Links when through proxy?

Hi,
I'm trying to configure an Apache2 server as a reverse proxy for 10gAS. I have almost everything working, but it seems that all of the links on webapages for portal, OID, etc., including links for CSS files and images, are pointing to the directly to the Oracle server.
Is there any way to configure Oracle so that links in pages it serves will either be relative or have the hostname of the Apache proxy server?
Thanks,
Jim

Hi Jim,
Have you performed following:
- Re-register mod_osso at SSO Middle-tier
- Re-register mod_osso at Portal Middle-tier
- Stop Portal Middle-tier
- Clear plsql and session cache at Portal Middle-Tier Home.
Hope this works.
Regards

Similar Messages

Lync Sign in issue through Proxy

Hi All,
Not to be confused when said Lync Sign in issue through Proxy as it is unlikely that this is an issue with the proxy settings. Find it out yourself from the behavior below.
It is in fact a weird issue that I have come across.
Overall there are almost 30 Lync Users accounts.
And they are trying to authenticate to external Lync Server.
28/30 works fine through the proxy. Except for 2 user accounts.
The proxy settings are same for all the users and no individual configurations set.
Now, here is the interesting part. Go out of the network and authenticate this 2 user account to any of the workstation which is not going through Proxy, it works. Come back to the workstation which is going through the proxy and try again, it will work
now.
Now, I am interested in finding how exactly does Microsoft authenticates their Lync users. And what are the step by step procedure of User Authentication for Lync service. And why is this happening?
Just to add some more point here, these happens only with 2 specific accounts.
And if you try using these 2 accounts on any of the 28 working workstations, which is going through the proxy, the first time, it would still fail to get authenticated.
Can someone put a highlight on these behaviors? is there any user specific settings on the lync server?
Thanks for your inputs.

You can check the following blogs about Lync authentication process:
http://blog.schertz.name/2012/12/lync-2013-client-autodiscover/
http://blogs.technet.com/b/nexthop/archive/2012/11/28/lync-2010-client-authentication.aspx
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or
suitability of any software or information found there. Please make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
You can enable Lync client logging to collect the log file to check the sign in process for these two users can’t sign in externally.
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

Strange problem with cut-through proxy

hi
i have configured cut- through proxy on the router with acs.i am facing a strange problem .
my routers's ethernet 3/0 interface ip add is 10.1.1.1/24 and the acs server is 10.1.1.2/24 and the host ip is 10.1.1.3/24
my routers' e2/0 interface is connected a server running a website .
int e2/0
no shutdown
ip add 20.1.1.1/24
exit
the webserver is running on 20.1.1.2
my router's config
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default group tacacs+
aaa authorization auth-proxy default group tacacs+
aaa authorization exec default group tacacs+
tacacs-server host 10.1.1.2
tacacs-server key cisco
ip http server
ip http authentication aaa
ip access-list 101 permit tcp host 10.1.1.2 eq tacacs host 10.1.1.1
ip auth-proxy name auth http
int e3/0
no shutdown
ip add 10.1.1.1/24
ip access-group 101 in
ip auth-proxy auth
exit
on the acs server in the tacacs+ ios
i have selected auth-proxy in the services for users and groups
i have created a user john with privilege level 15
have selected auth-proxy and custom attributes
proxyacl#1=permit tcp any any priv-lvl=15
i get the auth-proxy login page when the host on 10.1.1.3 is trying to access 20.1.1.2 web site .
after putting the login credentials i get authentication failed
i tried the debug. i see the router is sending the authentication login and password and getting the status from the acs as pass. i also see the auth-proxy triggered. in there i see
AUTH-PROXY PROTOCOL NOT CONFIGURED.
could someone pls help me what could be the problem. i am have tried many times to get this work. but not fortunate enough.
am i missing on any commands on the router or on the acs. i tried doing as the example mentioned in the student guide but still failed. pls help. waiting for some reply.
sebastan

Check out the following link...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080450b5e.html

One more reason to put my iMAC at the curb. I can open and view Picasa photo links when I sign in via Google, but if I'm in Mail and click on the Picasa image link (my own or one someone esle sends me I can't view the images. Thye are all blank white squa

One more reason to put my iMAC at the curb. I can open and view Picasa photo links when I sign in via Google, but if I'm in Mail and click on the Picasa image link (my own or one someone else sends me) I can't view the images. They are all blank white squares. This started a few weeks ago. Why can't I view Picasa link images through Mail?

