Liability account column/table

Hello all,
We are running Oracle EBS R12. I am trying to determine, when a supplier is created and a liability account is assigned, where in the DB is it stored? I know it is probably linked to the GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS table, but can run a query, by say, vendor_id and get the liability account that's assigned to that vendor?
Thanks in advance,
Astrid

Morning 178Ponies,
Thank you for your reply. For some reason, that column (ACCTS_PAY_CODE_COMBINATION_ID) is empty for all of the AP_SUPPLIERS records in our DB :(
Anyhow, I found a workaround to make my query work.
Thank you anyway!
Astrid

Similar Messages

Where to get Liability-Account for AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS in R12

I am working on a "AP Report" and I have to display the Expense and Liaiblity accounts for each Invoice_Distribution.
In R11i, this was available from ACCTS_PAY_CODE_COMBINATION_ID from ap_invoice_distributions_all table. However, in R12.1.3 this column is Null and oracle TRM states that this column is "not in use".
Where can i get the Liability-Account in R12 ... If someone has a Query to extract the Liability-account for each Distribution, it would make my life much easier.

Please see:
Identifying Data Model Changes Between EBS 12.1.3 and Prior EBS Releases
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_data_model_1213
EBS Data Model Comparison Report Overview [ID 1290886.1]
EBS Seed Data Comparison Reports Now Available
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_seed_data_comparison_reports
Thanks,
Hussein

AP Liability Account in R12

Hi,
I'm customizing AP Trial Balance report, i need to add a field (Liability Account). Could you tell from which table has this information.
Thanks
pravin

Hi,
Use the below Query to get the
Liability_Account
select concatenated_segments Liability_Account
from gl_code_combinations_kfv
where gl_account_type = 'L'
and enabled_flag = 'Y'
and code_combination_id = your code combination id or you need to derive it from suppliers or supplier sites, in that this column corresponds to ACCTS_PAY_CODE_COMBINATION_ID
When you are deriving from supplier sites use org_id, Since sites are org specific.
This may solve your requirement
Regards,
Giri

SRM 7.0 Add Fields in Account Assignment Table

Hi SRM Gurus,
I am working on SRM7.0.
I want to add two fields in Account Assignment Table in Account assignment tab of Shopping cart Item.
I can do it using WebDynpro Enhancement framework , i.e.
1) Create an append structure for Structure INCL_EEW_PD_ACC_CSF
2) Enhance WebDynpro Component : /SAPSRM/WDC_UI_DO_ACC - Component controller node
3) Map this with View V_DO_ACCOUNTING Node
4) Create the necessary Table Columns and Column editors in Account Assignment Table
However i think using SPRO configuration and enhancing few structures also this can be achieved.
Can anyone guide me on how can i achieve it without creating WebDynpro ABAP Enhancement?
Regards,
Ashish Shah

I've never done it with account data, but yes with header and item.
I think in this case you need to add these fields in SPRO:
SAP Supplier Relationship Management --> SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Extensions and Field Control (Personalization) --> Configure Field Control --> Configure Control for Fields of Substructures --> Metadata for Fields of Substructures and Table-Like Enhancements
Adding the fields with "Set Type" = 31 Accounting...

Supplier balances belonging to the respective liability account.

Hi All,
Can any one help us to know ,from which tables we can extract data for "supplier balances belonging to the respective liability account on an "as of date"". Standard reports are based on system date will provide the date. For example: If my sysdate is 18th Aug 2009 and I would like to extract supplier balances as on 11th May 2009. How I will get ? Do we have any query for the same.
Thanks in advance,
Ram.

Hello.
Please check if this query solves your issue:
SELECT v.vendor_name, cc.segment1||'.'||cc.segment2||'.'||cc.segment3||'.'||cc.segment4 "Liability Account", SUM (alb.accounted_cr) - SUM (alb.accounted_dr) "Balance Due"
FROM ap_liability_balance alb, po_vendors v, gl_code_combinations cc
WHERE trunc(accounting_date) <= 'desired as_of_date'
AND alb.ORG_ID = <your org_id>
AND v.vendor_id = alb.vendor_id
AND cc.code_combination_id = alb.code_combination_id
AND alb.code_combination_id = <ccid of the desired liability account>
GROUP BY v.vendor_name, cc.segment1||'.'||cc.segment2||'.'||cc.segment3||'.'||cc.segment4
HAVING SUM (accounted_cr) != SUM (accounted_dr)
Hope this helps.
Octavio
Edited by: OctopusRex on Aug 18, 2009 2:06 AM
Edited by: OctopusRex on Aug 18, 2009 2:07 AM

