Message posting for all users?

Dear all
Is there any possibility of Posting a messages in portal for all customers and individual customers as well?
We have different list of customers, who will access the portal and do some transactions. we want to post some messages to list of customers and individual users also.
Kindly suggest me
Rgds
Pradeep
Message was edited by: Pradeep Reddy

hi pradeep,
The following blogs explain how to broadcast a message to all the portal users...
Brodcast messages to logged on users in Portal(Part1)
Brodcast messages to logged on users in Portal(Part2)
Do some modifications in the code for sending messages to individual users or groups.
Hope this helps...
Regs,
jaga

Similar Messages

  • Search for all user messages doesnot work now ?

    Hello SDNer's,
    I often search my own questions and posts entering the keywords in Search for all user messages. After our forum has been revamped this functionality seems not be working as it used to. When I enter the keywords and Enter it throws me results from Expert Forums instead showing results just from my ID/Username.
    Have anyone noticed this ?
    Please comment Mods.
    Happy New Year to all SDNer's !!!

    User search and monitoring was all disabled due to Privacy issues.

  • Configure "Always hide forms document message bar" and "Do not show edit warnings" for all users?

    We need to do a mass deployment of Adobe Reader XI 11.0.3 with "Always hide forms document message bar" preference setting automatically set for every user so they do not have to go through the menu and set it manually.
    Is there a way to configure this for all users with the customization wizard or another method?
    We also need to do the same for "Do not show edit warnings"
    If these are registry keys, which registry keys set these options?

    Try http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/PrefRef/Windows/DocumentStatus.html?zoom _highlight=message#idkeyname_1_5647.
    If that doesn't work and there's a configuration item in the preferences UI, do this:
    Get regshot.
    Close everything but Acrobat/Reader.
    Take a reg shot.
    Configure the setting via the UI.
    Tak another reg shot.
    Compare the two.
    That process will give you your answer.
    If there is no corresponding pref in the UI, then you probably can't do it.
    Ben

  • Security settings for all users

    I recently developed a document that requires digital signatures and have been testing it. The only downside is that when a user opens the document, Adobe prompts for the installation of new security settings, and it installs it for that user only. I need to add a registry key to the new security settings, but it is only available to be added to the current user hive. Does anyone know how to install the new settings for all users?
    Here is the registry key I need to add.
    [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Adobe\Adobe Acrobat\9.0\Security\cPubSec]
    "bSelfSignCertGen"=dword:00000000
    Im using Adobe Reader 9.3 and Win XP.
    Any help would be terrific!
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    There are really two separate issues. First, is Adobe pushing updates to the Acrobat Address Book (i.e. adding certificates as trust anchors) and the second issue is how you can push your own update to disable the creation of self-signed digital IDs. Although the two issues share an underlying mechanism, they are separate and you cannot leverage one for the other.
    First issue first. Adobe has entered into partnership with certain Certificate Authorities and has created a mechanism to add their certificates to the Acrobat Address Book (aka Manage Trusted Identities) using http to send a copy of the Security Settings file that contains only digital IDs. There are two ways to trigger the download process. One is to go into the Preferences, select Trust Manager, and click the Update Now button in the Automatic Updates group box. The other method is to load the DigSig plug-in (beginning with Acrobat 9, plug-ins no longer load a launch in order to speed up the launch process). As I'm sure you have deduced, opening a file with a signature field cause the DigSig plug-in to load which in turn triggers the automatic download. The reason we have limited the automatic download to DigSig being loaded is because the vast majority of people viewing PDFs are not using the digital signature functionality (much to my personal chagrin because the more people use digital signatures, the better my job security ) and we didn't want to bother them with an update they would never need. People already complain that there are too many updates, and we are trying to limit the irritability factor. To close the loop on this function, once the download process has been triggered the Acrobat check two more things before it does the update, 1) has it been a month since I checked and, 2) if it has been a month is there a new file to download. This way we are not pestering people with unneeded updates, or if they do need the update, at least not too often. And finally, Address Book management has to be on a per user basis. A certificate that you may elect to trust could be a certificate that the next person want to specifically keep untrusted. The Windows Certificate Store, Mac Keychain and Firefox Certificate Manager all work on a per user basis.
    That brings us to what you would like to do. The good news is you can use the Export Security Settings featrue to create a distributable file that will set the preference. The real question is how will you distribute the file, but before we get to that, here is how to create the file.
    With Acrobat closed, set the registry setting you noted in the message above
    Launch Acrobat
    Select the Advanced > Security > Export Security Settings menu item
    Click the Deselect All button on the Export Security Settings dialog
    Select the Signing Preferences Settings checkbox
    Click the OK button on the Export Security Settings dialog
    Select Signature Creation Settings and note "Allow creation of self-signed Digital IDs" is set to No
    Click the Export button on the toolbar
    Follow the on screen dialogs. You don't have to encrypt the file, but you must sign it with a certifying signature
    At this point you have the file available for distribution. You could e-mail it to your intended recipients with import instructions, or you could post if for download, or you could set the Preference the to automatically push the file from a server. To check this feature out select the Edit > Preferences menu item and then select Security from the Categories list box. You would need to select the Load security settings from a server checkbox and then set up the URL. As an aside, you can also export these settings by selecting the Automatic Update Settings checkbox on the Export Security Settings dialog noted in the bullet points above. You have a chicken and egg problem in that you have to get the users to first manually import the file in order to set up the automatic import. That I can't help you with, you're just going to have to decide what works best for you.
    Good luck,
    Steve