What you are experiencing is 100% related to Malware.
Sometimes a problem with Firefox may be a result of malware installed on your computer, that you may not be aware of.
You can try these free programs to scan for malware, which work with your existing antivirus software:
* [http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/default.aspx Microsoft Safety Scanner]
* [http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free/ MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware]
* [http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208283363 TDSSKiller - AntiRootkit Utility]
* [http://www.surfright.nl/en/hitmanpro/ Hitman Pro]
* [http://www.eset.com/us/online-scanner/ ESET Online Scanner]
[http://windows.microsoft.com/MSE Microsoft Security Essentials] is a good permanent antivirus for Windows 7/Vista/XP if you don't already have one.
Further information can be found in the [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Error When connecting proxy

Hi,
When I try to connect proxy in application, it is not connecting instead when I check whether it is going through proxy or not it is telling that it is establishing direct connection only. Here I have posted part of the coding. Please If any error give me a hint.
            System.setProperty("ProxySet", "true");
            SocketAddress addr = new InetSocketAddress("webcache.mydomain.com",80);
            proxy=new Proxy(Proxy.Type.HTTP,addr);here in this code part I am checking whether is connecting with proxy or not.
URL u = new URL(url);
URLConnection uu=u.openConnection(ScrapperInterface.proxy);
try
                URI uuu = uu.getURL().toURI();
                List l=ProxySelector.getDefault().select(uuu);
                for (Iterator iter = l.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); )
                     Proxy proxy = (Proxy) iter.next();
                     System.out.println("proxy hostname : " +proxy.type());
                     InetSocketAddress add = (InetSocketAddress)proxy.address();
                     if(add == null)
                         System.out.println("No Proxy");
                     else
                         System.out.println("proxy hostname : " +add.getHostName());
                         System.out.println("proxy port : " +add.getPort());
catch (URISyntaxException ex)
                Logger.getLogger(StartThread.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}Output is:
proxy hostname : DIRECT
No Proxy

Re: Error When connecting proxy You didn't get any error when you created the connection. Your title is misleading. Probably you are misleading yourself - see below.
System.setProperty("ProxySet", "true");That does nothing. There is no such property, contrary to widespread belief.
SocketAddress addr = new InetSocketAddress("webcache.mydomain.com",80);
proxy=new Proxy(Proxy.Type.HTTP,addr);... and using java.net.Proxy has nothing to do with system properties in any case.
URLConnection uu=u.openConnection(ScrapperInterface.proxy);Here you are opening a URLConnection via the proxy. As you got output from the code further down it is clear that this step must have succeeded. So all the code below is pointless.
URI uuu = uu.getURL().toURI();Here you are getting the URI you created the connection for.
List l=ProxySelector.getDefault().select(uuu);Here you are getting the Proxies the default ProxySelector would have given you for that URI. Nothing to do with the URLConnection you created, and nothing to do with the Proxy you created either.
InetSocketAddress add = (InetSocketAddress)proxy.address();So here you are testing the proxy address for the system's default proxy for that URI. Again, nothing to do with what you did above.
What you should be doing here is using the URLConnection you have already created. Not testing an address.

Getting through proxy servers

Hello,
Does anyone know if the URLRequest / Loader classes are able
to connect through proxy servers? In other words, does Flash read
the PC's proxy configuration and automatically use it?
Also, I was wondering, if one was to create a Socket and then
connect to a web site...
mySocket.connect("www.mydoman.com", 80);
but the user's PC uses a proxy server to connect to the
Internet, would this
connection succeed or fail?
Thanks for your insight.
Dan

Check the links below out. I think it may help you out some.
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-519
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-673

BPC Connection Through Proxy

Deal All,
We could not connect BPC through proxy server. Can anybody let me know any specific setting required.
Best Regards
Shesh

