Make version cue open source

I know it's a long shot. But any chance that adobe will release version cue cs4 as open source or maybe the sdk?
Cheers,
Ben

Install SharePoint Foundation on your Windows 7 PC (it will need to be 64-bit OS). The setup is a little complicated but okay once you get it set up. There are also some tricks to set up using non-domain accounts.
Also be sure to install SQL Server Express first and do a "Farm" install (not "Stand-alone"). Use the "with tools" package of SQL Server to get Management Studio.
With Visual Studio Express you won't have all the deployment bells and whistles, and you will have to set up your project items by hand, but you can still build your .wsp.
If you are going to release a commercial product you will need to test deploying it to a SharePoint farm built on Windows Server 2008 at some stage, obviously.

Similar Messages

Versions of Open Source components in 10.6 Server?

Is there a list somewhere of the versions of Open Source components in 10.6 server (e.g. postfix, jabberd, etc.)?

http://www.opensource.apple.com/release/mac-os-x-106/

Make a SharePoint open source project at home

his is a relatively small project, which I don't expect to take more than 4 hours of coding (at most), which should result in a WSP, which I hope to host in an open-source site.
I can't use my company's resources for my own project (and prefer not to) - but that leaves me without a SharePoint environment, and with Visual Studio Express...

Install SharePoint Foundation on your Windows 7 PC (it will need to be 64-bit OS). The setup is a little complicated but okay once you get it set up. There are also some tricks to set up using non-domain accounts.
Also be sure to install SQL Server Express first and do a "Farm" install (not "Stand-alone"). Use the "with tools" package of SQL Server to get Management Studio.
With Visual Studio Express you won't have all the deployment bells and whistles, and you will have to set up your project items by hand, but you can still build your .wsp.
If you are going to release a commercial product you will need to test deploying it to a SharePoint farm built on Windows Server 2008 at some stage, obviously.

Open Source Final Cut Server

It would make sense to open source Final Cut Server instead of discontinuing it. Many depend on it and have massive asset libraries and workflows that will not be moving any time and need support. QuickTime/Darwin Streaming Server is open source and thriving. Final Cut Server should be given that chance as it still has many uses and a lot of potential in areas that Apple hasn't explored.
Apple please give back to community of loyal users and pro's around the world by open sourcing Final Cut Server and not letting it sit on the shelf like Shake collecting dust when it could be so much more!

I agree with this. We have invested too much to simply abandon our infrastructure and explore other options. Open source would be in everyone's best interest. I encourage you to visit the FCSvr feedback page and recommend this. http://www.apple.com/feedback/finalcutserver.html. Please be constructive - there has been enough temper tantrums and gripes about FCSvr being killed and the new way the FCPX works. Please be detailed about how you use FCSvr, any customization you've done, especially if they involve using the command line tools and scripting in any form. I personally have invested countless hours pouring over bash scripts, scouring the 43 "px" tables in the postgres database looking for ways to improve our setup, and writing libraries of functions to make scripting easy. I figured out how to customize our distribution to make it do what we need it to do, to serve our business and our clients. If the road ends here, was that all for nothing? FCSvr is a great product. I know that it doesn't jive with FCPX new ways of thinking. I know FCPX has range keywording and metadata capabilities. But what of a notification system? What of a transcoding server? What of subscription/responses triggering actions like archiving to tape? What about support for changing metadata with third party solutions? What about publishing the catalog to online services like MediaSilo? There are countless functions that have become part of the workflow of professional production companies. FCSvr has totally changed the way we work and think about our assets. I was just beginning to get somewhere with our producers and editors, and I really don't want to stop now. Open sourcing FCSvr would give developers the opportunity to write their own modules for FCSvr, we could see support for all kinds of functionality. It's not going to happen though if you don't tell them you need it. Send your feedback using the feedback page. Talk to the vendor you bought FCSvr from or the person who installed it in your organization and encourage them to have this discussion with the people at Apple who can make a difference. Please take action, don't just gripe and make broad stroke suggestions here on the forum. Thanks for your time.

