Loop changes notes

when i make a region loop , the notes in the looped parts are changed.
what the?

data-
the notes all became destructively transposed. very very wierd and I always have my fingers crossed that it doesn't happen again.
It was my first go at version7 and I had the transpose master track visible.
There were automation lines in the transpose track.
But I'm still suprised it was destructively applied.

Similar Messages

Sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loop

sir i have given lot of effort but i am not able to solve my problem either with notifiers or with occurence fn,probably i do not know how to use these synchronisation tools.

sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loopHi Sam,
I want to pass along a couple of tips that will get you more and better response on this list.
1) There is an un-written rule that says more "stars" is better than just one star. Giving a one star rating will probably eliminate that responder from individuals that are willing to anser your question.
2) If someone gives you an answer that meets your needs, reply to that answer and say that it worked.
3) If someone suggests that you look at an example, DO IT! LV comes with a wonderful set of examples that demonstate almost all of the core functionality of LV. Familiarity with all of the LV examples will get you through about 80% of the Certified LabVIEW Developer exam.
4) If you have a question first search the examples for something tha
t may help you. If you can not find an example that is exactly what you want, find one that is close and post a question along the lines of "I want to do something similar to example X, how can I modify it to do Y".
5) Some of the greatest LabVIEW minds offer there services and advice for free on this exchange. If you treat them good, they can get you through almost every challenge that can be encountered in LV.
6) If English is not your native language, post your question in the language you favor. There is probably someone around that can help. "We're big, we're bad, we're international!"
Trying to help,
Welcome to the forum!
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Using third part loops in Logic : bpm changes not following by the loop

i use lots of third part loops. with other audio soft when i choose a loop and drag/drop it to my project, the loop follow every change of the project (for exemple changing the bpm). In logic, when i do so, the loop do not follow project changes such as bpm.
Someone do knows how to fix my problem ?

I just found that you can drag/drop your third part loops from the Finder window where they are to the "Media/loops library" in Logic. By this way Logic recignize your loop as apple loop. But it works for apple loop third part loop and not for wav third part loop. For those you have to transform them by the "Apple loops utility" given with Logic. It's a bit long with big loops database but it's the first way I found.
If someone know a quicky way, I'm interested

LabVIEW 6.1 If For Loop count terminal is zero then value going through the loop is not passed on to the output of the loop

Hello, one of our customers just encountered an execution error in a vi running under LabVIEW 6.1, which doesn't exist under LabVIEW 5.1 or 6.01. I have a simple vi that has two encapsulated For Loops. Two string arrays go in, one goes out of the outer loop. Inside the outer loop the first array is indexed. The string which results from this indexing is compared with all other strings from the second string array in the inner loop. If it matches one of the strings of the second array, it is not outputted, otherwise this string goes through the inner For Loop to the output of the inner loop and from there to the output of the outer loop. The count
terminal of the outer/inner loop is connected to the Array Size of the first/second string array. If the second array is empty, that means that the element in test from the first arry cannot match anything from the second array, so the element in test is send to the output of the inner loop and from there to the output of the outer loop. This works fine in LabVIEW 5.1 and 6.01, but NOT in LabVIEW 6.1. In LabVIEW 6.1 the inner loop is never executed if the count value is zero (which is correct), but the data line running through the loop is not executed either, which is different to what LabVIEW 5.1 and 6.01 do. There, the input string is sent to the output of the inner loop correctly even if the loop counter is zero. The solution is easy - I just have to connect the output of the outer loop to the data line BEFORE it enters the inner loop. But: I don't know if this is a LabVIEW 6.1 bug or if it is supposed to be a feature, but it brings some incompatibility in programming between the
different LabVIEW versions.
Best regards,
Gabsi

