MD04 CO09 discrepancy

Hi Experts.
We have a situation with a component ATP where the system appears to offer much more availability than is visible in MD04. When I have looked in CO09 there are several overdue stock transport orders (the ATP check is set to consider overdue receipts) These STO's are not visible in MD04 (or in APO). When I have investigated, I discovered that all the STO's had been closed using the Final Delivery Indicator - CO09 is showing the "outstanding" part of the STO.
I could just change the ATP check to exclude receipts in the past but in general the business wishes them to be considered. Also, I could set the Delivery Completed Indicator but there are an awful lot of these STO's!
This situation doesn't seem to me to be correct. Is there a way to stop ATP considering these STO's with the FDI set, whilst allowing genuine open over due receipts to be considered?
Many thanks
Chris

Hi Experts
I refreshed the in MD04 and re run md02 even then the order number is not seen MDo4 and co09 after the item 40 changed with diffrent material code and quantity. first instance when I create the order with a Material it is seen in Md04,but afte going to Va02 and changing the line item with a diffrent Material and quantity is not seen
Please advise what other settings I need to check.
Thanks In advance.

Similar Messages

  • Delivery cannot be created (only 0 qty of material available )

    Hello All,
    I have created a sales order for material A on plant B for  one qty. The delivery date is 29.12.10 but the system has confirmed the schedule line with a delivery date of 3.1.11. The material availibilty date is  28.12.10.
    But when I create the delivery, the system gives message, "Delivery cannot be created (only 0 qty of material available )".
    I have checked MMBE and CO09 , there is a stock of qty 2 for material A for plant B. Also there is no other sales order consuming the stock in CO09 for material A in plant B.
    The schedule line catergory is CN(not relevant for MRP)  in sales order and that is why I cannot see sales order requirement in Md04/Co09. But in any case since the stock is available, the system confirmed the schedule line for 3.1.11 in sales order as said above.
    While creating delivery, we are giving a delivery date of 28.12.10 (equal to material availibity date ). I have not checked the availibilty check group but even if checking group= no check, still I think ,the system will confirm schedule line since stock is available and it has confirmed stock in sales order as said above
    But still we cannot create delivery and receives the error, "Delivery cannot be created (only 0 qty of material available )"
    Pls help.
    regds
    Pamela

    Hi Pamela,
    It seems that material A is not available in plant B on 28.12.2010 even if the stock is shown as 2 qty in MMBE
    Please go to MMBE place the cursor on storage location and the check the Warehouse stock for that material.
    It may be that material qty 2 which is currently shown in stock overview is lying in interim storage type 916 against some goods movement (601) issued against some other sales order.
    Also check whether negative stock are allowed in that storage type. In your case , I think they are not allowed.
    I hope this helps
    Br,
    Tushar

  • Error in confirmed qty after V_V2 update

    Hi Experts
    This is a very strange issue im facing. The scenario is as explained:
    The moment, there is an inward delivery in the warehouse, the user runs the rescheduling program V_V2 to update the confirmed quantity of backorders.
    The problem here is, the confirmed quantity of the main item in material substitution is wrongly updated as completely confirmed even thoug the sum of the confirmed quantities in the sub items is not equal to the order quantity.
    Example:
    Item 10 of sales order created for 50 NOS on 21.04.2011.
    Due to material substitution, Item 11 and item 12 are generated for 20 NOS and 30 NOS respectively
    21.04.2011
    Item          Ord Qty        Rounded Qty          Confirmed Qty     Item Category
      Item 10      50                    50                         20                              TAX
      Item 11      20                    20                         20                              TAPS
      Item 12      30                    30                         00                              TAPS
    Looks fine till here.
    25.04.2011 - V_V2 run by the user.
    Item          Ord Qty        Rounded Qty          Confirmed Qty     Item Category
      Item 10      50                    50                         50                              TAX
      Item 11      20                    20                         20                              TAPS
      Item 12      30                    30                         00                              TAPS
    Here as you can see, the confirmed Qty of the main item is changed to 50 even though stock not available.
    Due to this, orders which have these issues are appearing in the delivery due list in VL10A, though they dont have stock available to deliver the goods.
    I have checked in MD04, CO09 and checked every other settings related to availability check but in vain.
    I even tried CO06 to change the confirmed quantities, but only the sub items are appearing in the list there.
    Please advise what needs to be done.
    Thanks & Regards
    Madhu
    Edited by: Madhu Naidu on May 2, 2011 12:51 PM
    Edited by: Madhu Naidu on May 2, 2011 2:17 PM

