KM Approval iView without authentication

Hi all,
I´m trying to configure the approval notifications. I already archive to received the email notification but the links inside the email could be better, with better I mean that the link for approve/reject or give feedback should open a page without autentication, I supose that I most change the Service Servlet in the URL Generator service but I don´t know what sould be the correct value (the current value is (/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.service).
Regards,
Orlando Covault

Hi,
I am using SSO with SPNego, but it didn´t work... any ideas beside the apache Idea. And Brad... as far as I could understang all the notes suggest to change the value of URL Generator Service that was my first idea but I don´t know what could be the value in the service servlet.
Regards,
Orlando Covault
Message was edited by:
Orlando Covault

Similar Messages

Macbook Pro won't let me move files to HD without authentication. Also when I try to move files from the HD to the desk it just copies them.

My 2013 Macbook Pro running Mavericks 10.9.5 won't let me move files to the HD without authentication. So I have to keep putting my password in. Also when I try to move files from the HD to the desk it just copies them. This just suddenly happened last night. Anyone have any ideas what it could be? Thanks

See http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1229?viewlocale=en_US - I doubt that it will solve your problem, though. You may want to post on the iPhoto forum - that's where all of the iPhoto experts hang out.
Good luck,
Clinton

How to send an email without authentication

when I use javamail to send an email ,give authentication information seems
a must ,but I need to send it without authentication.Any method that can
implement it?

you can set null for authenticator object.......
look code below, it works......
Properties prop = new Properties()
Session ses = Session.getDefaultInstance(prop,null);

Exclude Managers and others in ECM Planning and Approval Iviews

Hi All,
In the planning iviews, we would like to restrict based one the following conditions,
Manager -Level1 logs in and plans for
1) Employees directly reporting to him(includes managers of sub org units too)
2) And those who come under the sub org unit of the Manager's Org Unit.
for the second point , if the sub org units have Managers of A012 , then those employees should not be displayed(obviously becoz their managers have the rights )
In the Approval Iviews, we would like to restrict based one the following conditions,
Manager -Level 2 logs in and approves
1) The Planning done by Manager Level 1
2) Should not plan for the second level
We have checked the Exclude managers check bos in the rule selection and tried using the HRWPC_EXCL_MANAGERS BADi.
This BAdi would affect other i views where this employee search is used.
Could you suggest ??
Tks & rgds
G

Hi G,
The approval Iview is altogether different. The compensation adjustments eatrlier submitted by the line manager would be automatically available for the Higher / Approving manager and hence there is no question of Employee selection views in approval phase.
And with respect to difference MSS_ECM_SEL_LIS - Employees from org.units and MSS_ECM_SEL_TRE -Employees from org.structure;
Employees from org.units lists the entire list of employees directly from all the subordinate org.units but there is no org.unit reference but
Employees fropm org.structure lists the subordinate org.units first in the data provider and you can select an individual org.unit or all org.units & sleect "GO" button to view the employees list.
Hope this clarifies.
Best Regards
Raj G

Accessing PI WSDL without authentication

Hi,
Is there a setting / configuration that would allow access to a WSDL URL(obtained from Sender Agreement -> Display WSDL) and pull down the WSDL file without authentication?
Thanks & Regards,
Renjith John Andrews

Hello Renjith,
Did you find any way to get SOAP wsdls without authenticaion? Now, I'm looking for the way how to get wsdl without authentication.
Thanks&Regards
Volkan

Send a mail via smtp without authentication

Hello,
I'm developping a web application that reports errors or 'strange situations' to the application'a admin with an e-mail message to the address entered in a sort of wizard. I've read some tutorials and actually I'm able to send mail via smtp only with authentication, withouth i get this error: "530, Address requires authentication". How can i send mails without authentication?

Normally the administrator of those forums is also the administrator of the SMTP server they use, so they configure the server to accept requests from the forum software without authentication.
If you are running your own SMTP server you can do that too. If you are using somebody else's server you will have to follow their rules. You could always contact the administrator and ask whether you could be made exempt from authentication...

