Loading datastore with multiple interfaces

We want to have multiple interfaces load the same datastore. Each of these processes can run in parallel. The problem we have is when the LKM fires it creates a C$ table with the same name in each interface. Is there a way to prevent this from creating a duplicate name?
Troy

Hi-
Whenever ODI creates a loading table it will add the prefix with the name of C$ with the name of your table name. That is the reason you are getting the table name with more than 30 characters.
Loading table prefix is a mandatory field that should be there in your physical schema definition. So whenever you are creating a table it should not exceed the characters defined in the technology or database.
Thanks,
Saravanan Rajavel

Similar Messages

Is it possible to load transaction with multiple batch_source_name??

Hi,
I am calling 'Autoinvoice Master Program' for creating transactions in my custom package.
I have 15 lines in my data file. They are invoices, credit memos, debit memos with different batch_source_name.
Import program is picking tranasctions with any one of batch_source_name & update the base table.
15 lines are populated in interface(ra_interface_lines_all) but base table (ra_customer_trx_all) populated with few line.
Is it possible to load transactions & call the AutoInvoice with multiple batch_source_name in one data file ??
Please help me on this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Manish
Edited by: user12143717 on Mar 4, 2010 6:49 AM
Edited by: user12143717 on Mar 11, 2010 6:16 AM

Hi,
I cannot find a method to achieve this. You may try to create a new contact folder and copy the contacts you want to use to the new contact folder, and then mail merge from the newly created contact folder.
Regards,
Steve Fan
TechNet Community Support
It's recommended to download and install
Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
programs.

Setting The Default Route in a Jumpstart Install with Multiple Interfaces

Greetings,
I'm performing a Jumpstart install on a SPARC v240 server, which has multiple network interfaces. I'm trying to configure all of the interfaces as part of the Jumpstart setup. However, Jumpstart doesn't like the default route that I'm supplying. If I add the default_route parameter anywhere but under the first interface, Jumpstart complains that the default route is missing (by making me add it after it dumps out to the suninstall screens. If I add the default route under the first interface, Jumpstart dumps me to the suninstall screen which says that the route could not be added.
What am I doing wrong ? Am I trying to get Jumpstart to do something that it won't do ?
Here is my sysidcfg file. The file shown below will cause Jumpstart to dump to the suninstall screen, which will indicate that the route cannot be added:
Please wait while the system information is loaded... /
Please wait while the system is configured with your settings...
The route provided could not be added at this time. If you wish to accept the
route provided, press 'Accept' and the address will be added for reboot,
otherwise press 'Cancel' and provide another address.
1. Accept
2. Cancel
Enter the number corresponding to your choice [1]
Here is the sysidcfg file:
name_service=NONE
network_interface=bge0
{hostname=conwe125
ip_address=10.15.8.122
netmask=255.255.0.0
default_route=158.73.175.254
protocol_ipv6=no}
network_interface=bge1
{ip_address=10.15.9.122
netmask=255.255.0.0
protocol_ipv6=no}
network_interface=bge3
{ip_address=158.73.175.117
netmask=255.255.0.0
protocol_ipv6=no}
network_interface=ce0
{ip_address=10.16.0.208
netmask=255.255.0.0
protocol_ipv6=no}
network_interface=ce3
{ip_address=158.73.175.118
netmask=255.255.255.0
protocol_ipv6=no}
root_password=5Z5XTytD2Eddo
security_policy=NONE
terminal=vt100
system_locale=en_US.ISO8859-1
timezone=US/Eastern
timeserver=localhost
Thanks In Advance,
Chris Hanrahan

That sysidcfg seems a bit odd anyway, have you by any chance put the different interfaces of your jumpstart server into it? Normally you won't need to specify a default router since the jumpstart will figure it out anyway.. Does your jumpstart server have an interface on each network you want to jumpstart?
7/M.

