Mac version 4 times slower than PC version of CS3
Just ran the same Comp in CS3 on both my winXP PC with a dual-core 2.6GHZ processor, 4GB RAM and on my doible dual-core 2.6Ghz on my Mac with OSX 10.5 and 9GB RAM both with Multiprocessor option turned on.
I had purged the memory before hand and by the time the PC had completed the 139 frames the Mac was still on frame 30!
I was using a 3D camera move through a particle system with an Adobe Illustrator CS3 file in it and motion blur on. I am amazed that the Mac with twice the processing power is slower!
ANy ideas why this might happen.
I don't think anyone intentionally spoils his products, least of all Adobe, who actually were one of the companies that made Macs so popular in the old days due to Photoshop... You should simply consider the state in which the Mac is:
a)Apple have failed in providing a stable implementation for OpenGL ever since OSX arrived. Only 10.5.3 finally added native support for more advanced features, but peopel still have to use their own code and implement workarounds to boost performance
b)The processor swing 3 years ago left everyone with having to adapt their code. In case of Adobe with a ton of complex products this meant a lot of extra, wasted work just for that.
c)Now, on the threshold of native 64bit apps on the Mac, Apple again forced people to adapt and spent valuable time by not supporting Carbon any longer.
As you see, it is actually more a matter of Apple giving folks a hard time to keep up. If you took the development time and money spent on those conversions, sure we would see a different set of features/ more features in some programs.
Anyway, regarding your original problem: I'm not aware of a standardized benchmarking test for AE, which is probably not possible at all, given how many different footage types, layers, 3D, disk cache, media cache and whatnot you would need to consider. If you are seeing similar loss of performance in CS4, then something is really askew. I suggest you at least try to play with the number of cores to use for rendering. It should make a noticeable difference.
Mylenium
Similar Messages
-
Why is Firefox about 5 times slower than chrome on same tablet?
Hei, I love the idea behind firefox, but as mobile browser it feels very slow.
Using the zimbra ajax email client, firefox mobile on a powerfull sony xperia tablet z takes 25s to start up, and even then, usage is laggy. Chrome on the same device starts in 5s and works smooth.
About the same results I get with http://tagesschau.de firefox mobile takes several seconds to display the page readably, while chrome gives the wanted results immediately. I even deleted all history and private stuff, and don't use any addons in firefox, as I read at your help pages, but firefox feels far behind in usability compared to chrome.
Best regards,
HeikoAre these numbers pertaining to the first request only. Actually there has been quite a lot of changes in classloader and jasper compiler etc,. in sp4. Infact sp4 is proved to be much faster than earlier versions (Though I donot have exact figures with me, sp4 is faster than sp1). But some times it also depends on the settings like the debug level, type of session(lite or distributed) etc. At this time, as you are using only the defualt set up, I suggest you to try with other samples and verify is sp4 really 7-10 times slower than sp1. And then come up to a conclusion.
After having tested with multiple samples, with the "same parameters" on both the service packs, Still if you feel sp1 is faster or any further queries please get back to the forum. Please provide information about your settings also, so that I can investigate.
Thanks,
Rakesh. -
I have my Mac Book Pro with the OS Yesomite since a month and I am feeling that my mac is getting slower than before a month. I want to install OS Lion on my mac. I think i have a DVD of OS Lion which comes when i bougnt Mac laptop in 2011. Should i install OS Lion? What wil happen if i install OS Lion, do i lost my Applications or ...????
Hi, the last install dvd that came out for mac's was Snow Leopard,10.6.3. Lion is a download from apple. You cannot just install it over Yosemite. You would have to backup your drive to save files you want and do a clean install. You might want to look into getting more memory. You can run 8 Gig"s of memory on your Macbook Pro.If your Macbook Pro is getting really slow you might want to download EtreCheck and then post the results here.http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck Check out this article. http://support.apple.com/kb/PH19031
-
Why is the download/upload speed so slow on my MBA (about 5 times slower than my PC)?
Why is the download/upload speed so slow on my MBA (about 5 times slower than my PC)?
Are you on band 13 or band 4? 13 is the original LTE band and remains relatively congested. Band 4 is the XLTE band and is less congested and has higher overall potential bandwidth (15 MHz vs 10 MHz). Even so, 7 Mbps is more than enough for doing stuff on your phone and is not considered slow.
To check band,
dial *3001#12345#*
select serving cell info
frequency band will say 13 or 4
FInd an area with band 4 and retest. -
"localStorage.setItem" is 1000 times slower than in IE,Opera,Chrome.Is it normal?
Hi.
If you try to open this HTML page in Firefox 3.6.8, Firefox is 1000 times slower than IE 8,Opera 10 and Chrome. I cannot believe that localStorage.setItem is so slow in Firefox.
Is there a solution ?
Thanks in advance
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Storage test</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
var TestValue = "1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890";
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
localStorage.setItem(i, TestValue);
</script>
</body>
</html>Hi.
If you try to open this HTML page in Firefox 3.6.8, Firefox is 1000 times slower than IE 8,Opera 10 and Chrome. I cannot believe that localStorage.setItem is so slow in Firefox.
Is there a solution ?
Thanks in advance
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Storage test</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
var TestValue = "1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890";
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
localStorage.setItem(i, TestValue);
</script>
</body>
</html> -
Can VI Logger full version collect slower than 10 Hz?
