Material purchase with different price

dear all,
please let me know standard reports in sap which can understand me the material purchase with different prices along with period.
thanks in advace

Hi,
Please refer MBEW & MBEWH tables. If the you want a report then go for a simple SAP Querry to meet your requirement.
regds,
CB

Similar Messages

Items in the shopping cart appear with different price than in the catalog

Hi All,
We are running SRM 5.0 (Classic Scenario) with external catalogues.
After selecting items from the external catalogue and transferring them to the shopping cart, the items appear with different price(the problem exists in the productive system)
The strange thing is that there is no dependence or sequence between the differences. For example, in one shopping cart, one item is with correct price, the price of the other item is not correct (when I click on the icon which is showing item details in the catalogue, the price is different than the one in the shopping cart). Sometimes the difference is significant, sometimes not - if the item price in the catalogue is 22.34 EUR, in the shopping cart is 21.22EUR or if the item is 45.62EUR in the shopping cart is 45.60 EUR. There is no logic.
I tried to create a shopping cart in the support system, with the same items from this catalogue, and they are sent back in SRM with the correct prices.
I traced all OCI parameters, sent from the supplier catalogue, and everything is correct.
At the example given below the price in the shopping cart ordered in the productive system is 69.00CZK, and after that during the test the correct price of 73.870CZK has appeared.
NEW_ITEM-DESCRIPTION==Durable-KeyClip-keytag%2C+black
NEW_ITEM-MATNR==
NEW_ITEM-MATGROUP==
NEW_ITEM-QUANTITY==10
NEW_ITEM-UNIT==EA
NEW_ITEM-PRICE==73.870
NEW_ITEM-PRICEUNIT==1
NEW_ITEM-CURRENCY==CZK
NEW_ITEM-NEW_ITEM-LEADTIME==1
NEW_ITEM-VENDOR==
NEW_ITEM-VENDORMAT==0176%2F1957001
NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTCODE==
NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTMAT==
NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT==
NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT_ITEM==
NEW_ITEM-SERVICE==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ID==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ITEM==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_PRODUCT_ID==23109
NEW_ITEM-EXT_SCHEMA_TYPE==UNSPSC
NEW_ITEM-EXT_CATEGORY_ID==55121504
NEW_ITEM-LONGTEXT_1%3A132==Durable-KeyClip%0D%0Akeytag%2Cblack%0D%0A%0D%0A6pc
I checked the error log in SLG1 for BBP_OCI, and no error message exists. In my opinion the problem can be in supplier system, because otherwise all items will be with wrong price. And at the moment, there are shopping carts in which all items are with the correct price!
It is not something in the user profile, because in one shopping cart created by one user some items are correct, some of them not.
I also checked with the supplier, they said that they haven't change the price, recently.
Has somebody of you met this problem?
In the IMG-> Define External Web Services (Catalogs, Vendor Lists etc.) I have set all parameters for the standard call structure: the URL of the supplier, our company ID and password for their catalogue.
In the Detail view for the catalogue, the following parameters are set
u201CAdditional functions in the product catalogueu201D field:
-     Display product data again in the catalogue
-     Validate product data from SAP Enterprise Buyer
-     Find supply sources
u201CTechnical Settingsu201D field
- Use Error Log
Thanks,
Desi

That means that we are not maintaining material numbers in SRM, so there are no predefined price or info records for that materials in R/3 system, or in SRM.
In the set up of external catalogues, validation of the price is set. Which means that, if a new shopping cart is created from already existing one, and meanwhile, a change of the price is done by the supplier in the catalogue, the new item price will be adopted in the shopping cart.
No prices are maintained in the SRM system, everything is from the supplier catalogue.
Desi

Stock transfer between plants in a company with different price

Hi, expert,
i want to transfer materials between plants inside a company with different price which set by supply plant randomly, not the valuation price, how can i achieve this?
Thxs & best wishes,
David

