Mapping  error for larger messages

HI,
My senario is File to File with some conditions ( Conditions are written in UDF )
When i am executing the payload with small size mapping executes correctly .
But when i am executing with larger payload Mapping executes but not taking any conditions in UDF , It executes as one-one mapping.
thanks in advance

HI
This should not be the case... if your UDF is working fine for smaller payload then it should work for larger payload also..
- test mapping by using payload and after that in mapping use display queue wherever you have used UDF and try to to see what is input and what is the output.. and this will give you clear idea about what exactly is going on..
- I guess something wrong with logic which you have used in UDF or is input payload dependent, so try to use display queue to get clear idea about UDF working.,.
Thanks,
Bhupesh

Similar Messages

  • IBaseMessage.Context getting disposed for large message processing (There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: Reason: Cannot access a disposed object. Object name: 'MessageContext'.

    Hi,
    I am trying to parse a large message (2.7 MB file) in a custom Flat file Disassembler (inherited from the Microsoft.BizTalk.Component.FFDasmComp) this does exactly the same work for FFDasmComp but also promotes the count of disassembled messsages. This
    works fine for small messages but for large messages I get this error
    There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: "<pipeline name>, <Pipeline assembly>" Source: "Custom FlatFile Disassembler" Receive Port: "ReceivePort7" URI: "<the input file location>" Reason: Cannot access a disposed object.
    Object name: 'MessageContext'.
    In the event log
    what I am doing inside the custom flat file assembly is, I am saving all the disassembled messages in a List<IBaseMessage> and then finally when GetNext() method returns null I am promoting the nRecordCount in the messageContext of all the disassembled
    messages. This is where I get the error when trying to promote to the message context.(Cannot access a disposed object, Object name: 'MessageContext'). I think the messagecontext is getting disposed, but it should not as I still hold its reference in
    the List<IBaseMEssage);
    private long nRecordCount = 0;
    private List<IBaseMessage> oDisassembledMessages = new List<IBaseMessage>();
    Any idea why this happens ?
    Thanks in advance, PLEASE HELP
    Surya

    Hi Surya,
    Are you still facing this issue? and are you using Flat File Disassembler in your Receive pipeline?
    If yes then set 'RecoverableInterchangeProcessing' to True.
    Please have a look in below articles-
    BizTalk
    Pipeline - Flat File Disassembler Cannot Access a Disposed Object 'DataReader'
    biztalk-esb-toolkitflat-file-debatching
    BizTalk
    Server: List of Errors and Warnings, Causes, and Solutions
    This issue can also occur if you are using Large Size message, in this case you will have to optimize your code.
    Thanks,
    Prashant
    Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

  • ABAP Mapping for Large Messages

    Hi Folks,
    We are exploring different options for dealing with the fact that XI will choke on very large messages/files. One of the options that we are considering is a third party tool that bypasses XI. However, we've just learned that it may be possible to solve the large message problem by using ABAP Mapping, because supposedly, by doing so, one would bypass the large message being converted to XML as it comes into XI. The scenario involves messages coming into XI on their way to SAP R/3. Does the ABAP Mapping option appear to be viable to you experienced folks out there?
    Thanks
    Nic

    Hey
    tunneling as per the term is used mainly for IDOC but we use the term bypass to implement the same concept but with other interfaces.
    see if u have simple 1-1 mapping then u can do a bypass scenario in which u are not doing anything in IR,u simple do the configurations in ID.
    you can not drastically increase the performance just by choosing some specific mapping.mappin is not made for this .
    for best performance you can design a bypass JDBC to IDOC scenario(but then you wont be able to do any message mapping.
    have a look at the following for bypass scenario
    /people/william.li/blog/2006/09/08/how-to-send-any-data-even-binary-through-xi-without-using-the-integration-repository
    if u want to do message mapping then design a JDBC to Proxy scenario.
    proxy is mainly used to enhance performance and would be the best bet for u i guess
    Thanx
    Aamir suhail
    Message was edited by:
            Aamir Suhail

  • Mapping error for file scenario.

    Hi ,
    I am working with the help of this scenario to pick only selected files.
    /people/mickael.huchet/blog/2006/09/18/xipi-how-to-exclude-files-in-a-sender-file-adapter
    I am getting error in mapping . Everything i have checked its correct . Mapping is correct . but still its giving error . how can i solve it .
    Error : RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~
    Thanks ,
    Syed.

