MD06  Issue - Planned orders not getting displayed

Hello,
Planned order with the exception "Newly created order proposal" does not get displayed in MD06 with the option "Only Unprocessed MRP Lists" in the processing indicator.
I am running MD06 report with the following parameters:
Plant
MRP Controller
Exeception Group - All exception selected except 8-Terminations
Processing indicator - Only unprocessed MRP LIsts, Only with new exceptions
My material which has a newly created planned order thorugh MRP run with exception "1 - Newly created order proposal" does not get displayed.
Only when I specify Only processed MRP lists or All MRP LIst in the processing indicator, this material gets displayed. The planned order is for a Stock Transfer order to this plant (receiving plant). How is the MRP LIst processed?
Please help me out with this issue.
Sincerely,
Ketan

Hi Ketan,
When you execute the MD06 report, you would find a column with the heading CI, if am right it would be just after the MRP cntlr, here you would find a Pencil & a tick mark. If you find them both, it means the row is unprocessed, but if you find only a tick mark it means that the row is processed.
So now check for the planned order, it would be just a tick mark & hence would be showing only for the processed MRP list or all MRP lists.
To process a row or unprocess, just click on the icon & it changes.
Check & revert if it answers your query.
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

  • Planned order not getting generated for FG

    Dear Experts,
    Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
    And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
    Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sampath
    Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

    Dear,
    In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
    Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
    Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
    So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
    Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
    Check and revert back.\
    Regards,
    Alok Tiwari

  • Planning is not getting displayed under shared services

    I have installed essbase,Bi Plus and Planning.Esbase and Bi Plus were configured and were successful.I have completed the configuration of planning also the product instance and Data source step.
    When i log on to shared services i am not seeing the planning and also the "Navigate-->Application" menu is missing in the workspace.
    I have installed 9.3.1
    Thanks,
    Mugundhan

    Hi John,
    Thanks for the help.I missed to furnish that i have created app using the app wizard.I dont know how this issue got fixed, i have restarted the servers and now i can see the planning app under shared services but still i am not getting the planning menu in the workspace. I have provisioned the full rights to the login id. I think i am missing some point here.
    Thanks,
    Mugundhan

  • Planned order not getting generated at plant level

    Hi experts,
          When i run MRP for a particular plant in T- code (MD01) Planned order is not getting generated but when MRP is done against a material in T - code (MD02) in the same plant planned order gets generated... Is there any customizing  to generate planned order in plant level.....
    Regards,
    Joseph.
    Edited by: joseph5885 on Aug 12, 2010 9:23 AM

    Dear Joseph,
    No it is not recommended. only in emergance cases this will be done
    Usually in MDRE and MDAB will be scheduled before MRP run at background for inconistancies in planning file enries
    So the above said t-codes will take care of the same
    Added
    Refer this link
    [Planning file entry;
    Regards
    Madhu
    Edited by: K.Madhu Kumar on Aug 12, 2010 6:53 AM

  • Planned orders not getting generated

    Hi friends,
    we are running material level MRP  MD02 (make to `order scenario).
    when we run MRP instead of generating planned orders, it is generating Purchase requisition . i can see purchase requisition generated instead of planned orders in MD04 screen.(we are facing problem with only one material).BOM of FERT Contains 3 HALB.all the mrp parameters have been maintained.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi
    1. Since you are telling it is MTO scenario you need to use the MD50
    2. Also in the MRP screen check the Create Purchase Reqn try the setting   "" 3     Planned orders"""
    3. As you have mentioned only for that particular material - kindly check if any scheduling margin key has been maintained. ??
    check and revert back
    Reg
    dsk

  • BOM is not getting displayed in case of centralized planning plant.

    Dear All,
    there are 2 plants for which we have centralized planning. the users have created Equipment BOM for the two plants. but in case of the second plant for which the planning plant is different from the maintenance plant, the BOM is not getting displayed in the Maintenance Order (i.e. in the components tab).
    kindly through some light on it. whether i have to do some settings for it.
    Regards,
    Ritesh Kapoor

    Hi,
    Yes while using IH01, i have ticked the BOM explosion option, but when i am giving the plant there then only it is displaying the BOM of that equipment.
    Also when i am creating an order for the same equipment, then it does not displays the BOm & shows the message which i have written in my previous mail.
    Ritesh

