Landing Charges

Hi Gurus
In imports po i want the landing charges 1% to be propsed automatically in the PO conditions . How do I do it?
Regards

first go to calculation schema in pricing procedure
follow the menu path material management > purchasing > conditions > deine price determination process > define calculation schema
select the pricing procedure
if u click the statistical tab of the particular condition type then the value will flow in the po automatically.but before making the po you have to maintain the condition record through mek1.
try this hope you will face no problem.
Edited by: diptasya jash on May 31, 2008 9:57 AM

Similar Messages

Custom Landing charges in Import PO

Dear Experts
I am using an condition in my import PO called Custom Landing charges , this landing charges will be used for claculation of assessable value purpose only and this condition will not be paid to any vendor nor it will added on the material cost.
Kindly tell me how should I configure this condition.
Thanks

Hi AVID21,
can you check one thing?
Go to table J_1IRG23D, the excise base amt / field name EXBAS should be showing the "assessable value".
can you confirm with me whether is this amount correct in it? or is it just showing the CIF value only?
From the suggestion above, advice to set the "landing charge" condition to statistic will have your net price containing only the CIF value. This will solve your MIGO and MIRO problem since landing charge is not chargeable and should be exclude out from net price.
but the repercussion of it is, it will cause the CIF value to populate into the table J_1IRG23D instead of assessable value.
please check your table J_1IRG23D-EXBAS and let me know whether is the value correct or not
i am also having some issue with this landing charge as well.
thank you.

Customs Landing Charges

Hai Friends,
I have one issue.
I have done Import purchase cycle.
In that cycle Customs landing charges.... is Debited in MIRO( Customs bill booking )
After that My client needs to credit to material cost...
For crediting to material cost what configuration i have to do...
Please guide me...

hi,
I dont think landing charges need to pay to customes authority ?
it should be statastical.
anyways if ur scenario is like this then remove the statastical indicator in pricing assign a/c key to condition type in procedure and assign G/L to account key in OBYC.
regardfs,
sujit

GR/IR Clearing for - Landing and Clearing & Forwarding Charges

Dear Friends
We would like to do GR/IR Clearing for previous year using Transaction code MR11. For Qty and Value difference, clearing
is happenging successfully. But for conditions eg. Landing Charges or Clearing & forwarding charges, MR11 is not picking
the open items from GR/IR Account.
how can lines of conditions can be cleared from GR/IR GL.
SKSomani

Hello,
I have problem with MRKO also.
The requirement is account 408*** should not have partner profit center
I don't understand why the system affect partner PC to this operation in the accounting doc.

Condition type for landing and clearing charges for imports

All SAP Gurus,
Which standard condition type to be for Condition type for landing and clearing charges for imports?
Regards,

If both Condition types are Quantity basis then you can Create New Condition types by Referring FRA1 & FRC1 Condition types.
Else Create New Condition types called ZCCH for Clearing Charges by giving the Following inputs:
Condition class A
Calculation Type A
Condition Category B
Plus/Minus A
Also in Control data Check Accruals option and in Scales tab give Scale Value as 2 if want.
Create New Condition types called ZLNC for Landing Charges by giving the Following inputs:
Condition class A
Calculation Type A
Plus/Minus A
Uncheck Accruals options and save.
Regards,
Ashok

MIRO(STOCK IS DEBITING AND LANDING CHARH=GES ARE GETTING CREDITED)

We have done MIGO fro goods receipt where the following entry is getting passed
Stock A/c Dr
GR/IR A/c CR
Landing charges CR(provisional entry)
When we are doing MIRO the stock is again getting debited and landing chargesa re again getting credited where as it should be the reverse entry.
i.e at the time of MIGO we have passed a provisional entry for landing charges Rs25000. Now at the time of MIRO where my actual landing charges are Rs20000 it should pass the following entry
Landing charges Dr 5000
Stock Cr 5000
whereas it is again passing the first entry by 20000.
Please suggest
Regards,
Sumeet

