KP02 Mixed Pallet Configuration

Hi
I am trying to understand the KP00 & KP02 condition types for Standard SAP Pallet discounts.
1) KP00 - Full pallet Discount.
2) KP02 - Mixed Pallet Discount( Group Condition & Full pallet discount).
When i define this condition type in Pricing procedure similar to standard SAP "RVA001" it is like below
805 1 kp00
805 2 Kp02
( how does this counter 1 & 2 work in Pricing procedure).
Now i create a condition record for both the condition records .
Create sales order.
Both the condition applied for a Material if it reaches 1 Pallet.
I suppose only ONE Should work and give discount? How does this work?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks

they work together because there is no condition exclusion between them.
regards
ROberto

Similar Messages

Mixed Pallet Discount (KP02)

I want to configure the Mixed pallet discount.
Question:
How should I maintain data in Material Master Record for following materials
Material M1 and M2 (both material must be of same material group)
Whole Unit of measure : 50units = 1 Pallet
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Ashish

Use the Below link
[Pallet Discounts|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/72/6e0330214411d29a0d0000e8a5bd28/content.htm]

Putaway strategy for mixed pallets

Hi guys,
I need your suggestion to determine the correct putaway strategy. This is the scenario: We have a rack which will stock mixed pallets (more than one material) in the same bin. We want the same behavior of the putaway strategy I u201CAddition to existing stocku201D. In order to control the capacity of the bins Iu2019ve configure the Capacity check method 4 u201CUsage check based on materialu201D and try to control the capacity by volume, however, this measure is not realistic because in a pallet exist a lot of space that will not be consume by the material (in this case, books).
Example:
1 Pallet = 1.000 CM3
1 Book = 1 CM3
Consume of material = 1
Bin capacity = 1000
In this case, de capacity check will let stock 1.000 UN of material in the bin, but the true is that one pallet could only contain 700 UN.
I try to get the consume materialu2019s amount dividing the bin capacity by the total quantity of a pallet (Consume of material = 1000 / 700) but this could only works for NOT mixed palletsu2026
A possible solution is the Pallet strategy, but I have the same error. You define the pallet quantity at material level, so I have the same problem for the mixed pallets. Can I indicate the system which materials will go together before the TO creation?
Any suggestion will be really appreciated!
Sebas

Hi Hein
yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
what you think about putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy. if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT permitted . And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
your opnion please.
thanks & best regards
Thomas

Limiting "mixed pallet" on sales orders?

We are trying to determine how to limit the number of "mixed pallets" a customer can order. We have the pallet qty by sku set up on the material master. We'd like to have the system calculate when an order reaches 5 mixed pallets and not allow any more. For example, the customer might order 16 skus that configured together, reach the 5 mixed rule, or they might order 25 depending on the different pallet configurations. How would we go about setting up this rule by customer or customer type? I am not an SAP expert but it seems those who in the company are aren't familiar any way to do this. Any help to get us moving in the right direction would be helpful.

Fernando,
Let me restate your requirement so that I understand your question:
A Sales order is created 'today' with a requested delivery date of 'today'.
There exists adequate material in Stock to confirm the order.
You want the confirmed date to be 'some-amount-of-time-later-than-now"
(say 18 hours or so)
Which confirmed date in the sales order are you talking about?
Confirmed Material Availability date?
Confirmed Loading date?
Confirmed Transportation planning date?
Confirmed Goods Issue date?
Confirmed Delivery Date?
Many people with this requirement use 'delivery scheduling', and add a half day or so in pick/pack processing time. This means that you are recognizing that it takes a bit of time to create the delivery notice, print the shipping papers, pick and pack the parts, and get them ready for the carrier to ship. So, for an order entered 'now', it wouldn't be due to ship from your warehouse until 'a half day from now'.
To enable Delivery scheduling IMG>SD>Basic Functions>Delivery scheduling and transportation scheduling>Define scheduling by sales document type. Select the relevant ordertypes, tick delivery scheduling.
If this is already selected, then you can increase the pick/pack processing time of the shipping point in IMG transaction OVLZ. It can be set to a fraction of a day (2 decimal points).
Regards,
DB49

Mixed Pallets

Hi guys
Please does anyone know of any standard SAP configuration that allows MORE THAN ONE material to be packed/ place on ONE pallet?
Thanks in anticipation of your prompt response.
Regards, Felix