    Hi Marian
    Thanks for your response.
    I checked OVZ9 and there only reservations, sales reqmts and deliveries are ticked for inward/outward movments.
    Yes you are right that in rule 02 / RP, it considers all movements. In that case why only the confirmed qty of the main item is updated incorrectly and the sub items are not. And how to avoid this as this is including order items (orders) without physical stock also in the delivery due list in VL10A.
    Thanks & Regards
    Madhu

  • Product allocation assignments with rejection code and delivery block

    Hi,
    During the allocation of AFS material, system is rejecting the schedule line with a rejection code (J0 - ATP). However the stock is sufficiently available. Hence the line item is getting unconfirmed.
    Kindly suggest.

    I never worked in AFS.
    Try the following;
    -Check whether the sales order is credit blocked or not -t.code VKM1
    - Check the stock in MD04/CO09. May be the quantities are allocated to other orders/deliveries.
    -Also check OSS Note 1101699 - Schedule lines are rejected when the checking rule is KP - I am not sure whether this applies to your scenario.
    Regards,

  • Schedule order confirm quanity check

    Hello ,
    We are  facing a problem, that is when we create an order in CRM 2007, we are not able to see confirmed quantity check against the schedule line because of this order is not able to be processed
    how can this problem  be solved .
    regards .

    Hello sir,
    In CO06,
    for one xxxxx matrial & plant,
    Different value in different field is
    Receipt qnty. in which i have stock = 24mt (My total stock)
    Issue qnty. = 24mt (Means this much stock should reserved against SD document)
    Confirm issue = 24mt
    If above value in CO06- field that means i have issued 24mt to any document
    In detail item screen system should show that from which document it is confirmed but it is not showing
    It is only showing in MRP element tab ---> SD totals record --> 24mt
    But not showing any document number.
    So when we go to create sales order then system not getting confirm quantity
    However we can see the available quantity in MMBE,MD04 & CO09. (Also not any open SO/Delivery)

  • MD04 and CO09 are not matching after EHP5 upgrade

    Hi all,
    we have changed to ECC6 EHP5 and now we have the following problem:
    When we are using transaction CO09 we are not able to see old purchase orders.
    When we are going into the purchase order and change the quantity, they will appear in the CO09.
    In MD04 everything looks like befor the EHP upgrade.
    Any ideas?
    Kind Regards
    Dirk
    Edited by: Dirk Drössel on Jul 20, 2011 12:35 PM

    Thanks a lot, that was the solution.
    Regards
    Dirk

  • MD04 and CO09

    Hi,
    Could you tell me difference between transaction MDp4 and CO09 ?
    how these transaction can be used?

    Hi,
    MD04 displays only the requirements, the CO09 displays the availability situation.
    therefore there is a difference what date is displayed.
    in MD04:
        a) from issuing plant perspective: mbdat of the required schedule line
        b) from receiving plan perspective: GR date of the confirmed schedule line
    in CO09 both required and confirmed schedule lines are displayed on issuing plant side.
    br, Gabor

