Kernel Task 350 % CPU usage...

Hey guys... ive a big problem with my macbook pro 13 eary 2011...
since yesterday evening its very very slow and my fans are allways at 100% fan speed...
my problem is that it start directly after the start...
i turn on my macbook and my fans go full power and my macbook is slown down...
what did i try..
smc reset by clicking (left) + alt+ctrl+shift and powerbutton... nothing happened...
reinstalled my mac osx 10.7 (needed 3 hours for installation)
do u have some tips for me? i dont know anymore...
in the first moment ive watched series and then ... fans full speed and slowing down...

The kernel is using excessive processor cycles. Below is a partial list of causes for this condition.
Throttling
When it gets high temperature readings from the hardware, or a low-voltage reading from the battery, the kernel may try to compensate by interrupting the processor(s) to slow them down and reduce power consumption. This condition can be due to a buildup of dust on the logic board, to high ambient temperature, to a worn-out or faulty battery, or to the malfunction of a cooling fan or sensor. Note that if the problem is caused by a sensor, there may be no actual overheating or undervoltage.
If the computer is portable, test with and without the AC adapter connected. If kernel_task hogs the processor only on battery power, the fault is in the battery or the logic board.
The Apple Hardware Test, though not very reliable, is sometimes able to detect a bad fan or sensor.
Installed software
User-installed software that includes a device driver or other kernel code may thrash the kernel. Some system-monitoring applications, such as "iStat," can also contribute to the problem. You can test for this possibility by completely disabling or removing the software according to the developer's instructions, or booting in safe mode. Note, however, that disabling a system modification without removing it or booting in safe mode may not be as easy as you think it is.
Corrupt NVRAM or SMC data
Sometimes the problem is cleared up by resetting the NVRAM or the SMC.
Peripherals
According to at least one report, connecting an external display to a MacBook Pro via a Thunderbolt-to-DVI adapter may cause this issue. I can't confirm.
Encryption
Transferring large amounts of data to or from an encrypted disk image or FileVault volume may put an extra load on the kernel. If both the source and the destination are encrypted, the load may be doubled. If you transfer data from an encrypted disk image on an encrypted partition to another such image on another encrypted partition, the load may be quadrupled.
This issue probably doesn't affect late-model Macs with an Intel i-series, recent Xeon, or later processor. Those processors support hardware-accelerated encryption. You can determine what kind of processor you have by selecting About This Mac from the Apple menu in the menu bar.

Similar Messages

  • Kernel task high CPU usage?

    So I noticed my macbook pro (17" 2011, 16GB RAM) running slow, especially graphics.  opened up the activity monitor, and lo and behold there is something using 283% of my CPU: kernel_task.  Before I even ask how this is possible, what is kernel task, and could this be responsible for my sluggish machine?
    I did notice a week ago that google chrome is allowing many pop up windows with messages trying to get me to download system checks and other nonsense... Not sure if this is related but that's annoying too. 
    Any ideas? 
    Thanks

    ALso, restarting does nothing to alter this slow state it seems.  Restarted twice with no improvement

  • File copy results in kernel task high CPU usage

    Macbook Pro
    MacBook Pro
      Model Identifier:          MacBookPro6,1
      Processor Name:          Intel Core i5
      Processor Speed:          2.53 GHz
    2010 year model.
    Snow Leopard 10.6.7
    Copying files over the network, or via external Firewire 800 harddrive invariably results in rather hight cpu utilization for kernel task process. The number are in the range of 15-20% in the Acivity Monitor. To compare, iMac 27", 2009, full speed FireWire bus file copy at 80 mb/sec makes only 2-3% kernel task CPU use. Why is Macbook pro so much worse? Is it due to chipset limitations, or what?

    Just now I have been copying some movie files over Gigabit local area network, the data received per second is up to 55 mb, and kernel task consumes 50% or more of CPU. The same task on iMac or on Windows based computer does not tax the CPU in any way, since it is handled properly by network adapter I suppose. So what is wrong with 2010 Macbook Pro?

  • How could i get the kernel and user cpu usage for each process

    Hi all,
    In order to monitor the system CPU usage, I would like write a script to gather the kernel and user CPU usage for each process, like the prstat or top does. As always missing the shortlived kernel usage, prstat or top cann't get the precise CPU usage. I checked with the dtrace syscall, proc and fbt provider, but don't get which one is useful.
    Please provide your comments and suggestion.
    Thanks in adv

    mail2sleepy wrote:
    As I've studied the "dtrace" for a while, and seems Sun gives a pretty high score on this new feature.....I do want to know whether there's some probe can work for it, like writing a "dtrace" version prstat.You can write a prstat without dtrace. Because that's just polling at specific intervals and reading some process structures from /proc. You could have dtrace fire a probe every 5 seconds and read the same thing, but it wouldn't really be using any features of dtrace. Trhying to write it "in dtrace" doesn't make much sense.
    What you could do that would be harder via other methods is to fire a probe at process exit that displayed the process information including total CPU time. They could print exactly when processes exited. Doing that without dtrace would be very difficult.
    Darren