Hi,
In short, you cannot.
Within SAP you cannot make a profit or loss by transferring an item between two Plants within the same company code.
This is not necessarily an SAP restriction as such, it is due to basic accounting rules.
The company code is seen as the legal entity for accounting and so if a movement within that company resulted in a loss or profit then this would break the rules.
I am not saying that it is impossible to set it up this way (nothing is impossible) but I personally recommend that you find another way of achieving this. Trying to modify the system to break such an important rule will definitely cause problems.
In previous implementations I have used the following option.
Simple use basic STOs that transfer the items at the material valuation price. But then at the end of each month produce a report that shows what materials have been transferred between the relevant plants and at THAT stage make a financial posting to reflect the "benefit" that has been realised (based on prices held in a new table, that represent the price that would have been charged).
It does appear to be a failing of the SAP system but it really isn't. What it normally indicates is that somehow the wrong org structure may have been built and perhaps the two plant should really be attached to separate company codes (especially if you need to show "profits and loss" in this way)?
Steve B

Duplicate qty with Different Price after discount column in Inventory Posit

Hi,
I am getting Inventory duplicate qty with Different Price after discount column in Inventory Positing List Reports When I make A/R credit memo thru DI API.
With regards,
Venki .A

hi
you can just see the above given data there is a filed total_qty there are two rows showing 0 why it happens i dont understand because i wrote same as for others. all were showng what my input but when the prod_id repeats then it was not taken the total_qty it wll show me 0
Please Guide
Thanks And Regards
Vikas Snghal

Purchasing info records with different prices for different packaging

Hi,
hope, someone can help me.
We have different prices for different kind of packaging, but all the material is bought in the same unit, i.e. kg.
Let's say, usually you buy x kg in a drum, but sometimes you buy y (or x) kg in a bottle or in a bag.
We won't allow variable order units. Even if we would, it's not helpful, because we always order kg.
So the price depends on a criterion - I don't know, which to take. And we want to maintain the different prices in the info records.
Is there a solution?

Hi.
I went through the history of the problem.It seems that your base unit of measure is KG.Also you have mentined that same material is used in various plants.
You need to activate the variable ordering unit 2 in material master. This is present in the materila master Purchasing tab.Also note that this data is maintained at plant level. This will not have any impact on the materials which are presnt in the other plants.
After activating variable order unit in materal master. You need maintains the conversion factors from Order units to Base UOM.(Eg 1 KG = 1 KG, 1BOX = 10 KG etc)
Create inforecord for the material and maintain price in Base unit of measure.
In PO enter the order unit as BOX system will automatically calculate the price of BOX based on the conversion factors which are maintained in the material master.
I belive this is the simple and best solution for your requirement..
If you have any suggestions please let me know
Cheers
Umakanth

MIRO, enter one material with different price

Hi Experts,
i have one PO and the material number is 20MTF70301, the quantitiy is 3. Because of the material price is different(same material number) i need the enter them line by line. For example;
Material                     Plant         D/C        Amount      Quantity
20MTF70301     1015     S Debit     1917,30     1
20MTF70301     1015     S Debit     794,55     1
20MTF70301     1015     S Debit     249,39-     1
But the system warning is like that "Double entries for material 20MTF70301 1015 are deleted". After this warning , system automatically delete last 2 line.
How can i enter same material line by line.
Thanks,

Hi
It will naturally delete the two last items, just understand, You have the same material same vendor but want to have 3 different prices in three lines in One PO, are you not contradicting the basic idea which SAP follows, how do the in-fo recoprd will get updated? with which price?
It is not that you can not do , but for that you have to go for another PO for a different price and the vendor but not in the same PO.
Regards

Batch valuation with different price control

Hi experts,
Our requirement is to combine batch valuation and split valuation for the same material. We want to have valuation by batch (1 price for each batch). However, we need to classify the material into 2 types because of price control.
Example:
We classify batches into 2 types.
- in-house production (Price control S)
- purchasing (Price control V)
Make use of user exit, we may have batches starting with:
- PRD000001, PRD000002, PRD000003...
- PUR000001, PUR000002, PUR000003...
Our question is:
How can we achieve the requirement where sometimes we want S and sometimes we want V at batch level?
We understand that we can change the price control in material master after the batch is generated. But is it possible to change price control at the same time when batch is generated?
Please feel free to give any idea. Thanks a lot.

