LR dt to be taken as BiIlling dt instead of Actual Goods issue dt

Hi
The normal Business practice is the system takes the actual goods issue date mentioned in the delivery document as the billing date and accordingly ,the payment terms or credit days given to the customer starts from this date.
Now the requirement is
The payment terms has to be with ref to LR (lorry receipt ) date and not on Actual goods issue date, for example: If the Actual goods issue date is 15th April & the LR date is 17th april then the customers credit days has to start from 17th and not from 15th april .
Because ,in real time we do not know when the transporter will pick and deliver the goods to the customer,so if the transit time is 2 days ,then customer would be loosing the ,2 credit days and the invoice would be due on the 7th day ,where as the customer would have received the stock 5 days back and not 7days back.(if the terms of payment is say 7 days)
can any one suggest how to addresse this scenario apart from the following
1) Define the terms of payment as longer by 2days
2) Give the actual goods issue date as 2days in advance
shashi

Hi TricaC,
I'm sorry to see your friend is having problems with his BT Broadband. Please use the 'contact the mods' link in my forum profile to send in his details and we'll be happy to help. You can find the link by clicking on my username.
Thanks
Neil
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Similar Messages

Does PSE13 download photos in the order they are taken on that date and show actual time when hovering over the photo as it did in PSE6?

In my work, I need to be able to look at photos I took throughout the day at various locations and group them by the time I was there on that date to distinguish the different properties I am taking photos of. In my previous version of PSE6, when the day's pictures were downloaded, they were downloaded to the computer in the order I took them, and if you hovered over the picture it would show the time the photo was taken. I just need a program that will organize in that fashion. I do not need a lot of editing options, more the organizational options.

Hi,
If you are happy with PSE 6, why not continue to use it?
PSE 13 can display the images in date/time order like PSE 6 does. The time doesn't appear when you hover over a thumbnail but can be displayed below the thumbnail. The best thing is for you to download the trial version (select version 13 from the following link) and try it for 30 days to see if you like it.
Download Photoshop Elements products | 13, 12, 11, 10
If you use the trial, to see the date and time under each thumbnail you need to go to the View menu in the organizer and ensure that Details is checked.
Brian

Why doesn't Lightroom organise videos/photos lacking "date taken" by "date modified" instead of "date created"?

This still seems to be a problem with Lightroom 5. This post is one of the top results after trying to Google this problem, and it's for LR3. I can't understand why something so fundamental to video (and some photo) organisation has been overlooked for so long.
I've been trying to import and organise all my old photos and videos by date with LR5. They've been backed up and copied many times over the years, most recently to an external drive last week. So every file has a "date created" of last week. But "date modified" remains the original recorded date.
This doesn't matter for photos with a proper EXIF "date taken" - but LR5 looks at the "date created" for videos, making it completely useless for organising them into date-based folders. It puts videos I recorded in 2010 (as per "date modified") into a 2014-12 folder. Why.
It's not just a video problem - some photos I took with devices that didn't record EXIF "date taken" are also filed into folders from this month, even though the "date modified" on them is correct as being from 5 years ago.
How can I rely on LR5 for importing and date-based organisation when it relies on files (lacking "date taken") having never been copied or backed up?

Hello,
I use exiftool to modify the Creation and Modification time of the files. After that I use LR "Ajust time" feature to set the time of the movies in LR to the file creation time (last point). This works fine for me.
For MOV (Quicktime):
exiftool "-FileModifyDate<TrackCreateDate" "-FileCreateDate<TrackCreateDate"
For AVI:
exiftool "-FileModifyDate<DateTimeOriginal" "-FileCreateDate<DateTimeOriginal" *.avi
Depnding on your camera (and container format mov, avi) you may also ajust the time zone, e.g.
exiftool -FileModifyDate+=1 -FileCreateDate+=1 -if "$CameraModelName =~ /EOS 600D/i" *.mov
Which time in the container (MOV, AVI) you use as source, depends on your workflow. I edit my mov files before import. Therfore "CreateDate" is the time when I edited the file. Quicktime and (some) avi file contain a time when the containing stream was created. I use this vaule as source.
exiftool <filename> gives you detailed information about all available times.

My purchases are being taken off credit card instead of my iTunes credit...why ?? How do I stop this as I have £15 iTunes credit

I have just redeemed my iTunes voucher so have £15 credit but when I purchased music it was taken from my credit card and not my available credit from iTunes! Having read other duscussions I understand all purchases should first be taken from all redeemed vouchers before credit card so why is this not the case with me? I thought maybe I should try to redeem the voucher again just to ensure I have the credit but understandably it says I have already redeemed. Please help.

