Limit number of concurrent connection

is there a way for me to limit the number of concurrent
connections to the media server. my upload bandwitdh is about a meg
so having too many connections just kills the whole thing. i would
like to put a limit at 5 connections. is there a way to do
this?

well i am only using flash media server to displaying videos
and just that. the reason i went with media server vs. progressive
was fullscreen method. since flash doesn't natively support
fullscreen you have to open another browser in fullscreen with
javascript. the problem with that is it start loading from
beginning so i decided to go server that way it only has to buffer
and get to the same point without having to load the whole video up
to that point. Now i want to limit number people that can be
watching the video. if i get more that 5 connection the whole thing
slows down. i am not too familiar with server based connections so
i don't know how to limit the number concurrent connections.

Similar Messages

  • Limit number of concurrent users

    Hi everyone,
    We'd like to limit to 5 the number of concurrent connections to our dashboard, but we cant make it work.
    We've tested changing the Connection Pool, setting to 5 the Maximum connections parameter, but we still can connect with more than 5 users. We've even tried setting the parameter to 1, but still can access the dashboard with more than one user.
    Do we have to set any other parameters? Is this the right way of limiting concurrent connections?
    Btw, we also tried unchecking "Enable connection pool", but it didnt work neither.
    Thanks.
    Regards

    Hi Friend,
    I am Durgaprasad from Pune-INDIA, working as a OBIEE developer, I have one query which I mentioned below can you please go threw it.
    I have done migration Discoverer Admin EUL Layer into OBIEE repository using below methodology.
    Navigate to the <installdrive>\OracleBI\server\Bin directory. There are two important files in this directory: the migration assistant executable file named MigrateEUL.exe and a properties configuration file named MigrationConfig.properties.
    Could you please help me how to migrate discoverer plus workbooks and worksheets into OBIEE Answers?
    go through below link, It will show navigation steps for migrating of EUL from Discoverer to OBIEE.But i need migration of workbooks and worksheets from Discoverer into OBIEE Answers.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe_bi/discoverer/discoverer_1012/discomigration/migrate_disco_biee.htm
    This is very great full help to me …
    Advance thanks for your suggestions.
    Regards
    Duraga Prasad.

  • Maximum number of concurrent connections using java sockets

    How can we find out the maximum number of concurrent connections that can be handled by a pooled connection server?
    I have a pooled server which creates a predefined number of handlers. Upon receiving a new request it accepts the connection and sends it to one of the handler.
    The solution works well for low number of concurrent connections - < 50 or 100
    But as the number increases there seems to be an issue
    1. Ignoring request even if i increase the handlers
    2. Increase in delay. [I feel that the listening thread is not getting the time slice to go read the socket for new requests]
    Any idea as to how i can solve this?
    Would an NIO socket help [am using the conventional java.io Serversocket, because my clients may not be non-blocking]??
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Anp

    There is no set maximum, but it is in the thousands on most platforms. I have a production server that handles tens of thousands of connections simultaneously. Most likely you have a bug in your code.

  • Adobe media server stand and adobe meidia server pro Maximum number of concurrent connections ?

    adobe media server stand and adobe meidia server pro Maximum number of concurrent connections ?

    Petro - you are alive - good news. Can you please contact Matt or I please, we'd be grateful mate - thanks - gavin

  • Limit number of concurrent logins

    Hi, Is there a way to limit the number of concurrent logins in Solaris 10 besides writing a script of some form?
    thanks in advance,
    Ryan

    Oops! I just noticed that in the release notes for 3.6(1) the issues appears as being an open caveat. I am going to upgrade to 3.7 and will post the results.
    Josh

  • How to restrict number of concurrent connections etc.