Please does anyone know of any standard SAP configuration that allows MORE THAN ONE material to be packed/ place on ONE pallet?
"Packed" or "placed"?
Both placing two material onto a pallet and packing them into the same HU are possible if your settings are proper.
1. Packing is in connection with HUM > if the packaging material is defined (allowed) for both material, you can pack them into one HU.
2. You can use "Mixed storage without restrictions" setting for your storage type (SPRO > LE > WM > Master Data > Define Storage Types, V_T3010-MISCH). However, this doesn't mean that you can make SAP to automatically create mixed SUs - you can do this only manually...
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f8465c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f846014afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 2, 2009 9:33 PM

SAP WM: Mixed pallet with putaway strategy "P"

Dear Experts,
I am using putaway strategy P for a storage type and I have given X for Mixed storage field.
I am not able to put multiple batches of same material in one bin, is it possible with putaway strategy P
I am not using SU management.
Thanks in advance,
Amit Kumar

This is from a WM colleague:
First it will always look at same bin as a material is stored
with put away strategy “I”.
This scenario is completely wrong, if I understand it right.
He/she needs to look at the bin strategy for the SU types
defined in the LE qty. / SUT types for bin type.
Strategy “I” is for addition to stock like they said.
Capacity check 2 only works if it is SUT active, which they say it is
not. Not the check flag, but the SUT.
The strategy for SUT type allowed to bin type only works if it
is SUT managed, which they say it is not.
The strategy just doesn’t seem right. If they do not use
SU’s, the only capacity check that works is max from the material master (WM-1
view) weight “1”.
The bin type / SUT strategy will not work unless they are using
SUT’s for storage. Not just the LE qty. in the SUT defined.
If they aren’t using SUTs for storage, it is only a quant.
Noting is configurable for strategy of quant to storage bin type.

Wm picking mix pallet from production & staging in high rack storage.

High rack storage is SU managed. I want that if I receceive 3 different material from 3 different production order how can I club them in one pallet & store them in high rack. We have activated wm pp interfaceso that TO is getting created for finished material.

It's difficult to offer logical advice without having a better picture of your operations...As Manish mentioned the stock can be pulled directly form 901 and moved into high rack on same SU as per your requirement. If you are using a dynamic bin for the GR destination bin (bin number can be your production work order number). You could easily use that bin number as your reference to move the specific qty of material into the specific bin you want to move it too.
If using some reference to determine the correct stock to pull from 901 is not a good solution and having the stock placed in a unique storage type/bin for each separate production line is a requirement then yes, automating the TR/TO and "create one new storage type & one bin for every production line. With user exit in TO creation I will decide to which bin TO should get created." sounds like a good solution. With that method the stock placement from GR will be very accurate and it will be aligned with the physical location of the stock.

Pick Mixed Handling Units

I have a scenario with regards to picking mixed pallets (pallets with more than one quant in it). I have a pallet containing multiple quants. I create a delivery that contains these same materials with matching quantities. Is there a way that SAP can propose the source HU as the destination HU when picking the delivery. Currently no matter what config I maintain (HU picking control at both the storage type level and movement type level, or in Define Control for Automatic Creation of Pick HU's) I either have to create the PickHU in a dialogue session or the system creates a PickHU.
Is there a solution for this scenario?
Thanks
Nick

I assume you use the ECC solution; in this case the storage determination/HU takeover is limited by the fact the standard logic is bound the a single item line. I am not aware if a BAdI has been added in you version of platform, so the logic can be enhanced across line items. However, last time I had the issue was in 4.7, which required a small customer enhancement from SAP.
/Steen

Heterogenous Standby Configuration - Oracle 10g

Hi All
I was searching on net to find out if a Heterogenous Standby Configuration could be achieved in Oracle Database Server 10.2.0.4.0?
We have our production Database running on Windows 2003 Server EE running on Dell PowerEdge. Its a two node RAC Database running Oracle database Server EE 10.2.0.4.0.
For this set-up, could we look at having the standby on another server running SUSE Linux. If this is possible, we would be able to proceed with out actually procuring another hardware and also make use of this Linux machine which is failry under utilised at the moment.
From your experiences, could you please advice if this is a sensible way. If such a set-up is existing, it could help from your experiences off what we could expect in terms of pitfalls and so on which you might want us to consider before making a decision this way?
Many thanks for your recommendations in advance.
Regards!
Sarat.

Agreed.. As I was goind through some other posts on the net, I understand this Heterogeneous Standby Configuration is a new feature in Oracle database 11g ...
We might also need to look at that possibility.. however, if there is a place which I could refer to and make some quick notes on such mixed OS configurations, it helps alot... I may also want to go through the 11g documentation meanwhile..
Sarat.