Timesten replication with multiple interfaces sharing the same hostname

Hi,
we have in our environment two Sun T2000 nodes, running SunOS 5.10 and hosting a TT server currently in Release 7.0.5.9.0, replicated between each other.
I would like to have some more information on the behavior of the replication w.r.t. network reliability when using two interfaces associated to the same hostname, the one used to define the replication element.
To make an example we have our nodes sharing this common /etc/hosts elements:
151.98.227.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-10 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.226.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-01 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.227.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-10 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
151.98.226.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-01 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
with the following element defined for replication:
ALTER REPLICATION REPLSCHEME
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_1 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_2 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST;
On this subject moving from 6.0.x to 7.0.x there has been some changes I would like to better understand.
6.0.x reported in the documentation for Unix systems:
If a host contains multiple network interfaces (with different IP addresses),
TimesTen replication tries to connect to the IP addresses in the same order as
returned by the gethostbyname call. It will try to connect using the first address;
if a connection cannot be established, it tries the remaining addresses in order
until a connection is established.
Now On Solaris I don't know how to let gethostbyname return more than one interface (the documention notes at this point:
If you have multiple network interface cards (NICs), be sure that “multi
on” is specified in the /etc/host.conf file. Otherwise, gethostbyname will not
return multiple addresses).
But I understand this could be valid for Linux based systems not for Solaris.
Now if I properly understand the above, how was the 6.0.x able to realize the first interface in the list (using the same -ttrep hostname) was down and use the other, if gethostbyname was reporting only a single entry ?
Once upgraded to 7.0.x we realized the ADD ROUTE option was added to teach TT how to use different interfaces associated to the same hostname. In our environment we did not include this clause, but still the replication was working fine regardless of which interface we were bringing down.
My both questions in the end lead to the same doubt on which is the algorithm used by TT to reach the replicated node w.r.t. entries in the /etc/hosts.
Looking at the nodes I can see that by default both routes are being used:
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.227."
151.98.225.104.45312 151.98.227.4.14000 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.47307 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.48230 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.46050 151.98.227.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.226."
151.98.226.5.14000 151.98.226.4.47699 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.14005 151.98.226.4.47308 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.44949 151.98.226.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
Tried to trace with ttTraceMon but once I brought down one of the interfaces did not see any reaction on either node, if you have some info it would be really appreciated !
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply, I have few more queries on this.
1.Using the ROUTE CLAUSE we can use multiple IPs using priority level set, so that if highest priority level set in thr ROUTE clause for the IP is not active it will fall back to the next level priority 2 set IP. But cant we use ROUTE clause to use the multiple route IPs for replication simultaneously?
2. can we execute multiple schema for the same DSN and replication scheme but with different replication route IPs?
for example:
At present on my system, I have a replication scheme running for a specific DSN with stand alone Master-Subscriber mechanism, with a specific route IP through VLAN-xxx for replication.
Now I want to create and start another replication scheme for the same DSN and replication mechanism with a different VLAN-yyy route IP to be used for replication in parallel to the existing replication scheme. without making any changes to the pre-existing replication scheme.
for the above scenarios, will there be any specific changes respective to the different replication schema mechanism ie., Active Standby and Standalone Master Subscriber mechanism etc.,
If so what are the steps. like how we need to change the existing schema?
Thanks In advance.
Naveen

Load balancing with multiple clusters (HTTPProxyServlet)

          Hello!
          I'm newbie in Weblogic. I would like to have clustering and load balancing in
          development environment. I've created 2 clusters, with one managed server each.
          I've created a web application for deploying the http proxy servlet and put it
          under another managed server without clustering. Below is my configuration:
          managed server without cluster (as proxy) - Port 8002
          admin server - Port 8001
          cluster_1 - multicast address 237.0.0.11, multicast port 8004, cluster address
          - t3://localhost:8006, t3://localhost:8007
          cluster_2 - multicast address 237.0.0.10, multicast port 8014, cluster address
          - t3://localhost:8006, t3://localhost:8007
          managed_cluster1 - under cluster_1, port 8006
          managed_cluster2 - under cluster_2, port 8007
          in the web.xml of the proxy, i put the following parameters:
          <param-name>WebLogicCluster</param-name>
          <param-value>localhost:8006|localhost:8007</param-value>
          However, when i send the requests to http://localhost:8002/sms, the requests always
          go to the same server, for eg: managed_cluster2?
          If i configure using single cluster, the load balancing will be in proper. What's
          the cause fo the problem? and any solution?
          Thanx in advance.
          Regards,
          joey


You have 2 options here Jordi, either you can use BGP loadbalancing, this requires multipath as BGP by default would only install one route from the BGP table to the RIB hence FIB.
But this may result in excessive IRL (inter rack link) usage in the cluster when traffic coming in on rack0 wants to take the bGP path out on rack1
You could also use ABF (access-list based forwarding) to forcelly push traffic received on rack0 out on the link on rack0 and use an ipsla tracker to fallback to rack1 in case the uplink is gone.
Alternatively to extend this by IGP signaling to redirect traffic preferably to rack1 to start with to minimize the IRL usage.
And then you also have the ability to use RPL in the uplink path to make one link more preferred on teh internet then the other in case you want to control a bit which link is preferably used on rack0 or rack1
regards
xander

Single data set, loaded once, with multiple xpath paths?

