MIGO Costing issue

Hi all,
While doing Migo for i am getting cost wrong
My PO is 100000 INR including Excise amount and 5% VAT on it total PO value is 105000, INR
While doing MIGO the system is calculating the amount as follows
Base amount 100000
Excise: bed: 9066
EDU: 181
HEDu: 91
MRP indicator is checked in
Now the amount uploaded on cost is
90662( without excise) + 5000(Vat 5% 0n 100000) 466.9 (VAT 5% on 9066181+91)
But i should be 90662+5000=95662
Could you please help me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance
SAPUSER5

Dear,
what is the tax procedure are you using? Please check the calculation steps of VAT in your TAX Procedure...
Please let us know you tax procedure...
Br,Vivek

Similar Messages

MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP

Hi,
We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
The following is what we have done:
In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
we can see the amount in the report.
In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
Best Regards
qingda

Sorry, not reply these days.
And very thanks for all your replies.
I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
The business consultant want to control budget, control cost.
At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
Thank You All.
Best Regards
qingda

Problem with MIGO goods issue to a Service Order

Hello All
I have checked through out the forum as well as google and can not find the answer to my issue. Please read the below details and advise....
In MIGO; when trying to perform a goods issue to a service order (created in IW31) I get an error message the document does not contain any selectable items. I can not get passed this. When I use the transaction MB11, it works just fine. I went to the allowed transactions in OMJJ to ensure MIGO was listed as an allowed transaction... and MIGO is listed so I know that is not my issue. It is not related to the service order not being released as it is and plus if it was not released it would not work in MB11. I need this to work for the transaction MIGO....Please someone guide me in the proper direction of what is missing.

Hi Kimberly,
When you post the goods issue as an unplanned goods movement against the order, the reservation is not even read, so it is never updated.
The data that you enter manually in this unplanned goods issue does not even need to match with the data in the reservation: the material, the plant... evrything can be different. The order is just a CO Account Assignment in this case and the reservation is not processed in any moment. This way, it is not possible to close the reservation when posting this kind of unplanned goods issue, as the reservation is not even considered (and, therefore, never updated).
It is only when you post the planned goods issue referencing the order directly when you really post your goods issue with reference to the reservation behind the order. Only in this case is when the data in the posting is checked against the reservation (the material, the plant, etc cannot be changed because they are taken directly from the reservation). Also, it is only in this case when the quantity in the posting is checked against the quantity in the reservation. If we issue the total reserved quantity, the reservation is closed automatically.
In the first case for the unplanned goods issue there is never an automatic update of the reservation because the posting does not even consider the reservation. It is only when you post the goods movement with reference to the order (in MB1A using "To Order..." and in MIGO "Goods Issue + Order") when the reservation is taken into account in the goods movement and, therefore, updated.
You can also refer to the SAP Library:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a5/6337db43a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
It says:
"This withdrawal is unplanned because there is no reservation to be referenced."
An unplanned goods issue with the movement 261 and the order (working as CO account assignment object) is more or less the same as a 201 for a cost center. The cost center and the order are just CO Objects in this scenario.
I hope this helps you further!
Best regards,
Esther.

Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue

Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue when sending out Materials for repair or exchange under Warranty (Free)?

Please post it in SD/MM forum.

Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues

Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
Marc

Hi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department.

ABAP Error:Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (in MIGO-Goods issue to Production)

Hi Experts,
while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
THE ERROR IS:
Short text
     Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
      has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
     During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
     initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
     the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
     result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
    Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
    Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
    Row                                     34
    Module type                             (FORM)
    Module Name                             GLOBAL_INIT
Source Code Extract
Line SourceCde
    4
    5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
    6 *&      Form global_init
    7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
    8 *       text
    9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
   10 FORM global_init.
   11
   12 * local data
   13   DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
   14
   15
   16 * get ref to BAdIs
   17   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
   18     CHANGING
   19       instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
   20 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
   21 * CHANGING
   22 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
   23 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
   24 *    CHANGING
   25 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
   26   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST

