Message splitting without ccBPM

My scenario is as follows
FILE ---> XI ---> FILE
The data is exchanged as XML. The structure is pretty simple, multiple records exist in a file and each record has multiple columns.
No mapping required. This interface is currently in production in our environment.
We have a requirement now to split the target file into multiple files by date. The data is a column in the payload. So we need to combine all records that have the same date into their own separate target files.
I dont want to use ccBPM due to the performance overhead it has. I dont have any other mapping requirements other than this.
Does anyone have any idea on how this can be done?
Regards
Haseeb

Hi,
May not be a good solution but analyse and try to implement.
in general for a message
root node -- 1..1 or 0..1 as occurrences
recordset -- 0..unbound as occurrences
Now Change it to
Message1 -
0..unbound to come (optional)
root node -- 0..unbound as occurrences
recordset -- 0..unbound as occurrences
Before doing the below you need to do the sortind based on the date and per eache message one date records shhould be populated.. handle in UDF
message should be created multiple times.. .. no need to handle in adapter level , you need to handle in interface determination level.. check the below link
it will be created multiple..
see the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Chilla

Similar Messages

Message splitting without bpm

Could anyone please give any idea or links about end to end configuration for message splitting without using bpm.
Thanks
sabyasachi
Edited by: Sabyasachi Mohapatra on Apr 7, 2009 11:50 AM

Hi Sameerr
.i have one sender & 2 receivers.Please guide how to configure end to end in the receiver determination step & interface determination step.How many sender & receiver agreements need to be configured.
Thanks & Regards
Sabyasachi

Message Split without BPM - Error

Hi,
I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
Error Category : MAPPING
Error Code : GENERIC
I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sri.

Hi Venkat,
I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
============================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
Thanks,
Sri.

Message split without BPM?

Can we do correlation (message merge) without bpm. I mean Is there any adwanced service pack which support this,so that we can avoid bpm?

Hi,
Ur subject and ur question is confusing.....
Message split means splitting the one message into N message that is 1:N
And message merge is merging the N message to 1 message N:1.
Wat u want to do...can you pls explain with example.
Correlation is a functionality provided in BPM.
Thnx
Chirag

Problem with Mulit Mapping/Message Split

Hi,
I am a newbie to XI trying to set up a file2file scenario with multi-mapping/message splitting without BPM.
System is XI 3.0 SP14
Scenario is:
read an XML-File and multiply it and write 2 XML-files using the File adaptor.
For reference I used "multimapping without BPM".
- setting occurancy of Message types to unbounded in both Message Mapping and Interface Mapping.
- using the RB_Split button
- setting up one business service containing 2 message interfaces and 2 communication channels for output.
Designing and Konfiguring worked fine.
File is read but no file is written.
XML-Moni tells me "Mapping did not create Messages"
I did extensive studies in sap.help, forum and various blogs. Also to verify Messagetypes and Kommunication channels I set up similar file2file scenario without splitting. Nothing really helped.
Any clues?

Hi again,
very efficient method to test XML-source file. - Thanks.
Unfortunately it did not solve my problem.
Again: "Split mapping did not create messages"
Below you can find a part of the trace created when processing this message:
<Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Load ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472, http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class (http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1) in swcv ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 1 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 2 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 005</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 005</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 006</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
Test of MM and IM is always successful.
Any clues?

Reg:message splitting

How to achieve message splitting without using BPM?
give me the weblog which shows complete details about it

Hi
There are two important blogs for the same
1:N mapping without using BPM: /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, its possible!/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Thanks
Abhishek Mahajan
***Please Reward points if helpful***

The N:M message spliting without BPM in PI7.1 ???

Hi,experts
I'm doing an scenario which implements the N:M messages split without BPM...
The data type structure as below:
================================
SOURCE_TEST
 A 0...1
 B 0...1
 C 0...1
 D 0...1
 E 0...1
================================
TARGET1_TEST
 F 0...1
 G 0...1
================================
TARGET2_TEST
 H 0...1
 I 0...1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now i want to split msgs and do the mapping as A-->F,B--->G and D>H,E--
>I which depends on the C value,,
for instance,if C="1" then generate TARGET1_TEST,if C="2" then generate TARGET2_TEST
and i changed the signature tab,set the occurence of SOURCE_TEST 0....unbounded,
added the two target msg type into the Target messages and also set the occurence of them 0...unbounded.
Then did the mapping(the mapping implemented no problem,it's sure)
after did the operation mapping,do the ID objects as below:
one sender bussiness component,one sender communication channel,one interface determination,one receiver determination,one send agreement,one receive business component,two receiver communication channel,two receiver agreements
the issue now is when i do the " test configuration" in ID,it pops up "Runtime error Split mapping created no messages"
but i go to check the operation mapping and cannot find any issue in it coz it's as fine as message mapping
could anybody shed some lights on it?
Thanks in adv.
Regards.

