Memory limitation on 32-bit Server 2000 pltfrm

Looking for the definitive explanation of why/what is limiting the ability to allocate more than 1/2 of the available system memory to Oracle SGA & PGA. Specifically: 4GB total system RAM on a MS Server 2000 32-bit system platform. Unable to appropriate/allocate more than 1/2 (2GB) of memory to Oracle 9.2.0.4 processes - SGA & PGA. I've read some discussion that Windows appropriates certain amounts - perhaps half - of all available RAM on 32-bit systems. e.g. 2GB total RAM results in 1GB to Server 2000 system processes and 1GB available to Oracle. Is this thinking on the right track.
Need Oracle to utilze more memory. Can anyone offer or point to an explanation of this limitation..... a work around
Thanks,
-- rl

Following an excerpt of Note 225349.1 in MetaLink
"Implementing Address Windowing Extensions (AWE) or VLM on Windows Platforms"
AWE Memory implementation on Windows 2000
A common question on the Windows NT/Windows 2000 platform revolves around
how to take advantage of systems with more than 4 GB of RAM. As discussed
in Metalink NOTE:46001.1 and NOTE:46053.1, the 32-Bit process address
space for any process on Windows equates to a total of 4GB of addressable
RAM. Of this, by default, 2GB is reserved for the process itself, and 2GB
for the kernel. On systems running either Windows 2000 Advanced Server,
or Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition, this ratio can be changed by adding
the /3GB switch to the boot.ini, allowing a process to address 3GB and
reserving 1GB for the kernel. However, the total addressable memory for
a single process is still only 4GB.
See also Note:1036312.6 : Utilizing Up to 3GB Virtual Memory on Windows NT Server 4.0

Similar Messages

Connect Oracle 11g (64-bit windows server) to Microsoft SQL Server 2000

Hi all,
I am trying to connect:
Oracle 11g (64-bit windows server) to Microsoft SQL Server 2000 (32-bit) on a different machine.
1) I have create an ODBC connection (called:GALAXY) which connects.
2) created a init.ora called it initgalaxy.ora in $oracle_home\hs\admin
HS_FDS_CONNECT_INFO = GALAXY
HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL = on
3) modified the listener.ora file as below
# listener.ora Network Configuration File: E:\Ora11g\product\11.1.0\db_1\network\admin\listener.ora
# Generated by Oracle configuration tools.
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = BIU01)(PORT = 1521))
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = extproc0))
SID_LIST_LISTENER=
(SID_LIST=
(SID_DESC =
(GLOBAL_DBNAME = HEX.BIU01.kingsch.nhs.uk)
(ORACLE_HOME = E:\Ora11g\product\11.1.0\db_1)
(SID_NAME = HEX)
(SID_DESC=
(SID_NAME = galaxy)
(ORACLE_HOME = E:\Ora11g\product\11.1.0\db_1)
(PROGRAM = dg4odbc)
(SID_DESC =
(PROGRAM = EXTPROC)
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = E:\Ora11g\product\11.1.0\db_1)
4) modified the tnsnames.ora file is as follows
GALAXY =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = BIU01.kingsch.nhs.uk)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = galaxy)
(HS = OK)
HEX =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = BIU01.kingsch.nhs.uk)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = HEX)
5) restarted the listener
6) created a public database connect
create PUBLIC DATABASE LINK "GALAXY" CONNECT TO "USER" IDENTIFIED by "PWD" USING 'galaxy';
This is the error message I can sell in $oracle_home\hs\admin\trace
Oracle Corporation --- MONDAY APR 27 2009 11:54:18.370
Heterogeneous Agent Release
11.1.0.6.0
Oracle Corporation --- MONDAY APR 27 2009 11:54:18.370
Version 11.1.0.6.0
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL" returned "ON"
HOSGIP for "HS_OPEN_CURSORS" returned "50"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_FETCH_ROWS" returned "100"
HOSGIP for "HS_LONG_PIECE_TRANSFER_SIZE" returned "65536"
HOSGIP for "HS_NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTER" returned ".,"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_RECOVERY_ACCOUNT" returned "RECOVER"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TRANSACTION_LOG" returned ""HS_TRANSACTION_LOG""
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_TIMESTAMP_AS_DATE" returned "TRUE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_CHARACTER_SEMANTICS" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_MAP_NCHAR" returned "TRUE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_RESULT_SET_SUPPORT" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_PROC_IS_FUNC" returned "FALSE"
HOSGIP for "HS_FDS_REPORT_REAL_AS_DOUBLE" returned "FALSE"
using galaxy_live as default value for "HS_FDS_DEFAULT_OWNER"
HOSGIP for "HS_SQL_HANDLE_STMT_REUSE" returned "FALSE"
##>Connect Parameters (len=42)<##
## DSN=GALAXY;
#! UID=galaxy_live;
#! PWD=*
hgocont, line 1890: calling SqlDriverConnect got sqlstate IM002
when I try to test the database link, I get this error:
ORA-28500: connection from ORACLE to a non-Oracle system returned this message:
[Microsoft][ODBC Drive Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specified
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from GALAXY
28500.00000- "connection from ORACLE to ad non-Oracle system returned this message:"
*Cause: The cause is explained in the forwarded message.
*Action: See the non-Oracle system's documentation of the forwarded message.
vendor code 28500
Edited by: user7336435 on 27-Apr-2009 05:56

