Make Condition exclusion type to be active for different condition records

Hi
We are currently using three condition types in the pricing procedure.
Say for eg. YWBP- F Charges, YADJ -C charges and YHDG-Handling fee
We have set condition exclusion for the combination of YWBP and YHDG and
YADJ and YHDG.
YHDG condition type has two condition records.. say for eg. 512 and 596.
The materials defined for 512 condition records is YAU and YAX and for 596 is YAV.
Now my question is that whenever condition types YADJ  gets picked up fo  YAU, YAX  and YAV then condition type YHDG shouldnot get picked up. (The above condition exclusion group will perfectly caters to this requirement.) but now the cache is the business has a requirement that
When ever condition type YWBP gets picked up for the material 'YAV', then the condition type 'YHDG'  (with 596 table condition records) should also get pick up in the sales order.
Is there any way to achieve this with current settings of condition exclusion indicator.
Thanks in advance.

Hello Vicky
Not knowing the relationship between ZCPD and ZDUT, it is hard to answer your question.  I am not sure how ZDUT is affected by ZCPD.
By your  description, there is a requirement in the pricing procedure that is setting the exclusion indicator to X for ZCPD under certain conditions. May be that is not a right solution for your situation.
I would suggest using condition exclusion groups and then assigning condition exclusion group to the pricing procedure to meet your requirement. Let ZCPD be in  group 1, all other conditions that you want excluded when ZCPD is present  ( but not ZDUT) in group 2. Then use the exclusive option while assigning to the pricing procedure.
All these config steps can be found here:
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Basic Functions/Pricing/Condition Exclusion/Condition Exclusion For Groups Of Conditions
Link: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/93/7432eb546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • Check material movement types that are activated for transfer to GTS in 4.7 ecc.

    Hi
    We are using 4.7 Version of R3 and GTS version 10.
    Please let me know how to check the list of movement types that are activated for transfer to GTS.
    Thanks & Regards
    Karthi

    Hi Karthi,
    Usually your questions are of a technical nature, so I assume the answer for you in this case is table /SAPSLL/TLER3B.  Select where APEVS_R3 = 'MM0C', and either CUSRV_R3, GCUMA_R3 or GRIMA_R3 are not initial.  The result in field BARVS_R3 contains the Movement Type and Movement Indicator (KZBEW) concatenated.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Dave

  • Issue regarding condition pricing date as system date for some condition types in sales order

    Hi
    I have already created a sales order on 30.04.2014. Today I am adding new line item to sales order in VA02 transaction. in this order new line items condition pricing date for conditions JEX2,JECX should show as 12.06.2014. But currently it is showing as 30.04.2014. I need condition pricing date as system date for above conditions.
    Regards
    prashant

    Hi
    When I am changing pricing date VBKD-PRSDT in sales order header . It is changing the condition pricing date for all. Sales order is created on 04.06.2014. I have added line item 150 on 14.06.2014.
    After adding line item 150 , there I have changed the pricing date as 14.06.2014. in sales A tab of item 150. But still it is taking from Sales order header date as 04.06.2014 for all conditions. But my requirement is for line item it should take as system date for some conditions like JEX2,JECX& JA1Y but for other conditions it will take as Order creation date. Please suggest. I have also attached screen shot below. please go through it.
    Regards
    PK
    Sales order header change mode VA02
    Here pricing date VBKD-PRSDT = 04.06.2016
    Item change mode
    I have added new line item 150 on 14.06.2014
    Changed the condition pricing date to 14.06.2014 & saved
    After saving I have gone to Va02 screen of line item 150
    & there I have gone to condition pricing date field from item condition tab
    for JEX2 condition type but still here condition pricing date is showing as
    04.06.2014 as below.
    Condition pricing date
    My requirement is like this
    For some particular conditions like JEX2  condition pricing date will take as system
    date instead sales order creation date when I will add a new item 150 on
    14.06.2014.but for other conditions it will show as order creation date for the
    same line item 150 .

  • Bapi or FM to Create Or Update multidimensional freight conditions for different scale id for different conditions

    Hello all,
    I want to create or update multidimensional freight conditions for different scale id for different conditions.
    I cound not find any Bapi or FM for this. I uesd BDC for this but i can not rely on it.
    If any one have other solution than IDOC then suggest me.
    Any BAPI or FM available then suggest me.