    Hi,
    I'm able to use wi-fi thru WRT54GC.
    I want to know:
    1. How to restrict number of users connecting to the wireless network that is setup thru my router?
    2. I also want to know about any monitoring software which can tell me about connected PCs, user names, bandwidth available, bandwidth utilized etc.
    Thanks in advance
    Rajeev

    1. logon to router's setup page, open I.E. and in the address bar type 192.168.1.1, it would ask for username and password, put "admin" default password without any username... click on the wireless tab >> wireless security >> try setting up wireless security as per the requirements, also you can setup wireless MAC filter and you can setup MAC address of wireless computers which you want to allow to coonect to the network...
    2. not quiet sure about monitoring software which would show you detail log about bandwidth, bandwidth utilized by each computer...however you should view router's logs from linksys "logviewer" utility...go to ftp.linksys.com/pub/network and download the "logviewer" utility.
    let me know if you have any issues.

  • [Q] Maximum Number of Concurrent Connections to 1142 LAP

    We are having random issues of users not being able to connect to our wireless network consistently. The users will have successfully accessed the network previously but then will have difficulty associating to the network. After a period of time, the association appears successful again. My first thoughts were that there was a restriction on the number of clients that could associate to a given AP at any one time.
    This is the equipment we have:
    1x Cisco Wireless Control Server (WCS) 6.0.181.0
    4x Cisco 5508 Wireless LAN Controllers 6.0.196.0
    60x Aironet 1142N Lightweight Access Points (LAP)
    Is there a hard or recommended maximum number of clients per LAP? If so, where is this defined? From what I have read on these forums, Cisco apparently recommends about 25 clients per AP but I can not find any official documentation to support this.
    When I go to WCS Home > General > Top APs by Client Count, the top AP reports 20 clients. However, if I click on the AP Name and go to the Current Associated Clients tab, it is only listing 8 clients - why is this?
    Any help greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    1.  What error messages do the clients get when they are having association/authentication issues?
    There is no error message on the client, it simply fails to connect instantly. On an Android phone, you see it constantly trying to connect, failing and trying to reconnect. After many attempts (at least 10) it may connect successfully. This appears to me that it may be related to aggressive load balancing - here is what I think may be happening:
    Client tries to connect to nearest LAP
    Nearest LAP has to many clients on associated (as detemrined by the RRM Thresholds > Max Clients setting) and so refuses the connection (and sends a code 17 response)
    Client attempts to connect to the next nearest LAP which is also too busy. It too rejects the connection.
    Client attempts to connect to the third nearest LAP which is also too busy. It too rejects the connection.
    And so on until it comes back to the first nearest LAP
    This LAP, which still has too many associated clients, rejects the connection for a second time (its RRM Thresholds > Min Failed Clients is set to 3)
    the clients tries the other APs and is also rejected as they are all set to reject connections for 3 times.
    Client goes round all the APs for a third time. still getting rejected.
    It then attempts a 4th connection to the nearest LAP and is allowed to associated as it is beyong the 3-attempt threshold for rejected connections.
    This is my understanding of Aggressive Load balancing and would seem to match the observed behaviour of the clients but I would like to know if this is correct and how I can verify that in the logs?
    This goes back to my first question, what is the max recommended number of clients for a 1142N LAP? Furthermore, is there any supporting documentation for this recommendation? Also, if I increase the RRM threshold Max clients to more than its default of 12, will the LAP accept more connections before rejecting them?
    I would also like an answer to my second question in the original post.
    2.  Are you using ACS/RADIUS/TACACS?
    We are using 802.1X with ACS for our corporate users on the corporate SSID but the behaviour described above is seen on guest clients that just use web passthrough (i am not sure if it is also on corporate clients, I have not seen any reports to that effect yet).

  • Is there a way to control the number of concurrent SMTP connections on Database Mail?

    Las week Rackspace started controlling the number of concurrent SMTP connections and we are now getting the following message when we send as little as 15 messages at a time using Database Mail:
    Exception Message: Cannot send mails to mail server. (Service not available, closing transmission channel. The server response was: 4.7.0 smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com Error: too many connections from IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
    We are using SQL Server 2005 and Windows 2003 and we have been doing this since 2006 with no problems
    Is there a way to control the number of concurrent SMTP connections used by Database Mail or the Database Mail external executable DatabaseMail90.exe?