Hello,
Thanks for your reply. Actually at the time of MIRO it is passing Landing charges as Credit and Stock debit.
Stock Dr
Landing Charges Cr
whereas it should pas the reverse entry.
Does there could be any problem at th time making of PO Conditions as we are using ZLAN Condition type for landing charges in the PO.
I Have tested the scenario in the deveolpment server its going fine,
Could there be a problem in making of PO.
Regards,
Sumeet Chopra

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Import Po service contract

Dear SAP experts,
I have the requirement from the client as per the follows
The import PO is made with the main imported vendor which is verbal (by telephonic,e-mail), The supplier then sends the proforma invoice,and arrange to despatch the goods from his location.
Now my client have made five to six service aggreements on yearly basis with vendors like packing and forwarding vendor,freight vendor, local transporter, clearing agent etc..the charges is on the basis of tonnage ( the PO order unit is in "tonnes"). So when the consignment arrives in india the client contact with all these vendor to transport the goods from indian port to the factory gate. then as per the tonnage quantity in consignment, the payment is made to the respective vendor as per the tonnage charges mentioned in the service aggreements or contracts.
Now in SAP I have to map this process as all the landing charges,transport charges is to be inventorised to the material cost.
so please guide me how i will do this in SAP? as Client is firm for making service aggreements with all these vendors.
Thanks and Regards,
Ravindra
Edited by: Ravi1911 on Oct 4, 2010 12:45 PM
Edited by: Ravi1911 on Oct 4, 2010 12:46 PM

i have done the customization

Import purchase

Hi Gurus
In a scenario of import purchase say i have put a p.o With customs duty and landing charges .Then i am doing MIRO for customs.Then i have done migo in that material valuation is done with lesser price in material master it is maintain as that of p.o price for that period still what it is considering .Please help me .
Thanks & Regards

Hi
While posting gr system ask comertial invoice, put that invoice no. with year created while MIRO transaction.
then check entries.

In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

Re : ADDL EXCISE DUTY

HI GURUS,
CAN ANY1 TELL ME WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR CALCULATING ADDITIONAL EXCISE DUTIES IN IMPORT SCENARIOS?
IS IT THAT ALL DUTIES ARE NEEDED TO BE TAKEN TO calculate addl excise duty?
Please explain with example

Hi,
Additional duty in case of Import is applicable on Total Value.
Ex
Basic + Landing charge (Insurance + Shipment+ Packaging )+ Basic custom 10% + Edu cess on Custom 2% + Higher Edu cess on Custom 1% + CVD Equal to BED 10% + Edu cess on CVD 2% + Higher Edu cess 1 on CVD
On all the above there will be Additional duty 4% .
Rg

Import Scenario

Hi All,
We r using TAXINN for domestic and have maintained combination of Cntry/Planr/ChapterID for condition record using standard access sequence.
Now in case of Import, we have maintained combination of Plant / Pur.Org. for Import conditions using another access sequence.
Now my case is that same material wil be purchase from domestic as well as import market.
So for same material 2 records will be existing.
Now when m procurring that material from Import vendor, as in import vendor import schema is there, its showing Custom conditions in Item detail, condition tab. And in Item detail, Invoice tab its showing values calculated by 1st combination (i.e. from TAXINN)
Now suppose mat is A, price 10$, Qty 100, having Ch ID 1000 11 11, with duty rates as 10,2,1
And for import conditions are suppose CVD 10%, Add.Custom Duty 4%,ECess on CVD 2%, SECess on CVD1%.
So in Condition tab it will show
Net    = 1000$
CVD1= 100$
ECess=2$
SEces=1$.
And in Invoice Tab, it wil show
Net     = 1000$
BED   = 100$
ECess=2$
SEces=1$.
Now after invoice verification for Custom, when m going for GR, in excise tab values are flowing in $, only Add.Custom duty is in RS,
What i guess those values are flowing from TAXINN only.
When I post J1IEX, respective GLs are updated with 100, 2 & 1$.
Now my question is what configuration I m missing so that values are not flowing in Rs at the time of GR itself or at the time of J1IEX?
Pls guide if missing some config.
Thanks.