Hi,
When a for-loop runs zero times, all outputs are 'undefined' (and should
be).
Besides, how would LV know what the output of a not executed routine should
be?
It might be handled differently in LV5 and LV6, which is unfortunate. In
both cases, the result is undefined.
It's not a bug. It's just something that should be avoided in any LV
version.
> The solution is easy - I just have to connect the
> output of the outer loop to the data line BEFORE it enters the inner
> loop. But: I don't know if this is a LabVIEW 6.1 bug or if it is
In some cases this does the trick. But if the data is changed in the inner
loop, this will effect the results if the N is not zero.
Technically, I think the output in this construction is also 'undefined'.
But LV handles this as expected / desired.
Another solution is to use a shift register. If N is zero, the input is
directly passed through to the output.
Regards,
Wiebe.
"Gabs" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> LabVIEW 6.1 If For Loop count terminal is zero then value going
> through the loop is not passed on to the output of the loop
>
> Hello, one of our customers just encountered an execution error in a
> vi running under LabVIEW 6.1, which doesn't exist under LabVIEW 5.1 or
> 6.01. I have a simple vi that has two encapsulated For Loops. Two
> string arrays go in, one goes out of the outer loop. Inside the outer
> loop the first array is indexed. The string which results from this
> indexing is compared with all other strings from the second string
> array in the inner loop. If it matches one of the strings of the
> second array, it is not outputted, otherwise this string goes through
> the inner For Loop to the output of the inner loop and from there to
> the output of the outer loop. The count terminal of the outer/inner
> loop is connected to the Array Size of the first/second string array.
> If the second array is empty, that means that the element in test from
> the first arry cannot match anything from the second array, so the
> element in test is send to the output of the inner loop and from there
> to the output of the outer loop. This works fine in LabVIEW 5.1 and
> 6.01, but NOT in LabVIEW 6.1. In LabVIEW 6.1 the inner loop is never
> executed if the count value is zero (which is correct), but the data
> line running through the loop is not executed either, which is
> different to what LabVIEW 5.1 and 6.01 do. There, the input string is
> sent to the output of the inner loop correctly even if the loop
> counter is zero. The solution is easy - I just have to connect the
> output of the outer loop to the data line BEFORE it enters the inner
> loop. But: I don't know if this is a LabVIEW 6.1 bug or if it is
> supposed to be a feature, but it brings some incompatibility in
> programming between the different LabVIEW versions.
> Best regards,
> Gabsi

Whay FORALL loop is not Working.....

hi Guys,
I have created a procedure with Object as Argument.......
CREATE OR Replace PROCEDURE Object_Student1(p student_detail1)
AS
BEGIN
FORi in p.first .. p.last loop
INSERT INTO Sample_mix VALUES (p(i));
end loop;
COMMIT;
END Object_Student1;
This above was not working..........After I have changed the PL/SQL in the INSERT statement....
CREATE OR Replace PROCEDURE Object_Student1(p student_detail1)
AS
BEGIN
FOR i in p.first .. p.last loop
INSERT INTO Sample_mix VALUES (p(i).roll,P(i).SALARY,P(i).ADDRESS,P(i).Name,P(i).mobile);
end Loop;
COMMIT;
END Object_Student1;
now This is Running Successfully.... But After I changed From FOR Loop TO FORALL loop..
CREATE OR Replace PROCEDURE Object_Student1(p student_detail1)
AS
BEGIN
FORALL i in p.first .. p.last
INSERT INTO Sample_mix VALUES (p(i).roll,P(i).SALARY,P(i).ADDRESS,P(i).Name,P(i).mobile);
COMMIT;
END Object_Student1;
The Above Code is Not working..... giving the folloing ERRORS...
LINE/COL ERROR
5/32 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/42 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/54 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/67 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
LINE/COL ERROR
Could anybody tell me why should This ForALL loop is not Working....??

Yes Suresgh I tried.... But I got Same Error..... given below...
1 CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE ObjectPassing2(p student_detail1)
2 AS
3 BEGIN
4 FORALL i in 1 .. p.Count
5 INSERT INTO Sample_mix VALUES(p(i).Roll,p(i).Salary,p(i).Address,p(i).Name,p(i).Mobile);
6 COMMIT;
7* END ObjectPassing2;
SQL> /
Warning: Procedure created with compilation errors.
SQL> sho err;
Errors for PROCEDURE OBJECTPASSING2:
LINE/COL ERROR
5/33 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/43 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/55 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
5/68 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records
LINE/COL ERROR
5/78 PLS-00436: implementation restriction: cannot reference fields of
BULK In-BIND table of records

How do I copy just the main region of a looped region & not the loops?

