`make install` copies to /usr/local/bin

And /usr/local/bin is apparently not on the default arch $PATH.
This is odd becauase /usr/local/bin is the $bindir apparently for make by default.

echo 'export PATH="${PATH}:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin"' > /etc/profile.d/local-bin.sh && chmod a+x /etc/profile.d/local-bin.sh
But you really should use a PKGBUILD instead of make install so pacman can keep track of your packages in the system.

Similar Messages

Not able to see make in /usr/local/bin even after installing the package

Hi,
I have installed the package make-3.8 for solaris 9 on my machine with sun os 5.9. But still I can not see 'make' in /usr/local/bin .
Does anyone have an idea why?
I installed the same as root using the command:
pkdadd -d <packagename>
But it gives me quite many warnings like :
WARNING : /usr/local/bin/make <not present on Read only file system>
WARNING : /usr/local/bin/doc/make/ABOUT-NLS <not present on Read only file system>
At the end it says Installation of SMCmake was successful
Still I can't see make in /usr/local/bin.
Regards
Manmeet

Seems like /usr/local is mounted read-only? Run
mount | grep local
or
touch /usr/local/test
and see if you can write files in the directory.
/M.

How to put g95 in usr/local/bin?

Hi all,
I am trying to compile a program called elmerice. When I type the "make compile" command, I get the following message:
elmerf90-nosh -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/usr/local/bin/g95 -O5 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=nocona -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -falign-loops -I. -Ibinio -I/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents//share/elmersolver/include -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents/bin/elmerf90-nosh: line 18: /usr/local/bin/g95: No such file or directory
I did install (I think successfully) g95 using macports, i.e. the command "sudo port install g95" but apparently it is not in /usr/local/bin, which seems to be where elmerice wants to find it.
One complicating factor might be that /usr/local/bin does have gfortran it.
It seems like elmerice will only use g95. Can I put g95 in the /usr/local/bin directory from wherever I have it now, and if so, how? Or can I just reinstall g95 in that directory?
Thanks,

Try creating a symbolic link from /usr/local/bin/g95 to wherever MacPorts put it. That is probably the easiest solution. Ideally, you would fix the makefile, but that wouldn't be easy.

/usr/local/bin

Hello everyone,
Whenever i am installing any s/w from source by compiling,its executable is getting stored in /usr/local/bin.Now im unable to use the s/w by just typing its executable name in the terminal,its giving me an error as "command not found".what i have to do is browse to the directory /usr/local/bin n then run the executable as ./xxxxx.How can i add the directory /usr/local/bin so that it too is checked for executables.
Thanks in advance,
Rajiv Nair.

Anyway, /usr/local is made just for those things you do not want to be touched by your package manager. So, if for any reason you do not want to write a PKGBUILD for something (if e.g., it is just a little script you wrote and you want to install it system-wide; or you have some reasons to make the compilation routine step by step), then /usr/local is then just the right place: /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin for executable with various permissions, /usr/local/lib for the libraries, may be /usr/local/src for the sources, etc. Then you should just modify your /etc/profile (or your .bashrc, .zshrc).
This is not what is supported by arch, but it is something you can always do, if you like so, in any linux system of the world.

Usr/local/bin...or where?

hey guys,
I just made a package of sylpheed claws 2.00. Everything went ok, but the binary was placed in /usr/local/bin. For reasons I don't quite understand, this is not an arch-like place to be. So where should I put it, and how should I modify my pkgbuild to put it there?
btw, here's the fairly plain pkgbuild;
pkgname=sylpheed-claws
pkgver=2.0.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The stable extended version of sylpheed"
url="http://claws.sylpheed.org/"
licence=""
depends=(pkgconfig libetpan)
makedepends=()
conflicts=()
replaces=()
backup=()
install=
source=(http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sylpheed-claws/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('7ddfc626484ae0954a78c5233931e21a')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --with-gtk2
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
also, what forum should I have posted this to?
thanks!

Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
General hints -
./configure --help
will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

How do I change permisson to write on /usr/local/bin??

