Limit on number of statements exceeded

Hi Experts,
He have done SAP Data archiving in a test server. The current ASP used is 88%. After delete job in DB12 it is showing 148 GB space. Now I want to reorganized the Table (COEP). But it is showing an error Limit on number of statements exceeded after sometime. How to resolve it?
Asad

Hi Asad,
how large is COEP ?
How many rows do your have in COEP ?
How many rows are deleted in COEP ?
How large is your ASP
The ASP usage is 88%, isn't it ?
You should keep in mind, that COEP gets copied with the new size temporary twice ...
Therefore, it might become an issue ...
I do hope, that you do have more tables with deleted rows .... then you might want to start the smaller ones first in order to get more free ...
I suggest, that you install the CONTOOL with investigation for this in order to get a good overview on youur DASD usage ... you can download it for free at:
consolut - Monitoring and administration on iSeries
Regards,
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag

Similar Messages

  • Limit to number of states in an MSO?

    I am working on a project that will include an extensive alphabetical index. I'm setting this up with a page for each letter with an mso with about 50 states (on each page) and a scrolling frame with about 50 buttons that control the states. I named the buttons to correspond with the names of the states and gave the buttons their actions after pasting them into the scrolling frame. I did this by selecting them in the layers palette. I checked my work and the buttons are pointing to the right states. The scrolling frame works but the buttons don't. What am I doign wrong? Thanks!

    Just encountered a DPS article which we're planning to be the main navigation of the folio and, in order to create the interactivity, it looks like the correct way to have it work is an MSO with a large number of states.
    We've started with one MSO with five states, and tried to have buttons within each state load a state in another MSO which would contain buttons to nav to the article in question - which isn't going to work.
    So we could have a state in the main MSO with buttons that go to anothe state within the main MSO with a button that describes the link and takes you to the article in question.
    The problem will be that if the original five states had say 10 buttons then we're up for 55 states in the resultant MSO - Are you with me so far?
    The elements with the MSO will only be text boxes, but they'll be rasterised so will this cause problems in performance on iPad 1 viewers? Does anyone have a good general rule of thumb for the number of states which is going to start causing problems?
    I know it's a bit of an open-ended question, but it's a fair chunk of work to create the MSO with buttons only to find it doesn't work.
    Thanks in advance,
    Simon.

  • How can I limit the number of rows returned by a select stat

    How can I limit the number of rows returned by a select
    statement. I have a query where I return the number of stores
    that are located in a given area.. I only want to return the
    first twenty-five stores. In some instances there may be over
    200 stores in a given location.
    I know is SQL 7 that I can set the pagesize to be 25....
    Anything similiar in Oracle 8i?
    null

    Debbie (guest) wrote:
    : Chad Nale (guest) wrote:
    : : How can I limit the number of rows returned by a select
    : : statement. I have a query where I return the number of
    : stores
    : : that are located in a given area.. I only want to return the
    : : first twenty-five stores. In some instances there may be
    : over
    : : 200 stores in a given location.
    : : I know is SQL 7 that I can set the pagesize to be 25....
    : : Anything similiar in Oracle 8i?
    : If you are in Sql*Plus, you could add the statement
    : WHERE rownum <= 25
    : Used together with an appropriate ORDER BY you
    : could get the first 25 stores.
    Watch out. ROWNUM is run before ORDER BY so this would only
    order the 25 selected
    null

  • Number of processes exceeds maximum limit

    Normally how many process we need to put in init.ora.
    My database currently has processes=100 so Obviously sessions=(100 X 1.1)+5=115.
    Some times we use to get Number of processes exceeds more than 100.
    What does it mean. What is the preferable value for processes.
    I have a thought to put Processes=300.
    Regards,
    Ganesh.

    Dear Ganesh,
    When you are getting the "Processes exceeded" error, your Oracle server is letting you know that the number of operating system processes has exceeded 100.
    Go ahead and set:
    processes = 250
    in your INIT.ORA file. You have to then shutdown and restart the database for the changes to take effect.
    Ciao.
    null

  • How to limit the number of rows in a report

    I have several reports with a number of parameters - date ranges etc.
    Depending on the parameter values selected by the user the reports can return thousands of rows.
    I would like to limit the number of rows returned to, say, 500. If more than 500 rows are returned by the query then display an error message requesting that the user enter more specific parameters.
    Ideally for performance reasons it would be good to catch the error before the datafile is generated, but I don't know if this is possible. Alternatively a check in the template might do the job - using COUNT on the group?.