I am using Logger Lite to collect data over prolonged periods (weeks to months) and would be happy with data collection rates of several seconds to several minutes between points. Logger Lite will not allow collection slower than 10 hz. The product sheet for Logger Full just says it supprts "low-speed and high-speed" logging. What does this mean? Does this mean that I can collect slower than 10 Hz? Thanks...
Hi!
I have been looking into your issue, and I imagine I understand why you would want to do this. You must be getting hundreds of results in a row that obtains the same value. In looking into what these "low-speed and high-speed" logging rates would be, I have found that they again range between 10 Hz and 60 Hz. Therefore, for your application it doesn't seem that VI logger is the right solution for you. I would recommend looking into some of our other solutions. For instance, if you were to use a version of LabVIEW, you would be able to create an application that could obtain values at most any rate you desired. Also, SignalExpress is another method that should have much more control than VI Logger.
I hope this information has been helpful. I would start by checking out the following product pages, and going from there.
LabVIEW Comparison
SignalExpress
Regards,
Jason W.
National Instruments
Applications Engineer -
Possible answer to LR 2.6 & 2.7 Seeming to run slower than earlier versions
I just downloaded and unpgraded from LR 2.6 to 2.7 on a Windows Vista 64-bit machine. Version 2.6 seemed to run a lot slower than 2.5. When I read the LR2.7 readme file on the download page I noticed one of the known issues is that at least ver. 2.7 runs slower when there are lots of files in the recycle bin. after I upgraded I emptied the recycle bin (Of almost 3000 files), and yes indeed performance did improve - dramatically. This also improved performance on LR 3 Beta 2.
Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried each idea in the order suggested. Unfortunately I have not yet solved the problem. In some circumstances, with certain paper profiles and no other color management in place, I get faulty prints but they have large areas of solid color in areas where there is a large amounts of color saturation in the original image. The faulty image below is printed to plain letter-sized paper ar Normal Quality. One clarification I wish to make is that my HP printer driver was not specifically a 64-bit driver, but rather 32-bit/64-bit driver compatable for Win 7.
I may try completely uninstalling LR before reinstalling, instead of a "repair-install" but I am still open to other suggestions.
Camron -
Firefox 4 is slow in loading web pages, much slower than previous version. WHY?
I am having problems with slow loading of pages, slower than Explorer for the same page for example.
What can be done?Have you tried (1) restarting your router, and (2) resetting the wifi on the iPad? To do #2, go to Settings, General, Reset, Reset Network Settings.
-
Windows Graphics 20 times slower than Linux Graphics?
Hello,
I am working on a java application to visualize 3D crystal structures. The atomes in the structure are drawn with "DrawOval" and "FillOval". Most of the processor time is spent on these two commands. Since I want to draw several thousands up to tens of thousands of atoms in real time, performance is a serious issue.
The program works well, however I made the following observance: The code running on Windows XP is about 20 tims slower (approx. 100 ms/frame vs. 5 ms/frame) than the same code running on the same computer under Linux!
Why is there such a big performance difference?
Is there a way to have the same performance on the windows machine as on the linux machine?
Is it necessary to use a different way to display circles?
Hardware: AMD dual Athlon, NVidia GeForce4 Ti 4400.
Thanks a lot for your help!I should say I'm surprised that there is such a big difference in performance, but if you want really great performance you might want to look into using OpenGL, even if you only do 2D graphics. 3D drivers are usually more optimized than the 2D counterparts (simply because of greater demand, unless you look into HighEnd CAD graphics cards).
Obviously OpenGL will only be faster if you've got accelerated 3D drivers for every platform. -
On Mac FAT32 Format Slower Than HFS
My 60GB iPod came in Windows FAT32 format which I liked since I could use it in disk mode on both Mac & Windows. However it seemed slow to start playing video and when switching between video files.
I did some timing tests and on the Mac FAT32 was much slower than HFS.
FAT32
Start playing movie = 12s
Stop movie and restart at same location = between 12-30s
HFS
Start playing movie = 5s
Stop movie and restart at same location = between 6s
If you have a Mac and your new 5G iPod is formatted for Windows, you may want to use the iPod Updated to restore and make the drive HFS.> Any NI techs have any insight as to why? Is there some Endian
> conversion being done internally? Any workarounds?
Well, there isn't any endian conversions going on. Both the file and
Mac memory model are big-endian. But the classic Mac file I/O is pretty
slow. The only thing I can recommend is to do the reads in larger
blocks. I've also heard some people claim that running their file I/O
bound apps underneath OSX will speed things up. In other words, running
an OS9 app underneath OSX is actually more efficient because it replaces
all of the OS9 code. So, you could give that a shot.
Greg McKaskle -
PreparedStatement is About 60 times slower than Statements
I am highly suprised that in my programme a normal statement is a lot faster than a Prepared Statement. I am posting below both the Programmes, in one I am using Prepared Statements and in another I am using normal Statements. My OS is Win NT My Database is SQL Server 7. THe progamme extracts data from a file and inserts records in the database. In the test case I had A file of about 1440 records ie. 1440 inserts are made to the database, The database table is very large ie. It has around 126 Columns.
So for inserting 1440 record froma file the Prepared Statements take around 7 Minutes . And for reading the same file and inserting the same no of records in the same database normal Statements Take only about 7 seconds. Now the JAcva docs clearly Specify that when we need to use the same stmt many times it is better to use Prepared Satements < the results that I am Getting is clear and complete violation of what java docs say.