  • Kernel task 300% CPU and sleep problem

    MacBook Air 13-inch, Early 2014, ПО  OS X 10.9.5 (13F34)
    The system seems overloaded, big delays on keyboard typing. Activity Monitor shows kernel_task consume 300-400% of CPU, but otherwise system does not look as overloaded - laptop is not hot
    and fan silent.
    Also there is problems with system wakeup. It is impossible to wakeup system after closing the lid for more then 20 seconds, it turns off.
    I think you have to add battery info.
    Информация о модели:
      Серийный номер: D8641061KJ3F90KAU
      Производитель: SMP
      Имя устройства: bq20z451
      Pack Lot Code: 0
      PCB Lot Code: 0
      Версия прошивки: 511
      Версия аппаратного обеспечения: 000a
      Версия батареи: 1200
      Информация о заряде:
      Оставшийся заряд (мА·ч): 7282
      Полностью заряжен: Да
      Идет зарядка: Нет
      Полная емкость заряда (мА·ч): 7282
      Информация о степени исправности:
      Количество циклов перезарядки: 43
      Состояние: Обычный
      Установлен аккумулятор: Да
      Ток (мА): 0
      Напряжение (мВ): 8539

    In safe mode the problem does not go away. Actual overheating the computer does not have, it is cold. The problem is with the power on and without. All programs are not included in the basic package, I removed. I also tried to reinstall the OS with the protection of personal data. The problem exist. The problem may be due to high humidity? I live in Sri Lanka. And there is a problem with sleep mode.
    "Also there is problems with system wakeup. It is impossible to wakeup system after closing the lid for more then 20 seconds, it turns off."

  • Kernel Task RAM Usage

    I'm just wondering what's up with the RAM usage on my macbook. Right when I start up 500MB of RAM is being used (wired and active), 100MB of it being the kernel task. After a typical session of use, I close all programs and find that the RAM usage is about 800MB and the kernel task is using 250MB. Just wondering why the kernel task's RAM usage creeps up like that and doesn't go back down. It's just a little perplexing to have the same exact programs running and be down 300MB of free RAM.

    I was having the same problem and looked into it, this may help:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11084568&#11084568

  • High CPU Usage With 2.6.32

    Hi
    Ever since the kernel update my CPU usage has its own will. Would it normally stay under 10%, does it now ad 20% while only moving a window around. (nothing else open) Scrolling up and down got me to 95%! (with firefox 1 tab open/nothing else open) And as you can imagine this is getting annoying. Is there a solution? Someone who could help me?
    I have Openbox as a WM. No DE.  /usr/bin/X -nolisten tcp uses almost always around 5% with tops to 40%.
    The problem occurs with my Acer Extensa 5230.
    Processor
    Intel® Celeron® Processor 900
    (1MB L2 cache, 2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
    Chipset
    Mobile Intel® GL40 Express
    Any more information? Logs? Errorfiles?

    Hi Klaus1
    I have several plug-ins by cfx and the slick volumes 4, 6 8 and 10. I can post a list of all of them if you like. Up to now they never made any trouble, but you'll never know...
    The edit in the timeline is about 25 minutes long. But the project file contains captured dv-footage of about 2 hours, so that alone adds up to something like 26 GB. Then there are a few rendered effect-clips done with some of the plug-ins like stabilizing or color correction which also add to the 30 GB, as well as some audio-files (some music, my voice-over commentary). I emptied the trash several times while working on the movie. At this moment there are only a few MB of erased audio in it.
    It all sounds a bit like this is an insanely huge and complex project, but as i said, i have done projects like this in imovie without the massive cpu-usage. I'd like to continue to use imovie, but if this problem keeps coming up with future projects, i might as well take the step and switch to Final Cut Express.
    For now I will try your idea of exporting the movie as it is now and open it in a new project file.
    Thanks for your help and input so far!

  • A Projector with minimal CPU usage?

    How do i make a Projector with minimal CPU usage?
    Windows XP Pro SP3.
    Director 11.5.
    Using Windos Task Manager - CPU Usage History. I like to use less then 5%.

    www.director-online.com - Ending CPU Hogging in Director
    http://www.director-online.com/buildArticle.php?id=1122
    UIHelper.x32 - xtra UiHelper
    *sleep int timeInMs                                         -- make this process sleep a while
    on idle
      sleep 1
    end

  • Recently FireFox often has been causing 100% CPU usage and locks up until it finishes the process (various ones). Clearing cookies/cache didn't help. Any ideas?

    Windows 2000 SP4, 1g RAM, Firefox 9.0.1
    We keep IE6 and Firefox open simultaneously for 2 different mail accounts. Firefox was always much faster even with 3 or 4 tabs open, but for the past couple of weeks when trying to update a screen the CPU suddenly goes to 100% usage and of course nothing will move until the particular process is finished. Closing one or more tabs does not help. If I close Firefox completely with Task Manager CPU usage goes back down to nil. After restarting Firefox CPU usage may or may not go back up depending upon whether it tries to continue the previous task that was locking it up.
    It did not do this with Firefox 3.6 but then again it didn't happen immediately after updating to 9.0.1 either.

