KQL query using "Greater Than" fails

I have developed a CSOM app that does a KQL query against several managed properties. One of these properties is numeric (mapped to RefinableDouble01), so I have a greater than (>) comparison in the query string:
     RefinableDouble01>41.12345
I developed the app in Office 365 and when I run the query there, it works fine (no errors).  However, when I run it to our internal SharePoint 2013 site, it fails with the error:
     "We didn't understand your search terms. Make sure they're using proper syntax."
As far as I can tell, the configuration of the internal site matches the Office 365 site.
If I use a query on a text property, so that I don't use the greater than comparison, that query works. The query results from that query also show that the managed property RefinableDouble01 is properly mapped and returns the expected numeric value.
Does anyone know what the problem is? I'm wondering if the KQL query functionality is not properly set up in our internal site, but that is not an area that I am familiar with.
Bob Feldman

Here is more information, from the ULS Log file, regarding the error:
06/27/2014 11:05:13.47 NodeRunnerQuery1-d8a6a564-7b37- (0x0BA4) 0x0DC4 Search                        Query Processing
aizc0 High    Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Ims.ImsQueryInternal : New request: Query text 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345', Query template ''; HiddenConstraints: ; SiteSubscriptionId: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 NodeRunnerQuery1-d8a6a564-7b37- (0x0BA4) 0x0DC4 Search                        Query Processing
aizgn Medium Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Executors.QueryPipelineHardWiredFlowExecutor : (FlowExecutor)eventSearchFlowDone: d8a6a564-7b37-4815-a35f-f97acc0d6cba, RefinableDouble01>41.12345, Microsoft.ProductivitySearchFlow,
0, SPWFEAPP, Error=Exception occurred due to some other exception fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4 fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 NodeRunner.exe (0x0BA4)                 0x0DC4 SharePoint Server Search      Query
aisyt High    ExecuteFlowInternal FlowExecutor:Microsoft.ProductivitySearchFlow Exception: Microsoft.Ceres.Evaluation.DataModel.CommonEvaluationException: Exception occurred due to some other exception ---> Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.QueryMalformedException:
Query 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345' failed: syntax error at position 0, The operation is illegal for the given property, property expression: RefinableDouble01>41.8882213637562     --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Processing.KeywordQueryParserEvaluator.KeywordQueryParserProducer.ParseKeywordQuery(String queryText, ParsingContext parsingContext, Boolean debugMode, String& searchTerms)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Processing.KeywordQueryParserEvalua... fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 w3wp.exe (0x196C)                       0x41B0 SharePoint Server Search      Query
dk68 High    SearchServiceApplication::Execute--Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.QueryMalformedException: We didn't understand your search terms. Make sure they're using proper syntax. ---> System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceApplicationFault]:
Query 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345' failed: syntax error at position 0, The operation is illegal for the given property, property expression: RefinableDouble01>41.8882213637562    Server stack trace:      at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.HandleReply(ProxyOperationRuntime
operation, ProxyRpc& rpc)     at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)     at ... fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4

Similar Messages

Xpath query using greater than operator

I'm trying to evaluate some xml to determine if it matches some criterium.
MyXmlColumns contains the following kind of data "<Values><Value>data1</Value><Value>data2</Value><Values>"
When I execute the following query I get zero rows returned when it should match some rows containing this data.
select * from mydata
where existsNode(MyXmlColumn, '/Values/Value[. > "data1"]') = 1
The question is why greter than, lesser than, does not work, and if there is any alternative.
If I use equals operator, or greater than but using a number it works.
I know that I can use XmlExists function but I'm using Oracle 9i r2 so it's not an option.
Thanks in advance for any suggestion.

but I'm using Oracle 9i r2
The question is why greter than, lesser than, does not workWorks on 9.2.0.8:
SQL> select * from v$version where rownum = 1
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 - 64bit Production
1 row selected.
SQL> with mydata as
   select xmltype('<Values><Value>data1</Value><Value>data2</Value></Values>') MyXmlColumn from dual
select * from mydata t where existsNode(t.MyXmlColumn, '/Values/Value') < 3
MYXMLCOLUMN
<Values>
<Value>data1</Value>
<Value>data2</Value>
</Values>
1 row selected.