  • MD04 - Delivery Date shown as per 1st schedule line in Purchase order

    HI ,
    we have an issue in one of our client related to Purchase order .see detials below.
    we have maintained the configuration " E " under STO configuration with the combinaiton of Purchase order type , Delivery type ,Checking Rule .
    SPRO = Material Management = Purchasing = Purchase order - Setup stcok stransfer order - Assig delivery type to checking rule
    we have assign the E = Display the delivery proposal with dailog box under feild " Rules adoption for ATP check "
    it means that when you create the Purchase order with Qty then system will propose an new screen with delivery proposal.
    we need to select one which would like.
    once you select it system will display to schedule line items for line item in Purchase order.
    first schedule line item delivery date will be calcualted based on the Planned delivery time
    second delivery date will be calculated based on the Route determiantion ( Note this functionaity will be avialble in Ecc 6 and may be in 4.7ee also )
    so now issue is when we see MD04 system is showing first schedule line delivery date in MD04, it was suppose to show the second scheduline delivery , but it is not happening .
    why ?  is it STD behaviour ?
    pls check it and suggestme

    Hello,
    We are also experiencing this issue in ECC 6.0 with the first schedule line showing as the delivery date in the receiving plant in MD04.  In our case, we have sales orders that are placed on the distribution centers, and that triggers an STO to be generated for shipment from the Source plant to the DC to fulfill the Sales order demand.
    We have also noticed that in CO09 for the receiving plant, the committed dates are not displayed, so ATP is incorrectly calculated at the distribution center when rescheduling changes the committed dates in the STO due to a change in material availability.
    Has anyone been able to find any solutions or additional findings to workaround this issue?  I see that SAP development will be taking a look at this but that was last updated in May of 2011.  I have not been able to find any other additional information on OSS that addresses this issue.
    Thank you,
    Tina
    Original Post from pentakota srini:
    "HI,
    We have an issue in one of our client related to Purchase order .see details below.
    We have maintained the configuration " E " under STO configuration with the combination of Purchase order type , Delivery type ,Checking Rule .
    SPRO = Material Management = Purchasing = Purchase order - Setup stock transfer order - Assign delivery type to checking rule
    we have assign the E = Display the delivery proposal with dialog box under field " Rules adoption for ATP check "
    it means that when you create the Purchase order with Qty then system will propose an new screen with delivery proposal.
    we need to select one which would like.
    once you select it system will display to schedule line items for line item in Purchase order.
    first schedule line item delivery date will be calculated based on the Planned delivery time
    second delivery date will be calculated based on the Route determination ( Note this functionality will be available in ECC 6 and may be in 4.7ee also )
    so now issue is when we see MD04 system is showing first schedule line delivery date in MD04, it was suppose to show the second schedule line delivery , but it is not happening .
    why ? is it STD behavior ?
    pls check it and suggest me"

  • To add two new fields in CO09 SCREEN

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement of adding two new fields  Customer Name and Number (Sold to party) for the MRP Elements IN CO09 Screen which is already there in MD04.
    Please let me know as soon as possible if any one has any idea regarding this.

    Hi All,
    I have the same issue. Any solution already in sight?
    KR,
    Martin

  • Query on CO09

    Hi All,
    I have a situation wherein for a particular material if I run CO09, system is providing me the details. Now, in the oveview screen I can see some stock as a confirmed stock against "Delivery". But, I am not able to find out the delivery number against which this stock has been confirmed. I have checked all the relevant tables to find it out... but in vein.
    I can only see the date in "Date" column just before the "MRP Element" column.
    Can someone throw some light on this.
    Hrishi

    Hi Lakshmipathi,
    The delivery was created against a STO, also to note that the requirement of this delivery is not reflecting in MD04.
    Some more info is > the affected material {which is there in the delivery} is always transferred with a STO from one company to other company. So, the deliveries for this material always takes place with ref .to STO not against a Sales Order at any given time.
    Now, my query is where I can see the confirmations {which I can see in CO09} against this delivery ? which table or from which transactions ?
    I hope I've provided enough information regarding this case , but if you still have any doubts do let me know so that I can provide more info about this.
    Hrishi

  • What is the relevence of MD04 for SD and what r the things we hav to look

    what is the relevence of MD04 for SD and what r the things we hav to look

    Hi Venkata,
    MD04 will show a collection of the incoming and outgoing stock changes.
    And for SD, it will display the content in table VBBE and VBBS (single requirement and total requirement).
    The content was updated when the schedule line category is configured as relevant for requirement transfer.
    And I often use MD04 together with CO09 to estimate/check a ATP checking result.
    Hope this could do help!
    Hongyan

  • Qty difference between "mmbe" and "/afs/md04" transaction?

