Method analysis

Hi,
I am trying to analysis a method that exists in a group of classes. What I need to do is to find out what's going on in the method by using reflection on the .class file. If I need to I can even parse the whole method as a string. But I couldn't find a way to get the 'inside' of the method. So far I could only get the method's param list, return type and annotations, but NOT what's going on inside.
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks

Reflection does not give you access to a methods byte code. To get it you must parse the class file. The classfile is very complex. http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/ClassFile.doc.html
You may want to search the internet for free code that will parse it for you. Also, depending on what you want to do, you may find AspectJ or Jboss AOP helpful.

Similar Messages

Livecache Alert Monitor C: No method assigned

Hello All,
Can you please add thoughts to my query:
In livecache alert Monitor, I double clicked on Health---->Database Structure Check and got the pop up:
LAB\MaxDB Monitoring: LCA\...\Database Structure
C: No method assigned
I checked Properties tab -
>methods ( methods effective for MTE nodes )
Data collection method is SDB_coll_info_ct.
Auto-reaction method : NO method
Analysis method: No method:
Which method should be assigned.
SCM 5.0 , livecache 7.6.It's not urgent.but appreciate a help.Thanks
Regards,
Tushar

Hi Roland,
Thanks for the info.We are on basis pack 11.Livecache verison: 7.6.02 BUILD 008-123-147-134
Regards,
Tushar
Message was edited by:
Tushar Chavan

Internal error at method Method 521 after CC static checker is run.

After running the static checker on my solution, does all the usual hoo hah, and then throws internal error at method Method 521 at me.
any idea what causes this? It seems intermittent at times. But occurs quite often nonetheless.
here's the output from VS2013:
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Validated: 96.1%
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Checked 1592 assertions: 1511 correct 63 unknown (19 masked)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Contract density: 2.46
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Total methods analyzed 251
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Methods analyzed with a faster abstract domain 0
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Method analyses read from the cache 250
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Methods with 0 warnings 206
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Time spent in internal, potentially costly, operations
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Overall time spent performing action #KarrPutIntoRowEchelonForm: 00:00:00.2040141 (invoked 17139 times)
Overall time spent performing action #KarrIsBottom: 00:00:00.0670060 (invoked 11034 times)
Overall time spent performing action #ArraysAssignInParallel: 00:00:00.1240101 (invoked 22 times)
Overall time spent performing action #ArraysJoin: 00:00:00.0870076 (invoked 11 times)
Overall time spent performing action #Simplex: 00:00:00.6190450 (invoked 930 times)
Overall time spent performing action #SubPolyJoin: 00:00:00.5090412 (invoked 25 times)
Overall time spent performing action #WP: 00:00:01.2251006 (invoked 7 times)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Total time 13.458sec. 53ms/method
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Retained 0 preconditions after filtering
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Inferred 0 object invariants
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Retained 0 object invariants after filtering
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Detected 0 code fixes
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Proof obligations with a code fix: 0
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreamsRenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Internal error at method Method 521 : System.Diagnostics.Contracts.ContractDeclarativeAssemblyAttribute.#ctor()
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Failed with uncaught exception: Input string was not in a correct format.
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: Stack trace: at System.Text.StringBuilder.AppendFormat(IFormatProvider provider, String format, Object[] args)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at System.String.Format(IFormatProvider provider\, String format\, Object[] args)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.RemoteWriterOutput`2.RemoteEmitOutcome(Boolean additional\, ProofOutcome outcome\, APC pc\, String format\, Object[] args)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.RemoteWriterOutput`2.EmitOutcomeAndRelated(Witness witness\, String format\, Object[] args)
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.QuantitativeOutput`2.Flush()
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.QuantitativeOutput`2.Close()
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.Clousot.TypeBinder`9.InternalAnalyze()
CodeContracts: RenameMeOrIWillForeverHauntYourDreams.Interop.Win32: \n at Microsoft.Research.CodeAnalysis.Clousot.TypeBinder`9.Analyze()

Further digging reveals that this has something to do with the caching of static checker results. If I do not cache or delete the cache in sql, it takes significantly longer to run (ala 20 minutes as opposed to 1), but runs as expected.

Sub-total in a XML Crosstab report

Hi,
Can anyone help me to get the subtotal for the crosstab within another group report.
Format is like this:
Method
Analysis Unit Test1 Test2 Test3 ....... Avg
Quanity Moisture % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Ash (db) % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Protein % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Weight % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Edible Broken % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Discolored % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Food G % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Non-Edible Impurities % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
Stones/Soil % 13.35 13.40 13.40 13.38
In the above format, Test method is a group and Analysis is another group. Test1, Test2, Test3... are a cross tab within this group. I am unable to place the subtotal and grand total for the cross tab data.
Thanks.