    Dear Syed Kumar
    Based on the blog you are executing the scenario I guess. The scenario is clearly focusing on the picking up the files using the mask attribute in File Access Parameters.
    As you mentioned clearly, that you are getting mapping error plz concentrate on how to rectify the mapping errors.
    will guide to do so.
    1. Go to SXMB_MONI and in the integration server and check for the message you are trying send.( I hope you did this)
    2. As it is giving you mapping error, Double click onthe message Flag showing red.
    3.Plz check the Payload XML content copy that content and paste in the message mapping Test section of IR.
    4. Execute the Test. If you get the message at the receiver side there shouldn't be any error.
    If you still get the error let me know.
    Best of Luck
    Reward Points If found use ful.
    Edited by: Praveen Kurni on Jun 13, 2008 7:43 AM
    Do the Interface mapping test as well if you are successful in message mapping.

  • BPM Mapping error in SXI_MONITOR  Message scheduled on outbound side.

    When I try to process this message i get an error.
    Message scheduled on outbound side.
    I am using a BPM.
    MI_Source -> MI_Receive_BPM -> MI_TRANS1_BPM -> MI_TRANS2_BPM -> MI_TARGET
    Using EOIO in the send step Queue Name: cases
    If I remove MI_TRANS2_BPM the message reaches the bpm, but with both transformation in the BPM the message gets an error in the queue where I get a green flag 'Message Scheduled on the outbound side"
    This BPM was working on Friday but hasn't worked since. There have been no changes to the my development XI environment.  
    Some things that i have tried: Clearing the Queues (smq2), Redoing the entire scenario, clearing cpa cache.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Chirag

    Hi,
    MI_Source -> MI_Receive_BPM -> MI_TRANS1_BPM -> MI_TRANS2_BPM -> MI_TARGET
    Any specific need to have the above design pattern....you can also try:
    MI_Receive_BPM -> MI_TRANS_BPM -> MI_TARGET
    You can use the message that you initially receive and apply all the necessary transformation on it and the map it to the target structure....
    As you mentioned that if you remove MI_TRANS2_BPM your message is executed successfully...it means that the BPM transformation 2 is waiting for some event / Message....
    If you need to go by the same design then you can follow the below steps to resolve the problem:
    1) Check the return code of BPM in SXI_CACHE...it should be 0
    2) Check for any errored instance of your BPM in SWWL (as mentioned in above posts)
    3) Open the corresponding Queue and see for the messages stuck in the Queue....your Queue may be blocked....your BPM will be using a particular Queue and if any message is stuck in the Queue then all the messages that follow will get stuck in the Queue....
    Now if it is only your BPM that is using this particular Queue then Delete the Queue (applicable to development environment....do not try in QA or Production environment)
    4) In SXMB_MONI click on "PE" and open the Graphic Flow to see where actually your BPM has failed (possible only if the message has entered the BPM.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Message Mapping error:  RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation

    Hi,
    Being new to XI, I am struglling to sort out a basic mapping error. Appreciate if you could help out.
    Its an File->XI->R/3 scenario.
    My FCC successfully reads the File and creates an XML. However this XML is not transferred to the target XML structure which is exactly same except the root element name is different at top.
    I tried various forum tips but I still am getting the error.
    ( When I Test the Message mapping in test mode..it seems fine, however if I copy the XML from SXMB_MONI, it then throws the above error)
    I looked at the MM in text mode: below is the extract
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/SOURCE=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/SOURCE=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/DESTINATION=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/DESTINATION=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/MESSAGE_ID=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/MESSAGE_ID=
    As seen the name space in both starts with nS0 and end of each line has '=' sign. Is that ok.
    I have run out of options and dont know , whats the problem. Please help.
    The target and Source XML structures are exactly same as shown below
    MT_REQUEST                                 MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP
       |__MSG_HEADER                            |__MSG_HEADER  
         |__SOURCE                                |__SOURCE
         |__DESTINATION                           |__DESTINATION
         |__MESSAGE_ID                            |__MESSAGE_ID
    And the SXMB_MONI Trace shows the following error
    <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation:
    Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP.
    Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at ..
    Thanks
    Shirin
    Edited by: Shirin K on May 29, 2008 10:29 AM

    Hi Prakasu,
    As structure are exactly same, I have done 1:1 mapping. So all the fields in target structure are mapped, so no field has beeen left.
    In this structure, I do not have any 1:n relation. So 1:1 mapping should be fine.
    Apart from this could teher be any other reason.
    Regards
    Rajiv