oh....is it really we cannot implement it without BPM or just you havn't do that?i just saw a blog written about 1:N without BPM and it's said we can do N:M similarly,so i want to have a try,now it pops up the errors as below:
Runtime error
Split mapping created no messages
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping 97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping 6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA_JDK </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM attachments are written to the payload </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Executing multi-mapping </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** START APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document start </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document end </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** END APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_). </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 1 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 2 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario - ( Without BPM )

I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
A-->B
B-->C
In the 2nd Mapping step I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
2nd Mapping step is as follows
Source 1..1
Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
 field1 0..1
 field2 0..1
 filed3 0..1
Target
Message 1
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
 Idoc Structure..
Message 2
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 3
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 4
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages ( 1 each under each Message )
Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
Thanks for any help..RK

Hi,
See the blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
- we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
- we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.
Please see the bwlow threads also..
IDOC Splitting
File To IDOC Thru XI
Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
Regards
Chilla..

How to split messages without using Message split (BPM)

In file to file scenario how to split messages coming from file without using Message split (BPM)

Thank you very much.

Message Splitting issue (without bpm)

Hi Experts,
I was currently trying to create a message split (1 message --> 2 output) using BPM like in this blog: Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
Then i noticed that it was also possible to achieve this without using BPM (creating a interface mapping with 2 outputs, and using the interface determination with the extended option) like on this one:
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
(but using the structure showed in the first blog since i was just testing)
The issue i have is that even when it worked, and i see all good in the XML monitoring (SMXB_MONI) the both resulting files appear only with one field, and i can't see the others
Example from the XML monitoring:
ORIGINAL FILE: (I split based on the id 1 and 2)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:bpm_in_MT xmlns:ns="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <details>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</details>
- <details>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
</details>
</record>
</ns:bpm_in_MT>
RESULT FILE 1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out_MT>
RESULT FILE 2:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out1_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
<age>20</age>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out1_MT>
HERE's the ISSUE:
Files in the FTP folder:
file1.txt with only "Jorge "
file2.txt with only "Fernando "
when the first file should have 2 fields (id is included), and the second one should be name (id and age included)
Could this be a parsing issue? i'm confused since i see no errors in the channels
I'm using 2 FTP receivers channels with Content conversion
CC_FTP_first_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1
info.keyFieldValue 1
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
CC_FTP_second_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id,age
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1,2
info.keyFieldValue 2
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
I may have no use for the keyfieldvalue since i'm only saving that file in FTP, but i already removed that and it didn't change much, i still get 2 files, but only with the "name" tag on them
Any ideas??
i'm sure i'm missing something basic, but i'm don't have much experience on XML
Thanks!

Hi,
This is really intersting as well as unexpected result...if you used directly the XML format then 2 fiels are created with appropriate data with all fields....
And if you used the FCC then , fields are missing...so one thing is clear that as you have already said..issue is with FCC only...
Have you tried to process only single file with FCC instead of 2 files at a time.
Also if possible try out with fieldSeperator parameter instead of FixedFieldLenghts...see whats the result...
I hope this will give you the hint...
Thanks
swarup

Message splitting 1:n without BPM error : 404 Not Found

hi,
is u r server is updated with sps14
please once check this.. may be this is the problem
Thanks,
Madhav.
Note:points if useful

hi,
please go through the limitation of this bolg
A mapping-based message split will ultimately produce n individual messages, but not until it reaches the Adapter Engine (AE). Inside the Integration Engine (IE), the messages are grouped together and persisted as one bulk message. The bulk message is sent to the AE where it splits the bulk message into individual messages and persists them.
Restrictions
u2022 Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC/HTTPmassagee splits are not supported since the IDOC/HTTP adapter is not part of the AE.
u2022 The target system of the message splits cannot be an integration process.
u2022 Attachments from the original message are not appended to the messages resulting from the message split.
now i think u wont be able to send the the 2 diffrent file in diffrent location.both the file cab be sent to be togethre.because when u configure the receiver determination in ID u need to include both receiver service as a receiver.and thus u need to configuer 4 interface determinatio as well as 4 receiver aggrement. this is because you r using the only one IM which containg both the interface.
regards,
navneet

