LOV in Filter ??

Jdeveloper Version is - 11.1.1.4.0
How can I have an LOV in a filter facet. I know the solution for putting a Choice list. But here what i require is an LOV with an editable combo box option
Edited by: 966247 on Oct 18, 2012 10:10 PM

Thank you for the reply. The solution is
Drag and drop <af:inputComboBoxListOfValues> into the filter facet.
Set value = "#{vs.filtercriteria.Colum}"
Now go to bindings and add listofvalues binding. Select the base data source, Base Data Source Attribute and serverList Binding Name
set model property of <af:inputComboBoxListOfValues> "{bindings.LovField.listOfValuesModel}"
Save and Run

Similar Messages

No LOV in Filter

Hi
I have created a new Generic Loader interface that uses an AME lct file. This has been done by creating function, menu, grants and finally registering in iSetup.
I have a couple of Name-Value pair parameters i want to use (i.e. APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME) and have set them up as per the guides. However, when I add my interface to a selection set and click on Filter I have no LOV, simply the field name and a % symbol - not enterable.
Any ideas please?

Hello oscar,
Thanks for the response.
Report Level:
I run the report fine, but the column with the object is balnk(all other data is there). I only put the filter to see if this object had any values, my result was that when I put the filter it showed (no values) listed in the selection box.
Query Level:
Then I went to the edit query view and put the same object that I placed in the report level in the filter pane. In this view I am able to see a List of Values(1,2,3,4).
Next I try to run the query again, and I get that pop-up, I click ok and the report is now completely blank. It is only showing the headers of the report, but no data. All I did was put that filter in. If I take that filter out, the report looks like it did when i initially ran the report.
...if theres the message theres no data for query 1 means that theres no data a...nothing..
Why is there data in the query when I initially run the report? This report only has one query.
Hope this is more clear.
Thanks,
Niraj

Are cascading LOVs possible in af:query?

Is it possible to have two or more cascading LOVs in an af:query area based on a view criteria?
I'm having some trouble with dependant (child) LOVs: they filter correctly but return nothing to the field from which were launched.
I can attach a code snippet if necessary
Thanks
JDeveloper 11.1.1.3.0 with ADF BC
Anybody has ever tried it?
Edited by: Marge on 02-sep-2010 23:17

Is it possible to have two or more cascading LOVs in an af:query area based on a view criteria?Yes, it is possible
There might be something wrong in the configuration, Can you upload the sample app so that it will be easy to figure out the issue.
Sireesha

FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY & List_values(restrict)

I have a view which retrieves around 400,000 records from
various tables.
I had to use two LOV's for allowing to query by not entering any
values as well as partial values.
Since List_Values(Restirct) and FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY options do
go well together. I am using two LOVs for both of them.
When I call the LOV with FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY, it retrieves the
records faster ie 5 secs.
When I call the LOV without FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY, using
List_values(RESTRICT), then it takes around 30 secs.
Any ideas about the difference in these two options?

Hi,
I might be mistaken (too many forms versions in my brain) but
Filter Before Display ignores the contents of the output item. It
shows a small window, where you can enter a filter before
fetching all records to the LOV.
LOV_VALUES(restrict); (if I remember correctly from my
SQL*Forms30 days) actually used the contents of the item as a
filter (for instance, if the item contains "a", the LOV only
shows the records that start with "a").
I've never tried to use both in the same LOV.
I'll try it tomorrow.
Hope this clears something,
Pedro das Neves
[email protected]

LOV Find Problem

I'm a newbie, so bear with me. I created a form with a couple of LOVs. One is for looking up employees by full_name. When the LOV pops up I do a search on Ar% and I am returned all the employees with names starting with Ar. Now, if I don't choose anything and just change my search criteria, to say Br% and click the find button, nothing happens. The find button is greyed out. If I go back and put in the original search criteria again, it works fine. So, no matter what the search criteria, only the first search works. I have to close the LOV and start again to change the search. Is this normal behavior or am I doing something wrong?
Here are my LOV property settings:
Under the General section:
Subclass Information: LOV
Under the Functional section:
List Type: Record Group
Record Group: EMPLOYEE_RG
Column mappings are setup.
Filter before Display: Yes
Automatic Display: No
All of the rest of the Automatic properties are set to Yes.
I have another LOV for returning data from a small table and I have all the Functional section properties the same except for Filter Before Display, which is set to No. I don't have the problem with this LOV.
However, I've looked at some standard Oracle forms that have LOVs setup the same as my Employee LOV with Filter Before Display being set to Yes and they don't seem to have this problem. So, I'm scratching my head as to what could be causing this. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

I'm using Form Builder version 6.0.8.26.0
Internet Explorer version 6.0.2900.2180
Operating system is XP Professional.

Dependent LOV against poplist

Hi,
I have created an attribute of style messageChoice and another one of message LovInput. In the LOV mappings for the second one I have added new mapping say 'lovCriteria' and set the Criteria Item as poplist item.
In the LOV region, I have created a formValue which is mapped to an attribute in the LOVVO instance which holds the same value as POPLIST.
The Dependency validation is working fine like when try to click on LOV it says 'Poplist column must be selected.' but when I made the selection from POPLIST the LOV is not filtering accordingly. It shows the entire list.
Any Advise what else I was missing? Thanks for the help.