  • Mapping Error - Dump source message to file adapter comm channel

    Hi
    Does anyone know of a way to dump the source message to a file adapter comm channel if - and only if - the message fails during mapping. For example, we receive a message from a trading partner that lacks an element that is mandatory during the mapping. When the mapping fails, the source message is sent - as is - to a file adapter comm channel.
    I don't need anything more than the source message i.e. no need for any errors etc... to be included.
    The kicker.. I would like to do this without using BPM if at all possible.
    Any ideas greatly appreciated. Thx, Duncan

    Hey Ram,
    Go to Integration Directory and open the Receiver Determination for your scenario.
    Check the configured receiver services. They are in a table-like area in the middle of the screen.
    In this table of configured receiver services for that particular Sender Service/Interface, you should have the system that normally receives that message (your ERP or any other application system) and the service that contains the receiver file comm channel that will receive the message in case of error.
    Check help.sap.com for help on condition editor on receiver determinations.
    Now, the issue. You can only check whether a field exists, you can't check whether it doesn't exist (There's only a "EXIST" operator, and no negative operator). Thus, you can only do the following: always send messages to File, but you can avoid messages that dont have field from being sent to App System. Yeah, that sucks...
    But don't fear, young padawan! There is a possible workaround. =D
    In your message mapping, do the following for that particular field:
    If field exists (check with Exist and IF standard functions) just bypass the field. Else, map the field with an impossible value (like string "$CREATED$"). Then, in your receiver determination, you will do the following conditions:
    for App System: If field =/= $CREATED$
    for File Receiver: If field = $CREATED$
    Now, if the field doesnt exist, it will have value $CREATED$, thus the message will be sent to File and not to App System. If the field exists, the message will be sent to App and not to File.
    Try that out.
    Regards,
    Henrique.

  • Mapping error for MessageSplit

    Hello,
                I am getting mapping error when i tried the scenario MessageSplit using BPM.Could somebody guide me in this context
    Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure i have followed this blog, but during mapping i have created mapping using createIF node functions when i test the mapping i am getting the below error as cannot produce target element check the source xml instance, i am newbie to this world.
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    Check the transformation step again and check this thread An empty container element
    Also try to post one question per thread. Close the thread once you get the reply for the original one.
    Thanks!

  • Idoc error mapping error for segment "E1EDT13 006" in DESADV idoc

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    DESADV IDOC for few articles is not getting passed from SAP to legacy system. It is missing one segment"E1EDT13 006" for goods issue.
    Why is this mapping error happening. How can this be resolved.
    Regards.
    Sumi

    Hi Nsangle/SAP gurus,
    Thanks for  that. But, I have already compared the failing idoc with the successful one. It's the segment E1EDT13 006 missing in the wrong idoc. I have already added that idoc and reprocessed it.
    But, I wanted to know why such kind of idoc segment missing/ mapping error happens.
    Regards.
    Sumi

  • Java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray error for large payload

    Our is an outbound flow where one FTP adapter picks the files and it calls a requester service, requester service calls the EBS and EBS calls the provider service, and finally file is getting written using the B2B.
    Since last 4/5 days we are getting java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray.
    We are getting this error when large payloads are being used for doing testing.
    As per our understanding, when you have a tree of composite invocations (so A invokes B invokes C invokes D via flowN 100 times), none of the memory is released until they all complete.
    1. Could you please let us know exactly when memory is released?
    2. How to tune/optimize this?
    Our flow is like:
    SyncDisbursePaymentGetFtpAdapter --> CreateDisbursedPaymentEbizReqABCSImp l--> SyncDisbursePaymentRBTTEBS --> SyncDisbursedPaymentJPMC_CHKProvABCSImpl--> AIAB2BInterface --> Oracle B2B
    <Dec 12, 2012 8:17:06 PM EST> <Warning> <RMI> <BEA-080003> <RuntimeException thrown by rmi server: javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnecti\
    onImpl.invoke(Ljavax.management.ObjectName;Ljava.lang.String;Ljava.rmi.MarshalledObject;[Ljava.lang.String;Ljavax.security.auth.Subject;)
    javax.management.RuntimeErrorException: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray: [B, size 667664.
    javax.management.RuntimeErrorException: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray: [B, size 667664
    at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.rethrow(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:858)
    at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.rethrowMaybeMBeanException(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:869)
    at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:838)
    at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:761)
    at weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServerInterceptorBase$16.run(WLSMBeanServerInterceptorBase.java:449)
    Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    Caused By: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: allocLargeObjectOrArray: [B, size 667664
    at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2786)
    at java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream.write(ByteArrayOutputStream.java:94)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.drain(ObjectOutputStream.java:1847)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.setBlockDataMode(ObjectOutputStream.java:1756)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1169)
    Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    Do any one have any idea how to rectify this error as whole UAT environment has become down because of this issue.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Please find the required info:
    1. Operating System--> LINUX
    2. JVM (Sun or JRockit)-->JRockit
    3. Domain info (production mode enabled?, log levels, number of servers in cluster, number of servers in a machine)-->
    a) production mode enabled-->>Production mode is not enabled, we are going to enable it.
    b)Log levels---There are many logs b2b, soa, bpel, integration, which log level do I need to do finest(32).
    c) number of servers in cluster-->2
    d) number of servers in a machine-->1
    3. Payload info (size, xml/non-xml?,)
    a) size-->more than 1 MB, and upto 25 MB
    b)xml/non-xm--> xml
    we are trying to do the changes as suggested by you and will update accordingly.

