Linking tables......!!!!!!!!!

Hi,
I am working with MM module.
As for the functionality, I want to get the condition value for all purchase document items.
Then How to link purchase document items with condition items.
Urgent.
Points assured.
Cheers

Hi,
Fetch KNUMH from EKKO.
Pass this KNUMH to KONV and to be item specific pass EKPO-EBELP to KONV-KPOSN.
Thanks and regards,
S. Chandra Mouli.

Similar Messages

How to Bind a Combo Box so that it retrieves and display content corresponding to the Id in a link table and populates itself with the data in the main table?

I am developing a desktop application in Wpf using MVVM and Entity Frameworks. I have the following tables:
1. Party (PartyId, Name)
2. Case (CaseId, CaseNo)
3. Petitioner (CaseId, PartyId) ............. Link Table
I am completely new to .Net and to begin with I download Microsoft's sample application and
following the pattern I have been successful in creating several tabs. The problem started only when I wanted to implement many-to-many relationship. The sample application has not covered the scenario where there can be a any-to-many relationship. However
with the help of MSDN forum I came to know about a link table and managed to solve entity framework issues pertaining to many-to-many relationship. Here is the screenshot of my application to show you what I have achieved so far.
And now the problem I want the forum to address is how to bind a combo box so that it retrieves Party.Name for the corresponding PartyId in the Link Table and also I want to populate it with Party.Name so that
users can choose one from the dropdown list to add or edit the petitioner.