  • Purchase order no not getting displayed in FBL3N for doucment type RE

    Dear all,
    We have done a settings in FBL3N t.code. We have added BSEG-EBELN in the special fields and saved the layout. The purpose is to make the purchase order number to display when we are executing line item display for GR/IR clearing and Cenvat clearing gl account. Purchase order number is correctly getting displayed in Gr/ir clearing account. But in cenvat clearing gl account the transactions that are related to doucment type SA(that is J1IEX transaction), the purchase order number is getting displayed, but in the transactions that are related to document type RE(MIRO transactions), the purcahse order number is not getting displayed.
    We have checked the BSEG table for the gl account. The purchase order number is not getting updated for the MIRO transactions in the cenvat clearing gl account.
    Please suggest us so that the above issue can be solved.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anand

    Hi,
    Could you please add field BSEG-EBELN as a special field in FBL3N (from menu path Settings -> Special fields). Then, select the Purchase order field again from "Change Layout" (Ctrl+F8). Now this field is available for display variants, it has the technical name 1-U_EBELN and the description 'Purchase Document'. The other field has the same description but as technical name
    '1-EBELN'. When you create a display variant be aware that you select 1-U_EBELN and not 1-EBELN.
    Please also refer to note 215798.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Planned Independent Requirement Not getting displayed in MD04

    Hi,
       I am assigning material to nwa and doing advance procurement by using procurement type PIR. Reservation is getting created after release of activity but the same is not getting displayed in MD04.
    The items of the reservation are getting displayed in MB23.
    what could be the reason for this?
    Regards,
    B P Singh

    Hi,
    Planned Independent requirements (PI) are normally configured for consumption by 'Dependent' requirements. Hence the PIR would have been replaced by the reservation from 'dependent' requirement. You can test and verify the same in development system.
    Regards
    Murali

  • I am facing issue in Receiving incoming calls, Name not getting displayed though the same has been saved in my phone book!! I have done sync from Windows contacts.. please help if some1 knows how to rectify the issue...

    I am facing issue in Receiving incoming calls, Name not getting displayed though the same has been saved in my phone book!! I have done sync from Windows contacts.. please help if some1 knows how to rectify the issue...

    Has your carrier been having issues with Call Display? Do the telephone numbers come up when people call, or does it just show 'Unknown Number' or 'Blocked' ?

  • Index keywords not getting displayed in alphabetical order

    Greetings to one and all!!1
    Why the keywords defined in my index folder, is not getting
    displayed in alphabetical order..what option am i missing to set??
    can anyone help me to achieve this!!!
    Thankx

    Hi all
    In addition to what Colum offered, if you choose to keep a
    non-binary index (those are my particular preference) you may
    right-click the index and sort the terms. (Inside RoboHelp, not in
    the compiled output)
    Just a thought... Rick

  • SC history update problem:PO from PR not getting displayed in SC history

    Hi
    We are on EBP 3.5,Classic scenario.
    PR's get created in R/3 backend and then are manually converted into PO.This entire cycle is shown in EBP SC history tab.However for some of the SC's we are seeing status only up to PR stage(PO no. is not getting displayed either in BBP_PD or check status txn).When we try manual status updation thru BBP_GET_STATUS_2,it throws an error saying,"these references neither GUID nor destination,thus could not be assigned to any system not even local system".
    Has anyone faced such an issue.Pl reply
    Regards
    Sanjeev

    Hi
    <u>I am not sure, is it happening for Catalog Item, free text item, or limit item in your case.</u>
    <b>Have you tried executing report CLEAN_REQREQ_UP ? What all errors appear in RZ20 Transaction, when this dump happens. ? </b>
    <u>Please have a look at the following OSS Notes, which deals with the same symptoms, you told in your response.</u>
    <b>Note 1005373 - BBPSC04: Purchase order details missing in history for STO
    Note 728894 - Creation date of the PReq in the history
    Note 989891 - BBP_GET_STATUS_2: Incorr quantity determination in back end
    Note 1023706 - Follow-on Documents Show Wrong Net-Price and Net-Value.
    Note 886099 - History: Short dump during the product conversion
    Note 925480 - Short dump in history of a purchase order
    Note 1006898 - Deleted vendor not displayed in Change hist of Shopping cart
    Note 994379 - History page:wrong exchange rate is used
    Note 725920 - Incorrect display in follow-on docs of limit shopping carts
    Note 953238 - Shopping cart history in the sourcing cockpit
    Note 949162 - Follow-on documents exist, status I1111 and I1113 active
    Note 890859 - Status/shopping cart/error message without text
    Note 927585 - GI slip and cancellation are missing in the history
    Note 730239 - Check status: Missing Backend reference
    Note 625121 - PO Ack not displayed in Check Status
    Note 758522 - Check Status: Follow-on documents in the list and history
    Note 532709 - Shop with Limit: Backend PO after requisition is not found
    Note 515475 - EBP/BBP Status BE Requis.: Probl. with Limit / UoM
    Note 555183 - EBP 3.0: Not all references found after 550783
    Note 957957 - BBPIV03:doesn't find POs when deliv.date is set
    Note 787786 - Archived PReq and reservations are missing in history
    Note 812564 - The ordered quantity of the BE-PO is not read
    Note 943679 - Termination or incorrect conversion after Note 812564</b>
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Total is not getting displayed in the ALV output.

