Medicare additional tax rate (.9%) for employees with wages over 200K

Has anyone successfully applied the necessary ESU's? It seems there has been a few ESU's regarding this issue and I would appreciate any insight that can be shared.
Thanks.

Hello,
Please log a service request and the specific scenario and we will review it.
Regards,
Elena

Similar Messages

ESS - Own data dumps. Only for employees with PERSG "L"

Some employees are getting a "Serious error" in own data in ESS.
I get runtime error OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED_NO in function FUNCTION hrxss_per_cleanup. The error is mentioned several times in the forum:
Done several analysis, and found the following:
I registered 3 identical employees with different PERSG/PERSK:
1. 1/01
2. L/66
3. V/01
I connected my portal user to the 3 different employees and found:
1. Works fine
2. Dumps
3. Works fine
So now my theoriy is that somehow the value "L" is misinterpreted by the system.
Can anyone tell me if this can be the case, and if so, if it is a product issue?
I don't know where to look for the error (esp. since I am not a Java person)
Any help appreciated
Kirsten

The problem was that the person belonged to a payroll area where there was no admin.record. (Payroll not run for this employee). This causes Own Data to fail, as it is checking the status of admin record - probably to decide eg. when bank can be updated.

Additional fields in report for form with report

Hello,
I got the problem, that I want to create a form with report where the form only changes the values of one table but the report is also using additional fields linked from another table. If I take a view with all fields for my form with report, the form is about all fields and not only about those from the first table. So is there a way to have another table linked to the form than to the report and get a link between them by a key?
I hope that someone has got a great idea and can help me solving this.
Thanks
Jochen

Jochen,
you can create a form with report on the view and afterwards you change the SQL-query into a query on the view. Take care that the original column names remain the same. You get your extra columns in the report and your link to the form remains,
good luck,
DickDral

Search in Taleo for employees with appropriate knowledge/skills for requisitions

When for instance Fusion HCM and TEE are integrated and employees are also available in TEE, can a recruiter then search amongst the employees for potential candidates for a requisition, even if this employee has not applied for the job?

In system terms you would be converting a load of employees to contractors and the ramifications are obvious; any pending transactions would have to be backed out, rolled back in again.
I would bite the bullet on this one and simply convert all your various Emp Variants (i.e., all the true CWKs who are currently EMPs on the system with a user person type) to the system CWK type on a given cut off date some time in the future. And I don't know of a way to do this other than do a mass termination and then create placement. This will sound very unpalateable to you right now but I reckon that if you proceed down a route of changing historical data, you'll hit more unseen problems down the road.
Anyway, interesting question, it would be good if you could relay your findings or outcomes to the forum.

How to deal with Tax Rate Changes

Dear All,
Suppose we have one tax code XY with tax rate 10.30 %.
And after budget it gets changed to suppose 12.36% from 10.30%, so in that case how to deal with this situation.
Do we need to create new tax code or we should do the changes in existing tax code.
Also if we have open PO's with old tax code, what will we the effect in those PO's for both the cases (with new tax code or changes in existing tx code).
Thanks
Vijay

Dear All,
Suppose we have one tax code XY with tax rate 10.30 %.
And after budget it gets changed to suppose 12.36% from 10.30%, so in that case how to deal with this situation.
Do we need to create new tax code or we should do the changes in existing tax code.
Also if we have open PO's with old tax code, what will we the effect in those PO's for both the cases (with new tax code or changes in existing tx code).
Thanks
Vijay
If you change the existing tax code, all the open POs with the old tax rate will be changed to the new rate. So. if any of your vendor gives an invoice with reference to an open PO with old tax rate (Invoice raised before tax rate change and received at your place after tax rate change) you will not be able to make the GR due to tax rate difference. So, before changing the tax rate, make sure that there is no old invoice pending to do GR or IR and also there is no material in transit.
If you are creating a new tax code, you can create new POs and receive the material based on that POs. If any material received against the old POs you can post with old tax rates. But, discuss with your FI person of there is any issues regarding statutory requirements with Excise / Tax authorities.

AP invoice with different tax rate and cost center?