It is possible to have batch specific valuation by using valuation category X. This way, you will have a valuation type for each batch.
If the batches are created in advance (and not during material movements), then it is possible to have a separate price control and valuation class depending on batch number.
In your case, since the batch nomenclature for inhouse produced and purchased are different, it can be done without confusion.
Regards,
Aroop

Having Multiple Material Codes with Different Profit Centers in one Plant

Hi,
Can someone explain me what impact it will have, if there are different Material Codes with multiple profit centers in a single plant? For example, say Material 1 has Profit Center as PC1 and Material 2 has Profit Center as PC2 and they are in a single plant. Will this have impact on Financial Transactions?
Thanks and Regards,
Sameer Joshi

Hi Sameer
No negative impact.. It is very much possible and logical
All the purchases made - > Stocks and vendor liability will be tagged to the PC of the Material
All the sales made -> COGS, Revenue and Customer Liability will be tagged to the PC of the material, unless you overwrite using a Substitution
Br, Ajay M

Material(pen) with different colors

Dear Friends,
Please give the details of how to maintain a material(pen) in different colors(blue/black/green/red etc.).when I do purchase order(PO)/GR for that pen(unique material) is there is any specific option to do the PO/GR for black,blue......Awaiting for your replies....
Thanks in advance
Regards
Eliaz

Hi
Use can active batch management and create batches with classifaction (color coding).
Thanks

Material Code with Different profit Centers in One Plant

Hi Experts,
There is one requirement in my project that given in detailed below please:
Material code                     Plant                       Profit Center
MSR009                            2011                       2011
                                                                        2012
                                                                        2013
one material code, one plant and 3 profit center,. the material should trigger with different profit center from sales order to revenue booking..
So is it possible to map that configuration in SAP, if yes please guide me
Thanks and regards
Madhu

Hi,
Profit centre is trigured through
Material master
Company code + Cost element
When you create sales order it id derived form material master if you maintained in material master
Else at the time of invoice creation and account posting it is derived from company code + cost element combination(Which is mentianed in OKB9 by FICO people)
kapil

With iOS 8's family sharing, will family members be able to share apps that they previously purchased with different credit cards with one another for free (given that they will all use the same credit card once iOS 8 comes out)?

Question 1: In my family of 4, we currently have different Apple ID's and we all use different credit cards to purchase our apps and media. When iOS 8 is released, if we agree to share the same credit card, will we be able to access apps that a family member purchased with their own credit card prior to iOS 8's release? To clarify, under iOS 7, Member 1 has purchased Apps A and B with his credit card. Under iOS 8, if Members 1, 2, 3, 4 decide to use Member 4's credit card, will Members 2, 3, 4 be able to access Apps A and B?
Question 2: If we all decide to use the same credit card now, once iOS 8 is released, will family members have access to the apps/media purchased by the fourth family member?

You can read everything that is known about ios 8 on Apples website.
There is no way for anyone to know any more than that.

How to calculate Total Price based on a sqm rate with different price points?

Hi,
I'm guessing this is a script solution but I've never done any scripting so though I'd ask you guys...
I have a form where I'd like to calculate the total price of some carpet based on the price per sqm.
- The user enters the carpet quanitity required.
- There are different price points for 1-20, 21-60, 61+sqm (each with their own hidden fields containing the price value).
- The Total Price field assesses the quantity ordered, and multiplis it by the relevant square metre rate.
Is this achievable?
I'm guessing any solutions are placed into the "Custom Calculation Script" field too?
Thanks in advance!