    Hi,
    Total is not getting displayed in the ALV output.
    I m using :REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND & REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_DISPLAY
    Are  there any issues with it as the same settings are working fine with REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY
    source code:
    DATA: layout TYPE slis_layout_alv,
          IT_eventS  TYPE slis_t_event,
          fcat   TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv WITH HEADER LINE,
          rec_fcat TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv WITH HEADER LINE.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_tab,
          belnr TYPE dberchz-belnr,
          belzart TYPE dberchz-belzart,
          net TYPE dberchz-nettobtr,
          END OF ty_tab.
    DATA: lt_tab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_tab.
    SELECT belnr belzart nettobtr
      FROM dberchz
      INTO TABLE lt_tab[]
    WHERE belnr eq '000000000001'.
      if sy-subrc ne 0.
      ENDIF.
    *  defining layout
    layout-colwidth_optimize = 'X'.
    layout-def_status = 'X'.
    *defning event
    *event
    *defining field catalog
    fcat-col_pos = 1.
    fcat-fieldname = 'BELNR'.
    fcat-tabname  = 'LT_TAB'.
    APPEND fcat.
    fcat-col_pos = 2.
    fcat-fieldname = 'BELZART'.
    fcat-tabname  = 'LT_TAB'.
    APPEND fcat.
    fcat-col_pos = 3.
    fcat-fieldname = 'NET'.
    fcat-tabname  = 'LT_TAB'.
    fcat-do_sum = 'X'.
    APPEND fcat.
    *calling alv
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_INIT'
      EXPORTING
        i_callback_program             = 'YZ_PLR'
    *   I_CALLBACK_PF_STATUS_SET       = ' '
    *   I_CALLBACK_USER_COMMAND        = ' '
    *   IT_EXCLUDING                   =
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND'
      EXPORTING
        is_layout                        = layout
        it_fieldcat                      = fcat[]
        i_tabname                        = 'LT_TAB'
        it_events                        = IT_EVENTS[]
    *   IT_SORT                          =
    *   I_TEXT                           = ' '
      tables
        t_outtab                         = lt_tab[]
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   PROGRAM_ERROR                    = 1
    *   MAXIMUM_OF_APPENDS_REACHED       = 2
    *   OTHERS                           = 3
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_DISPLAY'
    Thanks,
    Gaurav

    Hi
    No I don't think, this is my code (based on your code) and it works fine:
    TYPE-POOLS SLIS.
    DATA: BEGIN OF LT_TAB OCCURS 0,
           BELNR LIKE BSEG-BELNR,
           GJAHR LIKE BSEG-GJAHR,
           WRBTR LIKE BSEG-WRBTR,
           WAERS LIKE BKPF-WAERS,
          END OF LT_TAB.
    DATA: LAYOUT     TYPE SLIS_LAYOUT_ALV,
          IT_EVENTS  TYPE SLIS_T_EVENT,
          FCAT       TYPE SLIS_T_FIELDCAT_ALV WITH HEADER LINE,
          REC_FCAT   TYPE SLIS_T_FIELDCAT_ALV WITH HEADER LINE.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
      FCAT-COL_POS       = 1.
      FCAT-FIELDNAME     = 'BELNR'.
      FCAT-TABNAME       = 'LT_TAB'.
      FCAT-REF_FIELDNAME = 'BELNR'.
      FCAT-REF_TABNAME   = 'BSEG'.
      APPEND FCAT.
      FCAT-COL_POS       = 2.
      FCAT-FIELDNAME     = 'GJAHR'.
      FCAT-TABNAME       = 'LT_TAB'.
      FCAT-REF_FIELDNAME = 'GJAHR'.
      FCAT-REF_TABNAME   = 'BSEG'.
      APPEND FCAT.
      FCAT-COL_POS       = 3.
      FCAT-FIELDNAME     = 'WRBTR'.
      FCAT-TABNAME       = 'LT_TAB'.
      FCAT-CFIELDNAME    = 'WAERS'.
      FCAT-REF_FIELDNAME = 'WRBTR'.
      FCAT-REF_TABNAME   = 'BSEG'.
      FCAT-DO_SUM        = 'X'.
      APPEND FCAT.
      FCAT-COL_POS       = 4.
      FCAT-FIELDNAME     = 'WAERS'.
      FCAT-TABNAME       = 'LT_TAB'.
      FCAT-REF_FIELDNAME = 'WAERS'.
      FCAT-REF_TABNAME   = 'BKPF'.
      FCAT-DO_SUM        = SPACE.
      APPEND FCAT.
      SELECT * FROM BSEG INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_TAB
        WHERE BUKRS = 'MAAB'
          AND BELNR = '0000000001'.
      LT_TAB-WAERS = 'EUR'.
      MODIFY LT_TAB FROM LT_TAB TRANSPORTING WAERS WHERE WAERS = SPACE.
    *CALLING ALV
      CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_INIT'
        EXPORTING
          I_CALLBACK_PROGRAM = 'ZPROVAMAX5'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND'
        EXPORTING
          IS_LAYOUT   = LAYOUT
          IT_FIELDCAT = FCAT[]
          I_TABNAME   = 'LT_TAB'
          IT_EVENTS   = IT_EVENTS[]
        TABLES
          T_OUTTAB    = LT_TAB[].
      CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_DISPLAY'.
    I've also inserted a currency field
    Max

