Message Mapping delete Field

Hello,
i want to delete a field in the target structure.
Like you do it with disable.
for example
when in the source field the value is empty i want to disable the target field.
But when there is a value, i want to map this value into target field.
how i have to handle that?
regards,
robin

Hi,
Use Create If in mapping. i have documented for my requirement. and apply the same logic in your case also.
If the field CHARG is dont have any value in the source means , we shouldnt produce the Target Element . Then we used the Create If logic. If the Field have the value from the source means we have to produce it at target side , otherwise we have to collapse it.
See this Screenshot
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/8830/createifjo4.jpg
Regards
Seshagiri

Similar Messages

Message Mapping, filling field with 0 (zeros) on left

I need to fill a field with values that has variable lenght adding 0 (zeros) on the left, how can I do it ?
I'm using the LENGHT in message mapping, with value returned by LENGHT I use FIXVALUES to map the quantity of 0 (zeros) that I need to add in the field.
Somebody can help me with this problem ?
Thank's.

Hi Regis,
You can use the Arithmetic:FormatNum built-in function for this.
If you want to left-pad the number with zeros so that the length is always 10, then specify 10 zeros for the format, 0000000000.
This function takes formats based on java.text.DecimalFormat so you can see all of the possibilities at:
java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/text/DecimalFormat.html
Thanks,
Jesse

Filtering records in message mapping by field value

hi,
i have a source message:
record: 1..1
--row: 0..unbounded
type: 1..1
data: 1..1
i want to map to target message with the same structure only rows with type = x.
how do i do that in message mapping?
thanks
Tomer

if u mean that the target message shud be generated only when type = x use the below mapping.
type------------->
equalsS----->createif--->row(tgt root)
Constant[x]--->
Map
type--->type
data--->data

Message Mapping : Set Field Name at Runtime

Hi All,
Source structure of my message is :
<recordset>
<Query></Query>----
0 to unbounded
</recordset>
Target Structure :
<SQL>
<key></key>----
0 to unbounded
</SQL>
Now my requirement is such that....if the source message has 3 Query elements then XI should generate key node in target message 3 times but with names key1,key2,key3.
I am not able to set the names of these target nodes at runtime based on the number of query elements in source message.
Can anybody please help me?

HI,,
YOu can not change the names of your "Fields".
Hi,
If you want to change Value you can do that by writing UDF.
Enter this code in UDF.
for(int i=0;i<a.length();i++)
result.addValue("");
Regards,
Akshay Jamgoankar.
Reward points if find useful.>

Count-Function in Message Mapping

Hey, trying to map following structures:
message
-m1
--m11
-m2
--m22
-m3
--m33
to
message
-m1
--m11
-m2
--m22
-m3
--m33
-f1
--countItems
The nodes m1,m2 and m3 can appear 1..unbounded. In target structure I would
like to have the numbers of all nodes (m1,m2,m3).
For example: In this source structure m1,m2,m3 appear only one time. In the
field countItems I would like to have the number 3.
I tried the count function, but it could only count the structure where I used it (in
this case: f1).
How can I count the above-mentioned nodes?
thanks
chris

Hey,
thanks for your answers.
But I still couldn't understand how to do this. I open the message mapping for field f1, but the count function could only be set on an target-element, so where to set the counters for m1,m2,m3? Do I have to insert extra fields under m1..m3?
If I do the counter would increment with every node, so if I have two times m1, in second tree of m1 a two will be insert. If I use the add function, only for these two tree the result would be three!
@Gangisetty Vijaya Bhaskarudu
Is this just one UDF? From where he knows, which nodes he have to count, if I have more than m1..m3, but only want to count this three?
@ sasitharan
same problem as mentioned above:
this doesn't work:
m1--count---\
I can't use m1 as input for count! Or do I have a wrong count function?
<b>....au damm, answered my own question. Of course. I use COUNTER and you use
COUNT!!!!!!!!!!!! I will try this with COUNT!!</b>
thanks
chris

File to IDOC Senario (Message Mapping)

Hi Experts,
I am a fresher.
This is " File to IDOC Senario ".
I have Doubt on this: ( In Message Mapping)
Source field : MSG
Length : 1/264
Taget field : E1EDKT2 - TDLINE
Legth : CHAR/70
Mapping Condition :
Note: TDFORMAT = ‘=’ (Long Line), until next line of MSG. When new line occurs in MSG, then use TDFORMAT = ‘/’
How to Make the Mapping for this?
Anyone Can help me to get it Quickly.
give your Suggestions and Show some Example Mappings......