Open source driver for wrt1900ac?

It is not possible to compile a fully working (including WiFi) OpenWrt build for the WRT1900AC. At this point anyway.
For those who want to use OpenWRT, will the use of a closed source component be required indefinitely or is work happening to make a full open source release?

The best way to get immediate information would be to directly contact Linksys on the phone and talk to some one at level 2 or higher support to see if any information will be given. Company intentions are not usually given since thats probably company confidential. Linksys or most Mfrs never directly post in forums unless it's something specific and even then, forum Admins post this information. They may or may not be looking in forums aswell. You could ask the forums Admins on here to see if they can get some information as well. Most users on here don't have this kind of information and we can only speculate. The best place for correct information would be directly with Linksys or with OpenWRT.
Good Luck.

New open source webmail available

This morning AtMail has released a new version, an open source version. This is a true open source project and will be a great improvement over the existing horde and squirrel mail packages. The interface is based off of their existing simple ajax interface and has been under development in the corporate arena for a couple of years now. You can find the full details on the AtMail Blog (http://blog.atmail.com).

Great tool, thanks a lot for sharing it.
Installed it and built "Hello, world" extension, now trying to convert my existing extension project for this. Packaging CS5 / CS6 versions alone is priceless.
Maybe a dumb question, but is it possible to switch .json and output name in command line? I have extension with 5 different versions, they have different licenses etc., so it would be great to type
csxs package config1.json extension1.zxp
csxs package config2.json extension2.zxp
and so on? I'd put it all into one .sh script
sorry if it's all already available and I just missed this part in documentation

How to make Open Source work on Solaris 10, x86 ?

I'm trying to make this Open Source code for MDBTools work on my
Solaris 10, x86.
What this tool does is to read in a Microsoft Access MDB file, and
outputs the contents of that database file, into an ASCII text file.
I unzipped these files already, but how do I make "mdbtools" work on
Solaris x86, version 10?
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=mdbtools
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdbtools/files/mdbtools/mdbtools-0.6pre1.tar.gz/download

checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
checking for gpp... no
checking for aCC... no
checking for CC... no
checking for cxx... no
checking for cc++... no
checking for cl... no
checking for FCC... no
checking for KCC... no
checking for RCC... no
checking for xlC_r... no
checking for xlC... no
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
checking for g77... no
checking for f77... no
checking for xlf... no
checking for frt... no
checking for pgf77... no
checking for fl32... no
checking for af77... no
checking for fort77... no
checking for f90... no
checking for xlf90... no
checking for pgf90... no
checking for epcf90... no
checking for f95... no
checking for fort... no
checking for xlf95... no
checking for lf95... no
checking for g95... no
checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no
checking whether accepts -g... no
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 262144
checking command to parse /usr/ccs/bin/nm -p output from gcc object... ok
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for ar... false
checking for ranlib... :
checking for strip... :
checking if gcc static flag works... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... solaris2.10 ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
configure: creating libtool
appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
libtool.m4: error: problem compiling CXX test program
checking for g++ option to produce PIC...
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... no
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... solaris2.10 ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no
appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for yywrap in -lfl... no
checking for yywrap in -ll... yes
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking limits.h usability... yes
checking limits.h presence... yes
checking for limits.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking wordexp.h usability... yes
checking wordexp.h presence... yes
checking for wordexp.h... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking Are we using flex ... yes
checking for SQLGetPrivateProfileString in -lodbcinst... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.4.1)
checking for libglade-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0... yes
checking GNOME_CFLAGS... -DORBIT2=1 -mt -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -I/usr/sfw/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0
checking GNOME_LIBS... -mt -lglade-2.0 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lmlib -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lresolv -lnsl -lsocket -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0
checking gtk-doc version >= 1.0... yes
checking for initscr in -lncurses... no
checking for add_history in -lreadline... no
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: creating libmdb.pc
config.status: creating libmdbsql.pc
config.status: creating src/util/Makefile
config.status: creating src/extras/Makefile
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating include/Makefile
config.status: creating src/libmdb/Makefile
config.status: creating src/sql/Makefile
config.status: creating src/odbc/Makefile
config.status: creating doc/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/gladefiles/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/pixmaps/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/help/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/help/C/Makefile
config.status: creating mdbtools.spec
config.status: creating include/mdbver.h
config.status: creating include/config.h
config.status: include/config.h is unchanged
config.status: executing depfiles commands
@

Version Cue CS3 not working. Photoshop not opening.