Here is the code with Prepared Statements
package mps.mpsPTLF;
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.Calendar;
import java.util.Date;
import gen.genCommon.genConnectionPool.*;
import gen.genCommon.*;
public class PTLFProcessor
private static clsLogFile moLogFile = new clsLogFile("");
private gen.genCommon.genConnectionPool.SharedConnectionPool mConnPool = SharedConnectionPool.getInstance(2);
FileReader fPTLF = null;
BufferedReader brPTLF = null;
//**************** Begin Constructor declaration ************************
To intialize the class variables for new Fee
public PTLFProcessor(String pathPTLF) throws GenException
try
fPTLF = new FileReader(pathPTLF);
brPTLF = new BufferedReader(fPTLF);
catch (Exception e)
throw new GenException("Error Accessing file : " + pathPTLF + " - " + e.toString(),e );
//**************** End Constructor declaration ************************
public void PTLFGetData() throws GenException
char pcData[];
int HEADERSIZE = 6;
boolean pbEndOfFile = false;
boolean pbisFirstBlock = true;
int piBlocksize = 0;
int piOffset = 0;
int piRecordsize = 0;
String psRecordContent = "";
Connection pConn = null;
try
String psInsSql=" INSERT INTO FILE_PTLF_IN ( " +
" fpi_DAT_TIM , " +
" fpi_REC_TYP , " +
" fpi_CRD_LN , " +
" fpi_CRD_FIID , " +
" fpi_CRD_NUM , " +
" fpi_MBR_NUM , " +
" fpi_MER_LN , " +
" fpi_MER_FIID , " +
" fpi_MER_GRP , " +
" fpi_MER_REGN , " +
" fpi_MER_ID , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID , " +
" fpi_SHIFT_NUM , " +
" fpi_BATCH_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_LN , " +
" fpi_TERM_FIID , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_TRAN , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID_2 , " +
" fpi_REC_FRMT , " +
" fpi_MER_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_CLERK_ID , " +
" fpi_DATA_FLAG , " +
" fpi_TYP , " +
" fpi_RTE_STAT , " +
" fpi_ORIGINATOR , " +
" fpi_RESPONDER , " +
" fpi_ISS_CDE , " +
" fpi_ENTRY_TIM , " +
" fpi_EXIT_TIM , " +
" fpi_RE_ENTRY_TIM , " +
" fpi_TRAN_DAT , " +
" fpi_TRAN_TIM , " +
" fpi_POST_DAT , " +
" fpi_ACQ_ICHG_SETL_DAT , " +
" fpi_ISS_ICHG_SETL_DAT , " +
" fpi_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_NAME_LOC , " +
" fpi_TERM_OWNER_NAME , " +
" fpi_TERM_CITY , " +
" fpi_TERM_ST , " +
" fpi_TERM_CNTRY_CDE , " +
" fpi_BRCH_ID , " +
" fpi_USER_FLD2 , " +
" fpi_TERM_TIM_OFST , " +
" fpi_ACQ_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_RCV_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_TYP , " +
" fpi_CLERK_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_GRP , " +
" fpi_USER_ID , " +
" fpi_RETL_SIC_CDE , " +
" fpi_ORIG , " +
" fpi_DEST , " +
" fpi_TC , " +
" fpi_T , " +
" fpi_AA , " +
" fpi_C , " +
" fpi_CRD_TYP , " +
" fpi_ACCT , " +
" fpi_RESP_CDE , " +
" fpi_AMT_1 , " +
" fpi_AMT_2 , " +
" fpi_EXP_DAT , " +
" fpi_TRACK2 , " +
" fpi_PIN_OFST , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_INVOICE_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_INVOICE_NUM , " +
" fpi_AUTHORIZER , " +
" fpi_AUTH_IND , " +
" fpi_SHIFT_NUM_1 , " +
" fpi_BATCH_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_APPRV_CDE , " +
" fpi_APPRV_CDE_LGTH , " +
" fpi_ICHG_RESP , " +
" fpi_PSEUDO_TERM_ID , " +
" fpi_RFRL_PHONE , " +
" fpi_DFT_CAPTURE_FLG , " +
" fpi_SETL_FLAG , " +
" fpi_RVRL_CDE , " +
" fpi_REA_FOR_CHRGBCK , " +
" fpi_NUM_OF_CHRGBCK , " +
" fpi_PT_SRV_COND_CDE , " +
" fpi_PT_SRV_ENTRY_MDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_IND2 , " +
" fpi_ORIG_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_CONV_RATE , " +
" fpi_SETL_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_SETL_CONV_RATE , " +
" fpi_CONV_DAT_TIM , " +
" fpi_IMP_IND , " +
" fpi_AVAIL_BAL , " +
" fpi_LEDG_BAL , " +
" fpi_AMT_ON_HOLD , " +
" fpi_TTL_FLOAT , " +
" fpi_CUR_FLOAT , " +
" fpi_ADJ_SETL_IMPACT_FLG , " +
" fpi_PBF1 , " +
" fpi_PBF2 , " +
" fpi_PBF3 , " +
" fpi_PBF4 , " +
" fpi_FRWD_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_CRD_ACCPT_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_CRD_ISS_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_MSG_TYP , " +
" fpi_ORIG_TRAN_TIM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_TRAN_DAT , " +
" fpi_ORIG_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_B24_POST_DAT , " +
" fpi_EXCP_RSN_CDE , " +
" fpi_OVRRDE_FLG , " +
" fpi_ADDR , " +
" fpi_ZIP_CDE , " +
" fpi_ADDR_VRFY_STAT , " +
" fpi_PIN_IND , " +