11.2 is beta at the moment. There is no official release date so far.
As DG4ODBC is independant from the Oracle database (or the target database) you can use a 3 machine model:
On the first machine you have your Oracle database, on a second machine running 32bit Windows you can install DG4ODBC and on the 3rd machine you can run your foreign database.
If the SQL Server 2k is installed on a 32bit Windows machine, then you can also install DG4ODBC on this machine.
In general the connection from an Oracle database to the DG4ODBC machine is done using SDQL*Net. The listener responsible for DG4ODBC will then load the DG4ODBC executable which will connect to the SQL Server using SQL Server ODBC driver.

SQL Server 2000 64-bit: x64-bit edition vs IA64 Itanium processor ?

Hi Forum,
I do need SQL Server 2000 64-bit. So, I have used our premium MSDN subscription, and I have downloaded:
SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition - 64-bit (English)
SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition - 64-bit (English)
However, Our DBA specialist informed me that both packages are for the IA64 Itanium processor, and what we really need is for the
x64-bit edition.
Could you please help me out ?

Hello,
To my knowledge 64-bit version of SQL Server runs on Itanium and Tandem only. You have to install SQL Server 2000 32-bit on a 64-bit
Windows operating system.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Intermittent error establishing socket on SQL Server 2000

I have a suite of 130 JUnit tests. Recently, they started to give me intermittent "error establishing socket" errors when trying to connect to a local instance of SQL Server 2000 via JDBC.
Each test creates one or more connections. I've used wrappers to prove that I'm closing all of the connections, statements, prepared statements and result sets. The first 70 or 80 tests succeed. After that every test gets the "error establishing socket" exception. Sometimes (but not always) SQL Server continues to refuse connections when I re-run the suite. When that happens I have to let it sit for 30 seconds or so (or restart the server) before it will accept connections.
I've tested this with both Microsoft's and WebLogic's JDBC drivers with the same results. There's nothing in the SQL Server logs when this happens. There's nothing in the Windows event logs, either.
If I sleep for 5 seconds between each test the problem goes away.
I installed the latest service pack (SP3a) for SQL Server 2000 with no change in behavior.
All of this leads me to believe that something is wrong with SQL Server. Has anyone else run into this problem? Any ideas?