Hello,
I have just installed Adobe Creative Suite 3 Design Standard on my new MacBook Pro. I have activated it. However when i start Version Cue CS3 and check for updates i get the message "No Internet connection. Please check your Internet settings and /or firewall. Waiting for connection...". I have turned off my firewall and the antivirus program and I still cannot get it to work.
I also cannot start Photoshop CS3. When I open the application a blank window titled "Adobe Design Suit Standard CS3" appears as well as Photoshop toolbars which I cannot select. All the options on the toolbar is greyed out and I cannot select any of them. I have to force quit the application.
What am I doing wrong?
Any help is much appreciated.
Thank you.

This forum is for Premiere Pro... you might ask in forums for those products
If you go to the Forums Index http://forums.adobe.com/index.jspa
You will be able to select a forum for the Adobe product(s) you use
When you find a correct forum, below is the KIND of information you need to provide
-PPro Information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840
-Premiere Elements FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1042180

Photoshop CS3 crashes on File Open (related to Version Cue)

Hi all,
I found some threads on PS crashing on file opening, but none of these were describing my issue, nor were the suggested fixes working.
Here is what happens:
PS opens fine. I can open a file in PS if I open it from Bridge (or Explorer). If I select 'File > Open' in the PS menu however, the open file dialog attempts to open, but hangs and that's it. I can not escape out of it, and if I click close in the system tray it says PS is 'Not Responding' and sends an error message to Microsoft.
This is what fixes it:
In 'preferences' - if I disable Version Cue, Photoshop works perfectly again. Only thing is, I need to use Version Cue!
Anybody else have this issue? Any ideas for fixes???
Thanks all,
Anne

Memory address issues can be tough to track down. Often, they will occur when a program either mis-reports the memory addresses used, or tells the OS that it has released them, when it has not.
Though written with video editing in mind, there still might be some tips for setting up your computer, in this ARTICLE. If you have Win7, please look down-thread for Black Viper's tuning page.
Now, Adobe programs have always been great at reporting their memory usage, but it could still happen - I've just never encountered it over the decades.
Good luck,
Hunt

A plea to Adobe: Make Homesite open source

I know this won't go anywhere, but I need to ask anyway.
Please please please, make Homesite open source.
I have tried other editors over the years but I come back to
HS every time. Macromedia ignored Homesite when they bought
Allaire, now Adobe is ignoring it after buying Macromedia. Homesite
is a wonderful code editor, but it needs some tender loving care
after being ignored for years.
Keep it commercial, it doesn't have to be free. But please,
open up the source. Let the few of us that still use it make it
better.
Steve Nelson

I just love seeing replies here!
I finally broke down and got CS4 and included Dreamweaver based on user groups saying in code view it is *almost* like Homesite.
argh... the ambiguity of *almost*...
a horse is almost like a giraffe...
I still have homesite installed... there is NOTHING like HOMESITE!
Hand coders do not want all the bells and whistles of Dreamweaver!!!!!
Hey maybe APPLE would buy it!
I don't think it ever worked on MAC but maybe they could make a cross platform and make it run on both!
OPENSOURCE would be really awesome though!
Anybody know anyone at Cisco? now that they have openoffice maybe they would like to fund Homesite!
Homesite to me is the OpenOffice of the web dev world.
OR maybe the folks that have CSE Validator...