ZIMPOR - IN: Purchasing for Imported Materials
1     Step     Cntr     CTyp     Description     From     To     Man.     Req     Stat
2     1     1     P000     Gross Price     0     0
3     1     2     P001     Gross Price     0     0
4     10     1     R001     Discount/Quantity     0     0     X
5     10     2     R002     Absolute discount     0     0     X
6     10     3     KR00     Header Disc.(Value)     0     0     X
7     10     4     K000     Contrct HeaderDisc %     0     0
8     10     5     R003     Discount % on Net     0     0     X
9     20               Net including Price& Discount     1     10               X
10     25     0     JOFV     Ocean/AirFreight-Val                         X
11     25     1     JOFP     Ocean/AirFreight-%     20                    X
12     30     0          Net1(Price+ Overseas Fre.)     20     25
13     35          JINS     Import Insurance-%     30                    X
14     40               Sub tot.-Landing Charg.     30     35
15     45     0     JLDC     Customs Landing Charge-%     40                    X
16     50               Assessable Value     40     45
17     55     0     JCDB     IN Basic customs     50
18     60               Sub Total- For CVD     50     55
19     65     0     JCV1     IN CVD     60
20     70     0     JECV     ECess on CVD     65
21     75               Copy of IN Basic Customs      55
22     80     0          BCD + CVD + Edu Cess on CVD     65     75
23     85     0     JEDB     Customs Edu Cess     80
24     90               Sub Total -Add. Cust.Duty     80     85               X
25     95               Copy of Assessable Value     50                    X
26     100          JADC     Add. Customs duty     90     95
27     105               Net 2(NetCus.Dutyothers)                         X
28     110     0     JCFA     Clearing Agent Charge
29     115     0     JFR1     Local Freight Charge     0     0
30     120     0     JFR2     Wharfage , Misc
31     125     0          Landed Cost of Good     105     120

Net value and assesable value

Dear Experts,
In Import pricing procedure we different pricing condition like
1.PACKING AND FORWARDING
2. SUPPLIER INSURANCE
3. OCCAN/ AIR FRIGHT CHARGES
4.IMPORT INSURANCE
5. LANDING CHARGES
to obtain NET VALUE which are pricing condiion value has to added
Please tell me what is difference between Net VALUE and ASSESABLE VALUE,
THIS

Hi,
Net value is basic material price with includes all delivery cost & fright.
Asseable value is
Basic price (% of material value) depent on product & chapter ID. (Custom will provide abetment for product)
Fright (Import)
Insurence cost
Landing cost 1%
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 9, 2010 4:19 PM

IMPORT PO SCENARIO

Hi Gurus,
I am creating a Import PO. In this, I am maintaining the condition Customs Landing charges. when I am doing MIRO, system is picking all the conditions except customs landing charges. where I have to check this?
Can anybody tell the steps in MIGO and MIRO to post the same.
Thanks in advance
KK

Hi
Please check ur pricing schema Landing charges will be marked as statistical, first it should not be statisticsl if u want to post the accounting of Landing charges (to the best of my knowledge it should not be posted this is a staisitical only and used for calculation of Duties) and secondly at the time of MIRO u should select services or goods and services
Best regards
Vineet Baweja

Wrong excise Base in Excise tab in Item details in MIGO for ImportPurchases

Hi All,
We are facing an issue with wrong excise base in transaction MIGO item datails in excise tab,
Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
Case:
In PO ,
             Value in USD     Ex Rate          Value In INR
Assesable value     101                            52.4659          5299.0559
IN Basic customs     10.1          52.4659          529.90559
Sub (*** Value + BCD     111.1          52.4659          5828.96149
IN CVD          11.11                            52.4659          582.896149
In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
But in MIGO in excise tab excise Base is 5,776.50--> which is wrong.
Please help in correcting the same in system.
All relevant configuration and default conditions are maintained in systm.
Regards,
Vijaykumar P

> Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
> In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
Hi, I think your system is showing correct,
Base at the time MIGO will not be Assassable value +BCD, It will only be Assassable value,
Your 1st point is right "Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty"
Assassable value consist of Material cost, Insurance, Freight, 1% Landing charge etc. Check with your Imports team & Excise team for the same.
Apart from that, if your concern is about values then just check the exchange rates & the Miro posting what you have did.

Landing Charges

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for