    Hi Hugh,
    In your query, you got to add rowum < 500 or some sort of DB specific limit to the row being returned,
    this will help to stop the report to get more than 500 records and the report template wont have any restriction.
    or
    you can do that in template too, but i would not recommend.
    In these both cases or in any case, you cannot give any meaningful error if it exceeds N rows,there is no option like this till now.

  • How do I limit the number of rows retrieved at a time using RefCursor?

    I have a PL/SQL package in use, that returns a REF CURSOR. This is currently being used in a Forms 6i application. Now I want to develop an ASP.NET web application that displays exactly the same information as my Forms 6i module. In fact those two applications will be used concurrently for a while.
    I looked at the sample code provided on otn.oracle.com and decided to use the OracleDataAdapter.Fill()-method to fill a dataset and bind that dataset to a pageable GridView. Now I wonder, whether this method retrieves ALL records of the query at once and how I can limit the number of rows fetched? The Select statement retrieves up to 10000 rows at a time. Most of the time, a user is only interested in the first 20-30 rows. Forms 6i fetches more rows as the user scrolls down, how can I implement the same behavior in ODP.NET?
    - Markus

    Excuse me, but the reply does not quite answer my question. Maybe I did not explain my concerns clear enough:
    I understand the use of the two properties (RowSize and FetchSize) to reduce the amount of round trips needed to transfer the data - not the number of rows fetched in total. This would still lead to a situation where all rows are transferred, when I am using the OracleDataAdapter.Fill()-Method. Is this correct or did I misunderstand the function of this method?
    I quote the otherwise really helpful article you send me:
    Of course, there is a cost if the fetch size is arbitrarily large. More client-side memory and processor cycles will be needed to store and manage a larger amount of data. The goal is to find a high-performing balance between the number of round trips and the amount of data retrieved per trip.
    My RowSize is for sure a bit larger than the one in the given example. The query will probably be used by up to 100 users at a time, so I would like to limit the resource-costs not only on the network by the number of round trips, but also on the web-server which is storing all these records in it's memory per user-request.

  • How to limit the number of items that a list control can hold?

    Hi,
    I am using a Flex3 List control for one of my projects.
    I add drag & drop functionality to it, so that i can drag & drop elements from one control to another.
    How to limit the number of items that a list control can hold / can be dropped in a list control ?
    - Sen.

    1. Listen for the dragdrop event on the control you are dragging onto.
    2. check the length of the items in the dataprovider - if it exceeds your maximum override the default drop action with e.preventDefault(); (assuming you used e for the event on the handler).
    Regards,
    Mark.

  • ABAP Query - Want to limit the number of records to 5

    I have a query based on a a table join (MKPF with MSEG) infoset. I want to limit the number of records to first five.
    How to deal with it?

    select data from tables using join and where conditions....into internal table....
    now move the first 5 records to second internal table and use them...
    or else in ur select statement u can use...
    select  data from tables <join condition> upto 5 rows.
    Message was edited by:
            Ramesh Babu Chirumamilla

  • Limit to Number of Connections in an AIR Application?

    Is there a limit to the number of simultaneous connections in an AIR application?  I use URLLoader to make connections to a server.  If more than 2 connections are opened the rest get "Error #2032: Stream Error.".  Where is the limit and how do I change it?

    Just encountered a DPS article which we're planning to be the main navigation of the folio and, in order to create the interactivity, it looks like the correct way to have it work is an MSO with a large number of states.
    We've started with one MSO with five states, and tried to have buttons within each state load a state in another MSO which would contain buttons to nav to the article in question - which isn't going to work.
    So we could have a state in the main MSO with buttons that go to anothe state within the main MSO with a button that describes the link and takes you to the article in question.
    The problem will be that if the original five states had say 10 buttons then we're up for 55 states in the resultant MSO - Are you with me so far?
    The elements with the MSO will only be text boxes, but they'll be rasterised so will this cause problems in performance on iPad 1 viewers? Does anyone have a good general rule of thumb for the number of states which is going to start causing problems?
    I know it's a bit of an open-ended question, but it's a fair chunk of work to create the MSO with buttons only to find it doesn't work.
    Thanks in advance,
    Simon.