Help! Can't open files in all programs since installing version cue upgrade

Please help. A few days ago I got some pop up (I'm in windows XP) saying updates were available for 2 adobe things. I just chose yes and kept working. Now, I can't open files in any of my CS3 programs. I have lost 4 days of productivity and fear losing my mind next!! after doing some research, it appears alot of people are having trouble since uploading some version cue upgrade for cs3. I followed their suggestions and unchecked VC in photoshop (my first offender) and suddenly I could open files again. But now I can't in Illustrator, but in preferences, it does not have VC checked.
I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling the whole package. I've tried just uninstalling VC. Nothing's working and I'm having major deadline problems now.
Please, please help! Thanks.
Anne

You can try a system restore to a point before the update. If you're lucky, it might work, but I often find System Restore will fail when you need it the most.
Peter

Open source / Commercial version, it's up to you! Why not for ESB products

Please comment this forum and help us to get Sun's support for Open ESB as we can get it for open-Solaris or Glassfish.
Thanks
Paul
Extract from
http://www.pymma.com/eng/People/Blog-Paul-Perez-Chief-Architect
Jonathan Schwartz new policy
Few years ago, Jonathan Schwartz replaced Scott McNealy as SUN Microsystems CEO. Swartz's first decision was to convert Sun into an Open-Source company. Consequently, Solaris OS, Application Servers and even the Java language were opened and their sources published. At present, Sun is viewed as a major Open Source actor.
Sun�s new sales philosophy proposes, on one hand, its best products in an open-source format and on the other hand, commercial support and hardware. The best examples of this new philosophy are Open-Solaris and Glassfish. You can download these products, use them and test them. After you have built applications with these tools and wish to move into a production environment, you can buy support from Sun.
Open source or Commercial version, it's up to you!
Alternatively, you can as well buy commercial versions at the first place. Even if open sources and commercial versions are slightly different than the open-source ones, more than 95% of their code is originated from the same development branch. Example : SUN proposes its queue messaging system with two similar versions, respectively named �SUN QM� and "Open-MQ". The only difference is the amount you pay for the technical support.
Everyone can find advantages in this sales policy on Sun products: companies and developers try and develop for free and can rely on Sun support in production. As a matter of fact, Sun uses these �free� products as Trojan horses to conquer new market shares, penetrate new companies and sell Sun hardware.
Why not for ESB Products ?
Unfortunately, there is a small issue in this picture: Sun's ESB platform is the exception in this sales policy. In Fact, Sun proposes two different tools for ESB developments. The first product. "JCAPS", is a commercial product inherited from Seebeyond. The second product, "Open-ESB" is based on JBI specifications (JSR 208) and was developed from scratch about 2 years ago.
Alas, JCAPs and Open-ESB are definitely two different products.
JCAPS ignores JBI specifications
JCAPS connectors are based on JCA specifications and not on JBI.
Open-ESB development process is based on Web services specifications, JCAPS not.
JCAPS and Open-ESB developments are not compatible.
Hundreds other differences can be found between the two products.
We can understand that for a while, for technical, marketing or business reasons, a company supports more than one product lines with the same functionalities. IBM does it and Oracle buying BEA will do it also.
However, there are several things that Pymma would like to understand:
Why the download of JCAPS is only available for authorized JCAPS Partner ?
Why SUN does not provide support for open-ESB as it does for Glassfish, Open Solaris or Open MQ ?
Why JBI or Open-ESB are never mentioned at most ESB seminars organized by Sun Centres in the UK ?
Why Sun marketing, Gurus or consultants are prolix about JBI in the public lectures and technical forums, and at the same ignore Open-ESB when they advice companies ?
Is the policy of Jonathan Swartz policy only applicable for Java Legacy applications (Application Server, Message queuing�)? not for ESB tools ?
Of course, we already asked these questions to SUN but we never got clear answers.
Thanks for clarifying Sun's position
Many companies believe in JBI and their developers spend time and energy working on Open-ESB . These companies would certainly be interested to hear Sun's explanations on the above questions. They probably want to be sure that Open-ESB will not be just a prototype for the new JCAP version (only reserved for SUN JCAPS Partners). They certainly want to be credible by proposing SUN's professional support on Open-ESB as they do for Glassfish and Open-Solaris. After, they only need from SUN to clarify its position and give a clear prospective for the future of JBI and Open-ESB. We hope that through this blog Sun will hear us and we will give us clear answers.