Configure SMTP without authentication to share photo by email

I'm not able to share photo by email using a SMTP server without authentication.
Can anyone tell me how to configure an account without authentification?
Regards,
Frederic

Is your Outlook version compatible with Mountain Lion? To be used from other Applications as Mailer it nneds to sandboxed, see this thread.
Re: since update I can not send pitures via outlook or apple mail please help
I do not think, there is a version of Outlook right now, that can be used to mail from Aperture. Use "Mail.app" instead.
I do not know, what may be wrong with Facebook upload. The update to 3.4.1 should have fixed the Facebook access problems.
Regards
Léonie

Security Athorization without authentication - wiill this work? Attn Frank

Hi Frank:
Fun never stops and never know what is coming.
Just when I have my nice tables set up for authentication and authorization,
now I hear that I have to test a scenario where authentication is going to be provided by an external utilty (An LDAP Server behind which PeopleSoft tables have username/pw) info. My questions are:
(1) Is it possible to turn off authentication via J2EE Container but keep Authorization on? I want the ability to use page related security roles! And, yes, there will be a table with usernames and roles as well (which is working).
Change: However, the table with usernames and passwords will be in a PeopleSoft table behind LDAP. (The authentication does work with a few tweaks in web.xml. So, can't complaint there)
(2) Is there a better solution (given the external authentication utility is a given)?
(3) Is there a way to fool JAAS to say, ok don't show the login screen but you are authorized? I now wonder what the DBTableLoginModule do? Can we tell it, "forget authentication, just get the roles?"
I really don't want to lose the authorization provided by JAAS and, not to mention, permissions (which I have not gotten to work but more about that on another post).
Thanks

Hi,
1) as said, nothing prevents you from building a JAAS LoginModule that does what you need - e.g. authenticate a user against LDAP, then connect to the database and query for his/her user roles. You can't have container managed authorization without authentication though.
There will be a change in API in JDeveloper 11 (and most likely in JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 - upcoming) that allows you to set a Subject into the OC4J context, in which case you don't need container managed autehntication. However, I don't have it tested yet and can't tell to what extend this would be useful
3) Sure, you can build a JAAS LoginModule that doesn't care for authentication. However, this doesn't work with container managed security. As far as I am aware, the only option to not show a login dialog is to use certificates. And certificates are not yet to use with custom LoginModules. So the above mentioned API - that is available as a backported patch for 10.1.3.1 - might do the trick
Frank

Can't modify folders without authenticating myself. I am admin. Any ideas?

I can't create a new folder, save a file or move anything to a folder I have in my documents without authenticating it.
I am the only user and am logged in as admin.
Any ideas?
I feel like I am using Windows.

Hi G, and welcome to Apple Discussions.
Run Repair Permissions: Applications>Utilities>Disk Utility>select HD in panel at left>click on Repair Permissions at bottom of main window and allow process to finish before quitting DU.

EP7 Change Password iView without reverting to NW04 UME UI

Hi,
We've just upgraded from EP6 to EP7. Is there any way to activate the old "User Password" iview without having to disable the Web Dynpro UIs (as per SAP note 869852)? We don't want users to change or view their profile, we just want to let them change their password. But we don't want to lose the WD UI for administrators either!
Failing that, is it possible to switch off the other tabs on the User Profile?
I've tried removing the Manage_My_Profile UME action from eu_role and replacing it with just Manage_My_Password, but all the rest of the User Profile is still visible - plus now it gives the misleading warning "You are not authorized to edit your user mapping data" even though they can edit the user mapping with the User Mapping iview...
And how come the User Mapping iview from EP6 still works, but not Change password??
Many thanks & regards
Jane

Neil Malik wrote:>
<snip>
Failing that, is it possible to switch off the other tabs on the User Profile?
</snip>
I had a similar problem with the User Profile screen. We want to let the user have the "User Mapping" tab, but definitely not the ability to edit their own groups or roles.
I have a custom "Every User" role, to which I delta-linked the standard "Portal Personalization" workset. Then I opened the Every User role and clicked Properties. By default, the properties of Manage_All through Manage_Users were all set to No. I set Manage_My_Profile to Yes. This resulted in just 4 tabs displaying when a user clicks Personalize: General Information, Contact Information, Additional Information, and User Mapping for System Access. And when a user clicks the Modify button, any fields that we are pulling from Active Directory via LDAP are greyed out. This sounds similar to what you tried already, but wanted to let you know that you can indeed turn tabs on and off.
Hope this helps!
Karen Ehrich

Launch Leave Approver Application without using UWL

Hi
Feedback from initial UAT has been that the users find the UWL awkward to use and the leave approval process has too many steps. They would be happier if they could get to their list of leave applications requiring approval directly ie avoiding the UWL.
Is this possible? In portal content it is possible to open the Leave Approver iview directly and previewing the iview appears to be OK. However when I add this link into the Navigation in our custom MSS role and access through MSS the same iview appears to be blank.
Is it possible to access this application directly?
Regards

Just as an update we have managed to do this avoinding the UWL and it appears to work fine. Just created a new page with the leaver request approver iview on it. My initial problems with the link from the portal were down to my home page configuration and nothing to do with the fact that you need to use the UWL.
We do intend to use the UWL in the future when more functionality is incorporated, it just seemed overkill for one wrkflow application.