BPM Configuration in Message Split

Hi All,
My scenario 1:2 Message Split is like this....
Message types: MT_INPUT,MT_OUTPUT1,MT_OUTPUT2.
Message Interfaces: MI_INPUT(OUTBOUND),MI_INPUT_ABS(ABS),MI_OUTPUT1(INBOUND),MI_OUTPUT1_ABS(ABS),MI_OUTPUT2(INBOUND),MI_OUTPUT2_ABS(ABS).
Message Mappings: Source is MT_INPUT and target is MT_OUTPUT1,MT_OUTPUT2(MM_Message_Split)
Interface Mappings: Souce is MT_INPUT_ABS(ABS) and traget is MI_OUTPUT1_ABS,MI_OUTPUT2_ABS(IM_Multiple Files).
BPM steps are:One recieve step,transformation step,Fork.
Fork Branch-1:Reciever determination and Send Output1
Fork Branch-2:Reciever determination and Send Output2.
I didn't create any correlation ID in BPM.
In the configuration of XI I know that I have to create 3 reciever determinations,3 Interface Determinations, 2 Reciever agreements and 1 sender agreement.
But I am fumbling to find out the flow of message interfaces involved here, especially in the interface determinations.
Please help me, I am a newbie to BPM.........

Hi Vijaya,
go through this you can get some idea
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
/people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
without using bpm:-
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/06/29/message-splitting-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
sekhar

BPM Message Split in Block par for Each: Just last message is sent n-times

Hello everybody,
we got BPM with a message split. In a par-for-each block the message is send.
Asuming I have 3 lines in the multiline container element, I can see in SXMB_MONI that that message is send 3 times.
The error is, that 3 times the last message is send.
Sample Error:
Message incoming in BPM:
<root>
<mymessage>M1</mymessage>
<mymessage>M2</mymessage>
<mymessage>M3</mymessage>
</root>
Messages outgoing:
<root>
<mymessage>M3</mymessage>
</root>
<root>
<mymessage>M3</mymessage>
</root>
<root>
<mymessage>M3</mymessage>
</root>
--> As you can see, just the last message M3 is send 3 times!
What can I do?
Regards Mario

If I take the payload from SXMB_MONI an try to test, I get an syntax error when I copy&paste the data into the message mapping.
This is very strange, because
a) the message mapping is done on basis of imported IDOCs!
b) the BPM works without throwing a mapping error
So what should I do?

BPM: error at exactly 2500 messages after message split: no coincidence?

Hi everybody,
we poll a message, split it in BPm and than call a WebService.
We got an error exactly after 2500 messages were processed successful.
Is there a special parameter which influences the BPM?
Thanks a lot
Regards Mario

Hi,
In SXMB_ADM you can set the time out higher for the sync processing.
Go to Integration Processing in SXMB_ADM and add parameter SA_COMM CHECK_FOR_ASYNC_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT to 120 (seconds). You can also increase the number of parallel processes if you have more waiting now. SA_COMM CHECK_FOR_MAX_SYNC_CALLS from 20 to XX. All depends on your hardware but this helped me from the standard 60 seconds to go to may be 70 in some cases.
Make sure that your calling system does not have a timeout below that you set in XI otherwise yours will go on and finish and your partner may end up sending it twice
when you go for BPM the whole workflow
has to come into action so for example
when your mapping last < 1 sec without bpm
if you do it in a BPM the transformation step
can last 2 seconds + one second mapping...
(that's just an example)
so the workflow gives you many design possibilities
(brigde, error handling) but it can
slow down the process and if you have
thousands of messages the preformance
can be much worse than having the same without BPM
see below links
http://help.sap.com/bp_bpmv130/Documentation/Operation/TuningGuide.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/d92e428819da2ce10000000a1550b0/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/3.0/sap%20exchange%20infrastructure%20tuning%20guide%20xi%203.0.pdf
BPM Performance tuning
BPM Performance issue
BPM performance question
BPM performance- data aggregation persistance
Regards
Chilla..

IDOC_TO_FILE ALEAUDIT message SPLIT

Hi,
1.   I am sending an IDOC from R3 to XI.
2.   In XI IDOC splits in to 2 messages
3.   XI sends the 2 messages to 2 File systems(FTP).
4.   NO BPM, tried on SP19 / SP20,
5.    Expected 2 ALEAUDIT messages back to R/3
Problem:
    ALEAUDIT messages are not reaching the R/3.
Additional Info:
1. I dont have any problem in receiving ALEAUDIT message in IDOC_XI_FILE scenario with out message split, means one receiver. Problem is with message split and 2 receivers.
Thanks in advance.
Moni

Hi Moni,
Please check following points -
1. Do you get any error in SXMB_MONI transaction in XI? Whats happening to the response messages there? Are you able to see any entry in SXMB_MONI for that?
2. Also ALEAUDIT idoc only allows few statuses not all. It will be worth checking which status is being passed back to R3. (This will not be relevent in you case as the scenario works without message split...)
3. Check if you have set up partner profiles correctly and corresponding parter number is set in Idoc specific attributes in adapter channel.
Hope this helps.
Rahul.

Message splitting without ccBPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for