" fpi_PIN_TRIES , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_TS_DAT , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_TS_TIM , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_HLDS_LVL , " +
" fpi_USER_FLD5 , " +
" fpi_LEN , " +
" fpi_INFO )" +
" VALUES ( " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
pConn = mConnPool.getConnection();
PreparedStatement pStmt = pConn.prepareStatement(psInsSql);
while (!pbEndOfFile)
pcData = new char [HEADERSIZE]; // Reading each Block Header
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, HEADERSIZE);
piBlocksize = Integer.parseInt (new String (pcData));
piOffset = HEADERSIZE;
while (piOffset < piBlocksize)
{ // Read the records upto end of block
pcData = new char [HEADERSIZE]; // Reading each Record Header
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, HEADERSIZE);
piRecordsize = Integer.parseInt (new String (pcData));
piOffset += HEADERSIZE;
pcData = new char [piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE]; // Reading each Record Content
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE);
psRecordContent = new String (pcData);
piOffset += piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE;
moLogFile.writeToLog(psRecordContent);
if (pbisFirstBlock)
if (!psRecordContent.startsWith ("TH"))
throw new GenException ("Invalid File Format, missing 'TH'");
pcData = new char [HEADERSIZE]; // Reading next Record Header
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, HEADERSIZE);
piRecordsize = Integer.parseInt (new String (pcData));
piOffset += HEADERSIZE;
pcData = new char [piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE];// Reading next Record Content (Must be FH)
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE);
psRecordContent = new String (pcData);
piOffset += piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE;
if (!psRecordContent.startsWith ("FH"))
throw new GenException ("File Header Not Found");
pbisFirstBlock = false;
else if (psRecordContent.startsWith ("DR"))
psRecordContent = psRecordContent.substring(2);
/* if (psRecordContent.length() != 1820 ) // && psRecordContent.length() != 846)
// insert in error table
continue;
if ( psRecordContent.substring(453-1, 455).equals ("000") || psRecordContent.substring(453-1, 455).equals ("001") )
pStmt.setString (1, psRecordContent.substring(1-1,19));
pStmt.setString (2, psRecordContent.substring(20-1,21));
pStmt.setString (3, psRecordContent.substring(22-1,25));
pStmt.setString (4, psRecordContent.substring(26-1,29));
pStmt.setString (5, psRecordContent.substring(30-1,48));
pStmt.setString (6, psRecordContent.substring(49-1,51));
pStmt.setString (7, psRecordContent.substring(52-1,55));
pStmt.setString (8, psRecordContent.substring(56-1,59));
pStmt.setString (9, psRecordContent.substring(60-1,63));
pStmt.setString (10, psRecordContent.substring(64-1,67));
pStmt.setString (11, psRecordContent.substring(68-1,86));
pStmt.setString (12, psRecordContent.substring(87-1,102));
pStmt.setString (13, psRecordContent.substring(103-1,105));
pStmt.setString (14, psRecordContent.substring(106-1,108));
pStmt.setString (15, psRecordContent.substring(109-1,112));
pStmt.setString (16, psRecordContent.substring(113-1,116));
pStmt.setString (17, psRecordContent.substring(117-1,132));
pStmt.setString (18, psRecordContent.substring(133-1,140));
pStmt.setString (19, psRecordContent.substring(141-1,156));
pStmt.setString (20, psRecordContent.substring(157-1,157));
pStmt.setString (21, psRecordContent.substring(158-1,176));
pStmt.setString (22, psRecordContent.substring(177-1,182));
pStmt.setString (23, psRecordContent.substring(183-1,183));
pStmt.setString (24, psRecordContent.substring(184-1,187));
pStmt.setString (25, psRecordContent.substring(188-1,189));
pStmt.setString (26, psRecordContent.substring(190-1,190));
pStmt.setString (27, psRecordContent.substring(191-1,191));
pStmt.setString (28, psRecordContent.substring(192-1,193));
pStmt.setString (29, psRecordContent.substring(194-1,212));
pStmt.setString (30, psRecordContent.substring(213-1,231));
pStmt.setString (31, psRecordContent.substring(232-1,250));
pStmt.setString (32, psRecordContent.substring(251-1,256));
pStmt.setString (33, psRecordContent.substring(257-1,264));
pStmt.setString (34, psRecordContent.substring(265-1,270));
pStmt.setString (35, psRecordContent.substring(271-1,276));
pStmt.setString (36, psRecordContent.substring(277-1,282));
pStmt.setString (37, psRecordContent.substring(283-1,294));
pStmt.setString (38, psRecordContent.substring(295-1,319));
pStmt.setString (39, psRecordContent.substring(320-1,341));