It has been achieved by using the following XML tag.
<?for-each-group@column:G_NAME;CROSSTAB_COL_NAME?>

IMac G5 external FW drives - measuring max connection support

I'm looking for information about the number of external FW HDs that can be connected to the 2 external FW ports on an iMac G5 (2GHzSP). Practical, not theoretical.
I get the basics, and understand the 8w capacity of the iMac G5 to support unpowered external FW 400 devices.
I'm looking for three things -
1) a block diagram of the iMac G5 design, esp. as it has to do with the relationship between the cpu, i/o bus, FW controller, FW PHY & FW port connectors
2) a methodical analysis of the capacity of the iMac G5 to support x number of external FW400 devices that are daisychained and have their own power supplies
3) an analysis on the pros & cons of daisychaining off 1 vs. both of the 2 FW connectors on the iMac G5
Thanks for any information you can point me to.

Ron, you're awesome! I knew all I had to do was wait for daylight to hit Australia and I'd have my answer
Well, as you usual I tried a number of things different instead of one thing at a time and it works, so I don't know what did it. But I changed one of the firewire cables, and I booted them up one at a time (about a full minute apart) instead of all at once.
Looking at the System Profiler I'm not sure who makes the chipset, and the cases are pretty non-descript. But in the profiler the manufacturer for all three happens to read: Prolific PL3507 Combo Device, or just PL3507 Combo Device.
Two of the three are: 1394 ATAPI,Rev 1.00
and the third is: 1394-ATAPI rev1.10
All three drives also list this:
Unit Software Version: 0x10483
Unit Spec ID: 0x609E
Firmware Revision: 0x12804
Well, its working now! If you post this same reply at
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=490329
I'll mark you as having solved it.
Thanks!

Str or strcmp in JAVA?

Hello all,
i have to parse a large String for recurrent information. I could write now a parse method analysing the String caracter per caracter.... My question is, isn�t there already a method / class for doing this? I don't like to
reinvent the wheel...
NB: the StringTokenizer is not suitable for my problem...
Marc

Hi,
sorry that my question is a little unclear.
The idea is simple:
I have to parse a table row:
If there is content in it, I will add it to an output StringBuffer
small example of the problem:
the following row will be added:
<TR><TD param1 param2>bla bla</TD><TD param 1>&nbsp,</TD>.....</TR>
If it is an empty row, I skip it.
<TR><TD param1 param2> </TD><TD param 1> </TD><TD> </TD</TR>
Note that the "empty" field, here , is a given parameter: emtpyFlag.
Do do this, I want to program the following method:
private boolean isRowEmpty(row,emptyFlag) {}
so, if isRowEmtpy(row, emptyFlag) is true => skip row, otherwise add row.
My question is:
is there already an convenient method for this? Otherwise I�m going to use the String class methods for programming an own solution. (substring(a,b), indexof(str), etc)
The second underlying question is:
how does those parsing affect performance in JAVA? Is it fast; or are they other and faster solutions (even if more complex)? Because it has to be added to an already complex servlet.
Marc

Vendor's payment due analysis - Payment method wise

Hi Sapients,
We currently use transaction S_ALR_87012078 to analyse what vendors are due and payable at any given date. At the moment this cannot (or we don't know how) get this split by payment method T (EFTs) and C (Cheques).
Is this something that can be done in the same report or some another report there for the purpose?
Rgds,
BABA

Hi VVR,
Please note that while creating the vendor invoice thru FB60 / MIRO, we do not put the payment method there and even we don't want to put as we have the Automatic payment program F110 in place. The way you are saying will only be possible when the payment method appears in invoice document which does not happen in our case.
Rgds,
BABA

Differance amoung the Valuation Methods for Result Analysis

Dear All,
In SAP Product Cost Controlling ther are 3 types of Cosings
1. Production Cost by Order
Path:- Production Cost by Order ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for( Actual Cost)
2. Production Cost By Period
Path:- Production Cost by Period ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for ( Target Cost )
3. Production Cost by Sales Order
Path :- Production Cost by Sales Order ---> Period end Closing --->Defind Valuation Method for Result Analysis.
Note: Here the point is Valuation Methods ( 1 to 17 ) availabel in Production Cost by Sales Order only. The Valution Method is very important to Calculate WIP. Different Countries follows different methods, but in the By Order and By Period we can get these Valuation Methods. What would be the reasno behind this.
Regards

Dear All,
Any one have any ieda

Result Analysis Valuation Method 3

Hi PS Experts,
The building block document on Profit Realization 'I58_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE' says that as per IAS 11 and 18, we need to configure Result Analysis Valuation Method 3 only which is cost based. Is it right and whether you are all having this valuation method in your SAP system where IFRS standards are applicable.
Then, in addition to this cost based Revenue Recognition through this valuation method 3, we would like to input realistic POC(Engineer's certificate) into the system. Whether it is possible and if so, how and what other valuation method we need to use with or with changes to a particular valuation method. Appreciate your valuable inputs on this.
Regards!

