KSV5 ASSESMENT

AS PER OUR COMPANY'S BUSINESS PROCESS WE ARE USING KSV5. I WANT TO KNOW AFTER RUNNING  KSV5 ALL RECEIVER COST CENTER WILL BE UPDATED AND  FROM OKB9 I AM ASSIGNING COST CENTER TO PARTICULAR COST ELEMENT.
BUT STILL MY COST ELEMENT ARE NOT UPDATED( WHEN I RUN FBL3N). CAN ANY ONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW CAN I UPDATED MY COST ELEMENT. IS THERE ANY WAY?

Hi,
Assessment is running on secondary cost elements and creates only CO documents, so there is no possibility to view the movements via FBL3N transaction, which is used for viewing FI documents on G/L.
Regards,
Eli
P.S. Please, respect the rules and do not use CAPITAL letters in your messages

Similar Messages

  • Want to Change GL Account in Line Item of KSV5

    Hi,
    In my requirement I need to change GL Account in one of Actual Line Items of transaction KSV5(Execute Actual Distribution).
    Can any one suggest the Userexits/BADi for this kind of change or any other way to do.
    Thanks.
    RP

    check this exits
    SAPLKAL1              Allocations: Authorization Check in Cycle Maintenance
    SAPMKAL1             Allocations: Authorization Check in Cycle Maintenance
    SAPMKGA2            Allocation: Execute Authorization Check for Cycle

  • CO Distribution KSV5

    Hi,
    I have created a cycle in KSV5 the restriction sender values are too high.
    I want the system to take all cots/revenues CElm in a group (B) within a CCtr group (A), with a variable portion of CElm group (E), (these CElm are all included in group B).
    Distribute the fixed amount of X, Y and Z SEK of CCtr 1, 2, and 3 which are included in group A to receiver, to CCtr group (F).
    I have entered the following:
    1) Iterative cycle
    2) Segment 1;
    a) Sender rule: Fixed amount, 100%, act values.
    b) Receiver tracing factor: Variable portion, actual cost, no scaling.
    c) The base for senders: are Cost Center (CCtr in group (A)), Cost Element (CElm in group (B))
    d) The base for receiver is (Group CCtr (F))
    e) Sender values:  is X ,Y and Z SEK from sender CCtr 1, 2 and 3 included in CCtr group A( the rest of the CCTR 0 SEK).
    f) Receiver tracing faction, actual from CElm group (E), CElm included in CElm group (B).
    g) Receiver weight factor is set to 100 for the receiving CCtrs.
    As I result I want the system to distribute amount X, Y and Z , portioned by CCElm group (E), but it takes amount X, Y and Z  and credit  all CElm in group (B) even if there are no postings on them in CCtrs 1, 2 and 3. (The weighting and the sender and receiver CCtr are OK. 
    Thankfully for any help.
    BR

    ELIBJU,
    I can not see any difference between your expectation and system works. The system just followed your expectation to distribute the fixed amount X, Y, Z by crediting all CElm in group B. What is your question?
    If what you concern is the sender value too high only. Use assessment instead to avoid 'duplicate' distribution by each CElm in group B which is SAP style.

  • Real-Time Integration is activated but no posting made in FI from KSV5

    Hi
    Real-Time Integration of Controlling with Financial Accounting is activated but when we do KSV5 - Distribution  Run system is not creating FI document for that. but properly posting CO document.
    If i do KB41N - Enter Manual Posting, system create FI document. I dont understand why system is doing so.
    Bittu

    Dear All,
    Any Input..
    Bittu

  • Net value and assesable value

    Dear Experts,
    In Import pricing procedure we different pricing condition like
    1.PACKING AND FORWARDING
    2. SUPPLIER INSURANCE
    3. OCCAN/ AIR FRIGHT  CHARGES
    4.IMPORT INSURANCE
    5. LANDING CHARGES
    to obtain  NET VALUE  which are pricing condiion value has to added
    Please tell me what is difference between  Net VALUE and  ASSESABLE VALUE,
    THIS

    Hi,
    Net value is basic material price with includes all delivery cost & fright.
    Asseable value is
    Basic price (% of material value)  depent on product & chapter ID. (Custom will provide abetment for product)
    Fright (Import)
    Insurence cost
    Landing cost 1%
    SAM
    Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 9, 2010 4:19 PM