Hi Leonie,
My iPhoto is iPhoto 11, version 9.4.2. I believe my Aperture is the latest version but I don't know how to verify that when I can't open it. I regularly accept any updates.
How I restored my Aperture Library: I opened Aperture, clicked on Time Machine, and navigated to the Aperture Library that had been backed-up earlier in the day. It took a while to restore.
When done, I opened Aperture (yes, at that point I could still open it). It opened up on the still-empty Library, and I had to manually change it to the restored library, every time I opened aperture after that. This was annoying, so, I then went to FINDER and deleted the empty Library. I probably shouldn't have done this; I noticed it had the words "current default" in its filename.
From that point on, FINDER shows the restored aperture library (actually two restored aperture libraries, since I accessed Time Machine a second time to restore an even older backed-up version) but of course, not the empty Library that had had "default" in its filename. And... I can no longer open Aperture.
Hope you can help me, thanks so much,
Glensdaughter

JAVA ME version Open Source

Hi,
I am new to JAVA technology. I want to use open source version of JAVA ME along with CDC1.1 and FP1.1.
Can you please provide me links to download these open source packages. I am planning to cross compile and use it on Linux.
I hope I can download this from ORACLE website and use this code as open source code. Is this correct?
Thanks & Regards,
Tushar

How about this ?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javasebusiness/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javame-419430.html#MIDP-2.0-OTH-G-F
Actually, all Open source you can download from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/platform?listBy=1&listByType=platform
If you just want to use CDC 1.1 and FP1.1 in ARM platform, you can download OJEC from
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/embedded/downloads/javame/index.html
Regards,
Xunliao

LiveView: Make it 'open source' for the benefit of all

First, let me start by saying LiveView is a great concept. However...
SonyEricsson needs more than just a great concept to make this a useful and successful product.
At present, it is horrendous and they should be embarrassed with releasing this device to the market in its current state.
The hardware is average but the software/firmware is absolutely awful, leading to an extremely unreliable / barely useful device.
My experiences since receiving my LiveView have not been dissimilar to the rest of the users who have seen frequent disconnections / lockups / non-working features.
It is clear that there is interest in this device from the Android Community / Xda-Developers, etc. with many members keen to resolve LiveView's issues themselves - yet they are limited by a closed platform. Given Engadget's review of the LiveView, SonyEricsson's poor track record of providing continued support / updates to their products and their statement that there will be no updates issued for the device - I would think it not inappropriate to demand that an update at least be made to make the software entirely open source, or firmware/code released with a vehicle/drivers for updating.
I'm sure if the community were given the freedom, they could make the software reliable, customisable and perhaps even define innovative new ways to use the hardware.
If that happens, there's increased interest in the community which in turn would lead to more sales.
SonyEricsson, why not leverage the benefit of a willing (and free) workforce that are more interested in improving your device than you are?
(TLDR) In short, SE's failure to provide a fully functioning reliable product combined with their lack of commitment to continued support has paved the way for a global community of very tech savvy individuals and groups, willing to devote their time freely to improving LiveView. I say to SonyEricsson, let them - everyone wins.
To other customers, would you support making LiveView open source?
If so - let SonyEricsson know here and by submitting an e-Mail via their Support site (for UK, where SE's global management team is based):http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/common/contact/contactusemail/accessories?cc=gb&lc=en

Once there is a successor model, I would welcome it very much if the source code is released, and the owner of the MN800 can finally use their device.

CS4 and Yosemite: Version Cue error message when opening photo

I recently installed Yosemite and now my Photoshop CS4 gives me the following error message when I try and open a photo, WHY? and how can I fix it?
/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Adobe Version Cue CS4/Client/4.0.0/VersionCue.framework

Answer is in this post:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=13205746#13205746
Just delete the corrupted movie.

Make version cue open source

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for