KE42 records are not matching with report KE30

Guru s,
I have made some Plannig records for next year in KE42 ,say Trade, and later I ran KE30 to see the report for that particlar Trade, for that sales org and ccod but I do see some other number for Trade rather tahn seeing the same numbers for KE42, am I missing anything , Do I need to do anything else after creating records in KE42 ,
My main objective is to create records in KE42 and see the same in KE30 report,
Please let me know Do I have to do anything or Missing something?
Regards,
Paartha

Hi
Let me give you some example
in KE42
Freight Condition type Sales org           Price    Unit
ZXXX                           XYZ                  $1.5     Ton
in KE30
Sales order          Sales Org             Sales Qty          Freight Costs Value field
12345                   ZYX                     100 Ton                $150
You can't there compare KE42 and KE30.
Further in Planning, you can still plan based on the Sales order and Billing Documents as they are planning record types in COPA that you are targeting $ value of Sales documents and Billing Documents.
Regards,
Suraj
Edited by: Suraj Ramamurthy on Nov 10, 2008 7:12 PM

Similar Messages

Report Records are Not matching with database(Toad,oracle )

Hi experts ,
s/w sap bo 3.1
When iam executing one of my report ,it fetches data around 4000,
when I am executing same sql in toad database or oracle , I am fetching 6000 records .
There is 2000 records diff ,we are struggling with this issue from 4 days .
I across verified:
1. I enable and disabled the retrieve duplicate row .. still there is diff in records
2. Universe: disabled controls Limit size of result set to
3. even i tried creating derived table using same sql ,still issue with report data count report
Advance thanks for yours inputs

Hi Raghu,
Can you check below things -
1) Max rows retrieved condition in Query\Data Provider properties in your report. It might be set to 4000.
2) May be your rows retrieved are 6000, but in report it is aggregating the KPIs. Can you check what is the row count at database level if you apply Sum(KPI) + Group by.
3) What is the difference between the query generated by BO and query you are running at DB level? esp. the where clause.
Assuming: No record limitation is set at universe level.
Thanks,
Sameer

Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regards

hi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards

Grand total values are not matching with Detail report

Report has grand totals and when I drill to the detail report, grand total values are NOT matching with parent report totals, I did some analysis but I'm clueless on this issue.
Please provide your thoughts and insight on this issue..
Thanks

is your summary and detail reports hitting different facts, like summary hitting aggregate and detail report hitting it's corresponding detail level fact..?
if then,
From Front-end:
Fix the filter values in detail report that are passing from master report then try delete each columns then check the grand total. If you found your values is matching by deleting particular column then you need to investigate what is the issue around with that dimension table..
From Database side:
1. check first aggregate table has proper aggregate data of it's detail..
2. Take the detail report obiee generated query and try to comment each dimension table and it's corresponding joins to the facts, (before, this delete all the dimensional columns and other measures from select statement and put only that measure where you are getting wrong value, so that you need not to comment all the select and group by columns which saves your time.. ). Need to check by commenting each dimensional wid and it's table from clause, if you found that values is matching then there is some problem with wid columns data population in your ETL.
Is that BI-Apps project?
btw, whtz ur name?

Asset Balances Are Not Matching with General Ledger

HI,
After Doing asset year ending,balance carry forward,,,the Asset balances are not matching with the General ledger.what is the reason?
Kindly help me in this regard...it is very urgent.
Thanks
Sap Guru

Please run ABST2 for the relevant company code to reconcile FI and AA.
then check this out through ABST.
Regards
Velumani

GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger

Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap Guru

Hi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas

Some employees designations are not matching with their actual designation

Hi All,
While downloading to excel sheet some employees designations are not matching with their actual designations maintained in infotye 0001.
Designations should match with infotype 0001.
How to rectifty this issue.
Let me know...
Regards,
Sita

Hi
Looks like you are dowloading the value from a field which does not contain the value you see in the infotype screen
In infotypr 0001 place your cursor in the designation field.
Press F1
See the name of the field & the table.
Have a look at the table using se16 and confirm what you see in the field is what you see in the infotype screen.
If it is same see in your code if you are using correct field.
If it is not the same trace in which table and field the value is stored and code your program to download from there.
Check in Tables HRP1000 and PA0001 and you should get your values
regards
Pravin

DB Connect DataSource PSA records and DSO records are not matching...