    100% CPU usage occurred most often toward the end of the working day when busy trying to print on-line postage. We don't have any memory-consuming plugins but according to the knowledge base articles Firefox memory usage can gradually increase during the day even if you do nothing. It seems that may be the problem so we close and restart Firefox more often now as that usually fixes the problem. However, if we get stuck on a particular website update that causes the CPU to to go 100%, we can always start Firefox without previous tabs so the update will stop, or simply use a different browser until we have time to let the computer play games with itself.
    So our workaround of restarting Firefox turns out to be the final solution (until we find something better - will post it if we do). Vic

  • High CPU usage on MaxDb instance

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a system showing high load on the CPU :
    top - 00:05:05 up 311 days, 13:03,  9 users,  load average: 50.72, 127.39, 110.54
    Tasks: 500 total,   1 running, 499 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
    Cpu(s):  0.3%us,  0.3%sy,  0.0%ni, 64.8%id, 34.3%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.3%st
    Mem:     49160M total,    48507M used,      652M free,      149M buffers
    Swap:    20479M total,     1940M used,    18539M free,     3548M cached
    I checked everything and noticed shared memory error in the dbmsrv file
    Can anyone let me know if the shared memory could be a cause in the high load?
    Or do I need to do any other basic checks?
    Any help would be appreciated
    Below is the output of 'x_cons HPT show active :
    ID   UKT UNIX   TASK       APPL Current        Timeout/ Region     Wait
              tid   type        pid state          Priority cnt try    item
    T2     2  18679 Logwr           Vector IO               9               124866639(r)
    T68   12  18689 User     23028* LogIOwait(234)  1       0     68        784358517(r)
    T71   13  18690 User     23710* Vwait                   0               909589452(s)
    T78   17  18694 User      3024* LogIOwait(234)          0               906420743(r)
    T79    9  18686 User     27748* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068811(r)
    T90   11  18688 User     28215* Vwait                   0               845220668(r)
    T95    8  18685 User     32328* LogIOwait(234) !        0               804631101(r)
    T114  16  18693 User     20711**Command wait         no 0               888322907(r)
    T117  13  18690 User     18944* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589452(s)
    T120  13  18690 User     28175* Vwait                   0               909589452(s)
    T141  18  18695 User      5611* Vwait                   0               890340046(s)
    T149   9  18686 User     29715* Connect close           5               750068811(r)
    T320  16  18693 User     20068* Vwait                   0               888322907(r)
    T369   9  18686 User     28212* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068811(r)
    T370  10  18687 User      3699* LogIOwait(234) !        0               745931359(s)
    T378  11  18688 User     28206* Vwait                   0               845220668(r)
    T454  18  18695 User     27238* IO Wait (R)    !        0     51        890340046(s)
    T456  10  18687 User      3129* LogIOwait(234)          0               745931359(s)
    T457   9  18686 User     29232* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068811(r)
    T461  18  18695 User     28223* IOWait(R)(041)          0               890340046(s)
    T463  12  18689 User     28177* Vector IO               0               784358517(r)
    T470  10  18687 User     11683* LogIOwait(234)          0               745931359(s)
    T473   8  18685 User     16966* Vwait                   0               804631101(r)
    T482  13  18690 User     13975* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589452(s)
    T489  16  18693 User     28232**Command wait         no 0            51 888322907(r)
    T497  11  18688 User     18937* Connect close           17              845220668(r)
    T500  11  18688 User     28207* Enter ShareLck          0    SQL_SessionList  1 (w) 845220668(r)
    T503  10  18687 User     30325* LogIOwait(234)          0               745931397(s)
    T505  16  18693 User     28221**Command wait         no 0               888322907(r)
    T577  15  18692 User      1940* Connect close  !        17              898282814(r)
    T582  11  18688 User     13480* LogIOwait(234)          0               845220668(r)
    T585  18  18695 User      1560* LogIOwait(234) !        0               890340051(s)
    T590  18  18695 User     20116* LogIOwait(234)          0               890340051(s)
    T594   9  18686 User      5409* LogIOwait(234) !        0               750068816(s)
    T624   9  18686 User      1225* Vwait                   0               750068816(s)
    T639  16  18693 User     28253* LogIOwait(234)          0               888322907(r)
    T658  13  18690 User      3719* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589453(s)
    T663   9  18686 User     28247* Vwait                   0               750068816(s)
    T687  16  18693 User     27614* LogIOwait(234) !        0               888322907(r)
    T715  12  18689 User      4077* Vwait                   0               784358517(r)
    T724   8  18685 User     23921* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631101(r)
    T727  13  18690 User     31523* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589453(s)
    T731  12  18689 User     28205* Vwait                   0               784358517(r)
    T745  18  18695 User     27608* LogIOwait(234) !        0               890340051(s)
    T748   9  18686 User     17691* Vwait                   0               750068816(s)
    T754  16  18693 User     11312**Command wait         no 0               888322907(r)
    T759  16  18693 User      1514**LogIOwait(234)        5 0               888322907(r)
    T761  15  18692 User     27641* LogIOwait(234) !        0               898282814(r)
    T766  11  18688 User      3745* LogIOwait(234)          0               845220668(r)
    T771   9  18686 User     23176* Vwait                   0               750068816(s)
    T777   9  18686 User     30883* Vwait                   0               750068816(s)
    T781  18  18695 User     22235* LogIOwait(234) !        0               890340051(s)
    T787  17  18694 User      5980* Connect close           5               906420743(r)
    T790   8  18685 User      5420* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631101(r)
    T813  17  18694 User      2476* LogIOwait(234) !        0               906420743(r)
    T823  14  18691 User       309**Enter ShareLck        7 0    SQL_SessionList  1 (w) 902276702(r)
    T832   8  18685 User     20739* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631101(r)
    T845  13  18690 User     24777* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589453(s)
    T850  13  18690 User     30893* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589453(s)
    T853  14  18691 User     28194* Vwait                   0               902276702(r)
    T858   8  18685 User     23512* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631101(r)
    T861  14  18691 User     20739* Vwait                   0               902276702(r)
    T865  18  18695 User     23706* Vwait                   0               890340052(s)
    T868  12  18689 User     20733* LogIOwait(234)          0               784358517(r)
    T874  11  18688 User     28239* LogIOwait(234)          0               845220668(r)
    T888  18  18695 User     22080* IOWait(R)(041)          0               890340052(s)
    T894  13  18690 User     12231* Enter ShareLck          0    SQL_SessionList  1 (w) 909589453(s)
    T895  17  18694 User      2578* Vwait          !        0               906420767(s)
    T944  16  18693 User     23704* LogIOwait(234)          0               888322916(r)