pStmt.setString (40, psRecordContent.substring(342-1,354));
pStmt.setString (41, psRecordContent.substring(355-1,357));
pStmt.setString (42, psRecordContent.substring(358-1,359));
pStmt.setString (43, psRecordContent.substring(360-1,363));
pStmt.setString (44, psRecordContent.substring(364-1,366));
pStmt.setString (45, psRecordContent.substring(367-1,371));
pStmt.setString (46, psRecordContent.substring(372-1,382));
pStmt.setString (47, psRecordContent.substring(383-1,393));
pStmt.setString (48, psRecordContent.substring(394-1,395));
pStmt.setString (49, psRecordContent.substring(396-1,401));
pStmt.setString (50, psRecordContent.substring(402-1,405));
pStmt.setString (51, psRecordContent.substring(406-1,413));
pStmt.setString (52, psRecordContent.substring(414-1,417));
pStmt.setString (53, psRecordContent.substring(418-1,421));
pStmt.setString (54, psRecordContent.substring(422-1,425));
pStmt.setString (55, psRecordContent.substring(426-1,427));
pStmt.setString (56, psRecordContent.substring(428-1,428));
pStmt.setString (57, psRecordContent.substring(429-1,430));
pStmt.setString (58, psRecordContent.substring(431-1,431));
pStmt.setString (59, psRecordContent.substring(432-1,433));
pStmt.setString (60, psRecordContent.substring(434-1,452));
pStmt.setString (61, psRecordContent.substring(453-1,455));
pStmt.setString (62, psRecordContent.substring(456-1,474));
pStmt.setString (63, psRecordContent.substring(475-1,493));
pStmt.setString (64, psRecordContent.substring(494-1,497));
pStmt.setString (65, psRecordContent.substring(498-1,537));
pStmt.setString (66, psRecordContent.substring(538-1,553));
pStmt.setString (67, psRecordContent.substring(554-1,565));
pStmt.setString (68, psRecordContent.substring(566-1,575));
pStmt.setString (69, psRecordContent.substring(576-1,585));
pStmt.setString (70, psRecordContent.substring(586-1,601));
pStmt.setString (71, psRecordContent.substring(602-1,602));
pStmt.setString (72, psRecordContent.substring(603-1,605));
pStmt.setString (73, psRecordContent.substring(606-1,608));
pStmt.setString (74, psRecordContent.substring(609-1,616));
pStmt.setString (75, psRecordContent.substring(617-1,617));
pStmt.setString (76, psRecordContent.substring(618-1,625));
pStmt.setString (77, psRecordContent.substring(626-1,629));
pStmt.setString (78, psRecordContent.substring(630-1,649));
pStmt.setString (79, psRecordContent.substring(650-1,650));
pStmt.setString (80, psRecordContent.substring(651-1,651));
pStmt.setString (81, psRecordContent.substring(652-1,653));
pStmt.setString (82, psRecordContent.substring(654-1,655));
pStmt.setString (83, psRecordContent.substring(656-1,656));
pStmt.setString (84, psRecordContent.substring(657-1,658));
pStmt.setString (85, psRecordContent.substring(659-1,661));
pStmt.setString (86, psRecordContent.substring(662-1,662));
pStmt.setString (87, psRecordContent.substring(663-1,665));
pStmt.setString (88, psRecordContent.substring(666-1,668));
pStmt.setString (89, psRecordContent.substring(669-1,676));
pStmt.setString (90, psRecordContent.substring(677-1,679));
pStmt.setString (91, psRecordContent.substring(680-1,687));
pStmt.setString (92, psRecordContent.substring(688-1,706));
pStmt.setString (93, psRecordContent.substring(707-1,707));
pStmt.setString (94, psRecordContent.substring(708-1,708));
pStmt.setString (95, psRecordContent.substring(709-1,709));
pStmt.setString (96, psRecordContent.substring(710-1,710));
pStmt.setString (97, psRecordContent.substring(711-1,711));
pStmt.setString (98, psRecordContent.substring(712-1,712));
pStmt.setString (99, psRecordContent.substring(713-1,713));
pStmt.setString (100, psRecordContent.substring(714-1,714));
pStmt.setString (101, psRecordContent.substring(715-1,715));
pStmt.setString (102, psRecordContent.substring(716-1,716));
pStmt.setString (103, psRecordContent.substring(717-1,717));
pStmt.setString (104, psRecordContent.substring(718-1,728));
pStmt.setString (105, psRecordContent.substring(729-1,739));
pStmt.setString (106, psRecordContent.substring(740-1,750));
pStmt.setString (107, psRecordContent.substring(751-1,754));
pStmt.setString (108, psRecordContent.substring(755-1,762));
pStmt.setString (109, psRecordContent.substring(763-1,766));
pStmt.setString (110, psRecordContent.substring(767-1,778));
pStmt.setString (111, psRecordContent.substring(779-1,782));
pStmt.setString (112, psRecordContent.substring(783-1,785));
pStmt.setString (113, psRecordContent.substring(786-1,786));
pStmt.setString (114, psRecordContent.substring(787-1,806));