Dear All,
I'm working with SAP NetWeaver BW 7.3 and for the first time, I have loaded from Source System DB Connect. I have created a DataSource and pulled all records and found 8,136,559 records in PSA. When I designed and created DSO with Key Fields 0CALDAY, Item No and Company Code, it has transferred records about 8,136,559 and added records about 12,534 only. Similarly following InfoCube has about 12,534 records into its Fact table. When I tried to reconcile the data/records with source DBMS for a month, the records/data could not matched?
1. What could be the reason behind the issue? why I am unable to load the records/data correctly?
2. Have I not mentioned the Key Fields of DSO in a correct manner?
3. Is it possible to load the records/data into DSO without giving any field as Key Fields?
4. How should I resolve this issue?
5. Is it could be of DSO Overwrite and summation function utilization if yes, then how to utilize it?
Many thanks,
Tariq Ashraf

Dear Tariq,
1. What could be the reason behind the issue? why I am unable to load the records/data correctly?
Ans: Check transformation once. Is there any start routine you have used or direct assignments. What kind of DTP settings you have done.
Check the messages at the DTP monitor. You will surely find some clue. Any duplicate records are being detected or not check once if you are using semantic keys in your DTP.
2. Have I not mentioned the Key Fields of DSO in a correct manner?
Ans: The transformation key and the DSo key are they same in your case?
What kind of DSO is it? Like for sales order DSO you take Order number as a key field., So you have to define the key fields according to business semantics I suppose. Do you agree?
3. Is it possible to load the records/data into DSO without giving any field as Key Fields?
Ans: I dont think so as the keys you defined will help in having unique data records isnot it?
4. How should I resolve this issue?
Ans: Please check the above as in Ans:1 please share your observation.
5. Is it could be of DSO Overwrite and summation function utilization if yes, then how to utilize it?
Ans: DSO overwriting of key figures is useful when you have full loads in picture. Are you always going to perform full loads ?
For reference would you like to check this thread: Data fileds and key fields in DSO
Lets see what experts give their inputs.
Thank You...

No.of transferred records do not match with delta records in RSA7

Hi,
The full update was failing since a number of days in 0vendor because of error in the source system. So I did an initialize with data transfer and corrected the PSA data and updated it using scheduler in the infoobject. In this case the number of transferred records was 24300 and added records was 0.Next I executed the delta infopackage and was expecting 0 records,since there were 0 records in rsa7. But I got 16000 records.Can you explain me why this happened?
Regards,
Shalaka

Hi Shalaka,
In which version of SAP you are working?
You might want to have a look at the table BDCP2 which is a different table that handles the delta mechanism for the change pointers.
You can reset the processing status using the program RSA1BDCP ex with following entries.
Now, coming to your issue - to verify the initial loads I am listing some basic checks(step by step).
You can give it a try in Dev/QAS if you have any restrictions in Prod.
1. Check and verify if the RSA7 delta queue is present.
2. In BW system, delete the INITIALIZATION request from infopackage - This should delete the delta queue from RSA7 in ECC system. (I am not 100% sure about this so try this once)
3. Re-initialize the datasource from BW system and note the no. of incoming records in BW. This should match with LFA1 entries.
4. Check the delta queue in RSA7 - There should be a new delta queue created
5. Start the Delta load - The should not be any records coming in to BW
6. Check the entries in table BDCP2 and its process indicator.
7. Create a new vendor from XK01 and check the entry again in BDCP2 table.
8. Run the delta again in BW and this time delta should have the newly created vendor.
Also be aware that since its a master data datasource and deals with change pointers you will not see any entries in RSA7.
A possible reason I could think of you getting 16000 records in delta is because you might have initialize the datasource is past and then started the FULL loads. So the deltas actually started accumulated in BDCP2 with processing status as BLANK and then when you triggered delta again back now all the historical deltas are processed.
This apply with BDCPV too if you are on older version of SAP.
Did you tried running delta's multiple times - you should not face any delta records when the processing status of change pointers is set to 'Processed' i.e. 'X'.
PS: You can find the message type for 0VENDOR_ATTR in ROOSGEN table. This will be useful in looking at table BDCP2.
Please let me know if there are any questions.
Thanks
Amit