    Hi Gowri Rao,
    Can you please tell me, what values do you pass in table 'IT_PRICING_CONDITIONS'?
    Regards,
    Pratik

  • Number range userexit same type of PR but  for different Plant

    I would like to have the same type of PR but  for different Plant, I would like to have different Number range.
    The exit  MM06E003 M06B0003 Mo=06B0004  not work for ME51N.
    Any other  exits help for this

    HI
    Put this code in  EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_009
    DATA pr_header TYPE mereq_header.
    DATA pr_items  TYPE mmpur_requisition_items.
    DATA pr_item   TYPE mmpur_requisition_item.
    DATA: l_item   TYPE mereq_item.
    DATA: l_zmm_numrange    TYPE zmm_numrange.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING eban TO l_item.
    CALL METHOD im_req_header->get_items
      RECEIVING
        re_items = pr_items.
    READ TABLE pr_items INTO pr_item INDEX 1.
    CALL METHOD pr_item-item->get_data
      RECEIVING
        re_data = l_item.
    CHECK l_item-werks = '6301'.
    CALL METHOD im_req_header->get_data
      RECEIVING
        re_data = pr_header.
    SELECT SINGLE * INTO l_zmm_numrange
       FROM zmm_numrange
       WHERE  werks EQ l_item-werks
         AND doc_type EQ 'PR'
         AND bsart EQ pr_header-bsart.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      ex_range   =  l_zmm_numrange-numki.
    ENDIF.

  • Different execution plan for same query but for different condition value

    Hi All,
    I'm facing a strange situation where same query for different condition not working.
    1--
    Select  top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock) 
    where feecode ='OW4'
    2--
    Select  top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
    where feecode ='BTE'
    1st query is returning result easily but 2nd query is taking too long. Column
    feecode has already Non-clustered index and Clustered index is also available for another col RevenueSID.
    I was surprised when checked the query execution plan for both the above queries  which is quite different (as per attached below). Can anyone suggest me the reason behind it.
    And solution for the same. One more thing that data for feecode BTE is inserting through different source instead of others feecode and table contains more than 300 million rows.

    When I speak with people inside Microsoft who work with the optimizer, the refuse to accept the work "bug" when a query produces the correct result, but with a suboptimal plan. They prefer to use the word "limitation".
    The limitation here is that when the optimizer compares two plans, it only looks at the estimated cost. As far as I know, it does not perform any analysis from the perspective "what if the statistics are wrong"? They do provide the hint OPTIMIZE
    FOR UNKNOWN, but that does not work then there is a constant as in this case.
    The optimizer will surely distinguish between TOP 10 and TOP 10000000. With the latter, you have all reason to expect a Clustered Index Scan no matter which value you search for - unless you pick a value for which the histogram indicates that there are no
    rows.
    Interesting enough, I was able to reproduce the situation in my Northgale database, which is an inflated version of Northwind, and where statistics should be accurate.
    SELECT TOP 10 * FROM Orders WHERE EmployeeID = 8
    results in a CI scan, and so does also EmployeeID = 7, and even 5. There are only 2292 rows out of a total of 344305 rows. If I try EmployeeID 808 for which there are 1797, the optimizer goes for the index seek.
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

  • Iphone4s activation for different sim cards

    iPhone 4s,,IMEI *********.. i need to activate my iPhone4s for different simcards usage
    <Personal Information Edited by Host>

    The phone has to be officially unlocked by the original carrier, if this is supported.
    Apple can't unlock the phone, only the carrier can start this process.
    Check this article about it:
    iPhone: About unlocking

  • To make a status field readonly on Activity based on condition

    Can anyone help me with the validation formula that I need to use to make the activity status field readonly.
    My condition is :-
    If the Owner Id on the Activity <> login Id, then make status field readonly
    Thanks,
    NG

    Hi NG,
    Not 100% clear on what you are trying to achieve so I thought I'd offer the suggestions I thought most likely.
    1. If the Logged In User does not match the Activity Record Owner, then make the status field read only
    PRE('<Status>') = [<Status>] OR UserValue('<UserId>') = [<OwnerId>]
    i.e. Status value has not changed OR logged in user equal to record owner
    2. If the Logged In User matches the Activity Record Owner, then make the status field read only
    PRE('<Status>') = [<Status>] OR UserValue('<UserId>') {NOT EQUAL} [<OwnerId>]
    +i.e. Status value has not changed OR logged in user equal does not equal record owner. Just remember to replace {NOT EQUAL} with the appropriate syntax in expression builder.+
    Regards,
    Cam

  • How do I make PFM and Type 1 fonts available for my document?