pStmt.setString (115, psRecordContent.substring(807-1,815));
pStmt.setString (116, psRecordContent.substring(816-1,816));
pStmt.setString (117, psRecordContent.substring(817-1,817));
pStmt.setString (118, psRecordContent.substring(818-1,818));
pStmt.setString (119, psRecordContent.substring(819-1,824));
pStmt.setString (120, psRecordContent.substring(825-1,832));
pStmt.setString (121, psRecordContent.substring(833-1,833));
pStmt.setString (122, psRecordContent.substring(834-1,866));
pStmt.setString (123, psRecordContent.substring(867-1,870));
pStmt.setString (124, psRecordContent.substring(871-1,1070));
// if (pStmt.executeUpdate() != 1)
// throw new GenException ("Insertion failed");
String psMsgType = psRecordContent.substring (184-1, 187);
if (true)//updateTable (conn, pstmt, pstmt1, pstmt2, psRecordContent, out, bw))
if (psMsgType.equals ("0500") || psMsgType.equals ("0520"))
//piSettlementDR++;
if (psMsgType.equals ("0210"))
//piUpdatedDR++;
if (psMsgType.equals ("0220") || psMsgType.equals ("0320") || psMsgType.equals ("0420"))
//reversalDR++;
//validDR++;
//totalDR++;
else if (psRecordContent.startsWith ("FT"))
pcData = new char [HEADERSIZE]; // Reading next Record Header
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, HEADERSIZE);
piRecordsize = Integer.parseInt (new String (pcData));
piOffset += HEADERSIZE;
pcData = new char [piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE];// Reading next Record Content (Must be TT)
brPTLF.read (pcData, 0, piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE);
psRecordContent = new String (pcData);
piOffset += piRecordsize - HEADERSIZE;
if (!psRecordContent.startsWith ("TT"))
throw new GenException ("Total Trailer not Found.");
pbEndOfFile = true;
} // while (piOffset < piBlocksize)
} // while (!pbEndOfFile)
brPTLF.close();
fPTLF.close();
pStmt.close();
catch (Exception e)
moLogFile.printStackTrace(e);
finally
mConnPool.free(pConn);
public static void main(String args[])
try
PTLFProcessor test=new PTLFProcessor("c:\\test.txt");
test.PTLFGetData();
catch (Exception e)
clsLogFile.printStackTrace(e);
}Here is the code with Normal statements
//package mps.mpsPTLF;
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.Calendar;
import java.util.Date;
import gen.genCommon.genConnectionPool.*;
import gen.genCommon.*;
public class PTLFProcessor1
private static clsLogFile moLogFile = new clsLogFile("");
private gen.genCommon.genConnectionPool.SharedConnectionPool mConnPool = SharedConnectionPool.getInstance(2);
FileReader fPTLF = null;
BufferedReader brPTLF = null;
//**************** Begin Constructor declaration ************************
To intialize the class variables for new Fee
public PTLFProcessor1(String pathPTLF) throws GenException
try
fPTLF = new FileReader(pathPTLF);
brPTLF = new BufferedReader(fPTLF);
catch (Exception e)
throw new GenException("Error Accessing file : " + pathPTLF + " - " + e.toString(),e );
//**************** End Constructor declaration ************************
public void PTLFGetData() throws GenException
char pcData[];
int HEADERSIZE = 6;
boolean pbEndOfFile = false;
boolean pbisFirstBlock = true;
int piBlocksize = 0;
int piOffset = 0;
int piRecordsize = 0;
String psRecordContent = "";
Connection pConn = null;
int cnt=0;
try
String psInsSql=" INSERT INTO FILE_PTLF_IN ( " +
" fpi_DAT_TIM , " +
" fpi_REC_TYP , " +
" fpi_CRD_LN , " +
" fpi_CRD_FIID , " +
" fpi_CRD_NUM , " +
" fpi_MBR_NUM , " +
" fpi_MER_LN , " +
" fpi_MER_FIID , " +
" fpi_MER_GRP , " +
" fpi_MER_REGN , " +
" fpi_MER_ID , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID , " +
" fpi_SHIFT_NUM , " +
" fpi_BATCH_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_LN , " +
" fpi_TERM_FIID , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_TRAN , " +
" fpi_TERM_ID_2 , " +
" fpi_REC_FRMT , " +
" fpi_MER_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_CLERK_ID , " +
" fpi_DATA_FLAG , " +
" fpi_TYP , " +
" fpi_RTE_STAT , " +
" fpi_ORIGINATOR , " +
" fpi_RESPONDER , " +
" fpi_ISS_CDE , " +
" fpi_ENTRY_TIM , " +
" fpi_EXIT_TIM , " +
" fpi_RE_ENTRY_TIM , " +
" fpi_TRAN_DAT , " +
" fpi_TRAN_TIM , " +
" fpi_POST_DAT , " +
" fpi_ACQ_ICHG_SETL_DAT , " +
" fpi_ISS_ICHG_SETL_DAT , " +
" fpi_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_NAME_LOC , " +
" fpi_TERM_OWNER_NAME , " +
" fpi_TERM_CITY , " +
" fpi_TERM_ST , " +
" fpi_TERM_CNTRY_CDE , " +
" fpi_BRCH_ID , " +
" fpi_USER_FLD2 , " +
" fpi_TERM_TIM_OFST , " +
" fpi_ACQ_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_RCV_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_TERM_TYP , " +
