Keeping two machines 100% synced

Here is my setup:
1.  MacBook Pro with 128 Gb SSD boot drive and 1 Tb secondary drive (using a caddy in place of SuperDrive)
2.  Mac Pro desktop with 128 Gb SSD boot drive and 1 Tb secondary drive (have additional drives in remaining 2 slots, but they aren't relevant to this)
I use the MBP in the field when shooting video and photos to dump files, do quick views and minor edits, even some minor word processing if I am on a client site and need to generate a form, and email/web searches, etc.  At home, I will sometimes use the MBP for full editing in a secondary office.
I use the MP for pretty much the same thing apart from the portable aspect.
Here's my question/desire/wish:
Is there a method or application whereby I can keep these two machines 100% synced once the MBP rejoins my home network?
Example 1:  I store the video/photo files on the 1 Tb secondary drive of the MBP.  When the MBP arrives home, it should immediately start syncing those files over to the MP's 1 Tb secondary drive in the same folder structure.
Example 2:  I install a new application on the MP.  That application (or files which the installer puts into place on the MP) get automatically installed or copied to their respective locations on the MBP.
Example 3:  I begin editing a Premiere project on the MBP.  I save it, get up and walk to the other office and sit down at the MP and open the same project and pick up where I left off on the MBP.  And vice versa.
Essentially what I am looking for is a "roaming profile" set up but with the redundancy of having two locations for everything, kept in total sync with each other, and reflecting changes as I make them, near simultaneously.
Ideally, and to make matters even more complicated, I would like this same set up to work with an additional machine, my wife's iMac.  She shoots alongside me in the field and we could both dump our files into the MBP, do whatever initial work needs to be done, and then pick up at home, she on her iMac looking at her photos, and me on the MP editing video.
I'm suspecting a possible solution involves a series of Automator scripts and folder actions, but I was hoping to find a more elegant, one-click idea.  Thoughts?  Suggestions?  Flame for requesting an entirely unreasonable feature?

Synchronizing data between devices is a complex issue, and there's no really ideal solution. This comment is an oversimplification.
Mail can be synchronized by storing it on a mail server that uses the IMAP protocol, such as iCloud. The mail stays on the server, so it's automatically in sync with all mail clients.
Several other kinds of data can be synced via iCloud, such as calendars, iWork documents, photos, Safari tabs and bookmarks, and keychains. Some third-party applications can also sync with iCloud, but not many. iCloud is easy to use, for the most part. The drawbacks of using it are, first, that it doesn't sync everything; and second, that some of your private information will be in the hands of strangers. Read the iCloud feature list and privacy notice carefully before deciding whether or how to use it. There should be no privacy concerns with iCloud keychain, because the data is encrypted end-to-end and is not accessible to anyone at Apple—but you have to take Apple's word for that.
A more comprehensive solution, and one that doesn't raise any privacy issues, is to set up an OS X Server on your network and create mobile accounts on your other Macs. You will then be able to synchronize all files in the home folder automatically at logout, or at any other time manually. The main drawback here is that OS X Server would be hard for most non-technical users to set up and maintain. Another is that the synchronization only works with Macs, not mobile devices.
Third-party software such as Unison can also be used to synchronize files over a network. Unison is free, but it's not easy to set up in a way that doesn't lead to conflicts when files are modified on different devices between synchronizations. To synchronize more than two Macs in this way, you'll want to use one as the master, and sync between it and the others.

Similar Messages

  • What's the best way to keep two hard dives synced?

