Max results for facility search 500. Is there a setting
Is there a setting to increase the result set size of Facilities in a result set? We have users searching for Facilities and it gives a message saying the 500 record maximum has been hit with no option to open another page or see all the results.
i didn't see any config for this in the E17153_01 document.
Thanks,
David
ah, I understand now. I thought you were saying no records were returned and you ONLY got a message saying '500 search results has been exceeded.'
Returning a maximum of 500 records is as designed and not configurable for performance reasons. Typically, we recommend adding criteria to limit your result set. If there is a valid business use case for displaying > 500 records, then I suggest submitting an enhancement request.
thanks,
-M
Similar Messages
-
i recently got my logic board replaced. ever since, finder has found 0 results for every search. i specified to check on both the hard drive and computer. anybody know what's the problem?
You probably need to rebuild the Spotlight index. (I'm not sure why, though.) You'll find instructions and much more here:
http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/stopspotlightindex.html -
I can't search for book or authors in ibooks. When I search an author or book and click on it a message that says not results found comes up. Even if I try to look up something popular like Dracula or Twilight. Is there some setting I should have clicked? It won't find or download any books at all anymore. This started about a month ago. I have been using my Kindle app instead.
Hi laurieg23,
I see that you are having issues with your connection to the iBooks Store. Here is an article with some troubleshooting steps that will be relevant to your issue, even though the article was written for issues with the iTunes Store:
Troubleshoot issues on an iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch
If you haven't been able to connect to the iTunes Store:
Make sure your date, time, and time zone are correct in Settings > General > Date & Time.
Note: Time Zone may list another city in your time zone.
Make sure that your iOS software is up to date by tapping Settings > General > Software Update(iOS 5 or later) or connecting your iOS device to iTunes and clicking Check for Update on your device's Summary page.
Check and verify that you're in range of a Wi-Fi router or base station. If you're on a device with cellular service, make sure that cellular data is turned on from Settings > General > Cellular.
Note: If connected to cellular data, larger items may not download. You may need to connect to Wi-Fi to download apps, videos, and podcasts.
Make sure that you have an active Internet connection. You can check the user guide for your device for help with connecting to the Internet.
Make sure that other devices (portable computers, for example) are able to connect to the Wi-Fi network and access the Internet.
Try resetting (turning off and then on again) your Wi-Fi router.
If the issue persists, try troubleshooting your Wi-Fi networks and connections.
Can't connect to the iTunes Store - Apple Support
https://support.apple.com/en-is/HT201400
Take care, and thanks for visiting the Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
Braden -
How to set Max Rows when I search extended attribute in Admin Setting?
When I search extended attributes in Admin Setting, the default max row is 500.
Can I change the Max rows' Setting?
ThanksWe don't have a feature config for this in the core application, however you can adjust the 500 limit using a ready report. Ready Reports is a solution pack that allows you to create saved searches in the form of reports. You can get the ready reports solution pack in the latest extensibility pack.
-
How to get more than 300 results for a search
Hi all,
When we search for something in a peoplesoft, we get 300 default results right.
Is there a way we can change that to 500 or 600 or any.
Please help me.
Thank you,
Bye.I heard that we have to do some settings in psappserv.cfg file to get more than 300 rows in a search. Is that true?
Please help me.
Thank you,
Bye. -
Filter results for New Search Criteria of Advanced Search
Hi,
I'm new to oaf.
I have added extended VO item to seeded advanced search region as new search criteria by personalization.
