099401 20306

    Mr.Rao,
    Although I do not much about your business needs and the processes that you are configuring, this is what I understand from your explanations:
    1. You design and make jewellery out of Gold and Diamonds. Here I believe that the designer would be knowing how much of Gold and Diamond will go into the making of a jewellery.
    2. You would like to valuate the stock based on the gold/diamond gone into each. Each piece of jewellery is unique in itself as its contents may minutely vary for the gold content.
    In such a situation, I would suggest considering configuring Variant Configuration. With this, you will be able to maintain different values of diamond/gold for each piece of jewellery at the time of Sales Order/Production Order/Prod.Order confirmation etc. Your manufacturing cost will be at actuals based on the consumption posted during the Prod.Order confirmation. Each piece of jewellery will be unique with few Material Masters.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Keshav

Maybe you are looking for

  • Use of submit in report programming

    What is submit ..how it is used to pass parameters to reports....In what scenario we will use submit . can anyone guide me ??? Helpful answers will be rewarded.

  • Adding Component above all other components

    My initial problem is to put the panel (which is created as a result of a click on a button) above all components that have been added to the GBLTablePanel. I've written the following sample that demonstrates my problem package test; import java.awt.

  • SMTP Authentication for PHP Mail

    Can anyone help me in figuring out the correct way to incorporate the SMTP authentication into a form? I am having a lot of trouble in getting my forms to send with this format. My code for my php action page is below. I have my correct information w

  • Error when I try to use autotrace traceonly

    SQL> set autotrace traceonly SP2-0575: Use of Oracle SQL feature not in SQL92 Entry Level.Whta is it ?

  • Photo book quality

    I ordered an IPhoto Book and the book's binding is coming off.  Who should I contact?