Hello,
Cost based POC i.e Method 3 is compliant with IFRS requirements. Other methods also are so.
The choice of RA method depends on value/risk/duration/revenue plan of the project. We use this method for high value projects running for a long time where there is a need to recognise revenue before actual billing.
Completed contract method is also used and very much in accordance with accouning principles.
For POC calculated through progress determination- say Engineer's certificate- you can use method 7.
Thanks,

Runtime analysis for a Method

Hi,
Need some help on how to find the Runtime Analysis for a method in Class, as i am getting some performance issues with the statements in the method.
Please let me know ASAP about this Runtime Analysis for a method in a class

In Runtime analysis Look for
ABAP - In your ABAP code
DATABASE - It shows the performance of your SELECT statements in your program.
Just check how much % it is showing for both.
Check for following in your code.
1) Avoid SELECT *
2) Clear internal tables values which are not required at the ending of program, as it saves memory
etc.

NationalInstruments.Analysis.Dsp.SignalProcessing.Integrate method

Could you give me an example use of the NationalInstruments.Analysis.Dsp.SignalProcessing.Integrate method? I want to integrate a signal but I am not sure what to use for the boundary conditions (initialCondition and finalCondition).

eja,
The intialCondition and finalCondition inputs are to reduce error in the integration routine. Because you are taking an integral of a discrete signal, there will be some error at the signal's endpoints if you don't define these inputs. The amount of error will depend on the number of samples that you have.
For instance, If you try to take the integral of the array (1,1,1), with a dt of 1, and don't define intialCondition or finalCondition (i.e. set them to 0), the function will return 2.7, when the actual value should be 3. If you define initialCondition and finalCondition as 1, the function returns the correct value.
From the Measurement Studio help:
initialCondition and finalCondition minimize the overall error by increasing the accuracy at the boundaries, especially when the number of samples is small. Determining boundary conditions before the fact enhances accuracy.
For more documentation on the integrate function, open the Measurement Studio help, and search the index for "Integrate method"
Josh W. | National Instruments | Applications Engineer
Message Edited by Mist on 07-18-2006 03:17 PM
Josh W.
Certified TestStand Architect
Formerly blue

Define Measurement Method as Default in Progress Analysis

Hi All,
I have defined Measurement Method 0000000003(Milestone) in progress analysis for my company code.
But while running CNE1 for my project it is not picking the measurement method i have defined for my company code but it is picking the 0-100 Method .
Please advice.
Muzamil

Hello All,
I have read all the posts on the subject, we are facing the same problem as reported by Muzamil. I have done the follwing
1. Creat Progress Version
2. Define Measurement Method as Default Values
2.1. Define measurement methods for WEBE
2.2. Ddfine measurement methods for all activity types
3. Assign progress versions to the WBS Elements and Activities in their progress tabs.
But, wen I run CNE1, SAP does not pic the default methods while analyzing progress. SAP uses 0-100 method, which is not right.
Please propose some solution
Regards,
Murtaza

Quantity base POC method of result analysis

hello all,
We are trying to create the result analysis key with quantity based POC method for Projects. we are choosing the Profit basis as E,K,M but we are getting the error ' Profit basis is only used for sales order.
Can anybody help resolving the issue?
Regards,
sudhir

RamSiva,
I see that you've got the calculated COGS equal to the actual cost. I would have thought that for quantity based POC the calculated cost should be equal to POC x C(p). So if that's the case, I think the postings should be as follows:
Debit Revenue for 36,000
Credit Reserve for Revenue surplus for 36,000
Since I don't know what the planned cost were I don't know what the correct signs are for COGS adjustment;
Debit / Credit (Expense)
Debit / Credit (Capitalized cost or reserve for unrealized cost, depending on the sign)
If R(a) less than R(c) then:
Credit Revenue
Debit Revenue in excessive of billings
thanks,

Estimation method of progress Analysis

Hi,
We are having following scenario.
We are creating the project in PS. Then creating the PM order & assigning
the order to WBS element.
We want to use the Estimation method of progress analysis. Hence we havedefined Estimation method as default measurement method (both plan &
actual )for following objects,
1. WBS element
2. Internal processed activity
3. External processed activity
4. General cost activity
5. Order (Other than Network)
For WBS element & all activities we are able to manually maintain planned
POC & actual POC in CJ20n.
But for PM order we are not able to manually maintain planned POC &
Actual POC.
Can you please let me know where we can manually maintain the planned &
actual POC for PM Order.
regards,
Pradip Shelke

/@#$%%%%@ wrote:
> Can you please let me know where we can manually maintain the planned &
> actual POC for PM Order.
I do not think it is possible for order to use estimation method..
Please go for Cost / Time / Work proportional

Which Results Analysis Method is good for LOSS Projects?

Dear Experts,
Our client have Loss projects scenario.
for Eg. Plan Revenue_: 100,
Plan Cost__________: 120
Loss______________: = -20
Loss 20 should post in accounts at first period end closing time itself for that which Results Analysis Method can help me for it. Plz give me your valuable solution soon.
Thanks
Bhagirath

Hi,
which RA Method you are using.
If you are using method 01 then in OKG8,Choose RA Cat RIML(Reserves for Imminent loss) or if you are using 03 method then use POCL .Assign the GL accounts againt these RA cat one B/S Account and one P&L (not a Cost element).
Muzamil

Method analysis

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for