Activation of new Non leading  ledger for IFRS- Challanges involved

HI
Good Day. I am  requesting this  qwery on behalf of my company.   We are working on SAP ECC 6.0 and the  New G/L functionality  is activated and  additional non leding ledger  have been  defined for  IFRS reporting for some  of the company codes rolled out subesequently.
Duriing the implementation , IFRS ledger was not defined for some of the company codes at that point of time. Is it  feasible  to define the  Non leading ledger for IFRS reports now.
If it is  possible, how to migrate the  opening balance to this ledger. What are  the  other challanges involved, if we activate the non  leading ledger now.
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
Regards.
S K Patra

You want to assign an additional ledger to a company code later on in General Ledger Accounting (new). You have to utlize the functions that are provided by the SAP General Ledger Migration Service. 
This falls under Scenario 7: Subsequent implementation of an additional ledger
You need to consider this as a separate project and must prepare and execute this project with the utmost care to ensure accounting is still in order following the activation.
You have to structure accounts and already posted line items of the subsequently implemented ledger, in addition to
consistently changing various interdependent Customizing settings (for example, for General Ledger Accounting and Asset Accounting). SAP provides only a technical migration
Please refer to note 1227504.

Similar Messages

  • Additional Non-Leading Ledger for IFRS implementation

    Hi
    My client wants to implement IFRS accounting wef 1 April. They already have couple of non-Leading Ledgers operational. Please confirm if the creation of a new non-Leading Ledger for IFRS would serve the purpose. Is it in anyway different from creation of other non-Leading Ledgers for US-GAAP, UK-GAAP ? Also, I would like to know what are all the points  to be taken care of while implementing IFRS accounting standard.
    Any documentation which would augment for the IFRS implementation in SAP will be of help.
    Thank you
    RK

    Hi Ravi,
    Iam not sure about your question but can you tell me what are the activities you carry out now for non-leading ledgers..Do you need to carry out month end closing for that non-leading ledger also???
    Thanks,
    sai.

  • Define a new non leading ledger

    Hi SAP gurus,
    our customer uses sap erp 6.0,
    new gl is active but there is only one legder (this is leading ledger 0L) is active. now I want to define a new ledger for IFRS purposes.
    are there any special points that should I consider?
    should i use new gl migration?
    Moderator: Please, search SDN

    generally when we upload the opening balance to leading ledger automatically update non leading ledgers based on the accounting rules given at your configuration. but your case after updated opening balance, you have created/activated new non leading ledger, i am not sure just try in development, down load the opening balance from leading ledger and upload the balance to new non leading ledger by select the new ledger group by using BDC or any other program, take your abaper help

  • Posting entry into non leading ledger for already closed books

    Hi
    We have two ledgers - Leading (as per IGAAP) and Non Leading (IFRS)
    Now there is Rs. 54Lacs expenses which are pertaining to March 2010. This expenses are being booked in October 2010
    Now as per IFRS, i need to re-instate this amount in March 2010
    So i want to pass this entry for IFRS ledger only in fiscal year which is already closed and carry forward
    So what should i do now?
    Should i open the posting period for March 2010 (last closed fiscal year). Is it possible ?
    If i open and post the entries, do i need to carry forward the balances again for IFRS Ledger ?

    Hi Meenu,
    You need to open the posting period 3 of 2010 and post entry only in the non Leading ledger of IFRS. When you post entry it will automatically be reflected in the current year.
    Secondly, the carry forward transaction does no harm even if you run it again..
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • New non-leading ledger creation

    Hi,
    The new non-leading ledger to be created as per the client's requirement.  Can we create new non-leading ledger later on.  The old data to be posted to new non-leading ledger.
    Can someone throw light on this issue?
    What can be done please suggest.
    Thanks
    Satya

    Hi Satya,
    Please go through the following notes
    SAP Note 1227504 - Subsequent implementation of an additional ledger
    SAP Note 1229202 - Subsequent implementation of an additional ledger
    Please search forum well as this topic has been discussed many times.
    Regards
    Eugene

  • New non-leading ledger activation

    We are in SAP since last one year.  Now i want to add one Non-leading ledger which is to be assigned to the existing copany code.  It is possible, if it, how.