    I've been looking at the best way to protect my data and I've learned a few things. My first thought was RAID but a bit more research showed RAID is not a fix-all. It has it's own problems and even if I use a RAID1 or RAID10 array (depending on the number of drives) a failure in one drive can actually set off another drive, killing multiple drives and still destroying my data. There are a few other issues I've seen, such as the way you need to manage a RAID system that don't overly appeal to me.
    So what I'm thinking now is two separate hard drives that are synced in some manner. Both of these drives are going to be sitting on the back of my iMac at all times so there's no real worry about their needing to be connected to back up. The question is how best to do it?
    So far my options are:
    Chronosync: Software wise, I know this can sync across drives and as such has been something that interests me. However, I'm not sure how powerful it is and I'm still curious about how I would have to use it.
    SuperDuper: Same thing as Chronosync, really, just a different piece of software.
    Rsync: To be honest, this is the one that interests me the most. I need to look into it a bit more I'm starting to think this might be a great choice for me. With some caveats.
    Basically, here are the things I'm going to use it for:
    Two 3–4 TB HDDs or RAID0 arrays.
    Storing of general project archives, images, documents, movies, music, that kind of thing.
    Possibly for system backup with Time Machine.
    Now, how I'd prefer it to work is:
    I keep both hard drives plugged in via FireWire cables.
    Ideally, whenever I edit, add or delete a file on one hard drive the change is immediately made to the other.
    Once the syncing is set up I never touch it again, don't have to.
    The only time I ever have to come back to it is if I'm swapping out one or both of the drives for larger ones.
    All of this is controlled by some sort of GUI
    I'm willing to accept terminal commands if I have to... But I'd really prefer not to. Also, if the syncing has to be done every hour or once a day or some other similar schedule I'm willing to accept that as well, though it's not preferred.
    So that's what I'm looking at doing. I'd love to hear what you guys think.

    True, it's not technically backup in the traditional sense. What I'm looking for is data protection and redundancy, which is a factor of backups. So in that sense it kind of is, but I see your point.
    Anyway, the reason I'm avoiding RAID is because:
    1. It can be a pain to manage.
    2. It's horribly inflexible.
    3. It's protection is limited.
    4. It brings it's own set of hazards.
    5. RAID arrays can be very expensive once they start getting complex.
    I will likely end up going RAID partially in the end simply because I have a 2 TB external and it's filling fast. I can grab a 3 TB now but I've heard reliability issues so instead I'm thinking two 4TB (2x2TB) RAID0 arrays that I sync.
    This gives me the benefit of RAID in a simple form, which bypasses the larger array complexities, while leaving me still fully protected and highly flexible. It also doesn't have the inherent risks of RAID because if one of the arrays goes down it will in no way effect the other.
    Honestly, I'm not worried about file changes. At all. I'm the only one who's touching the files (well, not true, but everyone else only has read-access). I also tend to not delete things (which is why I have a 2 TB drive that's filling fast). Expansion is my main concern and RAID expansion can be a nightmare unless you go for some of the more expensive systems that are easier to manage. With ease of management comes a hefty price.

  • How can I keep two macs in sync?

    I'm not referring to just syncing the files as I know there are services like dropbox available or file sharing. I would like to keep the mac at my office and the one at home automatically in sync. For example, if I make a change to a document at the mac in the office, the mac at home will sync the change as well. It's like working on the same computer but on two macs. How do I do that? Do I need a special program for this? Its so frustrating when I'm back home and all of sudden I need to drive back to the office to access a document. Thank you so much!

    POP accounts can be set up to leave mail on the server. Thus this mail could be accessed from several different computers.
    I used Eudora a while ago, and set up 2 accounts, one left email on the server, and one did not. I would normally check mail from the one that left it on the server (accounts like this on several macs). When I was ready to download the mail, then I would check it from the other account that existed on only one of the macs.
    So in Mail, you could set up for POP and leave mail on the server. Then when ready to download (and not be able to see mail from various macs) you could switch to another user account, where Mail would be set up to not leave mail on the server.
    However, iMap makes this whole process easier.
    Normally, iMap mail can stay on the server forever. But I do like to get my mail and store it on my Mac after an arbitrary period of time. So I have set up a smart rule in Mail.
    It is GET MAIL:
    if Date received is less than 10 days old
    perform the following actions: stop evaluating rules
    So every day the mail is received, and of course it is less than 10 days old, so the rules stop evaluating.
    When I am ready to download the messages I select all in the mailbox, and use command-option-L to apply the rules. Any messages less than 10 days old stay on the server, Older messages then follow the other rules which are listted after GET MAIL. Usually these just filter mail into specific dumb mailboxes on my Mac. And/Or they could color the mail, or whatever else I choose to do with the mail.

  • Two machines using syncing to one database.