Usrfindform in HTTP/HTTPS configuration

Hello !
We configured access to the login server by HTTPS and to the portal by HTTP. All works fine except portlets for
management of users ("Portal User Profile"). In this portlet the popup window for selecting username is retrived not by HTTP
(as portlet page) but by HTTPS. Inside the POPUP window there is some javascript code which should passback selected
username to the calling portlet, but due to security restrictions of browser (i suppose) the passback does not work.
Is this a bug or have i something misconfigured ?
Excuse my poor English.
Thanks for help
Jiri Glumbik

Yes, this is a known limitation which results from this mixed mode configuration.
In this case, you have to type in the name of the user you want to edit, as you
have discovered, you cannot select the user from the list.
In 9iASv2, this is addressed by using some special Javascript and
configuring the user management UI and the Portal to define a shared domain
within which javascript calls can be trusted. It then allows it to work.

Creating mix storage unit at id point

how can I create mix storage unit at id point. When I do gr of purchase order TO is created & confirmed automatically for id point. so I want to create mix pallet at id point. How can I create it . I checked LT09 but there only one storage unit I can enter in initial screen.

is this pallet number known into the system (is the warehouse HU managed) ?
if it is a SU managed
As per standard SAP flow the stock first comes to 902 storage type and then it goes to physical bin location.
in your case since there are 10 different material document are there 10 different TR will be there and against each TR you are supposed to create the TO now another complexity is that physically all the material is on the same SU whereas none of the TO is confirmed yet so the SU number is still in runtime. at least one TO should get confirmed so that you can use the top up logic by using the same SU
Looking at the complexity and other operational issue (during picking) I don't suggest that you should go with this approach however you are free to design the system based on your business requirement by taking into consideration of all the pros and cons of system as well as physical operation

Condition types and scale basis

Hi
Can any one tell me for conditions types and scale basis for maintaining condition records
thanx in adv

dear
Scales in nothing but a range of order quantity, according to the pricing element depending upon the range of quantity prices way be increased/decreased, higher discounts, low freight changes can be offered.
Ex: when per one item is 100/- if customer placed the order for
Range          price
100/-
95/-
90/-
Check --value:
We can specify the changing rule for scale rates as ascending or descending.
Scale type:
This indicator controls the validity of the scale value or percentage from certain quantities or value up to certain quantity or value, alternatively it is possible to work with internal scales that must be stored in the condition type that is the scale type the interval scale cant be change in the condition record due to technical reasons ex: condition type PR02 graduated scale.
Scale formula:
We can specify the formula for determining the scale base value; we can provide formulas that has not been provided in the standard system. Ex: condition type KP003 to support mixed pallet surcharges can be used
Condition scales:
We can maintain scales for each and every condition type so that we can determine pricing condition value depending upon the range of order quantity.
Ex: If we maintain condition record for PR00 for material one as a Rs.1000/- for one material then we can maintain scale for this material like below.
     Quantity          Price
0-10     1000.00
11-20     999.00
21-30     998.00
31-40     997.00
Configuration settings:
Go to VK11; maintain condition record for PR00,
Select line item and click on scale icon on the application tool bar &
Maintain scale rates accordingly, save it & exit.
Got to VA01 and raise scales order, validity periods to scale. Check the condition value
rewards if it helps
siva
Message was edited by:
        siva narayana

8.0 to 8.2.1 upgrade

I am upgrading from LV8.0 to LV8.2.1. After the SW install completed, all of my top level vi’s are broken. I have two main issues so far. There may be more but with all top level vi’s broken I don’t have any visibility.
1) When I did a mass compile on my first project folder I got over 700 “### Bad VI” entries! This project is only moderate in size, maybe 500 vi’s. When I looked into a couple of the vi’s to see what was wrong, it appeared in each case the 8.2.1 subvi was not compatible with the 8.0 subvi. One example is in the report generation tools. I no longer have the excel or word options in the New Report.vi even though the “LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office” utility is still installed. How can I regain my ability to write excel and word docs? Also, the Dispose Report.vi no longer has save options. Will open files be saved and closed before the vi terminates or do I need to add more code to do this?
2) I had customized my Functions and Control pallets with special driver libraries. I am using the .lvlib constructs to load application specific drivers. The pallets are now reset to default. Is there a way to preserve the pallet configuration during upgrades? This can’t be all that difficult.
Backwards compatibility and preserving user configurations are both hallmarks of good programming practices. Surely you are not going to force me to repair 50 vi’s per project and reconfigure my pallets every time I do an upgrade. There must be a better solution. Any advice would be appreciated.
Bob

When upgrading LabVIEW, toolkits have never been automatically moved from the old to the new version. One reason, I think, is that often, a toolkit will require it's own upgrade in order to be compatible. I think in other cases, there are license issues where the toolkit can only be used with a single version. Assuming that the Report Gen Toolkit does not require an upgrade, you can re-install it and it should be available in 8.2. You might also try copying the relevant files from the 8.0 folder to the same place in the 8.2 folder. I don't use this toolkit so I don't know if an upgrade is required or even which folders need to be copied.