    Hi,
    1: never did it on my own (but who knows what comes next...).
    2: Guess its possible by doing
    2 a: all the customization required for other local ledgers
    2 b: and after excessive testing (!!!) transporting the changes to P-client at a time with no posting activity.
    The best time to do so is the night before the new fiscal year begins to ensure that all postings regarding the new fiscal year are within the new ledger.
    Nevertheless you need to bring opening balance to the new ledger (group) exclusively using specific posting transactions like FB01L, ABF1L,...) and you will have postings regarding the old fiscal year (for fiscal year end-closing).
    Maybe you can create a ledger group for the old ledgers and make a substitution rule that old fiscal year postings only happen in the old ledgers, to keep the new ledger "clean".
    As I said, I never did it, but it doesn't sound impossible although I guess its a lot of work...
    Best regards, Christian

  • Difference in ABST2 in non leading ledger for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL

    Hi,
    While executing ABST2 there is difference in our non leading ledger ,we have recently created new dep. area 33 which updates the values in 2nd LC AA for non leading ledger but value in  2nd LC GL is different from what we have in Asset for non leading ledger Z1 .
    When we check in FAGLL03 for Z1 ledger  we came to know that Asset balance is updated from Local currency and GL values are updated from 2nd Local currency ,but in 2nd Local currency system has not post any entry and due to this there is difference.
    We want the same value in non leading ledger Z1 for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL.
    Please let me know if there is any specefic settings required for the same.
    We have mantain dep area 34 also as per SAP Note 1433535 but still there is difference in ABST2.
    Thanks
    Akshata

    Hello Akshata,
    If you want to setup a scenario in Fixed Asset Accounting, where
    you post different valuations (local GAAP / IFRS) to a different ledger
    group in G/L for parallel valuation, then you have to use (in total) 3
    depreciation areas in the following way. For each additional "valuation"
    for which you have additional ledgers defined in G/L, and for which you
    want to get different values as those posted in area 01, you need also
    two additional depreciation areas (1 real and and 1 derived area) in
    asset accounting.
    Please consider a correct definition of a parallel ledger scenario
    is as follow: this is an example only
                               Posting to G/L         Ledger
    Area 01 HGB                        1                   0L    > STATUTORY
    Area XX IAS                          3                   LG    > (IAS)
    Area YY (IAS - HGB)             5 or 6              LG    > (IAS)
    Acquisition/transf/retirement postings in area 01 go to all ledgers
    independently of your setting in OADB. And, if any difference occurs
    between area 01 an area XX this is posted trough the derived area YY
    (posting indicator 6).
    This is the parallel ledger scenario logic and how the techinal
    solution to this requirement was developped.
    You can find more documentation about the so-called "Ledger Scenario" in
    Asset Accounting for the purpose of parallel valuation in the SAP Help
    Portal. You may find these links helpful:
    a) Parallel Accounting in Asset Accounting
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/91/09f5400e517e7fe1000000
    0a1550b0/content.htm
    b) Parallel Valuation
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71ea61448011d189f000
    00e81ddfac/content.htm
    c) Making Settings for Parallel Ledgers in FI-AA
         > this one documents my above explanation
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/0d/de3d83c78b48a28a44ad92
    14239d57/content.htm
    d) Example: Parallel Accounting and the Derived Depreciation Area
         > this one describes how the derived area acts in the scenario
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/37/ebad814b3347e9bc5182c0
    56d5bbd8/content.htm
    kind regards
    Ray

  • Subsequent Activation of Non Leading Ledger

    Dear Experts,
    We are now in 6.0 version of SAP with New GL and Profit Centre Document Splittings. Our Leading Ledger is for Local Indina GAAP. Now we want to create new non leading ledger for IFRS.
    Whether we will take help of SAP for migration of old account balances beacuse we will create non leading ledger on 01.06.10 and we went go live on 01.02.2008.
    Or we should take help of any consulting firm for implemnentation as we know any how for balance transfer to non leading ledger SAP migration tool to be used.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Alok

    Hi,
    Many different migration scenarios are imaginable for the transition from classic General
    Ledger Accounting to new General Ledger Accounting, ranging from the straightforward
    merge of existing ledgers to a totally new conception of accounting, such as the introduction
    of segment reporting for compliance with new accounting principles. In particular in the case
    of a new conception of accounting, there are two aspects to the transition to new General
    Ledger Accounting: firstly, a conceptual business part, and secondly, a technical part dealing
    with the migration of the existing accounting data to the new structures for General Ledger
    Accounting.
    The new features relate to very extensive changes, the transition to new General Ledger
    Accounting is very complex, and the data volume involved is not to be underestimated. A
    comprehensive analysis of your situation at the outset and the detailed planning of the
    migration are crucial to the success of the migration.
    We therefore recommend setting up an individual project for the migration,
    entailing project phases, milestones, and so forth, and taking the appropriate
    steps to ensure sufficient testing and training.
    To achieve a high degree of safety in this respect, SAP accompanies each migration project
    with the SAP General Ledger Migration Service. This mandatory technical service relates to
    the standard migration scenarios and contains a scenario-specific General Ledger Migration
    Cockpit and service sessions to ensure the quality of the data and of the migration project.
    The service sessions are performed by the General Ledger Migration Back Office that has
    been set up especially for this purpose.
    Hence please contact SAP consulting for this Activity...
    Regards
    Manu
    SAP GD

  • Ledger Group field NOT showing in FB03 after activating Non- Leading ledger

    Dear All Experts,
    I have activated non leading ledger for my company code and posted the document successfully from FB60. Now coming to FB03 I can see the document in Local Currency and Group Currency - USD but the Ledger Group field still shows complete blank. As I guess it MUST show 1F ( Non Leadig Ledger ) which is my non leading ledger.
    Where I missed the configurtation step ? If anybody has gone through the same issue please guide or provide some inputs.
    Regards,
    Revati Joshi.