  • Mountain Lion upgrade effects mail rules for all users

    After upgrading to Mountain Lion, the mail rules appear to be "shared" for all user on our Mac. When a user adds a rule, everyone sees this rule.  Some mail rules are lost in the process.  How can we fix this?

    If it is hanging on the 'upgrading database' portion please see this discussion and the solution posted by registerednderd at the bottom of the first page.  It worked for me at least to get past the 'upgrading database' hangup and then to import the old messages.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4137441

  • How do I set Firefox to be usable for all users on one computer?

    How do I set Firefox to be usable for all users on one computer?

    I would think the about:config entries discussed are ex-factory set to values each user has to change individually, after the installation has run its course. The solution could be to have patched files ready to install post factum:
    [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences A Brief Guide to Mozilla Preferences - MDN]

  • You do not have sufficient privileges to complete this installation for all users of the machine. Log on as administrator and then retry this installation

    Hi all
    Have seen a couple threads regarding this but unfortunately nothing that solves my problem thus far!
    Right now, our developers are using the Domain Admin account to promote their website code using MSI files.  I'd like to change this as I feel the Domain Admin account should be on lock down and only used when absolutely necessary, pretty common.  The
    same goes for my account too, I would like to absolve as much use of the Domain Admin as I can.
    Problem is, when they run installers from their own accounts, they receive this error: You do not have sufficient privileges
    to complete this installation for all users of the machine. Log on as administrator and then retry this installation
    The accounts they are using are part of the Built In Administrators group and the Domain Admins group... I'm not sure what other permission you'd need in a domain?  We've gone as far as explicitly giving them local admin access on this server and still
    nothing changes.
    Is there a Group Policy or something that I can change to provide install rights and possibly remove these accounts as Domain Admin and more along the line of Power User?
    Thanks much for your help!
    Ryan

    Hi,
    You could use Software Restriction Policies (SRP’s) or Applocker(supported on Windows server 2008 R2/Windows 7 only) to restrict the running
    of the application for specific user.
    Description of the Software Restriction Policies
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310791
    HOW TO: Restrict Users from Running Specific Windows Programs
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323525
    How to Implement Group Policy Security Filtering
    http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/Group-Policy-Security-Filtering.htmlPlease remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Adding a domain user to the admin role within the local user management breaks all metro apps for all users!!

    Hi,
    I have posted this in another large thread under the "Windows 8 General" group but have not had any appropriate feedback from MS.
    After hours of testing and working with other users I have managed to isolate a simple situation that breaks all metro ui applications within Windows 8 for all users on the machine. Here are my exact steps and notes.
    Before continuing if you are running Avast then your solution may be to turn of the behaviour shield functionality as this also breaks metro apps. This is NOT the problem we are having!
    I have performed 3 cleans installs after isolating the problem and am able to reproduce the issue every time using the same steps on two different machines. 
    First thing to say is that for us it has nothing to do with simply joining the domain, domain/group policies nor does it appear to have anything to do with the software we installed, the problem here is much more simple but the result is pretty terrible.
    Here are my exact steps of what I did to reproduce our problem:
    Complete format of HDD in preperation for a clean install
    Clean install performed
    Set up the machine initially with a local account
    Test metro apps - all working fine
    Open control panel from the desktop, click on System, change the system to join the domain, click reboot
    Log into the system using my domain account
    Test metro apps - all working fine
    Here's were the problem starts. I need my domain account to have admin rights on the local machine so I can install programs without the IT men having to come over and enter their password every 5 mins.
    I go to control panel via the desktop and click on User Accounts. From with here I then click on "Manage User Accounts". This requires the IT guys to enter their details to give me access to such functionality. This is fine
    In the dialog box that opens I can only see the local user that was initially created during setup. The "Group" for this local account shows as "Administrators" - Image included below (important to note that metro apps are working at this point)
    I click add and then add my domain account - also giving it administrator access
    Sign off or reboot to ensure the new security is applied
    Sign back in to the domain account
    Test metro - ALL BROKEN
    Sign out
    Sign in as local account
    Test Metro - NOW ALL BROKEN FOR THIS USER ALSO
    So as soon as I add my domain account to the local user accounts and set it as admin it breaks all metro apps for all users. This is on a totally clean install with nothing at all installed other than the OS.
    Annoyingly if I go back and change the domain account to a standard user or if I totally remove the domain account from the local account management system the problem does not go away for either user. basically it is now permanently broken. The only fix I
    could fathom was a full re install and not giving the domain user admin access to the local  machine.
    Screen one - this is the local user accounts window AFTER joining the domain and logging in with my domain account (All metro apps working at this point)
    Screen 2: User accounts AFTER joining the domain and AFTER adding domain account to local user management (METRO BROKEN)
    I have isolated my machine from all group policies so nothing like that is affecting me. Users I have spoken to in different companies have policies that automatically add users to the local user management. This means that metro apps break as
    soon as they join the domain which leads them to wrongly think it is group policies causing the error. Once they isolate themselves from this they can reproduce following my steps.
    Thanks