    T951  10  18687 User      5932* Vwait                   0               745931493(s)
    T953  10  18687 User     28252* Vwait                   0               745931493(s)
    T961  14  18691 User     28154* Running                 296             902276747(r)
    T972  10  18687 User     23711* Vwait                   0               745931493(s)
    T975  16  18693 User     22238* LogIOwait(234)          0               888322916(r)
    T980  11  18688 User      2907* Vwait                   0               845220677(s)
    T989  14  18691 User     23714* LogIOwait(234)          0               902276747(r)
    T1009  13  18690 User      9270* LogIOwait(234)          0               909589459(s)
    T1010  15  18692 User      6137* LogIOwait(234)          0               898282825(s)
    T1023  10  18687 User     28180* LogIOwait(234)          0               745931493(s)
    T1041  15  18692 User     16138* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1047   9  18686 User     28161* Vwait                   0               750068824(s)
    T1067  18  18695 User     28168* IOWait(R)(041)          0               890340099(s)
    T1068  15  18692 User     12678* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1070  10  18687 User     18967* LogIOwait(234) !        0               745931493(s)
    T1084   9  18686 User     16135* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068824(s)
    T1100  10  18687 User     11196* LogIOwait(234)          0               745931493(s)
    T1114  13  18690 User      1972* Vwait                   0               909589459(s)
    T1134  15  18692 User     28225* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1138  13  18690 User     23709* Vwait                   0               909589459(s)
    T1163  13  18690 User     28200* IO Wait (R)             0     16        909589459(s)
    T1166   8  18685 User     28188* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631119(s)
    T1199  18  18695 User     22297* Vwait                   0               890340099(s)
    T1211  17  18694 User     31118* Vwait                   0               906420767(s)
    T1240  17  18694 User     12901* LogIOwait(234)          0               906420767(s)
    T1265   9  18686 User     14086* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068824(s)
    T1286  15  18692 User     28230* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1313  15  18692 User     28220* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1314  16  18693 User     14699* LogIOwait(234)          0               888322916(r)
    T1316  15  18692 User     28155* LogIOwait(234)          0               898282825(s)
    T1342  12  18689 User     28222* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1344  17  18694 User      1557* LogIOwait(234) !        0               906420767(s)
    T1365  18  18695 User     28234* Vwait                   0               890340099(s)
    T1370  17  18694 User     28236* Vwait                   0               906420767(s)
    T1376  12  18689 User     28158* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1378  11  18688 User     10397* Vwait                   0               845220677(s)
    T1384   8  18685 User     28245* Vwait                   0               804631119(s)
    T1420  14  18691 User     24592* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T1440  11  18688 User     22960* LogIOwait(234)          0               845220677(s)
    T1463   9  18686 User     28185* Vwait                   0               750068824(s)
    T1471  11  18688 User     27611* Vwait                   0               845220677(s)
    T1496   8  18685 User     31179* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631119(s)
    T1501  12  18689 User     28973* LogIOwait(234)          0               784358541(s)
    T1517  14  18691 User     23708* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T1524  16  18693 User     28151* Vwait                   0               888322916(r)
    T1547  10  18687 User     28216* IO Wait (R)             0      5        745931493(s)
    T1558  15  18692 User     15863* LogIOwait(234)          0               898282825(s)
    T1593  12  18689 User     22513* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1597  12  18689 User     12902* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1601   9  18686 User     23173* LogIOwait(234) !        0               750068824(s)
    T1604   8  18685 User     31556* Vwait                   0               804631119(s)
    T1612  10  18687 User      1281* LogIOwait(234) !        0               745931493(s)
    T1646  14  18691 User      4260* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T1649  10  18687 User     23862* Vwait                   0               745931493(s)
    T1664   8  18685 User     32197* Vwait                   0               804631119(s)
    T1666  16  18693 User     23735* LogIOwait(234)          0               888322916(r)
    T1676  12  18689 User     15167* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1680  18  18695 User     22282* Vwait                   0               890340099(s)
    T1683   9  18686 User      3034* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068824(s)
    T1686   9  18686 User     23364* Vwait                   0               750068824(s)
    T1696  17  18694 User     28244* Vector IO               0               906420767(s)
    T1709  14  18691 User     15351* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T1733  18  18695 User     30535* IOWait(R)(041)          0               890340099(s)
    T1735  11  18688 User     28179* LogIOwait(234)          0               845220677(s)
    T1738  18  18695 User     22187* LogIOwait(234)          0               890340099(s)
    T1740  14  18691 User     28160* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T1779  16  18693 User     22606* Vwait                   0               888322916(r)
    T1843  12  18689 User     28224* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1849  15  18692 User     23707* LogIOwait(234)          0               898282825(s)
    T1859  10  18687 User     28197* IOWait(R)(041)          0               745931493(s)
    T1874  16  18693 User     28951* Vwait                   0               888322916(r)
    T1887   9  18686 User     29220* LogIOwait(234) !        0               750068824(s)
    T1913  15  18692 User      5598* Vwait                   0               898282825(s)
    T1918   9  18686 User      9654* Vwait                   0               750068824(s)
    T1924  17  18694 User     24524* Vwait                   0               906420767(s)
    T1950   8  18685 User     16727* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631119(s)
    T1953  12  18689 User     10400* Vwait                   0               784358541(s)
    T1964   8  18685 User     23729* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631119(s)
    T1967  18  18695 User     31693* Vwait                   0               890340099(s)
    T1992  16  18693 User     28184* Vwait                   0               888322916(r)
    T1998  16  18693 User      5737* Vwait                   0               888322916(r)
    T2003  14  18691 User     28204* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T2008   9  18686 User     28240* LogIOwait(234)          0               750068824(s)
    T2012  10  18687 User     28241* Vwait                   0               745931493(s)
    T2014  14  18691 User     20680* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    T2018   4  18681 PrefLOB         Vector IO               0               325778572(s)
    T2019   4  18681 PrefLOB         Vector IO               0               325778572(s)
    T2221   4  18681 Savepnt         IO Wait (W)             0     14        325778572(s)
    T2222   4  18681 AutoLgW         Vsuspend (204)          0               325778572(s)
    T2223   4  18681 AutoLgR         Vector IO               0               325778572(s)
    Regards,
    Vinay