    We're in development/eval for 7.0 Portal right now, and every time we sync to another
    machine the other machine(s) stop working and get "Null Portal Object" webflow
    exception. Is there a way to have multiple people hitting one database? We're
    thinking of letting each developer have her/his own BEA instance on her/his machine.
    Steve

    Steve,
    There are two ways to solve the problem of which one I know is described in
    the developers guide:
    1. Each developer should have his own enterprise application (e.g.
    developer1_app, developer2_app). The synchronization works by the
    enterprise id and I believe it's immediately propogated to the in-memory
    repository even when the developer is on another workstation. Separating
    the namespace by enterprise application name will solve that.
    2. Create separate database instances. This is the approach we took and
    it works fine. Everybody datasyncs in private now against the same
    <application-project> directory stored in our CMS.
    Hope that helps,
    Wayne
    Steve Lewis wrote:
    >
    We're in development/eval for 7.0 Portal right now, and every time we sync
    to another machine the other machine(s) stop working and get "Null Portal
    Object" webflow
    exception. Is there a way to have multiple people hitting one database?
    We're thinking of letting each developer have her/his own BEA instance on
    her/his machine.
    Steve

  • Two repositories in sync, checkoutallcomps

    What is a practical method of keeping two repositories in sync?
    We have two development repositories that we keep in sync for
    foundational/framework components:
    main development repository
    prototyping repository (new and unusual applications/services)
    The prototyping repository is kept synchronized with changes in
    the main development repository by exporting a workspace with
    IDs from the main repository and importing it into the
    prototyping repository. In order to import the workspace we need
    to check out all components in all plans/projects that are in the
    workspace export file.
    The problem we are having is that generated components in
    Express-generated projects---these are the "<...>Base<...>"
    classes---are not checked out by the fscript command
    "checkoutallcomps". It appears that the only way to check out
    all components in an Express-generated project is to check them
    out individually with the fscript command "checkoutcomp".
    fscript also does not appear to have any language constructs for
    iterating over all components in a project.
    Any ideas on the checkoutallcomps problem, or generally on
    keeping two repositories in sync?
    John Hodgson |Descartes Systems Group Inc.|Tel 1-519-746-8110 x2250
    Systems Engineer|120 Randall Drive |Fax 1-519-747-0082
    |Waterloo, Ontario |www.descartes.com
    |CANADA N2V 1C6 |[email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Ahh...Well this question about sync-ing Macs has been tossed around so much, the answer is down to you and which program you like the most.
    I personally would suggest DropBox or Sugar Sync for your needs, as Chronosync can sometimes be a bit temperamental (in my personal experience). With both DropBox and SugarSync you pay for how much data space you need to store the data and a good option in it is that you and select what you want sync-ed from one Mac and where you want it placed in the other Mac. You can have it Bidirectional (both ways) or just one direction. And also you then have another Online Backup of your data so you know its safe. With both Sugar Sync and DropBox you get encryption so no one can (theoretically) get your data while it is being transferred.
    I have tried both Sugar Sync and DropBox for a short period of time and they both are great for situations like yours.
    Now for what you want sync-ing is again down to what you need, but as you want your documents and Lightroom lib. then you basically need to sync your Documents, Pictures folder and Music folder (if you want it). I am guessing you have Lightroom and Photoshop installed on both Macs (if so, there is no need to sync then Apps folder).
    I personally no longer use a Sync method as I have set my Mac Pro up as a server so when out I can VNC and AFP back into it using a DynamicDNS host name. If you want to know about this option ask and I will explain in detail.
    Hope this Helps.
    Adam.

  • Using Lightroom Cloud to Sync Catalog Between Two Machines

    I have use of so many cloud services including the 20gb that Adobe gives me.  Is there a way i can sync my catalog on the cloud so that i can have all my metadata on both my laptop and desk top?  I also have 300gb of cloud storage though Copy.  I would just like some recomendations on how best to go about it. Thanks

    Hi Pat,
    Using Lightroom Cloud to Sync Catalog Between Two Machines
    If you’re running Lightroom on a laptop during your location shoots, you might want to take all the edits, keywords, metadata, and of course the photos themselves, and add them to the Lightroom catalog on your studio computer. It’s easier than it sounds: basically, you choose which catalog to export from your laptop, then you take the folder it creates over to your studio computer and import it.
    You need to decide whether you want to export a folder (all the imported photos from your shoot), or a collection (just your Picks from the shoot). In this case, we’ll go with a collection, so go to the Collections panel and click on the collection you want to merge with your main catalog back in your studio. (If you had chosen a folder, the only difference would be you’d go to the Folders panel and click on the folder from that shoot instead. Either way, all the metadata you added, and any edits you made in Lightroom, will still be transferred over to the other machine.)
    Please refer to http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1930499 for more details.
    Thanks!
    Eshant Jindal