" fpi_CLERK_ID_1 , " +
" fpi_GRP , " +
" fpi_USER_ID , " +
" fpi_RETL_SIC_CDE , " +
" fpi_ORIG , " +
" fpi_DEST , " +
" fpi_TC , " +
" fpi_T , " +
" fpi_AA , " +
" fpi_C , " +
" fpi_CRD_TYP , " +
" fpi_ACCT , " +
" fpi_RESP_CDE , " +
" fpi_AMT_1 , " +
" fpi_AMT_2 , " +
" fpi_EXP_DAT , " +
" fpi_TRACK2 , " +
" fpi_PIN_OFST , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_INVOICE_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_INVOICE_NUM , " +
" fpi_AUTHORIZER , " +
" fpi_AUTH_IND , " +
" fpi_SHIFT_NUM_1 , " +
" fpi_BATCH_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_APPRV_CDE , " +
" fpi_APPRV_CDE_LGTH , " +
" fpi_ICHG_RESP , " +
" fpi_PSEUDO_TERM_ID , " +
" fpi_RFRL_PHONE , " +
" fpi_DFT_CAPTURE_FLG , " +
" fpi_SETL_FLAG , " +
" fpi_RVRL_CDE , " +
" fpi_REA_FOR_CHRGBCK , " +
" fpi_NUM_OF_CHRGBCK , " +
" fpi_PT_SRV_COND_CDE , " +
" fpi_PT_SRV_ENTRY_MDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_IND2 , " +
" fpi_ORIG_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_AUTH_CONV_RATE , " +
" fpi_SETL_CRNCY_CDE , " +
" fpi_SETL_CONV_RATE , " +
" fpi_CONV_DAT_TIM , " +
" fpi_IMP_IND , " +
" fpi_AVAIL_BAL , " +
" fpi_LEDG_BAL , " +
" fpi_AMT_ON_HOLD , " +
" fpi_TTL_FLOAT , " +
" fpi_CUR_FLOAT , " +
" fpi_ADJ_SETL_IMPACT_FLG , " +
" fpi_PBF1 , " +
" fpi_PBF2 , " +
" fpi_PBF3 , " +
" fpi_PBF4 , " +
" fpi_FRWD_INST_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_CRD_ACCPT_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_CRD_ISS_ID_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_MSG_TYP , " +
" fpi_ORIG_TRAN_TIM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_TRAN_DAT , " +
" fpi_ORIG_SEQ_NUM , " +
" fpi_ORIG_B24_POST_DAT , " +
" fpi_EXCP_RSN_CDE , " +
" fpi_OVRRDE_FLG , " +
" fpi_ADDR , " +
" fpi_ZIP_CDE , " +
" fpi_ADDR_VRFY_STAT , " +
" fpi_PIN_IND , " +
" fpi_PIN_TRIES , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_TS_DAT , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_TS_TIM , " +
" fpi_PRE_AUTH_HLDS_LVL , " +
" fpi_USER_FLD5 , " +
" fpi_LEN , " +
" fpi_INFO )" +
" VALUES ";
( " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
" ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, " +
pConn = mConnPool.getConnection();
Statement Stmt=pConn.createStatemenDear Sir,
The problem with the prepared statement is that it gets prepared once the compilation is over and the program is running in memory, what effectively this means is that at the compilation time the process of putting togather the statement has been discounted and while compiling , only the javac or compiler is in memory while at runtime the user input is required so streams are in memory and also the JVM and obviously your code.
Anyways java is a little slower than other languages and processes your code as and when user interacts with code so it is not the fastest it you want to make it perform calculations or accept user input or as in ur case prepareStatement.
your normal SQL statement is taken care of at compile time and is therefore faster.
regards,
[email protected] -
Binding is 60 times slower than non-binding
Hi,
I have a quite serious problem using binding with Toplink. My configuration is
Toplink 9.0.4.5
Oracle 10g EE 10.2.0.4.0 (64 Bit, Partitioning, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options)
Oracle Thin JDBC Driver (either 11.2.0.1.0 or 10.2.0.4.0)
running in a Tomcat 5.5 environment.
Our usual configuration is with BindAllParameters = "true", which is fine in 99% of all cases. But in one special case, which is the search functionality of our application (insurance agents management application),
a SQL is about 60 times slower with binding, than without binding. I attach the SQL at the end of the message, but what is quite special about it is, that it uses quite a large amount of "IN" clauses. I found an earlier
posting stating, that Toplink (or Oracle JDBC) has a problem with IN-clauses and binding. Can anyone confirm this?
As I said, the SQL is part of a people search functionality, so there is a great amount of different variations. Not all variations show this behaviour, so I assume, that Oracle probably uses different execution plans regarding using prepared statments or direct execution. Can anyone confirm this also?
Lastly, is there any way to record the execution plan inside the Tomcat application?
Thanks in advance for any help, as I said before, this problem is currently very critical, since we are 2 weeks before production,
Thorsten.