    I am trying to work with a document in InDesign. There are some PFM and Type 1 fonts in the document that can't be found. I have them in a folder on my computer but don't know how to make them available. I downloaded Adobe Type Manager Light, but am running Windows 7 SP1 and the exe file doesn't work. I also watched a tutorial about fonts, but can't find the folder that the person was talking about in the video. Can someone help me?

    Hopefully you have not damaged Windows by trying to install ATM. Windows 7 has native T1 type support built in.
    To make them available in Windows, Presuming they are actually Windows format fonts, you would right-click the font and choose Install Font, or CS6 or CC you can put them in a folder named Document Fonts in the same directory as the .indd file, and they will be availble to that file alone.
    Note that Mac format fonts are completley useless on Windows. They're easy to spot, though -- they'll show a file size of 0 bytes in Explorer.

  • How to retrieve comments from one OfficeTask activity and use them in another OfficeTask activity for Multi level Approval sequential Workflow

    I'm designing a sequential site workflow using Visual Studio 2010 for Project Server 2010. In my case, I have following 6 stages in the workflow:
    1. InitialProposal Stage
    2. Approval Stage1 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members1
    3. Rejection Stage
    4. Approval Stage2 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members 2
    5. Execution Stage
    6. Completed Stage
    Requirement is workflow should move to Approval stage2 from Approval stage1  if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group1and it should move to Rejection Stage even if a single member rejects it.
    Workflow should move from Approval Stage2 to Execution Stage if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group2 and it should move back to Approval Stage1 on rejection by a single member of the group.
    I'm using inbuilt PSWApproval content type and OfficeTask activity for creating approval task for the group members at both stages.
    On task rejected in Approval stage2, task will be assigned again to Approval Stage1 and I want to show comments given by members of Approver Project Security Group2 to the members of Approver Project Security Group1 with this assigned task
    but I'm not able to retrieve comments from officeTask activity.
    My question is where exactly these comments are saved? how can we retrieve them and use them in another officetask activity? If this is not possible then what is the possible solution for meeting above mentioned business requirement?

    Hi Paul,
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    By comments field I'm assuming OfficeTask.Comments field. Problem is, this field is always null. I tried accessing this field in CheckExitCondition activity as well as in OnTaskCompleted but in both the cases, it was null only(I wrote comments while approving
    the task).
    I used a code activity within OnTaskCompleted activity and following code for accessing Comments and Description fields:
    public string officeComments;
            public string officeDescription;
            private void TaskCOmplete(object sender, EventArgs e)
                CodeActivity Sender = (CodeActivity)sender;
                Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask ofctask1 = ((CompositeActivity)Sender.Parent).Parent as Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask;
                officeComments = ofctask1.Comments;
                officeDescription = ofctask1.Description;          
    Please tell me if I'm doing anything wrong here, I'm very new to Workflows. Also, do I need to set any specific property of officeTask for retriving comments?
    Thank you

  • Multiple Document Types For Purchase Requisition For Different Order Types

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I want to have different document types of Purchase Requisition for different Order types.
    For Example:
    for Order Type ZT01- Document Type used should be YR01
    for Order Type YA01- Document Type used should be ZR01
    How could this be achieved?
    Regards.

    hi
    Kindly check the user exit for the same
    COZF0001 or COZF0002
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Scale type D for group conditions

    Hi all,
    I am creating a new group condition and am trying to make it scale type D - graduated-to-interval scale. However because this is a group condition, SAP is giving me an error (Scale type 'D' cannot be used for group condition 'X').
    What is the best solution to this?
    I would like to give discounts based on:
    Sales quantity:
    1-100 = 15% off
    101-200 = 25%
    201-300 = 35%
    301-400 = 45%

    Hello
    This is b'coz your condition type with active Group condition Indicator. That means, here the system calculates the basis for the scale value from more than one item in the document.
    So, the scale D maintain in Scale basis for those condition type, does not go with it and throws an Error.
    Thus, if you want to scale functionality for condition type with group condition indicators use GrpCond.routine to maintain routine.
    Routine number for creating group key identifies a routine that calculates the basis for the scale value when a group condition occurs in pricing.
    For instance.
    Check routine 3-Mat.Pricing Group. This is an example of a structure of group key formula.  A structure of group key formula can be used to influence the basis the system uses when reading the scale of a group condition.  The formula is assigned to a group condition type in customizing.
    Formula '3' adds up the quantities / values of all of the line items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group (field KONDM) as the current sales document line item.
    A company defines a particular discount (condition type Z001) with scales based on weight.  When a sales order line item is priced that is eligible for the Z001 discount, the user would like the system to read the scale with not just the weight of the current line item, but the combined weight of all items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group as the current line item.  To accomplish this, the user defines condition type Z001 as a group condition and assigns structure of group key formula '3' to it in customizing.
    I hope this assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Sales Order Unable to Use New Condition Tables for Tax Condition Type