All,
Is it possible to load xml via a URL one time on a page
request and then
create mutliple datasets from that single call using
different xpath
expressions? sort of like doing a mega query then creating
subsets of that
query?
something like:
<root>
<process type="1" blah="blah"/>
<process type="1" blah="blah2"/>
<process type="2" blah="blah3"/>
</root>
ds1 = new XMLDataSet(blah.cfm,"/root/process[@type=1]";
ds2 = new XMLDataSet(blah.cfm,"/root/process[@type=2]";
what i really need to do is make that cfm call one time per
load.
thanks for any help.
Marc

Surely. Sorry for not being more specific earlier.
I'm currently using the tab widget. there are about 5 tabs
total. each of
those tabs represents a list of process in a given "status",
like "running",
"pending", etc. Currently, the way I create this is to run a
big old query
that gets ALL processes, and then I loop over that query,
grouping on the
Process Status, and create a tab for each status. I'm not
using any
spry:repeat regions or anything like that currently. In fact,
the only spry
i'm using at all is for the tab widget. the query is just a
query that runs
when the page loads. it's not doing any spry data loading
with XMLDataSet or
anything.
However, I'd like to convert this process to using the
XMLDataSet so that I
can use the spry repeat regions. What I'd like, then, is to
pass a cfm page
as the XML param. this would return the same query i'm
running now, except
in xml format. I'd also like to pass the loadInterval param
so that I can
avail myself of the automatic data refreshing so that all of
the tabs will
have their content updated at the specified interval, as
opposed to doing it
with a page refresh which is how I do it now (which is just a
brute force
way of rerunning the query and recreating all html).
so in the end what i end up with is 5 tabs, each representing
a status,
whose data comes from the same xml but whose tab content is a
subset of that
xml. the loadinterval then ensures that all tabs are updated
at the
appropriate frequency.
how's that? clearer?
thanks again!
Marc
"CristianC MARIN" <[email protected]> wrote
in message
news:erch4i$erv$[email protected]..
> Hello Marc,
>
> Could you please describe me in more details what do you
mean by reload
> param and your exact use case to make sure I have the
entire picture in
> mind when I'll answer you?
>
> Cristian

Generics bug with multiple interface inheritance?

Hi,
I've noticed what I believe to be a compiler bug (I am getting an error where I believe none should exist). Can someone please comment on the following use-case?
interface Interface1<SelfType extends Interface1<SelfType>>
interface Interface2
class Superclass implements A<Superclass>
class Dependant<Type extends Interface1<Type>>
   public static <Type extends Interface1<Type>> Dependant<Type> getInstance(Class<Type> c)
     return new Dependant<Type>();
class Subclass extends Superclass implements Interface2
Subclass()
    Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
}The problem is that in the above code the compiler will complain that Dependant<Subclass> is illegal because "Subclass is not within its bounds" . The compiler requires that Subclass implement Interface1 and Interface2 directly and implementing Interface1 by extending Superclass doesn't seem to count. If you replace Subclass's definition by "class Subclass implements Interface1<Subclass>, Interface2" the problem goes away.
Is this a compiler bug?
Thank you,
Gili

Actually now I understand what you mean.... Ok, now I am going to modify the problem slightly and add Interface2 into the picture. The new code is:
interface Interface1<SelfType extends Interface1<SelfType>>
interface Interface2
class Superclass implements Interface1<Superclass>
class Dependant<Type extends Interface1<Type>>
   public static <Type extends Interface1<Type> & Interface2> Dependant<Type> getInstance(Class<Type> c)
     return new Dependant<Type>();
class Subclass extends Superclass implements Interface2
public Subclass()
    Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
}Now, previously I could replace:
Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
with
Dependant<Superclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Superclass.class);
and it solved the problem, but now that Type must implement Interface2 I cannot.
The reason I added this requirement is that this is actually what is going on in my applicationI had made mistakely omited this detail from the original use-case.
Can you think up of a possible solution to this new use-case?
Thanks,
Gili

Dual uplinks with single 5400 and single 6509 (with multiple interface cards)

I have a single 5400 with two gige ports and a single 6509 with dual gige line cards.
What would be the best method for running them with dual connections in case an interface or line card goes bad?
Thanks in advance.