Hi Rob thanks for your response. I thought about doing an OSS note however; I would think I would need to get the problem in config corrected first as it contradicts each other. The problem I am talking about is how they are to return material to vendor....I have never even seen this as a process in my 10 years....
Process.....when the PO is a return to vendor PO they go to migo and choose the goods receipt and mvmt type 101 and the system will default the 161 in the item level....the two are inconsistent. If I try to change the top level to a 161 mvmt (as this is what I am used to seeing) it gives the error that the PO is not a stock transport order... Would you agree that I should correct that problem first before creating an OSS note?

MIGO Cost-center

Hi,
In MIGO, cost-center field, under account assignments is not editable. Can we make it editable using some customization setting?
Are there any User-exits or BADI's to change the cost-center.
Thanks in advance,
Vishnu Priya

Hi,
Can i ask the need for doing this, are u not sure about the correct cost centre while creating the PO,
In such a case i suggest creating a PO with acct assignment unknow and assign the correct acct assignment at the time of MIRO (probably u will be sure abt the cost centre at this time)
Hope this helps
Reg
Dheeraj

MIGO Goods issue Reg

Hi Gurus,
We upgraded to 6.0 from 4.5b.When I am trying with MIGO,Goods issue with Mov type 201,221,261 etc.
System is giving error message as"Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 201 X X _ B)"
Edited by: hanuma reddy on Mar 13, 2008 11:04 PM

Hello Hanuma
I would assume that this is caused by the fact that you do not specify the needed basis in the MIGO transaction.
If you look in OMJJ for 201 movement type at folder short texts or update control, then you will see a column called Mvt for movement indicator.
DO you see see Bs and Fs there or it is blank, if it is blank then try using other tcode as mentioned above MB1A or MIGO_GI.
Regards
Yogesh

Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue

Dear All,
Earlier this issue was posted in PP forum but didnt get the answer
Kindly follow the link.
[Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue;
Regards,
Shayam

Dear Shyam,
Normally the Total costs in activity price calculation (KP26) are taken and multiplied with quantity and charged off to the receivers irrespective of the type of costs i.e. whether it is a Fixed cost or variable cost. We don't have functionality to consider the Fixed costs to spread across the output and take the per unit value accordingly. The Fixed costs in kp26 are updated just to reflect the costs in the cost component structure as Fixed costs.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Batch not determined in MIGO-Goods Issue for cost center

Hi,
We are using Batch Determination while posting Goods Issue to cost center. However, when we enter * in the batch field system does not propose the batches.
We have done following settngs
Strategy type ME01 which is SAP standard
Batch search procedure - ME0001
Search procedure ME0001 is assigned to movement type 201 in "Allocate IM Search Procedure/Activate Check"
Sort Rule - 01 using charecterstics (ascending)
Class - BATCH_MASTER created
Characterstics - Size, Shape, Color (No table or field are maintained in Addional Data) assigned to this class.
Material is maintained with classification and batch management active.
Master Data - Search Strategy is maintained using t code MBC1 for stratefy type ME01 (Key combination Movement Type/Plant/Material). Selection criteria - Values maintained for characterstics. Sort Rule - 01
Now when we are issuing goods to cost center and enter * in batch field, system is supposed to suggest the batches (material is in stock and batches are available). However, system does not give pop up.
Am I missing something? Where is the batch determination button as system is giving message to use button?
Shekhar

Thank you for the answer.
It gives only one batch and not all the batches. Why it could be?
Shekhar

MIGO - Goods issue to determine cost center based on storage location

Hi Experts,
Any idea how to determine the cost center based on the storage location instead of from tcode - OKB9 when creating Good Issue via MIGO_GI?
Points will be awarded for useful solutions. Thanks.