    Hi Vinay,
    the x_cons output does not show any user tasks with CPU usage. There are all in some kind of wait situation. It really looks strange.
    We have a lot of User Tasks in status VWAIT ->
    T2014  14  18691 User     20680* Vwait                   0               902276747(r)
    -> vwait means that the Task requested a SQL lock but could not get this lock because it ia already locked by another task. The task has to wait -> Please check the SDQL LockSituation.
    Then I see a lot of Tasks in LOGIOWAIT
    T1166   8  18685 User     28188* LogIOwait(234)          0               804631119(s)
    There are as well in a wait situation - write Log to disk - the reason for the suspent is no: 234
    If you run x_cvons show supend you will get a list of Wiat situations ->
    Which string do you get for 234
    We see as well that you already tried to cancel or kill some of the Tasks -> see the '!'
    T895  17  18694 User      2578* Vwait          !        0               906420767(s)
    We have also read wait situation on the log - looks like a rollback is curerntly active as well.
    If this is a SAP system I would recommend to open a SAP ticket to check the system directly.
    Regards, Christiane

  • Kernel Task over 400% CPU usage

    Hello, I have some questions about the Kernel Task in my activity monitor.
    Recently, after a hard disk failure, I have my Macbook Pro wiped and start afresh with Mavericks. All was well, but it slowed down tremendously in the last couple of days. I checked the activity monitor and Kernel Task is always around 400-470%, sometimes it even peaked to 1000+%! I closed all my applications but it is still taking up all my RAM. I cannot work when it is freezing up every 2 seconds. What is the problem?
    Here is the report, if it helps:
    EtreCheck version: 1.9.12 (48)
    Report generated 3 August 2014 12:38:14 BST
    Hardware Information:
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro8,1
      1 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 2 cores
      4 GB RAM
    Video Information:
      Intel HD Graphics 3000 - VRAM: 384 MB
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software:
      OS X 10.9.4 (13E28) - Uptime: 1 day 8:2:57
    Disk Information:
      WDC WD5000LPVX-00V0TT0 disk0 : (500.11 GB)
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.25 GB (121.06 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
      HL-DT-ST DVDRW  GS31N 
    USB Information:
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Inc. BRCM2070 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
    Thunderbolt Information:
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper:
      Anywhere
    Kernel Extensions:
      [not loaded] com.m-audio.driver.firewire.dice (2.4.2 - SDK 10.6) Support
    Launch Daemons:
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
    Launch Agents:
      [running] com.maudio.profire.helper.plist Support
    User Launch Agents:
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
    User Login Items:
      iTunesHelper
      Google Drive
    Internet Plug-ins:
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 14.0.0.145 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Flash Player: Version: 14.0.0.145 - SDK 10.6 Support
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
      Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
    Safari Extensions:
      Searchme: Version: 1.3
    Audio Plug-ins:
      BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
      AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
      AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
      iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
      Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
      Flash Player  Support
      PreferencesPane  Support
    Time Machine:
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU:
          11% Disk Utility
          11% repair_packages
          7% helpd
          5% WindowServer
          3% hidd
    Top Processes by Memory:
      233 MB Finder
      66 MB mds_stores
      49 MB WindowServer
      37 MB mds
      34 MB Disk Utility
    Virtual Memory Information:
      1.22 GB Free RAM
      1.35 GB Active RAM
      394 MB Inactive RAM
      1017 MB Wired RAM
      1.50 GB Page-ins
      100 MB Page-outs