Sorin,
Thank you so much for the reply.
I think you are saying that when I connect that when I am connecting directly to BPCWEB it is saying knows you are authenticated to the windows domain. But when it gets it from the proxy server it is now not you anymore the BPCWEB server sees it coming from the proxy server NOT the windows domain.
So instead of DOMAIN/userID connecting it is PROXY/userID connecting. BPC doesn't know you. This cannot be the first time this has been seen.
Do you know a way around this? I am currently using sapwebdispatcher as my reverse proxy here, however I do not mind trying other products.
Would you have any recommendations on what your other clients use as a reverse proxy for BPC.
To simply things, we have DOMAIN users ---> Reverse proxy box ---> BPC Web .NET Server. We want to eliminte the ability for direct access to the BPC web .NET Server
Thanks again... any help would be great as we have been struggling for a few weeks to get this silly access issue resolved.
Edited by: Russell Hull on Feb 20, 2010 7:24 PM

ASA - Cut-through proxy probleme

I have to configure my ASA 7.2.2 for cut-through proxy but when the users use authentication prompt ,
but only , for (http://1.1.0.2/netaccess/connstatus.html) the ASA send the following message:
User Authentication
User Authentication is not required.
help me
it is ok when one uses cut-through-proxy by ACL :
access-list ACL_INT extended permit tcp object-group PC-UAUTH_DYN host MVINCT19 eq www
access-list ACL_AUTH line 1 extended permit tcp host poste_auvinet host MVINCT19 eq www
aaa-server auth_inside protocol radius
aaa-server auth_inside host SVR-ACS-IN
key xxx
username admin password xxx privilege 15
aaa authentication match ACL_AUTH inside auth_inside
aaa authentication listener http inside port www
on a pix 525 is OK

Hi,
The config looks good. Please remember that successful authentication is cached (show uauth) and till it expires user will not need to authenticate again.
Please clear uauth and see if it helps.
Regards,
Vivek

OSB 11g with PASS-THROUGH PROXY

hello all,
I my designing on latest Fusion Middleware 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.5.0)
a http soap based osb proxy service wraped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection service policy
a http soap based osb business service wrapped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection client policy
a standalone client is calling this Passive Intermediary Proxy
In case of pass-through proxy service,
I would like to know that is it necessary that the policy contract between client --->proxy should be similar to proxy--->backend
I think so, because proxy is not atall touching the entire stuff starting from <soap:envelope>.........</soap:envelope>
So client-sent tokens etc. must match with what back end service requires.
In general, what am I buying by routing the client call through pass-through proxy service if the back-end webservice requires that entire message must by encrypted. In this case there is nothing open for the proxy to view and make any decisions based on that through its pipeline pairs etc.

Check out the following link...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080450b5e.html

FRM-92102 through proxy

IE 6.x / Win XP
eTrus PROXY / Win XP
AS 10g 9.0.4 / Linux Red Hat
We are migrating from 6i to 9i.
With the 6i (cgi) we no have connect problems through proxy, but with 9i, after the second call the error appear.
We could run the first form/menu, but when this form call_form another form or call an LOV the error appear.
In the logs the conection to the AS is broken (possible from client, in this case the client is the PROXY).
If we skip the use of PROXY (in the Browser), the application can run success, we can call_form or LOVs.
Tx in advance for any help.
DL

Please take a look to the parameter networkRetries - if it is set in the formsweb.cfg or static.html.
See Note:216639.1

MAK activation through Proxy activate

dear all
good day
I'am using VAMT to activate all computers in my domain by using MAK activation, when I activate a windows 8.1 through "proxy activate" I found that the remaining activation count was decreased by 2 not by 1 when I apply the
confirmation ID.
while when iam using the same activation method to activate office pro 2010 it's work normally and decrease the activation count only by 1.
could any one help me and explain why is this happened and how to fix this problem.
thank you

Hi,
Did this happen for all computer with windows 8.1?
If you are activating a MAK key, you can retrieve the remaining number of activations for that key by selecting the MAK in the product key list in the center pane and then clicking
Refresh product key data online in the right-side pane. This retrieves the number of remaining activations for the MAK from Microsoft. Note that this step requires Internet access and that the remaining activation count can only be retrieved
for MAKs.
Regards.
Vivian Wang

[svn:osmf:] 14007: Partial fix for FM-383: ProxyElement needs to dispatch traitRemove/ traitAdd event pairs when the proxy adds or removes a trait that also exists on the proxied element .