  • Can I limit the number of rows returned on a Select?

    Can I limit the number of rows returned on a Select statement? I would be using JDBC in a Java program.

    Use Java prepared statements with the equivalent of this SQL*plus script:
    VARIABLE n number
    EXEC :n := 3;
    SELECT rownum FROM all_objects WHERE rownum <= :n;
        ROWNUM
             1
             2
             3
    EXEC :n := 5;
    SELECT rownum FROM all_objects WHERE rownum <= :n;
        ROWNUM
             1
             2
             3
             4
             5

  • Limit rows in select statement

    Hi,
    we have the following SQL select statement in an extension in our CMS system
    var newConn = new openConnection();
    if(request.searchBox)
         var searchBox = request.searchBox;
         var keywords = searchBox.split(' ')
         var sql = 'SELECT forumID, masterID, subject, message, datePosted FROM THREADS WHERE approved=1'
         for(var i=0; i<keywords.length; i++)
              sql += ' AND UPPER(subject) LIKE UPPER(\'%' + keywords[i] + '%\')'
              sql += ' OR UPPER(message) LIKE UPPER(\'%' + keywords[i] + '%\')'
         sql          += ' ORDER BY datePosted DESC;';
    else {
         document.write("No results found");
    var result = newConn.execute(sql);
    var counter = 0;
    while(result && (counter < 5 || request.searchBox))
         ascii_nextCol(result[0]);                                             //Datafield 0 Forum ID
         ascii_nextCol(result[1]);                                             //Datafield 1 Master ID
         ascii_nextCol(result[2]);                                             //Datafield 2 Subject
         ascii_nextCol(result[3]);                                             //Datafield 3 Message
         ascii_nextCol(dateFormatter.format(result[4]));                    //Datafield 4 Date posted     
         ascii_nextRow();
         result = newConn.nextRow();
         counter++;
    closeConnection(newConn);
    ascii_update();
    There are a couple of issues with it though, this bit doesn't work when no results are returned:
    else {
         document.write("No results found");
    And I want to limit the number of rows to 50.
    Someone mentioned that "ROWCOUNT" could be the answer to both problems but I have no idea where it should go or how to write it into this code. I've tried Googling for an answer without much luck as I don't know a great deal about this coding.
    Can anyone help?

    Aga wrote:
    Try adding
    sql += ' AND rownum < 51'
    before
    sql += ' ORDER BY datePosted DESC;';
    It will limit the number of rows to 50.If you limit by rownum and order in the same query you are ordering 50 random rows of the query.
    you should order in a subquery before using rownum to get only the top results.
    Processing ...
    with t as (
         select 120 as val from dual
         union all
         select -5 as val from dual
         union all
         select 45 as val from dual
         union all
         select 3 as val from dual
         union all
         select 1258 as val from dual
         union all
         select 874552 as val from dual
         union all
         select -1452 as val from dual
         union all
         select 0 as val from dual
    select *
    from t
    where rownum <= 3
    order by val
    Query finished, retrieving results...
                      VAL                 
                                        -5
                                        45
                                       120
    3 row(s) retrieved
    Processing ...
    with t as (
         select 120 as val from dual
         union all
         select -5 as val from dual
         union all
         select 45 as val from dual
         union all
         select 3 as val from dual
         union all
         select 1258 as val from dual
         union all
         select 874552 as val from dual
         union all
         select -1452 as val from dual
         union all
         select 0 as val from dual
    select *
    from (
              select *
              from t
              order by val
    where rownum <= 3
    Query finished, retrieving results...
                      VAL                 
                                     -1452
                                        -5
                                         0
    3 row(s) retrievedBye Alessandro