Dear all,
We are just upgrade from 11i to R12.1.3. Before in 11i, we can change distribution account in AP invoice distribution line if the type is "Tax". However, after updated to R12, we define tax code (e.g. P1 for particular account combination), so once user selects tax code "P1" and invoice will automatic creates tax line for such invoice but the user cannot change distribution account anymore. Because in 11i, user will change the distribution account (cost center segment) but now in R12 user cannot change it.
The only work around is defining different tax code for different cost center.
For example: P1-0001 => 01.0000.999999.00001
P2-0001 => 01.0000.999999.00002
We have hundred of tax code and cost center combination.
Any other work around for this? or anyone encounter the same problem?
Please advice.
Thanks.

Let me explain more in details:
1) The cost centre will will more. 2 cost centres just a simple example.
For now, we have 5 cost centres for each of the tax rate. For the work around now, I need to define 5 tax codes for the same tax rate for different distribution combinations:
Quote
Tax Code ==>Tax Rate ==> AP Distribution Combination
A1-3500 ==> 10% ==>001.9999999.3500.00
A1-3600 ==> 10%==> 001.9999999.3600.00
A1-3700 ==> 10%==> 001.9999999.3700.00
A1-3800 ==> 10%==> 001.9999999.3800.00
A1-3900 ==> 10%==> 001.9999999.3900.00
2) The driving factor would be 100% percent.
Please kindly advice.
Many thanks.
driving factor for the cost centre

Tax rate from tax code

Dear Gurus ,
I hv created one tax code A0 (using FTXP) and in that i have maintained three condition type JCES ( Service tax ) ,JECE ( Serviece tax edu.) ,JECD ( High edu cess) .
I maintained tax rate for each condition type as 12 %, 2% ,1%
resepectively .
However when i create condition record (VK11) for each condition type , i enter tax code , this automatically determines tax rate 12% for all condition types .
My concern is it has to take 12% , 2% % ,1 % as per condition type rate maintained in tax code .
Pls suggest me any inputs
Thanks in advance .
Anchal Pawar

Dear Anchal,
The condtion type can be created on application like S&D (V) and TAX (Tx).
Here, the condition type u have created is for TAX n u have created A0 tax code in FTXP.
To get the values ie. 12%, @%, & 1% in FTXP you need to create the condition record in FV11, with key combination as TAX CODE i.e., for the particular condition type & taxcode combination u give the percentage.
once u created the condition type in FV11, these values or % will be copied to FTXP condition type.
Hope, this i/p will serve the purpose and if you have arrived at the soln by any other mean please let us know.
With regards,
Vijayashree

CA: Additional Tax infotype 462 and 463

Requirement is to capturing additional tax and taken from employee pay.
I want to know can I delimit the existing IT462 and IT463 and create a new IT462 and 463 for one pay period deduct additional tax (Fed and Provincial) and change the infotype back to original form after deducting addition tax (one time ) from employee pay.
Please let me know is there any implication of this workaround on future tax calculation or year end activities.
Or to divide capturing amount in 12 (Monthly pay period)and deduct from employee pay every month,
Please advise.
Thanks in advance

Hi Karthik,
Yes Few employees are from Quebec and few are from ontario.
I did delimit IT 462 and 463.
I can see additional fed and prvovincial tax in /306 and /356 and additional amount added in /302 and /352.
However instead of deducting from employee payement /559 it goest into claim /561.
And user wants to deduct it from /559. ( Employee has enough money to deduct additional fed and prov tax).
Please let me know what can I do or is it a normal process.
Thanks,

Sales Tax rate in Sales Order

Hi All,
I am writing an application which is suppose to import Sales Orders from other application, I cannot use DTW because I need to do some calculations while importing orders so am using DI to write code.
Ok now comes the real problem, I have Sales Tax rate in my source application and I want to use same percentage in order, but DI does not allows me to specify sales tax rate (%) for the order instead it uses default customer tax code. Is there any way where I can override default tax rate and populate it with the number from source application?
Thanks Gurus
Jiten

Dear Jitendra,
maybe it would be better to post your question to forum <Expert Forums\SAP Business One\SAP Business One SDK>. There you will find experts in programming DI and UI.
The forum <Expert Forums\SAP Business One\SAP Business One> you posted to is rather for questions concerning the use of SAP Business One and not the programming of its interfaces. Of course, it may be possible that someone answers your question here, too. But it is more likely to find answers in the others forum.
Regards,
Frank Romeni

Securities - effective corporate tax rate to OCI balance

Has anyone been able to figure out the effective corporate tax rate application to the OCI balance so that the equity is reported net of tax for the securities module?
If so, how?