Hi
I'm installing a software by source (PKG-CONFIG) as needed by bluefish, however which I was doing " Make install" the terminal told me that it can't write on /usr/local/bin/pkg-config......so how do I change the permission so that I can start installing??
Thanks
Chris

Precede the install command with "sudo" and use your password (provided you are an admin). Then the insatller will have permission to write as if you are the "root" user.
eg:
$ sudo install
will run "install" as if run by root - who does have permission to write to the dir.
MacBook (BootCamp), various Macs and servers Mac OS X (10.4.7)

10g SuSE asks for /usr/local/bin

The 10g runInstaller program is asking me for the local bin directory. Oracle then proceeds to install some binaries there.
It prompts me with
/usr/local/bin so I have thus far put them here. But I am wondering if the the oracle user's bin (unix user account)i.e. /home/oracle/bin would be better as later linux patches might remove/damage these files.
Any opinions?
regards
Ben

I wouldn't worry too much about those files : oracle user already has them it its $ORACLE_HOME/bin directory.
Anyway, you could make a copy of them before installing any other Oracle product. The files copied in /usr/local/bin are normally oraenv, coraenv and dbhome.

OK to create /usr/local/bin?

Hi,
I tried today to install the command line utility for Growl, growlnotify. The installer script failed because it tried to install into /usr/local/bin which isn't there currently.
Now, is it OK to just go ahead and run "mkdir /usr/local/bin" to create the directory? I am not very experienced with Unix so I usually don't touch the unix directories so that I don't mess up anything...
Thanks!
Ingo

If you are the only or primary user of your computer, and you want to mess around, /usr/local is as good a place as any, since most software installs in it by default. Another option is to do stuff in your home directory.
If you have a dumb installer or Makefile that tries to install and possibly over-write files in say /usr/bin, you would be tipped off by install permission failure, whereas if you issued "sudo make install" you are at the mercy of whomever wrote the Makefile.
I actually build stuff in my home directory and install it into root-owned /usr/local, and the first time I issue "make -i install" I do it without write permissions and I can watch where it tries to put stuff. That is excessively paranoid. But its when you stop being paranoid.
Anyway, it doesn't much matter. For security reasons on a multiuser system, it is best to have multi-user accessed executables in root-owned directories.

Accessing /usr/local/bin directory

I'm new to Unix and trying to access the directories /usr/local/bin and usr/local/lib to put files into that I need to run a program, but Terminal keeps telling me "no such file or directory." I am doing this work on my own computer, but do I need special permission to access these files?
Any advice on moving the files into these directories?

Usually, files get into /usr/local when you run "configure && make && sudo make install". Since you're new, I would suggest running "configure", "make", and "sudo make install" separately until you get the hang of it.

GTKlxsplit's makefile wiped my /usr/local/bin/

Alright, right now I'm feeling stupid and raped. but hey! At least I have a funny story to tell
One trusts, that someone that can make a gtk front-end for a terminal application can also make a simple makefile.
It doesn't seem to be the case.
I have some .001 .002... files and since with cat we need to find, then sort, then cat it, I decided to try lxsplit and it's simple gtk gui
Well, no configure file... that's ok since the application seems to be really simple.
make is only one line and returns ok. The binary file on the current folder seems to work, so let's make install it! No error, only one line, that's ok for me... let's try running it.
gtk<tab>... nothing. gtklx<tab>... still nothing.
Let's see where make install put it:
# make install
cp -f gtklxsplit /usr/local/bin
Ok maybe /usr/local/bin isn't in $PATH... wait a minute, /usr/local/bin?!!!!
Ok, just great, now I have a bin file on /usr/local instead of a bin folder!
Ok, make uninstall then edit Makefile: /usr/local/bin to /usr/bin/
Now make and make install.
gtklx<tab>... gtklxsplit! nice program runs fine... join... select file... "join" -> Segmentation fault!
Ok, useless... make uninstall.
some seconds later... wtf: yao<tab>... nothing!
ls /usr/bin
ls: cannot access /usr/bin: No such file or directory
Ok, just won the lottery!
I just have to find a way to commemorate! I still have firefox, pidgin, xterm and pcmanfm running until I close them It's gonna be a hell of a party!
Last edited by VuDu (2008-08-27 23:25:23)

Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
General hints -
./configure --help
will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