  • Keeping two very large datastores in sync

    I'm looking at options for keeping a very large (potentially 400GB) TimesTen (11.2.2.5) datastore in sync between a Production server and a [warm] Standby.
    Replication has been discounted because it doesn't support compressed tables, nor the types of table our closed-code application is creating (without non-null PKs)
    I've done some testing with smaller datastores to get indicative numbers, and a 7.4GB datastore (according to dssize) resulted in a 35GB backup set (using ttBackup -type fileIncrOrFull). Is that large increase in volume expected, and would it extrapolate up for a 400GB data store (2TB backup set??)?
    I've seen that there are Incremental backups, but to maintain our standby as warm, we'll be restoring these backups and from what I'd read & tested only a ttDestroy/ttRestore is possible, i.e. complete restore of the complete DSN each time, which is time consuming. Am I missing a smarter way of doing this?
    Other than building our application to keep the two datastores in sync, are there any other tricks we can use to efficiently keep the two datastores in sync?
    Random last question - I see "datastore" and "database" (and to an extent, "DSN") used apparently interchangeably - are they the same thing in TimesTen?
    Update: the 35GB compresses down with 7za to just over 2.2GB, but takes 5.5 hours to do so. If I take a standalone fileFull backup it is just 7.4GB on disk, and completes faster too.
    thanks,
    rmoff.
    Message was edited by: rmoff - add additional detail

    This must be an Exalytics system, right? I ask this because compressed tables are not licensed for use outside of an Exalytics system...
    As you note, currently replication is not possible in an Exalytics environment, but that is likely to change in the future and then it will definitely be the preferred mechanism for this. There is not really any other viable way to do this other than through the application.
    With regard to your specific questions:
    1.   A backup consists primarily of the most recent checkpoint file plus all log files/records that are newer than that file. So, to minimise the size of a full backup ensure
         that a checkpoint occurs (for example 'call ttCkpt' from a ttIsql session) immediately prior to starting the backup.
    2.   No, only complete restore is possible from an incremental backup set. Also note that due to the large amount of rollforward needed, restoring a large incremental backup set may take quite a long time. Backup and restore are not really intended for this purpose.
    3.   If you cannot use replication then some kind of application level sync is your only option.
    4.   Datastore and database mean the same thing - a physical TimesTen database. We prefer the term database nowadays; datastore is a legacy term. A DSN is a different thing (Data Source Name) and should not be used interchangeably with datastore/database. A DSN is a logical entity that defines the attributes for a database and how to connect to it. It is not the same as a database.
    Chris

  • Installed firefox on two machines and created sync account on one. The other one does not sync

    I just freshly installed the latest Firefox on two machines. Created a new account on one of them and started to download some add-ons and changed the preferences, then got to the other and signed in. It finished syncing but none of my changes were applied to the second machine.

    Right now the add-ons got synced but the customization I did to the looks of it did not.
    These customizations are: moving the home button right next to the back button and removing the search bar.
    Conclusion: it takes a while(about an hour!!!!!) to sync these stuff, at least that is what happened with me though my connection was normal and not slow at all.

  • How to keep two HD's in sync?

    How to keep two HD's in sync? They both contain my Sample Libraries, one is in my desktop the other in my laptop…essentially they contain the same items, but, the thing is: when I'm working on one I begin to delete, modify and add to the pool, and so the two become out of sync.
    It's hard to know what exactly I've changed where. (So, what I usually do is take out things that I edit and re-save them separately, just in case, but this creates vast quantities of unnecessary duplicates).
    So, what I'd like, would be if I could just keep both of the in sync somehow?
    Here's what I'm thinking:
    What if I was to use Carbon Copy Cloner, and just clone one onto the other, back and forth regularly? (Using incremental backup BTW) Would that be a good idea? I'd be worried that things might get corrupted by being overwritten/modified so regularly? Or would that be OK? I mean what if I had changed a small portion of a sample on one HD and then CCC'd onto the other, is it going to detect such a change? And will it always safely copy it across?
    Thank you so much for any help.