Revision: 14007
Revision: 14007
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-02-05 11:54:43 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
Partial fix for FM-383: ProxyElement needs to dispatch traitRemove/traitAdd event pairs when the proxy adds or removes a trait that also exists on the proxied element.
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-383
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/media/MediaElement.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/proxies/ProxyElement.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/proxies/TestProxyElementAsDynamicProxy.as

ASA Cut through proxy configuration

Hi guys,
I would like to configure limited internet access to olnly a select group of Windows AD users.
I beleive cut-through proxy will allow me to do this, just not sure how to configure it on a Cisco ASA-5510
thanks

The link given will definitely work however you would not be able to select access based on the AD group, if that is what you need to achieve and you have ASA version 8.0 you can work Cut-Through-Proxy together with DAP.
Using Cut-Trough-Proxy with a standard authentication server will only allow or reject depending on the authentication result, but any user within your AD schema will be able to get internet access. If you need to restrict this based o Windows Groups as well your best shot is Cut-Through-Proxy with DAP and LDAP:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_white_paper09186a00809fcf38.shtml

LMS 4.0.1 tries to connect to itself through proxy

Hello,
I am experiencing a weird issue with LMS 4.0.1 running on Windows 2008 R2 Standard Edition.
LMS 4.0.1 can connect to the Internet through a web proxy. This proxy does not require authentication. I need to configure proxy in LMS in order to quickly update LMS (by doing Device Updates for CiscoView and Inventory Config)
As soon as I configure proxy settings for CCO connection (i.e, under Admin -> Cisco.com settings -> Proxy Server Setup), LMS stops working properly. In particlar, ANI database breaks down (this is actually still running, but connection to ANI is impossible).
After doing packets capture, I noticed that LMS server (which is called SRVLMS01) tries to connect to itself *through the proxy* when configured. Of course, this does not work (the proxy refuses such connection) - see below (especially packet #8):
4 0.002564 <LMS IP address> <Proxy IP address> HTTP POST http://SRVLMS01:1741/CSCOnm/servlet/com.cisco.nm.cmf.servlet.LwmsMainServlet?fromCLI=true HTTP/1.1
5 0.002585 <LMS IP address> <Proxy IP address> HTTP Continuation or non-HTTP traffic
6 0.003617 <Proxy IP address> <LMS IP address> TCP http-alt > 34514 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=763 Win=64938 Len=0
7 0.007023 <Proxy IP address> <LMS IP address> TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
8 0.007025 <Proxy IP address> <LMS IP address> HTTP HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden (text/html)
Everything recovers when removing proxy settings and restarting LMS processes (that is, ANI server comes back online).
FYI, Internet Explorer on LMS server is configured so that proxy settings are bypassed when connecting to http://srvlms01 or to http://<LMS server IP address>. Using IE on the server itself to connect to LMS works just fine.
Of course, I could remove LMS proxy settings and download all CiscoView packages manually, but that would be really painful.
Kind regards
Pierre-Loic

Bonjour Pierre-Loic,
Can you try on the server to use the resolver.pl in /opt/CSCOpx/bin to resolve the hostname of the server and it's IP address.
Do they resolve to what you think they should?
Meanwhile, download the device package updates can be done quite quickly, installing them can take longer I noticed.
Cheers,
Michel

Visits through proxy servers (was: Just plain CREEPY!)

Has anyone else had this happen to them. I have inserted CODE on all my websites to TRACK anyone visiting my websites pages…
Since I joined the Adobe forum ALL the visits that are germane to this forum are 90% through Proxy servers!!!!!!
But that's not even the creepiest part… Why am I getting visited from the following IPs since joining the adobe Forums…..
The US Department of Justice
The US Secretary of State
The US Department of the Army
The Colorado State Secretary office and
and of all places... NASA!
And countless PROXY servers!

I have just returned from a meeting in which we discussed your case.
In trying to get to the bottom of the situation, we even considered if the 13th April may have been a factor. We soon realised that this could not be the case because when I first heard of it in the morning of 13th April, half the world would still register 12th April as the date.
Another peculiarity, your first post was time stamped
Apr 13, 2013 7:37 PM
an answer to the post
1. Sudarshan Thiagarajan,
Apr 13, 2013 2:57 PM
The answer was submitted 4.5 hours before you posting the incident(s)
I'm with you bro! We need to stick together and see it through. Never mind the non-believers, we do not need them. Be strong!
I'll be back.

Links when through proxy?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for