  • Log and transfer error for large avchd file

    The log and transfer proces for large (>15 min) avchd MTS files results in an error. The process is aborted and the destination prores 422 file disappears from the finder.
    I shoot avchd MTS files with a Sony HXR NX5 onto SDHC 32Gb cards.
    I copy the entire image to an attached disk.
    In FCP6.0.6 I use log and transfer.
    The process works flawlessly for smaller clips.
    The longer clips fail.
    During the process I see the creation of a ProRes 422 MOV file and its growth. Before completion it ends in an abort.
    In the log and transfer dialog I get a red octangle sign with an exclamation mark. I am not able to get the details of the error.
    Q: what should I do to be able to use my longer clips?
    Coen Jeukens
    the Netherlands

    All disks, internal and external (hardwired) are macosextended.
    Have reset all prefs. Currently rerunning an 19 min import (will take over an hour).
    If that fails, I will resort to setting ins and outs.
    Thinking out loud, my sony NX5 produces MTS files of max 2Gb. If the clip is longer, it is split over multiple files on the SDHC.
    FCP seems to recognise this artificial split. In L&T it combines the split files into a single clip.
    Q: could it be that L&T stumbles over this artificial split of a clip?
    Coen

  • Catalog mapping error- with large entries

    Hello,
    When the catalog containing around 4000 items was uploaded, I received the error
    The exception occurred (program: /CCM/CL_MAPPING_MANAGER=======CP, include /CCM/CL_MAPPING_MANAGER=======CM00P, line: 465)
    However when the same catalog is getting uploaded when the catalog was split into two and then uploaded. Also the catalog with this large entries is getting uploaded in test system.
    Can anyone help me figure out the problem for mapping exception, and let me know if something can be done?
    Thanks!
    Swetha

    Hi Swetha,
    In my opinion this may be due to a timeout in mapping process. Which CCM SP level are you running?.
    Have you had a look to the SAP Note 926007?.
    I hope this help.
    Best Regards

  • Out of memory error for large recordings:

    Hi,
      My workflow process takes input as a list. It loops through the workflow for all the items in the list. If my list contain 4 items, there will be 3*7= 21 steps when I invoke the process. I can able to check my recordings for debugging.
    If I give 5 inputs, It takes around 5*7 = 35 steps in the workflow. If I try to play the recording, i see the error: java heap space: Out of memory exception. I changed my space to Xmx1024m in workbench.ini. I also did: java -Xms<initial heap size> -Xmx<maximum heap size> (Q1: do we need to restart the JBoss after we do the second step? ).
    Q2: My system is Windows7 with 4GB RAM. I have liveCycle 8.2 with SP2. JBoss & MySql. Do I need to set this java RAM size in any of our JBoss server files?
    Q3: Is there any file to set the maximum permissible steps for a process recording? If so, please let me know. It would be a great help.
    Thanks,
    Chaitanya

    If the size of the documents you are adding as input are very large this could result in OOM errors so that is something to consider. 
    Some other things to try are as follows:
    1. Increase memory allocated by JBoss by another 200 - 300 M as per the following documentation on the web:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/9.0/workbenchHelp/help.html?topic=000097&topic=00183 7
    2. Read the following sections of the Workbench Help which can be found on the web and describes how to limit your recording storage space used:  http://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/9.0/workbenchHelp/help.html?topic=000097&topic=00106 0
    I would suggest increasing your maxNumberOfRecordingEntries to about 200.
    Heather

  • Compile time errors for large code in try-catch blocks

    Hi, Has anyone ever faced this problem of a compile time error, where the Java compiler returns with the following error that Code is too large for try block.
    I have about 5000 thousand lines in my try-catch block and am facing this problem. Please suggest possible solutions

    1) Are you sure that your try/catch blocks contain 5 million lines?! I seriously don't believe this.Sounds like generated code. The generator needs to be a bit cleverer. In particular, it seems to be generating repeated blocks of code that ought to be stuffed into methods somewhere.