/usr/local/bin vs /usr/bin and Kazehakase vs Firefox

When you install an application to /usr/bin will it be more faster than installed on /usr/local/bin?
I have Firefox installed in /usr/bin and Kazehakase installed to /usr/local/bin. And it seems that Firefox is faster than Kazehakase. Why?
Last edited by Paingiver (2008-03-15 11:11:48)

dyscoria wrote:
Endperform wrote:The notion that an application can be sped up by linking it in your home directory, or even renaming it to one letter is also crazy. Your install will search for an executable in the path specified in $PATH and then execute the first instance it finds, but this does NOT speed the application itself up.
No seriously, if you rename all your executables to one letter then your system runs like lightning!
* am i really that bad at sarcasm? *
Yes, since there was no indication of sarcasm in your post. A or would have worked

How to change /usr/bin/grep To /usr/local/bin/grep

Hi
I have installed GNU Grep but when I am giving the command #which grep it is showing me solaris grep i.e /usr/bin/grep.
My question is how do I change it to /usr/local/bin/
Thanks in advance
Sukrut

You have a few options:
1) place /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your PATH environment variable
2) remove /usr/bin/grep altogether
3) move /usr/bin/grep to something else (ie: /usr/bin/solaris/grep) and symlink /usr/bin/grep to /usr/local/bin/grep just in case any hard coded programs/scripts rely on /usr/bin/grep being present.
I prefer step #3 since most of the various gnu utilities are virtually 100% drop-in replacements.

How do I add /usr/local/bin to path

Hi.
I have installed arch linux on a server.
It seems really very good - manged to install latest snort-inline easily...
However (and this is really a completely NOOB question)
- how do I add /usr/local/bin to the default (root) path ?
I have tried to add
PATH=/usr/local/bin
to /etc/enviornment
But it did not show up when using the - env command (after re-logging in)
I know that I could sym link to /usr/bin but i would like to know.
Any help would be good
Cheers
Last edited by yossarianuk (2008-10-02 10:31:21)

There's a place for all three of /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, and ~/bin --- even on Arch.
If you download package whizbang-1.2.3 from some non-Arch site, its installer will often by default try to install its files into the /usr/local hierarchy. When making a PKGBUILD, you want to tell it instead to install into $pkgdir/usr, so that when you install the resulting pkg file with pacman, it goes into the /usr hierarchy. That's what the wiki page is saying: pacman-managed stuff goes into the /usr hierarchy.
/usr/local/* is for files you want to install systemwide without making a PKGBUILD. Your own scripts are a great example. Also you might want to install some compiled files that way, if making a PKGBUILD isn't worth it or you don't have the time to write (*and maintain!*) one.
~/bin is for scripts (could be compiled files too) that you want to only be available to that specific user.

Script to start an app in /usr/local/bin

I am new to trying AppleScript. I use gnupg and want to start an app called "gpg-agent" located in /usr/local/bin/ . I want to pass it an arg, something like --daemon and maybe another ... first I want to see if it is even running ...
But when I compile, AppleScript prompts me to locate gpg-agent. That browse function only lists certain folders and never hidden nor /usr/ ....
Any help please?

Oy!
well, golly ...no, just wanna scribble something to make my gpg work for encryption. Need to get something started outside the program. Scfripting sounded nice since I didn't really want to do C++
where's a good forum.
thanks for the patience

Question about /usr/local/bin in Mavericks ...

I just did a clean install of Mavericks on a 2010 MacPro. I understand Mavericks does not replicate this path (/usr/local/bin) when doing a clean install. Prior to this I was running 10.7.xx and I had a few compiled binaries installed in the bin folder. How do I address this? Can I simply recreate the path manually without risk?
Thanks.
-paul.

etresoft The 905
Re: Question about /usr/local/bin in Mavericks ...
Jan 15, 2014 9:30 AM (in response to Paul Figgiani)
So why would you expect /usr/local/bin to be there? If you install custom, low-level software like this on one system, it will not get migrated to the new system.
As I stated in my original post I did not expect it to be there. All I'm asking is how do I adreess the issue? Do I recreate it manually without any risk of screwing something up?

`make install` copies to /usr/local/bin

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for