Hello Barry,
Thanks a lot for responding to my query. As I am completely new to .Net and following the pattern of Microsoft's Employee Tracker sample it seems difficult to clearly understand the concept and implement it in a scenario which is different than what is in
the sample available at the link you supplied.
To get the idea of the thing here is my code behind of a view vBoxPetitioner:
<UserControl x:Class="CCIS.View.Case.vBoxPetitioner"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:v="clr-namespace:CCIS.View.Case"
xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:CCIS.ViewModel.Case"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignWidth="300"
d:DesignHeight="200">
<UserControl.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:vmPetitioner}">
<v:vPetitioner Margin="0,2,0,0" />
</DataTemplate>
</UserControl.Resources>
<Grid>
<HeaderedContentControl>
<HeaderedContentControl.Header>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" HorizontalAlignment="Right">
<TextBlock Margin="2">
<Hyperlink Command="{Binding Path=AddPetitionerCommand}">Add Petitioner</Hyperlink>
| <Hyperlink Command="{Binding Path=DeletePetitionerCommand}">Delete</Hyperlink>
</TextBlock>
</StackPanel>
</HeaderedContentControl.Header>
<ListBox BorderThickness="0" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=CurrentPetitioner, Mode=TwoWay}" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=tblParties}" />
</HeaderedContentControl>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
This part is working fine as it loads another view that is vPetioner perfectly in the manner I want it to be.
Here is the code of vmPetitioner, a ViewModel:
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System.Collections.ObjectModel
Imports System
Imports CCIS.Model.Party
Namespace CCIS.ViewModel.Case
''' <summary>
''' ViewModel of an individual Email
''' </summary>
Public Class vmPetitioner
Inherits vmParty
''' <summary>
''' The Email object backing this ViewModel
''' </summary>
Private petitioner As tblParty
''' <summary>
''' Initializes a new instance of the EmailViewModel class.
''' </summary>
''' <param name="detail">The underlying Email this ViewModel is to be based on</param>
Public Sub New(ByVal detail As tblParty)
If detail Is Nothing Then
Throw New ArgumentNullException("detail")
End If
Me.petitioner = detail
End Sub
''' <summary>
''' Gets the underlying Email this ViewModel is based on
''' </summary>
Public Overrides ReadOnly Property Model() As tblParty
Get
Return Me.petitioner
End Get
End Property
''' <summary>
''' Gets or sets the actual email address
''' </summary>
Public Property fldPartyId() As String
Get
Return Me.petitioner.fldPartyId
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
Me.petitioner.fldPartyId = value
Me.OnPropertyChanged("fldPartyId")
End Set
End Property
End Class
End Namespace
And below is the ViewMode vmParty which vmPetitioner Inherits:
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System
Imports System.Collections.Generic
Imports CCIS.Model.Case
Imports CCIS.Model.Party
Imports CCIS.ViewModel.Helpers
Namespace CCIS.ViewModel.Case
''' <summary>
''' Common functionality for ViewModels of an individual ContactDetail
''' </summary>
Public MustInherit Class vmParty
Inherits ViewModelBase
''' <summary>
''' Gets the underlying ContactDetail this ViewModel is based on
''' </summary>
Public MustOverride ReadOnly Property Model() As tblParty
'''' <summary>
'''' Gets the underlying ContactDetail this ViewModel is based on
'''' </summary>
'Public MustOverride ReadOnly Property Model() As tblAdvocate
''' <summary>
''' Gets or sets the name of this department
''' </summary>
Public Property fldName() As String
Get
Return Me.Model.fldName
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
Me.Model.fldName = value
Me.OnPropertyChanged("fldName")
End Set
End Property
''' <summary>
''' Constructs a view model to represent the supplied ContactDetail
''' </summary>
''' <param name="detail">The detail to build a ViewModel for</param>
''' <returns>The constructed ViewModel, null if one can't be built</returns>
Public Shared Function BuildViewModel(ByVal detail As tblParty) As vmParty
If detail Is Nothing Then
Throw New ArgumentNullException("detail")
End If
Dim e As tblParty = TryCast(detail, tblParty)
If e IsNot Nothing Then
Return New vmPetitioner(e)
End If
Return Nothing
End Function
End Class
End Namespace
And final the code behind of the view vPetitioner:
<UserControl x:Class="CCIS.View.Case.vPetitioner"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:CCIS.ViewModel.Case"
mc:Ignorable="d"
Width="300">
<UserControl.Resources>
<ResourceDictionary Source=".\CompactFormStyles.xaml" />
</UserControl.Resources>
<Grid>
<Border Style="{StaticResource DetailBorder}">
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<TextBlock Grid.Column="0" Text="Petitioner:" />
<ComboBox Grid.Column="1" Width="240" SelectedValuePath="." SelectedItem="{Binding Path=tblParty}" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=PetitionerLookup}" DisplayMemberPath="fldName" />
</Grid>
</Border>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
The problem, presumably, seems to be is that the binding path "PetitionerLookup" of the ItemSource of the Combo box in the view vPetitioner exists in a different ViewModel vmCase which serves as an ObservableCollection for MainViewModel. Therefore,
what I need to Know is how to route the binding path if it exists in a different ViewModel?
Sir, I look forward to your early reply bringing a workable solution to the problem I face.
Warm Regards,
Arun

Crystal report XI error while Linking tables

We have just purchased Crystal Report XI license copy but as we going to create new report there is problem in linking tables
i.e while pressing LINK tab after selecting ODBC databse name application going shut down.Please suggest.Thanks in advance

I would make verify the database within Crystal report and then re publish it again. It seems it doesn't get the connection to the db.
Have you refreshed the database within Crystal Reports?
As Graham said, does it open in Crystal Viewer?
another thing would be to add the DSN (System DSN) onto your client machine as well. Maybe it is not getting a right connection.
Try it and let us know.
Kind Regards
Jehanzeb

View for a network node or link table

Can a view be used for a nework node or link table? The process sdo_net.validate_network hangs when I try to validate a network based on views for the node and link tables.