Partition by range using greater than or in between statment?

Can you partition by range using greater than or in between statment? If so, can someone please post the syntax?

ji**** wrote:
Can you partition by range using greater than or in between statment? If so, can someone please post the syntax?http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10500_01/server.920/a96524/c12parti.htm
CREATE TABLE sales_range
(salesman_id NUMBER(5),
salesman_name VARCHAR2(30),
sales_amount NUMBER(10),
sales_date DATE)
PARTITION BY RANGE(sales_date)
PARTITION sales_jan2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('02/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_feb2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('03/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_mar2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('04/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY')),
PARTITION sales_apr2000 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('05/01/2000','DD/MM/YYYY'))
);

How to use (greater than) in web services call

Hello, I am trying to query a set of assets where the external unique ID is greater than 400,000. My existing code looks like
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'"
However, using this will return any asset record starting with a 5 or above as far as I can tell, I assume b/c it is comparing string data due to the single quotes infering data of type text (string). Is it possible to use comparison operators with numeric data correctly?
I posed this question to support and received the below answer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body> <AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/asset/"> <ListOfAsset xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/asset"> <Asset> <AssetId /> <PurchaseDate/> <OwnerAccountId /> <ExternalSystemId>> '400000'</ExternalSystemId> </Asset> </ListOfAsset> </AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
Basically, instructing me to use &gt. I'm doing coding in .NET visual studio and not using the XML as above. However, I did try the following:
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'" which returned an error in the compiler.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I would assume "external system id" is an integer, but, I will test on a custom field that I now is of type integer.
Could you take your same code and use a non-zero value for the operand? For example, could you try
objAccQryParam.ListOfAccount[0].CustomInteger0 = ">= '10'"; and let me know if that returns values that are greater than or equal to 10. Using a two digit number is important. Assuming you have data greater than 10.
Thanks!

Problem with Filtering Data by Using "Greater Than" in APD

Dear Experts,
First of all, I am a novice of SAP Data Mining. I try to filter data in APD by using the 'Restrict Amont of Data (the Filter Icon).' My problem is really simple. I don't know how to filter data which have value greater than a constant.
For example, I try to keep only records which have a quantity greater than 1000.
At the selection option in the single value tab, I found only the '=' option. The options like '>', '<', '>=', etc are not found. Could anyone suggest me please?

I do appreciate your prompt response.
Seemingly, using the interval is our best solution, though it is not best for our customers.
Having already gone through the note you gave me, in fact, it is really pertinent. Unfortunately, our support package is now 13, and it is extremely difficult to retest our system if we decide to apply the support package 16.
Are there any other solution?
By the way, you deserve my point.

Using greater than - less than in a date query in a form

In version 5, the user could put in ">03/05/08" in a date field, hit the execute query button, and the form would pull up everything >3/5/2008. In version 10g, I get all format errors when I put in the same thing. Is there a work-around, or is this feature no longer supported in 10g?

I assume you have recently performed an upgrade to Forms 10g. Did you only upgrade to Forms 10g or were their other upgrades as well (like the Database)? Has the NLS_DATE_FORMAT changed? Can you run your query in SQL*Plus successfully? Any additional information you can provide will greatly aid us in helping you troubleshoot this issue.
Craig...

Using 'Greater than/less than' in dynamic where condition

Hi Guys,
I am trying to use a logical expression with GT/LT condition in dynamic where, butits giving dump "expression worngly parenthesised' . My query runs perfectly fine when the logical expression does not have 'GT/LT' . Is there a different way of using GT/LT in dynamic where or is it not posiible at all?? Please find my query below -
IF vendor IS NOT INITIAL.
      i_where_clause = 'a~lifnr = vendor'.
      APPEND i_where_clause.
      CLEAR i_where_clause.
    ENDIF.
    IF to_date IS NOT INITIAL.
      i_where_clause = 'a~zzearliestdep LT to_date'.
      APPEND i_where_clause.
      CLEAR i_where_clause.
    ENDIF.
    IF from_date IS NOT INITIAL.
      i_where_clause = 'a~zzlatestdep GT from_date'.
      APPEND i_where_clause.
      CLEAR i_where_clause.
    ENDIF.
SELECT aebeln alifnr azzearliestdep azzlatestdep
            bebelp belikz b~kzabs
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_podetails
       UP TO max_hits ROWS
       FROM ( ekko AS a INNER JOIN ekpo AS b
               ON aebeln = bebeln )
       WHERE a~ebeln = ebeln AND
            (i_where_clause).