Yes. You can use something like this as the custom calculation of the total price field (you might need to adjust the field names):
var sqm = Number(this.getField("SQM").value);
var rate = 0;
if (sqm>0 && sqm<=20) rate = Number(this.getField("Rate1").value);
else if (sqm>20 && sqm<=60) rate = Number(this.getField("Rate2").value);
else if (sqm>60) rate = Number(this.getField("Rate3").value);
event.value = sqm * rate;

Query rewrites with Nested materialized views with different aggregations

Platform used : Oracle 11g.
Here is a simple fact table (with measures m1,m2) and dimensions (a) Location (b) Calendar and (c) Product. The business problem is that aggregation operator for measure m1,m2 are different along location dimension and Calendar dimension. The intention is to preaggregate the measures for a product along the calendar dimension and Location dimension and store it as materialized views.
The direct option is to define a materialized view with Inline queries (Because of the different aggrergation operator, it is not possible to write a query without Inline query). http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28313/qradv.htm#BABEAJBF documents the limitations that it works only for 'Text match' and 'Equivalent queries' and that is too limiting.
So decided to have nested materialized view, with first view having just joins(my_dim_mvw_joins), the second view having aggregations along Calendar dimension (my_dim_mvw_calendar) and third view having aggregations along the Location dimension(my_dim_mvw_location). Obviously I do not want the query I fire to know about materialized views and I fire it against the fact table. I see that for the fired query (Which needs aggregations along both Calendar and Location), is rewritten with just second materialized view but not the third. (Had set QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY as TRUSTED) .
Wanted to know whether there are limitations on Query Writes with nested materialized views? Thanks
(Have given a simple testable example below. Pls ignore the values given in 'CALENDAR_IDs', 'PRODUCT_IDs' etc as they are the same for all the queries)
-- Calendar hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "CALENDAR_ID" NUMBER(5,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
CONSTRAINT "CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("CALENDAR_ID")
-- Location hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "LOCATION_ID" NUMBER(3,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
CONSTRAINT "LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("LOCATION_ID")
-- Product hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "PRODUCT_ID" NUMBER(3,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY5_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY6_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     CONSTRAINT "PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("PRODUCT_ID")
-- Fact table
CREATE TABLE RETAILER_SALES_TBL
(     "PRODUCT_ID" NUMBER,
"PRODUCT_KEY" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"PLAN_ID" NUMBER,
"PLAN_PERIOD_ID" NUMBER,
"PERIOD_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"M1" NUMBER,
"M2" NUMBER,
"M3" NUMBER,
"M4" NUMBER,
"M5" NUMBER,
"M6" NUMBER,
"M7" NUMBER,
"M8" NUMBER,
"LOCATION_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"M9" NUMBER,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_LOCATI_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("LOCATION_ID")
REFERENCES LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE ("LOCATION_ID") ENABLE,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_PRODUC_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("PRODUCT_ID")
REFERENCES PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE ("PRODUCT_ID") ENABLE,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_CALEND_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("PERIOD_ID")
REFERENCES CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE ("CALENDAR_ID") ENABLE
-- Location dimension definition to promote query rewrite
create DIMENSION LOCATION_DIM
LEVEL CHAIN IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY1_ID
LEVEL CONSUMER_SEGMENT IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY3_ID
LEVEL STORE IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.LOCATION_ID
LEVEL TRADING_AREA IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY2_ID
HIERARCHY PROD_ROLLUP (
STORE CHILD OF
CONSUMER_SEGMENT CHILD OF
TRADING_AREA CHILD OF
CHAIN
-- Calendar dimension definition
create DIMENSION CALENDAR_DIM
LEVEL MONTH IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY3_ID
LEVEL QUARTER IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY2_ID
LEVEL WEEK IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.CALENDAR_ID
LEVEL YEAR IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY1_ID
HIERARCHY CALENDAR_ROLLUP (
WEEK CHILD OF
MONTH CHILD OF
QUARTER CHILD OF
YEAR
-- Materialized view with just joins needed for other views
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_joins build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, lht.HIERARCHY1_ID, lht.HIERARCHY2_ID, lht.HIERARCHY3_ID, lht.location_id, cht.HIERARCHY1_ID year,
cht.HIERARCHY2_ID quarter, cht.HIERARCHY3_ID month, cht.calendar_id week, m1, m3, m7, m9
from retailer_sales_tbl RS, calendar_hierarchy_tree cht, location_hierarchy_tree lht
WHERE RS.period_id = cht.CALENDAR_ID
and RS.location_id = lht.location_id
and cht.CALENDAR_ID in (10,236,237,238,239,608,609,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618,619,1426,1427,1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434,1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471,1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477)
AND product_id IN (5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20)
AND lht.location_id IN (2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
-- Materialized view which aggregate along calendar dimension
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_calendar build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID ,location_id, year, quarter, month, week,
sum(m1) m1_total, sum(m3) m3_total, sum(m7) m7_total, sum(m9) m9_total,
GROUPING_ID(product_id, location_id, year, quarter, month, week) dim_mvw_gid
from my_dim_mvw_joins
GROUP BY product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID , location_id,
rollup (year, quarter, month, week);
-- Materialized view which aggregate along Location dimension
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_location build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, year, quarter, month, week, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id,
sum(m1_total) m1_total_1, sum(m3_total) m3_total_1, sum(m7_total) m7_total_1, sum(m9_total) m9_total_1,
GROUPING_ID(product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id, year, quarter, month, week) dim_mvw_gid
from my_dim_mvw_calendar
GROUP BY product_id, year, quarter, month, week,
rollup (HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id)
-- SQL Query Fired (for simplicity have used SUM as aggregation operator for both, but they will be different)
select product_id, year, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID,
sum(m1_total) m1_total_1, sum(m3_total) m3_total_1, sum(m7_total) m7_total_1, sum(m9_total) m9_total_1
from
select product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , year,
sum(m1) m1_total, sum(m3) m3_total, sum(m7) m7_total, sum(m9) m9_total
from
select product_id, lht.HIERARCHY1_ID , lht.HIERARCHY2_ID , lht.HIERARCHY3_ID ,lht.location_id, cht.HIERARCHY1_ID year, cht.HIERARCHY2_ID quarter, cht.HIERARCHY3_ID month, cht.calendar_id week,m1,m3,m7,m9
from
retailer_sales_tbl RS, calendar_hierarchy_tree cht, location_hierarchy_tree lht
WHERE RS.period_id = cht.CALENDAR_ID
and RS.location_id = lht.location_id
and cht.CALENDAR_ID in (10,236,237,238,239,608,609,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618,619,1426,1427,1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434,1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471,1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477)
AND product_id IN (5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20)
AND lht.location_id IN (2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
GROUP BY product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID , location_id, year
) sales_time
GROUP BY product_id, year,HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID
This Query rewrites only with my_dim_mvw_calendar. (as saw in Query Plan and EXPLAIN_MVIEW). But we would like it to use my_dim_mvw_location as that has aggregations for both dimensions.