How do I copy just the main region of a looped region & not the looped bits?
Sometimes on the last iteration of a loop, I want to make a slight change in the notes, and therefore need to insert and actual copy. When I copy the original region and paste it, it overwrites everything that follows...deleting a whole bunch of arranging that I just did. Is there a command to copy only the original region? Otherwise I have to unloop the region, copy, insert, and reloop the region. Thanks

Either you have a lot of Pages breaks which you can delete or you have aded a Pages break which you also can delete. Turn on the invisible characters View > Show Invisibles. You will see blue characters.

6/8 Beta Monkey loops do not show up in loop browser

I installed the loops, created new song in 6/8 time, but they will not show up in the loop browser. I can drag the actual file in and that worked, but I would like it to work as it is supposed to

I followed the instructions here to reindex the loops:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107977
However after that, all the loops were not showing (mainly from the Voices Jam Pack). In the Finder, I see ones called "Nathan Improv" 01-14. However in the Garageband loop browser, I only see 01, 02, 04, 05, 10, 11, and 12. Out of the 1500 loops, it's only showing 429 under all effects.
Finally found another link: http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/GBFAQ.html#noloops
which had a blurb about missing loops:
+Also note that loops in a different time signature than your song, will not be displayed. Additionally, by default, the loop browser only displays loops within two semitones of the key of your project. Turning off "Keyword Browsing" in GB's prefs will allow all loops to be displayed regardless of key (the time signature requirement still applies).+
I turned off Keyword Browsing and was able to see all the loops in Voices that I wasn't able to see before.

Loops will not show up in browser

Im new to Garageband..still, I keep getting a message that no apple loops are installed even though I know they are. I have even installed a Jampack and another set of ProSessions loops. When I try dragging the folders into the broswer, they still do not show..what am I doing wrong?

I followed the instructions here to reindex the loops:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107977
However after that, all the loops were not showing (mainly from the Voices Jam Pack). In the Finder, I see ones called "Nathan Improv" 01-14. However in the Garageband loop browser, I only see 01, 02, 04, 05, 10, 11, and 12. Out of the 1500 loops, it's only showing 429 under all effects.
Finally found another link: http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/GBFAQ.html#noloops
which had a blurb about missing loops:
+Also note that loops in a different time signature than your song, will not be displayed. Additionally, by default, the loop browser only displays loops within two semitones of the key of your project. Turning off "Keyword Browsing" in GB's prefs will allow all loops to be displayed regardless of key (the time signature requirement still applies).+
I turned off Keyword Browsing and was able to see all the loops in Voices that I wasn't able to see before.

Email address change not showing on ipad after sync

iTunes email address change not showing on ipad after sync

So change it.
Open iTunes, scroll to the bottom of the main page, tap your account name, log out then sign in with the correct name.

Issue with posting change note processing using movement type 309

while processing Posting change note using transaction LT05, i am getting error 'Available quantity is less than selected quantity'. we need the quantity in posting change note to be picked from same storage bin from where it has been picked during transfer posting using 309. currently, it is showing all storage bins in ascending order for selection while Posting change note posting.
if we reqwhile mass porcessing of Posting change note using LSMW, it pickes the 1st storage bin. if 1st storage bin quantity is less than selected quantity of PCN then it is showing above error.

Hi Vishal,
The materials are managed by batch? Please check the batches of the material in the different storage bins. SAP asign the storage bin taking into account the material batch number and the oldest quant.
When the storage bin is not indicated, SAP looks at the batch number, and goes to the storage bin where this batch for the material is allocated. If SAP find more than one storage bin, SAP consumes from the batch that has the oldest quant.
I really dont understand deeply your question.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Enzo

Changes not being published

I'm having trouble with my changes not being saved/published.
I can choose to edit a page, click publish... it then shows the
page (in contribute) with my changes. But, when I go to the actual
website, the changes are not there... and when I go back to
contribute and move around in contribute's view of my website and
go back again to the page I was working on.. the changes are no
longer there.
thoughts? Should I uninstall and re-install
contribute?