    emirium wrote:
    It's hard to know what exactly I've changed where.
    Here's what I'm thinking:
    What if I was to use Carbon Copy Cloner, and just clone one onto the other, back and forth regularly? (Using incremental backup BTW)
    If you are very strict about changing just one drive at a time, you can use CCC or ChronoSync and I think it will be fine.
    BUT...if you are talking about making changes to both drives and trying to reconcile them, then you need ChronoSync or something similar. Because they allow you to preview exactly which files will be changed, in which direction, before you commit. I use a different utility (FoldersSynchronizer) for this purpose; it looks like ChronoSync achieves this through their Analyze window. At time I have stopped potential unintentional data loss by always previewing the changes.

  • Keeping Two iTunes Libraries in Sync.

    When iCloud became available, I was stoked to be able to sync the iTunes library on my work computer with my home computer. I thought that the cloud would keep my work computer up to date, updating new purchases automatically.  However, that doesn't seem to be the case.  My latest purchases on my home computer are not showing up on my work computer.  What do I have to do to keep these two in sync?  Is there a way to do it automatically?

    Even though this is an old thread, one way to sync your iTunes library is to use rsync and Automator. If you're doing it that way, you can also sync your movies, audiobooks, podcasts, etc. from one computer to another which was an advantage for me. I just bought a MacBook Air and I had the same problem as you. Here's my solution: http://leolabs.org/blog/idevices/keeping-itunes-libraries-in-sync/
    Regards,
    leolabs

  • Two machines, one user sync?

    We now have two machines running Snow Leopard.
    is there an elegant way to have one home user for both machines that syncs
    application support files?
    thanks
    ∞WES

    User>Library>Application Support>Address Book
    User>Library>Application Support>iCal
    these folders contain all the input data info for the apps.
    What I have done so far to sync is copy folder from one machine to the other,
    so all the entries are accessible on each machine.
    my question is more specifically:
    I entered an address in AddressBook on machine 1, is there a way to automate it showing up in my AddressBook on machine two?

  • I have two homes and I would like to keep my iPad2 in sync with my desktops in each home. How do I do that?

    I have two homes in two different staes and I spend time between the two. I would like to keep my iPad2 in sync with my desktops (PCs) in each of the homes as I travel between the two. When I try to sync with the second PC ( with my iTunes ID) it threatens to wipe out my iPad2. I just want to keep the two desktops and my iPad in sync. Please help.

    Put a copy of the most current iTunes Media library onto a USB hard drive. Replace the older library with the newer one. Repeat the process when you return to the other home.
    Or you can sync everything to iCloud where it is accessible anywhere you can connect via your Apple ID.
    iCloud Related:
    MobileMe: About moving to iCloud
    iCloud: Features that work with one account at a time on iOS 5 and OS X
    iCloud: How to back up iCloud data
    iCloud: Backup and restore overview
    iCloud: About storage buffering
    Using and troubleshooting Back to My Mac with your iCloud account on OS X Lion
    iCloud: Troubleshooting Find My Friends
    iCloud: Calendar Events, Reminders, To Dos, and Tasks behavior differs by application
    iCloud: Distinguishing between Calendars and Reminders
    iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Reminders and Tasks
    iCloud: Manually importing data from iCal to iCloud Calendar
    iCloud: Understanding where iCloud Calendars are displayed in iCal
    iCloud: Reminders are called Tasks in Microsoft Outlook on Windows
    iCloud: About the iCloud Web App Plugin for Internet Explorer
    iCloud: Troubleshooting web browser issues with icloud.com
    iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Bookmarks
    iCloud: How spam is filtered
    iCloud: Why was I spammed?
    iCloud: Keeping the Junk folder consistent between webmail and OS X Mail
    iCloud: How to get long email headers for iCloud accounts
    iCloud: About email aliases

  • Sync one folder two machines - Is it really that hard.