    Non-leading ledger use t codes FB01L and FB50L
    The reason that the Ledger Group 0L is being used it´s because the Accouting Principle of your Valuation Area.
    What you have to do is you need to create a new Ledger Group and assgn it to your valutaion area.
    Then you assign this accounting principle to the valution area.
    Then assign the accounting principle to no Ledger Group.
    Please see the customizing path:
    Define new Ledger Group:
    Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Ledgers>Ledger>Define Ledgers for General Ledger Accounting (dont active your new ledger as leading ledger. leave the standard as the leading )
    Assign Accounting Principle to none New Gl Group:
    Financial Accounting (New)>General Ledger Accounting (New)>Periodic Processing>Valuate>Check Assignment of Accounting Principle to Ledger Group
    Assign your Valuation Area to the accounting principel just assigned to none NewGL Group:
    Financial Accounting (New)>General Ledger Accounting (New)>Periodic Processing>Valuate>Assign Valuation Areas and Accounting Principles
    Now you have more then one Ledger Group in you client (which is not being used for nothing) and you have a valuation area that is linked to a Accounting Principle that is linked to no Ledger Group.
    Go ahead now and execute the FAGLF101. You will see that the standard will not try to inform leading ledger in the Group of Ledger.
    I found this solutiong debbuging the standard. Took me quite a bit to discover.
    The problem was in SPRO->Financial Accounting(New)->General Ledger Accounting(New)->Periodic Processing->Valuate->Check Assignment of Accounting Principle to Ledger Group. In "Target Ledger Group" field, the ledger "0L" were configured in BRAP and GAAP. So, the system automatically assigned the ledger "0L" when performing FAGLF101.

  • Adding Non-Leading Ledger after Go Live

    Greetings SAP'ers,
    We are 2 months live with one of our Central American entities and we have New GL active, document splitting, etc., and now we find out we need a non-leading ledger for one of the countries for local reporting.  Does anyone have experience adding a non-leading ledger after go-live?  And if so, what are the implications of the documents already posted to that company code.  Is there a migration of posted documents?  The documentation is unclear as to whether this can be done.
    Please let me know your experience.
    Thanks,
    Jim Steinle

    Hello
    As far as I know, One company many company codes can have only one leading ledgers and non leading ledgers for each company code.
    In your case, you have not assigned a ledger to the company code. So the data must have been in the leading ledger.
    And now if you assign, all the data henceforth would go to the ledger, but not sure of the past data.
    Suggest you to create in quality and test check.
    If it does not work out, then there should be note specifying a program to revive the data from leading ledger ?
    Reg
    *assign points if useful / I am not sure if it is really useful

  • Reposting from Leading ledger to non leading ledger using RGURECGLFLEX

    Hi,
    We have a situation where we are trying to post documents from 2007 that are in the leading ledger to a non-leading ledger. When we run the report RGURECGLFLEX it produces a list of documents that cannot be posted with the error "Document NI1N 4900000000 2007 is not relevant for your target ledger ZR"
    When we did some investigation we found that the ledger group was specified with the leading ledger 0L on this and many other documents.
    Is there a way that we can get these documents to post to the non leading ledger and ignore ledger group field / functionality? 
    Do we need to go through and remove the ledger group 0L on each of the postings and re-run the report RGURECGLFLEX?
    We are looking forward to a solution
    Thanks & Regards
    Martin Weakley

    Hi Martin,
    From the SAP Service market place you should find a document
    [https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000688032&]
    FAQsGeneral Ledger in mySAPERPSolution
    In this document you will see the following section "Parallel Financial Accounting and Ledgers"
    under which you will see the following stated
    If a customer decides to use the New GL but only initially uses a single parallel
    ledger (the leading Ledger). The customer then processes some transactions
    for a few months and then decides to use an additional ledger onthe system. Is
    there a program that you can run to enable retrospective postingto a new non-
    leading ledger?
    SAP offers a service called SAP General Ledger Migration. For detail please see
    chapter u201CMiscellaneousu201D.
    More Information regarding u201CSAP General Ledger Migrationu201Dcan be accessed
    using the quick link u2018GLMIGu2019on the SAP Service Marketplace (
    http://service.sap.com/GLMIG). Please also see OSS-note 812919
    with kind regards
    Cora