  • Import Pricing Procedure-Assesable Value

    Dear All,
    we already having import pricing procedure, now we are adding the assesable value condition in the pricing procedure JASS is the condition which added. All customs duty is calculated properly but at the end we have the conditon of actual price which is basic price + taxes which is not coming properly. after adding the assesable value the actual price is copying the value of assesable value. actual price is statistical and in sub total column 'S - Copy values to KOMP-EFFWR (effective value)' is there. what is the reason it is not calculating the acutal price correctly?
    Thanks in advance
    Ramakant

    hi
    check following
    in ur pricing u have to create following
    JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1 IN : CVD
    JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC Additional Duty of Custom
    JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
    In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
    Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
    Calculat.type A (Percentage)
    Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
    Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
    Now for setoff
    maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
    JCV1, JECV, JADC
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
    JCV1 in CVD condition field.
    JECV in ECS condition field.
    JADC in ACD condition field.
    in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
    it is hardcode in the standard
    Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
    Import scenario
    1.Create material master of import goods.
    2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
    3. Maintain CIN settings.
    4. Maintain J1id.
    5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
    6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
    7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
    Save the PO.
    8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
    9. Capture Excises invoice--D.
    10.MIGO.
    12.Post Excise Invoice.
    13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

  • Custom Duties on Assesable value to be added in Purc Document

    We have made  a Pur Order for value Rs 100 and we want to add custom Duties applicable on Assesable Value Rs 200 in the Purc. Order itself.(case of goods imported from foreign country)
    i.e.  Rs 100 +  Duties applicable on the basis of Asses. Value Rs 200
    How can we achive this.

    over

  • Assesable value is not updating in RG1

    Hi frnds,
    Please solve this prob. which I am facing.
    i am selling finshed goods.
    RG1 register is updating very well except the assesable value on which the excise is levied.
    Please guide me ,Is there any customizing setting are there ?
    I am using Jass condition typein my pricing procedure for assesable value.
    TaxINN is the tax procedure I am using.
    Please help me
    Sunil

    Why u maintained J1ID for TAXINN !
    J1ID only for TAXINJ
    In taxinn system caliclates excise duty based on , What is the base value in the sales pricing procedure for JASS.so it never consider assessbul value in J1ID..

  • Allocation of Common Expenses- KSV5

    Dear All,
    I tried to run this T Code KSV5 for distribution of Common expenses.There was no cycle found for allocation.Please suggest me as how to create the cycle and T Code to be used.
    Thanks
    Nagendra Prasad BS

    Hi Nagendra,
    In the same t.code.go to extras menu bar,click on cycle and select create from it or you can use shift+F5 button. For creation of cycle refer the link.
    Create Actual Distribution 11/12/07 (via KSV5)
    Regards,
    Mukthar

  • Transaction KSB1 - KSV5

    Good Morning.
    We have problems with the transaction KSB1.We have the cost center
    10382002 and the cost element 560190992. If we trie a Total, we have 0
    USD but 16,16 ARS. The two value will be 0. In this case we have a
    differenz. We have this problem from February 2007.
    We execute the transaction KSV5 to actual distribution and we saw in
    the line 157 to 160 that we have differenz with the field Value
    TranCurr 3257,50 ARS - Value ObjCurr 3249,44 ARS (differenz 8,06 ARS);
    Vbl. Value TranCurr. 3257,50 ARS - Vbl. Value ObjCurr. 3249,44 ARS
    (differenz 8,06 ARS). The total is 16.16 ARS.
    I was analyzing some Notes but I didn't find it.
    Please if you have some solution for this issue, contact me as soon as
    possible!!
    Thanks very much.
    Adrián Aldave
    Edited by: Adrián Aldave on Jun 18, 2008 4:20 PM

    Hi Adrian,
    as a complement to what was written above:
    With the following you should be able to see if the settings are coherent between FI-GL and CO:
    - You can check the definition of exhange rate type in : Sapnetweaver > General Settings > Currencies > Check Exchange Rate Types, as an example check if type M is activated.
    - You can check the Excnahge rate type in version settings for CO (OKEQN / OKEVN tcode) : check if the exchange rate is fixed to the value "M" as an example.
    With the following you should be able to see if currency settings depending on the period are coherent:
    - Sapnetweaver > General Settings > Currencies > Enter Exchange Rates
    In OKEVN Tcode for versions you can fix a "value date" to update the postings at a precise date.
    Hope it's helpfull for you
    Regards
    Pascal