Hey Janet,
A Cost center cannot be determined from an SLOC..it si always at the company code and valuation aea level

Regarding planned delivery cost issue in MIRO

Dear SAP GURU,
we have a requirement which has been elaborated below
ME21N:- (45-1)
We have creates PO, the details are
MMR          : -      COPPER
QTY          : -      100 KG
Unit Price     : -      Rs. 10 /-
Total price      : -     Rs. 1000/ -
FRC1 (Fright /Quantity)     :-     Rs.5 /- per unit. (Hence for 100 kg it will become Rs.500/-)
MIGO:-
We have done 4 GRN for one PO. For example
ME21N     MIGO
     5-1(20 KG)
     5-2(20 KG)
     5-3(20 KG)
     5-4(20 KG)
     5-5(20 KG)
When we have checked all the delivery charges for each grn document, we found that the system automatically bifurcates total delivery charges of Rs. 200/- into Rs. 20/- in each GRN document.
MIRO:-
1)     In this level the system is not bifurcate the delivery charges at all and it showing cumulative value in the line items.
2)     But for the each GRN quantity posted, can be seen in separate line item in the transaction level. For example
Existing behavior:-
Amount     Quantity      Reference
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-1
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-2
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-3
Rs. 200/-     20 kg     5-4
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-5
Rs. 500/-      100 kg     FRC1(Condition type)
In this case the system is not bifurcating the delivery cost as per GRN wise.
Our requirement is:-
Amount     Quantity      Reference
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-1
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-2
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-3
Rs. 200/-     20 kg     5-4
Rs. 200/-     20 Kg     5-5
Rs. 100 /-      20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /-     20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /-     20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /-     20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /-     20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /-     20 Kg     FRC1(Condition type)
Hence our requirement is all the planned delivery charges should be bifurcated in the transaction screen.
Conclusion:-
1)     Please let me know what the configuration settings we need are.
2)     If not, any suitable note available for such sceanario.

Hi ,
I do not have any issue related GR quantity but delivery charges are being not bifurcated instead that it is showing the cumulative quantity or value
reagrds
praveer

Sales order cost issue

Hi All,
I need help with the production issue.There are 2 sales orders which have cost recognized in one of the month
but they are not posting to WIP.Can anyone explain me the reason for this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Reema Sen on Jun 10, 2009 2:19 AM

Hi,
You will have to enable project manufacturing if you want to collect manufacturing cost on a project. Once you create a project, add this project to a project manufacturing organization through a PJM responsibility. Once you associate project and PJM org you will be able to put the PJM organization in the sales order line created on a Project sales order in Oracle OM. Also, mention the project number in that sales order.
Once this sales order is shipped, run the cost collection program and it will bring in the manufacturing costs to project.
Hope it helps
Regards
Kaushal

Costing Issue-Previous Price changes in Accounting 1 tab in Material Master

Hi SAP Experts,
Our Client has an issue with "previous price" field under the "Accounting 1" tab in Mateial master .The issue is that client never did costing to this material XXXXXXwith plant XXXX. But system is showing value in the "previous price" field. We have checked whether previious cost estimate exists. There was no previous cost estimate and still the system updated "previous price" field.
Can anyone let me know in which cases the system updates "Previous Price" field in Material Master ?
Your help is highly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
K.S.K

Hi
May be this material was created with reference to the same material in other plant or with ref to some other material or may be costing run was deleted from CKR1
br, Ajay M

Freight Cost issue at Order Management

Dear All,
I have Booked a sales order and done pick release process. Now, I would like to attach freight cost before shipping process. Gone to Shipping transaction form, queried my order number then gone to Actions>Assign Freight Cost>Go and assigned predefined freight cost for 1000USD. But it was not reflected in AR Invoice.
What may be the cause of this issue.

Hi Al,
Issue has been resolved. We can use Group condition for this requirement.
Thanks to all, Lakshmikanth

MIGO Costing issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for