I am using a logical model. The sql statement (checking link/node relationship) that hangs is:
select count(a.link_id) from vlinks a
where not exists
select * from vnodes b
where b.node_id = a.start_node_id or b.node_id = a.end_node_id
I gather there is a concurrency issue with my links view because it joins a table with itself. I have a link table that has the start and end nodes defined on two records. Here is my view script:
create or replace view vlinks
(link_id, link_name, start_node_id, end_node_id, link_type, active, link_level, cost, parent_link_id)
as
select a.id, 'Link '||a.id, a.nodeid, b.nodeid, 'simple', 'Y',1,0,''
from vnodes a, vnodes b
where a.seq=1 and b.seq>1 and a.id = b.id
I can create tables from my views and validate them successfully through sdo_net.validate_nodes_schema, sdo_net.validate_links_schema, and sdo_net.validate_network.
I can analyze the network model through the Java API using the reachable nodes, shortest path, and spanning tree methods without any problems.
I guess I'll validate my view links by counting the total number of links and subtracting the number of links joined successfully at the start and end nodes - if 0 then all links are valid. E.g.:
select count(link_id) from
select link_id from vlinks
minus
select a.link_id from vlinks a, vnodes b, vnodes c
where a.start_node_id = b.node_id
and a.end_node_id = c.node_id

Linking Tables to Oracle Views

I am not able to see the PKs in MS-ACCESS after creating a linked table to a view within Oracle. The views were created using Select * from the base table which is a materialized view. No WHERE clause in the view.
Also, why do I get an error when creating a linked table to a materialized view in Oracle. I am getting the following error when creating the linked table:
"Invalid filed definition M_ROW$$ in definition of index or relationship.
Thanks,
Todd Schaberg
[email protected]

This is a known problem. We're trying to work with the materialized views folks to get this resolved.
As a workaround, you can create a view of the materialized view and link to that.
Justin Cave
ODBC Development

How to see the linked table in oracle 8.0

hi,
i am using oracle 8.0, i have some 8 to 9 tables in it, some of them are linked, is there any way i could see the linked tables, if you do know any utility pls let me know.
regards
user456932

i am using oracle 8.0, i have some 8 to 9 tables in
it, some of them are linked, is there any way i could
see the linked tablesI understand from your question that you are refering to Referential Integrity. I.e you have Parent Tables with Primary Keys and Child Tables linked with Foreign Keys.
It is easier to use GUI tools (OEM, Toad etc) to browse through them. In Toad for instance as a start, you can view the SQL Model. There are other Modelling tools you can use as well.
For the start, you can check USER_CONSTRAINTS and other related dictionary views to find them.
Here is a small example:
select      constraint_name
     ,constraint_type
     ,table_name
     ,r_constraint_name
     ,delete_rule
     ,status
from user_constraints;
The constraint_type will show P (Primary Key), C (Check), R (Referential) etc
However, you can use queries to find Object Dependencies in the Database.
Read more from the SQL Reference Manual to get more knowledge in this area.

Simple Query in Oracle Linked Table in MS Access causes full table scan.

I am running a very simple query in MS ACCESS to a linked Oracle table as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > MyDate()
or
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > [Forms]![MyForm]![Date1]
We have over 50 machines and this query runs fine on over half of these, using an Oracle Index on the "performed" field. Running exactly the same thing on the other machines causes a full table scan, therefore ignoring the Index (all machines access the same Access DB).
Strangely, if we write the query as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS
Where performed > #09/04/2009 08:00#
it works fast everywhere!
Any help on this 'phenominon' would be appreciated.
Things we've done:
Checked regional settings, ODBC driver settings, MS Access settings (as in Tools->Options), we have the latest XP and Office service packs, and re-linked all Access Tables on both the slow and fast machines independantly).

Primarily, thanks gdarling for your reply. This solved our problem.
Just a small note to those who may be using this thread.
Although this might not be the reason, my PC had Oracle 9iR2 installed with Administratiev Tools, where user machines had the same thing installed but using Runtime Installation. For some reason, my PC did not have 'bind date' etc. as an option in the workarounds, but user machines did have this workaround option. Strangely, although I did not have the option, my (ODBC) query was running as expected, but user queries were not.
When we set the workaround checkbox accordingly, the queries then run as expected (fast).
Once again,
Thanks

Defining Dimensions, Attribute Hierarchies for a Link Table(Many to Many)

