MB5B & MRN9 Report showing different values

Hi All,
I am facing a problem when i am running MB5B & MRN9 report on back date, In both the reports stock is displaying correct but there is some difference in value. Material is managed by moving average price. Please provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks
Rashid

hello !
The transaction MRN9 is not designed to display the stock quantities and values for each date in a month. The transaction MRN9 only displays the quantity and value to the 'period end' which refers to entered field 'key date' or displays the actual quantity and value if the 'key date' refers to actual period. These data are selected from database tables MBEW (actual) or MBEWH (historical periods).
If you will get the quantities and values for a special date (not a period end) you should use transaction MB5B which is additional selecting the documents posted until 'selection date' with option 'valuated stock'= 'X'.
The transaction MRN9 provides a comparision of stock values for a selected period end with the values according to 'new calculated price' from functions 'determine lowest value' or 'FIFO-price' and is calculating the 'devaluation value'. This devaluation is normaly done only for a period end date(especially at end of fiscal year).
If your are using the function of 'determine lowest value' (transactions MRN0, MRN1, MRN2, or function 'FIFO-valuation' (transaction MRF1) you can store the calculated 'lowest price' of 'FIFO-price' in one of available fields(tax price1-3, commercial price1-3) in material master. (please see also SAP documentation).
You can also see the notes for this as well.
590699 MRN9 Connection to key date and stock data
486442 Lowest value: Significance of key date
I hope these informations will help to understand the functions of transaction MRN9.
Good luck!
Plauto

Similar Messages

FSV showing different values when executed by different users

Hi Experts,
While executing FSV throug RFBILA00 we are getting different values when executed by differet users. Variant selection is same except the user (which is different). For one user report is perfect for another user some GL accounts were not displayed and some accounts shows different values.
Anybody could help on this. Is there any userwise settings are there.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Narayanan

Hi,
check user authorization, maybe one user has limited display authorization for some values (as they are linked to specific profit center,...)
BR Christian

MC$4 report shows PO value in wrong currency

MC$4 report shows PO value in wrong currency EUR (EURO) eventhough PO
was created with SEK (swiss) currency. Report picks data from info
table S012 that also reflects wrong currency.
Please check attached example....
Currency is getting picked up in table S012 info-structure from company
code table T001 (PO belongs to) not from purchase order.
This is certainly bug in standard SAP LIS report. This is inbuilt LIS feature given by SAP & we cannot do any fixing.
Can you provide solution how we can correct this error. How to display correct currency in report & info-structure S012.

hi
in the report the system might be taking the co code currency
what u have to do is go to MC$4 press ctrl+F7
u will get the currency change option change it to what u want
regrads
kunal
awrad if helpful

Cost element and Line item reports show different actual costs

Hi PS experts,
My client has an issue pertaining to actual cost reports. The cost element report shows actual costs $42,000 for one WBS and when I double click to see details the value it shows is $2100. Even when I checked line item report for this WBS the value is $2100. What could be the reason for getting different values? If some one throw some light on this it would be great helpful to me
Regards,
Laxminarsimha

Laxminarsimha
The values in CJI3 should be correct and will include all postings (e.g. Settlement values) and possibly Actual Revenues unless a filter is in place - so take this as being your correct figure to start with.
Your drilldown will show the same value as CJI3 because it is CJI3
Any cost element report you are using is probably correct for what you are asking - is this a Standard Cost Element Report you are using or is it bespoke
One thing to be careful of when you drilldown on Cost Element Reports is that you do not always get the a make up of the value you have drilled down
e.g.
Cost Element Report was run for Period 1 to 6 2008 and shows £100.00
You drilldown and sometimes the drilldown automatically shows ALL line items e.g £500.00 (not just the values for periods 1 to 6 of 2008 which you may expect £100.00)
In the past I've removed the drilldown capability from bespoke cost element reports to prevent drilldown to the line item report (which is CJI3) because of this problem.
Usually where values for a a number of periods only (not total costs) was required
Other factors to consider
Revenues/Settlements may be excluded from Cost Element Report but will not be excluded from CJI3 unless you specifically restrict
You need to identify which types are postings are missing from the Cost Element Report (what is common...cost element, dr/cr indicator, business transaction)
I've also hit the mistake in the past where I've asked for periods 1 2007 to period 3 2008 and instead of giving me just over a years worth of actual it gave me actuals for periods 1 to 3 for 2007 and 1 to 3 for 2008.
Hope this helps
Steve

"Show List of values" showing different values than "Preview List of values for the same dimension Object

Hi All,
I have a dimension object in Business Layer which is showing a different values than the original database values. When I right click on the object and select "Show List of Values its showing values which are not related to the original values in the database but if I right click on the same object and select "Preview List of Values" it shows the right values present in the database. Any suggestions on how to rectify. It was working good and many reports have been built using that particular dimension.
Is there any way to fix the problem without the deleting the object or recreating another similar object as the object has been used in several reports, so by deleting or recreating the object may break the reports.
Please help!