Hi,
Try this -
IF vendor IS NOT INITIAL.
i_where_clause = 'a~lifnr = vendor'.
APPEND i_where_clause.
ENDIF.
IF to_date IS NOT INITIAL.
if i_where_cause[] is not initial.
    i_where_clause = 'AND'
    append i_where_cause.
endif.
i_where_clause = 'a~zzearliestdep LT to_date'.
APPEND i_where_clause.
ENDIF.
IF from_date IS NOT INITIAL.
if i_where_cause[] is not initial.
    i_where_clause = 'AND'
    append i_where_cause.
endif.
i_where_clause = 'a~zzlatestdep GT from_date'.
APPEND i_where_clause.
CLEAR i_where_clause.
ENDIF.
Cheers.
\[removed by moderator\]
Edited by: Jan Stallkamp on Jun 26, 2008 1:08 PM

Updates using greater than or less than logic....

Hi, I've run into something that I can't figure out how to do through the OWB GUI. I have a source table that tells me that data changed between a given effective start and effective end dates (for example, NAME information). Given that, I want to update all rows in the person dimension tied to the matching person, where the effective date on the person dim is between the effective start and end dates on the source table.
Using the standard update operator, it looks like the only option I have is "=", I can't specify "<=" or ">=".
Is there any (easy) way around this?
Thanks,
Scott

I'd like to expand on Bharad's join condition.
Keep in mind that you have to use the effective start date two times (see below).
ingrp1 a.person_id =ingrp2 b.person_id
and ingrp1 a.effective_start_date >= ingrp2 b.effective_start_date
and ingrp1 a.effective_startdate <= ingrp2 b.effectiveend_date
Also, in most dimension tables the effective end date can contain NULL values which we need to take care off as well otherwise we will 'lose' records. A NVL can fix that problem, for example:
ingrp1 a.person_id =ingrp2 b.person_id
and ingrp1 a.effective_start_date >= ingrp2 b.effective_start_date
and ingrp1 a.effective_start_date <= nvl( ingrp2 b.effective_end_date, sysdate)
You can also substitute sysdate for a fixed date in the future but it's not dynamic then.

Disk Utility shows Used greater than Capacity?

I have a Smartdisk 80GB Firelite that is partitioned and erased, yet in disk utility it shows 74.4GB Capacity, 74.4GB Available, and 34.6GB Used. That doesn't make any sense at all. How can I get the used space back to Zero?

Yes, I've used Disk Utility to partition. I've done 1 partition, 2 partitions, 16 partitions, I've partitioned as Unix then back to Mac OS. When I had 16 partitions there were about 4.5 GBs per partition and it would say 20.4 GBs used on a 4.5 GB partition, this is the readout at the bottom of Disk Utility when you click on the drive. I've ran repair disk and everything is okay. I've ran Disk Warrior and everything is okay. It's very strange, my 80gb Firelite drive is completely empty, no data, it's been erased and partitioned a number of times and Disk Utility still says it has Used GBs, when it should be close to zero.

Trying to use greater than in a case statement

What is the correct way to write this case statement?
Case
F.NextOrder2
> F.CutOff
Then
Else F.NextOrder2
as NextOrder3

You're missing END, e.g.
CASE when F.NextOrder2 > F.CutOff then '' else cast(F.NextOrder2 as varchar(100)) end as NextOrder3
All values in the CASE statement must be of the same data type.
See this blog post why
SQL Server Case/When Data Type problems
Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming. (c) by Donald Knuth
Naomi Nosonovsky, Sr. Programmer-Analyst
My blog

Temp files greater than 2GB

While running an OBIEE report, I receive the following error:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46073] Operation 'stat()' on file '/u02/OracleBIData/tmp/nQS_28056_15671_77250638.TMP' failed with error: (75) . (HY000)
The problem seems to be that the TEMP file created by the query is greater than 2 GB.
Is there a way within OBIEE to bypass the 2 GB file size limitation of 32-bit servers (Windows/LINUX)?