    The kernel is using excessive processor cycles. Below are some possible causes for the condition.
    Throttling
    When it gets high temperature readings from the hardware, or a low-voltage reading from the battery, the kernel may try to compensate by interrupting the processor(s) to slow them down and reduce power consumption. This condition can be due to:
    ☞ a buildup of dust on the logic board
    ☞ high ambient temperature
    ☞ a worn-out or faulty battery in a portable
    ☞ the malfunction of a cooling fan, a temperature sensor, a voltage sensor, or some other internal component
    Note that if the problem is caused by a sensor, there may be no actual overheating or undervoltage.
    If the computer is portable, test with and without the AC adapter connected. If kernel_task hogs the processor only on battery power, the fault is in the battery or the logic board. If it happens only on AC power, charging is causing the machine to heat up. That may be normal on some models. CPU usage should drop when charging is complete.
    Apple Diagnostics or the Apple Hardware Test, though not very reliable, is sometimes able to detect a fault. For more thorough hardware testing, make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store, or go to another authorized service provider.
    If nothing is wrong with the hardware, then whatever you can do to improve cooling may help.
    Installed software
    User-installed software that includes a device driver or other kernel code may thrash the kernel. That category includes virtualization software, such as Parallels and VMware, as well as most commercial "anti-virus" products. Some system-monitoring applications, such as "iStat," can also contribute to the problem. You can test for this possibility by completely disabling or removing the software according to the developer's instructions, or starting in safe mode. Note, however, that disabling a system modification without removing it or testing in safe mode may not be as easy as you think.
    Corrupt NVRAM or SMC data
    Sometimes the problem is cleared up by resetting the NVRAM or the SMC.
    External display
    Connecting an external LCD display to some MacBook Pro models while the lid is open may cause this issue. If applicable, test by closing the lid or disconnecting the display. You might get better results with a newer LED display.

  • Kernel task is hogging lots of threads and CPU time

    My Mavericks Quad Macbook Pro is getting pretty slow these days and at some point I'll have to reinstall everything I think. However I can't start that for a while as I have important projects on the go. I looked in Activity Monitor first and I can see a kernel task constantly running with no indication of what it is doing. So I opened Console and looked at the Diagnostic log. I can see a lot of lines referring to com.apple.message. Hundreds of identical lines actually. I did not have Messages running so I opened it, and sure enough that showed up in console live. However the log shows a slightly different app and a totally different UUID, which seems odd.
    Anybody understand what this is all about? See below. I opened one of the endlessly repeating items plus one that I know is from the Messages app below it.
    23/03/2015 08:28:29.242 UserEventAgent[235]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.usage.app_activetime
    com.apple.message.signature: universalAccessAuthWarn
    com.apple.message.signature2: com.apple.accessibility.universalAccessAuthWarn ||| 1.0 (190.1)
    com.apple.message.value: 633
    com.apple.message.value2: 0
    com.apple.message.value3: 0
    com.apple.message.value4: 0
    com.apple.message.value5: 0
    com.apple.message.value6: 0
    com.apple.message.value7: 0
    com.apple.message.result: NO
    com.apple.message.summarize: YES
    Sender_Mach_UUID: 55428B1C-9198-32BF-80EA-4731081F402E
    23/03/2015 08:44:17.426 Messages[8722]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.iChat.app.weeklyStats
    com.apple.message.video_chat_passed: 0
    com.apple.message.video_chat_failed: 0
    com.apple.message.video_chat_noop: 0
    com.apple.message.audio_chat_passed: 0
    com.apple.message.audio_chat_failed: 0
    com.apple.message.audio_chat_noop: 0
    com.apple.message.screen_sharing_passed: 0
    com.apple.message.screen_sharing_failed: 0
    com.apple.message.screen_sharing_noop: 0
    com.apple.message.average_message_length: 0.000000
    com.apple.message.messages_sent: 0
    com.apple.message.messages_received: 0
    com.apple.message.sms_sent: 0
    com.apple.message.sms_menu_used: User never selected SMS menu
    com.apple.message.result: pass
    com.apple.message.imessage_offered_upgrades: 0
    com.apple.message.imessage_upgrades: 0
    com.apple.message.imessage_declines: 0
    com.apple.message.imessages_sent: 0
    com.apple.message.imessages_received: 0
    Sender_Mach_UUID: 212E34A8-B310-3729-8D11-879E9985A0BD
    23/03/2015 08:44:17.427 Messages[8722]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.iChat.app.servicesUsedThisWeek
    com.apple.message.aim: 0
    com.apple.message.bonjour: 0
    com.apple.message.yahoo: 0
    com.apple.message.jabber: 0
    com.apple.message.google_talk: 0
    com.apple.message.imessage: 1
    com.apple.message.other: 0
    com.apple.message.result: pass
    Sender_Mach_UUID: 212E34A8-B310-3729-8D11-879E9985A0BD
    23/03/2015 08:44:32.607 Messages[8722]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.iChat.app.prefs
    com.apple.message.one_on_one_style: com.apple.iChat.Styles.Balloons-ShowPictures
    com.apple.message.group_style: com.apple.iChat.Styles.Balloons-ShowPictures
    com.apple.message.incoming_bg_color: Automatic
    com.apple.message.outgoing_bg_color: Automatic
    com.apple.message.incoming_font: Default 12.000000
    com.apple.message.outgoing_font: Default 12.000000
    com.apple.message.save_history: Don't Save
    Sender_Mach_UUID: 212E34A8-B310-3729-8D11-879E9985A0BD