Hi
A list of values is a list that contains the data values associated with an object, Lists of values inserted in the data foundation are inherited by any business layer based on the data foundation.
Right click on the object and select “Show Values”… Display all the DB values including null
Preview List of Values – also display same values...getting differnece meens...Check weather using any Static List of Values.
If you uncheck the Associated list of values check box "Preview List of Values" options is disabled.
For best practice …LOV is disabled for un-necessary dimension objects
Also If you have Db access check the correct data by
SELECT
Distinct Schema name. Table/View name. Object name
FROM
Schema.name. Table/View name

F.16 showing different values.

Hi All,
As year end activity, when running F.16 in test run, we are getting different values as compared to FS10N. Carry Forward balances are not matching for year 2011. Any idea what can be the possible reason for that?
Parul

F.16 balances should tally with FS10N
First execute the F.16, there is no harm to execute this transaction.
Also make sure which GL account you are checking in FS10N
Rgds
Murali. N

CALCLATED KF SHOWING DIFFERENT VALUES FOR DIFFERENT CURRENCY TYPES

Hi Experts
When I am executing the query( On a Multi provider) with the selection of Company code, controlling area, WBS ELEMENT, currency type I am seeing two different values (XXXX EUROS and YYYY EUROS)for a formula for total variable cost when i select two different currency types( CONTROLLING AREA AND GROUP CURRENCY)
I have two currency types called CONTROLLING AREA CURRENCY and GROUP CURRENCY(BOTH IN EUROS).
This WBS element is not having any sales document.How can I see the exact value for this WBS element in the R3 side.
Is there any possibility that the same dataelement TOTAL VARIABLE COST have different values when i execute with differnt currency types in the selection screen.
In what approach can i proceed from R3 side to the query to solve this issue. on the R3 side when i see in FB03 (settlement posting) for this WBS it is balanced. I am seeing only partial posting for this in the Query
Could any one help me to solve this.
Thanks in Advance
Best regards

Hi Rajesh,
I guess the holiday which was configured in Holiday calendar (Holi) is not declared as Paid holiday in Public Holidays-Holiday Calendar.
Goto SCAL - choose Public Holiday - change mode - look for the holiday (Holi) configured - change mode again - lookout for 'Public Holiday Class' and see whether ' 1 ' is maintained there, if not maintained, type 1 there and save it.
PS (1 - Ordinary Public Holiday....i,e paid holiday).
Now go to PT01 and generate WSR. This will sort out your issue.
If the above is not working,
I guess there are different PSA/ESG grouping for the employees and maybe their Holiday Calendar itself is different. check out whether the PSA and ESG grouping in Time Mgmt is same or different for those employees for whom the paid holiday is not getting generated and also check out the Holiday Calendar for these set of employees and try the above given solution there.
Hope this helps.
regards,
Santhosh
Edited by: Santhosh on Mar 31, 2009 11:34 AM

Report in Crystal reports has different values in Infoview

I have uploaded a Crystal Report into BO Enterprise using the CMC.
The logging into the Infoview to view the report and the results are different to those in the report when run against the same data in Crystal reports.
It is pulling up data, but not the correct figures. I dont know where it is getting its data from.
Any help would be appreciated.

I deleted the ODBC connection and recreated it with a new name.
I then relinked the report in crystal reports, and it suddenly decided to give updated values.
Thanks

Usage Report and Audit Log report showing different totals

I am trying to understand the differences displayed in two similar reports. The first report is an 'Audit Log' Report and it is displaying the number of Resource Account creations over a time period. The second report is a Usage Report using the exact same criteria (objectType = Resource Account and Action = Create). The totals I get back are VASTLY different. Can anyone explain? Is this a known bug?

Hi,
In any report we don't show the storage policies information. In Cost report if the storage policies have different rate factors then we will show the split for the storage information. But in usage report , rate factors will not be applicable as we don''t show the cost details. Hope this clarifies your question. Please let us know if you need more information.
Thanks,
Lakshmi