blackhole001 wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to make my programmer's life easier by creating a database view for them to query the data, so they don't have to worry about joining tables. This sounds like a pretty horrible idea. I say this because you will eventually end up with programmers that know nothing about your data model and how to properly interact with it.
Additionally, what you will get is a developer that takes one of your views and see's that of the 20 columns in it, it has 4 that he needs. If all those 4 columns comes from a simple 2 table join, but the view has 8 tables, you're wasting a tonne of resources by using the view (and heaven forbid they have to join that view to another view to get 4 of the 20 columns from that other view as well).
Ideally you'd write stored routines that satisfy exactly what is required (if you are the database resource and these other programmers are java, .net, etc... based) and the front end developers would call those routines customized for an exact purpose.
Creating views is not bad, but it's by no means a proper solution to having developers not learn or understand SQL and/or the data model.

Auto GR for the same material and with different routings to diff stor loc

Hi All,
I have a semi finished material having 2 different routings line 1 and line 2 and with respective 2 different storage locations but need to have Auto GR.

I'm not sure what you are asking; to cause an operation to do auto GR, you need to choose the right operation control key. The auto GR is controlled via the operation control key.
Then for the Slocs; on the production version (MRP 4 view) you have a field "receiving location". Maintain for each of the two versions the right location.
Next, create a new production order, and choose one of the production versions. Release, and do CO11N for the operation with the auto GR control key. See that it is received in the desired Sloc..

Purchase order different price

Hi,
can we create one PO with different curency for example one line item with USD and another line item with EUR and third line item in INR.
Pleease guide
regards
sp

Hi,
No, you cannot create the P.O like that for different line items
G.Ganesh Kumar

Material purchase with different price

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for