I am not overly familiar with the SQL Server network architecture, but there are scenarios that could explain your intermittent failures.
When you connect to a database one of two things can happen, you can start your own process on the server that acts as communication to from the server locally, or you are put in a queue for a static (shared) process that does the same thing.
Assuming that most databases are initially setup with singular processes per connection, and you have established a connection then you disconnect from the database you do not automatically or instantly kill your process running on the server. There are two primary reasons for this as far as I know. First, the database puts more priority on doing something then doing nothing. Cleaning up and removing your process would be considered doing nothing, accepting incoming connections would be considered doing something. Second, the process may have to stay around to ensure all commit or rollback is completed properly (not always true in every database).
So, I would expect that there is a connection limit (perhaps between 50-80) that you are exceeding because you are firing these connections rapidly and even though you close the connection in your remote program, the database simply doesn't keep up. Most databases will "cleanup" reasonably quickly if they have the resources to do so, so if you were to put a 30 second delay between every connection it would probably work just fine. It would probably work fine if you put a 30 second delay between after every 20 connections too. It's a bit of balancing act.
There would be a couple of ways to alleviate this constraint. Putting in delays can demonstrate that this is in fact a work load problem (constrained by total count of connections), but doesn't really help in production instances. You can change the maximum number of connections allowed by the database, however this threshold may be caused by hardware resource (memory) limitations as much as it is a parameter in the database. You may have to add memory to accommodate this many connections. You may have to constrain how much memory each connection gets (again controlled by database parameters). You may have to accept this as a resource constraint and write your code accordingly. This often manifests itself by taking advantage of transaction managers (or transaction manager logic) that will queue up requests until database resources are available.
Again, I'm not a SQL Server expert, but I'm reasonably certain that most of what I said applies if not specifically at least generally.
Good Luck.

Standard Edition Memory Limitations

What is the upper memory limitation for the SGA size when using Standard Edition 9.x on Windows 2000?
What about Enterprise?

According what I know the SGA in one OS is limited by the OS and the parameter SGA_MAX_SIZE. I have never heard that SGA has limitations related to the license.
SGA_MAX_SIZE
Parameter type
Big integer
Syntax
SGA_MAX_SIZE = integer [K | M | G]
Default value
Initial size of SGA at startup, dependent on the sizes of different pools in the SGA, such as buffer cache, shared pool, large pool, and so on.
Parameter class
Static
Range of values
0 to operating system-dependent
SGA_MAX_SIZE specifies the maximum size of SGA for the lifetime of the instance.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96536/ch1190.htm#REFRN10198
Joel P�rez

JSP w/ SQL Server 2000

Hi,
I have experience with J2SE but not so much J2EE, including JSP, so I would like some input from those who are better equipped to solve this problem. My employer purchased an SQL Server 2000 and asked me to build a solution to access the database. Instantly, the .NET platform comes to mind, but the company has invested quite a bit of money to build a J2EE infrastructure (which I don't exactly know what it means). I would like to know, first if it is possible to build a JSP/J2EE solution, and if so, what the advantages and disadvantages of building a JSP/J2EE solution. If I'm using any terms incorrectly, feel free to correct me, and I would appreciate any input.
Thanks in advance!

There really isn't a problem accessing MS/SQL from Java. Microsoft even provides a reasonable driver to allow you to run the Java on any platform and talk to the SQL server.
I'm guessing that asking a J2EE vs. .net opinion in a Java forum will show bias and my answer should be taken in that light.
One of the first things to understand is that there are levels of J2EE. The entire J2EE spec is gigantic. JSP's and Servlets are a fairly small part of that. With an application server such as Tomcat you can take advantage of some pretty powerful concepts like JSP's and Servlets without diving into some of the more complicated parts.
The disadvantage to that is that you will need to plug some other object to relational mapping to talk to your database. For a small database this is pretty easy. When you get to have a large DB it can be a pain.
Based on the way you've asked this I presume that you are in a Microsoft only shop. It may be that a .net solution would work. But if there is already some amount of J2EE based code it seems like it would be easier to continue down that path. From my perspective the huge advantage is that you're not limited to one platform. You're welcome to use MSFT O/S's but you don't have to.
It sound like a disadvantage is your personal background. You sound tentative about it and are maybe more comfortable in the MSFT world. Java works very well under recent Microsoft O/S's and I feel that the quality of the development environments (IDE's) are pretty much up to par with Microsoft's. This may fall down a little when it comes to HTML builders but it is pretty close.
Good luck!