I have 3 Tables in the Database
Table 1: Transactions (Fact Table) - PK(TransactionId)
Table 2: Relationship (Dimension1) - PK(Relationship Id), FK_TransactionId, FK_CompanyId, RelationshipType
Table 3: Companies (Dimension 2) - PK(CompanyId)
Table 2: Relationship table is a link table between Transactions & Companies to facilitate many to many relationship.
I defined Fact and Dimension tables accordingly but having issues defining Dimension & Attributes for Relationship tables
Relationship Dimension:
I have 3 hierarchy groups defined
Hierarchy 1 - Relation -Relationship Type,Relationship Id(PK)
Hierarchy 2 - Transaction - Transaction, Relationship Id(PK)
Hiearchy 3 - Company - CompanyId, Relationship Id(PK)
Defined the attribute relationship in the following way
RelationshipID(PK) ---> CompanyId , RelationshipID(PK) ---> TransactionId, RelationshipID(PK)
---> RelationshipTYpe
I am getting incorrect results when I deploy the cube. Not all the types are being displayed only 4 types are being displayed out of 27 types though there exists Transactions for all the Types.
To fix the incorrect results, I tried to break the Relationship Dimension into 2 dimensions seperating Transaction(Relationship Dim) & Company,Type (Companies Dim). I tried to configure a many
to many Relationship type between my Companies Dim & Fact Table Transaction. But I get the error that says
"Companies Dim many to many dimension in the Tansaction measure group requires that the granularity of the Relationship dimension is lower than that of the Relationship measure group "
Any help regarding how to difine Dimensions & Attribute Hierarchies on a Many to many link table is appreciated.

Hi Jaya,
According to your description, you are experiencing the issue when implement many to many relationship by using a bridge table in your SQL Server Analysis Services project, right?
Generally, a bridge table will have a surrogate key for the dimension and a surrogate key to the fact table or a degenerate dimension based on the fact table. Here are some blogs which describe how to implement many to many relationship using a bridge
table.
http://bifuture.blogspot.com/2011/06/ssaskimball-modeling-nm-relation.html
http://www.sqlchick.com/entries/2012/1/22/data-modeling-tip-when-using-many-to-many-bridge-tables-in-s.html
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/22202.a-practical-example-of-how-to-handle-simple-many-to-many-relationships-in-power-pivotssas-tabular-models.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Linked tables, stored procedures, and locking

I'm working on an interface between two Oracle systems. I don't know if they're on the same server or not, but they are definitely two different database instances. The plan for this interface is that when a record is created on one of the systems, it will call a stored procedure on the other system to create the record there as well. I believe the relevant information will be passed via parameters to the stored procedure (not by querying the data in the first system). The ID number created on the second system gets passed back to the first system via an output parameter.
A concern was raised about whether something like this might cause "rev-locking". Similar issues were raised on a different interface, but that interface used a linked table between the two systems. The original design for that interface had a stored procedure initiated from the second system, and it was to update data via the linked table in the first system. But this caused some locking issues. So a different interface was written, that only used the linked table as read-only.
So the question is, do stored procedure calls between linked databases have the same issues as updates directly to linked tables? And a better question is, is there a document or white paper out there somewhere that describes the locking issues between linked databases, and presenting the "best practices" for this type of coding?
Any help is appreciated!
Christine Wolak
[email protected]

So the question is, do stored procedure calls between linked databases have the same issues as updates directly to linked tables? I'm not aware of any issues with updates across databases. can you post a more detail version of what exact issues did you encounter when updating tables across database using database links?
when you update a row in a table, from the same database or another one, a lock on that row will be placed for the duration of the transaction. Others will be able to read that row but not update it till the end of the local (or the remote) transaction.
What issue(s) did you encounter?