Network Printing through Linksys PSUS4 works in leopard 10.5.1.

Over here: http://forums.linksys.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=WiredPrintServers&message.id=578&jump=true#M578
At the linksys forum, user Tpaquette recently posted a gem that enabled me to get my macbook (running 10.5.1) to print to my HP 6110 all in one wirelessly over the network using the gutenprint drivers included with the OS. I thought I'd echo the post over here so that more folks could benefit from it, but perhaps if it works for you, you could go to the linksys thread and add a reply with your printer model to the growing list of those that this works with.
Cheers,
Ethan
http://forums.linksys.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=WiredPrintServers&message.id=578&jump=true#M578
From: Tpaquette
I've spent far too many hours trying to get this to work for me not to share it with all of you frustrated Vista/OS X users out there. The instructions that I've laid out here is from my Canon MP830 printer install.
I believe the steps/process should work for any printer that you can find a CUPS driver for. I'm runing Vista Home Premium, Vista Ultimate and Mac OS X 10.4.10 just in case anyone wants to know what clients I have setup to access the PSUS4.
So here's is what you need to do to get a mixed environment configured for printing..
1. Setup your Vista and XP clients using the setup wizard on the CD that came with the print server. Pretty straight forward, you should have no problems.
2. To setup the Mac, you will need to setup a static IP address on the Print Server. To do this log onto your printserver from your browser. Under the Protocol, TCP/IP tab, input an IP address of your printserver, the subnet and gateway (see example)
I used the following IP Address
IP Address ... 192.168.1.106
Subnet Mask ... 255.255.255.0
Gateway ...192.168.1.1
Save your settings.
3. Download the Gutenprint 5.1.3 drivers for OS X and install on your Mac running OSX.
http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/MacOSX.php3
4. Using the Printer Setup Utility in OS X, select the "Plus sign" to add a printer. Click on the IP Printer Icon to bring up the IP settings.
5. Select LPD for your protocol, enter the IP address of the print server from above, name your queue "LP".
6. Under Name, enter the name of the printer, under location, provide a location (optional) and under Print Using, select Canon and you will then see all the print drivers that you installed back in step 3. Select the Canon Pixma MP830-CUPS+Gutenprint v5.1.3 driver or any other Printer Manufacture/Model that you need.
7. Once you complete step 6, you should have a new printer added to your list of printers and you should be able to print.
I've only tested this for my MP830 and I'm assuming that the process will work for other printers. If you try this and it works, let others know.
Take care.

For Leopard users, instead of loading the CUSP driver as noted in the post, use the Gutenprint driver that comes with Leopard. Upon trying to print after upgrading to Leopard with the CUSP driver you will error. Quick change of the driver to the Gutenprint versio should do the charm.

SPA504g provisioning, firmare update failure, file not found.

Hello all,
I am provisioning SPA504g phones using a tftp server and it works well, however there is something that annoys me. I have the phones doing firmware updates with the update rule: tftp://sip.XXXXXXXXX.net/Cisco/spa$PSN/Firmware/from-$SWVER/spa$PSN.bin and they do come in and attempt to collect that file however when they are up to date (as they are all now on 7.5.5b) and therefore there is no file for them to collect, the phone considers this to be an upgrade failure and so it retries after the "Upgrade Error Retry Delay" time (default 2 mins) instead of just considering this to be no upgrade available. This means every 2 mins the screen flashes the UPGRADING FIRMWARE message briefly.
I could just raise that timeout to a day, but I is there a better way of fixing this?
Kevin

As long as you configured the firmware URL, you are claiming there IS firmware available.
So, either
1. make firmware to be available. Even it is the same version. Phone will fetch it one time, it will recognize it's the same, then will not fetch it again as long as the firmware URL will not change.
2. it's nice trick to use $SWVER in URL. Use the similar trick even for the profile URL. Make sure the Upgrade Enable is set to "No" if phone run newest firmware. You may extract Upgrade Enable option to be only option in Profile Rule B file so the $SWVER bias will apply to Profile Rule B only.
I is there a better way of fixing this
Yes, in my humble opinion. Use HTTP server instead of TFTP. Even simple PHP script will allow you to make not only upgrade logic, but more complex magic according yours wishes. You may mix tftp configuration with http style configuration as well - there are four independent profile rule options configurable. Just be careful, particular option could not be in two or more profiles.
Mark thread as answered if it answered your question. It will help others to found solutions.

KP02 Mixed Pallet Configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for