Memory limitation on T61

I have the following Lenovo notebook :
Product: ThinkPad T61 8898-55G [change]
Operating system: All [change]
Original description: T7100(1.8GHz), 1GB RAM, 120GB 5400rpm HD, 14.1in 1024x768 LCD, Intel X3100, CDRW/DVDRW, Intel 802.11abg wireless, Bluetooth, Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Secure chip, Fingerprint reader, 4c Li-Ion, WinVista Business 32
I configured my Notebook with a Dual-boot Windowx XP Pro SP3 and Windows Vista Bussines SP1 (32 bit)
I have 2x 512 MB PC2-5300 667 MHz DDR2 memory inside.
I read on the Lenovo site :
Memory Compatibility
(**) Windows Vista supports up to 4GB maximum memory (32-bit versions of Windows Vista cannot support 4GB). Windows XP supports up to 3GB maximum memory
I like to update my memory with
2x 40Y7734 1 GB PC2-5300 667 MHz DDR2
or
2x 40Y7735 2 GB PC2-5300 667 MHz DDR2
I like to know if I choose for 2x 2GB , will :
Windows XP SP3 work just fine only it works with 3GB instead of 4GB installed memory
Window Vista SP1 (32-bit) with the 4GB (even not supported) work stable ?
Because the prices of 1 GB and 2 GB won't change much nowadays.
I prefer to use 2x 2GB modules, but I like to know will it work (even with the memory limitation) stable on XP or on Vista
or it is better/safer to use 2x 1GB modules
Can anybody help/explain me or advice me ?
Electronic
Message Edited by electronic on 01-16-2009 09:51 PM

You're better off with 2x2GB, you may decide to run a 64-bit OS someday...and you will notice a difference between 2GB and 3GB when running a 32-bit OS.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

Memory limitation for session object!

what is the memory limitation for using session objects?
venu

as already mentioned there is no actual memory limitation within the specification, it only depends on the jvm's settings
how different app-server handle memory management of session objects is another part of the puzzle, but in general you should not have problems in writting any object to the session.
we had the requirement once to keep big objects in session, we decided to do a ResourceFactory that returns us the objects, and only store unique-Ids into the session.
We could lateron build on this and perform special serialization tasks of big objects in the distributed environment.
Dietmar

Running SAP Business One on a 64-bit server

One of our clients wants to upgrade their server to a 64-bit server running Windows Server 2008.
What are the implications of this and do we also need to then use Microsoft SQL Server 2008?
I went to this web link: https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/smb/sbo/platforms and found some info, but the questions I still have is the following:
1. If we upgrade to SQL 2008, do we have to buy licenses or can we also just get an installation from SAP with our software (if we've gone live over 2 years ago already on SQL 2000, then upgraded to SQL 2005).
2. Can we still stay on SQL 2005 or is it better to use SQL 2008 and what is the implications?
I found the following on the link posted above:
Mar 11: SAP Business One 2007 now supports Microsoft® SQL Server 2008.
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 is now fully supported by SAP Business One 2007 A (as of patch 47) and SAP Business One 2007 B (as of patch 10), including SAP-developed add-ons.
Jan 21: SAP Business One 2007 now supports Microsoft® Windows Server 2008.
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 is now fully supported by SAP Business One 2007 A (as of patch 46) and SAP Business One 2007 B (as of patch 09), including SAP-developed add-ons. 64-bit and WTS support are still pending and will be announced when available.
What exactly does the bold part mean?
Any tips/hints on making this decision will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Adele