When i try to search for new criteria the results are not filtering and my extended CO logic as follows:
IN PFR:
if(oapagecontext.getParameter(oaquerybean.getGoButtonName()) != null || oapagecontext.getParameter(oaquerybean.getPersonalizeGoButtonName()) != null)
OAAdvancedSearchBean oaadvancedsearchbean = (OAAdvancedSearchBean)oawebbean.findChildRecursive("assetAdvSearch");
boolean flag = true;
if(oaadvancedsearchbean != null)
int i = oaadvancedsearchbean.getDisplayedCriteriaCount();
String s4 = oapagecontext.getParameter("advancedSearchRadioGroup");
for(int j = 0; j < i; j++)
String s6 = (new StringBuilder()).append("Value_").append(Integer.toString(j)).toString();
String s7 = (new StringBuilder()).append("Condition_").append(Integer.toString(j)).toString();
String s8 = oaadvancedsearchbean.getOriginalUINodeName(s6);
if(s8.equals("XXAssocMsgInput"))
String xx=oapagecontext.getParameter(s6);
oapagecontext.writeDiagnostics(this, "criteria value: "+xx, 105);
if (xx !=null) {
StringBuffer stringbuffer = new StringBuffer(100);
// Setting whereClause at Runtime to restrict the query
OAApplicationModule rootam = oapagecontext.getApplicationModule(oawebbean);
OAApplicationModule childAM = (OAApplicationModule)rootam.findApplicationModule("XXAdvSearchAM");
OAViewObject vvo1 = (OAViewObject)childAM.findViewObject("XXAdvSearchVO1");
Serializable[] parameters = {xx};
childAM.invokeMethod("getAssociateWith", parameters);
In AMImpl:
public void getAssociateWith(String xx)
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject)getXXAdvSearchVO1();
Vector parameters = new Vector(2);
StringBuffer whereClause = new StringBuffer(100);
int clauseCount = 0;
int bindCount = 0;
vo.setWhereClauseParams(null); // Always reset
if ((xx!=null) && (!("".equals(xx.trim()))))
whereClause.append(" ASSOCIATE_WITH LIKE :");
whereClause.append(++bindCount);
parameters.addElement(xx);
clauseCount++;
vo.setWhereClause(whereClause.toString());
writeDiagnostics(this,"In AMIMPL whereclause:"+whereClause.toString(),119);
if (bindCount >0)
Object[] params=new Object[bindCount];
parameters.copyInto(params);
vo.setWhereClauseParams(params);
writeDiagnostics(this,"In AMIMPL XXAdvSearchVO:"+vo.getQuery(),120);
writeDiagnostics(this,"In AMIMPL VO Cnt:"+vo.getRowCount(),121);
vo.executeQuery();
writeDiagnostics(this,"After query = " + vo.getQuery(),123);
In diagnostics, parameter is not getting assigned with the value ..
Can you anyone suggest the inputs?
Thanks,
mallik
Edited by: 758972 on Jul 29, 2012 1:09 PMMallik,
Is it the same requirement which we were discussing in another thread, to add search criteria in advance serch bean through personalization.
If yes, let me try at my end and will let you know..
--Parag Narkhede -
Wrong results for context search on empty element tags
I'm using Oracle DBMS 11.1 and 11.2 and created a context index on an XML column (section group: PATH_SECTION_GROUP).
When entering a query like
SELECT count(*) FROM my_table t WHERE contains (t.co_xml,'hasPath(/tag1/tag2)') > 0
I get wrong results if tag2 is an empty element tag (<tag2/>) that appears somewhere within the
XML instance, but NOT directly under tag1.
E.g., the following XML instance is found (but shouldn't!):
<a>
<tag1>bla<tag3>bla</tag3></tag1>
<tag4>bla<tag2/></tag4>
</a>
This seems to happen only for empty element tags. Is this a known bug and does anybody know a workaround?
Thanks in advance for your help!
RomanI am unable to reproduce the problem. Can you provide a copy and paste of an actual run, including create table, insert data, create index, and select, as I have done below?
SCOTT@orcl_11g> select * from v$version
2 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.6.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
SCOTT@orcl_11g> create table my_table
2 (co_xml xmltype)
3 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> insert into my_table values (
2 xmltype ('<?xml version="1.0"?>
3 <tag5>
4 <tag1>bla<tag3>bla</tag3></tag1>
5 <tag4>bla<tag2/></tag4>
6 </tag5>'))
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> create index my_idx
2 on my_table (co_xml)
3 indextype is ctxsys.context
4 parameters ('section group ctxsys.path_section_group')
5 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT count(*)
2 FROM my_table t
3 WHERE contains (t.co_xml, 'hasPath (//tag1/tag2)') > 0
4 /
COUNT(*)
0
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT count(*)
2 FROM my_table t
3 WHERE contains (t.co_xml, 'hasPath (//tag1/tag3)') > 0
4 /
COUNT(*)
1
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -
Tuning code to return results for EVERY DAYS even if there is no data.
Hi,
SELECT a,b,c,DAY (some days aren't in the results because the is no data for this day)This code returns all days of the month
SELECT DAYS_OF_MONTH FROM DUAL....How can I use both queries together so that the result returns data for all days (if no data it will write 0)
Someone said a union would do the trick. I was unable to make it work.