    Hi Juke,
    Thank you for the response and apologies for the delay in getting back to you. My machine was running a long task so I couldn't try your suggested solution.
    I had already tried running the registry merge suggested at the top of the thread to no avail. I had not tried deleting the OLE key totally so I did that and the problem still exists. I will post all the errors I see in event viewer below. For
    your info, since posting my initial comment I have sent out my steps to 7 different people and we can all reproduce the problem. This comes to 10 different machines (3 of them mine then the other guys) in 3 different businesses / domains. We see the same errors
    in event viewer.
    Under "Windows Logs" --> "Application" : I get two separate error events the first reads "Activation of app winstore_cw5n1h2txyewy!Windows.Store failed with error: The app didn't start. See the Microsoft-Windows-TWinUI/Operational log for additional
    information." The second arrives in the log about 15 seconds after the first and reads "App winstore_cw5n1h2txyewy!Windows.Store did not launch within its allotted time."
    Under "Windows Logs" --> "System" : I get one error that reads "The server Windows.Store did not register with DCOM within the required timeout."
    Under "Applications And Services Logs" --> "Microsoft" -->  "Windows" --> "Apps" --> "Microsoft-Windows-TWinUI/Operational" : I get one error that reads "Activation of the app winstore_cw5n1h2txyewy!Windows.Store for the
    Windows.Launch contract failed with error: The app didn't start."
    If you require any further information just let me know and I will provide as much as I can.
    Thanks

  • How to set up new enviroment variables permanently for all users?

    Hi.
    I downloadad Apache Tomcat, and need to set enviromental variables for all users.
    I tryed setenv commad, but it is not found.
    for example # JAVA_HOME="/opt/jre1.6.0" Solaris remembers this variable only for one session and I need for all users permanently.
    Thanks.

    Thank you.
    This file contains a script. Is there difference in putting that line in beginning or end of the file?
    #ident     "@(#)profile     1.19     01/03/13 SMI"     /* SVr4.0 1.3     */
    # The profile that all logins get before using their own .profile.
    trap ""  2 3
    export LOGNAME PATH
    if [ "$TERM" = "" ]
    then
         if /bin/i386
         then
              TERM=sun-color
         else
              TERM=sun
         fi
         export TERM
    fi
    #     Login and -su shells get /etc/profile services.
    #     -rsh is given its environment in its .profile.
    case "$0" in
    -sh | -ksh | -jsh | -bash)
         if [ ! -f .hushlogin ]
         then
              /usr/sbin/quota
              #     Allow the user to break the Message-Of-The-Day only.
              trap "trap '' 2"  2
              /bin/cat -s /etc/motd
              trap "" 2
              /bin/mail -E
              case $? in
              0)
                   echo "You have new mail."
              2)
                   echo "You have mail."
              esac
         fi
    esac
    umask 022
    trap  2 3
    # Intel Server Control - The following lines
    # let the LRA daemon access the X server
    if [ -f /usr/bin/X11/xhost -a -f //isc/lra ]
    then
         ttyname=`tty`
         ttyname=`basename $ttyname`
         ttykind=`tty | egrep "console|vt"`
         whereami=`finger -s | grep $ttyname | cut -c61-`
         if [ "$whereami" = "" -a "$ttykind" = ""  ]
         then
              CURDIS=$DISPLAY
              DISPLAY=unix:0.0
              export DISPLAY
              /usr/X/bin/xhost +unknown 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
              DISPLAY=$CURDIS
         fi
    fi

  • Set default application for *all* users

    Hello people, my 1st post here, so forgive me for possible imprecisions, ambiguity, inappropriateness....
    When I search how to set/change the default app for opening some type of file I always find the answer "through the getinfo". But doing that, I only change the default application for the current user.
    I want to do that for all users of my mac, without repeating the getinfo process for each of them.
    Is there any adminstrative tools for doing that?
    Thank you.