Hi Adele,
"64-bit and WTS support are still pending and will be announced when available" means that Windows 2008 64bit has not been tested working with SAP Business One yet. Thus not supported (yet).
Same applies to W indows T erminal S erver 32bit and 64bit.
>
Adele le Roux wrote:
> 1. If we upgrade to SQL 2008, do we have to buy licenses or can we also just get an installation from SAP with our software (if we've gone live over 2 years ago already on SQL 2000, then upgraded to SQL 2005
I am not sure if procedure as described in note [928839|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZ3PTU4ODAwMDAr)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E&note_numm=928839] will apply. In order to get excact clarification I have asked the owner of the note to update it reagarding MSSQL 2008 licenses.
>
Adele le Roux wrote:
> 2. Can we still stay on SQL 2005 or is it better to use SQL 2008 and what is the implications?.
Yes, you can still stay on MSSQL 2005 and upgrade later to MSSQL 2008. The other way around will not work. MSSQL 2008 is currently supported only as of SAP Business One 2007 A PL47 or SAP Business One 2007 B PL10. Refer to [http://service.sap.com/smb/sbo/platforms|http://service.sap.com/smb/sbo/platforms].
Regards
Mario

Installing ArcSDE on a 32-bit server to connect to a Oracle DB on Itanium

I am looking for a resolution to have ArcSDE installed to work on a HP Intanium Server with Oracle 9i.
The present option is can I install ArcSDE on a 32-bit server and use the Net8 /Oracle Client connection to access the Oracle 9i Database on a seperate server that is running Itanium 64-bit.
Is this supported method

I'm not sure if it is fully supported, but is "should" work. I have used the 32-bit ArcSDE on a Win2000 server (also client win 2000 boxes with direct connect) to access a Solaris 9-64 Oracle 9iR2 server.
Bryan

Workarounds for searching a text field in SQL Server 2000

Hi,
I have a need to search within a text field in SQL Server 2000. In the
limitations section it notes that this is not possible. Is there a
recommended workaround for this in terms of performance? I have no way
of knowing the length of the text field in advance, and this could be
fairly large. Also, the number of objects that could contain the text
can be fairly large as well.
Thanks in advance,
Khamsouk

Note that some databases (or Oracle, at least) provide alternatives to
LIKE '%foo%' that are more efficient for large text blocks, given that
you have the appropriate indexing plugins etc. etc.
To use one of those types of search operators, you'd have to put
together a custom extension.
-Fred
Fred Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm assuming that when you say 'a text field', you're referring to a
SQLServer TEXT field, as opposed to just any old field that contains
text.
Like I said, I'm by no means a SQLServer pro, but I just ran:
SELECT CLOBSTRINGX
FROM LOCATORTESTOBJECTX
WHERE CLOBSTRINGX LIKE '%o%';
and got back my test row with 'foo' in the CLOBSTRINGX column.
CLOBSTRINGX is a TEXT column.
So, it is possible that our stringContains() extension will just work.
But then again, maybe not. I'm guessing it will.
Give it a try and, if you get an error, post the generated SQL (turn on
SQL output by setting the com.solarmetric.kodo.Logger property to
'stdout') and the error that you get. Also, try executing the generated
SQL directly against your data store to see if it works there.
-Fred
Khamsouk Souvanlasy <[email protected]> wrote:
Basically I just want to use kodo's extended stringContains syntax on a
text field. Is this possible?
Khamsouk
Fred Lucas wrote:
I'm not intimitely familiar with SQLServer's text searching
capabilities, but I'm confident that you could create a query extension
that would do what you need it to do.
What is the SQL that you are trying to generate?
-Fred
Khamsouk Souvanlasy <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a need to search within a text field in SQL Server 2000. In the
limitations section it notes that this is not possible. Is there a
recommended workaround for this in terms of performance? I have no way
of knowing the length of the text field in advance, and this could be
fairly large. Also, the number of objects that could contain the text
can be fairly large as well.
Thanks in advance,
Khamsouk
Fred Lucas
SolarMetric Inc.
202-595-2064 x1122
http://www.solarmetric.com

Logical XOR operator in T-SQL (SQL Server 2000)