Thank you for the reply Joseph. I swear I've ran SLA on 6500's before. This box is running IOS 12.2 so maybe that's the culprit.
I found a simple way to configure both devices redundantly using administrative distanced routes pointing through a specified interface. On the 6509, the routes point to a loopback address on the 5400, on the 5400 it's configured as default routes. Like this document explains:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/27082-ip-static-routes.html
Seems to work like a champ.

Loading project with multiple libs.execs error

I used workshop to create a project with several shared libraries and several executables. Things were going along just fine until I quit and tried to re-load the project. Now I get the following error:
"${PATH}/Foo.prd", line 448: Error Object ""Foo.so"" used in assignment has not been defined.
Error: Internal consistency error in "../src/prdparse.cc", line 1105.
I have see one other post on this error but it did not have any replies.
Thanks for any help I can get!

I'm working on a java project divided in 2 packages
"test" and "agentslibrary".I'm working on a project divided into roughly 200 packages.
I have to retrieve some results frome some classes
(even in different package).So? No difference to classes in the same package, apart from the import.
Now I am using static methods to do this,What does static have to do with anything?
but I have
some problems and getting some nullpointer
exception.Then you have bugs in your code.
Which is the best way to do it?
Moreover I have a class("myagent") which extends
another("agent"). From a main class I instanciate
"myagent" but when I try to use a get method inside
Agent (the superclass of the class I just
instanciated) , I get a nullpointer error.Probably because you implemented something incorrectly. NPEs have nothing to do with packages or the "static" keyword or whatever.

[solved] Arch linux access point with multiple interfaces for the NAT

Hi, I have a router running Arch linux. It is connected via LAN (let's call it eth0) to the internet. It has a second LAN interface, eth1, and a wireless interface in master mode, wlan0.
Now, Everything works perfectly except providing network connectivity on eth1 and wlan0 simultaneously. I followed the guide in the "Internet share" wiki article and use dnsmasq/hostapd for the AP. It appears as if all traffic from the router is sent to the wlan0 interface, even if it came in through eth1 (for example, dhcp requests). I cannot really find information how to solve this. The words "bonding" and "iptables" are floating around, but there is not really an easy to understand tutorial for this.
What do I need to do to use both the eth1 and wlan0 interface (for different clients!) on my router?
Best regards, and thank you in advance
Jan Oliver
/e: This seems to be my problem: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7000318 How do I solve this using the usual iptables? (The way described in the article doesn't work: "RTNETLINK answers: No such process" errors.)
Last edited by janoliver (2013-09-25 22:24:53)

Or you could bridge eth1 and wlan0, and make dnsmasq bind/listen on that bridge...

I.E./Active X problem loading movie with multiple .swf

I have a webpage that loads .swf's into a main "container"
swf, and I've found a fix for the I.E./Active X (this is a good
bookmark:
http://www.kirupa.com/developer/flash8/flash_fix.htm
). But the container seems to get stuck on the preloader now? Any
ideas?
PROBLEM PAGE HERE
WORKING PAGE HERE

FRAME 1:
System.useCodepage = true;
main="";
pageNum=1;
if (_framesloaded > 50){
//if (_framesloaded == _totalframes){
gotoAndStop (8);
} else {
gotoAndPlay(1);
FRAME 7:
gotoAndPlay(1);
FRAME 8:
if (whichFrame == "return"){
gotoAndStop (20);
less6.gotoAndStop(2);
} else {
gotoAndStop("splash");
FRAME 20:
if (_framesloaded == _totalframes){
gotoAndStop ("p14");
} else {
gotoAndPlay(10);
}

HttpClusterServlet Proxy Load Balancing with Multiple Clusters

          How do I load balance JSPs and Servlets using the HttpClusterServlet proxy server
          approach when I have more than one cluster?
          It appears from the docs that there is a 1 to 1 relationship between the non-clustered
          managed proxy server that has the HttpClusterServlet and the cluster (1 proxy
          to 1 cluster).