Linked Tables in Access DB

I connect to a remote db using odbc connection. All the
tables in the db are linked and I am able to write my CF code to
read the tables and produce reports, etc. Now another person has
gone directly into Access and created a query with some of the
linked tables, and with data from an excel spreadsheet. Since the
query is already built and runs, they want me to take the query and
put it in a CF application so that CF can run it. I am able to
create a table (not linked) in the db and import the data from
excel to populate the table, but when I run CF with the query, it
does not like the table that I created, which I named tblSS_PO.
Here is the error :
Error Diagnostic Information
ODBC Error Code = S0002 (Base table not found)
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Invalid object
name 'tblSS_PO'.
Does it not like it because the table I built is not linked
and not part of the original db ? Anyone with any ideas on how I
can solve this problem ? It seems like the data from excel will be
a consistent thing, all I need to do is plug it in each time and
run the query but I cannot get it to work. Thanks for any help.

You have to have the same version of the access file on the
remote server
(one CF is connecting to) as you have on your local system.
Just changing
your local access file does not change the remote file. you
have to upload
your Access file just like you have to upload your site
pages.
Bryan Ashcraft (remove brain to reply)
Web Application Developer
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Macromedia Certified Dreamweaver Developer
Adobe Community Expert (DW) ::
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
"trojnfn" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ed7kjs$sbo$[email protected]..
>I thought I was putting the table and query in the db.
Like I said, I bring
>up
> Access and open the db and all the tables are there,
even the new one I
> created
> and the query (along with all the other queries) in the
query panel, so it
> looks like they are there. Yet when I run my cf query
with the dsn for the
> db,
> it says the table and query cannot be found. Could it be
that I am really
> connecting to a copy of the db and not the actual db
itself, thus it looks
> like
> it is there but not, since the dsn is to the remot db ?
I am just grasping
> at
> straws here, do not know what is happeng. If I create a
completely
> differenet
> db with the table, will cf allow for two different dsn
at once so that the
> tables from two different dbs can be linked ?
>
>

Help with linking tables

Hello,
I am not really sure if this is a site that this question should be asked but I have done alot of searching and can't seem to find an answer so....
I work for a large company that uses Oracle for its databases.
In my department we use access link tables to look at the Oracle data.
In one such database I need to link to the oracle tables but only see certain data when I open the link (like a fliter).
I have no idea how to do this...I just know it can be done.. I have heard that you can use Oracle views to do the filtering on the server side and it would only return the filtered data. I think I have to do this with SQL.
But I really dont know how to go about it.
So I am posting here hoping that you guys could help me or point me in the right direction as I don't even know what questions to ask in google :)
I will be glad to give any information you may need to help me out.
Thanks a Million.

user12063135 wrote:
Hello,
I have heard that you can use Oracle views to do the filtering on the server side and it would only return the filtered data. I think I have to do this with SQL.
Thanks a Million.You heard it right and your thouts are are floating in the right direction.
Use views and you will be fine.

Problem to acces linked table from Microsoft Access 2010

We have a couple of MS access databases that have linked tables from oracle Database. When the user try to view the content of the table it gets an error saying that the table or view does not exist.
But if i create a new MS access db and link the same tables with the same user, we are able to view the content of the table. So it does not seem to be related to permissions...
If we delete the linked table and try to re-attached them we got the same error
Anyone have a clue ?

It looks like this is a question that should be addressed in our ORACLE ODBC community, since it has to to with MS Access links to an Oracle DB via (I presume) an Oracle ODBC driver.
This community is for Oracle Heterogeneous Gateways. That is, Oracle DB links into 3rd party databases.
Thanks!
Matt

Inserting into Linked table

I am writing some code to copy some data from point A (the client's Oracle database) to point B (the client's DB/2 database). I'm trying to determine the least problematic way of dealing with the inserts to a heterogeneously linked table and updates to the source table.
Working in an ideal world, in one transaction I would insert each row to the linked table and mark the source row as "processed". Each source row produces one target row, and the commit would happen after each row. Will this work and can it be relied upon to commit and/or rollback together, even if the link goes down? My other option, which I've seen done in several pieces of code that we have in our organization, is to perform all actions in local tables, and then at the last minute in a separate transaction, do a bulk copy "insert into tableA select from tableB". Most of these examples are moving data FROM the external table TO our internal database and then processing them.
So my question is, is it always a good idea to do this bulk copy method, or is it mostly necessary only when you're NOT committing after each row? Or is it dependent on what sort of external database you're linking to? If I'm to add an extra "staging" table, then I also have to deal with deleting the rows after they're inserted in to the linked table, and figuring out how to deal with the possibility that this job might be running twice at the same time. So I'd like to avoid it if I can. But if it's all around safer to use an extra table, I will.
Thanks for your thoughts!
Christine Wolak