  • Need to consolidate based on non leading ledger using EC-CS

    Hi Guys
    I have a issue, our leading ledger for various company code is based on local GAAP and the non leading ledger is based on US GAAP for the all the company codes
    Now we are in the process of implementing consolidation using EC-CS
    Consolidation should be based on the Non leading ledger transaction details
    Any idea or lights on the same
    Thanks in advance
    Warm Regards
    Bala

    Hi Martin,
    From the SAP Service market place you should find a document
    [https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000688032&]
    FAQsGeneral Ledger in mySAPERPSolution
    In this document you will see the following section "Parallel Financial Accounting and Ledgers"
    under which you will see the following stated
    If a customer decides to use the New GL but only initially uses a single parallel
    ledger (the leading Ledger). The customer then processes some transactions
    for a few months and then decides to use an additional ledger onthe system. Is
    there a program that you can run to enable retrospective postingto a new non-
    leading ledger?
    SAP offers a service called SAP General Ledger Migration. For detail please see
    chapter u201CMiscellaneousu201D.
    More Information regarding u201CSAP General Ledger Migrationu201Dcan be accessed
    using the quick link u2018GLMIGu2019on the SAP Service Marketplace (
    http://service.sap.com/GLMIG). Please also see OSS-note 812919
    with kind regards
    Cora

  • Difference between Leading ledger and Non-Leading ledger

    Dear friends,
    what is the main difference between Leading ledger and Non-leading ledger in New G/L.
    Thanks in advance,
          Babu.

    This concept is introduced in SAP Ecc6.0
    Many companies have to maintain books for more than two fiscal years (For example 31st December as per companies act & 31st March as per income tax Act).
    So leading ledger & non leading concept helps in maintianing same.
    Leading Ledger is the ledger in which all the entries are posted originally. From Leading ledger all entries flow into non keading ledger. You need not pass entries seprately in leading or non leading ledger.
    In case your leading ledger is Jan to December, January will be the 1st period & so on.
    In case your non leading ledger is April to March, April will be 1st period.
    Also, The leading ledger is based on the same accounting principle as that of the consolidated financial statement.
    The non-leading ledgers are parallel ledgers to the leading ledger. They can be based for example on local accounting principles
    Leading ledger is integrated with all subsidiary ledgers and is updated in all company codes. This means that it is automatically assigned to all company codes.
    In each company code, the leading ledger receives exactly the same settings that apply to that company code currencies, FYV and posting periods. You can define a second and third parallel currency for your leading ledger for each company code.
    Non-leading ledgers are parallel ledgers to the leading ledger. They can be based on a local accounting principle of a country, ex: You have to activate a non-leading ledger for the individual company codes.
    Regards

  • Whether Non leading ledger will have copy of Leading ledger transactions?

    Hi,
    I have basic understanding about leading and non leading ledgers. My question to the forum is whether non leading ledger will have copy of leading ledger transactions meaning whether entries posted from other modules like SD,MM,PP will be available in both leading and non leading ledger or how it will be saved in system. Then if  I post any entries only in non leading ledger, for particular set of GL's and If I want to view the GL balances line item wise (with entry posted in non leading ledger) how can i view it.
    Regards
    Karthikeyan G

    Hi karthik,
    The postings in different ledgers happen through Ledger groups.
    Say you have one Leading ledger - 0L and two non leading Ledgers N1 & N2
    In Configuration you define ledger groups
    You can have a single 0L Ledger in a ledger group or you can have all the three ledgers in a ledger group
    At the time of transaction posting in FI, you have the option to enter ledger group also. If you dont enter any ledger group, then entries will flow in all the ledgers, and if you enter a ledger group where only 0L is included, then it will flow only in 0L and when you use a ledger group where one leading and one non leading ledger is included, it would flow to only two ledgers.
    For entries from MM, SD or other modules, you dont have the option of entering ledger groups, so entries will reflect in all ledgers.
    Regards,
    kavita

  • Non leading ledger (V3) shows wrong fiscal year

    Hi All,
    I am using leading ledger for USA (K4) and Non-leading ledger for local GAAP, India (V3). while posting into Asset Accounting, it is recorded properly bu when i am executing report for Asset accounting, i am geting the information in V3 for 2011 fiscal year which supposed to be in 2010.
    Can anyone help me to resolve it.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sukant

    HI,
    check SAPNET notes 844029 and 1175751 they describe the SAP standard system behaviour and what you can do.
    best regards, Christian

Maybe you are looking for