    The kernel_task is the heart of the operating system.  It will have on the order of a 100 threads (more or less).  So when you ask the operating system to do something, like read/write a disk, do network I/O, talk to your mouse/trackpad, keyboard, monitor, etc... kernel_task is the code that is going to do that at the lowest levels.
    Also if you have installed any 3rd party drivers (kernel extensions), they are going to become part of kernel_task and the CPU time they use will be part of kernel_task.
    If you have anti-malware, Mac cleaner or memory cleaner software installed, many of these packages install drivers that then try to out-guess the kernel_task and often result in slowing down the system, interfering with the normal operation of the system, or causing kernel panics.  These kinds of packages are not recommended by long term forum contributors.
    Please provide the output from EtreCheck, which will show the 3rd party additions you have installed.
    <https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6174>

  • My kernel task is using 400% of my CPU

    My coMputer is very slow, i need help. I saw the kernel task and  is using yhe 400% of my CPU.
    Hardware Information:
              MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012)
              MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
              1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2 cores
              4 GB RAM
    Video Information:
              Intel HD Graphics 4000 - VRAM: 1024 MB
    System Software:
              OS X 10.9.2 (13C64) - Uptime: 0 days 0:5:35
    Disk Information:
              APPLE HDD HTS547550A9E384 disk0 : (500.11 GB)
                        EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
                        MacBokk Pro CJ4LV4R3z (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.25 GB (473.36 GB free)
                        Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
              MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-8A8 
    USB Information:
              Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
              Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
                        Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
              Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
              Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
    FireWire Information:
    Thunderbolt Information:
              Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Launch Daemons:
              [System] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist 3rd-Party support link
    User Login Items:
              iTunesHelper
    Internet Plug-ins:
              FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 12.0.0.77 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
              Flash Player: Version: 12.0.0.77 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
              QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
              Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
    Audio Plug-ins:
              BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
              AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
              AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
              iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
              Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
              Flash Player  3rd-Party support link
    Old Applications:
              None
    Time Machine:
              Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU:
                  18%          com.apple.WebKit.Networking
                  13%          syncdefaultsd
                   7%          WindowServer
                   5%          com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
                   4%          mdworker
    Top Processes by Memory:
              98 MB          Safari
              94 MB          com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
              33 MB          Dock
              33 MB          WindowServer
              29 MB          EtreCheck
    Virtual Memory Information:
              2.47 GB          Free RAM
              890 MB          Active RAM
              130 MB          Inactive RAM
              543 MB          Wired RAM
              191 MB          Page-ins
              0 B          Page-outs

    The kernel is using excessive processor cycles. Below are some possible causes for the condition.
    Throttling
    When it gets high temperature readings from the hardware, or a low-voltage reading from the battery, the kernel may try to compensate by interrupting the processor(s) to slow them down and reduce power consumption. This condition can be due to
    a buildup of dust on the logic board
    high ambient temperature
    a worn-out or faulty battery in a portable
    the malfunction of a cooling fan, a temperature sensor, a voltage sensor, or some other internal component
    Note that if the problem is caused by a sensor, there may be no actual overheating or undervoltage.
    If the computer is portable, test with and without the AC adapter connected. If kernel_task hogs the processor only on battery power, the fault is in the battery or the logic board. If it happens only on AC power, charging is causing the machine to heat up. That may be normal on some models. CPU usage should drop when charging is complete.
    Apple Diagnostics or the Apple Hardware Test, though not very reliable, is sometimes able to detect a fault. For more thorough hardware testing, make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store, or go to another authorized service provider.
    If nothing is wrong with the hardware, then whatever you can do to improve cooling may help.
    Installed software
    User-installed software that includes a device driver or other kernel code may thrash the kernel. That category includes virtualization software, such as Parallels and VMware, as well as most commercial "anti-virus" products. Some system-monitoring applications, such as "iStat," can also contribute to the problem. You can test for this possibility by completely disabling or removing the software according to the developer's instructions, or starting in safe mode. Note, however, that disabling a system modification without removing it or testing in safe mode may not be as easy as you think.
    Corrupt NVRAM or SMC data
    Sometimes the problem is cleared up by resetting the NVRAM or the SMC.
    External display
    Connecting an external LCD display to some MacBook Pro models may cause this issue. If applicable, test by disconnecting the display. You might get better results with a newer LED display.