Preferred method would be domain, domainhash, url or urlhash as described in:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/css/bsccfggd/contrule.htm#xtocid2610122.
do not recommend to use round-robin method for load balancing internet proxies. It creates inefficient usage of the storage and bandwidth, as more proxies can have to cache the same objects.

One SOAP-SOAP scenario with multiple interfaces

Hi,
I am developing a scenario SOAP-SOAP using PI 7.10 Sp6.
The wsdl has around 8 service interfaces and i am planning to create 8 Outbound and 8 Inbound interfaces for the same mesg type and create a scenario without MM or Operation mapping.
If I plan to use only one Sender CC and only one configuration scenario for this developement, how do I provide my end point in the following format?
http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?senderParty=&senderService=<SEND_BS>&interface=Interface_Out&receiverParty=&receiverService=<RECV_BS>&interfaceNamespace=http://test.com/xi/SAP/
Venkat.

Raj/Pavan,
I added other service interfaces to one service interface in operations.
But the request messages have not appeared because of which it is throwing an exception when I activate the message interface.
I do not have problems on the receiving side, One receiver CC should take care of the problem as we dont specify in the recvr SOAP action attribute.
I am worried about sender side only !
Thanks,
Venkat.
Just now I created a dummy DT, MT and SI and added this to existing even that request message did not show up in the SI.
Edited by: Venkat A on Jun 16, 2010 11:03 AM

TCPDump with multiple interfaces

Hi,
I'm wondering if its possible to use TCPDump to capture traffic (to a file) from all interfaces on a server simulteanously under Solaris 10? From the TCPDump man pages, this seems to be possible under Linux by specifying "-i any" but this doesn't seem to work in Solaris. Would any know if there is an equivilent option, or even a more round-about way of achieving this?
One think I thought was I could start seperate TCPDump processes for each interface, writing the output of each interface to seperate files. Then after capture was complete, we would cat all the files together and use a program such as Ethereal or Wireshark to sort and interpret the output. Has anyone ever done this and or know if it would work?
Thanks,
- Adrian

Have you tried snoop? It can only capture from one interface at a time, but it may be worth a look since it is the native Sun utility used to capture network packets on a Solaris machine.
john

Generics with multiple interfaces

I'm trying to figure out why the following is not valid:
public class MediaService<L extends Deque<MediaFile> & List<MediaFile>> {
        L x = new LinkedList<MediaFile>();
}Gives:
Type mismatch: cannot convert from LinkedList<MediaFile> to LSeeing as LinkedList implements both these interfaces, I would expect this to be legal. What else is the use of the & operator in Generics?

lhunath wrote:
Basically:
public static <T extends Deque<MediaFile> & List<MediaFile>> T newMediaList() {
return new LinkedList<MediaFile>();
It is possible to do this using covariant return types and a generic abstract factory, like this:
import java.util.Deque;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
public class GT20 {
   public static void main(String[] args) {
      DequeListFactory<String, ?> factory = new LinkedListFactory<String>();
      Deque<String> d = factory.create();
      List<String> l = factory.create();
   private interface DequeListFactory<T, L extends Deque<T> & List<T>> {
      L create();
   private static class LinkedListFactory<T> implements DequeListFactory<T, LinkedList<T>> {
      @Override
      public LinkedList<T> create() {
         return new LinkedList<T>();
}However, I would seriously question the use of such a factory. If you really have a need for a union of interfaces (I would suggest a design that requires/allows users to use your objects as Lists and Deques, something is seriously wrong), I would create such a union and use that in your contract. Java doesn't allow anonymous unions as you're trying to do, and using generics is just a hack. Here's what I might consider:
import java.util.Deque;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
public class GT21 {
   private interface ListDeque<T> extends List<T>, Deque<T> {}
   private interface MyInterface<T> {
      ListDeque<T> getListDeque();
   private static class MyClass<T> implements MyInterface<T>{
      @Override
      public ListDeque<T> getListDeque() {
         return new MyLinkedList<T>();
   private static class MyLinkedList<T> extends LinkedList<T>
      implements ListDeque<T> {
}

Loading datastore with multiple interfaces

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for