John - I don't understand how this is a cache issue. The file being created is a TEMP file in the /OracleBI_Data/tmp directory. What is the relationship between the TEMP directory and cache?
My DATA_STORAGE_PATHS is currently set at 4 GB.
By the way, I have spent a lot of time reading your OBIEE blog, and have found it to be extremely helpful.

Greater Than Clause in Parition

Hi,
I need to find out why can we use greater than value clause instead of Less than clause in Oracle Partitions.
Can anyone advice me.
Cheers!!!

Nope, not according to syntax for range_values_clause
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_7002.htm#i2125922
Regards
Peter

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

Parse an XML of size greater than 64k using DOM

Hi,
I had a question regarding limitation of parsing a file of size greater than 64k in Oracle 10g. Is the error "ORA-31167: XML nodes over 64K in size cannot be inserted" related to this ?
One of the developers was telling that if we load an XML document of size greater than 64k into Oracle DOM, it will fail. Is 64k the size of the file or the size of text node in the XML?
Is there a way we can overcome this limitation?
I believe that Oracle 11g R1 documentation states that existing 64k limitation on the size of a text node has been eliminated. So if we use Oracle 11g, does it mean we can load XML files of size greater than 64K (or XML having text nodes of size greater than 64k)
I am not well versed with XML. Please help me out.
Thanks for your help.

Search this forum for the ORA-error.
Among others it will show the following: Node size
In this case I think we can assured that "a future release" in 2006 was 11.1 as mentioned by Mark (= Sr Product Manager Oracle XML DB)

PUT Blobs of size greater than 5.5MB fail with HTTPS but not HTTP

I have written a Cygwin app that uploads (using the REST API PUT operation) Block Blobs to my Azure storage account, and it works well for different size blobs when using HTTP. However, use of SSL (i.e. PUT using HTTPS) fails for Blobs greater than 5.5MB.
Blobs less than 5.5MB upload correctly. Anything greater and I find that the TCP session (as seen by Wireshark) reports a dwindling window size that goes to 0 once the aforementioned number of bytes have been transferred. The failure is very repeatable and
consistent. As a point of reference, PUT operations against my Google/AWS/HP accounts work fine when using HTTPS for various object sizes, which suggests my problem is not in my client but specific to the HTTPS implementation on the MSAZURE storage servers.
If I upload the 5.5MB blob as two separate uploads of 4MB and 1.5MB followed by a PUT Block List, the operation succeeds as long as the two uploads used
separate HTTPS sessions. Notice the emphasis on separate. That same operation fails if I attempt to maintain an HTTPS session across both uploads. This is another data point that seems to suggest that the Storage
server has a problem
Any ideas on why I might be seeing this odd behavior that appears very specific to MS Azure HTTPS, but is not seen when used against AWS/Google/HP cloud storage servers?

Hi,
I'm getting this problem also when trying to upload blobs > 5.5mb using the Azure PHP SDK with HTTPS.
There is no way I can find to get a blob > 5.5mb to upload, unless you use http, rather than https, which is not a good solution.
I've written my own scripts to use the HTTP_Request2 library, to send the request as a test, and it fails with that also when using the 'socket' method.
However, if I write a script using the PHP Curl extension directly, then it works fine, and blobs > 5.5mb get uploaded.
It seems to be irrelevant which method is used, uploading in 1 go, or using smaller chunks, the PHP SDK seems broken.
Also, I think I've found another bug in the SDK, when you do the smaller chunks, the assigning of the BlockID is not correct.
In: WindowsAzure/Blob/BlobRestProxy.php
Line: $block->setBlockId(base64_encode(str_pad($counter++, '0', 6)));
That is incorrect usage of the str_pad function, and if you upload a huge blob that needs splitting, then the blockIDs will after a while become a different length and therefore fail.
It should be: str_pad($counter++, 6, '0',STR_PAD_LEFT);
I also think there is 1 too many base64_encodes() in there, as I think its being done twice, once in that line, and then again within the createBlobBlock() just before the send() for a 2nd time.
Can someone please advice, when this/these bug(s) will be fixed in the PHP SDK, as at the moment its useless to me as I cant upload things securely.

KQL query using "Greater Than" fails

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for