Hi,
Could you please be more specific on your question or can you please elaborate more. Are you asking about the tax leived on the security balance or the tax for incoming flows like interest payment or dividend or distribution.
If it is the tax for incoming flow, it can be configured under secuities -- position management -- define tax rates. For every incoming flow, you can generate an outgoing tax flow with the specified percentage.
If it is tax for the security balance, I am not sure what your requirement is. Could you elaorate more on this.
Regards,
Ravi

Tax rate is not coming up in PO

Hi,
The rate is not coming for one of the tax condition type in the PO
1)Tax percentage 12 percent is maintained against the condition type in FV11.
2)Calculation schema is proper.
3) Tax code is maintained properly .
this problem has arised after migrating to ECC6.0.Earlier version was 4.7
the base amount in PO is also zero condition type BASB in the tax calc procedure

Is the material taxable? Check material master
Also check the invoice tab of the PO to verify if tax code is getting populated and what jurisdiction codes. Then check ftxp for tax rates maintained for that combination or not.
Edited by: SB on Sep 17, 2008 10:46 PM

'Genius' related question for anyone with over 1.2TB of music?

Anyone out there with a iTunes library with over 1.2TB of music?
Reason I ask, is that I've not been able to solve a problem in updating Genuis - I'm getting the error - 'Genius results can't be updated right now. There is not enough memory available ~ Please try again later.' or the 'unknown 4002 error'. The steps I've taken to try and correct sometime back can be found in https://discussions.apple.com/message/12584815#12584815 and also shown here in sequence below.
I keep thinking this will be fixed with the next version iTunes but so far with the latest, things still the same. So looking to see if anyone with a similar size library is having similar problems and it just a limitation of the program or it's something specific on my end that I can fix.
Appreciate...
Up to this weekend I've had not issues with Genius. Worked beautifully and updated last Sunday as I have been doing every week since Apple added Genius. Yesterday I added a few albums and went to update and now getting the error of 'Genius results can't be updated right now. There is not enough memory available ~ Please try again later.' Now my library is well over >200,000 songs and only added 6 albums this time. Music sits on a external 2TB drive ~100GB free and my MacBook Pro has over 60GB open. Running latest Mac OSX and latest iTunes. Nothing new installed or changed since last Genius update.
To the points raised in this thread.
1. I've been updated weekly with a Library with over 200K songs till now with no problem. Majority is what I've ripped from my albums & CDs.
2. Deleted the albums recently added since last successful update - same result.
3. Connected directly to the network bypassing router as suggested here - same result.
4. Reinstalled iTunes program - same result.
5. Repaired permissions - same result.
Problem remains. Welcome any additional thoughts.
Question for anyone with a music library
https://discussions.apple.com/message/12584815#12584815
Ok, tried all the suggestions here yet the problem remains.
In addition what I posted above -
1) Dumped the cookies in user/library/cookies folder
2) Deleted the apple cookies found under Safari Preferences "Show Cookies"
3) Repaired disk permissions
4) Deleted iTunes Library Genius.itdb file
5) Reinstalled iTunes (with the new 10.1 version)
6) Restarted computer
7) Rebuilt iTunes Library folder http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1451
8) Deleted all iTunes dead tracks
http://dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/ss.php?sp=removedeadsuper
9) Increased internet access speed
10) Removed all open "[" and '}' brackets from songs, albums & artists
10) Rebuilt my entire library from scratch!
Is there anyone out there with over 200K songs that can update their Genius? One thing I noted is the genuis.itdb file is just over 2GB. I'm wondering if there is a maximum size on this based on the error I'm getting. Any thought or know info on this?
Ok, think I may have found something here with this. I backed out all the music added prior to this problem occurring and ran the Genius update. All worked fine. I then started adding the music back little by little (running the update each time) until the problem returned. When the problem came back I ruled out the specific music added by backing that bit out, verified all was ok and added a different batch back in.
Bottom-line it appears that when my library exceeds exactly 1.208TB the problem appears. Interestingly enough it does not appear to be related to the number of songs, the size of the genius.itdb file (in fact when it was working the file was at 2.25GB - larger than what I reported before). It specifically seems to be related to the size of the overall library - when I have it for example at 1.2079 all is ok, 1.2081 it fails with this error.
I did try moving the library and related files to the external drive but same result. abavetta, I think your suggestion of this script may be a workaround for now - although from what I read, is this not the same that you can do anyway with iTunes by holding the alt/option key open start up? In fact I do have two libraries now - one with the 2TB drive which I use at home and another for 2x500GB disks I carry with me when i travel. I just reported the same back to Apple but doubt if any immediate solution will come for this. Too bad as one of the great things about having such a large library is the mixes you can generate via Genius. Anyway, such is life and will just live with this for now. I also just found this program called Tangerine! http://www.potionfactory.com/tangerine/ which creates playlists like Genius - although through a different technique I might also take a look at.