    Dear All,
    I am currently working on SAP R/3 4.0. I have a new requirement for my tax where I need to create new condition tables other than the 4 standard SAP tables which are Customer/Material, Division/Customer, Departure Country/Destination Country, Domestic Taxes and Export Taxes. My new tables consists of Departure Country/Destination Country/Shipping Point/Tax Code. The requirement is that the tax code is based on the chosen destination country and shipping point. The problem I am facing now is that no matter what types of table I create or even I generate with reference to the standard table, the access sequence will only refer to the 4 standard SAP tables above. Even if I put my own table in the highest priority for the access sequence, the same thing happens. My sales order will only pick up date from the standard table.
    I wonder if anyone encountered the same problem as me.
    Kindly advise.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Yvonne

    Hi
    Yvonne
    I suggest fist check a simple thing ,whether u have successfully determined shipping point for each line item ,it is possible that just adding a line item will not trigger shipping point determination . So after u update the shipping point on line level u can rerun pricing and check agian if u r getting it .
    Secondly for tax purposes I suggest   Try to have Customer and material tax classification approach  this allows to u have long term flexibiliy and also reduces your maintenance activity . As if u change or add number of shipping points and business changes using the sequence of shipping point ,the logic of just using shipping point will not work.
    In Tax classification u cna add new condition table for each new tax category and use it in different access sequences.
    This information can be passed on to FI using Different Tax code for Different combination.
    I hope this helps
    Regards
    Mandar

  • How to make repricing for specific conditions at the time of billing?

    Hello
    I'm SD Pricing person. Let me ask here experts below my concern.
    In EU countries, there is recycling fee in sales of electronics or Note PC with batteries....to keep our earth clean.
    So when customers buy such products, they have to pay more as recycling fee including invoice amount.
    My question is... we want to make repricing for recycling conditions when the billing is created.
    Based on our configuration, recycling condition is not defined as a kind of tax condition.
    So this value is just copied from sales order.
    (pricing type in copy control is 'G' which means repricing for tax condition.)
    In this situation, we want to make repricing for those conditions during operating system.
    Is there any easy way to cover this?
    As I think, this is not easy because the system is already operated.
    To change condition attribution is really risky. If we dare do, we have to migrate all open orders.
    So I want to put this way to the end of my choice.
    For this requirement,
    1. We have to change condition class or category or calculation type in order to be repriced based on pricing type 'G'.
        (ex. Set the condition category as 'I' inter-billing or 'L' always repricing.)
        But transaction data are created now and all open orders will be affected.
    2. To create new conditions are not easy because these conditions are mapped to the CO-PA value field and the values are posted in FI doc.
    3. To change pricing type in copy control is almost impossible because of the impact.
    What can I do this in this situation?
    What I want to do is just to make repricing for specific conditions at the time of billing in case that pricing type of copy control is 'G'.
    Thank you in advance.

    Let me ask agagin to all experts.
    I want to make A condition to be repriced at the time of billing.
    For this, I have to set condition category as 'L' (Generally new when copying).
    But I do not want to do in that way becauuse I am maintaining big operated system now.
    In addition, though I migrate open orders after changing config. as 'L', it is almost impossible for use to migrate because we have more than a thound open orders per a DAY as Globalized system.
    That is why I am asking.
    Simply I can create new condition but as I mentioned, there are various recycling fee so we already created about 10 conditions. And this recycling conditions are linked to REA package of SAP. So creating another 10 more conditions can not be a way for us.
    At last, what I want is not to be shown this condition only in billing doc.
    'A' condition should be displayed in both Sales order and Billing doc.
    And simultaneously, when the billing is created and if user changed 'A' condition master, then new value which is different from sales order have to be reflected in billing doc.
    Thank you in advance.

  • In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

    Hi
    In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
    AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
    I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
    There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
    Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code  should not be FF because  tax code  FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
    Please help me.
    Rajendra Prasad

    Dear Rajendra,
    There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
    Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
    -->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
    -->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
    -->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

Maybe you are looking for