The rendered records are not consistent with the range

After changing the range with record navigator to render the records,
if navigate to other page and go back,the rendered records will not be
consistent with the record range.
The issue can be reproduced as follows.
1.when select 1-10 range,the first 10 records are rendered.
2.select [Next 10 records] to render the 11-13 records.
3.change to other page and return to the original page.
It is found that the 11-13 records are rendered but the range is 1-10.
You can verify the issue by executing SampleMainPG.xml of the Tutorial.jpr for 11.5.10.2
from Jdeveloper after changing the SampleMainCO.java as below.
* Layout and page setup logic for a region.
* @param pageContext the current OA page context
* @param webBean the web bean corresponding to the region
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
if (pageContext.getTransactionValue("link") != null)
OAAdvancedTableBean inner = (OAAdvancedTableBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("InnerTable");
inner.clearCache(pageContext);
inner.setAttributeValue("CLEAR_CACHE_ONCE_NOEXECUTE_ATTR", Boolean.TRUE);
<==comment out these original source above.
OAAdvancedTableBean outer = (OAAdvancedTableBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("OuterTable");
outer.queryData(pageContext, false);
<==add the two rows of source above to get the latest query data.
you should to make the records of the table fwk_tbx_employees to be more than 10 just using the SQL script below.
(just need to change EMPLOYEE_ID at your will)
INSERT INTO fwk_tbx_employees (
EMPLOYEE_ID,
TITLE,
FIRST_NAME,
MIDDLE_NAMES,
LAST_NAME,
FULL_NAME,
EMAIL_ADDRESS,
MANAGER_ID,
POSITION_CODE,
SALARY,
START_DATE,
END_DATE,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY,
ATTRIBUTE1,
ATTRIBUTE2,
ATTRIBUTE3,
ATTRIBUTE4,
ATTRIBUTE5,
ATTRIBUTE6,
ATTRIBUTE7,
ATTRIBUTE8,
ATTRIBUTE9,
ATTRIBUTE10,
ATTRIBUTE11,
ATTRIBUTE12,
ATTRIBUTE13,
ATTRIBUTE14,
ATTRIBUTE15 )
VALUES (
17,
'ichiro',
'yamada',
'ichiro yamada',
1,
0,
sysdate,
sysdate,
sysdate,
0,
sysdate,
0,
0,
it seems that if use the functions below,the issue can be workarounded.
But it is not clear whether there is any other impact from these functions.
innerTable1.clearCache(pageContext);
innerTable1.setAttributeValue("CLEAR_CACHE_ONCE_NOEXECUTE_ATTR", Boolean.TRUE);
Could you please share your idea?
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards,
Wang

FYI. I was able to do what I wanted by first going to page properties and removing unwanted fonts from appearance. Then edit the page, select all, change style to normal, then select the text where you want to use a different style and change style there. This gives consistent appearance with both browsers.

Reports are not posting with report repository webserver configured for Sin

Hi Everyone,
We have configured Single Signon on our Test environment (UADB1) using Sun Authentication Manager. Everything went well, we can login using our LDAP accounts except for one thing. The reports are not posting to the report repository.
Our setup goes like this. We have used only one webserver for login and for report repository purposes. SSL certificate was configured in the webserver and we are using https in the report node. Both URLs https://dv001.test.com:8450 and http://dv001.test.com:8400 were configured for Single Signon.
Report Node Definition
Node Name: uadb1
URL: https://dv001.test.com:8450/psreports/uadb1
Connection Information
https
URI Port: 8450
URI Host: dv001.test.com
URI Resource: SchedulerTransfer/uadb1
Below is the error I am getting. If I will use another webserver which is not the Single Signon configured as report repository the reports are posting. So, I am thinking this has something to do with the Single Signon setup and SSL. ANy idea? Thanks.
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:43 PostReport](3) 1. Process Instance: 9499/Report Id: 8465/Descr: Process Scheduler System Purge
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:43 PostReport](3) from directory: /psft/pt849/appserv/prcs/UADB1/log_output/AE_PRCSYSPURGE_9499
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](1) (JNIUTIL): Java exception thrown: java.net.SocketException: Unexpected end of file from server
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](3) HTTP transfer error.
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](3) Post Report Elapsed Time: 0.2300
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](1) =================================Error===============================
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](1) Unable to post report/log file for Process Instance: 9499, Report Id: 8465
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](2) Process Name: PRCSYSPURGE, Type: Application Engine
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](2) Description: Process Scheduler System Purge
PSDSTSRV.2093190 (10) [06/13/10 01:05:44 PostReport](2) Directory: /psft/pt849/appserv/prcs/UADB1/log_output/AE_PRCSYSPURGE_94