    Sync one folder two machines - Is it really that hard.
    I have one folder (with a bunch of subfolders totally 3k of image files) I'd like to mirror them on both my laptop and desktop machines.
    I'd like the Desktop machine to mirror everything on the laptop and when I travel with the laptop I add images once I return everything new will be copied over.
    Things I don't want in this system
    • Third party software, If the OSX 10.4.8 can do it all the better
    • Having to Manually hit a sync button. (But willing to budge on this one)
    • It Making a duplicate copy of the folder each and everytime it connects.
    I have looked at a few free items on mac's website:
    Auto-backup Script (written in 2000)
    http://www.apple.com/applescript/folderactions/05.html
    Sync Folders 0.9 (written in 2004)
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/automator/syncfolders.html
    But I can't seem to get either to work on my machines The script is asking me to do something that I can't even phyically do anymore in 10.4.8
    any idea's or suggestions?
    Thanks
    Robert Dall
    iMac G4, iBook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   80g video ipod (black is back baby!)

    So much for other people having lives to live...
    I'd help you out if I knew anything about rsync, and
    I'm sure many others would, too, but apparently the
    ones who do know are doing other things. Considering
    it's a weekend, that really shouldn't be surprising.
    There are people and companies that give such
    immediate service for a fee. Look around and I'm sure
    you'll find one that'll offer to not only advise you
    but will also create the solution for you. They'll
    even you let you have the solution, for a price.
    Azqi, please don't belittle me about how the captitalism works in the world. I might been in a small community outside Vancouver that doesn't even have a large MAC dealership who could answer my question. I was already at the shop that does deal in mac because I wanted to SHOP LOCAL. I am perfectly aware I am on a FREE forum and have a life outside of this forum also! I waited four days before I said what I said and before my little question was lost in the forums. If I had 300 responses to my question like yours I'd never return. . . .
    I am just saying that it has been a bit of a cold welcome to these forums, as this isn't the first question that has gone unanswered. . . . and thanks to some helpful folks it isn't.

  • Mobile.me AND .mac-account on two machines - sync iphone.

    Hi,
    i have a .mac account for work (where i purchased music i needed for work) and a private mobile.me account, which i use for buying my private music. Whenever i connect the iphone to one on these two machines it gets the account id from that computer.
    The problem now is this. I purchased some apps from the appstore for account A and some apps for account B. So far no problem, i can use all these apps on my iphone. BUT: Occasionally the app store finds some updates for installed apps, which i would like to load. But if the app was bought using account A i cannot update this app, when the iphone thinks it is synced to account B - and vice versa. There is an error message saying, you have to buy the original software first to get the update. Thats what i did, but with the wrong account.
    So my question: Can i use the iphone with two accounts? I payed for the apps, so there is no reason i cannot updtae them, when i´m allowed to use them. Or, the option i would NOT like to go: Can i merge these two accounts?
    Thanks
    Rainer

    Authorize both computers for one iTunes account. You should only be syncing with one iTunes account at a time, by using 2 you risk having everything wiped each time you sync with another computer with a different account. You can setup several mobileme accounts, but you should only use one iTunes account for purchases on the iPhone to avoid problems like this.
    Message was edited by: Randy Fast

  • Aperture library sync over two machines?

    Is there a way to sync aperture libraries over two machines on a LAN?
    I am going to try aperture but I am not sure which machine to install it on.
    I have a mac pro and a mac mini which I run side by side. I use my mac mini for email, and iphoto, iPad syncing and music and my mac pro as my main work machine for music production.
    Ideally I would like to install it on the mac pro where I get the extra power and screen real estate but then I do not want to miss out on not having photos on the iPad. As the iPad syncs with my mac mini, I am torn between the two.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on this matter?
    It woudl be much appreciated.
    Regards,
    Felix

    And that works fine unless you need both machines to have the library at the same time.
    And it wasn't my point it was the OP's
    From the first post:
    I have a mac pro and a mac mini which I run side by side. I use my mac mini for email, and iphoto, iPad syncing and music and my mac pro as my main work machine for music production.
    So for the orignal specs both machines required a copy of the library. 
    Let's say in the middle of working on the Aperture library on the MacPro he needs to email an image to someone. Aperture will have to be shutdown, the disk unmounted and carried over to/cabled into the Mini. Just to send an email. Seems a lot easier to just have a copy of the library on the mini. The library on the Mini could even be a stripped down copy, no masters just the previews this way it makes it impossible to make changes on the Mini to images if that is a concern.
    regards

Maybe you are looking for