Hi ,
Below is the generic sol for your problem .Graphical mappings wont workout for your problem while using sub string .
Input -->Input string
Length -->length of TDLINE
MESSAGE_V1,V2,V3,V4....depends on how many TDLINES you expect .Here I have taken 4 .
public void SplitbyLength(String[] Input, String[] Length, ResultList MESSAGE_V1, ResultList MESSAGE_V2, ResultList MESSAGE_V3, ResultList MESSAGE_V4, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
int lengthVal = Integer.parseInt(Length[0]);
int InpLenVal ;
for(int i=0;i<Input.length;i++)
InpLenVal =Input[i].length() ;
if (InpLenVal<=lengthVal)
MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0));
MESSAGE_V2.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
MESSAGE_V3.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
else if ((InpLenVal>lengthVal) && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*2)))
MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,InpLenVal));
MESSAGE_V3.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
else if ((InpLenVal>(lengthVal*2)) && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*3)))
MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),InpLenVal));
MESSAGE_V4.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
else if (Input[i].length()>(lengthVal*3) && (InpLenVal <= (lengthVal*4)))
MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),(lengthVal*3)));
MESSAGE_V4.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*3),InpLenVal));
else if (Input[i].length()>(lengthVal*4) )
MESSAGE_V1.addValue(Input[i].substring(0,lengthVal));
MESSAGE_V2.addValue(Input[i].substring(lengthVal,(lengthVal*2)));
MESSAGE_V3.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*2),(lengthVal*3)));
MESSAGE_V4.addValue(Input[i].substring((lengthVal*3),(lengthVal*4)));
Regards
Venkat

I copied message to SMS field and sent. After that the message still exist all the time in the SMS field. When I open the application I must always first delete the "saved" ones before I write the new one. What to do to finally/definitely delete the save

I copied message to SMS field and sent. After that the message still exist all the time in the SMS field. When I open the application I must always first delete the “saved” ones before I write the new one. What to do to finally/definitely delete the save message?

sorry it's ios6

Doubt in fields - message mapping (file 2 idoc scenario)

while doing message mapping in file 2 idoc scenario, i could not able find the values for some field names
( i am following this wiki help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC& )
cremas04 idoc
vendorNo LIFNR
vendor name Name1
Pur_org ? ( I could not able locate field with the similar desc in idoc MT side)
Company code ?
Acc_Grp ?
Search term MCOD1
Address ADRNR
City ORT01
Pin_code PSLTZ
could you help me out with this?
Message was edited by: praba
praba

hi,
I got the answer.