Sales Reports showing Different Net Sales

Hi All,
Here is three queries, which are sowing different net sales. But both should return same values. Please correct me.
select sum( nvl(c.extended_amount,0) * nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)) SALES
from ra_salesreps a
,ra_customer_trx_all b
,ra_customer_trx_lines c
where a.salesrep_id(+) = b.primary_salesrep_id
and b.customer_trx_id(+) = c.customer_trx_id
and c.line_type='LINE'
AND b.complete_flag like 'Y'
and (b.trx_date between TO_DATE('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
and TO_DATE('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss') )
AND b.primary_salesrep_id = 1040;
SELECT SUM(nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1 )) net_amount,
FROM hz_cust_accounts hca,
hz_parties hp,
ra_customer_trx_all b,
ra_customer_trx_lines_all c,
ra_cust_trx_types_all d
WHERE b.bill_to_customer_id = hca.cust_account_id
AND b.customer_trx_id = c.customer_trx_id
AND b.cust_trx_type_id = d.cust_trx_type_id
AND hca.party_id = hp.party_id (+)
AND c.line_type='LINE'
AND b.invoice_currency_code like 'USD'
AND hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040
AND b.trx_date BETWEEN to_date('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
AND to_date('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
HAVING SUM(DECODE(d.TYPE, 'INV', (nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)), 'DM', (nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)),0 )) BETWEEN TO_NUMBER(-999999999) and TO_NUMBER(999999999);
SELECT
SUM(nvl(y.extended_amount,0)*nvl(x.exchange_rate,1 )) net_amount
FROM hz_cust_accounts hca,
hz_parties hp,
hz_party_sites hps,
hz_cust_acct_sites hcas,
hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsu,
hz_locations hl,
ra_customer_trx_all x,
ra_customer_trx_lines_all y,
ra_cust_trx_types_all z
WHERE hca.party_id = hp.party_id
AND hp.party_id = hps.party_id
AND hcas.party_site_id = hps.party_site_id (+)
AND hps.location_id = hl.location_id (+)
AND x.bill_to_customer_id = hca.cust_account_id(+)
AND hcas.cust_account_id = x.bill_to_customer_id
AND x.customer_trx_id = y.customer_trx_id
AND x.cust_trx_type_id = z.cust_trx_type_id
AND x.ship_to_site_use_id = hcsu.site_use_id(+)
AND hcas.cust_acct_site_id(+) = hcsu.cust_acct_site_id
AND x.invoice_currency_code like 'USD'
AND y.line_type='LINE'
AND x.trx_date BETWEEN TO_DATE('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
AND TO_DATE('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
AND hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040;
Thanks & Regards,

Hello,
The answer from Caveman is correct, the DRB - tcode ALO1 (that is the letter o not a zero) retains some of the document flow of archived data.
Do not use transaction VPAR as that archives data related to preference determination and transaction VF07 does not show document flow.
If you have implemented the PBS modules to view archived data, they retain the document flow information and you can view the data exactlly how it looked before it was archived.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Karin Tillotson

Report Painter report showing wrong values

Hi,
We have a report painter report Y_DN3_47000280 which is Inventory by Plant. We have a plant which is sold out and is not working anymore under the company. But the report is still showing postings and values in tune of 183000...Can you please advise what is wrong and what setting is missing?
Thanks,
Prithwi.

Hi Dianne,
Thanks for the details. We checked MBEW table. There's a mismatch of the values between MBEW and Y_DN3_47000280 report. MBEW contains $109.6 and the Y_DN3_47000280 report contains $180333.00 for the plant.
Can you pls tell from where these values are populating. The plant has been closed 3 months back.
Thanks,
Prithwi.

Polar chart type: show different values

Hello,
I have a polar chart type it would be work pretty good but I have a question. For the chart type I created a query and the result looks so:
<b>Region</b> <b> real Value   calValue</b>
EMEA                 -5%                 95
LATIN                  8,3%               108,3%
For the chart type itself is the calValue e.g. 95 important. But I want to see the Value -5%.
That means the chart type pictures works with the calValue but the User should see the realValues. Is it possible?
Thanks a lot for your help
CU
patty

Check out our sample reports by downloading them. Most have charts to show you how to use them.

Xl reporter shows different result before and after Period-End Closing.

Hi SAP experts,
We have an issue with XL Reporter. When we ran Period-End closing and ran XL - PL Period & YTD (with the same parameters), XLR shows nil in the Actual YTD column and the monthly figures are out by a big difference (example pre-rollover it was $110K after rollover it shows negative $12M).
This happens on 2 different clients running 2 different SAP B1 (2007A PL 42 and 8.8 PL 13) on the same XL Reporter which is possibly the default XL report that comes with the installation.
I don't have any idea why the XLR is running 2 different figures altogether when running the same XLR using the same parameter before and after rolling the year over. The default SAP B1 P&L report stays the same before and after the rollover, I would have expect that the same would happen with the XLR.
Please advise.
Regards,
Didy Arfiono

Hi Julie,
Thanks for the reply. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by excluding a certain transaction for closing entries as this would defeat the whole purpose of PEC which as you stated was to transfer P&L balances to retained earnings account to be carried forward.
I've check at some guides including one from Orchestra Team (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4tUo774eXg) and so far the process that I've done is exactly what it is.
Regards,
Didy

Sy-tabix showing different value each time after ENDLOOP stmt

Hi,
when i am executing my program its having one loop statement . after finishing that loop
below the Endloop statement.
sy-tabix some time showing 1 and some time showing 2.
why its chaging its value

Hi,
As per SAP online help on [LOOP statement|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/EN/fc/eb381a358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm]
When you leave the loop, SY-TABIX has the same value as when you entered it.
So the value you are seeing in Sy-tabix after endloop is because of some internal table operations before the starting of that loop.
You can check this by comparing the sy-tabix value before first Loop pass and after last loop pass.
Hope this helps you.
regards
Karthik D

F.19 report showing wrong values (GR/IR)

Hello,
At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. However, when the F.19 transaction is run to analyze the GR/IR clearing account, there are some old PO's belonging to year 2005/2006 that still show up in the report. When these PO's are checked, there is no GR/IR variance.
Could someone please explain the reason for this and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
Thanks in advance,
Rugmani.

Hi,
This is the wrong forum for this
Rgds,
Richard

MB5B & MRN9 Report showing different values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for