    You could download and install RCDefaultApp 2.1 for all users: check the Read Me and then test it on something to see if it accomplishes what you want.
    http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/

  • How to make warehouse field inactive for all users in all documents autom.

    Hi All,
    Can anyone pls tell me "**how to make warehouse field inactive for all users in all documents without having to do it through form setting** "for each and every user. It should be visible but inactive
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mukesh Agrawal

    Hi,
    As a work around create a warehouse SelectWH and map the mandatory acoounts as a On hold account(in chart of accounts).So there will not be any posting on this account.
    And set this warehouse as default warehouse for all users.
    So without selecting the appropriate warehouse the user can not add the document.
    I think this might resolve you issue.

  • Default Color, Size and Font for all user.

    Hi
    I have been looking around for the correct way to set some default styles for all Word users in a domain thrugh GPO. I just have some questions.
    So far i can only get it working if it set a "Workgroup templates path" under "User Configuration/Administrative Templates/Microsoft Office 2013/Shared paths". Then the users are able to select it when they say "New" - "Shared"
    and then the template
    But i would like it to be default for all users, like in the Normal.dotm. But without making a script to replace the file for every users APPDATA.
    Then i saw the "User Configuration/Administrative Templates/Microsoft Office 2013/Shared paths/Enterprise templates path", how and what does that do?

    Hi,
    As far as I know, if we want to distribute the Normal.dotm to users in a domain through GPO, we could
    use GPP file extension to
    distribute Normal.dotm to the path "C:\Documents and Settings\user name\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates." for every user. For more detailed steps, please refer to the following link:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772536.aspx
    Similar issue:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/87ab10d3-1cb6-4269-9334-1e0c37527e0a/move-location-of-normaldotdotm-to-central-file-server-best-solution?forum=winserverGP
    If you want to config Enterprise templates path, please read this thread:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/c4e5c872-402c-4339-9c02-cfa91e949e41/office-2013-templates-group-policies?forum=officesetupdeploy
    If you have further question about the GPO, I recommend you post it to GPO forum:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?forum=winserverGP
    Regards,
    George Zhao
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click "[email protected]"

  • CP3525dn, networked -- default duplex for all users (embedded web server)

    I want to set the default for all users on our networked CP3525dn to be duplex. I cannot find this option anywhere in the embedded web server. I have duplex turned on, of course, and users can set their own default to duplex, but I want it to be default for everyone--the default default, if you will.
    Is this possible? I'm fairly certain it's possible if the printer is connected to a computer and shared on the network (but I don't remember the specifics) but I can't find out how to do it if it's on the network on its own.
    Thanks!

    I don't believe you can.  It must be set for every user manually.
    Say thanks by clicking the Kudos Thumbs Up to the right in the post.
    If my post resolved your problem, please mark it as an Accepted Solution ...
    I worked for HP but now I'm retired!

  • Maximum message size for internal users

    Hi,
    Is it possible to configure a maximum message size for internal users and also create exceptions?
    The templates available in Transport Rules only allow for "when size of any attachment is greater or equal". This is not ideal as users can add 50 X 1MB attachaments to an email etc.
    Configuring Transport settings or Receive Connectors do not allow for exceptions.
    Thank you.

    Hi Prakash,
    Thanks for the link to the thread. The AD site link configuration is valid but does not account for the required exceptions. E.g User A can send unlimited size message to User B but not to User C.
    The thread also mentions the Transport Rule configuration stated in my original post but that configuration has one major flaw. Users can circumvent the control by splitting attachments.

  • How can I allow or block the use of local storage by specific sites for all users in my domain.

    How can I allow or block the use of local storage by specific sites for all users in my domain.
    I tried to do this by MMS.cfg but it is not working, the problem is also described in your blog "http://forums.adobe.com/message/3272907".
    What I Want -: "I want to allow youtube for all the users in my domain and this should be listed in Control panel-->flash player-->storage-->local storage setting by site-->websites tab."

    Wow, cor-el... Did you -intend- your reply to be inane, inappropriate and completely inapplicable?
    How would that possibly do what I asked?
    You -might- consider '''''reading''''' the question, -=before=- you reply. And it's really okay to NOT REPLY if you just don't know. Just an idea.
    Feel better, real soon.

Maybe you are looking for