Regards,
THKKK
Edited by: The Hong Kong King Kong on May 4, 2010 7:36 AMHi,
So this is what I've got and it does not compute. ( It's giving ORA-00904 DAYSOFMONTH NOT VALID IDENTIFIER --> DAYS_OF_MONTH = SERV1.DAY(+)
WITH all_days AS
SELECT
TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(LEVEL||'-'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-1),'MON-YY'),'DD-MON-YY'),'DD') *DAYSOFMONTH*
FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <= TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(LAST_DAY(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-1)),'DD'))
SELECT *all_days.DAYSOFMONTH*, nvl(SERV1.DAY,'TOTAL MONTH:') DAY,
nvl(SUM(SERV1.GOOD),0) GOOD1,
nvl(SUM(SERV1.WRONG),0) WRONG1,
nvl(SUM(SERV2.GOOD),0) GOOD2,
nvl(SUM(SERV2.WRONG),0) WRONG2,
nvl(SUM(SERV3.GOOD),0) GOOD3,
nvl(SUM(SERV3.WRONG),0) WRONG3,
(nvl(SUM(SERV1.GOOD),0)+nvl(SUM(SERV2.GOOD),0)+nvl(SUM(SERV3.GOOD),0)) TOTAL_GOOD,
(nvl(SUM(SERV1.WRONG),0)+nvl(SUM(SERV2.WRONG),0)+nvl(SUM(SERV3.WRONG),0)) TOTAL_WRONG
FROM (SELECT TO_CHAR(FINISHED, 'dd') DAY,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) GOOD,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE NOT IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) WRONG
FROM my_table
WHERE SERVER_NAME = 'somename1'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR (FINISHED, 'dd')) Serv1,
(SELECT TO_CHAR (FINISHED, 'dd') DAY,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) GOOD,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE NOT IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) WRONG
FROM MY_TABLE
WHERE SERVER_NAME = 'somename2'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR (FINISHED, 'dd')) Serv2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR (FINISHED, 'dd') DAY,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) GOOD,
SUM(CASE
WHEN STATUS_CODE NOT IN (4, 12) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) WRONG
FROM my_table
WHERE NOM_SERVEUR_RAPP <> 'somename1'
AND NOM_SERVEUR_RAPP <> 'somename2'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR (FINISHED, 'dd')) SERV3
WHERE Serv1.JOUR = Serv2.DAY(+)
AND Serv2.JOUR = Serv3.DAY(+)
*AND JOURS_DU_MOIS = SERV1.DAY (+)*
GROUP BY ROLLUP (SERV1.DAY)
ORDER BY 1;Also, the LEFT OUTER JOIN cannot be used along with (+).
Please help! -
Looking for AppMATes Cars 2 app and get "no results" for my search.
Bought the Disney/Pixar Cars toy for my grandson. It comes with two cars and tells you to "download the cars app." Which one?
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cars-2-appmates/id461788392?mt=8
-
Does RoboHelp 11 have the ability to add filters for the search function?
Does Robohelp 11 have the ability to add filters for the search function?
There's a page on my site about ZoomSearch. You can set up Rh to work with that and have a page with links or buttons that bring up different search options.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge -
Hi I am from south Africa and wi fi is very restricted so I have a 3G card in my iPad and it has a 5 Gig capacity, however when I want to download applications bigger than 20meg it asks for a wifi connection.Is there a setting I can change so to allow a higher capacity 3G downloads?
The R201 MiFi is really nifty. It's the size of a credit card, and a bit thicker. Costs just over R1200 and can connect up to 5 devices. It charges via USB or via the iPad adapter and will give about 3 hours use on a charge. I actually feel that with a MiFi, you don't need any 3G on the iPad.
-
Is there a way to remove the FormsCentral ad from a google search result for a form
We have noticed that the google search results for our forms have the following:
Raleigh-Wake Emergency Communications Center Customer ...
https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=Rov-d68AFo2aQMaFxrAGvw
This form was easily created for FREE with FormsCentral. ... The Raleigh-Wake Emergency Communications Center is committed to providing the best service ...
Since we have a paid account, we would prefer that the red text not be included in the search result. Can this be removed?Hi;
We're looking into what we can do for this. I'll post an update in the future.
Thanks,
Josh -
Reduce max. results in SRM F4-search
Dear SRM gurus,
in SRM 5.0 in tab "Cost assignment". Is there a possibility to set a value for the max. results in F4 help "Find Account Assignment Data" and in "G/L Account"
By standard it is set to 500. Because we're facing performance issues is there a possibility to reduce it to a maximum of 200 results?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Kind regards,
HenningHi Hennig,
I feel for this case you need to make template change as value of 500 is populated into Web template.