Hi there,
You may find the article below helpful.
iTunes Store: How to redeem a code
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1574
-Griff W.

I have a problem with a previous purchase and sign in is required. However, the card is no longer in use and so no money can be billed from it. I need to add a new card so that the money can be taken from that card instead. It's from a different country

I have an Australian card associated with itunes and the App Store. However, I am no longer in Australia and I wish to change my country of residence and card to the UK/English. When I try to change country, it says there's a problem with a previous purchase, meaning I have no money on the Australian card and therefore the previous purchase cannot be billed.
The only way I can pay for the previous purchase is by adding an English card but it won't let me do this.
Does this mean I have to somehow put money on the old Australian card to pay for the previous purchase? Or is there a way I can transfer the bill to an English new card?
Cheers guys
Arron

You are right, but how could i send it to Apple? when the phone company first replaced my iphone they had in stock alots of iphones and they just sent mine back to Apple and gave me a new one, so all i did is to give them my phone, but now how could i sent it to Apple? and i cant send it by myself, and the store wont do that, its a lost for them.. so sending it to Apple wasnt an option from the begining.
and for the record, i dont think the store where i bought it is an authorized shop.. its just a store who boughts phone's from Apple in a low price and sells it in much more money..

Billing date(fkdat) in sales order item is not copied from Goods Issue Date

Hi All
we are facing problem at item level billing date field.This field should be filled with the GI Date in schedule lines shipping tab.
but, it(billing date) is not being filled with goods issue date but, with the required deliver date at sales order header.
Please give me a solution and the root cause. This is urgent as business is halted.
Thanks
Kumar

Lakshmipati
This is from SAP Screen
"If invoice dates are defined for the customer, the system proposes the billing date from the invoice date calendar. If no invoice dates are agreed, then the actual goods issue date is formed on the basis of delivery related billing. In order related billing, the billing date of the order forms the basis of the billing date."
earlier it is happening as desired.i.e., billing date=GI Date.
but, as of now it is taken from the required delivery date.
Please give me solution
Kumar

Issue in Delivery document Status update

Hi ,
We are facing serious issue in delivery document delta extraction via Delivery item Datasource (2LIS_12_VCITM). This leads to incorrect Pending logistic figures in stock and dispatch report. Details for the issue are as follows.
Datasource used : 2LIS_12_VCITM
Issue Description :
The goods movement status flag (WBSTA) field from the ECC table VBUP is not correctly extracted by the standard deliveries item datasource (2LIS_12_VCITM) during delta loads.
Steps taken to rectify the issue
-     We have removed the commit work statement and applied in parallel update task in ECC. Include : ZSD_INCL_DEL_SAVE_FINS
-     Setup tables for Delivery were filled in ECC.
-     Historic data was deleted from the Delivery cube in BW
-     Data was pulled into PSA (Info package u2013 Full Update) from where it was loaded to DSO in overwrite mode (Historic data was not deleted from DSO)
-     Data from DSO to delivery cube was loaded with DTP setting as Full Update.
-     After complete data was updated in Cube the DTP setting were changed to Delta.
-     Delta info package was scheduled for the capturing the document changes from next load.
-     Goods Movement status for all the documents created till this point was exactly similar to the status in ECC.
-     The goods movement status flag (WBSTA) field from the ECC table VBUP is not correctly extracted by the standard deliveries item datasource (2LIS_12_VCITM) during delta loads.
Example              :
                                Delivery document no: 2131260470 is pulled with goods movement status u201CAu201D in firstly load (here BW Delivery status matches
                                    With ECC )
                               Before next delta load status in ECC (WBSTA) changes to u201CCu201D (PGI Complete) along with updated u201CGoods Issue Dateu201D
                               Extractor fails to capture the change in document ,thus status in BW remains as u201CAu201D with no date updated in u201CGoods Issue Dateu201D
                                   field.
Steps for Reconstruction :
1)     Check the value of Goods movement status and actual goods issue date fields in the PSA for the datasource
2LIS_12_VCITM in BW for the sample delivery mentioned in the attached file
2)     Compare these values with the ones in the ECC table VBUP.
Kindly help at the earliest.
Regards,

Hi,
   Could anyone please reply as its quite critical.
many thanks in advance,
regards
pramod.

