Ledger specific transactions to be maintained for IFRS reporting

HI
We are involved in the implementation process and need to maintain the leading ledger as per US GAAP and also the ledger required for IFRS reporting. What will be the ledger specific transactions? Sharing same COA, do we need additianl account groups to identify them seperately or what is the procedure? Can a comparison report be generated?Also how is the material ledger maintained?
Please Help V_Shekhar

Hi,
Pls Check this thread
[leading ledger and non-leading ledger|leading ledger and non-leading ledger]
Check this links
[http://sapfico-answers.blogspot.com/2010/02/sap-ecc-60-new-new-gl.html|http://sapfico-answers.blogspot.com/2010/02/sap-ecc-60-new-new-gl.html]
Hope this will Help you!!

Similar Messages

FI configuration for IFRS reporting

Hi Experts
I Need to Configure IFRS Reporting for the asset Module, can you please give me detail information regarding IFRS reporting for Asset module (Indian Scenario)
Moderator: Please, search SDN

If the FG is maintained on price control 'S' i.e. std price, system any way will post the difference to price difference account when you do settlement or order. The relevant account will have to be mainatined in OBYC for PRD.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

Activation of new Non leading ledger for IFRS- Challanges involved

HI
Good Day. I am requesting this qwery on behalf of my company. We are working on SAP ECC 6.0 and the New G/L functionality is activated and additional non leding ledger have been defined for IFRS reporting for some of the company codes rolled out subesequently.
Duriing the implementation , IFRS ledger was not defined for some of the company codes at that point of time. Is it feasible to define the Non leading ledger for IFRS reports now.
If it is possible, how to migrate the opening balance to this ledger. What are the other challanges involved, if we activate the non leading ledger now.
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
Regards.
S K Patra

You want to assign an additional ledger to a company code later on in General Ledger Accounting (new). You have to utlize the functions that are provided by the SAP General Ledger Migration Service.
This falls under Scenario 7: Subsequent implementation of an additional ledger
You need to consider this as a separate project and must prepare and execute this project with the utmost care to ensure accounting is still in order following the activation.
You have to structure accounts and already posted line items of the subsequently implemented ledger, in addition to
consistently changing various interdependent Customizing settings (for example, for General Ledger Accounting and Asset Accounting). SAP provides only a technical migration
Please refer to note 1227504.

Parallel ledger configuaration for IFRS

Hi Guru,
Well I have to Implement IFRS for my canadian client using Parallel Ledger configuaration for this.
If anybody have any configuaration notes in this matter or the way I have to move forward for this.
Thanks in advance
Rahul

Hi,
You have to create a non-leading ledger for IFRS compliance.
1. Create a non leading ledger
2. define and activate non-leading ledger
3. Define the Accounting Principles of this non-leading ledger example
4. Assign this Acctg Principle to Non-leading ledger
5. Define doc types and number range for GL view
After you have established this, the system will simultaneously post to the non-leading ledger... and you can also create the particular financial statement for IFRS reporting. To adjust a particular ACCOUNT to comply with the IFRS adjustments, you can directly adjust them in the non-leading ledger without affecting the original books using FB50L.

Is there any specific Transaction for defining Scale Basis.

Hi All,
Is there any specific Transaction for defining Scale Basis? What is the Table name for the Scales?
Thanks & Regards,
Fedor.

Hi,
You can maintain scale basis in condition record T.Code"VK11", and table in which scales are stored is "KONM"
balu

How to check RBS maintainer is running or not and how to stop the RBS maintainer for a specific content db.