  • KSV5 - Document Type SA is not relevant for IVA Registry

    Hello Gurus,
    Am getting this error while running tcode KSV5.
    No update performed due to an error
    Message no. GA719
    Diagnosis
    A serious error occurred during processing.
    System Response
    Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
    Procedure
    This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
    This is occuring for all periods. Please provide analysis for the related issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shanthi

    Hi GTNRNR, 
    -- Check in  Customer Master Record (XD01) in billing tab the invoicing list Dates & Invoicing dates fields
    --Go to T.Code OVT0 & check these fields are included in your account group
    --Maintain the Copy controls for Proforma Invoice (F8) to Invoice list(LR) in VTFF
    --in header Copying Req 016
    --check mark on copy item numbers
    --Pos/neg qty is +
    ---Go to VF21 and enter the billing document No & Billing Type as LR & Execute
    Let me know if your problem is resolved.
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Excise Assesable Value from Existing excise Invoices In Subcontracting

    Dear All,
    My requirement is that during Subcontracting Challan creation System should pick assesable value of material from existing excise Invoices & not from Assesable Value maintained in J1id.
    I have done all subcontracting related configurations. I am not maintaining assesable value in J1id.
    Now while creating subcontracting challan system is not showing existing excise invoices when i click excise Invoice tab & passing a warning msg that assesable value of material is Zero.
    Is it a bug or lack in configuration? Need experts advice.
    Thanks
    Nitesh

    Hi,
    You have to always maintain assessable value of the components to be supplied to subcontracting vendor in J1ID and also excise rates for the chapter ids are linked with these components. So, in J1IF01, system will take assessable value as excise value base value and calculate excise duty based on tax invoice, as per my knowledge it cannot be linked with existing tax invoice.

  • Cisco ISE posture assesment and client provisioning

    Hello,
    I have Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I have configured RADIUS in between these device.
    Also I have configured RADIUSbetween Cisco ISE and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to do posture assesment for these devices(Cisco ISE and Cisco ASA or Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS). Please give me whole steps to do posture assesment for cisco ios device in Cisco ise.
    Also, please provide me logs related to posture assesment and client provisioning.
    Thanks in advance.

    You may go through the below listed link to download a PDF link
    Posture assessment with ISE.
    http://www.cisco.com/web/CZ/expo2012/pdf/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.pdf
    ~BR
    Jatin Katyal
    **Do rate helpful posts**

  • Posture Assesment/Remediation is not working in my ADSSO setup.

    Hello Guys,
    I set up my NAC L3 out of band and use for ADSSO. ADSSO authentication is working fine but when i apply the rules for Posture Assesment and remediation is not working. Folks, What seems to be the problem of this.
    Thank you and best regards,
    Edwin

    Hello Guys,
    I set up my NAC L3 out of band and use for ADSSO. ADSSO authentication is working fine but when i apply the rules for Posture Assesment and remediation is not working. Folks, What seems to be the problem of this.
    Thank you and best regards,
    Edwin

  • Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me out
    iam getting an error while running a Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk box.
    When run the same in the test run, there isn't any error log. but when i deselect the same & run iam getting an error like
    First Message:
    Balance per segment 9999 is not zero
    Message no. FAGL_COFI025
    Diagnosis
    Balance per segment 9999 is not zero.
    The balance on segment 9999 is 50.00 (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00 (controlling area currency).
    System Response
    With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
    Procedure
    If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
    If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
    2nd Message
    Balance per segment 1000 is not zero
    Message no. FAGL_COFI025
    Diagnosis
    Balance per segment 1000 is not zero.
    The balance on segment 1000 is 50.00- (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00- (controlling area currency).
    System Response
    With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
    Procedure
    If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
    If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
    3rd Message
    No update performed due to an error
    Message no. GA719
    Diagnosis
    A serious error occurred during processing.
    System Response
    Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
    Procedure
    This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
    I would appreciate an early reply........!!!
    Thanks & Regards,
    Neela

    Hi,
    Check notes 764652 and 897086; it might be helpful.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for