  • Kernel.task using 300% of CPU. MacBookAir mid 2013

    Hi
    I have a MacBookAir mid 2013, 13-inch.
    Starting my mac up after sleep to weeks ago, it behaved very strange and has done it since that day. The fan turns on at full speed, and the Kernel.task operation is taking up 300% of the CPU, or in other words the system is constantly using between 65 - 80 % of the memory, hereby making the Mac very slow, and useless to use for anything. Also at the same time the sound disappeared, in the system configuration there is no output audio to select.
    I have tried a lot of things in order to fix this problem, based on things I found in the discussion forum here. I have tried memory cleaner, to remove sound files, to remove plists (as many suggests, but for this MacBookAir6,2.plist, does not exist), I have formatted my hard disk and reinstalled the original OS X system (Mountain Lion), and the upgraded to the current version (Yosimite). But nothing has worked.
    Does anyone having the same problem? Or know how to fix this? Anyone been in contact with Apple related to this problem?
    Best regards
    Morten

    First, get rid of "Memory Cleaner," which is useless at best. Then see below.
    The kernel is using excessive processor cycles. Below are some possible causes for the condition.
    Throttling
    When it gets high temperature readings from the hardware, or low voltage readings from the battery of a MacBook, the kernel may try to compensate by interrupting the processor(s) to slow them down and reduce power consumption. This condition can be due to:
    ☞ a buildup of dust on the logic board
    ☞ high ambient temperature
    ☞ a worn-out or faulty battery in a portable
    ☞ the malfunction of a cooling fan, a temperature sensor, a voltage sensor, or some other internal component
    Note that if the problem is caused by a sensor, there may be no actual overheating or undervoltage.
    If the computer is portable, test with and without the AC adapter connected. If kernel_task hogs the processor only on AC power, charging is causing the machine to heat up. That behavior may be normal for some models. CPU usage should drop when charging is complete.
    Apple Diagnostics or the Apple Hardware Test, though not very reliable, is sometimes able to detect a fault. For more thorough hardware testing, make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store, or go to another authorized service provider.
    If nothing is wrong with the hardware, then whatever you can do to improve cooling may help.
    Installed software
    User-installed software that includes a device driver or other kernel code may thrash the kernel. That category includes virtualization software, such as Parallels and VMware, as well as most commercial "anti-virus" products. Some system-monitoring applications, such as "iStat," can also contribute to the problem. You can test for this possibility by completely disabling or removing the software according to the developer's instructions, or starting in safe mode. Note, however, that disabling a system modification without removing it or testing in safe mode may not be as easy as you think.
    Corrupt NVRAM or SMC data
    Sometimes the problem is cleared up by resetting the NVRAM or the SMC.
    External display
    Connecting an external LCD display to some MacBook Pro models while the lid is open may cause this issue. If applicable, test by closing the lid or disconnecting the display. You might get better results with a newer LED display.

  • Anormal cpu usage with kernel 2.6.17

    Hi,
    After upgrading my kernel, i noticed a strange cpu usage.
    Outpout of top :
    top - 13:34:40 up 34 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.01
    Tasks: 85 total, 1 running, 83 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie
    Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 87.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 11.6%si, 0.0%st
    why 11.6 %si, i nerver see that before the last upgrade.
    Thanks for your help.
    Edit :
    [seb@pingus ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
    cpu family : 6
    model : 8
    model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
    stepping : 1
    cpu MHz : 2075.627
    cache size : 256 KB
    fdiv_bug : no
    hlt_bug : no
    f00f_bug : no
    coma_bug : no
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 1
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
    bogomips : 4152.85

    tomk wrote:
    Does this make any noticeable difference to your PC's performance?
    Just curious.
    For me, yes. As I said in the bug report, my computer is very laggy when the problem exists. I can't stand using it.
    At the moment, I am using custom compiled versions of the 2.6.16 kernel (2.6.16.27, will update to .28 today) and the latest NVIDIA drivers. With this configuration, everything is fine.
    There is the same behaviour with or without nvidia driver.
    Bummer. I guess our problems are different. I experience the slowdown only when using X with the NVIDIA drivers. When X is not running, or I am using the "nv" driver, the problem does not occur.
    - Rpg Cyco

Maybe you are looking for

  • DSL speed slow down after 10.5 upgrade :(

    Hello all, I have a question, and need the Apple cyber-community to help me with this one. I have A.T.& T.'s DSL service. I have a 2WIRE 1701HG router-DSL modem. I HAD 1.2mg download speed 99% of the time with MacOS 10.4.x. Yes I know that it is not

  • OEHR Sample Objects incorrect installation

    Hi, i'm very new in this Apex world, i'm trying to follow the 2 Day + Application Express Developer's Guide (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/pdf/apex_datasheet_20.pdf) , one of the steps is download and install

  • How to display the rows in to columns and columns into rows?

    DES:- I know by using pivot and unpivot you can convert rows into columns and columns into rows but i don't know how to write the syntax?

  • OA FRAME WORK MATERIAL

    Hello friends , I am new to oracle apps field...i didn't have any knowledge about OA Fram work.. Could you please give your valuable suggestions to learn OAF and please provide materials of OAF . Thank you, Durga.

  • E73 Hidden Clock

    So I found this cool clock on my phone that I'd like to use when the phone drops to low power mode or when the screensaver activates. It's only visible on my phone when the keypad is locked and you press and hold the D-pad or optical pad. It's a nice