    Hi rkohler,
    Usually, we can use the Database Mail Configuration Wizard or the Database Mail stored procedures to determine the server name and port number for the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) server . In the SMTP server points, we can set or increase the number
    of concurrent connections.
    There is similar issue about database email on SQL Server 2005, you can refer to the following post.
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/6bb7b600-f025-451b-898b-2caa29c10d4d/only-some-email-gets-sent-successfully-from-spsenddbmail-database-mail-on-sql-server-2005
    Thanks,
    Sofiya Li
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click here.
    Sofiya Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Max concurrent connections

    Coming back to a topic that was posted a few months ago with
    an
    additional question:
    >I believe you mean to ask, "What is the maximum number of
    >concurrent connections such as those used in loadMovie or
    XML.load?"
    >If this is what you're asking then there are no current
    limits. However,
    >the sending server may limit concurrent connections for a
    single client
    >to any number so the loads may fail if they exceed this
    limit. The
    >limitations are therefore server-based, not Flash based,
    and they will
    >differ from server to server.
    My question:
    While Flash doesn't enforce a limit, do any/all browsers
    enforce
    limits? If I wanted to load up 50, 100, 200 movies at once,
    where if
    anywhere would I be limited?
    Also, it seems that, in a test program loading a bunch of
    images from a server concurrently, I am not able to get more than
    two at once. Is this purely a server issue?
    -andy

    Hi,
    I imagine it does.
    Also I guess if we are talking about just some random UDP traffic it would also mean that the default timeout for a connection would be 2min. The most usual UDP traffic would probably be DNS querys. In those cases I presume though that the UDP connections dont stay on firewall for long as long as the firewall sees the DNS reply.
    But as I said if we are talking about some random UDP traffic that is allowed through the firewall I would guess it stays in the connection table of the firewall for a couple of minutes. So you might be looking at 1000 concurrent connections or even more?
    I have once witnessed a single server sending so much UDP traffic that it reached the connection limit of an ASA5540 which is 400 000 concurrent connections.
    - Jouni

  • What no of concurrent connections can each server serv?

    Ok we're a startup and currently thinking about whether to use flash media streaming server or red5, or progressive streaming with lighttpd.
    In order to make a decision I would like to know how many concurrent streams can flash media server server stream until one has to purchase another license. Do any of you guys have some numbers.
    We will be streaming mp3 at low bit rates, service will be hosted within AWS EC2 (with whatever instances are available there). So if you can post some performance specs that would be great....
    Oddly enough Adobe Sales does not even know the answer... I have heard rumors that high number of concurrent connections is not a really a feature that this product is developed towards.
    Thanks for you answers.

    I'd do some more research before commiting to EC2/S3 at all. I'd also confirm that comment about Wowza streaming from S3... I've never worked with it, but if you're streaming, chances are S3 is just storage, and you're actually streaming from EC2 (I don't think you can run an application on S3... but maybe I'm wrong there)
    The trouble is, regardless of the software, you're still in competition for bandwidth. There's only so much capacity at the network interface of each shared server, and if you happen to land on a busy server, you may find there isn't enough to go around. For stateless applications like HTTP request/response, that's fine, but for apps that require statefull client/server connections, bandwidth and latency issues can prove catastrophic.
    The biggest problem I have with running a streaming server on EC2 (virtualization issues aside), is that they won't disclose hardware or network specs. So, while you can be sure you'll have the memory and processor allocation, it's a crapshoot when it comes to disk time and bandwidth, as you have no real idea how many other instances you're sharing a server with, or what those other instances are doing in terms of bandwidth and disk usage.
    While I don't know any of the specs on the cloudfront service, I suspect those servers are load balanced in such a way that bandwidth is accounted for. In the general population EC2 servers, that's not the case.
    My advice... really research this before you make your deployment decisions. I've come to find that while scaling out is a bit more challenging, dedicated hardware and bandwidth isn't all that much more expensive than EC2, and when you go dedicated, you can actually count on your resources being available to you.

  • How do I change concurrently connected users?