Decentralize warehouse management

Dear Friends,
This is the question related to warehouse management system.
My requirement is that we are going to set decentralize management. Presently we are having CWM in our present system. At another place there is local ERP , we want to replace it and need to go for decentralise WM there.
Then this decentralised WMS and my present WM willl communicate with each other.
Could you please let me know what will be it process ? Transaction cycles ? and its configuration?
Regrads,
Mahesh

Dear All ,
I got some information I am sharing with you and closing this ticket.
1) Process :
rocesses Between the SAP System as ERP System and as WM System
Purpose The variant for the SAP System as an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and as a Warehouse Management (WM) system describes the link-up of an external warehouse management system to an SAP System. The stand-alone system that executes all warehouse management functions is an SAP System. Prerequisites Two systems are involved in this scenario. The first system is an ERP system that performs inventory management, purchasing and sales tasks and distributes existing master data and movement data to the Warehouse Management system (WMS). The second system is a WMS that performs warehouse management tasks such as putaway/picking and goods receipt/goods issue and is responsible for carrying out the physical material transfers. Process and Data Flow General inventory postings: If the decentralized scenario is used, inventory postings are not directly processed in Inventory Management (IM). If a goods movement is created in IM, the system generates inbound or outbound deliveries and distributes them to the WMS. In the WMS, the goods are put away or picked based on the existing delivery. As a result of the goods movement posting in the WMS delivery, the system sends the completion verification to the ERP system and then uses the delivery to post the actual goods receipt or goods issue in inventory management. Deliveries with a purchase order or a sales order as a source document are handled in the same way. Goods receipts based on purchase orders: You use the ERP system to create purchase orders and send them to the vendors. To give notification of the delivery that is due, the vendor returns a shipping notification that is recorded in the ERP system as an inbound delivery. The inbound delivery is distributed to the WMS using a Business Application Programming Interface (BAPI). In the WM system, the inbound delivery is a request to put away or pick goods. When the vendor physically delivers the goods, a transfer order is generated in the WMS which is used to place the goods into stock. After the transfer order is confirmed, goods receipt is posted for the inbound delivery. This clears the interim storage bin. As a result, the completion confirmation is sent to the ERP system and the goods receipt is processed in inventory management. An inbound delivery based on a purchase order can be created in different ways, depending on the confirmation control key in purchasing. If the vendor usually sends a shipping notification, the inbound delivery is created when the shipping notification is recorded in the system. In all other cases, you have the option of creating inbound deliveries automatically using collective processing. Process for goods receipts based on a purchase order: Creating the purchase order in the ERP system Generating the inbound delivery (automatically/manually) Distributing the inbound delivery from the ERP system to the WM system using BAPI method "InboundDelivery.SaveReplica" (this process is automatically executed in the background) Physically receiving the goods into the warehouse (WMS) Creating the transfer order Putting the goods away Confirming the transfer order Posting goods receipt for the inbound delivery (as a result, a completion verification is sent to the ERP system using BAPI method "InboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral") Goods receipt for the inbound delivery is automatically posted in the ERP system (in inventory management) when the verification is recorded. Quality management in decentralized WMS using handling units (HUs) Quality management is also available in the goods receipt process in the decentralized warehouse. In this scenario, the quality management function is in the central system. If there are handling units in the inbound delivery for which an inspection lot has been created, the inspection lot number is copied into the decentralized WMS and stored in the quants there. The inspection lot does not exist in the decentralized system. You make the usage decision for the inspection lot in the central system, which triggers the system to create a posting change delivery and distribute it to the decentralized system. Then, the stock that belongs to this inspection lot is found in the warehouse and the corresponding posting change is made. From this point on, the procedure is the same as that of a posting change (see below). Other goods receipts: All other goods receipts are recorded in the ERP system. When the document is saved, the system creates an inbound delivery and sends it to the WM system using a BAPI. The inbound delivery is then processed in the WM system as described above. When the verification for the inbound delivery is sent to the ERP system, the goods receipt posting is automatically initiated in inventory management. Stock transfers: A stock transfer usually involves two storage locations (plants): the issuing storage location for picking and the receiving storage location for putaway. If the stock transfer is recorded in the ERP system as a two-step procedure and if one of the storage locations involved is a WMS-relevant storage location, the system creates a delivery for this posting and sends it to the WMS. Both storage locations involved are copied into the delivery to allow the actual posting to be executed after the verification is received from the WMS. One-step stock transfers using a WMS-relevant storage location are only possible if a storage location that is not WM-relevant is involved in the posting change. Process for stock transfers: Entering the goods movement in the system Automatically creating the delivery Distributing the delivery from the ERP system to the