No, don't uninstall...
First, emty the cache of you Internet Explorer and see if you
can see the changes then.
1. Main menu in IE, go to Extra>(internet)Options
2. go to Browsing History
3. click Remove... (delete/empty, I don't know the text of
the btn in english version) and emty your cache.
Second, change the settings of IE.
1. Main menu in IE, go to Extra>(internet)Options
2. go to Browsing History
3. click Preferences (next to Remove.. btn mentioned above)
4. change the setting for Temporary Internet files so that
the pages refresh everytime you visit the pages.

FOR LOOP EXCEPTION not working !!! please help

Hi,
Why is the NO_DATA_FOUND execption not getting executed. ????
Hereis the code....
CURSOR newreccur IS
SELECT * from emp_table;
BEGIN
v_file_handle := UTL_FILE.FOPEN('out','new.dat','W');
BEGIN
FOR emp_rec IN newreccur LOOP
-- Write procurement records
UTL_FILE.PUT(v_file_handle,'emp_rec.num');
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
dbms_output.put_line ('No data found ')
END;
EXCEPTION
WHEN UTL_FILE.INVALID_PATH
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ( 'Invalid Path ' || TO_CHAR (SQLCODE) );
UTL_FILE.FCLOSE_ALL;
END;

cursor for loops do not raise no_DatA_found - they simply stop looping when they run out of data. you can set a variable within the loop, and then check it after the loop if you need to know if data was returned or not.

Fiscal year change not yet made for company code

1. We have opened new company and enter data from FY 2009. All posting has happened properly, but when we are trying to see report S_ALR_87011963 we are facing following problem.
We have already check everything on SDN and followed, but our problem still exists.
Table T093C is showing as FY 2009 year and also same in OB52, OAAQ is showing 2008 as closed year. We have run AJRW for 2009 and it runs successfully.
error -
Fiscal year change not yet made for company code ABCD
Message no. AB059
Diagnosis
You have not yet carried out a fiscal year change for company code ABCD, although the current system date is in the new fiscal year.
Procedure
Carry out the fiscal year change for company code ABCD.
2. We are running AFAB in any mode we get following error.
Only an unplanned posting run is possible in this fiscal year.
Message no. AA693
Diagnosis
You have already posted in fiscal years that come after 2009. This means that you can only post in the last posting period 012 in fiscal year 2009. Or you can post to a special period, if one is set up. Since you have not posted yet in this fiscal year, you must specify that the depreciation posting run is unplanned.
Procedure
Please check the fiscal year entered. If you are certain you want to post to fiscal year 012, you must start the depreciation posting run in the last posting period (or in the special period). Be sure to indicate that this posting run is unplanned, since it falls outside of the normal posting cycle.

Hi Experts,
I am not making a new post regarding this but I hope you can help me answer.
I am experiencing the same issue as the one posted originally and here are my data.
1. Running the same asset report
2. System is currently in FY 2013
3. OAAQ shows FY 2012
4. SE16N > T03C shows FY2013
I have tried running AJRW again but I am getting the same error in the asset report. I hope someone out there can help.
Thanks,
Josef

Fiscal year change not yet made for company 1234

While executing the T-code S_ALR_87011963 (Asset balances report) reporting year : 31.12.2009, am
getting the below error u201CFiscal year change not yet made for company
code 1234u201D
1)      In T-code OAAQ, For company code 1234 closed fiscal year is 2008.
2)      Thru F-90, I can post the acquisitions in year 2009.
3)      Fiscal year 2009 is already opened, while running the reports why
this error message is showing u201CFiscal year change not yet made for
company code 1234u201D
4)      I have to get the reports for closed fiscal years, am not getting
any reports for fiscal years 2006,2007,2008.
Please post your comments.
Thanks,
vinay

Hi,
Please give me below mentioned details.
1) What is the year showing in OAAQ ?
2) Which year you have opened in AJRW ?
Best Regards,
Madhu

Mountain lion has killed my mac book pro. After downloading and trying to install, I am stuck in a loop of "not enough room to install on this disk" and not being able to access the old disk's data to open up space.

Mountain lion has killed my mac book pro. After downloading and trying to install, I am stuck in a loop of "not enough room to install on this disk" and not being able to access the old disk's data to open up space.

Nope. It just opened the installer and stayed in the same loop.
It tells me to choose a startup disk but the only option is the HD which it will not use because it says it cannot gather enough information.
Eveything was working fine until the mountain lion failed install.

Loop changes notes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for