HI
how to check RBS maintainer is running after deleting orphan blobs and while deleting the blobs from rbs storage,
and also how to stop the RBS maintainer for a specific content db.
when I run below query I found the orphancleanup value true
SELECT [config_key],[config_value] FROM [mssqlrbs_resources].[rbs_internal_config]
where config_key='orphan_cleanup_in_progress'
adil

HI
the RBS maintainer was run from one of web front end server And for one content database , that fine
but I now know this information only this did by other administrators.
Now I did not found this Maintainer running in windows task scheduler, but blobs are decreasing from content database RBS storage folder, and　 also I found this maintainer running I checked from when　 run sql queriy in 　sql
server
SELECT
[config_key],[config_value]
FROM
[mssqlrbs_resources].[rbs_internal_config]
where
config_key='orphan_cleanup_in_progress’
it 　given me true
here now I want to stop this orphan cleane up , what settings and script I will run?
adil

Additional Non-Leading Ledger for IFRS implementation

Hi
My client wants to implement IFRS accounting wef 1 April. They already have couple of non-Leading Ledgers operational. Please confirm if the creation of a new non-Leading Ledger for IFRS would serve the purpose. Is it in anyway different from creation of other non-Leading Ledgers for US-GAAP, UK-GAAP ? Also, I would like to know what are all the points to be taken care of while implementing IFRS accounting standard.
Any documentation which would augment for the IFRS implementation in SAP will be of help.
Thank you
RK

Hi Ravi,
Iam not sure about your question but can you tell me what are the activities you carry out now for non-leading ledgers..Do you need to carry out month end closing for that non-leading ledger also???
Thanks,
sai.

Materail not fully maintained for this transaction/event

Dear All,
When i am extending material to new storage Location using MMSC i am getting below error msg.
"materail not fully maintained for this transaction/event" wht may be the reason.
regards
venu gopal

Hi
Check whether material has plant level data ie:any views like MRP, purchasing .
i suppose if material has only basic data 1 and 2 then u may get the below error.
Chk and revert
Reg
Raja

Ledger Group vs. Ledger Specific Document Types

Can anyone tell me the value in having a document type that is purely used for tracking accounting principle specific adjustments (GAAP Adjustments / STAT Adjustments / IFRS Adjustments / etc.)? If you already have various ledger groups hitting various accounting principles using a standard accounting document why would you need a ledger specific document type and when would it be used in normal business transactions instead of using a ledger group / standard accounting doc type combination?

HI,
In my company I set up IFRS-leading ledger, 2 local ledgers for each comp. code.
Accounting key-user found it easier and more traceable to make ledger specific postings using one special doc.type / number range for each ledger (group). "normal" doc. types can only be used to make posting in all ledgers assigned to each comp. code.
With this setting they can easy identify ledger group specific postings from postings happened to all ledgers using the same account number.
But,as you mentioned, its not really necessary to do so.
BR Christian

Error while executing the transaction QC22 (Quality Certificate for Batch)

Hello Friends,
While executing the transaction QC22(Quality Certificate for Batch), after giving the Batch Number and Customer Number, when i am executing it , system is throwing the error message as "Not all data was found for characteristic 90139982 in profile D80D8".
Message no. ZQ010
Diagnosis
Not all data was found for characteristic 90139982, referenced as number 0030 in certificate profile D80D8. The missing data could be the short text, specifications, or results.
System Response
The missing charactertistic will not be printed on the certificate,
Procedure
Review the settings for data orgin of the short text, specifications, and results, and adjust accordingly.
One more thing i would like to add here as against the same batch in april we had taken the print of COA (Quality Certificate) through the transaction QC22. But now we are trying to do that than system is thrown above mentioned error.
As i am new in QM, kindly explain we were to maintain the certificate profile.
Waiting for the experts inputs.
Thanks and Regards,
Jitendra Chauhan

Hi
Try with QA33 you may have display authorization, or check in MB51 on the base of material and batch you can find the lot number generated, then go to QA03 and check the result, if you want to validate the characters check with the inspection plan, the characters entered in the inspection plan and the characters in the concerned certificate profile.
Regards
Naveen.
Edited by: vaddapalli naveen on Jul 1, 2010 1:57 PM

Transaction code for Depricitation Report

Hi,
we have asset accouting with WDV Method & maintaing our books as per F.Y. April to March
But, due to foreign investor's investment, we have need to closed our books, twicely, i.e. IFRS - F.Y.-Jan to Dec / ( US gap ) & Indian gap, FY. April to March.
Currently, We are using, AR03 trasaction to view the Depriciation Report (Asset Register)
My problem is, when we run the Deprication report for IFRS Books closing, we could't get report, properly, because of our F.Y. maintan April to March.
in that case we have need to maintain Manually on XLS.
Please tell me any transaction code for depriciation report for IFRS Books closing as well as Indian Gap.
Thanks
Regards
Jitendra

dont you have an option in there to run based on your depreciation area? Select your depreciation area and the report date based on your fiscal year variant. Optionally, you can also try reports like S_ALR_87012006 - Ordinary Depreciation, and S_P99_41000192 - Posted depreciation by asset and posting period with depreciation area selection.