WM system using BAPI method "InboundDelivery.SaveReplica" (this process is automatically executed in the background) Physically receiving the goods into the warehouse or removing the goods from the warehouse (WMS). Creating the transfer order Putting away or picking the goods Confirming the transfer order Posting goods receipt for the inbound delivery (as a result, a completion verification is sent to the ERP system using BAPI method "InboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral") or posting goods issue for the outbound delivery (as a result, a completion verification is sent to the ERP system using BAPI method "OutboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral"). Goods receipt for the inbound delivery or goods issue for the outbound delivery is automatically posted in the ERP system (in inventory management) when the verification is recorded. When the goods receipt or goods issue is posted in the ERP system, the stock transfer is simultaneously posted in inventory management. Goods issues based on sales orders: The system uses sales orders to generate deliveries in the ERP system. The deliveries are then sent to the WMS. You use the WMS to create the transfer order, pick the goods and confirm the transfer order. When goods issue is posted, the picking quantities are passed on to the delivery of the ERP system. Process for goods issues based on deliveries: Creating the sales order Creating the outbound delivery Distributing the delivery to the WMS Creating the transfer order for outbound delivery Physically picking the goods in the warehouse Confirming the transfer order Printing the shipping documents, if appropriate Posting goods issue for the outbound delivery (as a result, a completion verification is sent to the ERP system using BAPI method "OutboundDelivery.ConfirmDecentral") Goods issue for the outbound delivery is automatically posted in the ERP system (in inventory management) when the completion confirmation is recorded. Posting changes You can also initiate transfer postings in the central system, in which case the stock change will be compared with the stock in the decentralized system and adjusted, if necessary. If you use inventory management to make posting changes in the central system, the system first generates a delivery. This delivery is technically a request for the decentralized system to make a transfer posting for the stock involved. The central system does not create material documents or make any changes in stock at this point. The delivery is transmitted to the decentralized system and, as of this point, can only be changed there. You can make settings in the decentralized system so that the system automatically creates a transfer order that corresponds to this delivery that does not require confirmation. You can also set the system to make the appropriate transfer posting in the WM stock automatically at the end of the process. The transfer posting in the decentralized system simultaneously verifies the appropriate quantities to the central system. When the central system receives this verification, it automatically makes the stock change and creates a material document. You can display the material document in the delivery’s document flow. Production supply If the decentralized warehouse is also responsible for production supply, the following two methods of material staging are available in the system: Production staging by switching storage locations Production stock is managed in a storage location that is located somewhere other than in the decentralized warehouse. In this case, the production storage location is not managed in the decentralized warehouse. If you switch the storage location in the central system, the system generates a delivery, for which you can then pick and post goods issue in the decentralized system. At this point, the stock that has been staged using this method can be used in a manufacturing order in the central system. Goods issue posting for a manufacturing order In this scenario, the raw materials are taken directly from the decentralized warehouse’s storage location and used in the manufacturing order. If goods issue is posted for the manufacturing order in the central system, the system creates a delivery that is sent to the decentralized system. The rest of the process is the same as regular goods issue processing. Note the following distinctions with regard to reservations: Delivery does not trigger request generation If the goods issue posting that generates the delivery refers to a reservation, the reservation number is copied into the delivery. In this case, the delivery does not check for availability and no requirements are generated, since that was already done in the manufacturing order. The reservation is canceled when the actual goods issue posting is made. Changes disappear after the delivery is distributed Keep in mind that if the reservation is changed in the meantime (if the production quantity has changed, for example), this change will not affect the delivery. Similarly, a change in the delivery will not result in a change in the reservation. The WM/PP interface, which you can use for production supply in an integrated system, is not supported for decentralized warehouse processing. This function is not available decentrally because the WM/PP interface is based on the assumption that WM and PP are running in the same system, which is not the case in a decentralized system. Goods receipt for a manufacturing order You can process goods receipts from manufacturing orders in the decentralized WM system. For goods receipt postings, the central system first creates an inbound delivery for the manufacturing order and distributes it to the decentralized system. In the decentralized system, the inbound delivery serves as a basis for putaway in WM. You can correct quantity differences here. Once you have confirmed the putaway transfer orders, goods receipt is posted in the decentralized system. The decentralized system then reports the quantity that was posted back to the central system. This verification automatically makes the actual goods receipt posting for the manufacturing order, along with the material document, in the central system.
2) Config we will get from Google also we will get standard idocs for ib and out bound.
Regards,
Mahesh