  • Configuring UBBCONFIG for Tuxedo/Q-Error for rebuild message queue server

    Hi..
    Am using Tuxedo10g R3 on AIX 5.3..
    Am using IBM COBOL..
    I need to write a program with Queue Concept in cobol,so for that i created queuespace and queue using the qmadmin command..
    While configuring UBBCONFIG file, as per the document which i referred:
    http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux80/pdf/usingq.pdf
    i used (pg no: 28)
    TMQUEUE SRVGRP="TMQUEUEGRP1" SRVID=1000 RESTART=Y GRACE=0 CLOPT="-s myqueuespace:TMQUEUE" in the servers section but while
    booting TMQUEUE failed to start.. so i went for the alternative option provided in the same document as
    buildserver -o TMQUEUE -s myqueuespace:TMQUEUE -r TUXEDO/QM \
    -f ${TUXDIR}/lib/TMQUEUE.o
    followed by
    TMQUEUE SRVGRP="TMQUEUEGRP1" SRVID=1000 RESTART=Y GRACE=0 \
    CLOPT="-A"
    while rebuilding TMQUEUE am getting this error:
    buildserver -o TMQUEUE -s myqueuespace:TMQUEUE -r TUXEDO/QM -f ${TUXDIR}/lib/TMQUEUE.o
    ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .qs_tcm_setup
    ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information.
    CMDTUX_CAT:1832: ERROR: can't execute cc -brtl -qstaticinline -qrtti=all -I$TUXDIR/include -o TMQUEUE BS-23f0be.c -L${TUXDIR}/lib
    /usr/Oracle/Tuxedo10g/lib/TMQUEUE.o -brtl -qstaticinline -ltux -lbuft -lqm -ltmib -lfml -lfml32 -lengine -lpthread
    can anyone help me in this??
    Thanks in advance..

    Hi Todd,
    Thanks for ur reply..
    my sample program will fetch records from a table in a database and will store that in a queue and will retrieve that records from the queue.. i hope one queuespace is enough for this program.. while booting am getting these messages in the ULOG.. am i missing any step in the configuration??
    230153.ibmsceai!BBL.2502724.1.0: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit, Patch Level (none)
    230153.ibmsceai!BBL.2502724.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2019544.1.0: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2019544.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2355258.1.0: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2355258.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2568346.1.0: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit
    230153.ibmsceai!TMS_QM.2568346.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: Q_CAT:1497: ERROR: xa_open() - no more process table slots
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:466: ERROR: tpopen TPERMERR xa_open returned XAER_RMERR
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: Q_CAT:1630: ERROR: tpopen() failed, tperrno = 16
    230154.ibmsceai!TMQUEUE.651302.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:250: ERROR: tpsvrinit() failed
    230154.ibmsceai!tmboot.495778.1.-2: 04-24-2009: Tuxedo Version 10.3.0.0, 32-bit
    230154.ibmsceai!tmboot.495778.1.-2: CMDTUX_CAT:825: ERROR: Process TMQUEUE at cicsapp failed with /T tperrno (TPERMERR - resource manager error)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Text Insets and Cross Reference Links

    When I use text insets to produce a host file from my source file, I have cross reference links that update OK. However, once I produce a PDF of the host file (text inset), my links do not work. I do not even get the little hand icon to indicate they

  • Is it possible to install a SSD in a MacBook?

    Is it possible to install a SSD in a MacBook? Saw some posts on google re: a Pro, but I use a MacBook for live performance and could really use the reliability of a SSD. Where to purchase, and how easy is an install?

  • Spry Tabbed Panels: Tabs

    I'm experimenting with Spry Tabbed Panels. The problem I couldn't work out is that how to get panel tabs stay on their place. They seems to be jumping out (far right) when I click on enter key while my cursor in the tab content area. This happens on

  • Bookmarks problem in Safari, please help!

    When I open safari, and this is for the Bookmarks Bar, I will go to click one of my bookmarks, and they wont be clicked! It's really weird. Like usually when you click a bookmark, it'll show you it has been clicked. I will click it many many times be

  • Pages 5.0.1 file won't open

    I've read other posts.  My old docs still open in '09.  I've created new ones in 5.0.1 and have been able to open them.  Now I just created one, saved it to my desktop, tried to open it and I'm told I need to buy the upgrade, 5.0.1, which I'm using!