  • How to limit the number of search results returned by oracle text

    Hello All,
    I am running an oracle text search which returned the following error to my java program.
    ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
    DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
    #### ORA-29902: Fehler bei der Ausführung von Routine ODCIIndexStart()
    ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
    DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
    java.sql.SQLException: ORA-29902: Fehler bei der Ausführung von Routine ODCIIndexStart()
    ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
    DRG-51030: wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms
    at oracle.jdbc.dbaccess.DBError.throwSqlException(DBError.java:169)
    When i looked up the net, one suggestion that was given is to narrow the wildcard query, which i cannot in my search page. Hence I am left with the only alternative of limiting the number of results returned by oracle text search query.
    Please let me know how to limit the number of search results returned by oracle text so that this error can be avoided.
    Thanks in advance
    krk

    Hi,
    If not set explicitly, the default value for WILDCARD_MAXTERMS is 5000. This is set as a wordlist preference. This means that if your wildcard query matches more than 5000 terms the message is returned. Exceeding that would give the user a lot to sift through.
    My suggestion: trap the error and return a meaningful message to the user indicating that the search needs to be refined. Although it is possible to increase the number of terms before hitting maxterms (increase wildcard_maxterms preference value for your wordlist), 5000 records is generally too much for a user to deal with anyway. The search is not a good one since it is not restricting rows adequately. If it happens frequently, get the query log and see the terms that are being searched that generate this message. It may be necessary to add one or more words to a stoplist if they are too generic.
    Example: The word mortgage might be a great search term for a local business directory. It might be a terrible search term for a national directory of mortgage lenders though (since 99% of them have the term in their name). In the case of the national directory, that term would be a candidate for inclusion in the stoplist.
    Also remember that full terms do not need a wildcard. Search for "car %" is not necessary and will give you the error you mentioned. A search for "car" will yield the results you need even if it is only part of a bigger sentence because everything is based on the token. You may already know all of this, but without an example query I figured I'd mention it to be sure.
    As for limiting the results - the best way to do that is to allow the user to limit the results through their query. This will ensure accurate and more meaningful results for them.
    -Ron

  • How to limit the number of seleted records?

    Hi,
    I have a performance issue in the context of SQL .
    I used JDBC to excute a select statement. The number of found records might be too large (e.g. 10000). To display them, I set a marge (e.g. 50 ) It is fine for display purpose.
    However, the execution of select statement took long time although I only needed 50 of them.
    Is it possible to make the execution of SQL select statement only work until it found 50 records?
    it seems that i dreamed. But maybe there is a walk around.
    Regards,
    PY

    You could also try calling the Statement (or
    PreparedStatement etc.)'s setMaxRows() method.when using Oracle, does it use the "ROWNUM < maxRows" to limit the number of entries or does it actually retrieve all the data from the database and only then limit the result to the requested amount?
    THX

  • Need to know how to limit the number of rows returned on Oracle

    MS SQL Server has a command called 'set row count'.
    We are trying to find similar one on Oracle.
    What we are trying to do is that instead of using rownum in the query statement, we would like to find way to limit the number of rows returned. I understand that we can use JDBC resultSet object, but that's not what we want.
    I know Oracle has one called arraysize, but this would not limit the number of rows returned either.
    Pease help.
    Thanks

    I understand that we can use JDBC resultSet object, but that's not what we want.I'm not sure which feature of ResultSet you use and which not.
    But if this question has anything to do with JDBC (that's the forum where you put it), I'd recommend to use Statement.setMaxRows(). This will limit the count of rows which your statement will fetch into it's ResultSet.

  • Max. number of expressions exceeded

    I have a simple SQL to select data from a single table with a
    list of 1000 elements i.e. SELECT A FROM TABLE_A WHERE B IN (1,
    2, 3, ..., 1000). It worked fine. If I added one more i.e.
    WHERE B IN (1, 2, 3, ...., 1000, 1001), then I got error 1795 -
    Max number of expressions exceeded 254. I thought this error
    applies to the number of expressions. What I have was a list of
    values in a single expression -> B IN (1, 2, ...).
    I think the error message is misleading. If there is a limit of
    1000 elements in the IN expression, the error message should say
    so unlesss Oracle somehow formats the 1000 elements into 254
    expressions behind the scene.
    Any comments.
    Thanks.
    null

    What versions are you using?
    Do you have a License?
    thanks
    mike

Maybe you are looking for