Date formats in BI Query designer

Hi gurus
We have enhanced our cube 0sd_co3 where we have taken a number of dates such as Railway Receipt date, Actual Goods Issue date, LFdat, thses are only few examples. Now our reporting scenerio demands reporting based on thses dates as given in our time dimensions such as
YYYYMM Qty
but not based on the date mapped in the time dimension in the cube. but based on these dates
in oracle we have the to_char function through which we change the format of date while writing sql query
so if there is any option of changing date format in query without changing the modelling
Pl suggest
Thanks
Shivani

Hi,
You can create new characteristic of char number 6 . Include it in the data target. Populate it via a update rule ( Routine).
Use input as standard date (Railway Receipt date) and then pass the value to the new char in the required format (YYYYMM). Follow same thing for other dates also.
Let me know if you have doubt.
Regards,
Viren

Regarding PM order reservation

hi all
My scenerio is i have created a maintenance order and attached some material , while issuing the goods for that order i have received partially only ( say reserved 2 and taken 1),,when iam again doing the goods issue only the remaining qty is propsed this is fine.But when i make the Goods reversal for order the qty withdran is not proposed .is there any setting to acheive this Also in the case of Refurbishment order if i have planned for 2 mtls and taken 1 material only when iam using IW8W the total qty is proposed.i want the system to porpse the qty which i have withdran only ( in my case 1 only).kindly specify the settings to be done
regards
thyagarajan

hi
check the order type configuration PR creation is available you have to select "Immediate" option.

Delivery re-scheduling

Hello,
I have few questions as follows:-
1) The sales order passes the requirements to MRP.If that is the case, then why the delivery (for same sales order ) also passes the requirement to MRP.
2) I could not understand the concept of res-scheduling of deliveries from help.sap.com. Can someone pls explain.
3) How can the planned goods issue date and actual goods issue date be different. if the stock is available but we if defer the PGI, don't you think that stock can be taken away by some other sales order/delivery ?
regards
pamela

1) If you don't pass, how SO knows you have delivered and also knock off requirements.
2) RE-ATP you mean? if delay shipment, stock post in late, changes in delivery date, will helps.
3) Delay in shipment is very common, or customer delivery date is not accurate or ATP date is not accurage.
Pick the OB and block it then.

This is a complaint is about being taken adavantage of.

I have been with Verizon since May of 2014 and I felt good at first about joining Verizon but at his point I am very disappointed in my experience so far. Every month has been a headache and I can not seem to see at all where the saving really are and especially since I have a government employee discount. I was told about every month "Oh you should see the savings in one to two billing cycles" what a joke! Every month since May I have had to increase my data so that I would not get charged for data overage which is $15.00. So now I am at 8GB and still no savings my bill has been over $100.00 every month since May. When I got my first bill In June I was charged $45.00 in data overage when the IT Support was supposed to have increased my data to avoid this overage and they did not. So If I had not been paying attention to my bill like I do every month Verizon was just going to take my money and say nothing about it. That's bad business they should have the knowledge in technology to catch a mistake on a bill and step up to credit a customer's account for Verizon's mistake. So here we are with the bill for August and Verizon has done it again by secretly adding charges to my account with out a explanation of why they are charging my account. My bill had a overage charge of $14.99 and a late fee of $1.50 which is $16.99 dollars of my money that they were just going to take for no reason. So I called and I was told that since July and August had 31 days that they moved my billing date back on day and Verizon failed to notify me of this action taking place and so that's why my bill was one day late. The lady I spoke with said "Oh we really should tell our customers when this happens so that they can be better prepared to pay their bill on time" now WHY is that so hard to do when Verizon will send you text after text for just about everything else. It's really a shame that I have to call Verizon every month about my bill and call them out on fees that should NOT be on my bill. I am sick and TIRED of doing that I just don't understand what the issue is with communication. My bill was fixed but I asked why was I charged a data overage charge when I clearly did not go over it said that to be true on my Verizon account. She said that " I was charged that because when you go out side of the data towers and use someone else's tower you get charged a NO BILLED DATA FEE" "So we have to wait for the other tower to send us your data usage off of their towers and then we add it to your bill. WHAT??? REALLY?? I have never heard that ever and she could not even tell me what tower and where so right there I know that is a lie and that because I did not go over they just wanted me to pay more money. See the way I figure it Verizon wants me to pay more because they feel what I pay is not enough since I get a discount and if that's the case they should not offer discounts period. Also it seems that at the last two weeks of every month I get a text saying that I have used 70% of my data text YES to get 2 more GB'S, and then the last week of the month close to my new billing date I get another text saying I have used 90% of my data. Well I think that is happening to force me to increase my data to pay them more money, that's not fair BAD BUSINESS. I will say that my service is excellent but customer service and the over all management of Verizon is TERRIBLE AND UNJUST. When my contract is up I will be leaving Verizon to never return because I work hard for my money and I will not just give it away to a bill that has fee's that I SHOULD NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR. If I know that I went over my data I am grown enough to pay for it with no questions asked because I know that it was my fault. I will continue to monitor my bill every month and keep a close eye on Verizon to prevent them from screwing me over on my bill. I'm tired of being taken advantage of.....