Just right click on SRM webtemplete and do a view source and this will open code in notepad and make changes where you are getting this search help and look for "Maximum No. of Hits" . You will get this value over there...
Ask someone technical in team to make changes in template and again publish the files..
It will solve your issue.
Regards,Nishant -
RoboHelp HTML 9 Search Pane Max results controls
RoboHelp HTML 9 with WebHelp as output...
I have a two part question. By default when our users do a search in compile dhelp, they see 10 search results per page. Is there a place in my RoboHelp interface where I can change that to larger number? I have found a line of code in a *.js file where it looks like I could manually change it, but would prefer not to have to do it that route in case that causes unintended hiccups elsewhere.
var nMaxResult = 10 ;
Second part of my question is related to statement in release notes/new features notes for RoboHelp 9 that state users can control the max search results per page on-the-fly as they use the Search pane. This feature only applies to WebHelp or WebHelp Pro and my output is WebHelp. I can see a line of code for that feature in the whfform.htm file but nothing shows up like that in the Search pane within compiled help. Is this a bug or is there a control somewhere in RoboHelp project settings that allows me to enable that option for users? The last 2 lines below would seem to control this area. The Search pane items referenced in first 4 lines do show up ok in my Search pane.
gsTitle = "Type in the word(s) to search for:";
gsTitle = "Type in the word(s) to search for:";
gsHiliteSearchTitle = "Highlight search results";
gsHiliteSearchTitle = "Highlight search results";
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page" ;
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page";
Thanks for any insight you can provide,
KFI know this is an old topic, but I was trying to figure this out myself today and finally found it. In case others have been looking for this, it's in in this file:
whform.js
find this variable:
var gnMaxRslt = 10;
and then change the 10 to the number you want.
If you do that in the generated help, the number will change in the Search pane, but it will still display only 10 results. To get it to actually display more than 10 results, I had to edit the RoboHelp file, not the generated help. I made a copy of C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe RoboHelp 10\RoboHTML\WebHelp5Ext\template_stock\whform.js before I edited it. (Right-click the file, click Copy, then right-click in the folder and click Paste. Edit the one that doesn't say Copy in the filename. Then if you want to back it out, delete the one you edited and remove Copy from the original.) If you have your project open in RoboHelp, close it, then reopen it so it can "grab" the new info.
This ought to be in the WebHelp Setting dialog box on the Search pane.
--Karla-- -
Max results returned by a search
Hi there,
I have been struggling in the Content DB Api to find out about the max results returned when performing a search.
Let's say for instance, I am doing a search on attribute NAME = * on a library that potentially contains more than 100 000 documents. I don't mind if the operation is time consuming or not, my main concern is the actual limit. I suppose this is certainly related
to the SOAP message limit. Does anyone know about this ?
I forgot to mention that the search won't request any attribute but only the defaults (id, name, type and so forth ...).
Cheers,Hi
i came across the below reply for a thread with the similar query as above.
<<
Justin Cave
Posts: 10,696
From: Michigan, USA
Registered: 10/11/99
Re: sort data in ref cursor
Posted: Feb 3, 2005 10:30 AM in response to: [email protected] Reply
No. You could sort the data in the SQL statement from which the REF CURSOR was created, but once you have a REF CURSOR, you cannot do anything but fetch from it.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC
>>
So, the results from a ref cursor cant be sorted?? There is no way out?
Kindly advise.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why wont me itunes downlaod to my new sony vaio? i follow all of the steps and have managed to get my itunes onto my ipad and iphone but for some reason nothing appears on the vaio. My original laptop is broken and will no longer switch on which is
-
HT1212 How to unlock my iPad 2 after I forget the password?
How do I unlock my iPad2 if i forgot my password?
-
Flash mx 2004 como justificar texto dinámico?
Hola necesito justificar texto dinámico con flash mx no he podido dar con la solución alguien sabe como hacerlo?
-
After Effects CS6 Extract Error With Screenshot
I recently downloaded the trial version of adobe after effects cs6 but when I try to extract the archive by running the .exe application it ends ups with an error that "A problem occurred while extracting some files. Check available disk space on you
-
Why is a hub needed for ichat a/v locally?
If I'm not mistaken it's currently not possible to create a network by having all nodes except one join the other using adhoc networks and for that machine to act as a router. Why is this the case? Why do I need a router to do ichat a/v b/w computers