Hi Mukul,
Yes I did, I think this is the only way to pass the dependent value to LOV to filter the data. The details are
In the LOVVO I have columns A, B, C
In the LOVRN I have A (messageStyledText), B (messageStyledText) and C (messageStyledText) are mapped (i.e. View Instance to LOVVO and View Attributes are A, B and C (messageStyledText) respectively. A, B are 'Search Allowed' set to True.
In the queryPG I have 2 attributes Q1 and Q2 where Q1 is a POPLIST item and Q2 is a LOV item and Q3.
In the queryPG for Q2 I have 3 LOV mappings
1 q3 - mapped to
2 q2 - mapped to B
3 q1 - mapped to C which is criteria item.
Criteria item Properties set to Q1 and LOV region set to C (i.e. I would like to filter the LOV by Q1 in the qeuryPG which is equal to column 'C' in the LOV.
Also I have set the properties 'Required' is 'True' and 'Programatic Query' to 'True'.
I think this is all we need to do for dependent LOV. Or am I missing something?
When I try to access the LOV on Q2 it displays OA default error message, I must enter Q1 i.e. the dependency part is working fine.
But when I select the value for Q1 and go to LOV and hit go button it is not filtering the data for the value in Q1.
It displays the entire list.
Let me know if I miss something. In Dev guide they explained to create a 'formValue'. My question is the criteria Item should be mapped to a form value in the LOVRN or a 'messageStyledText' ?
Thanks for your help.

LOV Find field initialisiation

Is there a way of initialising the "Find" field in a LOV and causing the LOV to filter the list displayed by what the "Find" field has been set?

You can also use a seperate control field and reference the field in the LOV select statement. This can also be more efficient as the database applies the restriction whereas restrict functionality fetches the whole list from the database before restricting it locally.

Pass textbox-value to popup LOV

Hi,
I have a textbox with a popup-LOV.
Now I was wondering if it is possible to pass the text, which is written in the textbox (the returning-value textbox - not the textbox at the top of the LOV), to the popup-LOV and filter this LOV by using this text?
I know that it is possible to search by using the textbox at the top of the LOV, but it would be more userfriendly if both ways are possible.
Thanks so much,
Elisabeth

Hi,
I tired Benz' way and it works - sometimes. I think there is a problem with the refresh of the Textbox.
I typed in a value and klicked on the popup-button. Than the whole list occurs. After trying several times (I think in between the textbox kept the value) it worked - so the popup-list was already filtered.
Now if I want to search for another value, it still keeps the value from before.
Is this a 'normal' cache-"problem"?
LISA

How we use the rights on LOV

Hi,
How we use the rights on LOV to filter.

What you need to do is to edit the LOV sql (assuming it is custom folder) and insert there some
kind of security mechanism.
Also you can create dependencies in the parameters so that if you will select on the "Region" parameter the value of "New York" when opening the values for "Departments" you will get only the relevant departments.
This can be done in the parameters definition, you can choose there to limit the results according to another condition. (note that it might create some performance issues)
Tamir

Is there a way to show only flagged email on iOS Mail?

I use Exchange 2007 at work with Outlook 2010. I also use my iPad to connect to my company Outlook Web Access. On the iPad I am able to mark a message as flagged. I use the flag on a message to indicate that there's some action that I need to take on the email. After I skim my inbox and flag all the emails with actionable items in them I go to my smart folder in Outlook which shows only my flagged messages so I can focus on those with actionable items. I noticed on IOS Mail there does not seem to be such smart folders and there seems to be no way to view only messages which are flagged.
Can someone please explain how to do this on the iPad. It is very important to me. In fact, it's so important, that I would switch to Windows Phone platform just to have this one feature.
Thanks!

I too would love to filter my inbox down to just flagged emails - I'm on iPad 3 with latest iOS, though it seems latest OS is not the problem, but rather a simple oversight in usability, and more important productivity.
On the note of productivity, why does it take SO MANY clicks to flag an email on iPad mail? Have to hit Edit > mark the email > Mark > Flag. I count three superfluous taps there. There should be a swipe action on the left (much like the swipe and Delete on the right hand side of the email heading) for flagging. And a simple little flag symbol at the top to hit when I want to see only flagged mails. Productivity should be the name of the game.
I also realise that venting in this forum probably isn't the best place for it...

Search Item drop-down does not show any data for Advanced Search.