    One of the first questions dbassist asks for a custom, hybrid database (others too?) is the number of concurrently connected users.
    Question: How is that number used?
    Question: How do I change that number?
    Thanks,
    Jerry

    I don't think that the information is used directly. I suspect it's used to calculate a reasonable size for the SGA, etc.
    This means that you can't directly change it, but by tweaking the settings in init.ora you can get the same effect.

  • How do you set maximum number of concurrent users to OBIEE

    In a training session for the end users - only 4 users could connect - after this others could not connect - got NQS Error:100118 Access for the connection is refused

    As I don't see any configuration tag to specify concurrent users.
    Try this, go to connection pool (within RPD) and set the maximum number of connections, this does correspond to number of concurrent connections to database but not concurrent users.
    mark posts promptly.
    -bifacts
    http://www.obinotes.com
    J
    Edited by: bifacts on Dec 21, 2010 12:14 PM

  • How to limit the number of TCP connections beeing used concurrently while a page is beeing loaded?

    We manufacture industrial small-footprint control modules with embedded web server. The resources of these modules are very limited, especially in RAM. We have problem, that FF opens 15 parallel TCP connections while loading a web page (main html page first, then all icons simultaneously). We can not handle such behavior because of lack of RAM memory needed for TCP buffers.
    Question is how to limit the number of concurrent TCP connections the browser will use? We need to do it somehow directly from the page, we can not push our customers to change the general settings of their browsers (they would not understand such things anyway).
    Do anyone have any suggestion?

    Sorry, one other thought. Many web designers now combine all icons into a single image and use CSS to clip the image so that only the desired portion is displayed. This minimizes the number of required connections and increases the probability that the image can be retrieved from cache.
    More info:
    * [http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_image_sprites.asp CSS Image Sprites - W3Schools]
    * [http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites/ A List Apart: Articles: CSS Sprites: Image Slicing’s Kiss of Death]
    * [http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/27/the-mystery-of-css-sprites-techniques-tools-and-tutorials/ The Mystery Of CSS Sprites: Techniques, Tools And Tutorials | Smashing Coding]
    No idea whether this is practical for your application.

  • Maximum number of concurrent users that can connect to a SQL DB

    I see various SQL DB plan S0, S1, S2 and P1, P2 and P3.  Each one of them talk about DTU's but never talk about the max number of concurrent users.  Where can I find that number and is it configurable by the end user?

    It is the maximum connection that is most important. Best practice is not to have users holding on to their connection for long period of time. Maximum user connection in SQL is 32767, resource permitting. Not sure for Azure SQL. If you follow best
    practice, you are not supposed to hit this limit cause other limits will be hit first.
    Frank

  • Maximum number of concurrent WCF connections on Windows 7

    I have a WCF service hosted on Windows 7 Pro operating system.
    I would like to know if there is some OS restriction for the number of concurrent WCF clients from different IP addresses that interacts with my service. My WCF service could be run under a dedicated console process or under a Windows Service.
    I know that there is a 20 limit of concurrent inbound connections to the MS services (like IIS, File Service, Print Services, etc.), but I have my own custom service that I want to use. 
    If there is some OS restrictions related to my case, which are the restrictions when using Windows Server OS?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    There is no any restriction about the Windows Operating System. The configuration of
    maxConcurrentCalls, maxConcurrentSessions, and
    maxConcurrentInstances only depends on your CPU cores.
    Set maxConcurrentCalls, maxConcurrentSessions, and
    maxConcurrentInstances to a value greater than 16 * the number of CPUs or CPU cores. For example, on a computer with 8 CPU cores, set
    maxConcurrentCalls, maxConcurrentSessions, and
    maxConcurrentInstances to a value greater than 128 (16 * 8 = 128) as follows:
    <serviceThrottling
    maxConcurrentCalls="200"
    maxConcurrentSessions="200"
    maxConcurrentInstances="200" />
    For more detailed information, please read these articles:
    WCF configuration default limits, concurrency and scalability
    http://weblogs.asp.net/paolopia/wcf-configuration-default-limits-concurrency-and-scalability
    Optimizing WCF Web Service Performance
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee377061(v=bts.70).aspx
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for