*RUN_ALLOCATION writes an entity into the ACCOUNT column

Hi there,
We had the following allocation logic working properly in 7.0 SP5:
*RUNALLOCATION
*DIM ACCOUNT WHAT=INFBASE; WHERE=[PARENTH1]='INFLATIONADJ';
*DIM ENTITY WHAT=NOENTITY; WHERE=%ENTITY_SET%;
*ENDALLOCATION
which simply consists in copying an account stored on NOENTITY to few other accounts on selected entities.
After we upgraded to SP7, the same logic behaved differently and started sending the destination entity in the ACCOUNT column of the fact table.
We investigated the debug log file and noticed that when it reads the destination area, it is able to select the correct destination account:
select [ACCOUNT],[ACCTDETAIL],[CATEGORY],[DATASRC],[ENTITY],[GROUPS],[INTCO],[TIMEID],[UNIT],SIGNEDDATA
into #210
from tblFactFINANCE
where [ACCOUNT] in ('INFELECTARIFFADJ','INFSTEAMTARIFFADJ','INFCDMCDXADJ','INFCAPEXADJ','INFOPEXADJ','INFFUELPRICEADJ','INFOTHERSADJ') and [ACCTDETAIL] = 'F_CLO' and [CATEGORY] = 'CORPPLAN' and [DATASRC] = 'INPUT' and [ENTITY] in ('JY2','JY3') and [GROUPS] = 'LC' and [INTCO] = 'NON_INTERCO' and [TIMEID] in ('10000167','10000168','10000169','10000170','10000171') and [UNIT] = 'NOUNIT'
insert into #210 ([ACCOUNT],[ACCTDETAIL],[CATEGORY],[DATASRC],[ENTITY],[GROUPS],[INTCO],[TIMEID],[UNIT],SIGNEDDATA)
select [ACCOUNT],[ACCTDETAIL],[CATEGORY],[DATASRC],[ENTITY],[GROUPS],[INTCO],[TIMEID],[UNIT],SIGNEDDATA
from tblFactWBFINANCE
but when it merges the source with the destination, then it wrongly associate the entity dimension with the ACCOUNT column:
-- Merge WHAT with destination MEMBERS into WHERE2
select r.ID as ACCOUNT,w.ACCTDETAIL,w.CATEGORY,w.DATASRC,r.ID as ENTITY,w.GROUPS,w.INTCO,w.TIMEID,w.UNIT,amtWHAT,amtWHAT*0 as amtWHERE
into #WHERE2_210 from #WHAT_210 w,mbrENTITY r
where
r.ID in ('JY2','JY3')
Is this a defect? Or has the syntax for a destination based on a property changed since 7.0 SP5?
Thanks,
Regis

Hi Marvin,
I validated the script as you suggest.
LGF
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=LC
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DATASRC=INPUT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=NON_INTERCO
*XDIM_MEMBERSET UNIT=NOUNIT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCTDETAIL=F_CLO
*RUNALLOCATION
*DIM ACCOUNT WHAT=INFBASE; WHERE=[PARENTH1]='INFLATIONADJ',
*DIM ENTITY WHAT=NOENTITY; WHERE=%ENTITY_SET%;
*ENDALLOCATION
*COMMIT
LGX
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=LC
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DATASRC=INPUT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=NON_INTERCO
*XDIM_MEMBERSET UNIT=NOUNIT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCTDETAIL=F_CLO
*RUN_ALLOCATION @A_1|||ACCOUNT WHAT=INFBASE; WHERE=[PARENTH1]='INFLATIONADJ',|ENTITY WHAT=NOENTITY; WHERE=%ENTITY_SET%;|
*COMMIT
Note that I isolated this allocation rule in a single script logic. So you are seeing the whole thing.
Thanks
Regis
Edited by: Regis Cabaret on Aug 2, 2010 10:07 AM

CE function to get distinct values from Column table

Hi All,
Could you please let me know the appropriate CE function to get the distinct values from column table.
IT_WORK = SELECT DISTINCT AUFNR FROM :IT_WO_DETAILS;
Thank you.