How shadow accounting for IFRS can be done

Hello all,
When cost of implementation of IFRS are huge and requires new G/L, Is it possible to have a shadow accounting practise.
Lets say we create a financial statement version based on IFRS accounting structure.
1. how the apc posting to be made for IFRS depreciation ares.
2. how the depreciation will be posted in this case if the IFRS depreciation area is made as real.
Regards,
Keith.

Hi Keith --- First a couple of points for you. I would not necessarily assume the cost of IFRS adoption will be "huge" as the cost and complexity of the project will be dependant on your own existing landscape and the industry and country where you will be adopting IFRS. Really the best way to scope the complexity and cost of the IFRS adoption project is to work closely with your audit/consulting partner and SAP to really determine what the best course of action should be. Basically, the sooner you engage the better as it will save time and money.
Regarding you second point regarding the SAP General Ledger (NewGL). Although it is the recommend solution it is not a requirement. There are other solutions available that utilize a single ledger approach. For example the use of the "Account Based" configuration approach for the GL and utilizing the reporting capabilities found within SAP BusinessObjects may be the best approach for your situation. See SAP and IFRS: FAQ document at https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60eecedc-7ff0-2b10-b2be-c329c1114298
As far a reporting from a "Shadow Accounting Practice" the SAP General Ledger does offer the ability to set up multiple ledgers which can be used for reporting on different accounting standards. For example set the Leading Ledger to report on IFRS and another non-leading ledger to report on Local GAAP. If it turns out that the adoption of the SAP General Ledger is not the best course of action at present then you could use the tools found within SAP BusinessObjects to report on the various legal options.
As far as IFRS reporting from the Depreciation Areas goes, this would require the set up of multiple deprecation areas tied to separate ledger or specific account groups within your Chart of Accounts. Again for more specific information regarding this questions I would suggest contacting your audit/consulting partner or SAP Field Services for further guidance

"Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2011" (OAOB)

Hi
I have configure in Asset Accounting
Step1: copy reference chart of depreciation/depreciation areas
Step2: creation of 0% tax code for sales and purchases
Step3: Assign tax code fo non taxable transactions.
and step 4 not accepting to Assign chart of Depreciation to company code!!!!!!!!
showing error "Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2011"
and then i try all the below steps
while i assigning chart of depreciation to company code, it showing error
"Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2011"
i try below all steps but still error,
SE16 -T093c-- BUKRS --- company code
showing " No table entries found fr specified key"
OAYH not display company code,
AJRW showing " This processing can only be carried out as a background prcessing.
OABL showing " Company code not deined for Asset Accounting"
OB22 Deleted parallel currencies also.
OAAQ company code -- closed fisical year not showing.
one of sdn user advise me to copy COD to your company code & assign this COD to Company code (OAOB).
how to copy COD.. What is this???? iam not understanding ..
can any body advise me how to resolve my problem.
Regards

Dear kumarreddy1274
Copy Reference Chart of Depreciation/Depreciation Areas
In this step, you define your charts of depreciation. The chart of depreciation is a list of depreciation areas arranged according to business and legal requirements. The chart of depreciation enables you to manage all rules for the valuation of assets in a particular country or economic region.
You must assign a chart of depreciation to each company code that is defined in Asset Accounting. SAP provides country-specific charts of depreciation with predefined depreciation areas. These charts of depreciation serve only as a reference for creating your own charts of depreciation, and are therefore not directly accessible in the SAP system. When creating a chart of depreciation, you have to copy the reference chart of depreciation
Regards
shankar

How to monitor a specific transaction in Solution Manager ?