Attachments deleted during message mapping in PI 7.1

We have upgraded our SAP XI 3.0 SP 22 system to SAP PI 7.1 SP06. In XI 3.0 we created some message mappings that mapped an XML payload with attachments to another message type. The attachments would still exist after the mapping step. In SAP PI 7.1 we now see that attachements are deleted from the message. We cannot see why this is happening. We have tried to set the 3 new option in the operation mappings without any results. The attachements are still being deleted.
Active Options in operation mappings:
    Use SAPXMLToolkit = true
    Do Not Resolve XOP includes = false
    Read Attachements = false
In the SXMB_MONI we can see that the attachements are deleted after the Request Message Mapping step. It is a simple proxy-to-proxy scenario with interface and message mapping.
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping 46842937562139BCA3F2AC1F36E729FE</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping 5D945F00B00611DDB04FF8CF0A5B0156</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO im_mail_to_dms</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping Steps 1 JAVA com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM Attachments are Transferred to the Payload</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Mode 0</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerLibsList.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerLibsList</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerParamsList.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerParamsList</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** START APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Document start</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns1:OpvoerenDocumentRequest]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns1="urn:kadaster-nl:SERVICES:DMS:Opvoeren:ZI_KAD_DMS_MAIN"]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [DocumentInfoRecord]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [Type]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Put value [302]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [Type]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [Omschrijving]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Put value [Apeldoorn]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [Omschrijving]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [DocumentInfoRecord]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns1:OpvoerenDocumentRequest]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Document end</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_).</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Attached will be Deleted cid:payload-001708D1A20E1DEDAD96471B4CCBC447(@)sap.com</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Attached will be Deleted cid:payload-001708D1A20E1DEDAD96471B4C758447(@)sap.com</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ContentType application/xml</Trace>
Regards,
Jeroen

Hi Michal,
Already tried this option too. However this option would only transfer the attachments to
the mapping runtime in JAVA. We only map the actual payload in a graphical message
mapping, so for our purpose, the other attachments could stay untouched and remain
in the abap part for further pipeline processing.
You can find the result of the Read attachment option during runtime here:

- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping 46842937562139BCA3F2AC1F36E729FE</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping 5D945F00B00611DDB04FF8CF0A5B0156</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO im_mail_to_dms</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping Steps 1 JAVA com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM Attachments are Transferred to the Payload</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Mode 0</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerLibsList.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerLibsList</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerParamsList.class (urn:kadaster-nl:SERV:ZA:KAD:DOVO, -1) in swcv 5d945f00-b006-11dd-b04f-f8cf0a5b0156.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_$MT$InnerParamsList</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** START APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Document start</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns1:OpvoerenDocumentRequest]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns1="urn:kadaster-nl:SERVICES:DMS:Opvoeren:ZI_KAD_DMS_MAIN"]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [DocumentInfoRecord]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [Type]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Put value [302]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [Type]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [Omschrijving]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Put value [Apeldoorn]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [Omschrijving]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [DocumentInfoRecord]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns1:OpvoerenDocumentRequest]</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Document end</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_mail_to_dms_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._mm_mail_to_dms_).</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Attached will be Deleted cid:payload-001708D1A20E1DDDAD97A993DAB6CB91(@)sap.com</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Attached will be Deleted cid:payload-001708D1A20E1DDDAD97A993DB0E4B91(@)sap.com</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ContentType application/xml</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
Thanks

Message Mapping - SUM a field per unique combination of 2 other fields?

I'm receiving a proxy with detail records, and I need to create a subtotals file. Here an example:
BEFORE MAPPING
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.51</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>0.49</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.72</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>0.82</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.18</FTE>
   </ROW>
AFTER MAPPING:
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.59</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>1.31</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.72</FTE>
   </ROW>
How do I create a new record for all unquie combinations of KOSTL and POSID? And total the FTE field for each line? Can this be done in a message mapping?

Hello,
How do I create a new record for all unquie combinations of KOSTL and POSID? And total the FTE field for each line? Can this be done in a message mapping?
Yes, very much possible with or without UDF. See sample mapping below without using UDF:
For ROW:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> collapseContext -> ROW
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For KOSTL:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> collapseContext -> splitByValue:eachValue -> KOSTL
POSID(set context to row) -> /      KOSTL(set context to row) ->/                                          /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For POSID:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> collapseContext -> splitByValue:eachValue -> POSID
POSID(set context to row) -> /      POSID(set context to row) ->/                                          /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For FTE:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> sum -> splitByValue:eachValue -> FTE
POSID(set context to row) -> /      FTE(set context to row) ->/                                            /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
Hope this helps,
Mark

Message Mapping - NewLine generation in the target field

Hi ,
This is a File to SOAP scenario, where text file is picked by XI and posted to target using webservice in the xml format.In the message mapping, I am supposed perform a logic where 3 fields in the source structured are to be concatenated and sent to the target structure. This fields at the target structure are to be displayed with a newline character.
So if I am sending : abc, 123 and xyz as input and the output should be in one field as follows :
<ns3:OutputField xmlns:ns3=abc
123
xyz</ns3:StreetAddressLine>
I have used this "
" as the seperator in the concat function, hoping this would produce a new line but was hopeless.
Any ideas are appreicated.
Thanks,
Rag

Hi Raghav,
XML will never show new line or space characters.
Try to open the message in notepad or wordpad and then check if you can see the new line character.
-Supriya.