Hi,
If you have 10g, you can use Model( with model performance is better than connect by )
Solution
========================================================================
WITH t AS
(SELECT '0989.726332, 1234.567432, 3453.736379, 3453.736379, 0989.726332, 3453.736379, 1234.567432, 1234.567432, 0989.726332'
txt
FROM DUAL)
SELECT DISTINCT TRIM(CHAINE)
FROM T
MODEL
RETURN UPDATED ROWS
DIMENSION BY (0 POSITION)
MEASURES (CAST( ' ' AS VARCHAR2(50)) AS CHAINE ,txt ,LENGTH(REGEXP_REPLACE(txt,'[^,]+',''))+1 NB_MOT)
RULES
(CHAINE[FOR POSITION FROM 1 TO NVL(NB_MOT[0],1) INCREMENT 1] =
CASE WHEN NB_MOT[0] IS NULL THEN TXT[0] ELSE REGEXP_SUBSTR(txt[0],'[^,]+',1,CV(POSITION)) END );
=========================================================================
Demo
=======================================================================
SQL> WITH t AS
2 (SELECT '0989.726332, 1234.567432, 3453.736379, 3453.736379, 0989.726332, 3453.736379, 123
4.567432, 1234.567432, 0989.726332'
3 txt
4 FROM DUAL)
5 SELECT DISTINCT TRIM(CHAINE)
6 FROM T
7 MODEL
8 RETURN UPDATED ROWS
9 DIMENSION BY (0 POSITION)
10 MEASURES (CAST( ' ' AS VARCHAR2(50)) AS CHAINE ,txt ,LENGTH(REGEXP_REPLACE(txt,'[^,]+',''))+1 NB_MOT)
11 RULES
12 (CHAINE[FOR POSITION FROM 1 TO NVL(NB_MOT[0],1) INCREMENT 1] =
13 CASE WHEN NB_MOT[0] IS NULL THEN TXT[0] ELSE REGEXP_SUBSTR(txt[0],'[^,]+',1,CV(POSITION)) END );
TRIM(CHAINE)
3453.736379
1234.567432
0989.726332
SQL>
========================================================================

How to identify missing records in a single-column table?

How to identify missing records in a single-column table ?
Column consists of numbers in a ordered manner but the some numbers are deleted from the table in random manner and need to identify those rows.

Something like:
WITH t AS (
           SELECT 1 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 2 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 3 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 5 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 8 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 10 ID FROM DUAL UNION ALL
           SELECT 11 ID FROM DUAL
-- end of on-the-fly data sample
SELECT '[' || (id + 1) || ' - ' || (next_id - 1) || ']' gap
FROM (
         SELECT id,
                 lead(id,1,id + 1) over(order by id) next_id
           FROM t
where id != next_id - 1
GAP
[4 - 4]
[6 - 7]
[9 - 9]
SQL> SY.
P.S. I assume sequence lower and upper limits are always present, otherwise query needs a little adjustment.

Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (M8395)

Dear Guru,
I am testing IS-OIL - Exchanges.
Created Exchange Agreement and Purchase Contract and Sales Contract, Purchase Contract and Sales Contract are assigned to the Exchange Contract.
A PO is created with reference to the Purchase Contract.
Upon post goods receipt in MIGO, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGR to get through.
A call-off is created with reference to the Sales Contract.
Similarly, when PGI is performed in VL01N, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IGX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGI to get through.
Checked in OBYC, there is no transaction key for IRX and IGX.
Please advise. Thank you.
Regards,
WL

Hi WL,
In an Exchange scenario, the account determination entry would have to go added through tcode O54E for this purpose. You would see both the IRX and IGX entry in the above mentioned tcode.
Menu path: IS-OIL Downstream --> EXG --> Account Assignment
You would not be able to see the IRX or IGX transaction key in OBYC.
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.
Edited by: Kok Wai Phang on Jul 10, 2011 7:58 AM

Reg.Error in account determination: table T030K key NCCA EXD

Dear Friends
we are doing domestic sales for that I am doing pricing procedure, I create 5 condition types without access sequence,and I manualy enter all the mrp price,mrp discount,bed,eces,shec and cst in billing, during the billing release I am getting the error
" Error in account determination: table T030K key NCCA EXD" Diagnosis In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used. " in VKOA I maintained the account key ERL,MWS and EXD,and also in OBCN and OB40 but I am getting the same error.
do I need to create separate procure for pricing ? or can I use the same procedure which in SD.
do I need to change the TAXINJ and put the EXD there ? I am unable to solve this problem. Please help me .
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