Hi all,
I have configured the Service Level Reporting and it works correctly.
But i don't know how to monitor a specific transaction like SM21, DB02, FB01N etc... ?
In the SL Reports configuration steps, we can configure this option : Select Business Processes For SL Report. I did a lot of tests but it does not work.
Have i to configure the Business Process Monitoring ?
Thanks.

Hello,
it depends a little on what you want to do. If you use the pure CCMS monitoring with the table ALTRAMONI you get average response time per instance and you only get new measurements once the status changes from green to yellow or red.
In order to get continuous measurements you should look into Business Process Monitoring and the different documentations under https://service.sap.com/bpm --> Media Libary --> Technical Information. E.g. the PDF Setup Guide for Application Monitoring describes this "newer" dialog performance monitor. Probably you have to click on the calendar sheet in the Media Libary to also see older documents as well. As the Business Process Monitoring integrates with BW (there is also a BI Setup Guide in the Media LIbrary) you can get trendlines there. This BW integration also integrates back with SL Reporting.
Some guidance for SL Reporting is probably given under https://service.sap.com/rkt-solman but I am not 100% sure.
Best Regards
Volker

Re: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update

Dale,
Sounds like you either need an "optimistic locking" scheme, usually
implemented with timestamps at the database level, or a concurrency manager.
A concurrency manager registers objects that may be of interest to multiple
users in a central location. It takes care of notifying interested parties
(i.e., clients,) of changes made to those objects, using a "notifier" pattern.
The optimistic locking scheme is relatively easy to implement at the
database level, but introduces several problems. One problem is that the
first person to save their changes "wins" - every one else has to discard
their changes. Also, you now have business policy effectively embedded in
the database.
The concurrency manager is much more flexible, and keeps the policy where
it probably belongs. However, it is more complex, and there are some
implications to performance when you get to the multiple-thousand-user
range because of its event-based nature.
Another pattern of lock management that has been implemented is a
"key-based" lock manager that does not use events, and may be more
effective at managing this type of concurrency for large numbers of users.
There are too many details to go into here, but I may be able to give you
more ideas in a separate note, if you want.
Don
At 04:48 PM 6/5/97 PDT, Dale "V." Georg wrote:
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save'button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
>
>
>
>
====================================
Don Nelson
Senior Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
Denver, CO
Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
aka: [email protected]
====================================
"I think nighttime is dark so you can imagine your fears with less
distraction." - Calvin

We have taken an optimistic data locking approach. Retrieved values are
stored as initial values; changes are stored seperately. During update, key
value(s) or the entire retieved set is used in a where criteria to validate
that the data set is still in the initial state. This allows good decoupling
of the data access layer. However, optimistic locking allows multiple users
to access the same data set at the same time, but then only one can save
changes, the rest would get an error message that the data had changed. We
haven't had any need to use a pessimistic lock.
Pessimistic locking usually involves some form of open session or DBMS level
lock, which we haven't implemented for performance reasons. If we do find the
need for a pessimistic lock, we will probably use cached data sets that are
checked first, and returned as read-only if already in the cache.
-DFR
Dale V. Georg <[email protected]> on 06/05/97 03:25:02 PM
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
cc: Richards* Debbie <[email protected]> @ INTERNET, Gardner*
Steve <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save' button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for
any
ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from pebble.Sagesoln.com by notes.bsginc.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1997Jun05.162418.1771.334203; Thu, 05 Jun 1997 16:24:19 -0500
Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11825 for forte-users-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:58 -0700
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11819 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:56 -0700
Received: from unknown(207.159.84.4) by pebble.sagesoln.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma011817; Thu Jun 5 13:47:43 1997
Received: from tes0001.macktrucks.com by relay.macktrucks.com
via smtpd (for pebble.sagesoln.com [206.80.24.108]) with SMTP; 5 Jun
1997 19:35:31 UT
Received: from dale by tes0001.macktrucks.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id QAA04637; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:45:51 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Priority: Normal
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]>
Cc: "Richards," Debbie <[email protected]>,
"Gardner," Steve <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 97 16:48:37 PDT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>

Ledger specific transactions to be maintained for IFRS reporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for