Approval step without capacity ad hoc

Hi,
In some workflows for some users we get the error message when we want to previsualize the approval levels of a Shopping Cart:
"Approval step without capacity ad hoc, prevision impossible"
What is the reason for this error message and how to correct it.
Thanks for any reply,
Aart

Hello Latha,
   This error will not come until you add Ad-hoc approver at last level..for an example.. there are 5 approvers determined by Badi.. You will get this issue when you add Ad-hoc approver after 5th Level of approver then all approver(Including Ad-approver) approved the SC / PO. Here is the solution for this issue.
write the code in your Badi after you appended the approval_table.
    data : lv_index type i.
    describe table approval_table lines lv_index.
     if actual_approval_index gt lv_index.
     no_further_approval_needed = 'X'.
     endif.
please let me know if you need anything help.
John.

Approval step without ad-hoc capability

Hi
In the approval preview section of SC, the message 'approval step without adhoc capability, no preview possible' is displayed. The approvers are being shown in the preview.
What could be reason for this?
Thanks
Rajeev

Hi,
Which SRM version are you using??Please see if the foll notes help:
903200     Note for approval status not getting updated
910612     additional note fro SC approval BADI's and WF's
649551     Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
690716     Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
930750     restart of classic WF's(issue is with Support pack 9)
525577     Approval Preview - Details for approver not displayed.
Note 999528 - Adding Ad Hoc Approver fails due to comit error
Note 952108 - Incorrect error message when approvers are entered
Note 809157 - BBPPREVIEW: Error "Value too large" as of fourth approver
Note 994735 - All BAdI workflows: ApprovalIndex does not begin with 1
Note 924064 - FM BBP_WFL_DIN_FILL_APPROVER: Approvers may be incorrect
Note 983128 - Approval WF Fragment Has No User Assignment
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Approval step without ad-hoc capability. No preview possible

In both SC and PO WF, the approval preview shows the text :" Approval step without ad-hoc capability. No preview possible"
Can you tell me what could be the problem ? .I can approvers determining correctly from the badi . In the preview I can see approvers correctly . this message still shows after approving shopping cart completely also.
Thanks in Advance .

Hello Latha,
   This error will not come until you add Ad-hoc approver at last level..for an example.. there are 5 approvers determined by Badi.. You will get this issue when you add Ad-hoc approver after 5th Level of approver then all approver(Including Ad-approver) approved the SC / PO. Here is the solution for this issue.
write the code in your Badi after you appended the approval_table.
    data : lv_index type i.
    describe table approval_table lines lv_index.
     if actual_approval_index gt lv_index.
     no_further_approval_needed = 'X'.
     endif.
please let me know if you need anything help.
John.

Approval step without adhoc capability. No preview possible

Hi All,
I'm using the standard n-step approval workflow (SRM 5.0) for shopping cart and have implemented the workflow badi. It works good for the approval process.
While the user rejects the cart it works good until the 2nd level of approvers. But from the third level though the cart gets rejected it's throwing me the error
" Approval step without adhoc capability. No preview possible " in the graphical overview.
Can anybody please help me to overcome this issue. Points will be awarded for the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Prasnna

Hi,
Which SRM version are you using??Please see if the foll notes help:
1090619 - Problem creating ad hoc agents, no users in wf nodes.
903200 Note for approval status not getting updated
910612 additional note fro SC approval BADI's and WF's
649551 Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
690716 Approval status not getting updated-related note for SP8
930750 restart of classic WF's(issue is with Support pack 9)
525577 Approval Preview - Details for approver not displayed.
Note 999528 - Adding Ad Hoc Approver fails due to comit error
Note 952108 - Incorrect error message when approvers are entered
Note 809157 - BBPPREVIEW: Error "Value too large" as of fourth approver
Note 994735 - All BAdI workflows: ApprovalIndex does not begin with 1
Note 924064 - FM BBP_WFL_DIN_FILL_APPROVER: Approvers may be incorrect
Note 983128 - Approval WF Fragment Has No User Assignment
related links:
SRM 4.0 : Limit PO not showing Approver in Approval Preview
After Add Approver by Approver Preview
Re: SC item approval - Approval preview does not display approvers
BR,
Disha.
<b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

KM Approval iView without authentication

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for