FYI, as per SD pricing for tax condition type is concern, it doesn't require tax procedures to be maintain.
Tax % with correspondingly tax codes are maintain & determine from Condition record in to the pricing of sales doc.
These kind of error occurs due to non determination or missing tax code in sales doc pricing.
In turn, raises error due to accounting interface.
So, as per best practices, tax condition type are determined through condition record in sales document.
Thus, you ought to have access sequence for tax condition type & should create condition record with respective TAX % & Tax code. By, manually processing tax values into pricing, you will be able to maintain tax %, but without TAX CODE.
I hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

FI-SD integration issue Error in account determination: table T030K key NECA EXD Message no. FF709

Dear expert.
Thank you for adding me at your professinal network Linkedin. I am getting some issue related to FI-SD integration.
IT's coming while releasing billing document in Tcode VF02.
Error in account determination: table T030K key XXXX EXD
Message no. FF709
I look into Tcode VKOA- Acct determination for Cust Grp Mat Grp for sales organization for EXD, OB40 - EXD AcctKey, V/08- checked procedure Zneac.
And also maintained the taxcode in Vk11.
But i am not able to understand the issue.
Please reply with valuable suggestion.
Thanks in advance.
Regards Mani.
manibhushanchoubey8 at the rate gmail dot com

Hi
Please check below links
Error in account determination:T030K
Msg no.FF709 Error in account determination: table T030K key INT VS1 I0
Note: Please search in the forum before posting the issue
Thanks
Dasaradha

Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 MW1 Message no. FF709

Dear Gurus
We have activate automatic release to account at VF01 level. For one billing doc system is giving us error
Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 MW1Message no. FF709
At Environment -> Act determination analysis here the system is not giving any error. But accounting entries are not there and Excise accounting entries are generated and showing there.
When we check at header level Header tab Accounting data block Posting status system is showing Error in Accounting Interface.
We have assign MW1 accounting key for CST condition Type.
Assignment in VKOA is also done.
In OB40 tax code and the GL is also done.
Reetesh NIgam

hello, friend.
when you configure account determination, you assign not only account assignment groups (customer, material) to GL accounts, you also need to make assignments for taxes, represented in SAP default by the posting key MWS.
an example assignment in account determination, procedure 5 (General) would be as follow:
Applic/Ty/Chart of Accts/Sales Org/Act Asg Grp/Act Asg Grp/Account key/GL accounts
V   KOFI   INT   1000   01   01   ERL   xxxxxx
V   KOFI   INT   1000   01   01   ERS   xxxxxx
V   KOFI   INT   1000   01   01   ERF   xxxxxx
V   KOFI   INT   1000   01   01   MWS   xxxxxx
please check if your tax condition type/s are included in your pricing procedure and have been defined in FI.
regards.

VF02 - Error in account determination: table T030K key HCL ZAT

Hi,
I am getting following problem, while releasing my billing for accounting (VF02):
"Error in account determination: table T030K key HCL ZAT" Message no. FF709
System is giving this message, However account is already there in table T030K.
Please help.
Regards,
Sandeep

Hi,
I have already checked and entry is there.
Sandeep

Error in account determination: table T030K key CNFX MWS

Hi,
     i have a issue when releasing the billing document .i have a issue like "Error in account determination: table T030K key CNFX
     MWS". Actually iam trying to map the scrap process. User requirement is , when upload the non valuated material Stock, that
     material should be selling to the customer . User's wants to GL account (other revenue) should update the value only .
    i created new material account assignment group. i did GL assignment with combination of customer and material account
    assignment group and sales organisation.
     where i made mistake?
    can you help me for configuration.
WIith regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jul 26, 2011 8:09 AM

Hi,
Maintain account determination for tax in VKOA
Select last combination ACCOUNT KEY
maintain entries for combination of CNFX + Sales orgz.+ MWS = your tax account
Kapil

Error in account determination: table T030K key SCOA JN6 A5

Hi,
While posting the billing dicument Iam getting the error like .Error in account determination: table T030K key SCOA JN6 A5.
(Here SCOA : Chart of Accounts.)
Plz let me know the Answer.
thanking u.

hi,
go to transaction code SE11 and enter the data base table=T030k
and then click on the display button
then go to utilites in the menu bar from there go to table contents go to new entries
and enter
KTOPL= your chart of accounts
KTOSL=jn6
MWSKZ=A5
and save it
hope this will resolve your problem
reward points if the answer is helpful
REgards,
Murali

Liability account column/table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for