    Dear Gurus,
    When I am checking MMBE txn for a material, it is showing me 201 qty in Unrestricted stock(batch)..
    but when I am checking in "/afs/md04" txn, it is showing me 55 qty for Unrestricted stock(batch)..
    why is this discrepancy?
    pls help..

    I assume you are only checking for the "A" tab and comparing only the batch stock ( Stock type - C) , /AFS/MD04 is a stock and requirement list and MMBE is a stock report , if you have compared only the batch stock , might be you can run the report /AFS/SDRQ to check for inconsistency , Hope this helps...
    Arun

  • Qty doubling in CO09

    HI experts
    Quantity is showing double or more in CO09.
    There are also 2 arrival dates showing in Co09 for this same STO (2/18 & 2/25).
    experts please suggest
    Rajakiran

    Hi Raja,
    Please move this thread to this space:
    SAP ERP Manufacturing - Production Planning (SAP PP)
    Also, check if you have different schedule lines in the PO at item level. So you could have the same item with partial deliveries: one quantity to be received on 2/18 and another quanitty on 2/25.
    Finally, if the issue is not explained with my previous comment, could please share the screenshots of CO09 and MD04?
    Kind Regards,
    Mariano

  • Implementing BADI MD_ADD_COL_EZPS for MD04 custom column

    Hi there,
    I'm using BADI MD_ADD_COL_EZPS to display 3 new buttons and three new columns in MD04.
    For each line item that is displayed, the custom column is filled, after the button is hit -This works fine.
    My Question is:
    Is there any way to limit the value that is filled into the new column so that it only appears on the FIRST line item/row?
    (At the moment it is repeated all the way down the page - the new value is a material characteristic, so doesn't change, will always be the same for each line)
    I've looked at all the available structures/tables in the FILL_ADD_COLUMNS method of the BADI, and none seem suitable
    to determine the "first" row. (ie. something like the way SY-TABIX or SY-INDEX might be used)
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    David.

    Hi Shubhendu,
    in the method 'ACTIVATE_ADD_COLUMNS', you can set the flag EZ1_MODE to '1' to make the first column visible always. (it's been a while, but I think setting it to '2' makes it visible when the button is pressed.)
    Same applies to EZ2_MODE for second column, EZ3_MODE for third.
    look at the flags/parameters in this method, and also in FILL_ADD_COLUMNS, to fill the data.
    here you need to fill structure EMDEZX_USEX1 (for column 1) etc.
    The code is hit for each record displayed in MD04
    Hopefully this helps you.
    Regards,
    David

  • MD04 release reject problem

    Sir in MD04 when i am converting planned order to production order i am getting following message also release is rejecting :-
    No valuation variant found for valuation area AMBA
    Message no. C6015
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find a valid valuation variant for valuation area AMBA.
    If the valutaion variant is not assigned to a valuation area, this will have the following effect on the valuation of the goods receipt of the finished product:
    u2022     If the price control indicator in the material master of the finished product is S, it will lead to price differences.
    u2022     If the price control indicator in the material master of the finished product is V, the goods receipt will be regarded as a delivery free of charge.
    Procedure
    Assign a valuation variant to valuation area AMBA in the configuration menu.
    Can u please tell me in which tcode i have to do customization to overcome above error message.
    I online wait.

    Dear,
    You must  check the maintenance of "Valuation variants for order  (Transaction OPK9)", which you can also access via the Customizing path "Production --> Production orders --> Integration --> Define valuation of goods received":it may be that an assignment valuation area - valuation variant is missing."
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

Maybe you are looking for