Your issue has been escalated to a Verizon agent. Before the agent can begin assisting you, they will need to collect further information from you.
Please go to your profile page for the forum, and look in the middle, right at the top where you will find an area titled "My Support Cases". You can reach your profile page by clicking on your name beside your post, or at the top left of this page underneath the title of the board.
Under “My Support Cases” you will find a link to the private board where you and the agent may exchange information. This should be checked on a frequent basis as the agent may be waiting for information from you before they can proceed with any actions.
To ensure you know when they have responded to you, at the top of your support case there is a drop down menu for support case options. Open that and choose "subscribe".
Please keep all correspondence regarding your issue in the private support portal.

Why can't I open RAW files taken with my Nikon D3200 in Elements 10?

Is there a fix in the works that will allow me to open RAW files taken with my Nikon D3200?

Actually the 7.1 camera raw update covers the D3200, but for whatever reason adobe has denied users of pse 10 that update.
Maybe it will still be released, but to me something else seems to be up, because in the past the latest version of elements (at least on windows) was always updated
to the latest version of camera raw at the same time photoshop was.
In the meantime you could download the 7.1 DNG converter to convert your files to dng copies which will then open in pse 10.
windows:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5389
mac:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5388
I know this stinks, but other than using the camera makers or aftermarket raw programs (lightroom), that's the best i can suggest for now.

PO Lead Time cannot capture the time taken for shipping!

Dear All
I understand that we have PO lead time = PO Processing Time (Working Day) + Planned Delivery Time (Calendar Day) + GR processing time (working day).
And this PO lead time will be added on top of my PO Creation Date to defer the actual goods availability date.
My question:
1. Planned delivery time is the time taken from vendor place to send out the goods to my warehouse. What if it is overseas purchase where goods leaving vendor's Port will first arrive in my country custom, and it will take 3 days to do clearance. once it is cleared, forwarding agent will delivery goods from my country custom to my warehouse. In this case, how do I capture it in SAP system for the planned delivery time as it has 4 periods of time now
a. Time taken from vendor's port to reach my country's port
b. Time taken for my country custom to do clearing
c. Time taken for forwarding agent to fetch goods from custom to my warehouse
d. Time taken for unpack, take out , count, inspect and put for use (GR processing time)
Do I need to use user Exit?
Thanks
Edited by: Daimos on Apr 27, 2009 6:52 PM

Dear dogboy.
I think we must use feature on the PO Confirmation Control (CC) Key at PO Item Level:
ED - Estimated Time of Departure from Overseas Port.
EA - Actual Time of Departure from Overseas Port.
EA - Estimated Time of Arrival
AA - Actual Time of Arrival
And the purchaser will maintain the value of each of the CC Key each time they are notified by the vendor.
And we need to come out with a Customised Report to capture those CC dates entered so that finance is able to prepare $ in advance if the moment the EA is maintained, meaning the estimated date of arrival at the Custom there.
But the problem is that PO User Exit is only at the header of Confirmation Control Key but not capture the DATE field we entered for each CC.
That was the problem I last encountered.

Date Taken lost on normal import (after successful initial migration)

USB stick with 100 photos exported from Aperture on another computer.
If I drag and drop the photos into OS X Photos all the photos import, but all then show with current date time as time taken and not the correct date taken timestamp.
The nutty thing is, if I do the exact same thing on my daughters Mac all the photos import and and they retain their correct date taken timestamp.
So it'd not an issue with the photos themselves.
Any ideas? Is there some setting or plist value that is causing this issue?

it appears the actual image is probably in place, but the *preview* is incorrect. clicking on the image to zoom in causes (the normal) "Loading...", followed by a zoomed in view of the *correct* image. zooming back out gives the normal view of the correct image. (*very* good to know!)

LR dt to be taken as BiIlling dt instead of Actual Goods issue dt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for