  • '@' not getting displayed in the ALV report

    Hello,
    I am facing  a strange issue in the ALV report display. A string starting with '@' is not getting displayed and says "default icon " on the report. and this is varying from system to system for the same user.
    can anyone please help me in resolving the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Santhosh Guptha N.

    @ is a default value as per ALV internal process. This is used in icons .
    I think this is causing the confusion.
    Check in the fieldcat if there is any adjsutment to be made to handle this.
    Br,
    Vijay

  • Default Value is not getting displayed in SUN ONE Ldap

    Hello,
    I have created an attribute in slapd.user_at.conf and it is associated in slapd.user_oc.conf.
    The attribute default value is given through SUN ONE Console. But, In our application the default value is not getting displayed.
    We need the default value to run our applicatin. Can anyone help me for this issue
    Regards,
    K. Senthil Kumar

    Hi anandkumar,
    I belive this issue can be resolved by changing the  Query proprties for the perticular field.
    Kindly check the Field proerties in query designer and ensure that Text is enabled ather than Key.
    __Field property check up:__Go to query designer->click onn the field-> Right hand side in properties click on display tab-> select Text in drop down menu of Display as tab.
    FURTHER CHECK UP: check the master data avaiulability for the perticular info object, if masterdata is not available, do the text data for txt data availability in report level.
    Hope this helps you!!
    Best Regards,
    Maruthi

  • Work item not getting displayed in the portal

    Hi  experts,
    We are creating a protoype for one of the standard HCM form for change in working time. When we initiate the process, the workflow is supposed to identify the agent(which is the manager in this case) and push the work item in the inbox of the manager.
    In our issue, we are able to see the workitem in SAP inbox, but the same work item is not getting displayed in the portal.
    If we try to approve from the SAP inbox, the hard coded message u201CWork item can only be executed using the Portal and the UWLu201D comes. [this comes through the method of  one of the tasks 17900101 which we are using for approving the form]
    We commented the message by using a Z class. Now we donu2019t get the hardcoded message, but still the workflow does not complete from here.
    Can this be aan integration issue of the workflow tasks with the portal??Can someone elaborate on this??

    <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS17900101.SAP_ECC" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchWebDynPro" executionMode="default">
          <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC" externalType="TS17900101" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
          <Actions>
            <Action name="launchWebDynPro" groupAction="" handler="SAPWebDynproLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
              <Properties>
                <Property name="WebDynproApplication" value="ApproveFormApp"/>
                <Property name="WebDynproDeployableObject" value="sap.com/pa~asr~formstep"/>
                <Property name="newWindowFeatures" value="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no"/>
                <Property name="openInNewWindow" value="yes"/>
                <Property name="display_order_priority" value="5"/>
              </Properties>
              <Descriptions default=""/>
            </Action>
          </Actions>
        </ItemType>
    You have to say to your portal team to modify their XML file as above. In simple you hvae to configure the task in the portal and in the SWFVISU txn as follows with the following vizualization parameters
    Task TS17900101 and visualization type is JavaWebDynpro
    APPLICATION     ApproveFormApp
    PACKAGE     sap.com/pa~asr~formstep

Maybe you are looking for