Hi,
I have a requirement to add a new criteria to the existing Advanced Search region of 'My Employee Information' in Manager Self Service responsibility. I substituted the AdvancedSearchVO to include the new column. Using personalization i did the below steps to show the new column in the page,
1) Created a 'Message Styled Text' item under Table Layout region to display the result. I associated the View Instance (AdvancedSearchVO1) and View Attribute (AttrColumn).
2) In Advanced Search Panel created a new CriteriaRow and set the 'Search Allowed' property to True.
3) In Advanced Search Mappings i tried to create the new mapping but the Search Item drop-down does not show any of the CriteriaRow item. But Results Item shows the 'Message Styled Text' item created in step 1 above.
Any idea what i would be missing becasue of which 'Search Item' property does not show any data?
I am using OAF version 12.1.1.
Thanks, Suresh

Hi,
I faced the same situation but i still waiting for the solution.. this is my problem's thread..
Addition of LOV Search Filter using Personalization
But when i tried to create a new custom page with advanced table and created a new LOV column via personalization. i was able to create new search mapping.. but this is not happening in the seeded page case :(.
I m also looking for solution...if any one can provide some inputs on it , will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Renu

Creating a seamless background

Hi!
I have migrated over to a mac computer and am at a bit of loss. On my PC I used simple filters to create a lovely seamless background tile... but on the Mac I can't find an equivalent filter/plugin that will do the same thing.
Can someone help me out on the steps that would be require to do this and/or a plugin that would work? I'd like to use these for web backgrounds.
I did try searching the forum but couldn't really find anything.
Thanks!

Barbara thanks for the reply. I was/am using Elements V6 with Simple Filter Quick Tile installed (Love that filter) but with the new computer I am using Elements but the filter is Windows only. I was just trying to see if anyone new of any other filter/plugin available for Elements/Mac that did the same thing.
Thank you also for the list...I did browse through that the other day. I have googled (is that a word?) but I wasn't finding anything, so thought I'd stop in here and see if someone knew something that I wasn't finding while googling! :)

ORA-00904 when use column alias in Record Group Query

Is it possible to use column aliases in Record Group Queries?
I have a query that runs fine in SQL*Developer, but gives me runtime errors when I use it as a Record Group Query.
When I use it as a Record Group Query, the Form compiles, but at runtime I receive the following errors:
FRM-40502: ORACLE error: unable to read list of values
when I use Help - Display Error, I see:
ORA-00904:"CHILDNAME":invalid identifier
The query is something like this
select decode(complex stuff here) as "childname" ....
I've tried it with and without the double quotes surrounding the alias name, and have also tried it without using the "as" keyword.
I would appreciate any suggestions or insights. I'm using Forms 9.0.4.
Thanks.

It looks like this is caused by bug 725059:
"FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY" DOESN'T WORK IF LOV HAS COLUMN ALIASES (TRIAGE1098)
My LOV does have the Filter Before Display turned on. Here's the text of the bug:
IF an LOV is created with column aliases in the select statement, (eg: select ename emp_name from emp) and the LOV property "Filter Before Display" is "Yes", THEN when you attempt to filter the LOV at runtime, (eg: type '%' then press the 'Find' button) the internal WHERE clause that forms sends to the database is: WHERE column_alias LIKE '%%' This is incorrect syntax. A client-side sqlnet trace shows this. The correct syntax should be: WHERE column LIKE '%%' . The incorrect syntax results in no rows returned. However no error is displayed by forms to the user.

Custom Search Form and custom attribute picklist?

I have a custom item type which has a custom attribute NAICS_Code. The NAICS codes are stored in a database table and the attribute is set to a list of values that is a query on that table. The attribute is associated with a custom item type as a text attribute.
Now, when I add the custom item type to a page, the NAICS Code field is a popup selector, as expected.
On a Portal page, I have the Custom Search Portlet that searches another page that contains the custom item type.
On the Custom Search Portlet, I can add the NAICS Code as an additional attribute, but the search field is a plain text box and NOT a pick list of any kind.
Can I configure the Custom Search Portlet to use associated LOVs with filter by attributes?

I'm afraid that in the version of portal you are using we don't render LOVs for LOV attributes on the search portlet.
In 10.1.2 attributes are added to the search form using a More Attributes button which simply render an empty row for the attribute details to be filled in.
In 10.1.4 this was improved considerably. Now attributes are added to the search form like they are added in the edit defaults, with a Choose Attributes link which opens a popup to select the attributes. On closing the popup the search form is re-rendered and any LOV attributes will be rendered with a combo box of available values to select from.

Cached Parameter Dynamic Values

I hope someone in this forum can help out. I created a report that depends on the database values of a field and it seems to be getting cached.
When I query the database the values are there, when I run the report the values are read correctly, it just seems like the values are saved in the parameter? The dynamic field also creates many results and I would love to filter the results if at all possible by another field. I know you can do it, but it would have to work with crystalreports.com as well.
Thanks

I paid the couple hundred bucks and got some help.
There is a limitation at 1000 records and to get around it you need to edit your registry:
HIKEY_CURRENT_USER >>Software>>Business Objects>>Suite12.0>>Database Options>>LOV
create
MaxRowsetRecords value:#(I set it to 2000)
This allowed me to query on my local machine the additional records.
This will not work on crystalreports.com. I created some custom tables to pull the specific records instead of all my records, imported the records into the new table and then created some APEX code to update the table whenever a new record was created that fit what I needed for reporting.
An idea would be to allow us an opportunity to filter the parameter values vs dumping the whole table into these picklists. It's not the sexiest fix, but it is a fix.
Thank you to all who tried to help. I tried to not do it this way, but it looks like the only solution.
Edited by: egoehring on Mar 30, 2011 1:29 AM

LOV in Filter ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for