Here is the example SQL (with the bind varaibles already replaced):
/* Formatted on 2010/02/08 10:27 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT t0.partner_id
FROM aidatint.papartner t0
WHERE ( ( ( ( ( ( (t0.schwebe_kz = 'S')
AND (t0.aktgfid_rid = '126562119515400004')
OR ( (t0.schwebe_kz = 'O')
AND (t0.aktgfid_rid <> '126562119515400004')
AND ( (t0.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL)
OR (t0.gueltigvon_dt < t0.gueltigbis_dt)
AND (t0.mcname_txt = 'MEIER')
AND (t0.partner_id IN (
SELECT DISTINCT t1.partner_id
FROM aidatint.paadresse t1
WHERE ( ( ( ( (t1.schwebe_kz = 'S'
AND (t1.aktgfid_rid =
'126562119515400004'
OR ( (t1.schwebe_kz = 'O'
AND (t1.aktgfid_rid <>
'126562119515400004'
AND ( (t1.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL
OR (t1.gueltigvon_dt <
t1.gueltigbis_dt
AND (t1.mcort_txt = 'KOELN')
AND (t0.partner_id IN (
SELECT t2.partner_id
FROM aidatint.paparolle t2
WHERE ( ( ( ( ( (t2.schwebe_kz = 'S')
AND (t2.aktgfid_rid =
'126562119515400004'
OR ( (t2.schwebe_kz = 'O')
AND (t2.aktgfid_rid <>
'126562119515400004'
AND ( (t2.gueltigvon_dt <=
TO_DATE ('20100208',
'YYYYMMDD')
AND ( (t2.gueltigbis_dt >
TO_DATE ('20100208',
'YYYYMMDD'
OR (t2.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL)
AND (t2.geschobjtyp_typ = 'VMVT')
AND (t2.goid_id IN (
SELECT t3.vermittlervertragid_id
FROM aidatint.prvvsvermittlervertrag t3
WHERE ( ( ( (t3.schwebe_kz = 'S')
AND (t3.aktgfid_rid =
'126562119515400004'
OR ( (t3.schwebe_kz = 'O')
AND (t3.aktgfid_rid <>
'126562119515400004'
AND (t3.kumulnr_txt IN (
SELECT t4.bereichsnr_txt
FROM aidatint.prvvsstrukturangausdienst t4
WHERE ( ( ( ( (t4.schwebe_kz =
'S'
AND (t4.aktgfid_rid =
'126562119515400004'
OR ( (t4.schwebe_kz =
'O'
AND (t4.aktgfid_rid <>
'126562119515400004'
AND ( (t4.gueltigvon_dt <=
TO_DATE
('20100208',
'YYYYMMDD'
AND ( (t4.gueltigbis_dt >
TO_DATE
('20100208',
'YYYYMMDD'
OR (t4.gueltigbis_dt IS NULL
AND (t4.schluessel_txt LIKE
'##TH###1###4%'
)Odd, I would assume it is a db/JDBC issue. You can confirm this by trying the same through raw JDBC, or enabling the TopLink profiler.
It could be related to the large size of the SQL and large number of parameters to the call. You may wish to check with the JDBC group to see what the issue is.
You can disable binding for just this query, to get the binding benefit elsewhere and avoid the binding issue for just this query.
EclipseLink: http://www.eclipselink.org -
Printing from Acrobat Reader Linux is many time slower than from Windows Reader
The users are complaining to me that same file is printing one page every couple minute under Linux, while under Windows pages from the same file print one after another very quickly.
Hardware is not affecting that as they are using dual-boot Fedora 14 and XP on the same machines, printing to the same HP LaserJet printer over JetDirect.Also, I am noticing that scrolling page thumbnails and flipping pages is many times slower under Linux than under Windows on the same machine, but CPU utilization is very low.
Can one of the Linux Acrobat developers look into performance issues please? -
After Effects CC 2014.0.2 rendering slower than previous version with identical settings
Is this a known issue? Can't find confirmation just some mention of it.
I'm on an 27" iMac with 32GB Ram and SSD. Latest OSX. Latest After Effects.
I first noticed after accidentally opening a file in CC2014 when asked to supply a client a render. It takes almost 3 times longer to render a file. I've checked preferences on latest on and previous version of AE and everything seems identical. Am I going mad?
I guess I could stay on the previous version for a while but hardly ideal as I'm paying for access to the latest versions and need to move up eventually.
Help much appreciated.
AnthonyYes everything is identical. I setup a file ready to render and opened it in each version and rendered. I did this with an old large project file and also a new test file with a very simple 2 minute loop of a square moving left to right.
Beginning to hope the upcoming update fixes it somehow though would prefer to fix and learn something from this... -
Why is the boot time on my mac pro 2010 slower than my 2010 core 2 duo 13 mbp?
Why is the boot time on my mac pro with clean install of lion around 34 sec on my mac pro 2010 2.8 quad core, when it is only around 17 sec on my 13 mbp 2.67 core 2 duo?
The mac pro uses around 13 seconds from i hit the power button til i hear the chime and see the grey screen.
Is it because it uses time to find the wireless keyboard, trackpad and cinema display?
Mac pro has 16 gb ram and 240 gb ocz agility 3 ssd, macbook pro has a intel 120 gb ssd (320 i think) and 8 gb of ram, so the mac pro has more umpf....Well it might take a little longer since POST (power-on self test) needs to check more memory.
But try doing a smc and pram reset and see if that helps.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Accounts rceievable analysis report with VAT inclusion
Hi All, I have been asked to include the VAT amount paid by each customer in the Accounts recievable and payable analysis report. The problem is posting for VAT goes to General Ledger and the total amount is posted to Customer. The report currently i
-
Problem in obtaining collection of parameters onto my backing bean
Hi All, I am working on a page 'browse.jsp' inside Alfresco CMS to implement a customization of mine wherin in the "details" view, inclusion of checkboxes besides the document names and their checking and submission will result in thier display in a
-
Russian Character is not displaying Correctly in HTML Attachment
Hi, We are converting the TRIP Details into HTML Format and sending this as attachment by using the function module 'SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1' It is working fine if the Content are in English, But if there is any Russian characters, Junk character is ge
-
Opening any report in SPM shows Server Error
Hi Experts, We have recently upgraded SPM from 2.0 to 3.0 SP3, where when we click any report a small pop-up on the right corner shows "Server Error". We have taken the http watch trace and it shows as 404 - for URL - http://<systemhostname>:<port>/s
-
Iwork Apps does not see iCloud
on my iMac, pages, keynote, and numbers can't see iCloud as an option to open or save documents. Preview and the Text application on my Mac can use icloud just fine. Are there any settings or troubleshooting steps I can do?