Kamal, from the example you gave, the table you're inserting into is named "[email protected]", right? That sounds like an Oracle instance. This apparently works fine Oracle-to-Oracle, but not so much when the other side of the link is a different kind of database. In my case, I'm trying to copy the data to a DB2 table. From the text I've seen, the way the "insert into ... select from ..." works, is the TARGET database has to know how to do the "select from" part, and if it's not an Oracle database, there's no guarantee that it can.
I've also found that I cannot even have a distributed transaction of any kind (without buying Oracle's Transparent Gateway Services, I think). I've tried committing my updates of my own table and insert into a remote table from within the same transaction, and I get ORA-02047 (cannot join the distributed transaction).
So it looks like I will be stuck not only copying the rows one by one, but also "crossing my fingers" that my second transaction goes through. Actually, I'm planning something like this:
1. Do my updates in my local table, including setting the "complete" flag to Yes, and commit.
2. Do the insert into the remote table, and commit.
3. If the insert gets an error, change the "complete" flag back to No (so it'll get picked up the next time around), and commit. If THIS step gets an error, I'll log a message indicating that operator intervention is required.
I'm guessing that 99.999% of the time this will run without a hitch, and I think that's pretty much all I can ask for, without buying Transparent Gateway. Unless someone else here as a better suggestion? I'm all ears...
Christine

User - Profile link table?

Hi All,
We are connecting via SAP JCo to an ECC 6.0 system. The task is to retrieve all users that have a specific set of profiles.
Currently we are using RFC_READ_TABLE on USR02 to get a list of User Names, and then with each name making a call to BAPI_GET_USER_DETAIL and then checking if the user has the specified profile.
This works fine if almost all users have one of the specified profiles, but isnt so great if only a few of them do as it makes a call to the BAPI for every user. It would be much better if we only had to make the BAPI call for those users that we already knew had the specified profiles.
My question, Surely there is a link table or somewhere that links the users to the profiles, Where abouts is this, or what is it called.
Any help or pointers would be much appreciated.

Hi Paul,
There is a standard SAP report that list users assigned to a specific role (program name is RSUSR002). I've had a quick skim through the code and there's nothing obvious, but you may find something of use in there.
Regards,
Nick

How can I link table KONV with table VBRP and VBRK using KSCHL field?

Hi experts,
How can I link table KONV with table VBRP/VBRK using KSCHL field so that items are fully filtered?
Thanks,

Hi,
If you do not want to specify it as hard code, then define a variable for it if you want to pass the value for it from the selection screen so that it will be dynamic. Code will be as follows.
select-options: x_KSCHL for T685l-KSCHL.
select kwert
           kbetr
           knumv
           kposn
           kschl
      from konv
      into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_konv
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_all
      where knumv = it_all-knumv
      and   kposn = it_all-b_posnr
      and   kschl in x_KSCHL. "Dynamic Selection as per the selection screen input
endif.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Chandravadan

How to programmatically connect to MS Access linked tables to oracle ?

Hi,
I have database in MS Access which has linked table in oracle database.
But I am not able to connect to that linked table through java program .
It gives me java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] ODBC--connection to 'servername' failed.
Can anybody suggest me how to tackle this problem?

This blog post should have most (if not all) of what you need:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2009/02/16/how-can-i-use-windows-powershell-to-create-an-office-access-database.aspx
One thing to watch out for is the db provider for the connection string. The "Jet Engine" has been superseded by
ACE.

Linking tables......!!!!!!!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for