XI Message Monitoring - Mapping custom fields for search in monitor?

Is it possible to map a reference field so that searching for a specific message is more user friendly?
For example, we produce hundreds of outbound SHPMNT04 messages each day. Would it be possible to map a field such as E1EDT20.TKNUM (Shipment Number) to a field in the monitor (SXMB_MONI) such as "Outbound Reference" so we can easily search on this field?
Currently we use a combination of WE09 and IDX5 to find a specific message. Obviously, this is cumbersome and time-consuming.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
of course it is possible in many ways
there are at least two ways
the first one is to use Trex search for xi + standard
the second one is described in this weblog + but remember that
without indexing this will take long to search like this
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/02/14/super-message-monitor-for-sap-xi
Regards,
michal

How to check a field in Message mapping wether it is Non Numeric?

Hi XI Guru's
I am totally new to XI world, Kindly help hopw can I chexk a field while doing message mapping whether the field is non numeric or not.
I dont find any built in function for the same.
If it is using UDF can some body help me in providoing a UDF for this.
Many Thanks
Arun

Hi Arun,
In SAP PI, all the XML contents by default treated as STRINGS.
So if u want to check whether the incoming field is numeric or not... the only way is to write a UDF code for the same.
the UDF will be,
1. At first
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
in functions.
2.UDF content:
input: field,container
output:boolean
Code
boolean return_Value;
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("[0-9]*"); // If u are using the decimals please change the regular expression accordingly.
Matcher m = p.matcher(field);
if(m.matches())
retuen_Value = true;
else
return_Value = false;
return return_Value ;
I hope this will solve ur problem....
Babu

Searching a Field In Source or Target Message in Message Mapping

Hey Guys,
I came accross this peculiar behaviour and it keeps bugging me , I could search any field in source or target message in message mapping in PI 7.0 by copying the path( /ns1:MaestroAcreedores/Acreedores/ClaveDeGrupo or any idoc field /FIDCCP02/IDOC/E1FIKPF/BUDAT ) but in PI 7.1 i cant , its giving me an error String /ns1:MaestroAcreedores/Acreedores/ClaveDeGrupo not found , i can only search the field independently.Can anyone please help me out in this.

Hi
I am not sure whether it worked in 7.0 or not, but having checked myself i can confirm that it is not working in 7.1 in my system also.
For alternative, you can check by changing into source text view where it will display as xml. Here when you search the keyword, it would display you the hierarchy better than normal view.
I dont think there is any other alternative. although I would say in the worst case scenario you would not have more than 10-15 occurrences of same element in an idoc.
Regards
Krish

Calling Message mapping Dynamically based on a field value

Hi gurus,
I have
1 source inteface
1 target interface
3 Message mapping programs based on the 1 source and 1 Target Interfaces
I need to decide Dynamically as which message mapping program should be called based on the Input provided by the source system.
For example:
If the souce side file sends a field value=1 then message mapping 1 should be called
If the source side file sends a field value=2 then message mapping 2 should be used...
Pls provide me help on this ASAP.

As ur source and target structures are always same, u should have used same mapping with multiple conditions instead of using three different mappings.
Right now for ur requirement, in ID -> standard Interface Determination, u can use multiple interface mappings based on condition.
Check heading "Specifying Conditions (for Multiple Inbound Interfaces)" here
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/ea20e737f33ee9e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Regards,
Prateek

Message Mapping delete Field

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for