Duplicated thread : Reports not posting if using Single Signon webserver as report repo
Nicolas.

Asset Gl balances are not matching with Asset history

Hi Gurus,
I run the ABST2 transaction it is giving the error message .
Company code Asset balance sheet values are not completely posted
Message no. MQ554
Diagnosis
The asset balance sheet values in Financial Accounting are not posted
all depreciation areas in company code WIM to be converted.
Procedure
Start posting in Asset Accounting under Periodic processing.
Carry out an update run even if no documents are to be posted in the
test run.
Proceed

Hi gurus,
I executed in back ground. Still not matching.

Data mart cube to cube copy records are not matching in target cube

hI EXPERTS,
Need help on the below questions for DATA Mart-Cube to cube copy(8M*)
Its BW 3.5 system
We have two financial cube.
Cube A1 - Sourced through R/3 system (delta update) and Cube B1- Sourced through A1 cube.(Full update). These two cubes are connected through update rules with one to one mapping without any routines.Basis did a copy of back-end R/3 system from Production to Quality server.This happened approximately 2 months back.
The Cube A1 which extracts delta load from R/3 is loading fine. but for the second cube, (extraction from previous cube A1) i am not getting full volume of data instead i m getting meagre value but the loading shows successful status in the monitor.
We tried through giving conditions in my infopackage (as it was given in previous year's loading) but then also its fetching the same meagre volume of data.
To ensure that is it happening for the particular cube, we tried out in other cube which are sourced thro myself system and that is also getting meagre data rather than full data..
For Example: For an employee if the data available is 1000, the system is extracting randomly some 200 records.
Any quick reply will be more helpful. Thanks

Hi Venkat,
Did you do any selective delitions in CUBEA1.
first reconcile data cube1 & cube2 .
match totals of cube1 with cube2.
Thanks,
Vijay.

Trail Balance opening balances are not matching with previous FY clsng baln

Hi,
We have done GL Balances carry forward to 2009 F.Y, here GL code 1042600002 carry forwarded with 'Zero' balance and we have run the Trail balance sheet as on 31.03.2009 in T.Code ALR87012310
Here also it is showing Zero balance for respective GL.But when we run Trail balance as on 30.04.2009 with Fiscal year 2009 for 1st period the system is showing beganing balance Rs 38213.00
Why is system showing beganing balance? even we checkd up with T.codes FBL3N and FS10N there is also no closing balance.
Plz advise me how to proceed in this case
We are unable to analyse the sytem behaviour. Could you please suggest us the solutiion.
Thanks,
Saisri

Hi,
Thank you so much
We have carry forwarded GL balances in F.16 successfully now the problem is one GL balance has been forwarded with Zero balance but when we run the trail balance sheet (S_ALR_87012310 or F.08) as on 30.04.2009 with FY 2009 for period 1, the system is being shown opening balance.
Plz provide me possible solution
Thanks,
Saisri

FD10N and FBL5N Reports are not matching

Hi,
When i execute FD10N FBL5N reports for customer balance, Both are showing different balances, why they are not matching with each other?
My FBL5N open item blance is not matching with FD10N.what could be the reason?
Is there any other report to show customer opening balances other than FD10N?
thaanks

Dear Dogdays
This is selection parameters problems- means please check once again what you selected check boxes and also check for Dates what you given
To check both the above cases, FD10N for the year you see the difference. Double click on the balance value for the period where you have seen the difference. The double click will call FBL5N for the period and customer. If the total of the line item report matches the balance in FD10N, then the issue is selection criteria
Regards
shankar

KE42 records are not matching with report KE30

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for