Just to let all know that may be having a similar problem, what I found by accident to fix this problem.
Reset all my Home Folder permissions using the resetpassword method from the startup utility in Lion. Then turned off/on to reset Genius and cleaned out the cache folder for good measure. Finally after more than a year without, have Genius up and running again.

Tax Rate re-determination in purchase Order

Hi,
I have maintain the Tax rate through Transaction FV11 with key combination Plan/ Vendor/ Material Group/ Tax code.
Below Tax rate Structure :
Country
Plant
Vendor
Material Group
Tax Code
Tax Rate
Valid From
Valid To
IN
C006
11691
201
L7
12.36
01.04.2015
20.04.2015
IN
C006
11691
201
L7
14.00
21.04.2015
31.12.9999
I am creating the PO on dated 01st April 2015.When i am change in current pricing date in Pricing Control Tab , Tax rate can not be re determine in purchase order.
please check the screen shot

Hello Sachin,
Tax rate determination in PO is based on the PO document date and not on the price date.
You can test this, during PO creation, first you keep PO document date as '07.04.2015', system will show tax percentage as 12.36. Now, you change the PO document date to '22.04.2015', system will show tax percentage as 14.

How to see tax rate in KONV table

hi all,
how to see tax rates in KONV table?
please help

Hi
There is a field called "TX" i.e. TAX CODE.. in that check what code is that?? then check the TAX table T007A to find the Tax rate applied for the document based on the respective TAX CODE.
Hope this helps.

Different 'MWST' Tax rate for company codes with same country

Hi Experts,
I am not an SD expert, but need some inputs on a requirement. We have the manual condition type 'MWST' for tax conditions and the 'MWST' rate is set for different countries.
We have Sales Organization 'A' and 'B' which are for the same country (JP) and the requirement is to have tax as 7% for Sales org 'A' and no tax (0%) for 'B' in billing for the same billing material . But when we set the tax classification in material master, for Sales Org 'B' and the billing material, the system automatically changes the classification for 'A' also to 0% since the tax classification is based on country and not sales organization. Here both the Sales org is for the same country 'JP'.
Is there any other way or configuration through which we can achieve this requirement ?
Your thoughts are much appreciated.
Thanks,
Dhan

Well mate, Vemuri provide an alternative from FI point of view. From SD standing I'd suggest to work out the condition technique as this condition type (MWST) has an access sequence MWST (the same code) and it has 3 tables related:
78 - Departure Country / Destination Country
2 - Domestic Taxes
11 - Export Taxes
What I can see is that you need to include the value Sales Organization in one of the tables.
NOW, IF YOU DONT WANNA MESS WITH THE CONFIG...
The customer has Tax indicators in its Sales Area Data, why don't you just set the value there to determine always 0% tax for the Sales Org you want?
Look forward for your remarks.
Saludos!
Ricardo

Medicare additional tax rate (.9%) for employees with wages over 200K

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for