Hi all....
I was wondering why SQL Server 2000 lacks a logical XOR operator. Do you have a ready to use function that implements it?
How can I program one by myself? I know that A XOR B is equivalent to NOT A * B + A * NOT B. So I tried to create this function :
CREATE FUNCTION XOR
-- Add the parameters for the function here
@A BIT,
@B BIT
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN
RETURN NOT @A AND @B OR @A + NOT @B
END
But it didn't compile.
How can I pass boolean values as parameters? any other hint?
Thanks
Jaime

I have these two views , one of them hard coded as NULL as it always needs to be NULL. I wanted to union them
Now the problem is I have to replace those NULLS if I have a value from other VIEW or else NULL ( no change)
I am getting duplicates of rows with values and NULLS , whereas I needed only records with values
I need records with values and records without value as NULL . please let me know how to eliminate dups with NULLS
21
ARGH
Bus
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
21
ARGH
Bus
66
781
HEAVY
00:00.0
21
F1WS
Ship
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
21
HGDD
car
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
21
HGDT
car
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
Below is the code :
--- view having values
SELECT *
FROM Table1 AS S INNER JOIN
Table2 AS P ON S.columnA = P.columnB
WHERE EXISTS
(SELECT 1 AS A
FROM Table2 AS R
WHERE (S.columnA = columnB))
GROUP BY ALL
UNION
--- views harded coded as NULLS
SELECT *, NULL AS APR , NULL AS MAY , NULL AS JUN , NULL AS JUL , NULL AS AUG
FROM Table1 AS S INNER JOIN
Table2 AS P ON S.columnA <> P.columnB
WHERE (NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1 AS A
FROM Table2 AS R
WHERE (S.columnA = columnB) )) OR
EXISTS
(SELECT 1 AS A
FROM Table2 AS R
WHERE (S.columnA = columnB) )
GROUP BY ALL

DV6500 Physical Memory Limitation to 3gb

Hi All,
My DV6500 Entertainment PC came with Windows Vista 32-bit preinstalled which limited my usable memory from 4gb to 3gb. I recently upgraded to Windows Home Premium 32-bit which I believe has a physical memory limitation of 4gb (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx#physical_memory_l... but upon inspection my windows still shows 3gb usable memory. Is there something I need to tweek in windows or bios to fully use all 4gb as installed on my laptop? Thanks in advance.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi:
That's what this forum is for...asking and answering questions.
So there is absolutely nothing for you to be sorry for.
Unfortunately, there is no way you can re-map or re-dedicate the memory configuration. It is what it is.
However, your PC's BIOS may have a setting to allow for more dedicated graphics memory to be used.
I was very surprised to see that in my dv6810us BIOS, there is a video memory setting. The default is 64 MB. However, I could change the setting to 128 MB or 32 MB.
So, I changed it to 128 MB.
Paul

Memory limitation to load a Jpeg

Hi all,
I want to use the loader component to load an image within my
Flash lite movie, when I try to do it with a Jpeg (612pix X 792 pix
/ 96dpi X 96dpi), the device emulator says me in runtime:
Problem with content: 11 - Not enough memory available to
decompress
if I do the same with another Jpeg (533pix X 526 pix / 96dpi
X 96dpi) there is no problem.
My question is: what are the memory limitations to load and
to display an Image (Jpeg or bitmap)?

Hi Thamis,
Take a look at the flash.net.FileReference class here:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/2/langref/index.html
This is the built in Flash support for file upload. You'd
handle the upload with a servlet/jsp/etc. server-side component to
save it to disk or as binary data in a database.
Best,
Seth

SQL Server 2000 and 2008 Standard Edition

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any auditing limitations in the standard editions of SQL server 2000 and 2008 R2.
I'm interested to know if there are audit functions for user auditing like creation, deletion and logons
Can't seem to find any information about this.

In addition to Shanky notes, please have a look at these article:
DML Trigger Status Alerts
Implementing generic audit trail trigger in sql server
Saeid Hasani [sqldevelop]

Memory limitation on 32-bit Server 2000 pltfrm

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for